Sie sind auf Seite 1von 38

Water Supply Systems

Lecture notes 2

dr Patryk Wjtowicz

Monday 1 December 14

Contents
Design considerations - key parameters
Water demand calculations:
estimation of base water demand
water demand forecasting
peaking factors
leakage and unaccounted-for water
water for fire protection
Monday 1 December 14

Design considerations

The design considerations of water supply systems involve topographic


features of terrain and economical parameters (restrictions)

Some essential parameters for network sizing are:

the projection of residential, commercial and industrial water


demand

per capita water consumption


peak flow factors
minimum and maximum pipe sizes
pipe material
system safety and reliability requirements
selection of optimal design period of a water distribution system
in a pre-decided time horizon

Monday 1 December 14

Water demand

The estimation of water demand for the sizing of any water


supply system or its components is the most important part of
the design methodology

Water demands (water duties) are generated from:

residential
industrial and commercial developments
community facilities and services

Customer
demand

firefighting demand
account for system losses (unaccounted-for water or UFW)
periodical flushing
treatment facility water demand

Monday 1 December 14

Water demand

Water demand is not constant, and is affected by a number of factors:

climate
economic and social factors
water pricing, completeness of meterage, system management
land use
resort to private supplies
population and type of a city
standard of living, extent of sewage system
industrialization of the area (size and type)...

A comprehensive study should estimate water demand considering all the


site-specific factors
Variations of water demand are observed in different time horizons (i.e. year,
month, day, hour)

Monday 1 December 14

Historical water consumption in Poland


1965-2005

Monday 1 December 14

Historical water consumption in households in


Poland 1953-2005

Monday 1 December 14

Monthly water consumption variations


(for a selected Polish city)

Monday 1 December 14

Example of average daily water consumption


variations throughout a year
(for a selected Polish city)

Monday 1 December 14

Diurnal water variation in water demand


(for a selected Polish city)

Monday 1 December 14

Table 4.3 Calculation of nodal demands using pattern multipliers


Time

Pattern
Multiplier

Demand

1:00

1.1

200 gpm 1.1 = 220 gpm

2:00

1.8

200 gpm 1.8 = 360 gpm

As one can imagine, usage patterns are as diverse as the customers themselves. Figure
4.11 illustrates just how different diurnal demand curves for various classifications
can be. A broad zoning classification, such as commercial, may contain differences
significant enough to warrant the further definition of subcategories for the different
types of businesses being served. For instance, a hotel may have a demand pattern that
resembles that of a residential customer. A dinner restaurant may have its peak usage
during the late afternoon and evening. A clothing store may use very little water,
regardless of the time of day. Water usage in an office setting may coincide with coffee breaks and lunch hours.
Figure 4.11
Demand Multiplier

system-wide diurnal curve can be constructed using the same mass balance techques discussed earlier in this chapter. The only elaboration is that the mass balance
performed as a series of calculations, one for each hydraulic step of an EPS simulaon.

Time

Time

Factory

Restaurant

Demand Multiplier

ime Increments. The amount of time between measurements has a direct corretion to the resolution and precision of the constructed diurnal curve. If measureents are only available once per day, then only a daily average can be calculated.
ikewise, if measurements are available in hourly increments, then hourly averages
an be used to define the pattern over the entire day.

the modeler tries to use a time step that is too small, small errors in tank water level
an lead to large errors in water-use calculations. This type of error is explained furer in Walski, Lowry, and Rhee (2000). Modeling of hydraulic time steps smaller
an one hour is usually only justified in situations in which tank water levels change
pidly. Even if facility operations (such as pump cycling) occur frequently, it may
1 December
illMonday
be acceptable
for14
the demand pattern time interval to be longer than the hydraulic

Single Family

Demand Multiplier

Developing System-Wide Diurnal Curves

Businesses
Demand Multiplier

Diurnal curve for


different user
categories

Time

Time

Monday 1 December 14

Monday 1 December 14

Monday 1 December 14

Monday 1 December 14

Water demand forecasting


Forecasting is made for different time horizons:
current (actual) water demand - prepared for
164

Water Consumption

Chapter 4

existing water networks, based on trends in


historical data
Figure 4.13

Several methods for


projecting future
demands

5.0

4.5

4.0
Peak Day Demand, MGD

average-term forecast
long-term forecast

Constant Percent Growth

Growth to Buildout

3.5

Linear Growth

3.0

Economic Downturn

2.5
Annual Demand Data
2.0

1.5
1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

2030

2040

Time, year

Different methods for projecting future demands

Average- and long-term forecasts are mainly based


on unit water demands (index method)
Disaggregated Projections

Rather than basing projections on extrapolation of flow rate data, it is somewhat more
rational to examine the causes of demand changes and then project that data into the
future. This technique is called disaggregated projection. Instead of predicting
demands, the user predicts such things as industrial production, number of hotel
rooms, and cost of water, and then uses a forecasting model to predict demand.
The simplest type of disaggregated demand projection involves projecting population
and per capita demand separately. In this way, the modeler can, for example, separate
the effects of population growth from the effects of a decrease in per capita consumption due to low-volume fixtures and other water conservation measures.

Monday 1 December 14

These types of approaches attempt to account for many variables that influence future
demands, including population projections, water pricing, land use, industrial growth,
and the effects of water conservation (Vickers, 1991; and Macy, 1991). The IWR-

Population projection formulas


Arithmetic (recommended for cities up to 20 000):
i + t
Pf = Pc 1+

100

Geometric (recommended for cities up to 20 000):


i

Pf = Pc 1+
100

Exponential (recommeded for cities from 20 000):


Pf - future population
Pc - current population
i - growth rate in %
t - time in years
Monday 1 December 14

Pf = Pc + e

i+t

100

Water demand forecasting


To capture variability of water demand there are several
characteristic parameters describing water consumption
and usage

Average day water demand Qavd expressed in m3/d:


Q avd

Q year
3
=
, m /d
365

Maximum day water demand Qmaxd (m3/d)


Q maxd = Q avd N d
where: Nd - daily peaking factor

Monday 1 December 14

Daily and hourly peaking factors


(Polish regulations)

Monday 1 December 14

Calculation of water demand (cont.)

Peak hour water demand Q


(typically expressed in
Q maxh

3
dm /s

Q maxd
= Nh
24

where: Nh - hourly peaking factor

Monday 1 December 14

or

maxh
3
m /h):

Water demand
The residential forecast of future demand

is usually based on house count, census records and


population projections

The industrial and commercial facilities


have a wide range of water demand

This demand can be estimated based on historical


data from the same or comparable other system

Planning guidelines provided by engineering

bodies, governmental and regulatory agencies


should also be considered

Monday 1 December 14

Water demand

The firefighting demand can be estimated using equations


(Kuichling or Freeman formula) or according to local guidelines
or design codes in national firefighting regulations

Estimation of water losses is not straightforward and


depends on a number of factors:

age of system
minimum prescribed pressure
maximum pressure in the system
pipeline material
quality of pipeline materials and maintenance works
specific local conditions (mine damages, earthquakes) ...

Monday 1 December 14

Calculation of residential water demand


(Polish regulations)

Monday 1 December 14

Typical water duties in USA


TABLE 3.2

Typical Water Duties

Land Use

Water Duty, (gal/day/acre)


Low
High
Average

Low-density residential

400

3300

1670

Medium-density residential

900

3800

2610

High-density residential

2300

12000

4160

Single-family residential

1300

2900

2300

Multifamily residential

2600

6600

4160

Office commercial

1100

5100

2030

Retail commercial

1100

5100

2040

Light industrial

200

4700

1620

Heavy industrial

200

4800

2270

Parks

400

3100

2020

Schools

400

2500

1700

Source: Adapted from Montgomery Watson study of data of 28 western U.S. cities.
Note: gal X 3.7854 = L.

Monday 1 December 14

TABLE 3.3

Typical Rates of Water Use for Various Establishments

seats in a restaurant) and multiply by the typical unit flow to determine the average
daily flow from that establishment.

Typical
of water
wateruse
use
various
Typical rates
rates of
forfor
various
establishments
establishments
in (USA)
USA
Table 4.1 provides typical unit loads for a number of different types of users. Ranges
are given because there is considerable variation between establishments within a
given category.
Table 4.1 Typical rates of water use for various establishments
Range of Flow
User

(l/person or unit/day)

(gal/person or unit/day)

Airport, per passenger

1020

35

Assembly hall, per seat

610

23

Bowling alley, per alley

60100

1626

Pioneer type

80120

2132

Childrens, central toilet and bath

160200

4253

Day, no meals

4070

1118

Luxury, private bath

300400

79106

Labor

140200

3753

Trailer with private toilet and bath,


per unit (2 1/2 persons)

500600

132159

Resident type

300600

79159

Transient type serving meals

60100

1626

Apartment house on individual well

300400

79106

Apartment house on public water supply,


unmetered

300500

79132

Boardinghouse

150220

4058

Hotel

200400

53106

120200

3253

Motel

400600

106159

Private dwelling on individual well or


metered supply

200600

53159

Private dwelling on public water


supply, unmetered

400800

106211

40100

1126

Camp

Country clubs

Dwelling unit, residential

Lodging house and tourist home

Factory, sanitary wastes, per shift

Table extracted from Ysuni, 2000 based on Metcalf and Eddy, 1979

Monday 1 December 14

Typical rates of water use for various establishments


in USA (cont.)
148

Water Consumption

Chapter 4

Table 4.1 (cont.) Typical rates of water use for various establishments
Range of Flow
User

(l/person or unit/day)

(gal/person or unit/day)

Fairground (based on daily attendance)

26

12

Average type

400600

106159

Hospital

7001200

185317

Office

4060

1116

Picnic park, with flush toilets

2040

511

Average

2540

711

Kitchen wastes only

1020

35

Short order

1020

35

Short order, paper service

48

12

Bar and cocktail lounge

812

23

Average type, per seat

120180

3248

Average type, 24 h, per seat

160220

4258

Tavern, per seat

60100

1626

Service area, per counter seat (toll road)

10001600

264423

Service area, per table seat (toll road)

600800

159211

Day, with cafeteria or lunchroom

4060

1116

Day, with cafeteria and showers

6080

1621

Boarding

200400

53106

10003000

264793

First 7.5 m (25 ft) of frontage

16002000

423528

Each additional 7.5 m of frontage

14001600

370423

4060

1116

Indoor, per seat, two showings per day

1020

35

Outdoor, including food stand, per car


(3 1/3 persons)

1020

35

Institution

Restaurant (including toilet)

School

Self-service laundry, per machine


Store

Swimming pool and beach, toilet and shower


Theater

Table extracted from Ysuni, 2000 based on Metcalf and Eddy, 1979

Monday 1 December 14

Other investigators have linked water use in nonresidential facilities to the Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for each industry as shown in Table 4.2. To use
this table, the modeler determines the number of employees in an industry and multi-

Unit (average) water demand for industrial facilities


according to the population (Poland)

Monday 1 December 14

Average rates of nonresidential water use from


establishment-level data in USA (according to SIC
code)
Section 4.1

Baseline Demands

Table 4.2 Average rates of nonresidential water use from establishment-level data
Category

SIC Code

Construction
General building contractors

15

31

246

118

66

Heavy construction

16

20

30

17

25

150

164

2790

Food and kindred products

20

469

252

Textile mill products

22

784

20

Apparel and other textile products

23

26

91

Lumber and wood products

24

49

62

Furniture and fixtures

25

36

83

Paper and allied products

26

2614

93

Printing and publishing

27

37

174

Chemicals and allied products

28

267

211

Petroleum and coal products

29

1045

23

Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products

30

119

116

Leather and leather products

31

148

10

Stone, clay, and glass products

32

202

83

Primary metal industries

33

178

80

Fabricated metal products

34

194

395

Industrial machinery and equipment

35

68

304

Electronic and other electrical equipment

36

95

409

Transportation equipment

37

84

182

Instruments and related products

38

66

147

Miscellaneous manufacturing industries

39

36

55

50

226

68

Transportation and public utilities


Railroad transportation

40

Local and interurban passenger transit

41

26

32

Trucking and warehousing

42

85

100

U.S. Postal Service

43

Water transportation

44

353

10

Transportation by air

45

171

17

Transportation services

47

40

13

Communications

48

55

31

Electric, gas, and sanitary services

49

51

19

53

751
518

Wholesale trade

Monday 1 December 14

Sample
Size

Special trade contractors


Manufacturing

(SIC) Standard Industrial Classification

Use Rate
(gal/employee/day)

Wholesale tradedurable goods

50

46

Wholesale tradenondurable goods

51

87

233
Table from Dziegielweski, Opitz, and Maidment, 1996

149

Average rates of nonresidential water use from


establishment-level data (cont.)
150

Water Consumption

Chapter 4

Table 4.2 (cont.) Average rates of nonresidential water use from establishment-level data
Category

SIC Code

Use Rate
(gal/employee/day)
93

1044

52

35

56

Retail trade
Building materials and garden supplies

Sample
Size

General merchandise stores

53

45

50

Food stores

54

100

90

Automotive dealers and service stations

55

49

498

Apparel and accessory stores

56

68

48

Furniture and home furnishings stores

57

42

100

Eating and drinking places

58

156

341

Miscellaneous retail

59

132

161

192

238

Finance, insurance, and real estate


Depository institutions

60

62

77

Nondepository institutions

61

361

36

Security and commodity brokers

62

1240

Insurance carriers

63

136

Insurance agents, brokers, and service

64

89

24

Real estate

65

609

84

Holding and other investment offices

67

290

137

1878

Services
Hotels and other lodging places

70

230

197

Personal services

72

462

300

Business services

73

73

243

Auto repair, services, and parking

75

217

108

Miscellaneous repair services

76

69

42

Motion pictures

78

110

40

Amusement and recreation services

79

429

105

Health services

80

91

353

Legal services

81

821

15

Educational services

82

110

300

Social service

83

106

55

Museums, botanical, zoological gardens

84

208

Membership
Section
4.1 organizations

86

212

45

Engineering and management services

87

58

Services, NEC

89

73

60

106

25

Public administration

Baseline Demands

Executive,
legislative,
and general
91
155from establishment-level
2
Table
4.2 (cont.)
Average
rates of nonresidential
water use
data
Justice, public order, and safety
Category
Administration of human resources

Environmental quality and housing

92
SIC Code
94

18
Use Rate
(gal/employee/day)
87

4Sample
6Size

95

101Table from Dziegielweski, Opitz, and


6 Maidment, 1996

Administration of economic programs

96

274

National security and international affairs

97

445

Table from Dziegielweski, Opitz, and Maidment, 1996

Monday 1 December 14

Unaccounted-For Water
Ideally, if individual meter readings are taken for every customer, they should exactly

151

Average water demand for selected commercial facilities


(Poland)

Monday 1 December 14

Unaccounted-For Water (UFW)

Ideally, if individual meter readings are taken for every customer,


they should exactly equal the amount of water that is measured
leaving the treatment facility

In practice not all of the outflows are metered. These lost flows
are referred to as unaccounted-for water (UFW)

The most common reasons for discrepancies are:

leakage
overflows at tanks
errors in flow measurement (under-register at low flow rates)
unmetered water usage (illegal connections, usage of fire
hydrants, blow-offs and other maintenance appurtenances)

Monday 1 December 14

Leakage

Leakage is commonly the largest component of UFW and includes:

distribution losses from supply pipes


distribution and trunk mains
services up to the meter
connections to tanks

The amount of leakage varies from system to system, but there is a general
correlation between the age of a system and the amount of UFW. Projections of
leakage must include special areas (mine damages, earthquakes etc.)

New and well maintained systems may have as little as 5% leakage, while older
systems may have 40% leakage or even higher

Other factors affecting leakage include:

system pressure (the higher the pressure, the more leakage)


burst frequencies of mains and service pipes
leakage detection and control policies

Monday 1 December 14

Estimating water leakage


For existing networks made of traditional materials

(cast iron) properly maintained leakage index may be


estimated from 0.5 m3/h km to 0.3 m3/h km

For new networks (after renovation), properly built


and maintained leakage index should not be higher
than 0.3 - 0.2 m3/h km

For water demand forecasting leakage should be

between 5% to 10% of average daily water demand

Monday 1 December 14

Estimating water leakage

Monday 1 December 14

Leak Losses for Circular Holes Under Different Pressures*


Leak Losses, gpm
Diameter
of Hole,
in.

Area of
Hole,
in.2

20

40

60

80

100

0.1

0.007

1.067

1.510

1.850

2.136

2.388

2.616

2.825

0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6

0.031
0.070
0.125
0.196
0.282

4.271
9.611
17.087
26.699
38.477

6.041
13.593
24.165
37.758
54.372

7.399
16.648
29.597
46.245
66.593

8.544
19.224
34.175
53.399
76.894

9.522
21.493
38.209
59.702
85.971

10.464
23.544
41.856
65.400
94.176

11.302
25.430
45.209
70.640
101.721

0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0

0.384
0.502
0.636
0.785
0.950
1.131
1.327
1.539
1.767
2.011
2.270
2.545
2.836
3.142

52.331
68.350
86.506
106.798
129.225
153.789
180.488
209.324
240.295
273.402
308.646
346.025
385.540
427.191

74.007
96.662
122.338
151.035
182.752
217.490
255.249
296.028
339.829
386.649
436.491
489.353
545.237
604.140

90.640
118.387
149.833
184.979
223.825
266.370
312.615
362.559
416.203
473.547
534.590
599.333
667.776
739.918

104.662
136.701
173.012
213.596
258.451
307.578
360.977
418.648
480.590
546.805
617.292
692.050
771.081
854.383

117.010
152.840
193.434
238.807
288.957
343.882
403.584
468.062
537.317
611.347
690.153
773.736
862.095
955.230

128.184
167.424
211.896
261.600
316.536
376.704
442.104
512.737
588.601
669.697
756.025
847.585
944.378
1,046.400

138.454
180.839
228.874
282.561
341.898
406.887
477.527
553.819
635.762
723.355
816.600
915.496
1,020.040
1,130.240

Leak Losses for Joints and Cracks*

Water Pressure, psi


120

140

160

180

Area3.021
of Joint
12.083
or Crack

3.204

12.816
27.186
28.835
48.331
Length,
Width, 51.263
75.518
80.098
in.108.745 in. 115.34120

200
3.337
13.509
30.395
54.036
84.431
121.581
40

Leak Losses, gpm


Water Pressure, psi
60

80

100 120 140 160 180

148.014

156.993
165.485
3.2
4.5
5.5
6.4
7.1
7.8
8.4
9.0
9.6
205.052
216.144
244.676 116 259.5196.4
273.557
1.0
9.0 11.0 12.7 14.2 15.6 16.9 18.0 19.1
302.070
320.394
337.725
1
1.0
12.7 18.0
38.2
365.505 8 387.676
408.647 22.1 25.5 28.5 31.2 33.7 36.0
434.981 1
461.367
486.323
1.0
25.5 36.0 44.1 51.0 57.0 62.4 67.4 72.1 76.5

4
510.498
541.465
570.755
592.057
627.972
661.941
* For leaks emitted from joints
and cracked service pipes, an orifice coefficient of 0.60
679.658
720.886
759.880
in the following equation:
773.299
820.208
864.575 Q = (22.796)(A)( P )
872.983
925.938
976.024
Where:
flow, in gpm;1,094.220
A = area, in in.2; P = pressure, in psi
978.707 Q = 1,038.070
1,090.470
1,156.620
1,219.180
1,208.280
1,281.570
1,350.890

1
1.0
193.325 32

* Calculated using Greeleys formula (see equation on following page).

For losses from such items as pipes or broken taps, assum


Greeleys
formulaof(used
for leakages from pipes or
orifice coefficient
Leak Losses for Joints and Copyright
Cracks*(C) 2012 American Water Works Association All Rights Reserved
Distribution0.80 and calculate flow in gallons per mi
broken
taps, assuming
from Greeleys
formula: an orifice coefficient of 0.80)
Area of Joint
or Crack

Leak Losses, gpm

Length, Width,

Water Pressure, psi

in.

in.

20

40

60

80

100 120 140 160 180 200

1.0

132

3.2

4.5

5.5

6.4

7.1

7.8

8.4

9.0

1.0

116

6.4

9.0

11.0

12.7

14.2

15.6

16.9

18.0

19.1 20.1

1.0

18

12.7

18.0

22.1

25.5

28.5

31.2

33.7

36.0

38.2 40.3

1.0

14

25.5

36.0

44.1

51.0

57.0

62.4

67.4

72.1

76.5 80.6

9.6

10.1

* For leaks emitted from joints and cracked service pipes, an orifice coefficient of 0.60 is used
in the following equation:
Q = (22.796)(A)( P )
Where: Q = flow, in gpm; A = area, in in.2; P = pressure, in psi
Monday 1 December 14

43, 767
1, 440

A# P

Where:
Q = flow, in gpm
A = the cross-sectional area of the leak, in in.2
P = pressure, in psi

No pipe installation will be accepted if the amount of mak


water is greater than that determined by the following formula

Fire protection

AWWA M31
Distribution System
Requirements for Fire
Protection

Fire storage is the amount of stored water required


to provide a specified fire flow for a specified duration

The rate of flow to be provided for fire flow is typically


dependent on the land use and varies by community

The fire flow criteria are usually given in national or


local regulations (e.g. fire marshall)

Monday 1 December 14

includes determining fire flow demands according to the ISO approach. Although the
actual water needed to fight a fire depends on the structure and the fire itself, the ISO
method yields a Needed Fire Flow (NFF) that can be used for design and evaluation
of the system. Different calculation methods are used for different building types,
such as residential, commercial, or industrial.

Fire protection water demands


(USA and Poland)

For one- and two-family residences, the needed fire flow is determined based on the
as shown in Table
distance between
Typicalstructures,
fire flow requirements
(USA)4.5.
Table 4.5 Needed fire flow for residences two stories and less
Distance Between Buildings
(ft)

Fire Flow
(gpm)

More than 100

500

31-100

750

11-30

1,000

Less than 11

1,500

For commercial and industrial structures, the needed fire flow is based on building
area, construction
is, frame or masonry construction), occupancy (such as
TABLE
3.4 Typical Fireclass
Flow (that
Requirements
a department store or chemical manufacturing plant), exposure (distance to and type
Land Use
Fire Flow Requirements, gal/m*
of nearest building), and communication (types and locations of doors and walls). The
Single-family
500-2000
formula
canresidential
be summarized as:
Multifamily residential
Commercial
Industrial
Central business district

where

1500-3000
2500-5000
0.5

NFF = 18FA

O(X + P )

3500-10,000

(4.12)

2500-15,000

NFF = needed fire flow (gpm)


Note: gal X 3.7854F= =
L. class of construction coefficient
A = effective area (ft2)
Monday 1 December 14 O = occupancy factor

Polish fire flow requirements for communities

Supplementary reading
CH3 Introduction to Water Sources. Alaska
Department of Environmetal Conservation.

Monday 1 December 14

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen