Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IW
July Polity
KI
IW
Content
Interstate River Water Disputes
11
12
12
13
KI
IW
Content
'Govt. for uniform surrender policy for Maoists'
13
13
14
15
15
16
17
17
18
18
19
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
KI
IW
Content
National Mineral Policy
25
25
26
26
27
Law Commission of India Submits its Report on Setting Up New Courts in the
27
28
Targeting NGOs
28
29
30
31
31
32
33
34
35
37
37
KI
IW
Content
Law Commission Report on 'Death Penalty'
38
40
KI
IW
The inter-State river water sharing disputes relating to Godavari, Krishna (of May
1976), and Narmada are settled with the publication of decisions of respective Tribunal.
The Ministry of Water Resources provides Central Assistance under the Accelerated
Irrigation Benefits Programme (AIBP), to the State Governments to speed up the
implementation of on-going irrigation projects.
inter state water dispute, PIB, polity, river water dispute, river,
Ravi & Beas Water Tribunal Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan Cauvery Water Disputes
Tribunal Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Puduchery Krishna Water Disputes
Tribunal -II Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra VansadharaWater Disputes
Tribunal Andhra Pradesh &Odisha MahadayiWater Disputes Tribunal Goa, Karnataka
and Maharashtra
i. Mullaperiyar Dam for implementing the order dated 7.5.2014 of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court.
ii. Babhali Barrage on 24.10.2013 for implementation of the Order dated 28.2.2013 of
Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Consider the facts: four names including those of Gopal Subramanium (along with
another former solicitor general, Rohinton Nariman, and two high court chief justices,
Adarsh Goel and Arun Mishra) had been unanimously recommended for appointment
to the Supreme Court in early May by the five-member collegium headed by Chief
Justice of India R M Lodha.
The attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary originated in 1973, after
the Kesavananda Bharati 5 judgment (which struck down some constitutional amendments
by saying that the basic structure of the Constitution could not be amended). At that
time, judges were appointed by the government in "consultation" with the Chief Justice
of India as provided for by the Constitution. The government then said that it was not
bound by the advice of the Chief Justice. Successive Congress governments thereafter,
especially during the tenure of law minister, H R Bharadwaj, appointed judges who
had proximity to the government. The subversion of the independence of the judiciary
Page 1
KI
IW
by the appointment of convenient judges became a major issue, especially with increasing
corruption within the executive.
The issue of the manner of appointment of judges was first raised in S P Gupta's case
6 in 1981. The question was whether the government or the Chief Justice should have
primacy in the matter of appointment of judges, especially because the independence
of the judiciary had been declared a basic feature of the Constitution. In that case, the
majority held that primacy in judicial appointments was with the government and it
could disregard the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the matter of appointments
and transfers of judges and chief justices. But as this led to more brazenly partisan
appointments, the issue was referred to a larger bench for reconsideration.
Finally in 1993, the view in S P Gupta's case was reversed by an innovative judgment
in the Supreme Court Advocates on Records case, 7 which wrested the control in the
matter of judicial appointments from the executive and vested it with the judiciary. The
words "in consultation with the chief justice" was interpreted to mean, "with the consent
of the chief justice". The meaning of chief justice was interpreted as a collegium of the
Chief Justice of India plus three senior judges of the Court. In fact, a new elaborate
procedure was laid out by the Court for appointment of judges, in which the role of the
government was reduced to returning a name recommended by the collegium for
reconsideration. If the collegium reiterated its recommendation, the President would
have no option but to go through with the appointment. High court appointments would
also go through a similar procedure, except that the recommendations there would
originate from the collegium of the high courts.
In 1998, the Supreme Court further tweaked its judgment of 1993 in a Presidential
Reference on this issue. 8 The collegium was widened to five judges. Consultation with
other judges in the court who came from the same high court as the proposed nominee
was also provided for. But the control over the appointments continued to vest with the
judiciary.
This system of appointment of judges by the judiciary did lead to the depoliticisation
of the judiciary to a large extent and did substantially improve its independence. But
the process of appointments was still shrouded in secrecy and with the control over
appointments in the hands of sitting judges who had little free time in the midst of their
judicial work, coupled with the lack of transparency in such appointments, led to
nepotism and arbitrary appointments.
There were also serious voices like that of Justice Krishna Iyer who called this an
incestuous system and a snatching of appointments by abuse of judicial power. 9 Even
Justice J S Verma, the author of the original judgment, came to say that he did not
anticipate that his judgment would lead to such poor appointments by the judiciary. 10
The Committee on Judicial Accountability 11 (a voluntary body of senior lawyers and
Page 2
KI
IW
retired judges) proposed a bill for the constitution of a full-time and independent body
called the Judicial Appointments Commission for the selection of judges to the high
courts and the Supreme Court It was proposed that such a body could be constituted
from among retired judges or other eminent persons who would be selected in the
following manner: The chairman to be selected by the collegium of all judges of the
Supreme Court. A second member by the collegium of all chief justices of the high
courts. A third member by the union cabinet. A fourth by collegium of the leaders of
opposition of the two houses of Parliament along with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
A fifth by a collegium of the chief election commissioner, the comptroller and auditor
general and the central vigilance commissioner. Each of these members of the Judicial
Appointments Commission would have a tenure of five years and would thus be
independent of the government as well as of the sitting judiciary.
This body would be mandated to function transparently and would have to publish the
persons shortlisted for appointment for the information of and comments by the public
before the final selection was made. Being a full-time body, it would lay down the
criteria for selection and would be mandated to go about its task in a structured and
rational manner.
A National Judicial Commission Bill of 2013 12 was eventually introduced by the UPA
government, which sought to create an appointments commission in which the
appointments pie was sought to be divided almost equally between the judiciary and
the government. The proposed commission was supposed to have the three senior-most
judges of the Supreme Court along with the law minister and two eminent persons
nominated by a committee consisting of the prime minister, leader of opposition in the
Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India. Thus, the commission was still conceived as
largely an ex officio body of people who would have little time to devote to appointments
and it also did not lay down any standards of transparency in making the appointments.
This bill too ran into a lot of criticism from various quarters, particularly from judges
and the legal community. It was therefore not taken further and has now lapsed with
the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha.
Prior to 1993 the executive had the upper hand, with the requirement of consulting the
judiciary but not obliged to accept its views. The Second Judges Case virtually reversed
this position, and in the Presidential Reference of 1998 set down the details of the
collegium system. The names are to be put forth by a collegium consisting of the Chief
Justice of India (CJI) and his four senior-most colleagues. The government may return
a name with objections; but if the collegium still reiterates its choice, the appointment
must go through. The judiciary has the first, and last, word.
Page 3
KI
IW
The 1993 decision itself was accepted without much protest by the political class, which
was surprising since it was a major constitutional shift achieved without amendment.
Over the years the executive has largely accepted the appointments proposed by the
Court. Where there was a difference, the judges prevailed.
Gopal Subramanium, however, was in a different category. He has never been a judge
before; he fell under another category envisioned in Article 124, viz, advocates. Since
Independence only a handful of judges have come from this source - notably Chief
Justice S M Sikri, Justices Kuldip Singh and Santosh Hegde.
The collegium system has been criticised by almost everyone but the collegium for
being opaque and non-transparent without giving even legitimate stakeholders like the
Bar a chance to scrutinise the proposed appointees. The judicial commission under
discussion contemplates members other than the CJI and two senior judges; the law
minister is on it, and the prime minister has a say in appointing two more. The judiciary
has been wary of sharing its turf, and has resisted this proposal. Given the recent
happenings, will it dig in even more? And will other players scent a warning in the
winds that blew last month? This government blocked an appointment without being
on the appointing body; what will happen when it is part of it?
The Congress case for grant of the LoP status is that it is not just a matter of status or
perquisites or the ministerial rank that goes with the post that is important. What is
critical is that the LoP in the Lok Sabha, thanks to Supreme Court decisions and
legislative provisions, now plays a much larger systemic role.
The official LoP is a member of panels that selects key officials, including the Chief
Commissioner of the Central Vigilance Commission , the Chief Information Commissioner,
the Lokpal, the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation, the National Human
Rights Commission and the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha.
That precedent was followed by the Congress itself when in power, and for long periods
in the history of the Lok Sabha there was no recognised leader of the opposition. The
rationale was that the leader of the opposition being in line to form an alternative
government should be able to hold the House with the required quorum of 10 per cent
of its strength. The 10 per cent rule was established by G.V. Mavalankar and incorporated
Page 4
KI
IW
later in the Directions for the functioning of the Lok Sabha as Direction 121, though it
did not mention the LoP as such. The 1998 law concerning the facilities to be given to
leaders and whips of recognised parties and groups, which fixes 55 as the minimum
number of members required for recognition as a Parliamentary Party in the lower
House, does not mention the LoP either. It is the 1977 statute on the LoP's salary that
does so. And that definition says the LoP shall be the leader of the party in opposition
with the greatest numerical strength and "recognised as such" by the Speaker. While
the statute itself is silent on it, the question arises if the Speaker, while recognising the
LoP, needs to go by parliamentary precedent and Direction 121.
Further, there are recent laws that require the leader of the opposition to be part of
selection panels for the Central Vigilance Commissioner, the Chief Information
Commissioner, the Lokpal and the CBI Director. Some of the relevant Acts do say that
where no person has been recognised as the LoP, the leader of the opposition party with
the largest numerical strength may play that role. A recognised leader of the opposition
is necessary for the proper and harmonious functioning of Parliament and for the working
of several of the recently enacted laws. Legal ambiguity, the Congress party's own
flawed record and the BJP's triumphalism over its rival's poor electoral performance,
should not stand in the way of an important parliamentary office being filled.
he rules have been framed in 1977 and would be followed. He also cited the example
of 1984 when the TDP was not accorded the status.
While Congress has secured 44 seats in the 543-member Lok Sabha, government
managers have said it was less than the requisite strength of 10 per cent of the House's
total strength to make the party eligible to get the post
Insisting that the powers of the Speaker are "neither arbitrary, nor unbridled or unilateral"
on deciding the issue, Congress spokesman Randeep Surjewala said the post of the
Leader of the Opposition is a "constitutional right" of Congress as the biggest party in
the opposition as also the biggest pre-poll alliance.
the presence of a Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha is mandatory in the appointment
of statutory watchdogs such as the Central Vigilance Commissioner, the Central
Information Commissioner and, of course, the Lok Pal.
Page 5
KI
IW
The Act itself provides for the vacancy in the collegium. The absence, or vacancy,
makes no difference to the appointment process
Section 4 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, concerning appointment of the
Chairman and Members of the Lokpal, envisages the process of selection of a national
ombudsman in Clause 1.
The Chairperson and Members shall be appointed by the President after obtaining the
recommendations of a Selection Committee consisting of (a) the Prime Minister; (b)
the Speaker of the House of the People; (c) the Leader of Opposition in the House of
the People; (d) the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court nominated
by him; and (e) one eminent jurist as recommended by the Chairperson and Members,
the Government source pointed out, it is followed by Clause (2), which says "no
appointment of a Chairperson or a Member shall be invalid merely by reason of any
vacancy in the Selection Committee."
In other words, there will be no countervailing opinion and the Government will have
a free run in the appointment of CVC, CIC, members of the Lok Pal as well as the
Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation.
The CBI was sought to be given autonomous status last year, when its Director was
appointed by a collegium similar to the Lokpal. Additionally, the CVC monitors all
vigilance activities in the Central government.
The statutes have been created to fight corruption in public life and ensure accountability
on the part of public officials, including the Prime Minister. The presence of the Leader
of Opposition in all these panels has been deemed necessary to ensure autonomy and
independent functioning of these watchdogs.
The Centre has sought a clarification from the Supreme Court collegium headed by
Chief Justice R.M. Lodha on the recommendation to elevate Justice K.L. Manjunath
of the Karnataka High Court as the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Highly placed sources in the Law Ministry told The Hindu that clarification was being
sought in view of certain complaints received against him by the government. Sources
said the Ministry wanted to ascertain from the collegium whether these complaints had
been considered before making the recommendations.
Mr. Justice Manjunath's elevation will come through only if the collegium reiterates
the recommendation by giving the required clarification.
Page 6
KI
IW
The Centre's move has come within weeks of its opposition to the elevation of senior
advocate Gopal Subramanium as a Supreme Court judge. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta,
who was transferred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court in September 2010, has been
shifted back to the Punjab and Haryana High Court on medical grounds.
The Supreme Court held on Monday that fatwas issued by Muslim shariat courts
(Dar-ul-Qazas) do not have legal sanctity and cannot be enforced if they infringed on
the fundamental rights of an individual.
Disposing of the petition, the Bench said the fatwa had no legal sanction. "It cannot be
enforced by any legal process, either by the Dar-ul-Qaza issuing it or the person
concerned, or for that matter anybody."
The Bench said the fatwa could simply be ignored. "In case a person or a body tries to
impose it, the act would be illegal." The Bench said fatwas on rights, status and obligation
of individual Muslims, in its opinion, would not be permissible unless asked for by the
person concerned or, in cases where the person is unable to do it, by the person interested.
"Fatwas touching upon the rights of an individual at the instance of rank strangers may
cause irreparable damage and, therefore, would be absolutely uncalled for. It shall be
in violation of basic human rights. It cannot be used to punish the innocent. No religion,
including Islam, punishes the innocent," the Bench said.
The Supreme Court on Thursday said that workload on it is "excessive" and inflow of
cases before it is "uncontrolled" and asked the Bar to suggest measures for speedy
disposal of cases.
Justice Lodha said he had recently interacted with 12 Chief Justices of other countries
and none of their Supreme Courts handles such a large number of cases.
In some Supreme Courts, only 150 appeals are heard in a year and the CJs were astonished
when I told them that on Monday and Friday, we deal with at least 800-900 cases," he
said.
Page 7
KI
IW
Collegium stands firm on Justice Manjunath
The Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice R.M. Lodha on Tuesday stood
firm on its recommendation to elevate Karnataka High Court Justice K.L. Manjunath
as Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. It rejected the Law Ministry's
objections, in having returned the Karnataka judge's file for reconsideration, as baseless
and unfounded.
With the recommendation having been reiterated, the Centre is bound to accept the
collegium's decision to elevate Justice Manjunath. At the most, the government can
delay the process of appointment.
The Ministry wanted to ascertain from the collegium whether certain allegations in the
complaints received were considered before making the recommendations.
The Centre had earlier put on hold the elevation of senior advocate Gopal Subramanium
as a Supreme Court judge. The CJI had criticised the government for unilaterally
segregating his file and approving the elevation of three High Court Chief Justices. The
collegium accepted Mr. Subramanium's letter withdrawing his consent and put an end
to the controversy.
A bare reading of its judgment delivered on July 7 in Vishwa Lochan Madan v. Union
of India would suggest otherwise.
At the outset, both the Court and the petitioner have confused two issues. The first is
of fatwas being issued by clerics, and the second is of shariat courts. The two issues
are independent and distinct. A fatwa is an opinion on a religious matter which ought
to be sought from and delivered by a well-read religious scholar. As is the case with
every opinion, it is up to the querist to accept or reject it.
From the early twentieth century, an institution called the Dar-ul-Qaza, known in
common parlance as the shariat courts, has been operating in many parts of the country.
The Dar-ul-Qaza is devised as a permanent alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
mechanism to resolve family disputes of consenting parties. Like in arbitration, if both
parties agree, instead of a civil court they may approach the Dar-ul-Qaza for resolution
of their disputes. The Dar-ul-Qaza does not issue fatwas. It also does not administer
criminal law; it simply resolves family disputes by applying principles of Islamic law,
which even civil courts are bound to apply in cases where both parties are Muslim
Page 8
KI
IW
In response to the petition, all the Respondents took a common stand. Broadly speaking,
their argument seemed two-fold -- first, that the Dar-ul-Qazas were not in the nature of
civil or criminal courts but were, in fact, institutions devised as ADR mechanisms. Like
other ADR mechanisms, this could also be used by consenting parties to resolve their
private disputes out of court; no one can be forced to acquiesce to the jurisdiction of
the Dar-ul-Qaza. Second, fatwas issued by clerics were merely their opinions on given
queries and like any other opinion they were not binding on anyone.
It agreed with the Respondents that a fatwa is merely an opinion and neither a fatwa
nor a decision of the Dar-ul-Qaza can be enforced like a court decree. According to the
Court, for this reason, neither a fatwa nor a decision of the Dar-ul-Qaza has any "sanction
under our Constitutional scheme." However, it categorically upheld both the establishment
and functioning of the Dar-ul-Qaza as well as the practice of issuing fatwas, adding
that "this does not mean that existence of Dar-ul-Qaza or for that matter, practice of
issuing fatwas are themselves illegal.
The Supreme Court judgment, though it could have been better-worded, is sensible. It
is mindful not only of the law of the land and the deplorable condition of Indian Muslims
but also of religious sensitivities in the country. It seeks to strike a judicious balance
among all three. However, the judgment does not make any practical difference to the
legal position as it existed till the day it was delivered. It will neither stop the self-seeking
ignorant mullas from issuing bizarre fatwas, which are an onslaught on the basic tenets
of Islam, nor prevent ill-informed people from publicly expressing their ostensibly
anti-Islamic prejudices under the garb of supporting the cause of equality before law.
The practice followed by the collegium of the higher courts, before a candidate is
recommended for elevation and a panel of names is sent to the government for
appointment, is as follows The Chief Justice initiates a consultation with the legal
fraternity. Speaking in confidence to senior advocates and fellow judges, to both the
bar and the bench, a long list of possible candidates for elevation is prepared. Based
on these recommendations the Chief Justice then invites the candidates to determine
their willingness to be considered. If the candidates are willing then they are required
to furnish details about themselves, such as their contributions to the law especially
with respect to important cases, the extent of their legal practice, their annual income,
their legal history, etc. These details are then processed by the court administration,
during which time, I suppose, the court gets inputs from relevant investigating agencies
about whether they have any legal proceedings against the candidate, etc. other inputs
that may make them ineligible for consideration.
Page 9
KI
IW
Based on (i) the recommendations of the legal fraternity, (ii) the willingness of the
candidate, and (iii) the hard data relating to the legal practice and public standing of
the individual, the file is placed before the collegium. The collegium then scrutinises
the information on record and, based on the highest standards of judicial scrutiny, arrives
at a decision on whom to recommend and whom to ignore, from the names before it.
Not every name that comes up through this process gets the approval of the collegium
Assuming complete information was available to the collegium, we now have to consider
the contrasting positions of the collegium and the government. Based on the same facts
considered by the collegium, the government is at liberty to give an alternative reading
and argue for the unsuitability of a particular candidate. This is legitimate since the
political lens of the government may be at variance with that of the collegium. The
disagreement, at this stage, has to be on political grounds and not on facts. The procedure
then requires the government to place its disagreement before the collegium which can
either restate its earlier recommendation or revise it in the light of the arguments made.
This second stage is constitutionally sacrosanct since contained in it is the core principle
of the separation of powers. The collegium has to deliberate on this contrary opinion
of the government and decide whether, by accepting or rejecting it, the independence
of the judiciary is eroded or enhanced. The decision that emerges from this review must
indicate where the power of decision in the last instance, lies, with the government or
with the court. Both parties must give clear reasons for their positions so that the final
decision taken can educate the public on the core issue of separation of powers. The
government's reasons and the collegium's views, as well as the facts of the matter,
should be made public to serve, as the Supreme Court in the P.J. Thomas case said, the
larger public interest.
Three basic issues for our democracy emerge from this controversy. The first is the
issue of public attitude.
The second issue concerns the doctrine of separation of powers. By segregating the
names, did the President give primacy to the executive over the judiciary?
The third issue concerns Gopal Subramanium's withdrawal of consent. By resigning
he prevented the issue from developing into a constitutional face-off between the
executive and the judiciary. Ronald Dworkin, the great legal and political philosopher,
in Taking Rights Seriously , recommends such a face-off since he believes that only in
such a situation will we be able to distinguish between just and unjust laws.
Page 10
KI
IW
Towards a comprehensive Juvenile Justice law
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (JJ Act) has been
amended twice: in 2006 and in 2011. Besides crimes committed by juveniles, violence
against them is also emerging as an important issue which needs to be redressed by
strengthening the existing provisions. Protracted inter-country adoption procedures in
the existing JJ Act need urgent legislative resolution. While personal laws allow specific
communities to adopt, other persons can become guardians only under an archaic
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. A secular gender-neutral adoption law for all people
is required.
n Stephanie Joan Becker v. State (2013), a single 53-year-old lady was permitted to
adopt a 10-year-old girl orphan by relaxing the guidelines of the Central Adoption
Resource Authority (CARA). Likewise, in Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India (2014),
the apex court that upheld the right to adopt and to be adopted as a fundamental right,
also held that every person, irrespective of the religion he/she professes, is entitled to
adopt. The judgment in Jan Balaz v. Anand Municipality (2010) is under challenge in
the Supreme Court. Twin German children born through surrogacy were granted an
exit permit on the Court's directions to CARA to permit their adoption by German
parents.
The apex court in a public interest litigation decided on March 28, 2014, in Dr.
Subramanian Swamy and others v. Raju and others , refused to read down the provisions
of the JJ Act, 2000, in order to account for the mental and intellectual competence of
a juvenile offender and refused to interfere with the age of a juvenile accused, in cases
where juveniles were found guilty of heinous crimes. It was held by the Court that the
provisions of the Act are in compliance with Constitutional directives and international
conventions. The Court further stated that the classification of juveniles as a special
class stood the test of Article 14 of the Constitution, and that the Court should restrict
itself to the legitimacy and not certainty of the law.
In this backdrop, the Government of India is now contemplating re-enacting a new JJ
Act, 2014, for which a review committee has been constituted under the Ministry of
Women and Child Development. The baton has been passed on to Parliament to enact
a new law.
The word 'juvenile' has been replaced with the word 'child' and the expression
'juvenile in conflict with the law' has been changed to 'child in conflict with law.'
While in the JJ Act, 2000, juveniles in conflict with the law are defined as the 'accused',
the draft Bill identifies a 'child in conflict with law' to be one who has been found by
the Juvenile Justice Board to have actually committed an offence. It also defines an
Page 11
KI
IW
'abandoned child' as well as 'aftercare'. Chapter two is the most noteworthy characteristic
of the proposed Bill, providing for 'Fundamental Principles for Care, Protection,
Rehabilitation and Justice for Children'. It incorporates internationally accepted
principles of presumption of innocence, dignity and worth, family responsibility,
non-stigmatising semantics, privacy and confidentiality, repatriation and restoration,
equality and non-discrimination, and diversion and natural justice, among others.
Institutionalisation is suggested as a measure of last resort -- juveniles are to institutionalised
only if no other family-based care option is possible or available.
A new procedure for handling children in conflict with law has been proposed. A
revamped Child Welfare Committee has been identified, empowered and given statutory
functions. Mandatory registration of childcare institutions has been provided. Observation,
shelter and special homes may be established by State governments.
The Congress' four-page letter demanding the Leader of the Opposition post points
out that the LoP has a larger systemic role to play as a member of panels that select the
Central Vigilance Commissioner, the Chief Information Commissioner, Lokpal, the
Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation, National Human Rights Commission
(NHRC) members and the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha. To deny the largest
Opposition party the Leader of Opposition status would therefore amount to "scuttling
democracy."
The BJP's argument is that the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of the Opposition in
the Parliament Act, 1977, has to be read with the Speaker's Direction 121 that mandates
that an Opposition party must get at least 10 per cent of the seats in the Lok Sabha to
get the post.
"As a student of India's parliamentary tradition, I should flag that the decision of
appointing the LoP has since 1953 been taken by the Speaker," he added.
The Law Minister said since 1969, the tradition was to give LoP status to the leader of
the party with at least 10 per cent members in the House.
"Between 1971 and 1977 there was no LoP, again between 1980 and 1989 there was
no LoP. In all these 60 years the same rules have applied. The decision regarding LoP
has been taken by Speakers of all shades, from Rabi Ray of the Janata Party to Shivraj
Page 12
KI
IW
Patil and Meira Kumar of the Congress and Somnath Chatterjee of the CPM...
In the country's multi-party polity, the role of Governors under the Constitution has
been a sensitive aspect of Centre-State relations. Given that some Governors have in
the past played a partisan role during moments of political instability, and some have
been accused of using Raj Bhavans for political ends, the need to appoint as governors
eminent personalities who would be above the political fray rather than active political
functionaries, has been advocated to remove a major irritant. The National Democratic
Alliance government had a golden opportunity to demonstrate its democratic credentials
while appointing new Governors. It could have chosen eminent personalities outside
the political realm in line with the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission on
Centre-State relations and moved away from the beaten path of turning Raj Bhavans
into rehabilitation homes for over-the-hill politicians.
The fact that five political functionaries closely linked with the BJP have been appointed
as Governors reflects poorly on the willingness and ability of major political parties to
bring about meaningful change in the political culture.
The Home Ministry is keen on ensuring that all States have a uniform 'surrender and
rehabilitation' policy for Naxals/militants who turned themselves in.
The graph of violence had reduced in the country in recent years, thanks to better training
and coordination among the security forces and a reduction in the vacancies in State
police, which stood at six lakh earlier.
While 2010 was the peak year in terms of violent incidents, now there were just a few
sporadic incidents of major violence, he said.
Same retirement age of 65 for Supreme Court and High Court judges, a "cooling-off
period" for judges after retirement and a fixed tenure for Chief Justice of India.
These are the three changes Law Commission Chairperson A.P. Shah has recommended
Page 13
KI
IW
Former Chief Justice of India V.N. Khare on Tuesday said Union Finance Minister
Arun Jaitley, at a consultation held between the Law Ministry and eminent jurists on
setting up a Judicial Appointments Commission, had promised that there would not be
a repeat of the pre-collegium days in the judicial appointments process.
Justice Khare supports the "dominance" of the judiciary in the Judicial Appointments
Commission. "We want judges to have dominance because they are acquainted with
the working of the judges shortlisted for selection. Unlike persons from outside, who
depend on IB reports, we [judges] keep a close watch on the work of the particular
judges and often come across their judgments,"
Page 14
KI
IW
'Collegium system: solution worse than the disease'
Law Commission of India chairman Justice A.P. Shah lauded Chief Justice of India
R.M. Lodha's move to invite distinguished members of the Bar as judges of the highest
court.
he said the Judicial Appointments Commission was a step in the right direction to free
judicial appointments from "inappropriate politicisation." "Ultimately, the rationale of
having the Commission instead of the collegium system is to strengthen the quality of
appointments made, promote diversity and sustain public confidence in judicial system
But the Bill in its current form remained silent on transparency and offered no role to
the civil society in judicial appointments. "The mere setting up of a Judicial Appointments
Commission cannot solve the problem of the present system of appointment of judges
Birth of collegium system The tussle between the executive and the judiciary for control
over the process of judicial appointments has its origins in what has come to be known
as the First Judges' case. In that case the Supreme Court, led by former Chief Justice
of India P.N. Bhagwati came down in favour of the executive stating that "the Chief
Justice of India, the Chief Justice of the High Court and such other Judges of the High
Court and of the Supreme Court as the Central Government may deem it necessary to
consult, are merely constitutional functionaries having a consultative role and the power
of appointment resides solely and exclusively in the Central Government."
In 1993 however, in the Second Judges' case, the Supreme Court led by former Chief
Justice of India J.S. Verma overruled the First Judges' case. According to Justice Verma,
in the actual working of this process, even the executive attached primacy to the role
of the Chief Justice of India in the matter of appointments to the superior judiciary. He
thus went on to hold that "the selection should be made as a result of a participatory
consultative process in which the executive should have the power to act as a mere
check on the exercise of power by the Chief Justice of India, to achieve the constitutional
purpose."
This decision led to the birth of the collegium system of appointing judges to the higher
judiciary, the working of which was set out in the Third Judges' case by former Chief
Justice of India S.P. Bharucha. The collegium system of appointing judges to the High
Court is of particular relevance for our purposes; the collegium must take into account
the opinion of the Chief Justice of India which "would be entitled to the greatest weight,"
Page 15
KI
IW
the views of other Judges of the High Court who may have been consulted and the
views of colleagues on the Supreme Court bench "who are conversant with the affairs
of the concerned High Court."
Reforming process of appointments while the executive has no role in the appointment
of judges, in theory it continues to exert significant pressure on the collegium in practice.
Speaking in the Second Judges' case, Justice Verma opined that the collegium system
would ensure "the hyperbolic executive intrusion to impose its own selectee on the
superior judiciary is effectively controlled and curbed." If the Gopal Subramanium
episode and the allegations of Justice Katju are anything to go by, the exact opposite
seems to be happening.
Given the current state of affairs, the Judicial Appointments Commission would
somewhat institutionalise what is already happening in practice as it would consist of
the Chief Justice of India, the two seniormost judges of the Supreme Court, the Union
Law Minister, and two eminent persons.
Page 16
KI
IW
Commissions of Enquiry have no contempt power, says SC
A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has reiterated that truth in the
publication of a news item can be treated as defence in contempt of court proceedings.
The court, however, held that Commissions of Enquiry have no power to initiate
contempt proceedings against newspapers.
the Contempt of Courts Act had been amended and a provision had been inserted to
the effect that 'truth' could be claimed as a defence.
Dismissing the contempt proceedings, the Bench said "When a sitting Supreme Court
Judge is appointed as a Commissioner by the Central Government, he does not carry
with him all the powers and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. We do not have any
doubt that functions of the Commission are not like a body discharging judicial functions
or judicial power. The Commission in our view is not a Court and making the inquiry
or determination of facts by the Commission is not of judicial character."
Alarmed by the spike in polio cases that occurred during 2013 and subsequently, the
World Health Organization declared in May this year that the international spread of
naturally-occurring 'wild' polioviruses constituted a Public Health Emergency of
International Concern. Some 60 per cent of polio cases last year were, it said, the result
of the virus spreading to other countries and there was increasing evidence that adult
travellers had contributed to this spread.
Pakistan, along with Cameroon and Syria, were categorised as 'States currently exporting
wild polioviruses' and asked to take measures that included vaccinating international
travellers. (Equatorial Guinea was later placed in the same category.)
"Providing polio vaccines as part of a package of health services is a better way to
engage local communities and religious leaders than through a narrow, polio-specific
programme," he noted in the article. The emphasis on polio, to the neglect of other
health services, had long fuelled beliefs that polio immunisation was an external initiative
operating for outsiders' benefit.
Page 17
KI
IW
Repeating RTI applications shall be ground for refusal: CIC
Setting a new ground for refusal of information under the RTI Act, the Central Information
Commission has said filing of repeated RTI applications by an applicant seeking similar
information shall be a reasonable ground for rejecting the plea for which reply has been
given.
The citizens have no right to repeat the same or similar or slightly altered information
request under the RTI Act, 2005, for which he already got a response
To solve the problem of such repetitive pleas, the Commissioner recommended that
respondent authority should analyse all the RTI applications filed by such appellants,
compile all the questions and indicate the information provided against them.
"That consolidated information along with a background note based on facts, avoiding
unfounded allegations may also be placed on web site besides sending a copy to the
applicant and the concerned Information Commission," he said.
the prioritized sectors and strategies devised for development of North Eastern States
during the 12th Plan
Faster development of Connectivity (Road, Rail, Air, Inland Waterways)
Roads:
major road connectivity projects like: East West Corridor, all stretches of SARDP-NE
connecting State Capitals and Districts, Trans Arunachal Highways, major bridges, etc.
Railways: Broad Gauge (line conversion) like Guwahati-Dibrughar-Tinsukia, Rangia
- Murkongselek Bridge (rail cum road) across Brahmaputra at Bogibeel, Lumding Silchar and Kumarghat - Agartala - Sabroom
Airways:
Airport Development works at Guwahati, Dibrugarh, Silchar, Agartala, Shillong, Imphal
and Dimapur.
Inland Water Transport: Emphasis on development in the Brahmaputra and Barak
National Waterway.
Page 18
KI
IW
I. Railways:
Master Plan for development of railway infrastructure in the North-Eastern States
includes:i) connectivity to all State capitals.
ii) unigauge broadgauge network in the region.
iii) augmentation of network capacity for handling growth of traffic in future
iv) expansion of network to unconnected areas of the region.
Page 19
KI
IW
v) Strengthening international borders.
vi) Improving trade and connectivity with neighbouring countries.
II. Telecommunication:
Comprehensive Telecom Development Plan for North East Region (NER) includes :(i) Provision of 2G mobile coverage in identified uncovered areas.
(ii)
NER.
(iii)
Ensuring reliability of and redundancy in the transmission network at State
capitals and district headquarters in NER.
III. Roads:
Special Accelerated Road Development Programme for North East (SARDP-NE)
includesupgradation of 10141 km road stretches of National Highways and State Roads
aims to upgrade National Highways connecting State Capitals to 4 lane or 2 lane and
to provide connectivity to all 88 District Headquarter towns of NER by at least 2-lane
road.
IV. Power:
Development of power sector inter-alia includes:(i) Generation: A generation capacity addition programme of 5596 MW in the North
Eastern Region;
(ii) Transmission:
(a) A comprehensive scheme for strengthening of transmission and distribution system
in Arunachal Pradesh & Sikkim at an estimated cost of Rs.4754.42 crore;
V. Inland Waterways:
Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) has a mandate to develop National
Waterways including National Waterway-2 (River Brahmaputra) from Bangladesh
Border (near Dhubri) to Sadiya for the purpose of inland water transport and Development
of Barak River from Lakhipur to Bhanga (121 km) as
a National Waterway
at an estimated cost of Rs.141 crore at 2014 price.
Page 20
KI
IW
Centring the Northeast
The Northeast today needs a skilful politico-economic person who can take the region
out of its insurgency grip, mobilise leaders of substance and work out a decentralised
multi-level development strategy aimed at fostering the region's growth.
stuck in politico-bureaucratic status quo, even after Prime Minister Narasimha Rao
placed it under special focus as part of the Look East Policy in 1991.
half-heartedly in view of strategic and logistical problems emanating from sporadic
bursts of violence by terrorist and insurgent groups operating on both sides of the border.
The northeastern States account for about 8 per cent of the country's geographical area.
They share less than 2 per cent of their borders with other Indian States and share 98
per cent with Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar and the Tibetan region (of China). The
challenge is to convert this location disadvantage into an opportunity. This can be done
by opening up the seven-State gateway to more than millions of ASEAN consumers
for trade, commerce and education.
The Northeast can be rejuvenated by making the region a focal point for growth.
Removing the Restricted Area Permit and Inner Line Permit would help to integrate
the region with the rest of India.
A healthy economy, innovative tourism-oriented packaging of rich tribal heritage, and
projecting modern facets of society are the keys to solving this problem. The success
of Nagaland's Hornbill Festival is one example of how the region can add to India's
cultural richness.
The Northeast has higher standards of living and literacy, but it also has an unbalanced
economy and suffers from a terrible industrial sickness. Except Meghalaya, all the
States in the region face a power shortage, despite the fact that the Northeast has a huge
reserve of hydroelectric potential (30,000 to 40,000 MW). Power apart, the region needs
special efforts for the development of world-class infrastructural network of roads and
railways, for strengthening the telecom sector, healthcare services, and tapping into the
agricultural industry and the region's rich biodiversity. It can also emerge as a hub for
higher education for the entire Southeast Asian belt.
We need to examine ways and means of creating a unified common market of nearly
40 million people which will provide a big boost to the economy of the region. We also
have to ensure a massive investment flow for infrastructural development on both sides
of the border in order to improve connectivity for trade and commerce. This will help
the emergence of local entrepreneurs. As it is, the Delhi-Hanoi rail link, trilateral
Page 21
KI
IW
highway project between India, Myanmar and Thailand, and some other initiatives have
got bogged down by red tapism and a lack of political will.
At the human level, there exists a big gulf between people from the hills and people
from the plains. This has resulted in creating a trust deficit. Recent ugly incidents in
Delhi have only reaffirmed the distance that separates the Northeast from mainstream
India.
In the long run, the Northeast, as an expert put it, can become a partner in "a wider
Brahmaputra-Yangtze-Mekong quadrant." Let us hope for the best. Over to Prime
Minister Modi.
A separate law with specific provisions to protect people from the northeast living in
different parts of the country along with amendment of sections of IPC has been
suggested by M P Bezbaruah committee that was set up after increased attacks on
citizens from the region.
The Bezbaruah Committee was set up after the death of Nido Tania, 20, following an
altercation with shopkeepers and others at the Lajpat Nagar in south Delhi in January.
The sources said that the committee, however, made no suggestion for enactment of
an anti-racial law but strengthening and proper implementation of existing laws.
The Terms of Reference of the committee were to examine the various kinds of concerns,
including those regarding security of people hailing from the northeast; to examine the
causes behind the attacks/violence and discrimination against them; to suggest measures
to be taken by the government to address these concerns; and to suggest legal remedies
to address these concerns.
The Committee under the Chairmanship of Shri M.P. Bezbaruah, Member, North
Eastern Council and other members today submitted its report t
The terms of Reference of the Committee were as follows:(i) To examine the various kinds of concerns, including the concerns regarding security,
of the persons hailing from the North Eastern States.
Page 22
KI
IW
(ii) To examine the causes behind the attacks/violence and discrimination against the
people from the North-Eastern States.
(iii) To suggest measures to be taken by the Government to address these concerns.
(iv) To suggest legal remedies to address these concerns.
he segregation of Mr. Gopal Subramanium's name was done unilaterally by the Executive
without my knowledge and concurrence which was not proper."
At no cost the independence of the judiciary will be allowed to be compromised. I will
not hold my office if I feel that the independence of the institution of the judiciary has
been compromised.
As per the new rules, government employees have to file returns with details of cash
in hand, bank deposits, investment in bonds, debentures, shares and units in companies
or mutual funds, insurance policies, provident fund, personal loans and advance given
to a person or any entity, among others.
The employees need to declare motor vehicles, aircraft, yachts or ships, gold and silver
jewellery and bullion possessed by them, their spouses and dependent children.
The employees also to have to give details of their immovable properties along with
statement of debts and other liabilities on first appointment or as on March 31 of every
financial year.
The rules however, provide for the competent authority to exempt a public servant from
filing the information in respect of any asset if its value does not exceed his or her four
months basic pay or Rs 2 lakh, whichever is higher.
Though the system of declaration of assets and liabilities has been in vogue, the Lokpal
Act seeks to systematise it with additional information. While the Lokpal Act became
operational in 2013, rules framed by the then United Progressive Alliance government
on some of the provisions were contested by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
Page 23
KI
IW
Incentives to Industries to Boost Economic Growth
The Ministry has taken a series of steps to revive the industrial growth including
announcement of National Manufacturing Policy (NMP) in 2011, simplification and
rationalization of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy, implementation of Delhi
Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) project, conceptualization of four more Industrial
Corridors viz Chennai-Bengaluru Industrial Corridor, Bengaluru-Mumbai Economic
Corridor, Amritsar Kolkata Industrial Corridor and East Coast Economic Corridor,
launching of the e-biz Mission Mode Project under the National e-Governance Plan,
taking proactive steps for ease of doing business by taking stock of best practices across
states and endorsing them, identifying and simplifying the approval procedures etc.
North-East Industrial & Investment Promotion Policy, 2007, and specific programmes
like Modified Industrial Infrastructure Upgradation Scheme, Indian Leather Development
Programmes etc.
16 National Investment and Manufacturing Zones(NIMZS) to Boost Manufacturin Wed, Jul 9, 2014
PIB, economics, Manufacturing, nimz, industrial corridors, national manufacturing
policy,
In order to boost manufacturing sector, the government has already announced setting
up of sixteen national investment and manufacturing zones (NIMZs). The National
Manufacturing Policy (NMP) has the objective of enhancing the share of manufacturing
in GDP to 25 per cent and creating 100 million jobs over a decade.
Till 2013-14, 16 NIMZs are being set up. Of these, eight are along the Delhi Mumbai
Industrial Corridor (DMIC). Besides, eight other NIMZs have been given in-principle
approval: (i) Nagpur in Maharashtra, (ii) Chittoor in Andhra Pradesh, (iii) Medak in
Andhra Pradesh (now Telengana), (iv) Prakasam in Andhra Pradesh (v) Tumkur in
Karnataka, (vi) Kolar in Karnataka, (vii) Bidar in Karnataka, and (viii) Gulbarga in
Karnataka.
The project, spans the states of Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh,
Gujarat, and Maharashtra along the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) of the
Railways. The DMIC Development Corporation (DMICDC), incorporated in 2008, is
the implementing agency for the project.
he Chennai-Bengaluru-Chitradurga industrial corridor (around 560 km) will benefit
the states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu.
India and the United Kingdom have signed an MOU for the development of a new
Page 24
KI
IW
The Minister of State for Mines, Steel and Labour & Employment, Shri Vishnu Deo
Sai has said that with the liberalization of mineral sector since 1993 which led to private
sector participation, mineral production depends broadly on availability of mineral
resources, economic viability, demand of market etc.
as per National Mineral Policy 2008, the conservation of mineral shall be construed
not in the restrictive sense of abstinence from consumption or preservation for use in
the distant future but as a positive concept leading to augmentation of reserve base
through improvement in mining methods, beneficiation and utilisation of low grade
ores and rejects and recovery of associated minerals. The Government is aiming for an
adequate and effective legal and institutional framework mandating zero waste mining
as the ultimate goal and a commitment to prevent sub-optimal and unscientific mining.
the dual use items (having military as well as civilian applications) other than those
specifically mentioned in the list would not require industrial license from defence
angle.
As per the Defence Production Policy, 2011, Government aims to create conditions
conducive for the private industry to take an active role in production of defence
equipment, to enhance potential of SMEs in indigenization and to broaden defence
R&D base of the country.
214 Letters of Intent / Industrial Licences have been issued till June 2014 for manufacture
of a wide range of defence items to public / private companies.
Further, Defence Procurement Procedure has been amended to accord 'Buy (Indian)',
'Buy & Make (Indian)' and 'Make' categories of capital acquisition higher priority
Page 25
KI
IW
over other categories to encourage indigenous defence production in public and private
sector. In the Union Budget 2014-15, it has been announced that the composite cap of
foreign exchange is being raised to 49% with full Indian management and control
through the FIPB route.
Mr. Kharge said the Speaker has been told that the Congress is the single largest party
and the Leader of the Opposition post is now more important because of the LoP being
part of the decision-making process in the appointment of CVC and Lokpal.
He said the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977,
makes it abundantly clear that the single largest party should be given the LoP post.
"Representative of the party which has the largest number in the opposition should be
recognised as the Leader of the Opposition", he said, adding no rules can override a
statute.
In order to engage the youth of the country in the nation's development, the Government
on Saturday launched a portal where citizens can discuss and share thoughts, empowering
the people to contribute towards good governance through various tasks and discussions.
the portal -- MyGov -- will be a platform that empowers the citizen to contribute towards
Surajya.
MyGov presents an opportunity to citizens to both 'discuss' and 'do.' There are multiple
theme-based discussions on MyGov where a range of people would share their thoughts
and ideas,
Further, any idea shared by a contributor will also be discussed on these discussion
forums, allowing constructive feedback and interaction. Citizens can upload documents,
case studies, pictures, videos, and other work plans on the platform.
. The platform has also been divided into various groups -- Clean Ganga, Girl Child
Education, Clean India, Skilled India, Digital India and Job Creation.
Those who wished to go beyond discussions and contribute on the ground, MyGov
would offer several avenues to do so. Citizens can volunteer for various tasks and submit
their entries, which would then be reviewed by other members and experts.
Page 26
KI
IW
SC Constitution Bench to decide on `living will' to die with dignity
A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will take up for consideration
on Wednesday a petition seeking to declare the execution of a `living will' of persons,
suffering from chronic terminal diseases and likely to go into a permanent vegetative
state, to refuse treatment to pave way for their death.
The PIL was referred to Constitution Bench by a three-judge bench. Mr. Bhushan
submitted that when a medical expert opined that the person afflicted with the terminal
disease had reached a point of no return, then they should be given the right to refuse
being put on a life support system to prolong their agony. The issue had been wrongly
referred by three judges as one concerning euthanasia, he said and added that it pertained
only to execution of living will to die with dignity when there was no hope of survival.
Mr. Rohatgi said the issue had lot of legal, social and moral aspects concerning the
humanity as a whole. He said right to die merely because of pain and suffering would
not be in the interest of society as it was against public policy. Any change in the law
could be brought about only by Parliament, he added and said the ruling in `Aruna
Shanbaug's case', which upheld the validity of passive euthanasia, was wrong.
Law Commission of India Submits its Report on Setting Up New Courts in the
Some of the highlights of the conclusions and recommendations are as below:i) Recruitment of new judges should focus, as a matter of priority, on the number of
judges required to breakeven and to dispose of the backlog, in a 3 year time frame;
ii) Age of retirement of Subordinate judges be raised to 62.
iii) Special morning and evening Courts be set up for dealing with Traffic/ Police
Challan cases which constitute 38.7% of the institutions and 37.4% of all pending cases
in the last three years before the Subordinate Judicial Services.
iv) Recent law graduates may be appointed for short durations, e.g. 3 years, to preside
over these special traffic Courts.
v) Adequate provisions be made for staff and infrastructure required for the working
of additional Courts.
vi) High Courts be directed to evolve uniform data collection and data management
Page 27
KI
IW
methods in order to ensure transparency and to facilitate data based policy prescriptions
for the judicial system.
vii) Creation of additional Courts is one amongst various measures required to ensure
timely justice and facilitate access to justice. The Commission recognizes that apart
from increasing judge strength, many other measures have to be undertaken for reducing
delays, including the application of good judicial management practices such as putting
into place timeliness and performance benchmarks.
Chhattisgarh has maintained silence over the Supreme Court notice it received on a
petition challenging the functioning of its Tribes Advisory Council, an empowered
body for safeguarding interests of Schedules Tribes (STs) under Fifth Schedule of the
Constitution.
the Chhattisgarh government has filed a response in the apex court, claiming parliamentary
democracy does not give discretionary power to its governors. Citing some earlier
judgements of the Supreme Court, the state claimed that the governor has no discretionary
power but has to depend on the aid and advice of the council of ministers in matters of
functioning of TAC.
The Chhattisgarh government has cited Ramjawaya Kapoor judgement (1955) and
Shamsher Singh judgement of 1974 whereas petitioner cited Bhuri Nath judgement of
1997, Samatha judgement 1997 and MP Lokayukta judgement of 2004.
The high court had accepted the contention of the Chhattisgarh government that governors
do not have discretionary powers in Fifth Scheduled areas and that they are bound by
aid and advice of council of ministers of the state government.
