Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Source

Currency

Relevanc
e

Limitations of traditional grammar

Question
When was the information
published or posted
Has the information been
revised or updated?
Does your topic require
current information or will
older sources work as
well?
Are the links functional?
Does the information
relate to your topic or
answer your question?

Yes

No

With this source, my topic is well


supported because the data provides
the most essential for my essay; why
traditional grammar could not be the
main method on SLA

It answers one of the main questions of


this paper; what are some disadvantages
of traditional grammar. This source
provides the specific data to this
question.
This source addresses its contents to the
teaching community and students related
to education of SLA
It uses specific terms related to language
and teaching in SLA.

Who is the intended


audience?

Authority

Accuracy

Is the information at an
appropriate level?
Have you looked at a
variety of sources before
determining this is one
you will use?
Would you be comfortable
citing this source in your
research paper?
Who is the
author/publisher/source/s
ponsor?
What are the authors
credentials or
organizational affiliations?
Is the author qualified to
write on the topic?
Is there contact
information?
Does the URL reveal
anything about the author
or source?
Where does the
information come from?

Extra information
Published on 2008

Because this source supports one of the


main point of my paper
Muhammad I. Muhammad

PH.d linguist, DEPARTMENT OF


LINGUISTICS Assignment

The author is recognized linguist in the


investigation of SLA

Additional data such as, the scope,


authors affiliation, etc were taken from
other sources.
This is not the Authorss official website,
Retrieved from slidesahre.
http://www.slideshare.net/SHOAIB8054/
research-report-traditional-gramma-rvs-

functional-grammar?qid=a6d8d9ea-2b734f99-ad60fa434513a442&v=default&b=&from_sear
ch=1
Is the information
supported by evidence?
Has the information been
reviewed or referred?
Can you verify any of the
information in another
source or from personal
knowledge?

Purpose

Does the language or tone


seem unbiased and free
of emotion?
Are there spelling,
grammar or typographical
errors?
What is the purpose of
the information? Is it to
inform, teach, sell,
entertain, or persuade?
Do the authors/sponsors
make their intentions or
purpose clear?
Is the information fact,
opinion or propaganda?
Does the point of view
appear objective and
impartial?
Are there political,
ideological, cultural,
religious institutional or
personal biases?

From this website, additional information


was verified.
http://www.academia.edu/3343916/my_
Ph.D_Thesis
It is just a presentation in ppt
presentation.

This source is expository style due to


several explanations of the information.

It is a fact, because it explains specific


points of this paper.

Muhammad I. Muhammad A. (2008) Limitations of traditional grammar, retrieved from


slideshare.net.
As we know, grammar is taught in many schools as a structure, which could result in a restricted method for
the acquisition of a second language. Now on day, linguistics disagrees with this method for being a very
restricted teaching method. Muhammad Focuses his investigation on grammar scope as a general term, and
allow educators to be aware about limitations could traditional grammar be for learners by the time of second
language acquisition. The aim of this source is just to inform about traditional grammar methods limitations.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen