Comparison of Direct and Indirect Vector Control of Induction Motor PDF

B. S. Nayak.
/ International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Vol. 1, Issue. 1, Jan. 2014, ISSN XXXX-XXXX
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Vector

Control of Induction Motor
B. Srinu Naik
Abstract-Vector control is becoming the industrial standard for induction motor control. The
vector control technique decouples the two components of stator current space vector: one
providing the control of flux and the other providing the control of torque. The two components
are defined in the synchronously rotating reference frame. With the help of this control technique
the induction motor can replace a separately excited dc motor. The DC motor needs time to time
maintenance of commutator, brushes and brush holders. The main effort is to replace DC motor
by an induction motor and merge the advantages of both the motors together into variable speed
brushless motor drive and eliminate the associated problems. The squirrel cage induction motor
being simple, rugged, and cheap and requiring less maintenance, has been widely used motor for
fixed speed application. So with the implementation of vector control, induction motor replaces the
separately excited dc motor. The vector control technique is therefore a better solution so that the
control on flux and torque become independent from each other and the induction motor is
transformed from a non-linear to linear control plant. With the advent of field oriented control;
the induction motor has become an attractive option. In this report we will come to know the
concept of vector control and different types of vector control techniques available. And finally we
will be able to compare them.
Index Terms-Induction Motor, Vector Control, Speed Control, AC Motors.
1. INTRODUCTION
Modern method of static frequency conversion has liberated the induction motor from its historical role as
a fixed speed machine. The inherent advantages of adjustable frequency operation cannot be fully realized
unless a suitable control technique is employed. The choice of technique is vital in determining the overall
characteristics and performance of the drive system. Also the power converter has little excess current
capability; during normal operation the control strategy must ensure that motor operation is restricted to
the regions of high torque per ampere, thereby matching the inverter ratings and minimizing the system
loses. Overload or fault conditions must be handled by sophisticated control rather than over design.
Now a days more than 60% of all the electrical energy generated in the world is used by cage induction
machines have been mostly used at fixed speed for more than a century. On the other hand, D.C machines
have been used for variable speed applications. In DC machines mmf axis is established at 90 electrical to
the main field axis. The electromagnetic torque is proportional to the product of field flux and armature
current. Field flux is proportional to the field current and is unaffected by the armature current because of
orthogonal orientation between armature mmf and field mmf .Therefore in a separately excited DC
machine , with a constant value of field flux the torque s directly proportional to the armature current.
Hence direct control of armature current gives direct control of torque and fast response. Hence they are
Available online @ www.ijntse.com
110
B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

simple in control and offer better dynamic response inherently. Numerous economical reasons, for
instance high initial cost, high maintenance cost for commutators, brushes and brush holders of DC motors
call for a substitute which is capable of eliminating the persisting problems in dc motors. Freedom from
regular maintenance and a brushless robust structure of the three phase squirrel cage induction motor are
among the prime reasons, which brings it forward as a good substitute.
The ac induction motors are the most common motors used in industrial motion control systems, as well
as in main powered appliances. Simple and rugged design, low cost and low maintenance are some of the
main advantages of 3 phase ac induction motors. Various types of induction motors are available in the
market. Different motors are suitable for different application. The speed and torque control of 3 phase
induction motors require great understanding of the design and characteristics of these motors.
2. BRIEF THEORY OF VECTOR CONTROL (FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL)
The control of separately-excited dc machines is straightforward due to the inherent decoupled nature
between flux and torque. As a consequence, torque linearization can be obtained easily by armature current
control with constant field flux .DC motors have been widely used in high performance domains such as
robotics, rolling mills and tracking systems where fast dynamic torque control is required. AC machines are
always preferable to dc machine due to their simpler and more robust construction; there are no mechanical
commutators. However, the electrical structures of ac machines are highly nonlinear and involve
multivariable inputs and outputs. Therefore, additional effort is required to decouple and linearize the control
of these machines. In practice, intricate control algorithms are involved if ac drives have to match the
dynamic performance of dc drives. Due to advancements in microelectronics and power electronics, high
performance control of ac motors can now be implemented at a reasonable cost. This technological
breakthrough has stimulated in turn the application of sophisticated control algorithms and the widespread
use of ac drives in high performance domains. [2][22].
The realization of fast decoupling control requires that both the magnitude and phase of the machine currents
be controlled accurately. Depending on the design philosophy and the type of ac machine, there can be many
different approaches to synthesize the machine currents to provide fast decoupling control. Among the
different approaches of torque and flux decoupling control techniques, the emerging consensus is that the
method of field-orientation yields the best overall performance. The field-oriented control (F.O.C.) is by far
the most widely accepted method of control in high performance ac drive domains. While F.O.C. represents a
single, unified control concept, the application strategies, complexity of implementation and drive responses
vary with different drive motors.
In a Dc machine, a number of coils are distributed around the armature surface and inter connected to form a
closed winding. Stationary poles with dc-excited field windings or permanent magnets establish magnetic
field in which the armature rotates Current is supplied to the armature through the commutator brushes so
that the armature mmf axis is established at 90 degrees electrical to the main field axis.
111

The DC motor analogy
Where torque (T) Ia.If

And where Ia represents the torque component and If the field.
The orthogonal or perpendicular relationship between flux and mmf axes is independent of the speed of
rotation and so the electromagnetic torque of the dc motor is proportional to the product of the field flux
and armature current. Assuming negligible magnetic saturation, field flux is proportional to field current
and is unaffected by armature current because of the orthogonal orientation of the stator and rotor field.
Thus in a separately excited dc motor with constant value of field flux, torque is directly proportional to
armature current.
The principle behind the field oriented control or the vector control is that the machine flux and torque are
controlled independently, in a similar fashion to a separately excited DC machine. Instantaneous stator
currents are transformed to a reference frame rotating at synchronous speed aligned with the rotor stator or
air gap flux vectors, to produce a d-axis component current and a q-axis component current. (SRRF).In
this work, SRRF is aligned with rotor mmf space vector, the stator current space vector is split into two
decoupled components, one controls the flux and the other controls the torque respectively. [11][22]
An induction motor is said to be in vector control mode , if the decoupled components of the stator current
space vector and he reference decoupled components defined by the vector controller in the SRRF match
each other respectively..Alternatively, instead of matching the two phase currents (reference and actual) in
the SRRF, the close match can also be made in the three phase currents (reference and actual) in the
stationary reference frame. Hence in spite of induction machines non linear and highly interacting
multivariable control structure, its control has becomes easy with the help of FOC. Therefore FOC
technique operates the induction motor like a separately excitedly DC motor.
The transformation from the stationary reference frame to the rotating reference frame is done and
controlled by with reference to specific flux vector (stator flux linkage, rotor flux linkage) or magnetizing
flux linkage). In general, there exits three possibilities for such selection and hence, three vector controls.
They are stator flux oriented control, rotor flux oriented control and magnetizing flux oriented control. As
the torque producing component in this type of control is controlled only after transformation is done and
is not the main input reference, such control is known as indirect torque control. The most challenging and
112