Targeting NGOs
The very first paragraph of the report states as follows: "A significant number of Indian
NGOs (funded by some donors based in the U.S., the U.K., Germany, the Netherlands
and Scandinavian countries) have been noticed to be using people-centric issues to
create an environment which lends itself to stalling development projects." It goes on
to specify the projects thus: "These include agitations against nuclear power plants,
uranium mines, coal-fired power plants (CFPPs), genetically modified organisms
(GMOs), mega industrial projects (Posco and Vedanta), hydel projects (at Narmada
Sagar and in Arunachal Pradesh) and extractive industries (oil, limestone) in the
Page 28
KI
IW
north-east."
The I.B. report paraphrases this as follows: "A small group of activists and NGOs at
times have succeeded in shaping policy debates in India. Apart from that, in some cases
it is observed that in a cyclical process, an NGO is set up, funds are obtained from
abroad, a few articles are commissioned, a PR firm is recruited and, slowly, with the
help of the media an image is created. And then awards are procured from foreign
countries to enhance the image, after which government machinery finds it more difficult
to act against the awardee."
In India, the plans of multinational corporations such as Vedanta, Posco and Monsanto
have faced resistance not only from mass movements but also from the judiciary. Their
projects involve massive displacement of people, especially indigenous tribal communities,
in various parts of India.
Kudal Commission
Indira Gandhi had initiated the Kudal Commission of Inquiry against NGOs. "This
comparison imparts a kind of historical significance to the present report and the related
actions that would emanate from it. In many ways, it necessitates and facilitates a
recount of the NGO-civil society involvement in the Indian political and developmental
space," he said.
The Kudal Commission, headed by Purushottam Das Kudal, was set up in 1982
immediately after Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980. The premise for setting up
the commission was that a number of NGOs in the country were funded and controlled
by the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and that they were trying to
destabilise India. The Kudal Commission report is still not available comprehensively,
but indications are that it did uphold Indira Gandhi's premise that the CIA was involved
with many major opposition forces and leaders during that period.
The Bharatiya Janata Party manifesto identifies 'reform [of] the legal system' to make
it more 'accessible to the common man' as a key policy objective for the new government.
too much of the academic and policy debate on the reform of statutory codes has focussed
on two problems: first, desuetude (old and outdated laws) and second, over regulation
(too many laws). However, a law's vintage is not the primary basis for judging its
utility. Further, we cannot identify whether there is over regulation unless we can show
that identical contexts are over determined by two or more legal rules. Moreover, it is
not the volume of regulation but its contradictory effects that should be the focus. In
Page 29
KI
IW
this essay we propose that the primary and urgent problem for statutory reform is 'unruly
and inaccessible regulation' and a coherent institutional response to this problem will
effectively set the stage to tackle the problems of desuetude and over regulation as well.
The first step is to create a central repository of all existing Central laws, and the rules
and regulations of the various regulatory bodies and executive agencies. However, the
maintenance, availability and accessibility of these resources are seriously compromised,
and there is no assurance that the online versions are authoritative statements of the
law that may be relied upon in legal proceedings. The preliminary step should be to
clean up this database, confirm its legal authority and ensure that all legislation,
amendments and subordinate legislation are available together in one place and searchable
by subject matter. Only if this activity is carried out expediently and with diligence and
care will the next step become feasible, which, as we explain, is critical for the problems
of desuetude and over regulation to make themselves visible.
The next step is to create a subject-based compilation of all existing laws and regulations,
akin to the United States Code (USCo) and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
The legal authority of such a subject-matter code must also be clear. There is not much
point in undertaking this herculean task of rearranging existing laws by subject matter
if the resultant rearrangement cannot be relied upon by the users of the law.
The benefits of this type of consolidation are undeniable. For one, it replaces the 20 or
more laws that are likely to be applicable on a given subject with one comprehensive
code. This process intrinsically overcomes desuetude and overregulation. Significantly,
unlike an ad hoc repeal exercise, this type of consolidation will resolve inconsistent
laws, clarify ambiguities in the law on a particular subject, and restate the law subject
using a consistent drafting style and consistent word choices while leaving no 'gaps'
in the law.
The reform of statutory codes in India is an idea whose time has arrived. The popular
perception of the Indian legal system is now couched in the language of ridicule and
humour rather than respect and inspiration. However, the ad hoc culling and editing of
laws to respond to perceived problems of desuetude and over regulation is likely to
create more problems than it solves. A national project to reform the statutory codes
through the steps outlined above is our best hope to put the legal system reform on
well-grounded and sustainable foundations.
In January, the Supreme Court had ruled that "inordinate and inexplicable" delays in
hanging were grounds for commuting a convict's death penalty and had spared 15 death
Page 30
KI
IW
A five-judge Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice R.M. Lodha and Justices
J.S. Khehar, J. Chelameswar, A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Nariman passed the restraint
order till July 22, when the matter relating to the release of life convicts in the Rajiv
Gandhi assassination case would be taken up for hearing.
issued notices to the States seeking their response by July 18 to seven questions, including
whether they could exercise their remission power under Section 435 Cr.P.C.
Page 31
KI
IW
Legalising intelligence gathering
Page 32
KI
IW
Discussions in the CCS and the core group tend to remain restricted to immediate or
emergent security problems. There is seldom the inclination to devote time to debate,
analyse and develop long-term policy options, strategies or consequences. Though there
is a National Security Council and an Advisory Board of experts to cater to some of
these issues, these bodies do not always meet regularly. Structural channels to utilise
their inputs through pinpointed action agendas have not fructified.
need to bring all central agencies under one umbrella to ensure seamless integration in
their operations, assessments and response.'
Page 33
KI
IW
beneath the lawful limit has proven exceedingly difficult under the watchful, and now
recorded, gaze of the Election Commission. In order to keep expenditure sheets in the
green, campaign expenses are increasingly channeled through political parties.
The Commission operates with a procedural distinction between candidate and general
party canvassing. For instance, even though a candidate may feature prominently on
the dais at a public rally, as long as his or her name, constituency and photograph are
not mentioned or displayed, the political party absorbs the entire cost of the event.
. As candidate expenditure confronts increased scrutiny, campaign expenses are migrating
to party exchequers for which stringent controls are notably absent.
The objective of the National Water Policy, 2012 is to assess the existing situation and
to propose a framework for a plan of action with a unified national perspective.
The salient features of national water policy (2012) are as follows:
1. Emphasis on the need for a national water framework law, comprehensive legislation
for optimum development of inter-State rivers and river valleys.
2. Water, after meeting the pre-emptive needs for safe drinking water and sanitation,
achieving food security, supporting poor people dependent on agriculture for their
livelihood and high priority allocation for minimum eco-system needs, be treated as
economic good so as to promote its conservation and efficient use.
3. Ecological needs of the river should be determined recognizing that river flows are
characterized by low or no flows, small floods (freshets), large floods and flow variability
and should accommodate development needs. A portion of river flows should be kept
aside to meet ecological needs ensuring that the proportional low and high flow releases
correspond in time closely to the natural flow regime.
4. Adaptation strategies in view of climate change for designing and management of
water resources structures and review of acceptability criteria has been emphasized.
5. A system to evolve benchmarks for water uses for different purposes, i.e., water
footprints, and water auditing be developed to ensure efficient use of water. Project
financing has been suggested as a tool to incentivize efficient & economic use of water.
6. Setting up of Water Regulatory Authority has been recommended. Incentivization
of recycle and re-use has been recommended.
7. Water Users Associations should be given statutory powers to collect and retain a
Page 34
KI
IW
portion of water charges, manage the volumetric quantum of water allotted to them and
maintain the distribution system in their jurisdiction.
8. Removal of large disparity in stipulations for water supply in urban areas and in rural
areas has been recommended.
9. Water resources projects and services should be managed with community participation.
Wherever the State Governments or local governing bodies so decide, the private sector
can be encouraged to become a service provider in public private partnership model to
meet agreed terms of service delivery, including penalties for failure.
10. Adequate grants to the States to update technology, design practices, planning and
management practices, preparation of annual water balances and accounts for the site
and basin, preparation of hydrologic balances for water systems, and benchmarking
and performance evaluation etc.
Page 35
KI
IW
President Chandrika Kumaratunga told IPS News. China is second to Japan as Sri
Lanka's largest lender of development assistance.
Since the end of the island nation's decades-long ethnic civil war in 2009, during which
Tamil rebels (LTTE) demanding regional autonomy for their community, human rights
organisations say the ruling United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA) has made little
progress in ameliorating pervasive human rights violations such as extrajudicial killings
of Tamil civilians, disappearances following detention by security forces and the
weakening of checks on executive power through media freedom and judicial independence.
A report by an advisory panel to the UN secretary-general has accused both the LTTE
and the Sri Lankan government of alleged war crimes during final stages of the civil
war. In March this year, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) authorised the High
Commissioner of the HRC to investigate if human rights abuse occurred.
The development in Sri Lanka follows in the wake of similar move to muzzle civil
society in India. Soon after the Narendra Modi-led BJP government assumed power at
the Centre, India's Intelligence Bureau submitted it a classified document, identifying
several foreign funded NGOs that are "negatively impacting economic development"
of the country. A significant number of these NGOs have been noticed to be using
people-centric issues to create an environment which lends itself to stalling development
projects, read the report.
While NGOs like Greenpeace have rubbished the report, saying that the intent of their
campaigns are deliberately misunderstood and that this is a conscious attempt to crush
and stifle opposing voices in the civil society, several other NGOs are worried about
the intention of the government.
While there is no denying that NGOs should be transparent about their funds--in fact
the Ministry of Home Affairs already keeps a tab on NGO funding and their international
donors because only those organisations registered with the Foreign Contributions
Registration Act are eligible to receive funds from foreign donors--the government
should also be concerned about issues raised by these NGOs.
Its directive on July 1, prohibiting NGOs from holding press conferences and workshops,
appears to be a reaction at public criticism by some NGOs and activist groups at the
government's support for the radical Buddhist supremacist organisation, known as
Bodu Bala Sena or BBS. The government was widely criticised for not preventing or
arresting those behind a BBS-inspired pogrom against Muslim communities on June
15 and 16.
Page 36
KI
IW
Government favours Aadhaar-NPR synergy
In a bid to clear confusion and duplication between the National Population Register
(NPR) and Aadhaar cards, the NDA government has decided to explore the possibility
of a synergy between the two ambitious projects of the previous UPA government.
The Home Ministry has already suggested that the NPR and Aadhaar schemes be merged
under the Registrar General of India (RGI) or division of work between the two should
be in such a way that enrolment is done entirely by NPR while the Unique Identification
Authority of India (UIDAI), which runs Aadhaar, carries out deduplication ahead of
generating the unique number.
The Home Minister has already set a three-year deadline to identify genuine Indian
citizens through the NPR project. The government also wants enumerators to conduct
door-to-door verification and issue NPR cards to Indian nationals only.
It is also planning to link NPR to voting rights which would mean that voter ID cards
would not be the sole document for eligibility to vote, officials said.
Other steps taken in the recent past to effectively combat corruption include:(i) Enactment of Right to Information Act, 2005;
(ii) Enactment of Lokpal & Lokayuktas Act, 2013;
(iii) Issue of comprehensive instructions on transparency in tendering and contracting
process by the CVC;
(iv) Issue of instructions by the CVC asking the organizations to adopt Integrity Pact
in major Government procurement activities; State Governments have also been advised
to adopt Integrity Pact in major procurements;
(v) Introduction of e-Governance and simplification of procedures and systems;
(vi) Issue of Citizen Charters;
(vii) Ratification of United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) in 2011;
(viii) Placing of details of immovable property returns of All Members of the All India
Services and other Group 'A' officers of the Central Government in the public domain;
Page 37
KI
IW
(ix) The Whistle-blowers Protection Act, 2011 (No. 17 of 2014);
t ran counter, Sinha noted, to the diktats of Bachan Singh vs State of Punjab , 4 which
remains the central law governing capital punishment in India. Here, the Supreme Court
had ruled that
The consequences of Ravji were disastrous. At least 15 criminals had been sentenced
to death as a result of the decision, and for two of them - Rao and Ram - the Supreme
Court's admission of its own error had come too late.
the court pointed out that even after its declaration that Ravji had been erroneously
decided, it had continued to render irrelevant a criminal's socio-economic background
in determining the sentences of numerous convicts.
In a letter dated 1 July 2012, the group implored the government to commute the
sentences of 13 persons in seven different cases to life imprisonment. Capital punishment
in each of their cases, the retired judges pointed out, had been awarded based on a
now-admittedly flawed application of the law. "This matter goes to the very heart of
our Constitution and the system of democratic government", they wrote, "because it
involves the taking of lives by the state on the basis of judgments admitted to be
erroneous by the Supreme Court."
Recently, the Supreme Court had to intervene to commute to life imprisonment the
sentences of 15 convicts on the death row. In Shatrughan Chauhan vs Union of India
9 the Court ruled that an unreasonable delay in disposing a mercy petition filed by a
person on the death row was tantamount to torture, and was valid ground for commuting
his or her death sentence. 10 For instance, in the case of Gurmeet Singh, one of the
petitioners before the Supreme Court, there had been a delay of more than seven years
in the disposal of his mercy petition by the governor and the president. As a result,
Singh had spent 26 years in custody - more than double what most convicts sentenced
to life imprisonment undergo.
There is, the commission believes, a woeful lack of research on the issue of death
penalty in India in spite of the glaring iniquities highlighted in the Supreme Court's
jurisprudence.
The challenges in Bachan Singh were made on three primary grounds. First, the death
penalty infracted the six freedoms comprised in Article 19(1) of the Constitution. Since
capital punishment served no clearly identifiable social purpose, and since its deterrent
effects were unproven, at best, it was argued that it could not represent a reasonable
Page 38
KI
IW
Page 39
KI
IW
Are you listening in on me?
In what could be a shot in the arm for champions of individual privacy the world over,
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week that a law enforcement agency could not search
a telephone belonging to a suspect or any other person without obtaining a search
warrant from the competent judicial authority. The investigator may have entered some
premises under a lawfully obtained warrant. But if he chances to come by a telephone
in the building, he would need another authorisation to examine the instrument to
explore whether it had any stored information pertaining to the probe.
The State attorney argued that there were twin dangers in waiting for a court order:
one, a phone could be used to trigger a timed explosive device and two, waiting for a
judicial approval could facilitate the person under investigation obliterating vital
information contained in the phone that could otherwise establish his criminality or of
anyone acting in concert with him.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision came a few months after it heard two cases in
which the defendants questioned the validity of evidence collected by the police following
a warrantless search of their telephones.
There are two fundamental issues here. Telephones, especially the handy mobile phones,
have become ubiquitous and are being used by their owners to store vital information,
not only because of the convenience involved, but the confidentiality they afford.
Second, in the hands of investigating agencies they become an invaluable tool from
which to ferret out evidence. It is our experience that even the most unlettered and
inarticulate investigator these days resorts to a cell phone to search for the missing
pieces as soon as he sets off for an investigation.
The Indian police are especially known for their arbitrariness. Respect for the statutory
procedure is minimal, especially with regard to fundamentals of criminal investigation,
such as prompt registration of a complaint, search of a crime scene and the arrest of a
suspect. Non-registration of complaints, informal and illegal detention of suspects and
searches without a warrant are a regular feature. When this is the case it may be
preposterous to demand that the examination of the contents of a phone must be preceded
by court permission. As far as we know, courts do not take umbrage at the practice of
investigating officers using questionable methods to collect data contained in a phone.
In fact, no questions are asked by the judge, and he simply laps up what is presented
without checking how exactly the material was seized. It may take decades for us to
make it obligatory for investigating agencies to obtain an exclusive warrant to examine
the contents of a telephone. An apex court ruling on the subject will greatly help.
The relevant law in our country is Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 as
Page 40
KI
IW
Page 41