Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Human Resource
Management
ELEVENTH EDITION
GARY DESSLER
Chapter 9
92
FIGURE 91
Classroom
Teaching
Appraisal by
Students
Performance Appraisal:
Performance Management:
An integrated approach to
ensuring that an employees
performance supports and
contributes to the organizations
strategic aims.
93
FIGURE 92
Direction sharing
Role clarification
Goal alignment
Total Quality
The
Performance
Management
Approach
94
Appraisal Issues
Ongoing feedback
Strategic Focus
95
96
Setting Goals
SMART Goals:
Specific, and clearly state the desired results.
Guidelines for
Effective Goal Setting
Assign
Specific
Goals
Assign
Measurable
Goals
Assign
Challenging
but Doable
Goals
Encourage
Participation
97
Supervisors
The HR Department
98
appraising.
basic appraisal
techniques.
99
910
(Un)Realistic Appraisals
Motivations for Soft Appraisals
performance appraisals.
911
912
Personal competencies
1
Appraising performance
Providing feedback
How to Measure?
Generic dimensions
Actual job duties
Behavioral competencies
913
FIGURE 93
Sample
Performance
Rating Form
914
FIGURE 93
Sample
Performance
Rating Form
(contd)
Reprinted by permission of
Society for Human
Resource
Management via Copyright
Clearance Center.
FIGURE 94
915
916
FIGURE 95 Appraisal Form for Assessing Both Competencies and Specific Objectives
917
918
FIGURE 95 (continued)
FIGURE 95 (continued)
FIGURE 95 (continued)
920
Narrative Forms
Management by Objectives
(MBO)
10
Merged Methods
FIGURE 96
921
FIGURE 97
922
Note: + means better than. means worse than. For each chart, add
up the number of +s in each column to get the highest-ranked employee.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
923
924
TABLE 91
Continuing Duties
Targets
Critical Incidents
Schedule production
for plant
90% utilization of
personnel and
machinery in plant;
orders delivered on
time
Supervise
procurement of raw
materials and
inventory control
Minimize inventory
costs while keeping
adequate supplies on
hand
Supervise machinery
maintenance
No shutdowns due to
faulty machinery
FIGURE 98
AppraisalCoaching
Worksheet
925
incidents
2. Develop performance
dimensions
3. Reallocate incidents
4. Scale the incidents
5. Develop a final
Advantages of BARS
A more accurate
gauge
926
FIGURE 99
Example of a
Behaviorally
Anchored Rating
Scale for the
Dimension
Salesmanship
Skills
Clearer standards
Feedback
Independent
dimensions
Consistency
instrument
927
928
Using MBO
Setting unclear
objectives
Time-consuming
appraisal process
Problems with
MBO
goals).
5. Conducting periodic performance reviews.
Conflict with
subordinates over
objectives
929
930
TABLE 92
Appraising Performance:
Problems and Solutions
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Quality of work
Potential Rating
Scale Appraisal
Problems
Quantity of work
Creativity
Integrity
Unclear
Standards
Halo
Effect
Central
Tendency
Leniency or
Strictness
Bias
Note: For example, what exactly is meant by good, quantity of work, and so forth?
FIGURE 910
931
932
Appraising Performance:
Problems and Solutions (contd)
How to Avoid
Appraisal Problems
Similarity
Being influenced by prior performance
Rating for retention
Know
Problems
Style differences
Use the
Right Tool
Train
Supervisors
Control
Outside
Influences
Keep
a Diary
Emotional rating
Recent performance only
Friendships
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
TABLE 93
933
934
Tool
Advantages
Disadvantages
Graphic rating
scale
BARS
Difficult to develop.
Alternation ranking
Forced distribution
method
Critical incident
method
MBO
Time-consuming.
Immediate
Supervisor
Peers
Rating
Committee
935
Self-Rating
Potential
Appraisers
Subordinates
360-Degree
Feedback
936
Guidelines for
Conducting an Interview
SatisfactoryPromotable
SatisfactoryNot Promotable
Types of Appraisal
Interviews
UnsatisfactoryCorrectable
Talk in terms
of objective
work data.
UnsatisfactoryUncorrectable
937
Dont get
personal.
Encourage
the person to
talk.
Dont tiptoe
around.
Postpone action.
938
939
940
FIGURE 911
Performance
Contract
Reprinted by permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
941
942
FIGURE 912
Checklist
During the
Appraisal
Interview
standard.
Specify deficiencies relative to the standard.
Indicate employees prior opportunity for correction.
943
FIGURE 913
Source: D. Bradford
Neary, Creating a
Company-Wide, Online,
Performance
Management System: A
Case Study at TRW,
Inc., Human Resource
Management 41, no. 4
(Winter 2002), p. 495.
Reprinted by
permission of
Society for Human
Resource
Management via
Copyright
Clearance Center.
945
944
946
KEY TERMS
performance appraisal
performance management
graphic rating scale
alternation ranking method
paired comparison method
forced distribution method
critical incident method
behaviorally anchored rating
scale (BARS)
947