Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Foreword
This paper is presented to The Institution of Naval Architects with the gracious
permission of Her Majesty The Queen.
On April 16, 1953, her Majesty The Queen launched the new Royal Yacht Britannia
at the Clydebank Shipyard of Messrs. John Brown & Co. (Clydebank) Ltd. In reply to
the late Lord Aberconways address to her Majesty after the launching ceremony, The
Queen said:
"It has been a great pleasure to come to Clydebank today and once again to launch a
ship in John Browns yard. This time it means more to me than ever before, because
the Britannia, which is now floating in the waters of the Clyde, is not only the most
modern addition to a long line of Royal Yachts which goes back to the reign of King
Charles the Second, but she is to be at times the home of my husband and myself and
of our family.
I am sure that all of you who are present here realise how much the building of this
ship meant to the late King, my father. He felt most strongly, as I do, that a yacht was
a necessity and not a luxury for the Head of our great British Commonwealth,
between whose countries the seas is no barrier but the natural and indestructible
highway. With the wise advice of the Admiralty and of your firm, he laid the plans of
a vessel which should wear the Royal Standard in days of peace and which, in the
event of a war should serve the cause of humanity as a hospital ship."
From Her Majestys words it will be appreciated that proposals for a Royal Yacht to
replace the Victoria and Albert started during the reign of the late King George VI,
who took a great personal interest in the development of the design. The project was
undertaken as a matter of urgency, since it was the hope of those concerned that a
yacht in which His Majesty could undertake sea voyages would greatly improve the
changes of his recovery to good health. On this premise the urgency the design of
Britannia was developed.
Design
In 1938, the Admiralty considered the possibility of building a ship which would not
only replace the Royal Yacht Victoria and Albert, then nearly 40 years old, but which
could be economically converted to a hospital ship in the event of a war. Outline
drawings and a statement of essential requirements were accordingly prepared, and in
1939 these were sent to some of the principal shipbuilders in the country, inviting
them to submit more detailed proposals. With the advent of war, however, the matter
was dropped.
In 1951 the project was revived, and in October of that year the Admiralty announced
that a medium-sized hospital ship would be put into the re-armament programme and
would be used in peacetime to replace H.M. Yacht Victoria and Albert, which by then
was not seaworthy. Sketch designs were started in the Admiralty on the basis of the
1939 design reduced in size.
Although the title of this paper is "Her Majestys Yacht Britannia," most of the subject
matter refers equally to the hospital ship role.
It was decided that the ship should be suitable for service in both tropical and arctic
waters. A continuous seagoing speed of 21 knots was required, and this meant that a
trial speed of 22 knots with the ship in the load condition, with clean bottom and in
temperate waters, had to be guaranteed. The endurance required was at least 2,000
miles at 20 knots at load displacement with clean bottom and in temperate waters,
allowance being made for the maximum load required for auxiliary machinery and for
domestic services.
The necessity for economy in the cost of construction was kept continually in mind
during the design and construction of the ship. The late King and subsequently Her
Majesty The Queen both stressed this need for economy and made many suggestions
with the object of reducing expenditure. Even after the design has been commenced
the original requirements were reviewed and many changes were made in order to
reduce the size of the ship. It was necessary, however, to ensure that the size of the
ship was not so reduced as to impair her seaworthiness when undertaking long ocean
passages. Moreover the ship had to be large enough to permit of economical
employment as a hospital ship in wartime. After much consideration it was decided
that the smallest ship to meet these requirements was one of about 4,000 tons
displacement, and every effort was made to produce an acceptable design with a
displacement as near to this figure as practicable.
It will be appreciated that the design of a dual-purpose ship such as this, is far from
being straightforward. Designs had to be developed simultaneously for the Royal
Yacht and hospital ship roles and the best arrangement worked out which would meet
both requirements and at the same time ensure that the work and cost of conversion in
wartime would be kept to a minimum. For example, certain features have been
embodied in the design which add to the value of the ship as a Royal Yacht, but which
are not altogether essential for that purpose. They would however be necessary if and
when the ship is used as a hospital ship. Such features include ships stabilizers,
certain air-conditioning, large laundry facilities and comparatively high speed, none
139ft. 3 in.
118ft. 10 in.
Rake
1 5/8 in. per ft.
1 in. per ft.
1 7/8 in. per ft.
In the load condition the ship carries 330 tons of oil fuel which is more than sufficient
to obtain the design endurance of 2,000 miles at 20 knots, and 120 tons of fresh water
which is considered sufficient for two days supply without evaporators working.
Extra tank capacity is available for use on long ocean passages, and by its use the oil
fuel capacity can be increased to 490 tons and the fresh water to 195 tons. These
additional tanks will normally remain empty.
Hull Form
The first experiments to determine the resistance of the hull were carried out by
Messrs. John Brown, who ran a model in their tank at Clydebank at a displacement
corresponding to 4,470 tons, level trim, over a speed range from 14 to 22 knots.
Afterwards A.E.W. Haslar ran a model to slightly different displacement and draught
and compared the results with those of other good hulls of about the same proportions
and speed, including methodical series results. They confirmed that the hull lines were
of a very good standard throughout the speed range. Messrs. John Brown then
proposed a semi-bulbous bow as showing an improvement in performance above 18
knots although performance was slightly prejudiced below that speed.
