ARTICLE IN PRESS

Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913

Characterisation of commercial ionomer glasses using magic angle
nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR)
Artemis Stamboulisa, Robert V. Lawb, Robert G. Hilla,*
a

Department of Materials, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, UK
b
Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP, UK
Received 20 February 2003; accepted 10 October 2003

Abstract
Five commercial ionomer glasses (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, G338, G2, and G2SR) used to produce glass (ionomer) polyalkenoate
dental cements were studied. 29Si, 27Al, 31P and 19F magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR) Spectroscopy
was used to characterise the glasses and the resulting spectra compared with previous studies of model glasses. The 29Si NMR
spectra were consistent with Q4(3Al) and Q4(4Al) units being present and agreed with the low non-bridging oxygen contents
calculated from the elemental composition. The 27Al NMR spectra typically exhibited three distinct sites at 45–60, 20 and 0 ppm
which have been attributed to Al(IV), Al(V) and Al(VI) coordinate aluminium. The presence of Al(V) and Al(VI) are consistent with
previous studies of model ionomer glasses. The 31P spectra all exhibited a chemical shift between 8 and 23 ppm with the
exception of the Ketac Molar glass, which exhibited a peak at 2–3 ppm consistent with orthophosphate. The chemical shift of 31P in
the range 8 to 23 ppm indicates a PO4 tetrahedra surrounded by 1–4 Al moieties.
The 19F NMR spectra indicated the presence of Al–F–Ca(n) in the G2 and G338 glasses, Al–F–Sr(n) in the G2SR and Fuji IX
glasses and crystalline CaF2, LaF3, Al–F–Ca(n) in the Ketac Molar glass. The G338 glass with a high non-bridging oxygen content
showed the presence of a F–Ca(n) species. There was also present in all the glasses a peak corresponding to Al–F–Na(n). The
intensity of this peak was approximately proportional to the sodium content.
r 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Glass ionomer; Dental cement; Glass composition; Glass analysis; MAS-NMR

1. Introduction
The composition and structure of fluoro-aluminosilicate glasses used to form glass (ionomer) polyalkenoate cements is critical to the setting reaction. Glass
polyalkenoate cements are formed from reacting aqueous poly(acrylic acid) with a finely powdered fluoroalumino-silicate glass [1]. The glass is attacked by the
acid and there is Si–O–Al bond hydrolysis leading to
the release of metal cations, which are then chelated
by the carboxylate groups and serve to ionically
crosslink the polycarboxylate chains. The number and
type of cations and anions released from the glass
determine the extent of ionic crosslinking of the polysalt
matrix and the properties of the cement. Whilst a great
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-20-7594-6783; fax: +44-20-75843194.
E-mail addresses: r.law@ic.ac.uk (R.V. Law), r.hill@ic.ac.uk
(R.G. Hill).
0142-9612/$ - see front matter r 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.074

deal is known about how glass composition influences
glass polyalkenoate cement properties [2–7] there is very
little information on the structure of this type of glass.
The chemical structure of the glass will exert a strong
influence on subsequent cement formation and the
properties of the resulting cements.
In a recent series of studies, Matsuya et al. [8] and Hill
et al. [9–11] have characterised simple model glasses
based on 2SiO2.Al2O3.CaO.CaF2, 4.5SiO2.3Al2O3.
1.5P2O5.(5 X)CaO.XCaF2,
4.5SiO2.3Al2O3.1.5P2O5.
3SrO.2SrF2, 1.5SiO2.Al2O3.YP2O5. (1 X Z)CaO.
XSrO.0.5CaF2.ZNa2O using 29Si, 31P, 27Al and 19F
MAS-NMR.
Matsuya et al. [8] have investigated simple SiO2–
Al2O3–CaO–CaF2 glasses using 29Si, and 27Al MASNMR. The results have given valuable information on
the coordination states of aluminium and silicon and
their next nearest neighbours. The 29Si NMR spectra
give information about the average number of nonbridging oxygens (NBO) attached to silicon and the

015 0.017 0. Stoke-on Trent ST4 7LQ. Marks Ind. Marks Ind.192 0. UK). Bruker.000 0. Pyrolysis of the glasses in the presence of water to convert the fluorine to HF was carried out and the resulting fluoride ion concentration measured by ion-selective electrode to determine the fluorine content. G2. The XRD pattern of this glass is shown in Fig. All the glasses were found to be completely amorphous by X-ray diffraction (XRD).168 0.126 0.030 0. P. The present paper describes an investigation of five glasses (Fuji IX. 27Al and 19F MAS-NMR. Northants NN18 8AN.055 0.536 0. For the 19F measurements the glass powder was packed in a 4 mm zirconia rotor and the recycle time was 120 s. Estate Corby. 85% H3PO4 for 31P and their chemical shift was adjusted to 0 ppm.061 0 0 0 0 0 0. Glass Supplier Fuji IX GC Corporation 22-23. Experimental 2. with the exception of Ketac Molar glass. 19F studies by Hill et al.038 0. 31P.010 0.098 0.058 0. D-822279 Seefeld. 81. whilst Table 2 gives a chemical analysis of the glasses Table 1 Source of the glasses obtained from X-ray fluorescence measurements to give the Si.01 and 188.106 0.2.77.528 0. Marks Ind. Reference materials for the chemical shift (in ppm) were tetramethylsilane (TMS) for 29Si. Na. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 3908 number of next nearest neighbour aluminium atoms. Results and discussion G2SR CDL St. 1.104 0. 2. 52. Bucks MK16 8JS. 31P MAS-NMR shows the presence of pyrophosphate species and this combined with the data from 27Al spectra indicates the presence of Al–O–PO34 type species. Spinning rates of the samples at the magic angle were 5 kHz for the 29Si. Estate Corby. respectively. Germany Table 2 shows the chemical analysis of the glasses studied in atomic percent.158 0. 2.061 0.060 0. Northants NN18 8AN.129 0. UK Ketac Molar 3M-ESPE Dental AG ESPE Platz.041 0. 27Al and 31P and 19F nuclei at resonance frequencies of 39. The 27Al NMR spectra are again influenced by the next nearest neighbours and the coordination state. and G2SR) used for forming commercially available glass polyalkenoate cements using 29Si. 2. UK G338 CDL St. In phospho-fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses there is evidence for Al–O–P linkages as a result of local charge compensation of Al3+ by P5+. This glass was Table 2 Chemical analysis of the commercial glasses: G2SR.140 0.547 0. The spectra for 19F were referenced to CaF2 taken as 108 ppm relative to the more common standard of CFCl3.29 MHz.131 0. Germany) at a spinning rate of 15 KHz with a recycle time of 1 s.143 0. UK G2 CDL St. and 31P MAS-NMR and 15 kHz for 19F. Ketac Molar. Newport Pagnell. UK 3. MAS-NMR MAS-NMR analyses were conducted on 29Si.104 0. Estate Corby.000 0 0. X-ray powder diffraction X-ray powder diffraction analysis was completed on the glass powders for qualitative purposes.567 0. Strontium may be substituted for calcium with virtually no change in the glass structure. Al–F–Ca(n). Coopers Court.515 0. in calcium fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses and as F–Sr(n). Ketac Molar.056 0. [9–11] have also been extremely valuable and indicate the presence of F as F–Ca(n). Recycle time was 2 s for 29Si and 27Al and 4 s for 31 P in a 7 mm zirconia rotor.15. In addition 27Al spectra were run on a high field (Advance-600. Fuji IX and G338 (values in at%) Glass Al Si P Ca O F Sr La Na Fuji IX G2 G338 G2SR Molar 0.1.011 0. Bruker. yttrium aluminium garnite (YAG) for 27 Al.115 0. A Phillips powder diffractometer (Phillips Xpert diffractometer. The chemical analysis of the glasses was carried out by CERAM Research (Queens Road. Al. Northants NN18 8AN.163 0.021 .007 0. In sodium-containing calcium/strontium fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses. the fluorine is also present as an Al–F–Na(n) species [10]. Phillips Eindhoven NL) was used with Cu Ka X-rays.ARTICLE IN PRESS A.031 0.043 0. Germany). G338. Al–F–Sr(n) in the equivalent strontium glasses [11]. 27Al. using an FTNMR spectrometer (DSX-200. Sr and La content.027 0. G2.3. Stamboulis et al. Materials The sources of the glasses used are given in Table 1.

G2SR. The low chemical shift of the G338 glass would not be expected on the basis of its low NC and high NBO content.83 1. the lowest chemical shift of 47 ppm and indicates a high incidence of Al–O–P bonds. It must be pointed out again that this calculation assumes all the aluminium in the form of Al(IV). The elemental composition of G2 indicates a relatively low number of NBO. Ketac Molar. the surplus charge is defined as the number of charges available after charge balancing the aluminium. respectively. All glasses exhibit a peak at 47–60 ppm. whilst increasing the number of next nearest 3909 Fig. the fluorine forms non-bridging fluorines and the glasses are homogeneous.47 0. All glasses show a broad peak around 90 ppm with the exception of G2 and G338. This point will be discussed further after the 19F spectra are discussed. Increasing the number of NBO moves the peak in a positive direction.26 0.48 3. so the latter is more likely in this case. which is found for all cases apart from G338.02 1. This peak corresponds to Al(IV).87 partially crystalline and the diffraction lines present corresponded to calcium fluoride. (Qm(nAl). there is local charge compensation of Al3+ and P5+ and that fluorine forms non-bridging fluorines. 29Si MAS-NMR of G2. Fuji IX and G338 commercial glasses run with the 200 MHz Bruker instrument are shown in Fig.85 3. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 Fig. 1. The chemical shift observed for Si in a four coordinate state is between 60 and 120 ppm. The chemical shifts observed are what would be expected for Q3(3Al) and Q4(4Al). 2 shows the 29Si MAS-NMR spectra of commercial glasses. The low chemical shift for the G2 glass could indicate a lower number of next nearest neighbour Al or a lower number of NBO attached to the Si.ARTICLE IN PRESS A. which exhibit a slightly more negative chemical shift of about 95 and 99 ppm. the chemical shift is slightly lower than that observed previously for model glasses with lower Al:P ratios [10]. The shift therefore depends on the number of NBO and bridging oxygens (BO) attached to the silicon and the number of next nearest neighbour Al. glasses based on 2SiO2Al2O3CaOCaF2 Al(IV) was found at 60 ppm [9] and in phosphate containing glasses where the molar Al:P ratio was 2:1 at about 50 ppm [10]. Ketac Molar G338 and Fuji IX glasses. XRD pattern of Ketac Molar glass showing the presence of calcium fluoride. G2SR.20 1.41 0. .45 1. as expected. 4. Table 3 also shows the calculated surplus charge per phosphorus. 3. In simple model. Since all the commercial glasses have Al:P ratios o2:1 it would be expected that the Al(IV) peak would be found between 50 and 60 ppm. neighbour aluminium atoms moves the peak in a negative direction. 2. The chemical shift indicates the environment around the Si atoms in the glass. however. In this calculation. When a structural unit of the alumino-silicate glass network is expressed as Si(OSi)m n(OAl )n(O )4 m. the chemical shift increases with decreasing m or increasing n [13].63 2. 4XmXnX0). Fig. This glass which has the lowest Al:P ratio has. The low calculated NC value of the Ketac Molar glass would facilitate amorphous phase separation (APS) and subsequent crystallisation to fluorite (CaF2). Stamboulis et al.36 3. Table 3 Calculated NCs and surplus charge per phosphorus Glass NC Surplus charge/P Al:(Si+P) Fuji IX G2 G338 G2SR Ketac Molar 3.98 0. but closer to 60 ppm.52 3. The network connectivity (NC) of the glasses was calculated according to Ray [12] assuming the aluminium is Al(IV). which is the dominant species present except in Ketac Molar glass and G338. 27 Al MAS-NMR spectra The 27Al MAS-NMR spectra of G2.59 0.

High field 27 Al MAS-NMR spectra.02. [14] have proposed the presence of Al(IV). / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 Fig.0 and sufficient P and network balancing cations to charge balance the chargedeficient AlO4 tetrahedron. This phenomenon is most marked with the Ketac Molar spectrum that shows a markedly reduced proportion of Al(V) and Al(VI). however. In order to investigate this effect. 20 and 0 ppm. The G2SR and G338 glasses break Lowenstein’s rules in that the Al:(Si+P) is greater than 1.ARTICLE IN PRESS 3910 A. the higher coordination states are associated with the formation of aluminium fluorine species of the type Al– F–Ca/Sr/Na(n) species. Al(V) and Al(VI). G2SR shows a peak that corresponds to the Al(VI) at around 5 ppm a little bit more negative compared to Ketac Molar glass (ca. this ratio is 1. It is worth noticing that G2 as well as Fuji IX glass exhibit a quite unsymmetrical and broad peak that suggests the presence of small amounts of Al(V) and Al(VI) in these glasses. Al(V) and A(VI) in a fluoroalumino-silicate glass with AlF5 and AlF6 species present with chemical shifts of 60. that the Al would be present as Fig. Three distinct resonances are now observed at 50–60 ppm. it cannot be ruled out at this stage that these peaks are not due to asymmetric four coordinate AlO3F-type units. 4. [15] have also found evidence of Al(V) and Al(VI) in fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses. samples were also run using a 600 MHz spectrometer. at about 20 ppm and 0 to 5 ppm corresponding to Al(IV). Low-field 27Al MAS-NMR spectra of G2. studies on model glasses [9–11] with high fluorine contents that also meet Lowenstein’s conditions also show Al in apparent coordination states greater than four. Stamboulis et al.and AlO4F2-type species combined with a strong second-order quadrupolar effect. it might be expected. Namely. 3. The 27Al spectra obtained are shown in Fig. which would effectively remove charge balancing calcium cations from the glass and force Al into higher coordination states. during quenching. The peak half-width reduced as a result of the higher field. the G338 and G2SR glasses contain significant amounts of Al(VI). it is unclear why fluorine being in close proximity to aluminium should force it into higher coordination states. therefore. respectively. The high proportion of Al(VI) in the Ketac Molar glass may occur as a result of APS and crystallisation of the glass to fluorite. Whilst previous studies [9] have attributed chemical shifts at 20 and 0 ppm to Al(V) and Al(VI). The strong peak at 0 ppm in the Ketac Molar glass apparently indicates that there is more Al(VI) than Al(IV) present. Whilst all the glasses have Al(V) and Al(VI) present the amount is generally small. 4. Stebbins et al. an Al:(Si+P) ratio p1. the presence of Al(V) and A(VI) is surprising. However. Kohn et al. This suggests that a large part of the signal at about 20 and 5 ppm attributed to Al(V) and Al(VI) previously is due to AlO4F. that there is insufficient fluorine present in these glasses for the observed peaks at 20 and 0 ppm to correspond to AlF5 and AlF6. It must be pointed out. In the G2SR glass. There are additional peaks in the 27Al spectra for most of the glasses. Ketac Molar and Fuji IX commercial glasses. strongly dominated by a secondorder quadrupolar effect due the low magnetic field. These glass compositions with the exception of G2SR and G338 meet the Lowenstein’s two conditions for maintaining Al in a four-fold coordination state [16]. 0 ppm). reducing the quadrupolar line broadening arising from electric field gradients at the nucleus. However.26 and for G338 the ratio is 1. At this point of time. The Al: (Si+P) ratios of the glasses are given in Table 3. Given that much of the fluorine in the Ketac Molar glass is present as crystalline fluorite the Al(VI) in Ketac Molar is unlikely to be present as AlF5/AlF6-type species. Furthermore. G2SR. The peaks corresponding to Al(V) and Al(VI) are also reduced in amplitude for all the glasses and are much more clearly resolved particularly the Al(VI) peak at about 5 ppm. .

19]. This glass was not included. since it is both phase separated and crystalline. 5. Stamboulis et al. 6. it must be pointed out that there is very little sodium present in these glasses and the 19F data discussed later indicates that most of the sodium forms Al–F–Na(n)-type species. 29 ppm) [17] type species in which PO4 is surrounded by four Al.5 G2SR 3 3. The G338 glass has a higher surplus charge to phosphorus ratio. It would be expected that the counter ion for charge balancing NBO on the P(3Al). The chemical shifts for AlPO4 and Ca3(PO4)2 are plotted for comparison. rather than complexing calcium. The G2SR glass has a higher surplus charge to phosphate ratio and consequently there are more cations available. we would expect each PO4 tetrahedron to be surrounded by fewer aluminium atoms and this explains the increased chemical shift of 8 ppm. Ketac Molar and Fuji IX commercial glasses.e. strontium or sodium. i. P(1Al) and P(0Al) would influence the observed chemical shift. the shift is somewhat too negative and more negative than that observed in previous studies of model glasses [10. The calculation is only strictly valid if the chemical shifts observed for 27Al NMR at 20 and 0 ppm are not attributable to Al(V) and Al(VI) and all the fluorine forms non-bridging fluorines. consequently we would expect an even higher chemical shift. Consequently. therefore. however. P(1Al). Fuji IX glass shows a strong broad peak at around 18 ppm. 31P MAS-NMR spectra of G2. but has the highest proportion of Al(VI) present. however. the G338 glass is only just outside Lowenstein’s rules. The observed 31P chemical shift of the orthophosphate ion in calcium fluorapatite is almost identical to that in strontium fluorapatite.11].5 G338 Calculation not valid since F-Ca(n) present Surplus Charge/P Fig. 6 for all the glasses except Ketac Molar. it is possible that this glass has been designed so that all Sr and phosphorus charge balance the aluminium so there are virtually no NBO in the glass structure. P(3Al). This peak could be attributed to phosphorus in a pyrophosphate environment. This may be explained (as will be seen later) by the fact that fluorine complexes .5 -10 -15 Fujii IX -20 -25 G2 -30 AlPO4 -35 Ca3(PO4)2 1 1. It is likely. 31 P MAS-NMR spectra Fig. 3911 5 0 -5 0 0. a PO4 tetrahedron surrounded by four Al. indicating the presence of phosphorus in an Al–PO34 pyrophosphate-type environment similar to that found in our previous studies on model/experimental glasses [10. It has a similar surplus charge to phosphorus ratio so this is expected. However. but probably surrounded by three or more Als. whether sodium or calcium charge balances the NBO on the phosphorus would be likely to have a marked influence. So consequently.5 2 2. G2SR.11]. it is not possible to form Al– PO34 species.5 4 4. The calculated surplus charge per phosphorus is shown in Fig. P(2Al). that the PO4 is present in a combination of states between these two species. since Ca2+ and Sr2+ have similar charge-tosize ratios it would not be expected that substitution of Sr for Ca would influence the observed 31P chemical shift. Looking at the composition of Fuji IX glass. Sodium would be expected to increase the observed 31P chemical shift based on studies of substituting Na2O for CaO in bioactives glasses [18. most of the sodium would be unavailable for charge balancing of any phosphate species. 31P Chemical Shift plotted against the calculated surplus charge/P atom and compared to the theoretical expected chemical shift based on Ca3(PO4)2 and AlPO4 Note the increase in the 31P chemical shift with decreasing surplus charge/P for the G2 Fuji IX and G2SR glasses. The explanation for this will become apparent when the 19F spectra are discussed. However.ARTICLE IN PRESS A. 5. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 P Chemical Shift (ppm) Plot of 31P Chemical Shift Against Calculated Surplus Charge per P 31 an Al(VI) species in both these glasses and the G2SR glass has a significant proportion of Al(VI). However the chemical shift is too low for an AlPO4 (ca. The chemical shift ( 20) for the G2 glass is similar to that for the Fuji IX glass at about 18 ppm. 5 shows the 31P MAS-NMR spectra of the commercial glasses. the chemical shift observed is even more negative than the Fuji IX and G2SR glasses at 23 ppm. orthophosphate ion and P(4Al) refers to AlPO4. The 31P chemical shift would be expected to decrease in the order P(0Al). Consequently. In contrast. P(2Al). P(4Al) where P(0Al) refers to an Fig. since there are insufficient surplus cations to charge balance the –PO34 ion. However.

