Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Defining intuition
Intuition in psychology is seen as a specific process of decision making
characterized by fast, parallel, effortless, associative and emotional operation.
This is distinct from rational reasoning characterized by slow, serial, deliberate,
rule-governed and effortful processes. Together these processes form a twosystem model of cognition; System I that intuition is part of, and System II
that is rational reasoning (Kahneman, 2003).
Researchers have also tried to uncover how intuitive decisions are actually
made. Kahneman (2003) and Gigerenzer (2001) have proposed a heuristic
model of intuition in which deliberate rational reasoning is supplanted by rules
of thumb (i.e. heuristics) that are processed automatically and unconsciously.
Hogarth (2001) proposes that intuition is a result of tacit learning that builds
up our cultural capital, i.e. the repertoire of automatically learned responses
guiding our behavior. Klein proposes a two-part process of pattern matching
and mental simulation of intuition. The model explains why experts do not to
get into analysis paralysis but to make quick trustworthy decisions intuitively
using mental simulations to assess action scripts that in turn are informed by
our mental models (Klein, 1999).
However, although today much discussed and widely recognized as a very
important tool for operating in the real world, the experience of intuition
remains fairly poorly understood (Sinclair & Ashkanasy, 2005). For example,
we do not know well enough how bodily (sensory) and emotional aspects
are related to intuition. Further, it is often very difficult to separate intuition
from other instantaneous modes of knowing, like instincts, over-learned
automations, imagination or emotion-ridden wishful thinking.
2
For the purposes of our discussion, we first define intuition very broadly as
System I knowledge processing: fast, non-deliberate, unconscious, effortless
and sometimes characterized by a revelation of knowledge that the person did
not know she knew. We then propose, based on our research, some specific
types of intuition, which aim to further define the concept of intuition.
2. The study
We have thus far completed the pilot study of our research project and therefore
our findings are preliminary. The goal of the pilot study was to investigate the
differences and similarities of intuitive knowledge processes between creative
professionals of varying expertise areas and levels of intuitive skill.
1. Methodology
Our study utilizes qualitative research methods, with semi-structured
interviews, group discussions, and short exercises in classroom settings. We
chose qualitative methods because they allow us to investigate the participants
experiences and ideas on intuition in-depth. Indeed, qualitative methods are
well suited for investigating a phenomenon whose concepts have not yet been
identified fully (Strauss and Corbin, 1998).
2. Sample
The sample consists of three groups:
1. Novice designers: A group of students in Coaching Intuition course
(n=11)
2. Design professionals in Finland (n=4),
3. Intuitive expert practitioners in Russia and Finland (n=10)
The sampling criterion for each group was the following. The students on
the intuition course consisted of Masters level students at the Media Lab of
University of Art and Design. All students were Finnish. The course was an
elective so the students chose to take the course themselves. Researchers Samu
Mielonen and Asta Raami taught the course. The course reviewed relevant
literature, initiated group discussions on the topic, and introduced simple
techniques for enhancing intuition.
The fourteen persons interviewed were divided into two groups: design
professionals and intuitive professionals. Design professionals had a degree
from the field of design and several years (less than ten) of professional
experience in this field. The design professionals were from Finland. Intuitive
expert practitioners had ten years or more experience in their respective fields
(e.g. film, design, music, theatre, literature, dance), saw intuition as an integral
part of their working style, and were nominated by their peers as highly
intuitive. The intuitive expert practitioners were from Finland and Russia. The
4
determine who we think is intuitive, and ask designers themselves when they
think they were engaged in a process of intuition (e.g. post-hoc).
Three further semantic issues arose in the interview process. First, many
interviewees lacked a conceptual model of their personal intuitive experience.
Second, many of the interviewees seemed to fuse the concept of intuition with
the concept of creative ideation or creativity in general. Third, interviewees
lacked shared language and concepts with each other. Together these three
challenges made comparing verbal descriptions challenging. Nevertheless,
such confusion is a finding in itself, further underlying the need for additional
definition of the concept of intuition.