The form was modified to include a semi-bulbous bow; the lines were slightly fined
forward and filled out aft, and all cut-up forward was deleted. The final model was
run by Messrs. John brown with satisfactory results.
Propellers
One of the essential requirements was that the ship should be as free from vibration as
possible. Before deciding on the propeller design therefore, calculations were made at
A.E.W. Haslar of the natural frequency of vertical flexural vibration of the hull for
guidance in determining the number of blades to avoid propeller excitation. The
method of basic functions was followed and allowance was made for the influence of
entrained water, shear deflection and rotary inertia. Some notes on this method and
the assumptions involved are given in Appenidix I. Calculations covered the first nine
nodes and the predicted frequencies ranged from 116 cycles per minute for two node
vibration to 708 cycles per minute for nine nodes. Higher nodes were not investigated
as it was considered that such vibration would be of very small amplitude and not
sufficiently stable to be excited by the propellers to any sensible extent.
It may be mentioned that the method followed is comparatively new. It is intricate and
fairly lengthy but it is regarded as such a promising advance on previous approaches
as to justify the work involved. Naturally, until experience is available as to the
validity of the assumptions, including hull stiffness, the calculations can only be
regarded as approximate, particularly having regard to the close precision necessary
for resonance predictions. However, we were fortified in that a similar approach for a
ship of comparable size indicated that the method was trustworthy to cover the range
of interest for Britannia.
Allowing a margin on the estimates, it was deduced that three-bladed propellers might
stimulate resonance due to shaft excitation superposed on blade excitation over a
speed range of 16 to 19 knots. Resonance due to shaft excitation with four-bladed
propellers might be excited from 16 to 18 knots and with blade excitation from 14 to
15 knots. Experience on comparable ships suggested that transverse hull vibration
might also be excited over the speed range quoted above for three-bladed propellers
but only at lower speeds for four-bladed propellers. Resonant vibration might also be
excited at lower speeds than mentioned, but experience confirmed that this would be
slight and unobjectionable. This vibration might be expected at lower speeds with
four-bladed propellers than with three-bladed propellers. On the whole the risk of
objectionable vibration was regarded as slight with four-bladed propellers, whereas
objectionable vibration might be induced with three-bladed propellers due to a
combination of nodes and frequencies.
It was therefore decided to fit four-bladed propellers rather than three-bladed. A loss
of speed of the order of one-eight knot was estimated, but this was regarded as
acceptable in view of the importance of suppressing vibration. Furthermore, the
shipbuilders were confident that the contract condition of a guaranteed trial speed of
22 knots would be met.
Advance calculations indicated that the critical speeds of axial shaft vibration both for
three-bladed and four-bladed propellers were greater than the maximum shaft
revolutions per minute. The margin for four-bladed propellers was rather small but
this was regarded as less serious than the risk of general hull vibration if three-bladed
propellers were fitted. A.E.W. Haslar worked out proposed particulars for a four-
bladed propeller and Messrs. John Brown prepared the detailed propeller design with
the following characteristics:
Diameter 10.25ft.
Pitch 9 ft.
Developed blade area 55.7 sq. ft.
With this diameter propeller a good tip clearance of 2 ft. 9 in. from the hull was
obtained.
A model propeller of 12 in. diameter, made in manganese bronze to the usual close
tolerances, was tested in the tunnel at A.E.W. Haslar over a range of cavitation
number from 6.55 to 1.7 corresponding to a range of nominal ship speed from 13.4 to
26.3 knots. The results are shown in the usual coefficient form in Fig. 3. Photographs
of cavitation are shown in Fig. 4. The propulsion curves present the usual
characteristics and call for no particular comment except that the propulsive
efficiency is favourable for the conditions of revolutions, speed and wake. Cavitation
was light and restricted to a small zone of sheet cavitation on the back of each blade
towards the tip, and slight face cavitation near the leading edge in the region of 0.5 to
0.8 radius. The latter was avoided by slight washback and this modification was
arranged on the spare set of propellers for the ship.
Further remarks on propellers are given under the section on sea trials
Rudder
Very careful consideration was given to the turning qualities of the design and the
good results obtained will be appreciated from the section dealing with sea trials.
Torque and normal force on the rudder were, however, determined from
measurements on a propelled model hull when on a straight course with rudder
adjusted in turn to various angles. Results are shown in Figs. 5 and 6.
Maximum rudder torque was estimated to be 125 tons ft. at 14 knots astern and 30
deg. angle. The torque was reduced to 116 tons ft. at 35 deg. angle, but was larger at
greater angles outside the operating range. When proceeding at 22 knots ahead the
torque was 69 tons ft. and at 15 knots was 33 tons ft., both at full rudder angle of 35
deg.
Maximum normal rudder force was estimated to be 63.5 tons at 22 knots ahead, and
25.5 tons at 14 knots astern.
The centre of pressure was abaft the rudder axis at all forward speeds and for all
rudder angles tested. It was not possible however to bring the centre of pressure
further forward without unacceptable modification to the stern form.
The results indicated a comparatively small discontinuity in the progressive increase
of torque and force with angle in ahead motion at about 30 to 35 deg. and a definite
stalling at 30 deg. in astern motion. Geometrically the rudder enters the propeller
race at about 30 deg. and the discontinuity may be due to the influence of the
propeller race associated in astern motion with the usual stalling phenomena which
depend, amount other factors, on aspect ratio.
Generally the results were reasonably consistent with those obtained from tests on
other models. The normal force coefficient at 22 knots ahead and 35 deg. angle was
0.026 which compares with a general average value of 0.03 for ships generally,
subject to a margin of 10 per cent or so up and down. (Normal force coefficient is
P/AV2O, where P = force in lb., A = rudder area in sq. ft., V = speed of ship in ft./sec.,
O is the rudder angle in degrees.) The torque was consistent with estimates by the
strip method.
Seaworthiness
Comprehensive experiments were carried out at A.E.W. Haslar to investigate the sea
keeping qualities of the ship. A dynamic model to a scale of 1/32nd full size was tested
head-on to uniform waves when towed at speeds corresponding to 10, 15, and 20 knots
and in following waves at speeds corresponding to 10 and 20 knots. Tests were also made
with the model hove-to head on to the waves. The wave lengths ranged from 200 to 700
ft. at full scale with heights 1/20th and 1/40th the length.
The motion in ahead seas was heavy in long waves, but was reduced in short waves,
the motion being small when the length of the wave was less than about three-quarters
the length of the ship. Generally, peak oscillations occurred in waves about 30 per
cent or so longer than the ship and were more severe at high speed. As an indication
of the severity of the extreme motions it may be mentioned that the maximum
amplitude of pitch was about 20 deg. (out to out) and of heave 32 ft. (out to out) when
the ship was proceeding at 20 knots in waves about 500 ft. long. Whilst it would be
unseamanlike, even if practicable, to proceed at this high speed in such heavy seas, it
is of interest that the motion is still severe when the ship is hove to.
A considerable increase in hull resistance occurs in waves, which shows the variation
in ehp with wave length for various wave heights at a speed of 10 knots. A point of
interest is that over the speed range up to 20 knots it was found that the peak of hull
resistance occurs in waves which are shorter than those causing peak motions. The
maximum speed that can be sustained at sea with full machinery power was deduced
from the results to be about 20 knots in waves 4 ft. high reducing to about 10 knots in
waves 20 ft. high.
The experiments verified that the design had good sea-keeping qualities except that in
waves 400 ft. long and 20 ft. high, green seas were taken over the bow at all speeds.
The water flowed rapidly aft when the model pitched with stern down, crashed against
the front of the bridge and was deflected overboard through the freeing doors in the
bulwarks at the after end of the forecastle. Heavy spray was thrown over the bridge.
The height of the bulwark at the bow was increased from 4 ft. to 6 ft., a modification
which caused conditions to improve considerably. In fact, with the ship trimmed 2 ft.
by the stern no water at all was taken over the bow in any condition of speed of model
and size of wave investigated. In this connection it may be noted that the freeboard
coefficient at the bow is 8.1 per cent, which will be recognized as exceeding that of
may classes of ships.
Construction
All the structural plans for Britannia were submitted to Lloyds Register of Shipping
as is the practice for classed merchant ships, and in the final form these plans were
approved by both Lloyds Register and the Admiralty. The vessel has been surveyed
during construction by the Surveyors to the Society in conjunction with Admiralty
Overseers, and has been assigned the Classification *100A1 with freeboard
corresponding to a summer moulded draught of 16 ft. 6 in.
To provide a check on design calculations, all items put into the ship have been
weighed and an account kept of the totals.
The profile and general arrangement plans are shown in Figs. 11 and 12.
The upper, main and lower decks are worked continuously over the entire length of
the vessel except in way of boiler-room uptakes. The platform deck is watertight
throughout, watertight hatch covers being fitted for access.
Main watertight transverse bulkheads are carried to the upper deck, although from a
sub-division point of view it would have been sufficient had they been terminated at
the main deck. There are no openings in these bulkheads below the lower deck. The
usual watertight door access between machinery spaces and shaft tunnels in merchant
ships is omitted, naval practice being followed in this respect. Electrically operated
horizontal sliding watertight doors are fitted to the watertight bulkheads on the lower
deck. They can be power operated locally or from the bridge, or hand operated locally
or from the main deck. Three of the main transverse bulkheads are fire-resisting.
The ship is transversely framed, the frame spacing being 2 ft. Deep web frames are
fitted at intervals in the machinery spaces and also at intervals aft from 153 bulkhead
to the stern. The structure is particularly strong in way of the shaft bossings, which
have been adopted at the request of the shipbuilders in preference to the Admiralty
practice of fitting shaft brackets. In the State rooms on the upper deck aft, deep web
frames and beams have been used to obviate the need for pillars.
The shell plating above the light waterline is worked flush. Below the waterline the
plating is lapped but the plate edges forward have been faired with composition. Butts
of shell plating below the waterline and the shell plating in way of reserve feed tanks
and fresh water tanks are welded. The internal boundaries of oil fuel tanks are also
welded.