ultimately, the limiting feature of field orientation is the method whereby the flux angle is measured or
estimated. Depending on the method of measurement, the vector control is sub divided into two sub
categories: direct vector and indirect vector control. In direct vector control, the flux measurement is done
by using flux sensing coils or the hall devices. [2][22]
FOC uses a d-q coordinates having the d-axis aligned with rotor flux vector that rotates at the stator
frequency. The particular solution allows the flux and torque to be separately controlled by the stator
current d-q components. The rotor flux is a flux of the d-axis component stator current
ids .The
developed torque is controlled by the q axis component of the stator current iqs .The decoupling
between torque and flux is achieved only if the rotor flux position is accurately known. This can be done
using direct flux sensors or by using a flux estimator.
3. TYPES OF VECTOR CONTROL TECHNIQUES OF INDUCTION MOTOR

The synchronously rotating reference frame (SRRF) can be aligned with the stator flux or rotor flux or
magnetizing flux (field flux) space vectors respectively. Accordingly, vector control is also known as
stator flux oriented control or rotor flux oriented control or magnetizing flux oriented control. Generally in
induction motors, the rotor flux oriented control is preferred. This is due to the fact that by aligning the
SRRF with the rotor flux, the vector control structure becomes simpler and dynamic response of the drive
is observed to be better than any other alignment of the SRRF.
The vector control can be classified into (i) Direct vector control and (ii) indirect vector control.
Scope of work
In vector control the dynamic performance of the induction motor improves to a great extent. The squirrel
cage induction motor behaves similar to a separately excited dc motor with control of field and torque
being independent of each other. Therefore the drive exhibits quick starting response, fat reversal response
and quick change over from one operating point to another. With proper choice of speed controller, the
drive can be further improved in terms of performance indices such as starting time, reversal time, and dip
in speed on load application, overshoot in speed on load removal, steady state speed error on load etc.
The VCIMD can be operated in two modes of operation (a) operation below base speed and (b) operation
above base speed. When the drive operates below base speed, the flux component of the stator current
(ids*) is maintained constant and torque is dependent on the torque component of the stator current (iqs*).
and when the drive operates above base speed, the flux component of stator current (ids*) is reduced for
control, with the torque component (iqs*) at the maximum possible level.
The excitation current for rotor flux (imr*) depends on the speed of the motor ( r ) in inverse proportion
for the operation of the motor above base speed.
The voltage source inverter I operated in current controlled (CC) mode. The CC mode of VSI gives a
quick and fast response as the winding currents are regulated in accordance to vector control mode of an
induction motor.
113

Normally uncontrolled ac-dc converters are used to feed vector controlled induction motor. These
uncontrolled ac-dc converters draw non-sinusoidal current from the ac mains and behave as non-linear
loads. This leads to power quality problems. But a number of techniques have been proposed for
improving power quality at ac mains.
Direct vector control method

In direct vector control method we have seen that it determines the magnitude and position of the rotor
flux vector by direct flux measurement or by a computation based on terminal conditions. It also called
flux feedback control is method in which required information regarding the rotor flux is obtained by
means of direct flux measurement or estimation. The flux is measured by the sensors like Hall Effect
sensor, search coil and this is a part of the disadvantages. Because fixing of number of sensors is a tedious
job and this increases the cost factor. [2]
The quantities generated from flux sensors are used in the outer loop of the drive control structure.
Alternatively, in place of flux sensors, the flux models can also be used for which the stator currents and
voltages become the feedback signals and he rotor flux angle is given as its estimated output.
Figure.2 shows a simplified block diagram of a field control scheme .the two axis reference currents, iqs
and ids are the demanded torque and flux components of stator current, respectively and are governed by
the outer control loops. Currents, iqs and ids , undergo a coordinate transformation to two phase stator
based quantities, followed by two phase to three phase transformation which generates the stator reference
*
currents ias ,ibs ,ics .These reference current are reproduced in the stator phases by the current controlled
PWM inverter .[2]
114

Figure-2: Basic field oriented control system for an induction motor with a current controlled PWM
inverter.
Thus the external reference currents iqs and ids are reproduced within the induction motor. Control is
executed in terms of these direct and quadrature axis current components to give decoupled control of flux
and torque as in a dc machine
Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
Fixing of number of sensors is a tedious job.

The sensors increase the cost of the machine.
Drift problem exist because of temperature.
Poor flux sensing at lower temperatures.
These disadvantages lead to another technique called in-direct vector control technique.
115

In-direct vector control Method

Figure.3 shows the basic block diagram of induction motor operating in indirect vector control mode. The
motor speed is used as feedback signal in the controller. The controller calculates reference values of the
two decoupled components of stator current space vector in the SRRF which are iqs* and ids* for the control
of torque and flux respectively. [2] The two components of the currents are transformed into three phase
currents which are ias*,ibs*,ics* in the stationary reference frame of reference. Now as a balanced load, two
of the phase currents are sensed and the third one is calculated from the two sensed currents. The current
controller controls the reference currents close to sensed three phase currents in the stationary reference
frame and operates the voltage source inverter to feed three phase induction motor. This ensures a high
level of performance of the vector controlled induction motor (VCIMD).Because of the smooth, efficient
and maintenance free operation of VCIMDs, such drives are finding increasing applications in many drive
application s such as air conditioning, refrigeration, fans blowers, pumps, waste water treatment plants
,elevators, lifts traction motors, electric vehicles, etc[2][7]
figure-3:basic block diagram of indirect vector control mode

The field-weakening controller receives the speed signal ( r ) as an input signal and provides reference
*
value of the excitation current ( imr ) as an output signal. Therefore the two signals are the reference
signals for the vector controller. In the vector controller the d-axis component ( ids ) and the q- axis
component ( iqs ) of the stator current signals are computed which are responsible for the flux and torque
*
control respectively. The slip frequency signal ( 2 ) is also computed in vector controller to evaluate
*
the flux angle. The slip angle is computed using slip frequency ( 2 ), rotor speed ( r ) and sampling
116

period ( T ).These signals of flux ( ids
and torque ( iqs ) are in the synchronously rotating reference

*
frame and these are transformed into stationary reference three phase currents ( ias ,ibs ,ics )
*
For current controlled VSI fed vector controlled induction motor, the reference currents ias ,ibs ,ics and
sensed currents ( ias,ibs,ics ) are fed into the pulse width modulated (PWM) current controller. A triangular
carrier wave is generated at the required switching frequency (fs). The point of intersection of the
triangular carrier wave and modulating signals acts as the point of state change over for the resulting
PWM signals, which are fed to the driver circuit of VSI feeding an induction motor[2][7]
The indirect vector controlled induction motor is reshown in figure.3 below with blocks consists of the
speed sensor, speed controller ,limiter, the field weakening controller , the two phase rotating frame to
three phase stationary frame converter, PWM current controller, CC-VSI and three phase squirrel cage
induction motor. The functions are described as follows
117

Speed sensor
It measures the motor speed. Since in the indirect vector, the accurate measurement of position of rotor
flux vector is given by the sensors which have high resolution and precision. Normally shaft encoders are
used for the closed loop vector control of the cage induction motor drive.
Speed controller
*
The measured speed ( r ) is compared with the set reference speed ( r ) in the error detector and the
resulting output is known as speed error ( e ) is processed in the speed controller. The output of the
controller is the control signal for the torque command ( T ). The command input may be positive or
negative depending upon the set reference speed and the motor shaft speed. The speed error ( e ) is
processesed in the speed controller which may be of different types depending upon the required dynamic
performance of the drive. And accordingly the controller is used.
When the drive operates in the transient conditions such as starting, reversing or load application or load
removal the speed controller output (T) may be very high value to achieve the steady state condition of the
drive as fast as possible, as, a result the controller output signal (T) may become quite high and in some
cases it may become higher than the breakdown torque of the motor. Such a situation may be rather
dangerous for the motor and may take the drive into instability. In order to avoid certain circumstances, it
becomes very much necessary to apply certain limit on the output of the speed controller .The output of
the speed controller after the limit is considered as the reference torque(T *) to the vector controller and
used to obtain the value of stator current torque component of the stator current space vector. As a result
the limit of the torque also ensures over current protection to the drive.
4. FIELD WEAKENING CONTROLLER

The field weakening operation of a VCIMD is similar to the field controller of a separately excited dc
motor. This operation is implemented when the drive speed is controlled above the base speed. The input
to the field weakening controller is the feedback speed of the motor. The output of the controller is the
excitation current. Below the abase speed the excitation current remains constant. Above the based speed
the excitation current varies in inverse proportion to the speed. [13-14]
imr
imr
= im
=Kf
if
im / r
imr
im
r < base speed

if
r >= base speed
Where Kf is flux constant.
is the excitation current,
is the magnetizing current,
118

r is the feedback speed of the motor,
is the base speed of the motor.
5. VECTOR CONTROLLER
*
The output of the speed controller after limiting is taken as the reference torque ( T ) and output of field
*
weakening controller ( imr ) is taken as reference flux for the vector controller. These two command
signals are taken as input to the vector controller for calculating the torque component ( iqs ) and the flux
component ( ids )
And also to calculate the slip frequency ( 2 ).The torque ( iqs ) and the flux components ( ids ) are the
*
respective decoupled components of the stator current ( is ) in the synchronously rotating reference frame.
Estimation of ids , iqs and 2
The vector controller block is the heart of the entire modeling of the vector controlled induction motor
drive. This section calculates the direct and quadrature axis stator components ( ids and iqs ) in the
synchronously rotating reference frame (SRRF) aligned with rotor inclined at flux angle ( ) with respect
to stationary reference frame. [19]
Mathematically these equations for calculating these two components of the current are given as follows:
ids n = imr
di
n + r mr
dt
.Eq(1)
T * n
i n =
..Eq(2)
*
Ki mr n
qs
n
n = i n
r mr
i qs
Eq (3)
119

Where,
r is the rotor time constant defined
as
r = L
Rr
2 p M
K=
3 2 1 r
P is the number of poles, i ds
instant,
and iqs n refer to flux and torque components of stator current at n th
2 * n
refer to nth instant reference slip frequency , M is the mutual inductance , r is the rotor
leakage factor and Lr is the rotor self inductance and is defined as
Lr Llr Llm..Eq(4)
Lr 1r M...Eq(5)
3
L
And r r 1 where M= Lm , Lm is the magnetizing inductance

2
M
Two phase rotating frame to three phase stationary frame converter
Two phase rotating frame to three phase stationary frame converter transforms the two decoupled
components of stator current namely, ( ids and iqs ) in synchronously rotating reference frame into three
*
phase currents namely ias ,ibs and ics in three phase stationary reference frame. The conversion
process requires the flux angle ( ), which is calculated by the integration of the synchronous speed.
*
Synchronous speed is obtained by addition of slip speed ( 2 ) and motor speed ( r )

Transformation equations can be written as follows:
*
ias iqs sin ids cos .........Eq(6)
*
* 1
* 1
ibs cos 3 sin i ds sin 3 cos i qs ....Eq(7)
2
2
120
ics ias ibs

*

...Eq(8)
Where ias ,ibs ,ics are the three phase currents in stator reference frame.
PWM current controller

Current control plays an important role in power electronic circuits, particularly in current regulated PWM
inverters which are widely applied in ac motor drives and continuous ac power supplies where the
objective is to produce a sinusoidal ac output. The main task of the control system in current regulated
inverters is to force the current vector in the three phase load according to a reference trajectory. In order
to operate the three phase induction motor into vector controlled mode, sensed three phase stator currents
*
(ias,ibs and ics) are to be controlled by the three phase reference currents( ias ,ibs and
technique is called current controller.
ics
). Such a control
In indirect vector control technique the rotor flux vector position is computed from the speed feedback
signal the motor. The indirect vector control eliminates the need of using flux sensors or flux model.
However it requires an accurate measurement of the shaft position in order to determine the precise
position of the rotor flux vector. The difference between the reference speed and the rotor speed is fed to
the controller. The controller computes the slip frequency that on addition to the feedback motor speed
provides the speed of the rotor flux vector from which the flux angle can be computed. The reference
currents here are reproduced in the motor winding by the current controlled inverter. Indirect control
eliminates most of the problems, which are associated with the flux sensors as the controller is free from
rotor flux sensing.
The induction motor behavior in field coordinates is given by the equations
T ki mr i qs
Eq(9)
di mr
i mr i ds
dt
...Eq(10)
i
d
mr m qs ....Eq(11)
dt
r i mr
i
d
mr m qs .Eq(12)
dt
r i mr
121

