Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

Q1 The Problem 15 pts

A 15-13 pts
Description of the problem
reflects a solid understanding of
the differences between the
current and desired
environments and what is
preventing the current
environment from becoming the
desired environment.
Justification is logical and based
on the provided background
material.

B 12-10 pts
The answer describes the
difference between the
current and desired
environments. It may, in
general terms identify
obstacles to achieving the
desired end state
conditions but lacks focus
or specifics.

C 9-7 pts
Identifies a problem,
however, the description is
not concise or it is not
clearly scoped to the
appropriate level or reflect
the environments. There is
weak justification for the
difference between the
current and desired
environments.

U < 7 pts
Statement is
neither concise nor
appropriately
scoped. It fails to
describe the
difference between
the current and
desired
environments.

Q2 CoG 20 pts
A 20-19 pts
Demonstrates strong
understanding of the linkage of the
adversarys objective, the CCs
required to achieve that
objective/end state and identifies
the entity that possesses those CCs
as the COG and its critical
requirements. Provides specific
examples from background
material or TORCH documents to
support the selection.

B 18-17 pts
C 16-15 pts
Identifies a doctrinally correct Identifies a doctrinally
approach to CoG
correct CoG but with
identification supported by
unsupported rationale.
background material or
Linkage between the
TORCH documentation.
objective/end state, CC,
Linkage between objective or CoG, CR and CV are
end state, CC, CoG, CR and weak
CV can be made and is
satisfactory. Provides clear
and organized answer that is
logically justified and
supported by background
or TORCH
Q3amaterial
Operational
Approach Narrative 12.5 pts
documents
A 12.5 -11 pts
B 10-9 pts
C 8-7 pts
The narrative reflects a solid
Clearly describes a
Describes only in general
understanding of the operational
broad approach to
terms a broad approach to
environment and the problem while achieve the desired
achieve the desired end state
describing a broad approach for
end state. Logically
but is only loosely linked to
achieving the desired end state. The supported by the
current environment. Weakly
narrative is a logical conclusion of
problem statement
supported by the problem
previous responses and clearly
and is scoped at the
statement. May not properly
articulates how the Allies will
appropriate level
be scoped at the appropriate
transition the current environment
M/NATO.
level.
to the desired environment.

U < 15
Fails to identify an Axis
Cog

U < 7 pts
Describes in general
terms a broad approach
to achieve the desired
end state but is only
loosely linked to current
environment. Not
supported by the
problem statement. Not
properly be scoped at the
appropriate level.

Q3b Operational Approach Graphic 12.5 pts


A 12.5 -11pts
The graphic is explained
by the narrative.
Planners could clearly

B 10-9 pts
The graphic is generally
explained by the
narrative. Planners can

C 8-7 pts
The graphic is only loosely
linked to the narrative.
Planners could derive initial

U < 7 pts
The graphic is not linked to
the narrative. Planners
cannot derive any intent

derive initial intent and


begin mission analysis
based upon this product.

derive initial intent but


would need more
information to begin
mission analysis.

intent but would need much


more information to begin
mission analysis.

and would need significant


explanation to begin
mission analysis.

Q4 Conditions/Military End State 5 pts


A 5 pts
Selects correct answer

N/A

U
Fails to select the correct answer.

N/A

Q5 CoG 20 pts
A 20-19 pts
Demonstrates strong
understanding of the linkage of
the objective, the CC required to
achieve that objective and
identifies the entity that
possesses that CC as the COG
and its critical requirements.
Provides specific examples from
background material or TORCH
documents to support the
selection.

B 18-17 pts
General understanding. Identifies a
doctrinally correct approach to CoG
identification supported by TORCH
documentation. Linkage between
objective, CC, CoG, CR and CV is
satisfactory. Provides clear and
organized answer that is logically
justified and supported by
background or TORCH documents

C 16-15 pts
Identifies a
doctrinally correct
CoG with
unsupported
rationale. Linkage
between the
objective, CC, CoG,
CR and CV are
weak

U < 15 pts
Fails to identify
an Allied CoG

Q6 Direct or Indirect Approach 5 pts


A 5 pts
Selects correct answer or an answer that
correctly relates to the CoG the student had
selected in Q2.

B
N/A

C
N/A

U < 5 pts
Fails to select the correct answer.

Q7 Decisive Points (DP) 5 pts


A 5 pts
Clearly understands the
concept. Identifies and supports
with well-developed discussion
three joint-force oriented DPs.
Links DP to critical factors.
Comprehensively explains the
advantage provided to the
Allied operation.

B 4 pts
Generally understands the
concept. Identifies three
doctrinally correct DPs
supported by TORCH
documentation. Generally
explains the advantage
provided to the Allied
operation but with some
inconsistency.

C 3 pts
Identifies only two doctrinally
correct decisive points with or
without supporting rationale.
Does not explain the advantage
provided to the Allied operation
or confuses DPs with critical
factors or CoGs.

U < 3 pts
Identifies
neither
Allied nor
Axis
decisive
points.

Q8 Culmination 5 pts
A 5 pts
Clearly understands the

B 4 pts
Generally understands the

C 3 pts
Identifies one or two

U < 3 pts
Identifies neither

concept. Identifies and


supports three joint-forceoriented culminating
points. Provides clear and
organized critique of the
plans effectiveness in
addressing culmination.

concept. Identifies three


doctrinally correct culmination
points supported by TORCH
documentation. Generally
critiques the plans effectiveness
in addressing culmination, but
with some inconsistency.

doctrinally correct
culminating points with
unsupported rationale.
Confuses the concept of
culmination with defeat,
or identifies culminating
points outside the
theater.

Allied nor Axis


culminating points.
Fails to
demonstrate an
understanding of
the concept of
culmination.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen