Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INTRODUCTION
The one dimensional Fermi gas with
attractive interaction among the fermions
has been used as a model to know the
physical properties of realistic Fermi system.
The exact solution for its ground state
energy is known from the Bathe ansatz1,
therefore one can test approximate solutions
of the systems. Quick, Esbagg and deLalno2
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
117
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013)
bg
1
k1k2V| | K3 K4 Ck+1 Ck+2 Ck3 Ck4
4 k1, k2 , k3, k4
(1)
where ki denote momentum and spin
quantum number of the particle and
k 1 k 2 |V | K 3 K 4 is the anti-symmetrized
matrix element of the two body interaction.
Using Bogoliubov transformation of the
creation
and
annihilation
operators
Hamiltonian (1) is transformed into a new
form. The transformed Hamiltonian is
derived by several author, 16-18 The
transformed Hamiltonian is written in the
following form
1
Hk201k2 k+1 k+2 + H . C.
2 k1k2
H = H o + Hk111k2 k+1 k2 +
k1k 2
dH
40
k1k 2 k 3 k 4
k+ k+ 2 +k k+ + H . C.
31
k1k 2 k 3 k 4
k+ k+ 2 +k k+
k1k 2 k 3 k 4
dH
i
+ H . C.i
k1k 2 k 3 k 4
1
Hk22k k k k+ +k 2 k+3 k+4
4 k1k2 k3k4 1 2 3 4 1
(2)
In equation (2), H is the BCS
ground state energy and H11 is the diagonal
part, H20 is the off-diagonal part of the
Hamiltonian. If one demand that the offdiagonal part H20 vanishes then one obtains
o
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013) 118
the well known relations of BCS gap
equation19.
The H31 term in the Hamiltonian in
n
eq (2) does not contribute to the RPA
equations. The other terms H40 and H22 in
the Hamiltonian describe the residual
interaction among the quasi particle.
These terms are neglected in the
model BCS approximation. Therefore in
order to go beyond the BCS mean field
approximation one has to include the
residual interaction among the quasi particle.
Now, one can treat the quasi particle within
the generalized RPA approximation. For
this, one introduces two particles Green's
function with respect to quasi particle basis
and derive the equation of motion for the
Green's function G. The equation has the
form of Dyson equation20 for the two
particle propagator matrix G. The static
elements of the mass operator A and B are
given by the double commutation21
k ,q
G022
k ,q
(5)
where
E k ,q = E k + E k + q
= G011
+ E k ,q
g b g
bkq, g + d 1E i 2 E
nb k , q g + lb k , q g
k ,k
2
k ,q
k ,q
m( k , q ) Z k q ,
k q ,
k q ,
(6)
and
G 11 kk q , G 21 kk q ,
g b g
1
= G b kq , g +
d E i 2mbk , qg Z
+nb k , q g + E lb k , q g
k ,k
k q ,
2
k ,q
k q ,
k q ,
k ,q
(3)
(7)
The quantities Z,
and
are given by the
equations
(4)
Z k q , =
and
Bk1k2 k3k4 = k2 k1 H , k1 k3
11
0
~
Ak1k2 k3k4 = Ak1k 2 k3k 4 E k1 + E k 2 k1k 2 k 3k 4
g d 1E i
bkq, g = d +1E i
G011 kq , =
v
m k q G 11 k kq, + G 21 k kq ,
2 k
b g b
(8a)
Here
refers to averaging with respect to
the BCS ground state. But in place of BCS
ground state one has correlated ground state
which corresponds to a generalized quasi
particle RPA22.
Taking interaction one solves the
system equation in the representation. One
obtains coupling equation for G11 and G21
also for G22 and G21. One obtains
g bk kq, g + G bk kq, g
k ,q , = v n k , q G
11
21
(8b)
b g bk kq, g + G bk kq, g
k ,q , = v l k , q G
11
21
(8c)
The quantities m(k,q), n(k,q) and l(k,q) are
combination of uk and vk and is given by
m k , q = uk v k + q + v k uk + q
b g
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
(9a)
119
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013)
n k , q = uk uk + q + v k v k + q
(9b)
vk vk + q
(9c)
b g
lb k , q g = u u
k
k +q
and
uk2 = 1 vk2 =
1+ k
2
Ek
LM
N
OP
Q
(9d)
Where
k =k + vkHF
E k = 2k + 2k
(9e)
(12)
where (q) denotes the eigen value for the
collective excitation.
