Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
72
The rules
of visual
engagement
ATOM
73
Images in context
ATOM
74
Challenging classrooms
Dan is an early-career teacher working in a large, inner-urban
primary school, in which 98 per cent of students come from
language backgrounds other than English, and which serves
many underprivileged families. In this community there are
high levels of unemployment, subsidised housing and, very
often, limited resources at home. Historically, many students
living in poverty develop a resistance to schooling, where they
dont experience education as a positive part of their lives.15
During one lesson in Dans class, the pages of the controversial picture book Woolvs in the Sitee by Margaret Wild and Anne
Spudvilas16 were projected onto a large screen for the students
to read. In the book, Ben, alone with no family in a disturbing
post-apocalyptic world, is hiding from the woolvs, not daring
to go outside. His neighbour, Missus Radinski, doesnt believe
in the woolvs and encourages Ben to go out until one day she
disappears. The written text of the book is purposely misspelt, using invented phonetic spelling, and the charcoal and
coloured-ink visual images are dramatic and disturbing. The
children in this middle-years class were listening to the written text (which read aloud makes sense), but the focus of the
lesson was drawing out the possible meanings of the visual.
While looking at the scene of a dark and foreboding back alley,
Dan asked what visual features create a dangerous feel. Shawn
ATOM
Boy and Flame - Image from Margaret Wild & Anne Spudvilas, Woolvs in the
Sitee, Penguin, Camberwell, 2006. Courtesy of Penguin Group (Australia).
75
pointed to the barbed wire and noted that being in the foreground, it is drawn to make it look big. Thats brilliant, said
Dan, immediately praising the student and building on the idea
of visual perspective.
Dans questions were clearly focused on the pictures, encouraging his Year 6 students to find multiple meanings. He urged
them to put their Year 6 hats on, reminding them that to a
younger child a picture might only seem like a bike or door, but
to older students like them, it can hold much more. Stopping at
a page that shows the main character and a fire, Dan asked why
there might be fire in the picture. He then went deeper, asking
them What does fire symbolise? As the lesson unfolded, it
was clear that Dan was teaching quite specific visual features
of the text, using terms like symbolism, perspective, colour,
tone and angles. When studying stories like these, students in
Dans class will also create their own texts, blending words and
images in order to extend their English and literacy skills.
Dans classroom features a combination of intellectual rigour,
hands-on activities and a very positive learning environment.
His students are highly engaged in their learning, which is clear
in their facial expressions, speech and body language. The
class use a variety of visual resources and technology, where
students problem-solve, discuss, take digital photographs and
share their ideas. The hum of activity that often characterises
a positive learning environment is clearly evident, with all the
students actively and happily involved. So what makes the difference? Is engagement just a fleeting moment, or the skill of a
very talented teacher?
The Fair Go team came together over ten years ago, concerned
with the issue of student engagement for children and schools
in areas of high poverty. Based at the University of Western
Sydney, the team of academics have co-researched with classroom teachers to develop a theoretical framework that offers
both a description of student engagement and a pedagogical
guide for teachers who want to enhance learning and engagement in their classrooms. Their initial publication, School is
for Me,17 details a number of school case studies from Southwestern Sydney. Teachers for a Fair Go is their most recent
research project, in which twenty-eight exemplary teachers
from across NSW, working with K12 students, have been coresearching with their academic partners to detail the qualities
and pedagogical practice that make a difference in engaging
students living in poverty. The following section defines engagement as part of a broader theoretical framework and pedagogy,
and then considers the role of visual texts as contributing to
student engagement in a variety of classroom contexts.
ATOM
76
actively engaged in what they are doing, not just churning out
work for the teacher. She also believes engagement means
kids wanting to come to school, seeing school as a place for
them. This is the practical application of the Fair Go Projects
theoretical frame. The project defines student engagement at
two levels, termed small e and big E engagement. Small e
engagement happens in the everyday learning experiences.
Substantive engagement at this level is the combination of high
cognitive challenge, high affective feelings and high operative
involvement18 in other words, thinking hard, feeling good and
working well. The type of learning experience described in
Dans classroom lesson above illustrates this.
At the big E engagement level, the framework draws on sociological and pedagogical research. Educational sociologist Basil
Bernstein argues that classrooms often deliver strong messages to students through assessment, pedagogy and curriculum.19 The Fair Go Project posits that these messages strongly
shape students attitudes and engagement with schooling, in
both positive and negative ways. Unfortunately, many students
in low socioeconomic status schools have received negative
messages about learning and their own abilities and situations,
leading to the rejection of schooling and education as a positive
or enabling experience.20
ATOM
Rebecca, English teacher from western
New South Wales
But while caring and support are definitely necessary, they are
not sufficient to address the broader challenges of schooling
for students in poverty. Its here that the discourse that surrounds students schooling experience needs to be positive,
resilient and supported by effective pedagogy.
The social and personal implications of this rejection are powerful, detailed in both academic research and media reports.21
Schools in the Fair Go Project are those serving the poorest 18
per cent of communities in NSW. Teachers work with students whose oppositional behaviour often creates challenging
classroom contexts. These types of students and schools are
represented in several popular films, from the classic To Sir with
Love (James Clavell, 1967), to the more recent Good Will Hunting
(Gus Van Sant, 1997), Freedom Writers (Richard LaGravanese,
2007) and The Class (Laurent Cantet, 2008). Students in films
like these are often disconnected from knowledge and learning, having lost a sense of their own ability and a voice in the
school culture. The classroom is a place of power struggles
and control, although in some schools student disconnection
is evidenced by passive but uninterested compliance, where
teachers need to convince students that learning is active,
enjoyable and collaborative. While film representations can be
stereotypical, a lot of research from Willis seminal work in
the 1970s to more recent work by Connell in 1993 and Hayes
in 2006 demonstrates consistent evidence of disengagement
and lower academic outcomes for students living in poverty.22
Other challenges for teachers in the Fair Go research included
students with academic and language learning needs, those
from impoverished inner-urban communities and suburban
housing estates, and students living in remote contexts. At a
pastoral level, one of the key aspects of teachers working with
students is the importance of building emotionally safe learning
environments.
77
Visual engagement
ATOM
78
Endnotes
ATOM
79