Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Mechanical Engineering, St. Mother Theresa Engineering College, Vagaikulam, Thoothukudi 628 102, Tamilnadu, India
Centre for Manufacturing Sciences, National Engineering College, Kovilpatti 628 503, Tamilnadu, India
c
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, V.V. College of Engineering, Tisayanvilai 627 657, Tamilnadu, India
d
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Renganayagi Varatharaj College of Engineering, Sivakasi 626 128,TamilNadu, India
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 19 July 2012
Accepted 8 September 2012
Available online 28 September 2012
Keywords:
Metalmatrix composite
Solid lubricants
Sliding wear
Wear testing
a b s t r a c t
In this experimental study, aluminium (Al)-based graphite (Gr) and silicon carbide (SiC) particlereinforced, self-lubricating hybrid composite materials were manufactured by powder metallurgy. The
tribological and mechanical properties of these composite materials were investigated under dry sliding
conditions. The results of the tests revealed that the SiC-reinforced hybrid composites exhibited a lower
wear loss compared to the unreinforced alloy and AlGr composites. It was found that with an increase in
the SiC content, the wear resistance increased monotonically with hardness. The hybridisation of the two
reinforcements also improved the wear resistance of the composites, especially under high sliding
speeds. Additionally, the wear loss of the hybrid composites decreased with increasing applied load
and sliding distance, and a low friction coefcient and low wear loss were achieved at high sliding speeds.
The composite with 5 wt.% Gr and 20 wt.% SiC showed the greatest improvement in tribological performance. The wear mechanism was studied through worn surface and wear debris analysis as well as
microscopic examination of the wear tracks. This study revealed that the addition of both a hard reinforcement (e.g., SiC) and soft reinforcement (e.g., graphite) signicantly improves the wear resistance
of aluminium composites. On the whole, these results indicate that the hybrid aluminium composites
can be considered as an outstanding material where high strength and wear-resistant components are
of major importance, predominantly in the aerospace and automotive engineering sectors.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
There is an increasing worldwide need for advanced lightweight materials with particular properties [1]. Light weight metal
matrix syntactic foams and metal matrix composites (especially
aluminium composites) have the potential to be used as replacements for steel and cast irons components [2,3]. A key challenge
for lightweight materials is the ability to produce an efcient component at acceptable mechanical properties [46]. The outcome of
such studies raised awareness of the promising application prospects. In this context, Aluminium Powder Metallurgy (P/M) can
provide components with excellent mechanical and fatigue properties, low density, corrosion resistance, high thermal and electrical conductivity and excellent machinability [6,7]. The primary
driver for the use of aluminium P/M is the unique properties of
aluminium relating to the ability to produce complex net or near
Corresponding author. Address: 57/D, Vannar 2nd street, Melashunmugapuraam, Thoothukudi 628 003, Tamilnadu, India. Tel.: +91 0461
2328915, mobile: +91 9842160709.
E-mail addresses: energyravindran@gmail.com, sweetravindran@yahoo.com,
ravi@mtec.ac.in (P. Ravindran).
0261-3069/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.015
562
Table 1
Details of reinforcements.
Reinforcement
Density (g/cm3)
SiC
Gr
53
53
3.22
2.092.23
Fig. 1. Particle size distribution of (a) as-received SiC powder and (b) as-received Gr
powder.
563
Fig. 2. SEM micrographs of as-received: (a) Aluminium powders, (b) SiC particles, (c) Gr particles.
Table 2
Chemical composition of the matrix alloy.
Element
Content%
Cu
4.0
Mg
1.8
Fe
0.5
Mn
0.25
Si
0.5
Cr
0.25
Zn
0.2
Al
Balance
2.2. Sintering
Sintering of powder sequentially involves the establishment
and growth of bonds between the particles of powder at their areas
of contact and migration of the grain boundaries formed at the
bonds [11]. The coated compacts were sintered in an electric mufe furnace at a closely regulated temperature of 530 C for 60 min
as suggested by Yamagushi et al. [25] and allowed to get cooled to
room temperature in the furnace itself. At last, in order to reach to
the proper shape and size, all the compacts were trimmed to the
exact size with a diameter of 8 mm and a height of 30 mm. The
ends of the specimens were sequentially polished with abrasive
paper of grades 600, 800 and 1000. The density of the composite
specimens was determined using a high precision digital electronic
weighing balance with an accuracy of 0.0001 g by using Archimedes principle. Hardness of sintered compacts were performed in
Brinell scale with a ball diameter of 2.5 mm and a load of 30 kg.
Table 3 shows the mechanical properties of the samples.
Table 3
Mechanical properties of the samples.
S. No
Composition (wt.%)
Density (g/cm3)
Hardness (BHN)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
2.83
2.79
2.84
2.87
2.92
2.94
52
48
53
56
58
63
2024
2024/5 wt.%
2024/5 wt.%
2024/5 wt.%
2024/5 wt.%
2024/5 wt.%
of
of
of
of
of
Gr composite
Gr/5 wt.% of SiC hybrid composite
Gr/10 wt.% of SiC hybrid composite
Gr/15 wt.% of SiC hybrid composite
Gr/20 wt.% of SiC hybrid composite
564
Fig. 3. Optical micrographs of the produced composites. (a) Al 2024, (b) Al 2024/5%Gr, (c) Al 2024/5%Gr/5% SiC, (d) Al 2024/5% of Gr/10%SiC, (e) Al 2024/5%Gr/15%SiC, (f) Al
2024/5%Gr/20%SiC.
565
of higher density reinforcements of SiC. Fig. 5 also shows the variation of hardness of the iron composite with increased SiC content. It can be understood from Fig. 5 that the hardness of the
composites was improved with the increase in weight percent of
SiC reinforcements. The increase in hardness of hybrid composite
is owing to the following reasons (i) high hardness of SiC reinforcement particles. (ii) Uniform distribution of SiC in the composites.
(iii) The increased density that contributes to the increase in
hardness.
566
Fig. 6. Variation of the co-efcient of friction of Al 2024 and hybrid composites with (a) weight percentage of SiC, (b) sliding speed, (c) applied load (d) sliding distance.
with other composites. This effect is caused by the hard SiC particles, which are released during sliding and form a mechanically
mixed layer at the contact surfaces [16,26].
3.9. Wear mechanism
The SEM micrographs of the worn surface of Al 2024 and the
composite specimens slide at load of 20 N are shown in Figs. 8
10. The typical SEM micrographs of worn surface morphology of
Al 2024 matrix at are shown in Fig. 8. The worn surface of the Al
2024 matrix (Fig. 8a and b) clearly exhibits the presence of deep
permanent grooves, micro cutting, grain pullouts and fracture of
the oxide debris, which may have caused the increase of wear loss.
This morphology shows that the Al 2024 matrix has undergone signicant severe plastic deformation. However, the worn surfaces of
the other composites (Figs. 9 and 10) exhibit ner grooves and
slight plastic deformation at the edges of the grooves. As the SiC
weight fraction increases the surface morphologies also have been
changed. The surfaces also appear to be smooth because of the
graphite reinforcement content. The worn surface morphology of
the Al5%Gr composite is shown in Fig. 9a and b. The worn surface
of Al5%Gr composite was smooth with less grooves due to the
lubrication effect of graphite. The general wear pattern seems to
be ploughing out of the material from the surface. The grooves
were very ne and the plastic deformation at the edge of grooves
was fewer. Fig. 10a and b shows very small size microcrystal of
graphite particles with smaller amounts of oxide particles at the
worn surface. Also these loose particles are tightly packed with
themselves. It forms an adherent lm over the contact surfaces.
567
Fig. 7. Variation of wear loss of Al 2024 and hybrid composites with (a) weight percentage of SiC, (b) sliding speed, (c) sliding distance, (d) applied load.
Fig. 8. SEM morphologies of the worn surface of Al 2024 matrix at applied load of 20 N. (a) Low-magnication micrograph and (b) high-magnication micrograph.
Fig. 9. SEM morphologies of the worn surface of Al/5%Gr composite at applied load of 20 N. (a) Low-magnication micrograph and (b) high-magnication micrograph.
568
Fig. 10. SEM morphologies of the worn surface of Al/5% of Gr/20%SiC composite at applied load of 20 N. (a) Low-magnication micrograph and (b) high-magnication
micrograph.
Fig. 11. SEM micrographs of the collected debris (a) Al 2024, (b) Al/5%Gr (c) Al/5%Gr/5%SiC (d) Al/5% of Gr/10%SiC (e) Al/5%Gr/15%SiC (f) Al/5%Gr/20%SiC.
569
Fig. 12. Optical micrographs of the worn surface of disc mated with Al2024 matrix with a speed of 1.5 m/s at (a) applied load of 10 N and (b) applied load of 20 N.
Fig. 13. Optical micrographs of the worn surface of disc mated with Al5%Gr10%SiC composite with a speed of 1.5 m/s at (a) applied load of 10 N and (b) applied load of
20 N.
Fig. 14. Optical micrographs of the worn surface of disc mated with Al5%Gr20%SiC composite with a speed of 1.5 m/s at (a) applied load of 10 N and (b) applied load of
20 N.
clear from Fig. 11cf that the wear debris from the Al/SiC/Gr hybrid
composites is smaller than the debris from the Al/5Gr composite
because the SiC particles scattered in the aluminium matrix can
minimise the mean size of the wear particles and form the
mechanically mixed layer. Furthermore the wear debris in the hybrid composite seems to be loose in nature and non-adherent because of the hard SiC particles. The wear debris particles
observed in Fig. 11a and b are larger and shaped like thin sheets.
However, the wear debris of the hybrid composite consists of a
combination of ne and coarse powders with irregular shapes. As
shown in Fig. 11e and f, the composite with 15% SiC has larger strip
debris than the composite with 20% SiC content because of graphite self lubrication and high SiC content which increase the severity
of microcutting effects [6,14]. Therefore, the morphology and size
of the wear debris is dictated by the amount of SiC content in
the composite.
shown in Figs. 1214. All the images are observed to be asymmetrical, rough and exhibiting deep grooves while sliding against their
pin. The worn surface of disc mated with Al2024 matrix with a
speed of 1.5 m/s is shown in Fig. 12a and b. From the microstructure it is observed that the grooves are more in depth than the surface of the other worn out surfaces. The worn surface of disc mated
with Al5%Gr20%SiC composite with a speed of 1.5 m/s is shown
in Fig. 14a and b. It shows the small wear grooves and a mixture of
rough and relatively large smooth regions. This reduces the tendency of fracture wear and hence low wear loss. Conversely, specimen containing graphite forms a solid lubrication with aluminium
matrix and increases the hardness which decreases the wear loss
with increase in sliding distance [14]. Increasing applied load from
10 to 20 N is marginally increasing depth of grooves and thickness
of graphitic lm on the disk surfaces which is evident from the
optical micrographs Figs. 1214.
4. Conclusions
570