3. Novice designers as users of intuition
Eleven design students studying for their Master of Arts degree in digital
media design participated on a course titled Coaching Creativity, with
special emphasis on intuition. The students enrolled voluntarily and it is fair
to assume that they participated out of internal motivation to further develop
their intuitive capabilities. Yet none of the students were acquainted with
intuitive decision making methods and most used intuition sporadically and
non-intentionally in their work as designers.
The students were asked to make concept maps illustrating their personal
definition, skills and experience of intuition. Altogether, the students shared
similar experiences and feelings about the use intuition in their work. Most
had no clear conceptual model of intuition, neither adapted from elsewhere
nor self-generated. The students also felt that they were limited in their
intentional use of intuition; intuition either happened or did not happen - as
if by itself. Students often expressed that sometimes intuitive process itself
feels trustworthy and the intuitive decision can be trusted, while at other
times both can be suspect or uncertain. Mostly the students used intuition to
answer yes or no questions, with no more information attached to the intuitive
understanding.
Further, although the maps revealed some variance of concepts, there were
many shared elements in the maps. Most of the students mentioned trust,
relaxation, openness and connection to oneself as concepts relating to intuition.
Remarkably all of them mentioned the presence of positive emotions in
intuitive experience. Other concepts mentioned in the concepts maps included
sensitivity to feelings and emotions, experience of flow, free association and
self-knowledge.
The students were not used to trying to train their intuitive skills in an
intentional manner. However, when exposed to basic intuitive decision making
exercises the students responded very positively. The exercises consisted
of simple guided visual imagery, body sensation detection and emotional
response self-reflection. Further, some students expressed surprise at the kind
6
of answers they arrived at through the exercises; often the answer contradicted
their expectations, i.e. rational thoughts and decisions made earlier, and evoked
genuine surprise.
4. Professional designers and intuition
The findings from the interviews with professional designers were more
varied and harder to characterize as unified as those of the design students.
However, the design professionals use of intuition differed from that of
students in a few key elements. Compared to novice designers, the professional
designers had a higher level of trust in self and in the solutions generated by
their intuition. With the help of intuition professional designers were also
able to receive ideas or parts of design solutions, not just answers to yes and no
questions. The interviewees described that through intuition they were able to
detect a promising direction of inquiry, for example this feels good, Im going
to continue, as well as recognize directions that are not working, this is not a
good idea. Their intuitions were thus more directional.
Professional designers were also able to describe their intuition at basic
level even though they did not have a conceptual model of it. Mostly they
described their intuition with the help of metaphors, e.g. a compass pointing
to the right direction, or opening your mind for ideas, which describes a state
of non-judgmental observation and receiving of ideas. Mostly professional
designers described experiencing intuition within the domain of design.
As with students, professional designers felt that emotional arousal was
an integral part of the intuitive process. Potential directions of design were
associated with positive emotions, while negative emotions about design ideas
mostly resulted in discarding those ideas. Intentional use of intuition appeared
to be fairly uncommon, as it was with the students.
5. Expert intuitive practitioners
Expert intuitive practitioners conceptual understanding of intuition was even
more varied than that of novice designers and professional designers. Some
intuitive practitioners had a conceptual model of intuition, including what it is
and what it is not, while others were content to use intuition without defining
it conceptually. This may be partly due to the fact that the interviewees were
from two different cultures, Finland and Russia. The cultural comparison is a
very promising and important part of our inquiry. In this paper however, we do
not analyze the cultural variation because our data collection is incomplete.
Nevertheless, all expert intuitive practitioners were able to describe
intuition verbally, or could at least describe some parameters, which either
supported or prevented their personal use of intuition. Further, the intuitive
practitioners shared some very similar tendencies in their experience and use of
Samu Mielonen, Mia Keinnen, Asta Raami, Leena Rouhiainen
10
11