The latter equations state that the rotor flux vector has an instantaneous angular velocity,
mr which is
m and the instantaneous angular velocity of the

rotor flux relative to the rotor. If thus slip angular velocity is denoted by 2 ,
the sum of the instantaneous shaft angular velocity,
Then
i qs
r i mr
and-----------------------------------------------------------------Eq(12)
2 = mr - m = s mr
Where,
-----------------------------------------------------------Eq(13)
s is the fractional slip of the rotor with respect to the rotor flux vector.
The slip equation can be implemented in the field oriented controller so that direct measurement of the
rotor flux position is unnecessary. This approach is the basis of indirect methods of the field orientation,
which are often termed slip frequency control methods. The reference values iqs ,
demanded values of torque,
i
2
ki mr
i qs
r i mr
and
2 for
and rotor magnetizing current imr are given by
di mr
ids = imr + r
dt
qs =
ids
-------------------------------------------------------------------Eq (14)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Eq (15)
T
=
k r i mr
2 --------------------------------------------------Eq (16)
The basic implementation of a speed control system for a current controlled PWM inverter is shown in
figure .3
122

Figure-3: the basic implementation of a speed control system for a current controlled PWM inverter
The speed error is fed to the speed controller, which generates the torque command, T *.As before, the
shaft speed is fed to a function generator that demands a constant rotor magnetizing current, imr , below
base speed, and implements field weakening above base speed. The torque and flux command are used to
calculate the reference values
iqs
ids
and
2 .the commanded slip frequency is integrated to give a
slip angular position signal, 2 , which is added to the rotor position signal, , from the shaft mounted
incremental encoder to determine the rotor flux angle, .These calculations give desired accuracy and
freedom form drift. The angle is used to implement the vector rotation,
based reference currents
e jp of iqs
and
ids
to stator
Indirect field orientation is readily applied to other types of adjustable frequency inverter drive. m .In
general, indirect field orientation systems are very similar to the controlled slip frequency drives. The
traditional controlled slip frequency drives seeks to maintain a constant air gap flux, but the controlled
implementation does not preserve the proper phase relationships in the machine during the transient
conditions. The overall dynamic performance of the indirect vector control is better than direct vector
control.
123

Comparison with direct vector control

The major disadvantage of direct vector method is the need of so many sensors. Fixing so many sensors in
a machine is a tedious work as well as costlier [2]. Due to this the scheme is prevented from being used.
Several other problems like drift because of temperature, poor flux sensing at lower speeds also persists.
Due to these disadvantages and some more related ones, indirect vector control is used.
In indirect vector control technique, the rotor position is calculated from the speed feedback signal of
the motor. This technique eliminates most of the problems, which are associated with the flux sensors as
they are absent.
Here the in phase component of stator current space vector n the SRRF is aligned with the rotor mmf
vector. This component of the vector is responsible for the production of flux. In the similar fashion the
quadrature component is responsible for the production of the torque. And hence such a control technique
provides a substitute of a separately excited dc motor using a three-phase squirrel cage induction motor in
variable speed application.[2][7]
Advantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
The sensors are eliminated.

The dynamic performance of the indirect vector control is better than the direct vector control
The cost factor is decreased.
There is no drift problem as in direct vector control.
6. CONCLUSION
From the above discussion it can be concluded that the control of induction motor is very necessary as it
is the common motor used in industrial motor control systems. Hence a well established induction motor
drive which is simple, rugged, low cost and low maintenance can serve the required purpose. Many
authors have published several research papers on the vector control techniques of induction motor. And
studying vector control techniques it is clear that the indirect vector control technique supersedes the
direct vector control and is more used rather than the later one. Hence for the further work the method
adopted is the indirect vector control technique.
7. REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
I.P. Kopylov, Mathematical Models of Electric Machines, Translated from the Russian by P.S. Ivanov, Revised from
the Russian edition, 1980.
Bose B.K, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives, 4 th Edition, 2004.
Jyothi Mangaveni Chitta and Srinivasa Rao Maturu, Sensorless Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM)
For Torque Ripple Reduction, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE), Vol.
8, Issue. 1, pp. 1-7, Oct-2013.
G. Subba Reddy, Vector Controller based Speed Control of Induction Motor Drive with 3-Level SVPWM based
Inverter, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 4, pp. 1-11,
March-2013
124

[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
Mrs. Anjali.U.Jawadekar, Dr.G.M.Dhole, SRParaskar, S.S .Jadhao and M.A.Beg, Application of ANN for Induction
Motor Fault Classification Using Hilbert Transform, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 7-12, March-2013.
Niraj Kumar Shukla and Dr. S K Sinha, Fuzzy and PI Controller Based Performance Evaluation of Separately
Excited DC Motor, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1,
pp. 12-18, April-2013.
K. Anil Naik, Frequency Domain Analysis of IMC Tuned PID Controller for Synchronous Generator Excitation
System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol. 3,
Issue.1, pp. 15-19, May-2013.
Mr. Sandeep N Panchal, Mr. Vishal S Sheth and Mr. Akshay A Pandya, Simulation Analysis of SVPWM Inverter
Fed Induction Motor Drives, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2,
Issue. 4, pp. 18-22, April-2013.
Bose B.K, Power Electronics and Motor Drives, Academic Press, Imprint of Elsevier, 2006.
B.L. Theraja, A.K. Theraja, A Textbook of Electrical Technology, Vol.2.
G. Venu Madhav and Y. P. Obulesu, Artificial Neural Network Based Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generator,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 25-31, March2013.
Sourabh Jain, Shailendra Sharma and R.S. Mandloi, Improved Power Quality AC Drive Feeding Induction Motor,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 35-40, April2013
Mahesh Nandaniya, A Review Paper of Automatic Canal Gate Control of 3- Induction Motor with PLC and VFD,
Powered by Solar System and Monitoring by SCADA, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 32-39, March-2013
Vijaya kumar.M and Gunasekaran.M, Stability Analysis of FPGA Based Control of Brushless DC Motor Using
Fuzzy Logic Controller, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 4,
Issue. 1, pp. 35-40, June-2013
Shrinivas P. Ganjewar and Chandulal guguloth, Sensorless Approach for Speed Control of Induction Motor using
MRAS, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 64-67,
March-2013.
Ms. Preeti Dhiman, Deepankar Anand, Ekta Singh and Komal Grover, PC Based Speed Control of Induction Motor,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 81-84, April2013.
Annapurna Birdar and Ravindra G. Patil, Energy Conservation Using Variable Frequency Drive, International
Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 85-91, April-2013.
Prof. Khushbu L. Mishra, Prof. Dambhare S.S. and Prof. Pagire K.M, Design and Implementation of IGBT Based
Single Phase AC Drive Using PIC 18F452, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 5, Issue. 1, pp. 79-82, July-2013.
M.Sathish Kannan and S.Vasantharathna, Dynamically Reconfigurable Control Structure for Asynchronous AC
Drives, International Journal of Engineering Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol.
3, Issue 1, pp. 75-82May, 2013.
Mr. Thanikonda Yedukondalu, Dr S. Satya Narayana and M. Subba Rao, Controlling of Buck Converter Using
Different Types of Sliding Mode Controllers, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 2, pp. 1-4, Aug-2013.
G. K. Dubey, Power Semiconductor Controlled Drives, Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ, 1989.
B. K. Bose, Energy, environment, and advances in power electronics, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol. 15, pp.
688701, July 2000.
B. K. Bose (Ed.), Power Electronics and Variable Frequency Drives, IEEE Press, New York, 1996.
Dr RAMA RAO P.V.V. and Ms. N. VENUPRIYA, SPWM Based Two Level VSI for Microgrid Applications,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol. 7, Issue. 1,
pp. 3-6, Sep-2013.
J.Shankaraiah, G.Kumara Swamy and Dr.K.Sri Gowri, High Step-UP DC-DC Converter Using Cascode Technique,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 8, Issue. 1, pp. 13-18, Oct-2013.
BANOTHU THAVU, Micro Controller based Current Fed Dual Bridge DC-DC Converter, International Journal of
Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 4, pp. 24-31, March-2013.
P. Bapaiah, Improvement of Power System Stability Using HVDC Controls, International Journal of Emerging
Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 19-34, April-2013.
125

[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
Brijesh M.Patel, Minesh k. Joshi and Dhaval N. Tailor, Design and Simulation of Boost Converter for Constant
Output Voltage, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 8, Issue. 1, pp.
19-24, Oct-2013.
pavani vanga, Dr.S.Satyanarayana and M.Subbarao, Design and Analysis of Soft Switched PWM Full Bridge DC
DC Converter for Regulated Voltage, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp. 24-29, Aug-2013.
U.Vinod kumar and P.Sai Sampath Kumar, Loaded Resonant Converter for the DC to DC Energy Conversion
Applications, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 2, pp.
21-28, Aug-2013.
R. Krishnan, Electric Motor Drives, Modeling, Analysis, and Control, First Indian Reprint, Pearson Education, 2003.
A.M. Trzynadlowski, Control of Induction Motors, Academic Press, 2001.
I. Takahashi, Y. Ohmori, High-performance direct torque control of induction motor, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 25,
no. 2, pp. 257264, 1989.
Jil sutaria, Manisha shah and Chirag chauhan, Comparative Analysis of Single Phase and Multiphase Bi-Directional
DC-DC Converter, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1,
pp. 41-46, April-2013.
M.Balachandran and N.P.Subramaniam, Fuzzy Logic Controller for Z-Source Cascaded Multilevel Inverter,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp .30-34, Aug2013.
Santhosh Kumar Vasireddy and Munfar Ali G, Parallel Power Flow AC/DC Converter with Input Power Factor
Correction and Tight Output Voltage Regulation for Universal Voltage Applications, International Journal of
R. Subbarayudu, K. Kishore Reddy and Dr K. Sri Gowri, A Novel Power Converter for Integrated Traction Energy
Storage, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 2, pp. 37-45,
Aug-2013.
Dhana Prasad Duggapu, Satya Venkata Kishore Pulavarthi and Swathi Nulakajodu, Comparison between Diode
Clamped and HBridge Multilevel Inverter (5 to 15 odd levels), International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical
and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 4, pp. 66-78, March-2013.
P.Chaithanya Deepak and S. Nagaraja Rao, Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter Using Inverted Sine Wave PWM
Technique, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp. 3944, Aug-2013.
Dharmesh.V.Khakhkhar, Design and Simulation of Novel Integral Switching Cycle Control for Heating Load,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 5, Issue. 1, pp. 41-44, July2013.
Mukesh Gupta, Sachin Kumar and Vagicharla Karthik, Design and Implementation of Cosine Control Firing Scheme
for Single Phase Fully Controlled Bridge Rectifier, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue. 1, pp. 40-46, May-2013.
L. Sai Suman Rao and S. Nagaraja Rao, Three Level Neutral Point Clamped Back to Back Converter, International
Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp. 45-50, Aug-2013.
K.K. Dinesh kumar, K.B. Naresh kumar, S. ManiKandan and S. Venkatanarayanan, Design of Bridgeless SEPIC
Converter for Speed Control of PMDC Motor, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 64-69, April-2013.
A Mallikarjuna Prasad, S Thirumalaiah, U chaithanya and P Nagarjuna, Simulation of New Multilevel Inverter
Topology, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 6873, March-2013.
Avneet Kaur, Prof. S.K Tripathi, Prof. P. Tiwari, Study of Power Factor Correction in Single Phase AC-DC
Converter, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 5, Issue. 1, pp. 8993, July-2013.
A. M. Khambadkone and J. Holtz, Vector controlled induction motor drive with a self- commissioning scheme, IEEE
Trans. Ind. Elec., vol. 38, pp. 322327, October 1991.
P. Vas, Sensorless Vector and Direct Torque Control, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
G. S. Buja and M. P. Kazmierkowski, Direct torque control of PWM inverter-fed ac motorsa survey, IEEE IE
Trans., vol. 51, pp. 744757, August 2004.
Mr. Ambadas. S. Mane and Mr. Vijay. B. Suryawanshi, Analysis of Five Level Inverter, International Journal of
126

