Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Institute of Optical and Electronic Materials, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, 21073, Germany
Institute of Thermal Separation Processes, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, 21073, Germany
Institute of Nanoelectronics, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 January 2013
Received in revised form 10 December 2013
Accepted 24 December 2013
Available online 7 January 2014
Keywords:
Aerogel
Conductive polymer
Structuration
Extracellular matrix scaffold
Supercritical CO2 drying
a b s t r a c t
We report the development of an organic conducting mesoporous material, as coat for invasive electrodes, by a
novel methodology based on the use of starch aerogel as template. The poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
(PEDOT) aerogel was synthesized by polymerization of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene within a saturated starch
aerogel with iron (III) p-toluenesulfonate (oxidizing agent) and subsequent removal of the polysaccharide template, followed by supercritical CO2 drying. The chemical structure and oxidation state of the resulting material
were studied by Raman spectroscopy. The morphology and surface properties of the obtained nanoporous material were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), micro computed tomography (CT) and nitrogen
adsorptiondesorption techniques. The composition and thermal behaviour were evaluated by energy dispersive
spectroscopy (EDS) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) respectively. A preliminary biocompatibility test veried the non-cytotoxic effects of the PEDOT aerogel. The large surface area and wide pore size distribution of the
PEDOT conductive aerogel, along with its electrical properties, enable it to be used as extracellular matrix scaffold
for biomedical applications.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Long-term invasive electrodes require low electrochemical impedance and biocompatibility [1]. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
(PEDOT), as coating layer on invasive electrodes, is used for electrical
stimulation of nerve cells and recording of brain impulses since this
polymer provides lower impedance (Z) and higher charge injection
(Qinj) than bare metal electrodes [25]. These electrochemical properties of the PEDOT and its simple processability can be applied to a
broad range of applications [6,7]. Besides, cytocompatible scaffolds are
recommended to improve the biological response [8], because those
materials emulate the topological and microstructural characteristics
of the extracellular matrix. Extracellular scaffolds require properties
such as a high degree of porosity, high surface-volume ratio, high degree
of pore interconnectivity and appropriate pore size [8]. PEDOT aerogel
as extracellular scaffold is thereby a strategy to improve the biological
and electrical properties of the invasive electrode interface.
Aerogels are highly porous solid nanomaterials with unique characteristics, such as extremely low densities, large open pores and high
inner surface areas that provide interesting physical properties [9,10].
They can be prepared from molecular precursors of inorganic and organic origin by solgel processing and subsequently by supercritical
Corresponding author at: Eissendorfer strasse 38, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
E-mail address: ricardo.starbird@tu-harburg.de (R. Starbird).
0928-4931/$ see front matter 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.032
178
(a)
S
Ethanol, 40 oC
O OO S
S
O
Fe(OTs)3
O
O
O S
O
O
O
n
(b)
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials
3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) and iron (III) p-toluenesulfonate
hexahydrate Fe(OTs)3 6H2O (yellow powder) were purchased from
SigmaAldrich Company Ltd. Ethanol (99.8% purity), dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO) and acetonitrile analytical-grade solvents were purchased
from Carl Roth Company. Native corn starch (Starch Amylo N-460)
was provided by Roquette. Vegetable (canola) oil was obtained
from domestic shops. CO 2 (N99.9 mol% purity) was supplied by
AGA Gas GmbH. All chemicals were used without further purication. The mouse broblast cell line NIH-3T3 was obtained from
179
Fig. 2. (a) Starch aerogel (SA), (b) starch aerogel saturated with iron (III) ptoluenesulfonate (SFeA), (c) starch PEDOT aerogel (SPA) and (d) PEDOT aerogel (PA).
180
(a)
PA
SA
SPA
SFeA
SPA
PA
Intensity (u.a)
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700
200
250
300
Fig. 3. Raman spectra of PEDOT aerogel (bottom) and starch PEDOT aerogel (top). Dotted
line indicates the Raman shift related to C=C symmetric stretching at 1427 cm1.
PEDOT doping level demonstrates the close interaction between polymer and the starch template.
EDS analyses (see supplementary information) were used to corroborate the nature and qualitative composition of the obtained materials.
The starch aerogel sample shows only presence of carbon (0.28 keV)
and oxygen (0.52 keV) in its composition. SFeA sample evidences
sulphur (2.31 keV and 2.46 keV) and iron (0.62, 0.7, 6.4 and 7.1 keV)
signals as a result of the iron salt addition. Likewise, after the polymerization, an iron (0.62, 0.7, 6.4 and 7.1 keV) signal is observed in the
SPA sample even after several ethanol washes, indicating a high interaction starch-iron. Iron signal is absent only after the template dissolution
by DMSO in the PA sample. The PA sample shows carbon (0.3 keV) oxygen (0.5 keV) and sulphur (2.31 and 2.46 keV) signals, composition
expected for PEDOT.
TGA is a helpful technique to determine the thermal stability of materials as well as their compositional properties. TG analyses were performed, in order to conrm the interactions between the components
during the reaction. The initial decomposition temperature (onset)
and ash content are affected by the interactions of the reagents in the
different steps of the synthesis. In the case of the template, the thermal
depolymerization occurs when the temperature exceeds 280 C. The SA
sample thermogram illustrates two distinct regions, at 286 C and
320 C (Fig. 4a,b, dashed line). The initial phase at 286 C causes modication of the polymer structure due to a rapid breakdown of the molecular structure to form products as pyrodextrins [33,34]. A
carbonaceous residue remains (ca. 8% w/w) after all the volatile products have been driven off (Fig. 4a). It has been postulated that the transition observed at around 280 C is due to selective dehydration, the
polyhydroxyl groups elimination and the depolymerization [33,34].
The effect of the iron (III) in the starch template is observed at the
initial degradation temperature. The thermal decomposition of the
oxidant-template composite (SFeA) starts at 240 C (Fig. 4b, solid
line) and the composite generates 28% (w/w) of ashes (Fig. 4a, solid
line). The lower initial temperature and higher ash content can be associated with the interaction between the starch hydroxyl groups and iron
(III) ion from the Fe(OTs)3 salt, conrmed by EDS. The starch inter-chain
interactions are reduced by the iron (III) ions decreasing the temperature of decomposition [18] and yielding higher ash content than the
starch aerogel.
The SPA sample presents an initial thermal decomposition at around
260 C and degrades rapidly (Fig. 4b, dotted line). The thermal decomposition of the SPA composite takes place slowly between 290 and
450 C and producing ca. 20% (w/w) of ashes (Fig. 4a, dotted line).
The single thermal decomposition of SPA sample (Fig. 4b, dotted line)
350
400
450
500
550
600
T (C)
(b)
0.0
Wavenumber
150
(cm-1)
-0.5
-1.0
PA
SA
SPA
SFeA
-1.5
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
T (C)
Fig. 4. Thermogravimetry curves (a) and their derivatives (b) of starch aerogel (SA dashed
line), starch iron sample (SFeA solid line), starch PEDOT aerogel (SPA dotted line) and
PEDOT aerogel (PA dot-dashed line) in an atmosphere of owing dry nitrogen at
10 C/min heating rate.
rather than multi-thermal depolymerization of the composite components suggests intimate interations in the SPA sample.
The PEDOT aerogel shows analogous thermal behaviour (Fig. 4a,b,
dot-dashed line) to the SPA sample at a slightly lower temperature
(250 C). The dissolution of the template reduced the thermal stability
of the PA sample because the concentration of doping agent affects
the heat stability of the PEDOT [35,36]. However, comparable thermal
behavior has been described for PEDOT lms [37].
Raman spectroscopy and TGA analyses conrmed the high interaction between the oxidizing agent-template and templatepolymer
interactions during the PEDOT aerogel synthesis. This high interaction
is the key to enable that the conductive PEDOT aerogel retains the starch
aerogel morphology, even after the template dissolution.
Table 1
Physical properties of the starch template (SA) and the resulting PEDOT aerogel (PA).
Sample ID
ABET
Vp
dp
Skeletal
density
Bulk
density
(m2/g)
(cm3/g)
()
(g/cm3)
(g/cm3)
83 4
58 3
0.45 0.02
0.28 0.01
40 1
41 2
1.21 0.04
1.01 0.05
0.19 0.02
0.12 0.02
from the polymer complex might affect the skeletal density of the
PEDOT aerogel.
The textural properties of the resulting material is mainly dened by
the template. The samples are characterized by SEM and low temperature N2 adsorptiondesorption analysis to study the effect of this new
templating methodology in the nal properties of PEDOT aerogel.
Fig. 5 shows SEM images of PEDOT particles, starch aerogel, starchPEDOT and PEDOT aerogels, which offer a comparative study of the
(a)
Volume (cm3/g)
181
300
SA
PA
200
100
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
(b)
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
100
SA
1000
0.3
PA
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
(c)
0.0
100
1000
182
105
0
-10
-20
104
Phase ()
Gold electrode
PEDOT aerogel electrode
103
-30
-40
-50
-60
-70
Gold electrode
PEDOT aerogel electrode
-80
10
102
103
104
105
106
-90
102
103
104
105
106
Fig. 7. Impedance magnitude (left) and phase (right) measurements for 1 mm2 electrode area: Gold electrode (solid line); PEDOT aerogel electrode (dashed line).
C.A. Garca-Gonzlez acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Education for the nancial support through a postdoctoral fellowship in the
frame of the National Program for Staff Mobility from the R&D&i National Plan 20082011.
Ricardo Starbird would like to thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR)
and the Science and Technology Bureaus of Costa Rica (MICIT and
CONICIT) for the scholarship provided.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.12.032.
References
[1] H. Yoon, D.C. Deshpande, V. Ramachandran, V.K. Varadan, Nanotechnology 19
(2008).
[2] S.J. Wilks, S.M. Richardson-Burns, J.L. Hendricks, D.C. Martin, K.J. Otto, Front.
Neuroeng. 2 (2009) 7.
[3] J.Y. Yang, D.C. Martin, J. Mater. Res. 21 (2006) 11241132.