Multiplying
in
equation
(7)
subsequently with m with n and in equation
1 + vI E , n ,n ( q, )
vI ,n ,l ( q, )
vI E ,n ,m ( q, )
vI ,n ,l ( q, ) 1 + vI E ,l ,l ( q, ) 2vI ,l , m ( q, )
v
v
I ,n ,l ( q, ) 1 + vI E ,m, m ( q, )
I E , n ,m ( q, )
2
2
F
G
GG Z
H
l ,q ,
I FG vnbk , qgG
JJ = G vlbk , qgG
JK GH v 2mbk , qgG
11
0
11
0
11
0
I
JJ
JK
(10)
I a ,b ,c =
k
b gb gb g
d E i
2
k ,q
(11)
L 1 m OP
bq g = M1 v
N k Q
F
12
kF
q
m
(13)
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013) 120
Strong coupling limit
Now, from equation (12) one can
expand the determinant of the collective
modes for small -q and - limit with
respect to small gap. In the strong coupling
limit the gap goes to zero with density.2 One
expands the gap equation in terms of 2
v
dk
1=
2 0
n=
1 2
J2
2
F1 + I
GH JK
2
12
v
1
2
1
v
v2
v
=
dk
dk
J1
J3
3
2 0
k
4 0
2
4
k
b *g
12
(14)
Here one has introduced integral Ji. It has
been evaluated for the strong coupling limit
i.e. for *<O. Here * is effective chemical
potential including the quasi particle shift
Ji = dk =
0
FG k + IJ
H 2m K
2
mv 2
= E0
4
Ji 2 = dk =
0
(15a)
k2
FG k + IJ
H 2m K
2
(15b)
Then
bg
J1 = m
/ 2
12
e j
= m / e2 j
= 3m / e2 j
12
12
72
32
52
(15c)
(17)
(18)
q = cq
12
J3
2 12
2
3
m v
mv 2 nv
8
64
8
2* =
J2
(16)
(19a)
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
121
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013)
L vn O
bq g = M P
N 4m Q
12
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
(19b)
Introducing the pair mass mB = 2m and the
pair density nB = n/2 the above expression
reduces to
L vn OP
bq g = M
N 4m Q
B
12
(19c)
Equation 19(c) is the well known
Bogoliubov dispersion relation for the
weakly interacting Bose gas24,25 in the limit
of small q which is linear in q i.e. phonon
like. Thus starting from interacting fermions
with an attractive interaction the quasi
particle RPA in the strong coupling limit
yields the dispersion relation for weakly
interesting gas of bosons (two particle bound
states). The magnitude of the repulsive
interaction among the bosons in equation
19(c) is given by the fermionic interaction
strength v and is consistent with the result of
Hanssmann26 and others.27-32
Table T1
An Evauated results of collective mode for
small momenta q in the weak coupling limit
(*=3.386 E0) The numerical solution is
compared with weak coupling expansion (13).
/
q/kF
Numerical solution
Equation (12)
Weak coupling
expansion eq. (13)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.00
0.126
0.268
0.355
0.568
0.573
0.626
0.645
0.689
0.735
0.794
0.00
0.132
0.275
0.368
0.599
0.702
0.925
1.027
1.146
1.207
1.258
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013) 122
=q2/2mB. We observe that the numerical
solution starts linearly in q and is consistent
with the strong coupling expansion gives in
equation 19(c). This confirms the
interpretation of the collective excitations in
the strong coupling limit as Bogoliubov
sound modes of the two particle Bose gas
that is formed in the limit. The free particle
solution reached the full solution for large q.
Some recent33-37 calculations also reveal the
same type of behavior.
Table T2
An Evauated results of collective mode for
small momenta q in the strong coupling limit
(*=(-)0.4966 E0) The numerical solution
[eq.(12)] is compared to the strong coupling
expansion [eq.(19c)] and free particle dispersion
=q2/2mB(a0 = Bohr radius)
/0
q/a0
Numerical
Solution
Eq.(12)
Strong
expansion
eq.(19c)
Free particle
dispersion
= q2/2mB
0
0.02
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.15
0.20
0.000
0.0022
0.0032
0.0034
0.0037
0.0038
0.0042
0.0048
0.0052
0.0056
0.0062
0.0094
0.0126
0.000
0.0020
0.0032
0.0035
0.00355
0.00362
0.00375
0.00382
0.00397
0.00416
0.00438
0.00469
0.00525
0.000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0005
0.00282
0.00294
0.00307
0.00322
0.00375
0.00400
0.00425
0.00473
0.00098
REFERENCES
1. M. Gaudui, Phys. Lett. B 24, 55 (1967).
2. R.M. Quick, C. Esebagg and M. de
Llano, Phys. Rev. B 47, 11512 (1993).
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)
123
Pradhan Durga Shankak Prasad, et al., J. Pure Appl. & Ind. Phys. Vol.3 (2), 116-123 (2013)
515 (2002).
31. D.A. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. B 70, 104503
(2004).
32. M. Hermele, T.Senthil and Matthew P.F.
Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104404 (2005).
33. M. M. Parish, F. M. Marchetti, A.
Lamacraft and B. D. Simons, Nature
Phys. 3, 124 (2007).
34. J. T. Stewart, J. P. Gaebeler and D. S.
Jin, Nature (London) 454,744 (2008).
35. M. Sato, Y. Takahashi and S. Fujimoto,
Phys. Rev. Lett. (PRL) 103, 020401
(2009).
36. M.Z. Hasan and C. L. Krane, Rev. Mod.
Phys.82, 3045 (2010).
37. J. D. Sau, R. Sesrama, S. Powell, I. B.
Spielman and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev.
B83, 140510 (2011).
Journal of Pure Applied and Industrial Physics Vol.3, Issue 2, 1 April, 2013, Pages (68-192)