Power System Modelling and Analysis

Sandeep N
Research Scholar
Department of Electrical and Electronics
National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

Figure 1: One machine to infinite bus system.

xd = 1.79
00

Tdo = 0.032 s
0

Tdo = 4.3 s

00

xd = 0.169

xd = 0.135

00

Tqo = 0.85 s

Tqo = 0.05 s

00

xq = 1.71

xq = 0.228

xq = 0.2

H = 3 MJ/MVA

xl = 0.7

wB = 100

Peg = 0.5
Table 1: System Parameters

Summary of equations pertaining to SMIB system :

dF
dt
dH
dt
dK
dt
dG
dt

=
=
=
=

1
xd
0 [F + d +
0 Ef d ]
Td
xd xd
1
00 [H + d ]
Td
1
[K + q ]
Tq00
1
[G + q ]
Tq0
0

00

(2)
(3)
(4)

00

x x
xd xd xd
Eq = d 0 d H +
( 0 )F
xd
xd
xd
0
00
00
00
x q xq xq
xq xq
00
Ed = {
K +
( 0 )G }
x0q
xq
xq
00

(1)

(5)
(6)

00

iq =

Ed + Eb sin()
00
xq1

(7)

00

Eq + Eb cos()
id =
00
xd1
00

00

00

00

xq1 = xq + xl

(8)
(9)

xd1 = xd + xl

(10)
1

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

00

00

00

00

d = xd id + Eq

2H

(11)

q = xq iq Ed

(12)

Teg = d iq q id

(13)

d
(/B ) = Tm Teg
dt
d

=(
1)B
dt
B

(14)
(15)

Initial value evaluation:

Evaluating the initial values of all the variables using the given data and the formulas
listed above.
|Vt ||Eb |
sin()
xl
11
sin()
0.5 =
0.7
= 20.48730

Peg0 =

Vt Eb
I0 =
j0.7
120.4873 10
I0 =
j0.7

I0 = 0.508110.2437
I0 = 0
Eq0
Eq0
Eq0
Eq0
iq0 + jid0
iq0 + jid0
iq0
id0

= Vt0 + jxq I0
= 120.4873 + j1.71 0.508110.2437
= 1.436657.010
=
= I0 (0 0 )
= 0.5081(10.2437 57.01)
= 0.348
= -0.3702

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

Ef d0 = Eq0 (xd xq ) id0

Ef d0 = 1.4366 ((1.79 1.71) 0.3702)
Ef d0 = 1.4662
d0 = xd id0 + Ef d0
d0 = 1.79 0.3702 + 1.4662
d0 = 0.8036
q0 = xq iq0
d0 = 1.71 0.348
d0 = 0.5951
0

F 0
F 0
F 0

xd
= d0 +
0 Ef d
xd xd
= 0.5951 + (0.169/(1.79 0.169)) 1.4622
= 0.9565

H0 = d0 = 0.8036
G0 = K0 = q0 = 0.348
0 = 0.9950rad
MATLAB/SIMULINK Modelling and simulation results:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Simulink model for (a) equation (1), (b) equation (2), (c) equation (3), (d)
equation (4).

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: Simulink model for (a) equation (5), (b) equation (6), (c) equation (7, 8), (d)
equation (13, 14, 15).

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: (a) Swing curves for different fault clearing time (tcr ) (b) Rotor speed in p.u for
different fault clearing time (tcr ).

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)
00

00

Figure 5: plot of (a) Slip (b) Sm (c) terminal voltage (|Vt |) (d) Eq (b) Ed (c) F (d) H
(e) G (f) K (g) id for a fault clearing time (tcr ) = 0.24 s.

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 6: plot of (a) iq (b) iF (c) Active power flow (d) Reactive power flow for a fault
clearing time (tcr ) = 0.24 s.

NITK Surathkal

SMIB System rotor angle stability analysis and to find critical clearing time (tccr )

Conclusions:
The critical clearing time was found out to be tccr = 0.22451 s.
The steady state active and reactive power flows are
|Eq0 ||Vt0 |
sin(0 0 )
xd
1.4366 1
=
sin(57.01 20.4873)
1.79
= 0.5
|Eq0 |
{|Eq0 | |Vt0 | cos(0 0 )
=
xd
1.4366
=
{1.4366 1 cos(57.01 20.4873)}
1.71
= 0.5318
|Vt0 | 1
sin(0 )
=
0.7
11
=
sin(20.4873)
0.7
= 0.5
|Vt0 |
=
{|Vt0 | |Eb | cos(0 )
0.7
1
=
{1 1 cos(20.4873)
0.7
= 0.0904

PGBus1 =
PGBus1

QGBus1
QGBus1

PBus1IB
PBus1IB

QBus1IB
QBus1IB

NITK Surathkal