Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In the next few weeks lecture, we will consider Greens function for different linear differential
equations. As we shall see, this is a very valuable constructive technique for determining solutions
to certain boundary value problems. In the discussions, we will assume domain to be an open
bounded set, with a piecewise smooth boundary . With appropriate assumptions on the decay
of solutions, it is possible to take the limiting case of such domains as it becomes infinite size.
1
ln r for n = 2
2
1
for n = 3
4r
r2n n2
G0 (r) =
for n > 3
(n 2)2 n/2
G0 (r) =
Lemma 2 G0 (|x x0 )|) satisfies G0 = 0 for x 6= x0 , for any fixed x0 . Further, for any R,
Z
G0
dx = 1
|xx0 |=R n
while for continuous function f (x) continuous at x0 ,
Z
G0
lim+
dx = f (x0 )
f (x)
n
0
|xx0 |=
Proof. We use radial coordinate r centered about x0 . So r = |x x0 |. Using expression for
Laplacian is radial coordinates we get
G0 =
n1 d
d2
G0 (r) +
G0 (r) = 0
dr2
r dr
for r 6= 0, as can be readily verified from expression for G0 (r). Further, we note that
Z
G0
dG0
Rn1 (Area of n dimensional unit sphere) = 1
dx =
dr r=R
|xx0 |=R n
Given > 0, there exists so that if r < , then |f (x) f (x0 )| < . Then, using the above
G0
dG0
0
result on the integral dG
dr , we obtain | n | = dr ,
Z
G0
|
|f (x f (x0 ||
n
|xx0 |=
1
Therefore,
|f (x0 )
|xx0 |=
G0
f (x)dx|
n
|xx0 |=
G0
|f (x) f (x0 )|dx ,
n
x0
|xx0 |
=
n
Proof. Define to the domain with a sphere of radius around x0 excluded (See Fig. 1).
Z
(u G0 (|x x0 |) u G0 (|x x0 |)) dx
=
Z
Z
G0 (|x x0 |
u
u
G0 (|x x0 |)
u
=
dx
dx
G0 (|x x0 |)
G0 (|x x0 |) u
n
n
n
n
|xx0 |=
(1)
n
n
|xx0 |=
As 0+ since u(x) is continuous at x0 , we know from last Lemma that the second term is
simply u(x0 ). On the otherhand, the first term above tends to zero as 0+ since rn1 G0 (r)
u
is continuous at x0 . We also notice that
0 as r 0, while n
Z
lim+
G0 (|x x0 )|)udx = 0
0
|xx0 |<
since limr0 rn1 G0 (r) = 0 and local volume element dx near x = x0 scales as rn1 . Therefore,
combing all these results in (1), the Lemma follows.
Corollary 4 If C () with compact support K contained in , then
Z
(x0 ) =
G0 (|x x0 |)(xdx
Proof. This follows immediately from last theorem, once we realize that for such functions ,
both and its derivatives are all 0 on .
Definition 5 The Greens function G(x, x0 ) of the operator in a domain Rn is defined
as a function that satisfies the following conditions:
1. G(x, x0 ) satisfies G(x, x0 ) = 0 for any x 6= x0 in .
2. G(x, x0 ) = 0 for x .
including at
3. The function G(x, x0 ) G0 (|x x0 |) as a function of x is in C2 () C1 ()
x = x0 .
Remark 2 In the context of electro-statics, for n = 3, G(x, x0 ) is the electro-static potential
created by a point charge x0 in a domain where the boundary is maintained at zero potential
(by earthing for instance).
Lemma 6 (Symmetry of Greens function) For any domain , the Greens function is symmetric, i.e.
G(x, x0 ) = G(x0 , x)
Proof. Consider the domain shown in Figure 2 that has two small holes, each of radius
and centered at a and b cut out from . Let u(x) = G(x, a) and v(x) = G(x, b). It is clear that
each of u, v are harmonic in and hence
Z
Z
v
u
u
{uv vu} dx =
0=
dx + A + B
(2)
v
n
n
where
u
v
dx
v
u
A =
n
n
|xa|=
Z
v
u
B =
u
dx
v
n
n
|xb|=
Z
We know
lim A = lim
0)
0+
[H(x) + G0 (|x a|]
v
dx = v(a)
v
[G0 (|x a|) + H(x)]
n
n
|xa|=
from using Lemma 2 and the fact that contribution from the Harmonic part H is zero, in the
limit of surface measure shrinks to zero. Similarly,
lim B = u(b),
0+
the minus sign results from the fact that (2) is anti-symmetric on interchange of u and v.
Therefore, using (2), and using the fact that both u and v are zero on , it follows that
0 = lim {A + B } = v(a) u(b) = G(a, b) G(b, a)
0+
Proof. We note that if we define H(x, x0 ) = G(x, x0 ) G0 (|x x0 |), then H is harmonic in x
in and we therefore obtain
Z
Z
H(x, x0 )
u
H(x, x0 )u(x)dx
dx +
H(x, x0 ) (x) u(x)
0=
n
n
(3)
Using the boundary condition on G, u on and the fact that u = f , we obtain the statement
in the Lemma.
Corollary 8 A harmonic function u in is completely determined in terms of its boundary
data through an integral over , as given in the last Theorem for f = 0.
Remark 4 We already know from the uniqueness theory of Laplaces equation with Dirichlet
data that the expression given in the last theorem is the only solution to the given boundary value
problem. The problem here is to find expression for Greens function G(x, x0 ). This cannot
be done explicitly, except for some simple domains illustrated in the next subsection. In 2-D
(n = 2), G(x, x0 ) is the real part of the log of a conformal mapping function that maps the
domain into a unit disk with x0 corresponding to the origin.
1.1
Half-Space
Consider the Greens function in a half-space domain
H+ = {(x1 , x2 , x3 , ..xn ) : xn > 0}
The construction of Greens function can be done with the method of images as shown below.
We can think of G(x, y) as the Coulomb potential due to a point positive charge at at x = y =
(y1 , y2 , ..yn ) when the plane boundary xn = 0 is maintained at zero potential. We imagine a
negative point charge outside the domain H+ located at y
= (y1 , y2 , ...yn1 , yn ). Note that the
actual positive charge and its image are at the same distance from the boundary xn = 0. Hence,
G(x, y) = G0 (|x y|) G0 (|x y
|)
We can check that at xn = 0,
p
|x y| = (x1 y1 )2 + (x2 y2 )2 + .. + (0 yn )2 = |x y
|
1
1
+
4|x x0 | 4|x x
0 |
In 2-D, it is
|x x0 |
1
log
2
|x x
0 |
Greens function for Sphere in any dimension:
a2 x0
Given a fixed point x0 , we define the reflected point x0 = |x
2 . This point is outside the
0|
sphere and in the same line connecting the origin to x0 . For a point |x| = a, we note that
G(x, x0 ) =
|x x0 |2 = (x x0 ) (x x0 ) = a2 2x x0 + x0 x0
= a2 2
a2 x x0
a4
a2
+
=
|x x0 |2
2
2
|x0 |
|x0 |
|x0 |2
Therefore, since the above calculation shows the ratio of distances to the sphere is |x| = a of
points x0 and x0 is a constant |xa0 | , it follows that
|x0 |
G(x, x0 ) = G0 (|x x0 |) G0
|x x0 |
a
since the two terms exactly cancel out.
When n = 2, we obtain
1
log
G(x, x0 ) =
2
For n = 3,
G(x, x0 ) =
|x x0 |
|x x0 |
a
1
+
4|x x0 | 4|x0 ||x x0 |
6
a r
| x0 |
x*
0
r
x0
a
|x0 |
Lemma 9 The solution to u = 0 for |x| < a in 3-D with u = on |x| = a is given
Z
a2 |x|2
h(y)
dy
u(x) =
3
4a
|y|=a |y x|
If we express x = (r, , ) and y = (a, , ) in spherical coordinates, then the above implies,
Z
Z
a(a2 r2 ) 2
( , )
sin d d
u(r, , ) =
2
2
3/2
4
0
0 (a + r 2ar cos )
where is the angle between vectors x and y. In 2-D, the solution is given by
Z
a2 |x|2
h(y)
u(x) =
dy
2a
|y
x|2
|y|=a
In polar coordinates, this becomes
a2 r 2
u(r, ) =
2
h( )
d
a2 2ar cos( ) + r2
Proof. The lemma follows from expressions for Greens function G(x, y) for n = 3 and n = 2,
once we use Theorem 7 with f = 0. The details are left as an exercise.
Distribution
We have already introduced Greens function in the context of Laplaces equation. With a view
to generalizing this to other PDEs, we introduce the concept of a distribution.
Definition 10 A function C () with compact support, i.e. = 0 outside a bounded
subset of will be called a test function. The set of all such test functions will be denoted by
D(). Note that can be unbounded in this definition.
7
Example: Consider
2
y, (x) = exp 2
|x y|2
y, (x)dx
Rm
So
S(x, t) (x) weakly as t 0+
Example: Recall in the context of Fourier Series discussion the function
KN () = 1 + 2
N
X
sin[(N + 12 )]
sin 2
cos n =
n=1
KN ()()d = 2(0)
D(R)
We can extend this definition to any number of variables. For instance fxj is defined as:
D(Rn )
( , ) = (, ) = (0)
(5 , ) = (5 , ) = (5 , ) = (5)
Example: Consider the Heaviside function H(x):
H(x) = 1, for x > 0, and H(x) = 0 for x < 0
Then, clearly for any test function
(x)dx = (0)
So, H = .
P
Example Consider the complex series n= einx . Recall, in the discussion of Fourier Series,
we had
N
X
KN (x) =
einx
n=N
n=
Therefore,
(x0 ) = (G0 , ) = (G0 , )
It follows that in the sense of distribution,
G0 (|x x0 |) = x0 (x)
Thus, Greens function has an interpretation in terms of distribution.
10