Light alloys have been used to a limited extent. It was originally intended that all the
superstructures should be of aluminium alloy but it was later decided to use steel
because of the high cost of aluminium. Aluminium has, however, been retained for the
superstructure above the bridge deck and for the funnel.
All decks except the platform have a camber of 9 in. on the full moulded breadth. A
minimum tween deck height of 8 ft. has been adopted except in a few local places. In
many places the deck height is greater than 8 ft.; it is 10 ft. throughout the State
apartments. The after end of the sun deck has been stiffened so that it can be used, if
required, as a helicopter landing deck.
All weather decks are sheathed with 2 in. teak. The upper deck is protected all round
by bulwarks 3 ft. 6 in. deep amidships rising to 6 ft. high at the bow. Freeing port
area, in excess of the requirements of the Load Line Rules, is provided in the form of
bulwark doors, which are kept open at sea. These doors will normally be closed in
protected waters to preserve the unbroken appearance of the bulwarks. Steel screen
doors are provided for use in bad weather to protect the large wooden entrance doors
to the State apartments on the upper deck. Portable metal screens are similarly
provided for all the large glass windows aft on this deck.
To reduce possible heel if damaged, no longitudinal watertight bulkheads other than
normal tank boundaries have been fitted. To meet the requirement of the Merchant
Shipping (Construction) Rules 1952 that in the event of unsymmetrical flooding the
resulting heel is not to exceed 7 degrees, the shaft tunnels have been cross connected,
as also have been the large wing oil fuel tanks aft.
Bridges
All the structural plans for Britannia were submitted to Lloyds Register of Shipping
as is the practice for classed merchant ships, and in the final form these plans were
approved by both Lloyds Register and the Admiralty. The vessel has been surveyed
during construction by the Surveyors to the Society in conjunction with Admiralty
Overseers, and has been assigned the Classification *100A1 with freeboard
corresponding to a summer moulded draught of 16 ft. 6 in.
To provide a check on design calculations, all items put into the ship have been
weighed and an account kept of the totals.
The profile and general arrangement plans are shown in Figs. 11 and 12.
The upper, main and lower decks are worked continuously over the entire length of
the vessel except in way of boiler-room uptakes. The platform deck is watertight
throughout, watertight hatch covers being fitted for access.
Main watertight transverse bulkheads are carried to the upper deck, although from a
sub-division point of view it would have been sufficient had they been terminated at
the main deck. There are no openings in these bulkheads below the lower deck. The
usual watertight door access between machinery spaces and shaft tunnels in merchant
ships is omitted, naval practice being followed in this respect. Electrically operated
horizontal sliding watertight doors are fitted to the watertight bulkheads on the lower
deck. They can be power operated locally or from the bridge, or hand operated locally
or from the main deck. Three of the main transverse bulkheads are fire-resisting.
The ship is transversely framed, the frame spacing being 2 ft. Deep web frames are
fitted at intervals in the machinery spaces and also at intervals aft from 153 bulkhead
to the stern. The structure is particularly strong in way of the shaft bossings, which
have been adopted at the request of the shipbuilders in preference to the Admiralty
practice of fitting shaft brackets. In the State rooms on the upper deck aft, deep web
frames and beams have been used to obviate the need for pillars.
The shell plating above the light waterline is worked flush. Below the waterline the
plating is lapped but the plate edges forward have been faired with composition. Butts
of shell plating below the waterline and the shell plating in way of reserve feed tanks
and fresh water tanks are welded. The internal boundaries of oil fuel tanks are also
welded.
Light alloys have been used to a limited extent. It was originally intended that all the
superstructures should be of aluminium alloy but it was later decided to use steel
because of the high cost of aluminium. Aluminium has, however, been retained for the
superstructure above the bridge deck and for the funnel.
All decks except the platform have a camber of 9 in. on the full moulded breadth. A
minimum tween deck height of 8 ft. has been adopted except in a few local places. In
many places the deck height is greater than 8 ft.; it is 10 ft. throughout the State
apartments. The after end of the sun deck has been stiffened so that it can be used, if
required, as a helicopter landing deck.
All weather decks are sheathed with 2 in. teak. The upper deck is protected all round
by bulwarks 3 ft. 6 in. deep amidships rising to 6 ft. high at the bow. Freeing port
area, in excess of the requirements of the Load Line Rules, is provided in the form of
bulwark doors, which are kept open at sea. These doors will normally be closed in
protected waters to preserve the unbroken appearance of the bulwarks. Steel screen
doors are provided for use in bad weather to protect the large wooden entrance doors
to the State apartments on the upper deck. Portable metal screens are similarly
provided for all the large glass windows aft on this deck.
To reduce possible heel if damaged, no longitudinal watertight bulkheads other than
normal tank boundaries have been fitted. To meet the requirement of the Merchant
Shipping (Construction) Rules 1952 that in the event of unsymmetrical flooding the
resulting heel is not to exceed 7 degrees, the shaft tunnels have been cross connected,
as also have been the large wing oil fuel tanks aft.
Accomodation
Accommodation for the Royal party and staff is aft and for the ships company
forward.
The Royal apartments are on the shelter deck between the main and mizzen masts
with a veranda at the after end leading on to a sun deck. A point which may be noticed
from the profile is that the deck of these apartments is 2 ft. higher than the general
shelter deck level so that the external fore and aft gangways are well below the
windows of the Royal apartments.
The main staircase from the Royal apartments on the shelter deck leads to a vestibule
on the upper deck about which are grouped the State apartments. At either side of the
vestibule are Her Majestys and His Royal Highnesss sitting rooms. The diningroom, drawing-room and ante-room extend the full width of the super-structure
without obstruction from pillars. Sliding screens are fitted at the entrance to the anteroom and between the ante-room and the drawing-room. They can be folded back
when required to provide a large reception space from the after end of the drawingroom to the foot of the main staircase.
The main staircase continues down from the upper deck to the main deck, in the
vicinity of the main entrance ports. The Household and guest cabins, sitting-rooms
and cloak rooms are on this deck. These rooms are fitted out to first class passenger
liner standards.
The Royal staff is accommodated on the lower deck, the rooms being fitted out to
Service standards.
A passenger lift is fitted near the main staircase and operates between the main and
shelter decks.
The crew of 21 officers and 250 men is accommodated forward in a manner generally
in accordance with Service practice except than the C.P.O.s occupy 4-berth cabins.
The suitability of the decorative design and the furnishing of the Royal and State
apartments has, of course, been very important. Her Majesty and His Royal Highness
The Duke of Edinburgh have both taken a great interest in the work and have
personally approved the decorative treatment of the walls and ceilings and the design
of new furniture and have chosen the soft furnishings.
In the interests of economy, use has been made as far as possible of furniture from the
Victoria and Albert and of new pieces supplied for use in s.s.Gothic for the
Commonwealth tour.
Messrs. John Brown appointed Messrs. A. McInnes Gardner & Partners as their
decorative architects for this work. Because of its importance from the standpoint of
current British decorative art it was considered desirable to have the advice of a
second specialist in this field and Sir Hugh Casson was appointed as consultant to the
Admiralty. The result of this collaboration has been very successful.
Details of the decorative schemes and furnishings have not been included in this paper
as it has been decided that this information cannot be released until Her Majesty has
personally seen the Royal and State apartments.
Freshwater-Systems
Allowance has been made for a higher rate of consumption of fresh water for
domestic purposes than is usual in H.M. ships. Tank stowage for 195 tons of fresh
water is provided, and there are two evaporators with a total distilling capacity of 120
tons per 20-hour day. A 20-ton/day feed-water distilling plant is fitted in the engineroom to provide make-up feed-water.
Fresh water storage tanks are fitted at each end of the ship. Two separate fresh water
pressure supply systems are provided, one forward and one aft, and can be
interconnected if required. Two 10-ton/hour pumps supply the after system and one
10-ton pump the forward system. The water is chemically treated by the injection of
chlorine in to the filling main. The water is pumped from the storage tanks through
fine mesh filters to the pressure tanks and then to the fresh water main through carbon
dechlorinators. A small quantity of lime is added to the water in the storage tanks to
make it slightly alkaline and so protect the copper piping of the systems.
Separate hot fresh water systems are also fitted forward and aft with provision for
inter-connecting. Each system is heated by a 300-gallon steam calorifier with a
heating capacity of 3,000 gallons per hour.
A 1-hp circulating pump is fitted in each system.
Sewage System
Careful consideration was given during the design to the arrangements for disposal of
sewage and waste water. The problem was important because of the probability that
the ship, in either role, may be required to lie in restricted, perhaps non-tidal, harbours
for long periods with her full complement on board.
One possibility considered was the mechanical separation of liquids and solids, and
the treatment and stowage of the solids until a convenient opportunity for discharging
occurred. Another line investigated was the use of a comminator to break up solids
and produce a fine sludge which could be discharged overboard. Unfortunately, both
these ideas had to be abandoned in favour of the more conventional arrangements
already in use in merchant ships since, so far as is known, neither system had been
tried before in ships and shortage of time precluded satisfactory development.
Two entirely separate sewage and waste water systems are fitted, one forward and one
aft. This will enable the system aft to be completely shut down when it is not required.
Each system discharges to a sewage tank which is pumped out by either of two pumps
operated by float control. Two overboard discharges are provided, one each side the
ship for each system and either pump may discharge either side. The sewage tank may
be by-passed if necesary.
The size of the sewage tanks which could be fitted was limited by the space available.
In order to reduce the frequency of pumping out the tanks when necessary,
arrangements have been made for the disposal of waste water from baths, etc., directly
over board in harbour, if desired.
manufacturers to ensure that the fall slower easily under no load conditions without
the need for over-hauling. The device consists essentially of driving the wire
mechanically over the pulleys at each davit head. For appearance the davits can be
hoisted in-board when the boats are away and by this reeling device the falls can be
lowered quickly when boats have to be hosted. The 16-ft. and 14-ft. boats are stowed
on the shelter deck amidships and are lowered from the gravity davits, using
spreaders, after the other boats are away.