[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
Mashhood Hasan, Dinesh Kumar and Zafar Khan, Multimodules of Diode Clamped Multilevel Converter: A Novel
Option for High Power Facts Controller, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 109-112, April-2013.
M. M. Irfan, Simulation of High Voltage Gain Zero Voltage Switching Boost Converter, International Journal of
Engineering Trends in Electrical and Electronics( IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 88-92, May, 2013.
Mr. Ambadas S. Mane and Mr Vijay P. Mohale, Series Resonant Converter, International Journal of Emerging
Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 102-105, March-2013.
P.Marino, M.D. Incecco and N.Visciano, A comparison of Direct Torque Control Methodologies for Induction Motor,
IEEE trans. 2001.
G. Buja et al., Direct torque control of induction motor drives, IEEE ISIE Conf. Rec., pp. TU2TU8, 1997.
Burak Ozpineci, L.M.Tolbertr, Simulink Implementation of Induction Machine Model-A modular approach, IEEE
Trans. 2003.
R. H. Park, Two-reaction theory of synchronous machines-generalized method of analysis -Part 1, AIEE Trans., vol.
48, pp. 716727, July 1929.
Manju khare, Yogendra kumar, Ganga Agnihotri and V.K. Sethi, Simulation and Analysis of Maximum-PowerPoint-Tracker for Photovoltaic Arrays, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp .1-6, March-2013.
MoganapriyaKrishnakumar and PanneerselvamManickam, Modeling and Neuro-Fuzzy Control of DFIG in Wind
Power Systems for Grid Power Leveling, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol. 3, Issue.1, pp. 8-14, May-2013.
R.Dinesh kumar and P.Karuppusamy, Performance Analysis of Soft Switched Seven Level Inverter for Photovoltaic
System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol. 5,
Issue. 3, pp. 11-16, July-2013.
Devendra Singh, Gyanendra yadav, DivyaPratap Singh and GyanRanjan Gupta, Maximum Power Point Tracking For
PV Based Solar System: A Review, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE)
Vol. 3, Issue.1, pp. 29-30, May-2013.
Bhanupriya.R and Subasri.R, Nonlinear Disturbance Control in a Wind Energy Conversion System Using Theta-D
Control, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 6, Issue. 1, pp. 35-38,
Aug-2013.
Rupert Gouws and Elizbe van Niekerk, Prototype Super-capacitor Photovoltaic Streetlight with xLogic SuperRelay
Functionality, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 7, Issue. 1, pp.
34-39, Sep-2013.
Brijesh M. Patel, Kalpesh J.Chudasma, Hardik A.Shah, Simulation of Single Phase Inverter using PSIM Software for
Solar P.V. System give Constant Output Voltage at Different Solar Radiation, International Journal of Emerging
Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 4, Issue. 1, pp. 26-31, June-2013
Mrs. S. Sathana and Ms. Bindukala M.P, Hybrid Solar and Wind Power Conversion Using DFIG with Grid Power
Leveling, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 4348, March-2013.
Mr.K.Saravanan and Dr. H. Habeebullah Sait, Multi Input Converter for Distributed Renewable Energy Sources,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 51-58, April2013.
Mrs. Thivya Balasubramanian., Mr. Rajesh. T. Mr.RajaPerumal T.A, Load Sharing In A Hybrid Power System With
Renewable Energy Sources, International Journal of Engineering Trends in Electrical and Electronics ( IJETEE) Vol.
3, Issue 1, pp. 35-39, May, 2013.
K. K. Saravanan , Dr. N. Stalin and S. T. Jayasuthahar, Review of Renewable Energy Resources in Clean Green
Environment, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp.
54-58, March-2013.
S.Sathish Kumar and S. Chinnaiya, Switched Inductor Quasi-z-source Inverter for PMSG based Wind Energy
Conversion System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue. 1,
pp. 41-46, May-2013.
C.Bhuvaneswari and R.Rajeswari, Study Analysis of Hybrid Power Plant (Wind-Solar) - Vertical Axis Wind
Turbine-Giromill Darrieus Type with Evacuated Tube Collectors, International Journal of Emerging Trends in
Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 80-83, March-2013.
Deepali Sharma, Uphar Tandon, Nitin Saxena, Development of 1000W, 230volt Solar Photovoltaic Power Electronic
Conversion System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue. 1,
pp. 70-74, May-2013.
127

[71]
[72]
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92]
K.GAYATHRI, S.GOMATHI and T.SUGANYA, Design of Intelligent Solar Power System Using PSO Based
MPPT with Automatic Switching between ON grid and OFF Grid Connections, International Journal of Emerging
Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 95-97, March-2013.
D.Pugazhenthi, P.Sathishbabu and R.M.SasiRaja, A NOVEL NINE-SWITCH CONVERTER FOR SOLAR
ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEMS, International Journal of Engineering Trends in Electrical and Electronics(
IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 83-87, May, 2013.
Panchal Mehulkumar J and Ved Vyas Dwivedi, Sustainable Energy Development and Appropriate Options to Energy
Sustainability Threats in India, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol.
2, Issue. 4, pp. 83-89, April-2013.
Mr. Karthick R.T and Dr. Ashok Kumar L, Stand-Alone Solar Power Generation System with Constant Current
Discharge, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 5, Issue. 1, pp. 108114, July-2013.
Xingyi.Xu, D.W.Novotny, Implementation of Direct stator flux orientation control on versatile DSP based system,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 24, no. 4, July/August 1991.
Y.A.Chapuis, D.Roye, J.Davoine, Principles and Implementation of Direct Torque Control by stator flux orientation
of Induction Motor, IEEE Trans. 1995.
S.Vamsidhar, B.G.Fernades, Design and Development of Energy Efficient Sensor less Direct Torque Controlled
Induction Motor Drive in Real Time Simulation, The 30th Annual conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
November 2-6, 2004.
S.Vamsidhar, B.G.Fernades, Hardware-in-loop-simulation based design and experimental evaluation of DTC
strategies, 35th Annual IEEE power Electronics Special Conference, 2004.
C. Lascu, I. Boldea, F. Blaabjerg, A Modified Direct Torque Control for Induction Motor Sensor less Drive. IEEE
Tram on Ind. Appl., vol 36, No-1, 122-130, January/ February 2000.
Miss Shraddha Mehta, Miss Mital Upahaya, Miss Mita Rathod, CloudComputing: A Review, International Journal
of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 4, Issue. 2, pp. 29-31, June-2013.
Ms. Mohini Pande, Mr.Dishant Vyas, Ms.Roopakiran Yeluri and Prof.(Mrs).Suvarna K.Gaikwad, Microcontroller
Based Neural Network Controlled Low Cost Autonomous Vehicle, International Journal of Emerging Trends in
Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 2, Issue. 4, pp. 36-39, April-2013.
Arun Kumar, Munish Vashishth and Lalit Rai. Liquid level control of coupled tank system using Fractional PID
controller, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 3, Issue. 1, May2013.
RAJDEEP SINGH, KUMARI KALPNA, DAWINDAR KUMAR MISHRA, Hybrid Optimization Technique for
Circuit Partitioning Using PSO and Genetic Algorithm, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE) Vol. 4, Issue. 2, pp. 69-71, June-2013.
Hoang Le-Huy, Comparison of Field-Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for Induction Motor Drives, IEEE
Thirty-Fourth IAS Annual Meeting, 1999.
P. Z. Grabowski, M. P. Kazmierkowski, B. K. Bose, and F. Blaabjerg, A simple direct-torque Neuro-fuzzy control of
PWM-inverter-fed induction motor drive, IEEE Trans. Ind. Elec., vol. 47, pp. 863870, August 2000.
G. C. D. Sousa, B. K. Bose, and K. S. Kim, Fuzzy logic based on-line tuning of slip gain for an indirect vector
controlled induction motor drive, IEEE IECON Conf. Rec., pp. 10031008, 1993.
B. K. Bose, Expert system, fuzzy logic, and neural network applications in power electronics and motion control,
Proc. IEEE, vol. 82, pp. 13031323, August 1994.
G. C. D. Sousa, B. K. Bose, and K. S. Kim, Fuzzy logic based on-line tuning of slip gain for an indirect vector
controlled induction motor drive, IEEE IECON Conf. Rec., pp. 10031008, 1993.
B. K. Bose, Expert system, fuzzy logic, and neural network applications in power electronics and motion control,
Proc. IEEE, vol. 82, pp. 13031323, August 1994.
G.Vijayakumar and R Anita, Renewable Energy Based Shunt Compensator for Power Quality Improvement,
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1,
Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
J. Suryakumari and G. Sahiti, Analysis and Simulation of Modified Adaptive Perturb and Observe MPPT Technique
for PV Systems, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 23209569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
Danish Chaudhary, Amit Kumar Singhal, Madhur Chauhan, Analysis of Harmonic Free Voltage Regulator with
Simulation Technique, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN:
2320-9569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
128

[93]
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
[102]
[103]
[104]
[105]
[106]
[107]
[108]
[109]
[110]
[111]
M.Banupriya, R.Punitha, B.Vijayalakshmi, C.Ram Kumar, Remote Monitoring System For A Switchable
Distribution Transformer By The Use Of Wireless ZigBee Technology, International Journal of New Trends in
Electronics and Communication (IJNTEC-ISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 4, pp. 47-49, Nov. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
Aslam P. Memon, Waqar A. Khan, Riaz H. Memon, Asif Ali Akhund, Laboratory Studies of Speed Control of DC
Shunt Motor and the Analysis of Parameters Estimation, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
Aslam P. Memon, A. Sattar Memon, Asif Ali Akhund, Riaz H. Memon, Multilayer Perceptrons Neural Network
Automatic Voltage Regulator With Applicability And Improvement In Power System Transient Stability,
Aslam P. Memon, M. Aslam Uqaili, Zubair A. Memon, Asif A. Akhund, Time-Frequency Analysis Techniques for
Detection of Power System Transient Disturbances, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
V.Samba Siva Raju, *Mr. S.Srinu, Fault Detection and Mitigation in Multilevel Cascaded Converter STATCOMs,
Dhanorkar Sujata , E. Himabindu, Voltage Sag Mitigation Analysis Using DSTATCOM Under Different Faults in
Distribution System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 23209569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
Vishal Phaugat, Hari Mohan Rai, Subham Gupta and Rohit Thakran, Effect of Binder on Viscosity with Shear Rate,
Shivam Thakur, Hari Mohan Rai, Sidharth Kumar and Suman Pawar, Factors Determining the Speed and Efficiency
of a Micro-Processor in a PC, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE
ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 9, Issue. 1, Nov-2013, www.iret.co.in.
G.Paranjothi and R.Manikandan, Photovoltaic Based Brushless DC Motor Closed Loop Drive for Electric Vehicle,
C. N. Bhende, S. Mishra, S. G. Malla, Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Based Standalone Wind Energy
Supply System, IEEE Transaction on sustainable energy, Vol. 2, No.2, 2011.
S.G. Malla, C. N. Bhende, S. Mishra, Photovoltaic based Water Pumping System, International Conference on
Energy, Automation and Signal (ICEAS), 2011.
G.Paranjothi and R.Manikandan, Photovoltaic Based Brushless DC Motor Closed Loop Drive for Electric Vehicle,
pp. 9-15, Jan-2014, www.iret.co.in.
Mr. Sundar Ganesh C.S and Mr. Joseph Mathew K, Intelligent Speed Control System for Automobiles, International
Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTEC-ISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 2, pp. 1-4, Sep.
2013, www.iret.co.in.
Phase Noise repression in Fractional-N PLLs using Glitch-Free Phase Switching Multi-Modulus Frequency Divider
Billa. Shirisha and Prof. A. balaji Nehru, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication
(IJNTEC-ISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 2, pp. 42-53, Sep. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
K. Naresh, Vaddi Ramesh, CH. Punya Sekhar and P Anjappa, Simulations for Three Phase to Two Phase
Transformation, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569)
Vol. 10, Issue. 1, pp. 16-20, Jan-2014, www.iret.co.in.
G.U.V.Ravi Kumar and Mr.Ch.V.N.Raja, Comparison between FSC and PID Controller for 5DOF Robot Arm,
pp. 1-6, Mar-2014, www.iret.co.in.
Dr.T.Govindaraj and S.Vishnu, Simulation Modelling of Sensor less Speed Control of BLDC Motor Using Artificial
Neural Network, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 23209569) Vol. 10, Issue. 2, pp. 7-15, Mar-2014, www.iret.co.in.
Dr. N. Prema kumar and B. Vanajakshi, Speed Control of PMSM Drive Using Conventional and Self Tuning Fuzzy
PI Controller, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569),
Vol. 10, Issue. 2, pp. 16-21, Mar-2014, www.iret.co.in.
P.P. Kiran Kumar Reddy and J. Nagarjuna Reddy, Photovoltaic Energy Conversion System for Water Pumping
Application, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569)
Vol. 10, Issue. 2, pp. 22-29, Mar-2014, www.iret.co.in.
129

[112] Optimal Reactive Power Flow in a Deregulated Power System A Case Study T. Hariharan and Dr. M. Gopala
Krishnan, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol.
10, Issue. 2, pp. 30-32, Mar-2014, www.iret.co.in.
[113] Design and Fabrication of Circularly Polarized Microstrip Patch Antenna using Symmetric Slit Suvidya R. Pawar1, R.
Sreemathy2, Shahadev D. Hake, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTEC
ISSN: 2347 - 7334) Vol. 2, Issue. 2, pp. 1-6, Mar. 2014, www.iret.co.in.
[114] Study of Multicast Routing Protocol in Wireless Mobile Adhoc Network Prof. Dr. Subhash P. Rasal, International
Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTECISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol. 2, Issue. 1, pp. 21-26,
Jan. 2014, www.iret.co.in.
[115] Y.A.Chapuis, D.Roye, J.Davoine, Principles and Implementation of Direct Torque Control by stator flux orientation
of Induction Motor, IEEE Trans. 1995.
[116] C. Lascu, I. Boldea, F. Blaabjerg, A Modified Direct Torque Control for Induction Motor Sensor less Drive. IEEE
Tram on Ind. Appl., vol 36, No-1, 122-130, January/ February 2000.
[117] Interweave Cognitive Radio Network: Signal Detection Pravin P.Magar, Megha N Pandey and Prof.Suman P.Wadkar,
International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTECISSN: 2347 - 7334) Vol. 2, Issue.
1, pp. 1-4, Jan. 2014, www.iret.co.in.
[118] Boosting Input Voltage and Improving PF Using PFC Circuit Prof.D.B.Madihalli, Prof.V.M.Chougala and
Prof.D.M.Kumbhar, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTECISSN: 2347 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 4, pp. 1-4, Nov. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
[119] Design & Simulation of Zigbee Transceiver System Based on MSK and QPSK Using Matlab Kapil Dev Jha and
Mohit Kumar Srivastava, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTECISSN:
2347 - 7334), Vol.4, Issue. 1, pp. 5-9, Nov. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
[120] S.Vamsidhar, B.G.Fernades, Design and Development of Energy Efficient Sensor less Direct Torque Controlled
Induction Motor Drive in Real Time Simulation, The 30th Annual conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
November 2-6, 2004.
[121] Energy Management by means of SMD Model Analysis for AMB Systems with Eccentricity Rupert Gouws,
International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTEC-ISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 3,
pp. 14-19, Oct. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
[122] An Approach to Look-Up-Table Design and Memory Based Realization of Fir Digital Filter with Decomposed
Distributed Arithmetic S. Srikanth and P. Sireesha, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and
Communication (IJNTEC-ISSN: 2347 - 7334), Vol.1, Issue. 2, pp. 54-63, Sep. 2013, www.iret.co.in.
[123] S.Vamsidhar, B.G.Fernades, Hardware-in-loop-simulation based design and experimental evaluation of DTC
strategies, 35th Annual IEEE power Electronics Special Conference, 2004.
[124] Management And Control of Power of an Integrated Active Wind Generator for Grid Integration and Generation of
Distributed Power, V. Anitha and Mr. N. Narasimhulu, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and
Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 10, Issue. 1, pp. 1-8, Jan-2014, www.iret.co.in.
[125] J. M. R. Malla and S. G. Malla, Three level diode clamped inverter for DTC-SVM of induction Motor, International
Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), 2010.
[126] Siva Ganesh Malla and Jagan Mohana Rao Malla, Direct Torque Control of Induction Motor with Fuzzy Controller:
A Review, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569),
Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 1-16, April-2014, www.iret.co.in.
[127] Aiswarya B, Dr. A. A Powly Thomas and Dr.Indumathi.G, Design of A Fault Tolerant Embedded Control System,
pp. 17-22, April-2014.
[128] Akhilesh P. Patil, Rambabu A. Vatti and Anuja S. Morankar, Simulation of Wind Solar Hybrid Systems Using
PSIM, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 10,
Issue. 3, pp. 23-28, April-2014.
[129] Darshan D. Patel and Rohit B.Patel, Chromatic Dispersion Compensation for 1610 Gbps WDM Optical
Communication System with Non Linearity, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 29-32, April-2014.
[130] A. Rajesh, K.S.V. Phani Kumar and Dr.K.Sumanth P, Enhancement of Power Quality Using Multiconverter Unified
Power-Quality Conditioning System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE
ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 33-38, April-2014.
[131] Nitesh Meena and B.B. Sharma, Backstepping Algorithm with Sliding Mode Control for Magnetic Levitation
System, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569) Vol.
10, Issue. 3, pp. 39-43, April-2014.
130

[132] M. Jayalakshmi, G. Asha and K. Keerthana, Control of Single Phase Z-Source Inverter Fed Induction Motor Using
Simple Boost Controller, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN:
2320-9569), Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 44-48, April-2014.
[133] Dr. T. Govindaraj and Mr. K. Bharanidharan, Stability and Reliability Improvement in Solar Wind Hybrid Power
System with Battery Energy Storage Station, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics
(IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 49-57, April-2014.
[134] Dr. T. Govindaraj and S. Vasanth, A Novel Approach to Harmonics Analysis and Control for Dynamic Power
System using STATCOM, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN:
2320-9569) Vol. 10, Issue. 3, pp. 58-66, April-2014.
[135] V.Rajeshwari and A.Anendhar, Design of Low Power, High Speed Parallel Archietecture for Cyclic Convolution
Based on FNT, International Journal of New Trends in Electronics and Communication (IJNTECISSN: 2347 7334) Vol. 2, Issue. 2, pp. 13-18, Mar. 2014.
131

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Vector Control of Induction Motor PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Vector Control of Induction Motor PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

B. S. Nayak.

/ International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Vector

Index Terms-Induction Motor, Vector Control, Speed Control, AC Motors.

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

The DC motor analogy

Where torque (T) Ia.If

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

3. TYPES OF VECTOR CONTROL TECHNIQUES OF INDUCTION MOTOR

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Direct vector control method

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Fixing of number of sensors is a tedious job.

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

In-direct vector control Method

figure-3:basic block diagram of indirect vector control mode

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

period ( T ).These signals of flux ( ids

and torque ( iqs ) are in the synchronously rotating reference

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

4. FIELD WEAKENING CONTROLLER

r < base speed

r >= base speed

Where Kf is flux constant.

is the excitation current,

is the magnetizing current,

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

r is the feedback speed of the motor,

is the base speed of the motor.

Estimation of ids , iqs and 2

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

r is the rotor time constant defined

and iqs n refer to flux and torque components of stator current at n th

And r r 1 where M= Lm , Lm is the magnetizing inductance

Two phase rotating frame to three phase stationary frame converter

Synchronous speed is obtained by addition of slip speed ( 2 ) and motor speed ( r )

ias iqs sin ids cos .........Eq(6)

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

ics ias ibs

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

PWM current controller

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

m and the instantaneous angular velocity of the

and rotor magnetizing current imr are given by

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

2 .the commanded slip frequency is integrated to give a

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering

Comparison with direct vector control

The sensors are eliminated.

Available online @ www.ijntse.com

B. S. Nayak. / International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering