Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This paper was prepared for presentation at the International Petroleum Technology
Conference held in Doha, Qatar, 2123 November 2005.
This paper was selected for presentation by an IPTC Programme Committee following review
of information contained in an proposal submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as
presented, have not been reviewed by the International Petroleum Technology Conference
and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not
necessarily reflect any position of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, its
officers, or members. Papers presented at IPTC are subject to publication review by Sponsor
Society Committees of IPTC. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this
paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the International Petroleum
Technology Conference is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an
abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must
contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write
Librarian, IPTC, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
Abstract
In a drilling program, the design of wells has historically been
an incremental process in which compiled experience from
previously drilled wells is the principal driver for realizing
drilling design. The efficiency of drilling in a field, and as a
result, the cost, typically improves significantly initially,
before reaching a point at which little improvement is
achieved. The progression from the initial well to the final
wells of a mature drilling program is often referred to as the
"drilling learning curve." Rather than focus on getting the
design right after several wells, it is possible to outperform the
learning curve by developing and applying fundamental
physics-based models and computational optimization engines
up front to quantitatively analyze well design options. These
proprietary tools have been applied extensively in field
development planning, as well as in real-time, to ensure
optimal drilling performance.
This paper describes
ExxonMobil's approach to physics-based modeling, advanced
mathematical optimization, and real-time updating to achieve
drilling performance that both accelerates and undercuts the
historical learning curve.
Specific business examples
illustrating successful applications of this approach are
presented.
Introduction
Optimal well design requires attention to both fundamental
engineering principles and site-specific learnings. The drilling
learning curve, which identifies adjustments to initial design
parameters to improve overall well design, can frequently cut
50% or more from well costs over the course of a continuous
program. While a variety of learning-based well design
techniques have served the industry well, the biggest prize is
achieved by utilizing physics and mathematics to shift the
optimization process from the learning curve to the initial well
design getting it right the first time.
ExxonMobil's approach to going beyond the learning curve
is based on routine application of proprietary technology that
Cost
Historical approach
Well #
Figure 1: Representation of the savings of the Physics-Based
Well Design
IPTC 10709
10500
10750
11000
11250
11500
11750
12000
Predicted Caliper (10.4% B/O)
12250
12500
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
IPTC 10709
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Distribution
ss
Probability of Drilling Succe
4 strings
450
Well
Cost
0
17.5
410
370
330
17.0
16.5
Mud Weight
(ppg)
250
16.0
15.5
290
Flow Rate
(gpm)
IPTC 10709
Field Examples
There are numerous examples worldwide of how ExxonMobil
has used the Physics-Based Well Design, covering six
continents, on land, in shallow and deep water, with vertical
and highly deviated wells, and in almost every type of weather
climate and operating condition imaginable. Here, three such
cases are presented Hibernia, Chayvo, and a development
drilling program in the Middle East.
In 2003, a well was drilled from the Hibernia platform, off
the eastern coast of Newfoundland [4]. The well was highly
deviated, and planned to have the world record longest reach
of 30,699 ft MD (9400 m) for its vertical depth (12,993 ft or
>3000 m TVD). The well design relied on proprietary models
to achieve substantial life cycle cost savings over a subsea
well design. Real-time drill cuttings analyses using DCM
were performed to monitor wellbore stability. As a result, the
original recommendations were revised to incorporate a
lowered mud weight requirement in the 8-1/2-inch hole. The
Chayvo Bay
Barrier Island
Sea of Okhotsk
18 5/8'' Casing
1000
Depth TVD (m)
To determine how to access the reserves of a field, a multidisciplinary well team may view the geologic data in the
three-dimensional visualization environment (Figure 4).
Geoscientists and engineers develop quantitative forecasts of
downhole conditions, such as pressure, temperature, and stress
gradients. They can easily extract data for their analyses along
any proposed well path to assist in well planning. The data is
communicated by special linkages to analysis software, such
as those described in the context of the Physics-Based Well
Design. Using the recommendations of the well design tools,
this team can then weigh well path options versus the target
requirements and drilling location options. In this way, using
customized visualization software, they collectively and
interactively choose the best wellpath to reach the reservoir
targets. Through this process, visualization capabilities enable
the efficient evaluation of competing well designs as well as
the rapid analysis of planned and current drilling operations.
13 5/8'' Casing
2000
3000
7 Liner
10423 m MD
2600 m TVD
4000
-1000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
IPTC 10709
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
Stable Wellbore
30%
20%
0%
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
14.5