Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://neoreviews.aappublications.org/content/7/11/e575
Neoreviews is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication,
it has been published continuously since . Neoreviews is owned, published, and trademarked by
the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
.
Article
development
Advances in Understanding
Cerebral Palsy Syndromes After
Prematurity
Lubov Romantseva, MD,*
Michael E. Msall, MD*
Author Disclosure
Drs Romantseva and
Msall did not disclose
any financial
relationships relevant
to this article.
Objectives
1. List neonatal morbidities that have been associated with the development of cerebral
palsy (CP).
2. Describe the ultrasonographic findings that are suggestive of CP.
3. Compare and contrast the use of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in
detecting lesions associated with CP.
4. Review strategies to adapt the infant neurologic examination to detection of CP.
5. Explain how the International Classification of Functioning can be used to examine risk
and resiliency factors with respect to outcome.
6. Describe the severity of most cases of CP.
Introduction
During the past 25 years, major advances in maternal-fetal medicine, neonatology, and
translational developmental biology have resulted in survival rates exceeding 90% among
infants born at weights between 1,000 and 1,499 g, 80% for infants born at weights
between 751 and 999 g, and 60% for infants born weighing 500 to 750 g. (1) These
birthweight categories approximately reflect appropriate weights for 28 to 32 weeks, 26 to
27 weeks, and 23 to 25 weeks gestation, respectively. Although survival has improved
among these very and extremely preterm infants, prevention of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in early childhood among such high-risk survivors as well as other neonatal
cohorts receiving new technologies remains a major challenge. (2) The most common
early recognized neurodevelopmental impairment is cerebral palsy (CP), and the overall
prevalence of this disorder has not decreased over the past 25 years. However, with recent
discoveries in brain structure and function, immunology, nutrition, early childhood
learning, and developmental plasticity, the future holds promise.
The purpose of this review is to describe risk factors for CP in preterm infants, focusing
predominantly on extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) and very low-birthweight infants,
but also highlighting gaps in the current knowledge of outcomes among moderately
low-birthweight infants. Recent data from multicenter studies emphasize the complex
pathways to the CP syndromes in infants born very and extremely preterm.
We use as a framework the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) model,
which describes a childs health and well-being via four components: 1) body structures,
2) body functions, 3) activities, and 4) participation. (3) We illustrate the ICF model for
children who have diplegic, hemiplegic, triplegic, and quadriplegic CP after prematurity.
We also illustrate the value of early motor milestones, sequential neurodevelopmental
evaluation at key ages, and a classification system at age 2 years to optimize habilitative
strategies in the preschool years. It is critically important to understand causal pathways,
the spectrum of developmental functioning, and family supports to devise prevention
strategies for future vulnerable populations of preterm infants receiving new technologies.
Current epidemiology evidence suggests that approximately 1 in 3 children who have
CP were born at either 28 to 31 weeks or 32 to 36 weeks gestational age.
(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) In the United States, with its currently scarce CP resources, groups
considered at low-risk for neonatal follow-up surveillance contribute a large number of
cases of CP. From a population impact, understanding pathways of the CP syndromes in
*University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Comer Childrens and LaRabida Childrens Hospitals, Section of
Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Kennedy Center, and Institute of Molecular Pediatrics, Chicago Ill.
NeoReviews Vol.7 No.11 November 2006 e575
development
cerebral palsy
Although a multitude of risk factors for CP in the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal course of the preterm baby
have been proposed, this review focuses on several variables shown to be significant predictors of future CP in
multicenter studies. Five risk factors are especially important: 1) parenchymal brain injury (defined as intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH] grade 3 or 4), ventriculomegaly, or cystic periventricular leukomalacia (PVL);
2) postnatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), or
meningitis; 3) chronic lung disease (CLD) (defined as
supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks gestation); 4) severe
retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (stage 4 or 5); and
5) multiple gestation.
Schmidt and colleagues (17) examined parenchymal
brain injury, CLD, and severe ROP in 910 infants who
weighed less than 1,000 g at birth and were enrolled in a
study of prophylactic indomethacin to prevent IVH.
Among survivors to 18 months of age, 1 in 7 had CP and
1 in 4 had cognitive disability. Notably, rates of CP
increased to 36% for those who had parenchymal brain
injury. Additionally, 24% of children who had severe
ROP and 17% of those who had CLD had CP. Among
the children who were free of these three comorbidities,
the rate of death or neurodevelopmental impairment at
18 months was 18%. (This occurred in a setting of
mortality between 1.2% and 3%.) In contrast, the rates of
death or neurodevelopmental disability were 88% if all
three of the comorbidities were present, with a risk of
mortality of approximately 10%. More than threequarters (78%) of the children who had parenchymal
brain injury or severe ROP had neurodevelopmental
disability.
Several recent reports have examined the impact of
infection such as sepsis, meningitis, or NEC on neurodevelopmental outcomes of survivors of very preterm birth.
development
cerebral palsy
development
cerebral palsy
development
result in functional limitations in the future. Early detection of such functionally relevant impairments is critical
because it drives intervention and family supports that
optimize positioning, handling, feeding, and the development of skills in self-mobility, manipulation, and communication. Several different strategies have been investigated to adapt the infant neurologic examination to the
task of early detection of CP.
Some authors have added the assessment of primitive
reflexes and postural responses to the standard neurologic examination, with resultant moderate improvement in sensitivity and specificity for the early detection
of CP. (45)(46) This approach emphasizes persistent
primitive reflexes, especially the asymmetric tonic neck
reflex, tonic labyrinthine supine reflex, and positive support reflex. Zafeiriou and colleagues (47) used seven
specific postural reactions (PRs), in addition to the neurologic examination, as a screening tool for predicting
future CP in a high-risk cohort of neonatal intensive care
unit survivors. They followed 204 preterm and term
infants with serial augmented neurologic examinations
during infancy and subsequently at 3 years of age. At 3
years of age, patients were divided into three groups:
those who had CP, those who had cognitive disability,
and those who had neither problem. Of the children later
diagnosed with CP, 86% had at least five abnormal PRs at
1 month of age compared with no children having more
than four abnormal PRs and 99% having only three
abnormal PRs in the unaffected group. Thus, this
method of augmenting neurologic examination with
assessment of seven specific PRs appears promising and
capable of predicting CP at a very young age. Study
limitations, including small numbers of patients and a
single examiner, require that these results be reconfirmed
by other investigators.
Another strategy makes use of operationally defined
motor milestones and calculates a motor quotient to
predict CP at an early age. (48)(49)(50) For example, a
motor quotient of less than 0.5 at 8 months of age
predicts delayed age of walking (24 months) with a
sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 89%. (41) However,
this method loses its utility in children younger than 6
months of age. This can be attributed to the importance
of a child reaching a CNS level of maturity and myelination equivalent to a 6-month-old child or CNS motor
development progressing to a level that allows observation of trunk control, sitting balance, and hand function.
A third advance in the early detection of CP was
discovered by Ferrari and colleagues, (51) who found
that observing the spontaneous general movements
(GMs) of infants as young as 2 to 4 months of age
cerebral palsy
The ICF framework is a useful tool to attempt to understand factors of risk and resiliency with respect to outcomes. We have chosen four scenarios for the ICF model
(Table 1).
In the ICF model, body structures are anatomic parts
of the body, such as organs and limbs, as well as structures of the nervous, sensory, and musculoskeletal systems. (3) Body functions are the physiologic functions of
body systems, including psychological functions, such as
attending, remembering, and thinking. Activities are
tasks and include learning, communicating, walking,
feeding, dressing, toileting, and playing. Participation
means involvement in community life, such as relationships, child care, and preschool education. The ICF
model also accounts for contextual factors in a childs life,
including environmental and personal factors. Environmental factors, such as policy, social, and physical facilitators and barriers, encompass positive and negative attitudes of others, legal protections, and discriminatory
practices. Personal factors include age, sex, interests, and
sense of self-efficacy.
Much dynamic change in posture and voluntary motor control occurs in the first postnatal year. (52) These
changes include rostral to caudal pattern of myelination;
establishment of visual tracking, reaching, and eye-hand
manipulation; and dynamic mobility underlying rolling,
maintaining sitting position, crawling, pulling to stand,
cruising, and walking. All of these key functional activities are included in the ICF model.
Historically, CP was defined as a disorder of movement and posture due to a lesion or dysfunction in the
developing brain and included a topography of dysfunction based on the number of affected limbs. The topography includes monoplegia (one lower extremity), hemiplegia (one side of body, arm more than leg), diplegia
(bilateral lower extremity involvement), triplegia (combination of diplegia and hemiplegia), and quadriplegia or
tetraplegia (four-limb involvement). In the ICF model,
NeoReviews Vol.7 No.11 November 2006 e579
Personal factors
Quadriplegia, microcephaly,
seizures, recurrent
pneumonias, gastrostomy
tube, tracheostomy
Unable to roll, unable to
maintain sitting balance,
does not say any words,
cannot hold covered cup
Attends infant massage group,
unable to find child care
L porencephalic cyst, R hand
contracture, R hemiplia
30-month-old
1-year-old
18-month-old
2-year-old
cerebral palsy
Table 1.
development
these distinctions reflect challenges in body function. Table 2 illustrates a topography with functional
descriptors that can be combined with the gross
motor function measure, oral motor, and communicative skills in the first 3 postnatal years. (53)
More recently, an expert panel defined CP as a
group of (developmental) disorders of movement
and posture that cause activity limitations and are
attributed to nonprogressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain. (54)
The motor disorders of CP often are accompanied
by disturbances of sensation, cognition, communication, perception, or behavior or by a seizure disorder. The expert panel also included anatomic and
radiologic findings as well as considerations of causation and timing as key components of the classification system. Thus, the stage has been set for a
more detailed understanding of pathways involved
in the syndromes of CP.
development
cerebral palsy
development
cerebral palsy
Conclusion
References
development
cerebral palsy
development
cerebral palsy
Development (U.S.), National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke. Prenatal and Perinatal Factors
Associated With Brain Disorders. Bethesda, Md: National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of
Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, United
States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, National Institutes of Health; 1985
44. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy. Multivariate analysis of risk. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:81 86
45. Capute AJ, Palmer FB, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC, Ross A,
Accardo PJ. Primitive reflex profile: a quantitation of primitive
reflexes in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:375383
46. Blasco PA. Primitive reflexes: their contribution to the early
detection of cerebral palsy. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1994;33:388 397
47. Zafeiriou DI, Tsikoulas IG, Kremenopoulos GM, Kontopoulos EE. Using postural reactions as a screening test to identify
high-risk infants for cerebral palsy: a prospective study. Brain Dev.
1998; 20:307311
48. Capute AJ, Shapiro BK. The motor quotient: a method for the
early detection of motor delay. Am J Dis Child. 1985:139:940 942
49. Capute AJ, Blehl RF. Functional developmental evaluation:
prerequisite to habilitation. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1973;20:326
50. Capute AJ, Accardo PJ. The infant neurodevelopmental assessment: a clinical interpretive manual for CAT-CLAMS in the first
two years of life. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1996;26:238 257, 279 306
51. Ferrari F, Cioni G, Einspieler C, et al. Cramped synchronized
general movements in preterm infants as an early marker for cerebral
palsy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:460 467
52. Campbell S. The childs development of functional movement.
In: Physical Therapy for Children. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co;
1994:337
53. Msall ME. The panorama of cerebral palsy after very and
extremely preterm birth: evidence and challenges. Clin Perinatol.
2006;33:269 284
54. Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition
and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child
Neurol. 2005;47:571576
55. Crothers B, Paine RJ. The Natural History of Cerebral Palsy.
London, United Kingdom: MacKeith Press; 1988
56. Campos da Paz A, Burnett SM, Braga LW. Walking prognosis
in cerebral palsy: a 22-year retrospective analysis. Dev Med Child
Neurol. 1994;36:130 134
58. Watt JM, Robertson CM, Grace MG. Early prognosis for
development
cerebral palsy
NeoReviews Quiz
3. Several risk factors during prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal development have been proposed as predictors
of cerebral palsy in preterm infants. Of the following, the highest rate of cerebral palsy among preterm
infants is associated with:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgery.
Parenchymal brain injury.
Sepsis or meningitis.
Severe retinopathy of prematurity.
4. You are examining a preterm infant, whose birthweight was 790 g and estimated gestational age at birth
was 24 weeks, in the follow-up clinic at 4 months of postmenstrual age. The parents inquire about the
probability of the development of cerebral palsy in their child. Of the following, the EARLIEST method for
prediction of cerebral palsy with high sensitivity and specificity is the assessment of:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Motor milestones.
Muscle tone.
Postural responses.
Primitive reflexes.
Spontaneous general movements.
5. Historically, the description of cerebral palsy has included topography based on the number of affected
limbs. Of the following, the most common topography among preterm survivors with cerebral palsy is:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Diplegia.
Hemiplegia.
Monoplegia.
Quadriplegia.
Triplegia.
References
This article cites 63 articles, 17 of which you can access for free
at:
http://neoreviews.aappublications.org/content/7/11/e575#BIBL
Subspecialty Collections
Reprints