Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
A theoretical formulation for the static analysis of arbitrary quadrilateral shaped plates is presented. The
procedure is based on the Galerkin method and uses the natural coordinates to express the geometry of general
plates in a simple form. This approach is easily adaptable for analysis of triangular plates. The method is
programmed and several plate examples are solved to illustrate the accuracy and validity of the method. Deection
and bending moments of trapezoidal, parallelogram, triangular, and sector plates under static loads are obtained
and the results, where possible, are veried with those published elsewhere. # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.
Keywords: Galerkin method; Static analysis; Simply supported plates
1. Introduction
The analysis of arbitrarily shaped thin plates has
been of interest to structural designers over several
decades. Analysis of these plates are strongly dependent on the boundary conditions and geometrical
shape. It is widely recognized that closed form solutions are possible only for a limited set of simple
boundary conditions and geometries [1, 2].
For analysis of arbitrarily shaped plates, several numerical methods such as the nite element, nite dierence and nite strip methods are usually applied [35].
Although the discretization methods provide a general
framework for general plates, it invariably results in
problems which possess a large number of degrees of
freedom. This deciency was overcome by using the
well-known RayleighRitz method [6], which does not
need the mesh generation.
The classical RayleighRitz method has been
deployed by many researchers for static and dynamic
responses of general plates. Bhat used the orthogonal
polynomials to express the bending deection of rec-
* Corresponding author.
0045-7949/98/$see front matter # 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 4 5 - 7 9 4 9 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 7 3 - X
Table 1
Interpolation functions for parabolic boundaries
Nodes
Ni(x, Z)
Corner
Mid-side (5,7)
Mid-side (6,8)
1
4(1 + xix)(1 + ZiZ) i = 1,4
1
2(1 + ZiZ) Zi=31
2
1
2(1 Z )(1 + xix) xi= 31
J12 J21
in which
J11
N
X
xi Ni;x ;
J12
N
X
i1
J21
N
X
and
yi Ni;x ;
i1
xi Ni;Z ;
J22
N
X
i1
yi Ni;Z
i1
3
0
0 5;
b0
0
R 4 0
a0
b0
2. Theory
J12 J22
a0
1
J11;Z J22 J22;x J21
jJj
1
J22;x J11 J11;Z J12 :
jJj
N
X
3
3
xi Ni x; Z;
i1
N
X
yi Ni x; Z
i1
and
@xi @xj
@x2 @y2 @x @y
@xi
@x @y
Et
where H4 is the biharmonic operator, D 121v
2 is the
plate rigidity in which E, t and v are modules of elasticity, plate thickness and Poisson's ratio and w(x, y) is
out-of-plane deection. The bending moments, Mx and
My may be given as
@2 w
@2 w
v 2 ;
Mx D
@x2
@y
@2 w
@2 w
v 2 :
My D
@y2
@x
4
Mx My
Dr2 wx; y:
1v
M
:
D
6a
6b
K
X
i1
K
X
i1
bi fi x; Z;
ai fi x; Z
7a
7b
are unknown coordinates or so called generalized coordinates and K is the number of basic functions. In this
paper two types of basic functions are used to express
M and w. These are basic functions denoted as I and
II. The basic functions I are trigonometric functions
and given by Eq. (8a), while the basic functions II are
polynomial functions and given by Eq. (8b). The advantage of the basic functions II are the ease of dierentiation and integration. The functions are as follows:
fi cos
mpx
npZ
cos
;
2
2
fi 1 x2 1 Z2 xm1 Zn1
8a
8b
Table 2
Deection (a = wD/pa4) at center of parallelogram
f
0
10
20
30
45
60
Galerkin method
FEM [19]
0.01012
0.01009
0.00998
0.00983
0.00954
0.00925
0.01013
0.01009
0.00996
0.00967
0.0096
0.0094
0.01014
0.01012
0.01005
0.00993
0.00949
0.00840
11
and
Z
Fi
1
1
^ Zfi j J j dxdZ:
px;
12
in which
Z1Z1
c1 fj;xx c2 fj;ZZ
Sij
Sij bj Fi
10
j1
Sij aj Qi
13
j1
in which
Qi
K
1X
Hij bj ;
D j1
Z
Hij
fj fi j J j dxdZ:
14
Table 3
Deection and bending moments at center of a trapezoidal plate
c/a
a1
w
a2
Mx
a3
My
a4
Mxy
0.
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.004062
0.004821
0.005466
0.006000
0.006437
0.006787
0.0479
0.0492
0.0498
0.050
0.0498
0.0495
0.0479
0.0551
0.0612
0.0663
0.0706
0.0740
0.00
0.0009
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0031
K
X
i1
1 x2 1 Z
x; Z
bi f
i
K
X
i1
1 x2 1 Z
K
X
i1
3. Numerical studies
B1i ci x; Z
B2i ci x; Z
3.1. General
15
where the rst term in the right hand side of Eq. (15)
is the expansion of M for homogeneous boundary condition M = 0 at all boundaries and the second and
third terms in the right hand side of the equation
express the non-homogenous boundary conditions at
edges Z = 1 and Z = + 1 respectively.
wmax a1
Table 4
Maximum deections and moments along the radial center line of fan shape plate f = 608
wmaxpr40/D
Mrmaxpr20
Mymaxpr20
ri/r0
This study
[20]
This study
[20]
This study
[20]
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.000988
0.000934
0.000502
0.000496
0.000984
0.000927
0.000500
0.000490
0.02511
0.02498
0.02234
0.00790
0.024944
0.024846
0.021236
0.007885
0.02560
0.02366
0.01249
0.00250
0.025060
0.023556
0.012204
0.002438
References
[1] Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of plates
and Shells. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
[2] Ugural AC. Stresses in plates and shells. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1981.
[3] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL. The nite element method.
4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
[4] Hrudey TM, Harbok MM. Singularity nite elements for
plate bending. Journal Engineering Mechanics ASCE.
1986;112(7):66681.
[5] Ly WY, Cheung YK, Tham LG. Spline nite strip analysis of general plates. Journal Engineering Mechanics
ASCE 1986;112(1):4354.