Stabilisers
Denny-Brown single fin stabilisers are fitted in a hold compartment immediately
forward of the main machinery spaces. The specification for the gear called for power
to stabilise a roll of 20 deg. out to out reducing it to 6 deg. out to out at ship speed of
17 knots. The fins, which are retractable, are 4 ft. 6 in. wide, with outreach from the
hull of 9 ft. 4 in. and area of 42sq. ft. each. They are capable of operating at the hull
ship speed of 22 knots at the maximum fin angle which is 20 deg.
The fins are run out, rotated and retracted by an electro-hydraulic system which is
capable of being controlled from the bridge. The main controlling motor is a 37 bhp
unit and the servo-motor a 10 bhp unit.
Laundry
The laundry has been designed to meet the requirements of the ship either as a Royal
Yacht or as a hospital ship. Separate facilities are provided within the laundry to meet
the requirements of the Royal party.
The output of the laundry working a 48-hour week is such that provision is made for
all requirements for the Royal Family, Guests and Household and for 20 lb. of work
per man per week from the ships company and Royal staff.
The laundry machinery is of the type normally installed in laundries of H.M. ships,
except that in this case, a more generous allowance of finishing equipment is provided
to meet the higher standard of appearance, which is necessary.
The steam consumption will be about 1100-lb./hr., the electrical load 18 kW and the
estimated water consumption 3 tons/day.
Cinema Arrangements
The dining-room will be used for showing films to the Royal party. Projection will be
from the servery through ports in the forward bulkhead of the dining-room to a screen
at the after end. The two 35-mm. projectors are being made so that they can be readily
broken down into easily handled parts and stowed out of the way. Only 35-mm. safety
base type film will be show. The projectors are capable of being adapted for 3D films.
Arrangements are made for 16-mm. films to be shown on the sun deck, in the Royal
staff mess and at various positions forward for the ships company.
Saluting Guns
It is a traditional practice to fire a morning and evening gun when Her Majesty is on
board her Yacht with her Standard flying, and for this purpose two 3-pdr, saluting
guns are carried on the compass platform.
The main machinery in Britannia consists of two sets of turbines and gearing, each set
comprising one H.P. turbine and one L.P. turbine in which is incorporated the astern
turbine, all constructed by Messrs. John Brown & Co. (Clydebank) Ltd. Single
reduction hobbed and shaved gearing is fitted, driving the shafts at 285rpm when the
maximum power of 6,000 shp per shaft is being developed. Full power revolutions of
the H.P. and L.P. turbines are 4,910 and 3,550 rpm respectively. The condensers,
which are of the two-flow type, are under-slung beneath the L.P. turbines and are
supplied with circulating water by electrically driven pumps with a maximum
capacity of 10,000 gall./min. for each condenser. A conventional close-feed system is
fitted using an auxiliary condenser in the boiler-room for harbour steaming
conditions.
Steam is generated from two main boilers, each having a capacity of 75,000-lb./hr. at
a pressure of 300-lb./in.2 and a temperature at the superheater outlet of 660 deg. F.
The boiler combustion air is trunked to the boilers and is drawn by electrically driven
forced draught fans from a plenum space at the base of the funnel into which the
exhaust ventilation from the boiler-room is discharged. Thus, warm ventilation
exhaust from the boiler-room is fed to the boilers augmented by fresh air from the
atmosphere drawn through slats in the plenum space.
The exhaust gases from the boilers are extracted by electrically driven induced
draught fans and discharged through grit arresters to the atmosphere. At full power the
gases leave the funnel with a velocity of about 110-ft./sec. and a temperature of 400
deg. F.
It is essential for the efficient operation of the grit arresters and to keep the funnel
discharge well clear of the ship, that a high efflux velocity of the exhaust gases be
maintained under varying power conditions. This is obtained by hydraulic control
from the boiler-room platform of the inlet flaps to the grit arresters, which allows the
number of arresters in use to be adjusted to suit the power.
An auxiliary boiler is installed to meet harbour requirements. It has an evaporating
capacity of 20,000 lb./hr. at the same steam conditions as the main boilers, and can be
used to augment the main steam supply.
The main and auxiliary boiler feed pumps and the main engine auxiliaries are
electrically driven. Two salt water evaporating and distilling plants, each having an
output of 60 tons per day, are fitted in the generator room and a 20 ton per day feed
water evaporator is sited in the engine-room for make-up feed purposes.
The ventilation and general conditions in the machinery spaces during trials were
most satisfactory and well repaid the close attention given to these matters during the
design stage. The engine-room is ventilated by two axial flow and two centrifugal
supply fans with a total output of 30,000 cu. ft./min. and three axial flow exhaust fans
with a total exhaust of 32,000 cu. ft./min. The slight negative pressure in the engineroom should prevent warm air escaping into the ship through the engine-room
entrances should they be open.
The boiler-room is supplied by two axial flow fans of 10,000 cu. ft./min. each, whilst
the generator room has a fan supply and exhaust of 15,000 cu. ft./min.
Steering Gear
The steering gear is of the electro-hydraulic type with two separate motor-driven
variable delivery pumps either of which is capable of actuating the rudder under
maximum torque conditions. The pumps are telemotor controlled from the
wheelhouse and by mechanical control in the steering gear compartment. A separate
hand operated variable delivery pump is available for emergency operation of the
gear.
Funnel
The size and shape of the funnel were finally decided with the assistance of the
Aerodynamics Division N.P.L., who conducted wind tunnel tests of various funnel
designs for the Admiralty.
It was desired that the funnel should have a pleasing appearance, that the decks should
be free from smoke and funnel gases, and that the funnel paint-work should not be
discoloured by smoke and gases eddying in the vicinity of the funnel top.
As was to be expected, the most efficient funnel suggested by the wind tunnel tests
was unacceptable on account of height and shape of top. Whilst space does not permit
of a full discussion of the tests, it is of interest to compare the design of funnel first
tested (A) with that finally fitted (B).
With funnel A there was a breakdown in smooth air flow around the funnel and
considerable eddying around the top edge as soon as the wind direction became
slightly off the bow. The eddies of smoke extended down the side of the funnel to the
superstructure level. In funnel B the width is decreased by 4 ft. and a front of better
aerodynamic section substituted for the semi-circular front. Although there is still a
breakdown of smooth air flow round this funnel section it occurs with the wind much
further off the bow than with funnel A. The top of funnel B is cased in. This casing is
streamlined in the fore and aft direction with circular sections athwartships. With
these changes there was a great improvement in funnel performance. Further
improvement was obtained by grouping the uptakes instead of distributing them over
the funnel top. In funnel B the uptakes are actually 2 ft. higher than the funnel A
although the fore end of funnel B is 1 ft. 3 in. lower than in funnel A.
A major factor in producing a clean ship is the high efflux velocity of the exhaust
gases in the full and part power conditions. Effux velocities in this ship are high and
vary between 110 ft./sec. with power of 12,000 shp to 80 ft./sec. at 1,000 shp. As
already stated grit arresters are fitted.
It will be noted that a gutterway is fitted around the top of the funnel so that rain water
can be drained away to prevent discoloration of the funnel sides.
Exhausts from the galley, laundry and lavatory fans, and from the diesel generator and
incinerator are led up inside the funnel.
Electrical Installation
When considering the generator requirements it was decided that:
a. when the Royal party is on board or when the ship is in use as a hospital ship it
would be necessary to have steam on the main boilers and the steam turbogenerators would carry the electrical load. For harbour use at other times a
diesel generator would be installed to cover the harbour load,
b. the diesel generator would not be used at sea because of noise and vibration,
c. the generator capacity provided must be capable of meeting requirements with
adequate standby power,
d. the emergency dynamo required by M.O.T. regulations to be regarded as a
completely separate item to the above commitments.
The dynamo load at sea was estimated to be approximately 730 kW and the harbour
diesel load bout 250 kW.
The following generators are fitted in Britannia for lighting and power supplies:
3 500 kW steam turbo-generators.
1 270 kW diesel generator.
1 60 kW emergency diesel generator.
Consideration was given to fitting an a.c. installation in accordance with recent
Admiralty policy for H.M. ships, but once again, the time factor precluded the
possibility of obtaining delivery of new generators in time to avoid delay in
completion of the ship. Furthermore, most of the main machinery auxiliaries were
planned for electrical drive; the economic operation of these auxiliaries, including
boiler-room fans, depended upon the availability of a speed control range not
obtainable with standard type a.c. motors.
Considerable difficulty would also have been experienced in obtaining delivery of d.c.
turbo-generators in time to meet the completion date of the ship, and it was therefore
fortunate that three 500 kW d.c. machines were available and not otherwise required.
These machines were not compounded, however, and it was necessary for this to be
done, and for further modifications to be made to meet Lloyds requirements before
the generators could be installed in Britannia.
The d.c. installation in Britannia is at a constant voltage of 225, all permanent wiring
being on the two wire, two conductor system with both poles insulated.
The three turbo-generators are fitted in the generator room and any two are capable of
supplying the full sea-going load. The 270 kW diesel, also fitted in the generator
room, is capable of meeting the harbour load or the salvage load when steam is not
Sea Trials
A full programme of contractors sea trials which included speed, turning,
manoeuvring, and consumption trials were successfully completed in November
1953. We were greatly honoured and encouraged by His Royal Highness, The Duke
of Edinburgh, who was present on one day during the sea trials and who displayed a
most active and keen interest in the ship and her performance.
During the measured mile speed trials on the Arran course, a full speed of 22.85 knots
was obtained with the ship at 4,320 tons displacement and the machinery developing
12,400 shp at 289 rpm. The propulsive coefficient related to the naked hull ehp
deduced from the model results at full speed was 0.6. This will be recognised as a
favourable performance, the more so as weather conditions were adverse. There was a
moderate sea and wind speeds at times reached 50 knots. The wind was more or less
on the beam and caused the ship to heel to leeward a few degrees; during a
particularly heavy gust it reached 10 dg. Rudder angle of about 4 deg. was necessary
to maintain a steady course in the most adverse conditions.
Fuel consumption was measure during trials of four hours duration, each at a steady
horsepower. After making adjustments for the maximum seagoing auxiliary load
likely to be met on service, the fuel consumption is estimated to be about 47 tons/day
at 2,800 shp and 117 tons/day at 12,000 shp.
In the load condition carrying 330 tons of oil fuel the endurance will be about 2,100
miles at 20 knots and 2,400 miles at the economical speed of 15 knots, with clean
bottom.
Using the extra fuel tank capacity available for long ocean passages and carrying 490
tons of oil fuel the endurance is increased to approximately 3,100 miles at 20 knots
and 3,560 miles at 15 knots.
It will be recalled that oiling at sea arrangements are fitted so that if necessary
Britannia can refuel at sea from the attendant ship.
Careful records were taken of any measurable vibration over a wide range of steady
speed and also during manoeuvring. Generally, vibration was very small. Maximum
vibration was recorded on the upper deck at the extreme stern during full-power trials
when the double amplitude of vertical vibration was at times 0.014 in. and of
transverse vibration 0.006 in. The frequency was four times the shaft speed and
consistent therefore with excitation from the propeller blades. Very occasional
transitory vibration of the stern was also noted during full-power trials at
comparatively low frequency not consistent with the shaft speed nor the propeller
blade beats. This may have been excited by blows from the sea as the frequencies
were commensurate with the estimated natural hull frequencies mentioned earlier in
the paper. Very small local vibration was noted in a few positions and additional
stiffening has been added as considered necessary. The large measure of freedom
from any measurable vibration fully confirmed the detailed investigations made
during the progress of the design.
Objectionable singing, which was traced to one propeller only, was experienced
during sea trials. In consequence, the spare propellers were shipped after having been
modified at short notice by carefully machining the backs of the blades to finer edges.
Considerable improvement resulted, but a note was still detected at a low speed.
There was also a note at slightly higher speed, but this was eliminated by a small
differential adjustment of propeller revolutions between the two shafts. The propellers
not fitted have been accepted as an interim measure because the singing is at speeds
lower than any likely to be used on passage. Modifications to the original propellers
will be made with a view to the complete elimination of singing.
Manoeuvring and turning trials verified the ready response of the ship to the rudder.
The tactical diameter at 21 knots approach speed ws 625 yards, i.e. 5 lengths, and
the average rate of turn was slightly more than 1 deg. per second. Despite the
adverse weather, there was reasonable agreement between the port and starboard turns
and good readings were obtained from photographic bearing recorders.
No really rough weather had been experienced by the ship at the time of preparing
this paper but the behaviour in the moderate sea and strong winds met on the sea trials
was in all respects satisfactory and the ship was completely dry apart from occasional
spray. Forced rolling trials were carried out to test the Denny-Brown stabilizers. The
ship was rolled through a maximum angle of 30 deg. out to out at 21 knots ship
speed with the fins operating at an angle of 19 deg. each way. A further
comprehensive programme of trials has been arranged to follow commissioning and it
is hoped this will afford an opportunity of proving the qualities of the ship in rough
weather.
The names of makers of equipment mentioned in this paper have been purposely
excluded, but details of the equipment have been given in most cases in the relevant
trade publications.
The author wishes to thank Messrs. John Brown & Co. (Clydebank) Ltd., and also the
Aerodynamics Division of the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, for the
information they have kindly supplied for inclusion in this paper.
Appendix
APPENDIX I
The Principles and Assumptions made in the Analysis of Vibration Characteristics
Basic Functions
A Basic Function is defined as that distribution of static load along a uniform
beam, which produces a distribution of deflection similar to the load distribution.
Basic Functions are therefore solutions of the differential equation of flexural
oscillations of a prismatic bar having cross-sections which are small compared with
the length.
Application of Basic Functions in Ship Vibration
When a ship vibrates, the structure is subject to a dynamic distributed load
proportional to the mass distribution (including the mass of entrained water), to the
profile of vibration and to the square of the circular frequency. The load may be split
up into Basic Functions analogous to a Fourier series analysis. The flexural rigidity
of a ship may also be expressed as a series, the terms of which will be the second
derivatives of the corresponding Basic Functions.
The effects of shear deflection and rotary inertia are to modify the coefficients of the
load series; the corrections being obtained from simple bending theory.
The distribution of the mass of entrained water is found from consideration of
reference (3) below.
The ratios of coefficient of the load series and the corresponding values of critical
frequency may then be determined by substitution in the differential equation of
motion.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were applied in the analysis:
1. A ships structure may be treated as a conservative system.
2. The orthogonality condition holds for the normal modes of vibration.
3. The simple theory of bending may be applied to a ship.
4. The ratio of shear rigidity to flexural rigidity is a constant along the ships
length for any particular mode of vibration.
5. The rotary inertia varies as the second derivative with respect to time of the
sum of the flexural and shear deflections, rather than the flexural deflection
alone.
The following papers were consulted freely for information during the investigations
and proved invaluable.
(1) INGLIS, C.E. The determination of critical speeds and natural frequencies and
modes of vibration by means of Basic Functions. North East Coast Institution.
Volume 61.
(2) RICHARDS, J.E. An analysis of ship vibration using Basic Functions. North
East Coast Institution. Volume 68.
(3) LEWIS, F.M. The inertia of the water surrounding a vibrating ship.. Society of
Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Volume 37.
(4) LANG, D.W., and WARREN, W.G. Structural strength investigations on
destroyer Albuera. TRANS.I.N.A., 1952, p. 243