Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Statement of cash flows provides information about the cash receipts and cash
payments of an entity. In some cases, it tells more about what is actually happening
in a business than either the balance sheet or income statement.
THE ASSIGNMENT
I.
1. Source and uses of cash
Alpha Corporation
1989 1991
Beta Corporation
1989 1991
Gamma Corporation
1989 1991
2. Was cash flow from operations greater than or less than net income? Explain
in detail the major reasons for the difference between these two figures.
Alpha Corporation
Cash from operations is greater than that from net income. The major
reason for the difference is that cash from operations applies cash basis
while net income applies accrual basis. The difference is caused by noncash items such as:
1989-1991
Depreciation and Restructuring and other unusual item- This reduces the
net income, however it doesnt affect the net cash
Also in 1989-1990
Inventory and Accounts ReceivableThis increases the net cash from
operations in comparison to net income.
And in 1990
Account Payable The decrease in accounts payable account means
that there is payment of debt but this value is not deducted in the
computation of net income.
Beta Corporation
1989 1990
Cash flow from operations was greater than that from net
income.
1991
The major reason for the difference is that cash from operations applies
cash basis while net income applies accrual basis. The difference is caused
by non-cash items such as:
1989 - 1991
Depreciation and amortization - This reduces the net income, however it
doesnt affect the net cash
Decrease in Inventory - The decrease in inventory is not marked in net
income as this value was already accounted in a previous financial year.
But the cash arising out of this transaction was realized only in this financial
year. Hence, it results in an increase in net cash.
Also in 1991
Increase in accounts receivable - As a major part of the net income is
realized as accounts receivable, the net income increases, but cash flow
does not change.
Gamma Corporation
Cash from operations is greater than that from net income. The major
reason for the difference is that cash from operations applies cash basis
while net income applies accrual basis. The difference is caused by noncash items such as:
1989-1991
Depreciation and amortization - This reduces the net income, however it
doesnt affect the net cash.
1990-1991
Increase in restructuring reservethese are accrued expenses to cover
future cost of closing down a portion of a business. These are only
projected cost and do not affect the net cash.
3. Was the firm able to generate enough cash from operations to pay for all of
its capital expenditures?
Alpha Corporation
1989 1991 - Alpha Corporation was not able to generate enough cash from
operations to fund its capital expenditures.
Computation:
Particulars
Net cash from operation
Investment in depreciable assets
Investment in capitalized software
TOTAL
1989
76.5
(303.6)
(59.5)
(286.6)
1990
85.8
(174.4)
(43.1)
(131.7)
1991
120.3
(129.7)
(27.8)
(37.2)
Beta Corporation
1989 1990 - Beta Corporation was able to generate enough cash from
operations to fund its capital expenditures.
1991
Particulars
Net cash from operations
Less: capital expenditures
Total
1989
3, 670
(3,650)
20
1990
7,000
(4600)
2,400
1991
3,919
(6,031)
(2,112)
Gamma Corporation
1989 1991 - The cash from operating income was sufficient to fund the capital
expenditure.
Particulars
Net cash from operations
Less: capital expenditures
Total
1989
1990
1991
1,479,391
1,434,074 1,040,901
(1,223,038) (1,027,625) (737,548)
256,353
406,449
303,353
4. Did the cash flow from operations cover both the capital expenditures and
the firms dividend payment, if any?
Alpha Corporation
1989 1991 - Alpha Corporation was not able to generate enough cash from
operations to fund its capital expenditures and the firms dividend
payment.
Particulars
Net cash from operation
Investment in depreciable assets
Investment in capitalized software
Dividends paid
TOTAL
1989
76.5
(303.6)
(59.5)
(26.0)
(312.6)
1990
85.8
(174.4)
(43.1)
(7.2)
(138.9)
1991
120.3
(129.7)
(27.8)
(37.2)
Beta Corporation
1989 1990
1991
Particulars
Net cash from operations
Less: capital expenditures
Dividend payments
Total
1989
3, 670
(3,650)
--------20
1990
7,000
(4600)
--------2,400
1991
3,919
(6,031)
--------(2,112)
Gamma Corporation
1989 - 1991 - The cash from operating income was sufficient to fund the capital
expenditure and dividend payments.
Particulars
Net cash from operations
Less: capital expenditures
Dividend payments
Total
1989
1990
1991
1,479,391
1,434,074 1,040,901
(1,223,038) (1,027,625) (737,548)
------------------------256,353
406,449
303,353
Gamma Corporation
1989 1991 - The excess cash could be used for funding a portion of payments
of increase of other assets, payments to retire debt or purchase of
treasury shares.
And also in 1991 - The excess cash is used to purchase Kienzle business.
6. If not, what were the sources of cash the firm used to pay for the capital
expenditures and/or dividends?
Alpha Corporation
1989 - Sources of cash the firm used to pay for capital expenditures and/or
dividends are proceeds from long-term debt and short term borrowings.
1990 - Sources of cash the firm used to pay for capital expenditures and/or
dividends are proceeds from discontinued operations, proceeds from
long-term debt and that of sales of depreciable assets.
1991 - Sources of cash the firm used to pay for capital expenditures and/or
dividends are proceeds from disposal of depreciable and other assets.
Beta Corporation
1991 -The capital expenditures were funded bythe proceeds from the issuances
of common stock.
7. Were the working capital (current asset and current liability) accounts other
than cash and cash equivalents primarily sources of cash, or users of cash?
Alpha Corporation
1989
1990-1991
Beta Corporation
1989 1991
Gamma Corporation
1989-1990
1991
Beta Corporation
1989-1990
Gamma Corporation
1989-1990
-The other major items that affected cash flows would be proceeds
from issuance of debt and issuance of treasury shares.
II. TREND
1. Net income
Alpha Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
3. Capital Expenditure
Alpha Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
4. Dividend
Alpha Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
5. Net Borrowing
Alpha Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
Beta Corporation
Gamma Corporation
III.
Alpha Corporation
As we can see, although Alpha Corporation was incurring losses for the
past years; losses are decreasing giving a good indication that the
company can still restore the business. But the fact that the cash
generated from operating activities was not enough to cover its capital
expenditures and that of dividend payments caused them to resort to
borrowings gives us a picture that the company seems to be unhealthy
and is in unstable condition.
Beta Corporation
Beta Corporations net income is increasing and they were able to
generate enough cash from operations to fund their capital expenditures.
In fact, they were able to use the excess cash to settle their obligations.
And in cases where they are short of cash like in the year 1991, the
companys capital expenditures were funded by the proceeds from
issuance of stocks. In addition, their working capital also shows an
increasing trend giving us a picture of a stable and healthy company.
Gamma Corporation
As we can see from the statement of cash flows, the net income is
decreasing every year. Also, the cash flow from operating activities and
working capital of the company isdecreasing; this is a major cause of
concern. The capital expenditure of the company is increasing which is
mainly funded by borrowings. This means that the company is going
through a negative cycle as most of the indicators have a negative trend.
Hence, the company needs to make a plan in future.