Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
History/Information:
The patient, a 20-year-old male, was a crew member on a construction team building a house when he slipped and
tripped on building materials and fell 30 feet from the roof. The patient hit the ground with a thud and his co-workers
went running to his aid and called emergency medical services (EMS). The patient was moaning and conversing with
one of his buddies who continuously reminded him to be still and not to try and move. EMS arrived on the scene
and found the patient alert and oriented and immediately stabilized his neck with a rigid cervical collar. At the scene,
the patient stated that he could not feel or move either of his legs and that his left hand felt numb and tingly. Initial
history and physical at the scene found that the patient was a normal, healthy young adult male with no previous
health history; respiratory rate and effort adequate, pulses palpable and strong in all four extremities, skin warm and
color normal with brisk capillary refill, left arm painful to slight touch, and fine motor movement adequate (able to
wiggle fingers). Paresthesia and no movement was noted in bilateral lower extremities. His initial vital signs at the
scene were reported to be: HR 92, BP 128/86, RR 28, and SpO, 94%. The diagnosis of suspected spinal cord injury
was made and methylprednisolone loading dose of 30mg/kg was initiated. Report was called to the local hospital
Emergency Department (ED) and the patient was placed on a backboard and transported with no difficulties. Upon
arrival to the hospital, the emergency medicine healthcare provider quickly assessed the patient and determined
that he was hemodynamically stable and that he should be emergently transferred to the regional spinal cord injury
center for specialized medical care.
Learning Objectives:
1. Utilizes the patient history and assessment data to plan, prioritize, individualize and provide care for a person with
a spinal cord injury that develops neurogenic shock (SYNTHESIS).
2. Anticipates diagnostic orders and therapies, including medications, for the patient with neurogenic shock
(COMPREHENSION).
3. Discusses the possible consequences of unrecognized neurogenic shock (COMPREHENSION).
4. Prioritizes the implementation and approach to the nursing care of a patient in neurogenic shock (ANALYSIS).
5. Evaluates the patient's response to interventions and modifies the nursing care as appropriate for the patient in
neurogenic shock (EVALUATION)
3. Describe the lab and diagnostic tests that would be anticipated for a patient admitted
with a spinal cord injury.
Barker, E. (2002). Neuroscience nursing: A spectrum of care (2nd ed.). S1, Louis:
Mosby.
Hickey, J. V. (2003). The clinical practice of neurological and neurosurgical
nursing (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Hodges, R., Garrett, K., Chernecky, C. and Schumacher, L. (2005). Real-world
nursing survival guide: Hemodynamic monitoring. Philadelphia: Saunders.
7. Identify three nursing diagnoses for the patient with spinal cord injury focusing on the
first 24 hours in the ICU.
Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery. (2005). Best
practice: Vital signs, 3(3). Retrieved May 30, 2005 from httpJlwww joannabriggs.
edu.au/best practicel bp8.php
Lewis, S. M., Heitkemper, M. M. and Dirksen, S. R. (2004). Medical-surgical
nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems (6th ed.). S1, Louis:
Mosby.
McGee, S. (2007). Evidence-based
Saunders.
to critical care