Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
Department of Applied Science, Sharda University, Plot No. 32-34, Knowledge Park-III, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201306, India
c
UGC-DAEF Consortium for Scientic Research, Kolkata Center, III/LB-8 Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700098, India
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 September 2010
Received in revised form 11 September 2011
Available online 9 November 2011
Keywords:
UHMWPE
Gamma irradiation
UVVisible spectroscopy
Optical band gap
Carbon clusters
a b s t r a c t
The UVVisible absorption spectra of virgin and high dose gamma irradiated (up to 2000 kGy) UHMWPE
polymer have been studied by using UVVisible spectrophotometer (JASCO, V-570). The existence of the
peaks, their shifting and broadening as a result of gamma irradiation has been observed. In the present
work the Urbach energy is calculated by using Urbach edge method. Also the direct and indirect energy
band gap in virgin and gamma irradiated UHMWPE polymer has been calculated. The values of indirect
energy band gap have been found to be lower than the corresponding values of direct energy band gap. A
decrease in the optical energy band gap with increasing gamma irradiation has been discussed on the
basis of gamma-irradiation-induced modication in the UHMWPE polymer. The correlation between
optical energy band gap and the number of carbon atoms in a cluster with modied Taucs equation
has been discussed in this polymer. We have also observed the color formation which became more
and more prominent with increasing dose and at the highest dose the fully transparent sample became
completely opaque.
Looking at the trend of the absorption curve this polymer can be used as a very good dosimeter for the
gamma ray irradiation.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The importance of polymers having improved surface and bulk
properties has increased very rapidly during the last few decades
because of their low weight, low cost, easy processability and easy
fabrication of thick and thin samples, etc. UHMWPE (Ultra-highmolecular weight-polyethylene) is one among those having monomer CH2. The applications of UHMWPE lie in the eld of medicine, microelectronics, engineering, chemistry and the food
industry, etc. In fact, UHMWPE has excellent properties of biocompatibility, electrical insulation, high mechanical and chemical
resistance. UHMWPE has special application in the gliding part of
the mobile prosthesis, such as the hip and knee joints and the
hydraulic tubes of different conductive uids. These applications
require high mechanical resistance in order to answer to high
dynamical pressure loads and long-term mechanical performance
[1].
Now a days the irradiation of polymers is one of the important
elds for altering the polymer properties like electrical, optical,
chemical, mechanical, etc. signicantly [24]. The interaction of
2. Experimental details
UHMWPE polymer sheets of thickness 1 mm were brought from
Good Fellow UK (United Kingdom) and were used without any further treatment. The samples, of size (2 1) cm2 each, were irradiated at UGC-DAEF CSR, Kolkata Center by using 1.25 MeV gamma
45
S.K. Raghuvanshi et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 271 (2012) 4447
radiation source of 60Co in the high vacuum (2 106 Torr) radiation chamber (in the form of cylindrical chamber of 14 cm length
and 10 cm diameter with dose rate 4 kGy/h and source strength
74 GBq). One sample was kept as virgin for reference and the other
four samples were exposed so as to achieve the doses of 500, 1000,
1500 and 2000 kGy respectively.
Monte Carlo calculations of absorbed dose in air and UHMWPE
were performed with MCNP5 (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport
Code) software [10]. This software can be used for neutron, photon,
electron, or coupled neutron/photon/electron transport. For photons, the code takes into account the coherent and incoherent scattering, the possibility of uorescent emission after photoelectric
absorption, absorption in pair production with local emission of
annihilation radiation and bremsstrahlung. Results of Monte Carlo
calculations were always given per one emitted particle; here it
was absorbed dose in MeV/g per one emitted photon.
MCNP-4B energy deposition tally-f6 was used for dose calculation in air and UHMWPE with the dimensions (2 1 0.1) cm3
under irradiation with gamma radiation source 60Co. This isotope
emits two gamma rays at 1.332 and 1.173 MeV, respectively. A
PC version of MCNP5 was run on PC AMD Pentium II X4 3 GHz
4 GB computer. Statistical uncertainty less than 5% was used as
output criteria in calculations, which led to tracking more than
108 photons and up to more than 100 min of CPU time for each
simulation. Absorbed doses in the air and UHMWPE were obtained
as 2.7044 E-07 and 3.07229E-07 MeV/g per one emitted photon,
respectively, and their ratio is 0.88.
The UVVisible absorption spectra of virgin and high dose
gamma irradiated UHMWPE polymer have been studied by using
UVVisible spectrophotometer (JASCO, V-570) in the wavelength
range of 190900 nm. All the spectra were recorded by mounting
the samples in the integrating sphere assembly attached with the
spectrophotometer, keeping air as reference.
av
A
l
I0
where l is the sample thickness in cm and A is dened as A log I ,
where I0 and I are the intensity of the incident and transmitted
beams, respectively.
3.2. Urbach energy
The absorption coefcient near the band edge for non-crystalline materials shows an exponential dependence on the photon energy (hm) which follows the Urbach formula [12]
hv
av a0 expEu
0kGy
500kGy
1000kGy
1500kGy
2000kGy
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
d c
-1
ln() (cm )
'a'
'b'
'c'
'd'
'e'
The UVVisible absorption spectra of virgin and gamma irradiated (5002000 kGy) UHMWPE polymer samples are presented in
Fig. 1. The recorded spectra show a shift of absorption edge towards longer wavelength with increasing gamma dose. The broadening of absorption peak with increasing gamma dose is observed
in the spectra (Fig. 1). This behavior is generally interpreted as
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0kGy
500kGy
1000kGy
1500kGy
2000kGy
'a'
'b'
'c'
'd'
'e'
-0.5
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
h (eV)
Fig. 2. The dependence of natural logarithm of a on photon energy (hm) for virgin
and gamma irradiated UHMWPE polymer.
a b
c d e
Table 1
Urbach energy, energy band gap (direct and indirect) and carbon atoms in a cluster in
virgin and gamma irradiated UHMWPE polymer.
0
400
500
600
700
800
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 1. UVVisible spectra of virgin and gamma irradiated UHMWPE polymer.
Gamma-radiation
dose (kGy)
Urbachs
energy (meV)
Carbon atoms
(N) in a cluster
Direct
Indirect
Direct
Indirect
0
500
1000
1500
2000
70.8
38.0
39.1
41.2
51.0
3.21
3.10
2.84
2.74
2.61
3.1
2.87
2.28
2.14
2.06
6
6
6
7
7
6
6
8
9
9
46
S.K. Raghuvanshi et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 271 (2012) 4447
Fig. 3. Color formation in UHMWPE polymer samples. The samples are arranged in the increasing order of doses (0, 5 102, 1 103, 1.5 103 and 2 103 kGy) from left to
right.
10
0kGy
500kGy
1000kGy
1500kGy
2000kGy
'a'
'b'
'c'
'd'
'e'
e d
c
1/2
-1
(cm eV)
1/2
( h)
ahv
Bhv Eg n
hv
'a'
'b'
'c'
'd'
'e'
2.5
3.0
3.5
h (eV)
Fig. 5. Plots for indirect energy band gap (eV) in virgin and gamma irradiated
UHMWPE polymer.
b a
( h) (cm-1 eV)2
0kGy
500kGy
1000kGy
1500kGy
2000kGy
10000
2.0
5000
2bp
Eg
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
h (eV)
Fig. 4. Plots for direct energy band gap (eV) in virgin and gamma irradiated
UHMWPE polymer.
4. Conclusion
In the present study of virgin and gamma irradiated UHMWPE
polymer samples, the values of the optical band gap (Eg), and
Urbach energy (Eu) were calculated using the UVVisible
S.K. Raghuvanshi et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 271 (2012) 4447
47
References
[1] S.C. Scholes, A. Unsworth, A.A. Goldsmith, A frictional study of total hip join
replacement, Phys. Med. Biol. 45 (2000) 3721.
[2] M. Mujahid, D.S. Srivastava, S. Gupta, D.K. Avasthi, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74
(2005) 118.
[3] A.F. Saad, S.T. Awa, R. Yokota, M. Fujii, Radiat. Measu. 40 (2005) 780.
[4] S. Singh, S. Prasher, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 222 (2004) 518.
[5] L. Calcagno, G. Compgnini, G. Foti, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 65 (1992) 413.
[6] R. Mishra, S.P. Tripathy, K.K. Dwivedi, D.T. Khathing, S. Ghosh, M. Muller, D.
Fink, Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 153 (2001) 257.
[7] C.J. Mathai, S. Saravanan, M.R. Anantharaman, S. Venkitachalam, S.
Jayalekshmi, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 35 (2002) 2206.
[8] M.F. Zaki, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 175404175408.
[9] Tanu Sharma, Sanjeev Aggarwal, Shyam Kumar, V.K. Mittal, P.C. Kalsi, V.K.
Manchanda, J. Mater Sci. 42 (2007) 11271130.
[10] Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code Software, vol. I (LA-UR-03-1987), Los
Alamos National Laboratory, USA.
[11] A.M. Abdul-Kader, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2009) 50165020.
[12] F. Urbach, Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 1324.
[13] M.D. Migahed, H.M. Zidan, Curr. Appl. Phys. 6 (2006) 91.
[14] N.F. Mott, E.A. Davies, Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979.
[15] F. Yakaphanoglu, M. Arslam, M. Kucukislamoglu, M. Zengin, Solar Energy 79
(2005) 96.
[16] A.V. Kokate, U.B. Suryavanshi, C.H. Bhosale, Solar Energy 80 (2006) 156.
[17] A.I. Mukolu, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 43 (2005) 359.
[18] J.G. Sole, L.E. Bausa, D. Jaque, Introduction to optical spectroscopy of inorganic
solids, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005.
[19] G. Hirankumar, S. Selvasekarapandian, N. Kuwata, J. Kawamura, T. Hattori, J.
Power Sources 144 (2005) 262.