[4] X.T. Cui, D.D. Zhou, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15 (2007) 502508.
[5] R. Starbird, W. Bauhofer, M. Meza-Cuevas, W.H. Krautschneider, Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON), 2012, IEEE, 2012, pp. 15.
[6] Y. Li, D. Wang, X. Pei, Z. Shi, L. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Jin, Soft Matter 7 (2011)
26822686.
[7] X. Zhang, D. Chang, J. Liu, Y. Luo, J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010) 50805085.
[8] A.-D. Bendrea, L. Cianga, I. Cianga, J. Biomater. Appl. 26 (2011) 384.
[9] A.C. Pierre, G.M. Pajonk, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 42434265.
[10] C.A. Garca-Gonzlez, M.C. Camino-Rey, M. Alnaief, C. Zetzl, I. Smirnova, J. Supercrit.
Fluids 66 (2012) 297306.
[11] Y. Xu, Z. Sui, B. Xu, H. Duan, X. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 85798584.
[12] C.A. Garcia-Gonzles, E. Carenza, M. Zeng, I. Smirnova, A. Roig, RSC Adv. 2 (2012)
98169823.
[13] C.A. Garca-Gonzlez, M. Alnaief, I. Smirnova, Carbohydr. Polym. 86 (2011)
14251438.
183
[14] C.A. Garca-Gonzlez, J.J. Uy, M. Alnaief, I. Smirnova, Carbohydr. Polym. 88 (2012)
13781386.
[15] C. Garca-Gonzlez, I. Smirnova, J. Supercrit. Fluids 79 (2013) 152158.
[16] L.Q. Tang, W. Ni, H.Y. Zhao, Q. Xu, J.X. Jiao, Bioresources 4 (2009) 3848.
[17] G. Schopf, G. Kossmehl, Polythiophenes - Electrically Conductive Polymers,
1291997. 3145.
[18] B. Gyurcsik, L. Nagy, Coord. Chem. Rev. 203 (2000) 81149.
[19] A. Elschner, S. Kirchmeyer, W. Lvenich, U. Merker, K. Reuter, PEDOT Principles and
Aplications of an Intrinsically Conductive Polymer, CRC Press, 2010.
[20] S. Kirchmeyer, A. Elscher, K. Reuter, Counterions for PEDOT, PEDOT Principles and
Applications of an Intrinsically Conductive Polymer, CRC Press, 2010. 8389.
[21] T.Y. Kim, C.M. Park, J.E. Kim, K.S. Suh, Synth. Met. 149 (2005) 169174.
[22] T.Y. Kim, J.E. Kim, K.S. Suh, Polym. Int. 55 (2006) 8086.
[23] Y.-H. Ha, N. Nikolov, S.K. Pollack, J. Mastrangelo, B.D. Martin, R. Shashidhar, Adv.
Funct. Mater. 14 (2004) 615622.
[24] M.R. Abidian, J.M. Corey, D.R. Kipke, D.C. Martin, Small 6 (2010) 421429.
[25] M.R. Abidian, D.C. Martin, Biomaterials 29 (2008) 12731283.
[26] K. Singh, D. Everett, R. Haul, L. Moscou, R. Pierotti, J. Rouquerol, T. Siemieniewska,
Pure Appl. Chem. 57 (1985) 603619.
[27] B.E. Conway, J.O.M. Bockris, R. White, A. Lasia, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and its Applications, Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, Springer, US, 2002.
143248.
[28] W.W. Chiu, J. Travas-Sejdic, R.P. Cooney, G.A. Bowmaker, J. Raman Spectrosc. 37
(2006) 13541361.
[29] F. Tran-Van, S. Garreau, G. Louarn, G. Froyer, C. Chevrot, J. Mater. Chem. 11 (2001)
13781382.
[30] S. Garreau, G. Louarn, J.P. Buisson, G. Froyer, S. Lefrant, Macromolecules 32 (1999)
68076812.
[31] M. Lapkowski, A. Pron, Synth. Met. 110 (2000) 7983.
[32] T.Y. Kim, T.H. Lee, J.E. Kim, R.M. Kasi, C.S.P. Sung, K.S. Suh, J. Polym. Sci. A Polym.
Chem. 46 (2008) 68726879.
[33] P. Aggarwal, D. Dollimore, Instrum. Sci. Technol. 27 (1999) 191197.
[34] Y.X. Xu, V. Miladinov, M.A. Hanna, Cereal Chem. 81 (2004) 735740.
[35] H. Zheng, Y. Jiang, J. Xu, Y. Yang, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 26 (2011)
422428.
[36] R. Kiebooms, A. Aleshin, K. Hutchison, F. Wudl, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997)
1103711039.
[37] R. Kiebooms, A. Aleshin, K. Hutchison, F. Wudl, A. Heeger, Synthetic Metals International Conference on Science and Technology of Synthetic, 101, 1999, pp. 436437.
[38] K.E. Aasmundtveit, E.J. Samuelsen, L.A.A. Pettersson, O. Inganas, T. Johansson, R.
Feidenhans, Synth. Met. 101 (1999) 561564.
[39] S.F. Cogan, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10 (2008) 275309.