There is also a strong additional peak at 185 ppm due to Al–F–Na(n) which is very pronounced and is presumably due to the high sodium content of this glass. symmetrical compared to Fuji IX glass. Ketac Molar glass exhibits a peak at around 2 ppm. The MAS-NMR data indicate that no significant phase separation had occurred with this batch of the G338 glass. however. which would correspond to F–Ca(n) is absent.11]. The spectrum of Fuji IX glass has only one broad peak at around 150 ppm. and as a consequence the calculated NC values will be too low and the calculated surplus charge per phosphorus figures will be too high. in G2 there is no indication of F in an F–Ca environment since the peak at 80 to 110 ppm. has a higher NBO content and exhibits a peak at between 40 and 80 ppm due to F–Ca(n) as well as a peak at 148 ppm due to Al–F–Ca(n). According to Stebbins and Zeng [23] a peak at about 220 ppm corresponds to F–Na(n) sites in silicate glasses. Stamboulis et al. Ketac Molar and Fuji IX and G338 commercial glasses. however. Previous studies of the G338 glass have suggested that this glass has undergone APS during quenching from the melt. there are plenty of cations present for charge balancing the PO34 group. There is also a weak peak at about 180 ppm that again probably corresponds to Al–F–Na(n) type species. The previous XRD analysis of this glass detected peaks that approximately match to crystalline CaF2. Wasson and Nicholson [20] concluded from ion release data that this glass had separated into two cocontinuous phases. 19F MAS-NMR spectra of G2. as a consequence. there may be . since in these three glasses there are just sufficient metal cations to charge balance the Al and maintain it in Al(IV) state. As expected the first peak is around 150 ppm and corresponds to F in an Al–F–Ca(n) environment.26]. has a chemical shift at about 180 ppm. The absence of peaks corresponding to F–Sr(n) and F–Ca(n) below 108 ppm in G2. These facts together indicate that the peak at 108 ppm is probably due to crystalline CaF2. which is more Fig. Ketac Molar glass has a completely different behaviour. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 3912 calcium thereby reducing the availability of calcium for forming NBO and resulting in less cations available for charge balancing phosphate groups. respectively. The spectrum exhibits the three typical broad peaks at around 70 ppm that correspond to F–Ca(n) sites. but still very broad and it again can be attributed to fluorine in Al–F– Sr(n) environment. 7. there is a competition between Ca and Na for F and it is almost certain that in mixed glasses there is a preference for F–Ca over F–Na. In contrast. A very weak peak at about 25 ppm may also be present that possibly may correspond to very small amounts of LaF3. Model strontium fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses also exhibit a similar peak at 150 ppm [10. Wood and Hill [21] showed this glass to undergo APS and crystallisation to fluorapatite on slow cooling. The second peak. 7. which can be attributed to phosphorus in orthophosphate environment. The peak at 150 ppm probably corresponds to Al–F–Sr(n) species. one phosphorus and calcium rich and the other aluminium and silicon rich. There is also evidence for APS and the presence of cubic crystals from TEM studies of this glass and a related glass [25. similar to the Al–F–Ca(n) species. According to Stebbins [23]. In previous model glasses containing Na. The G338 glass. 6. G2SR that also contains Sr shows a similar peak. 19 F MAS-NMR spectra 19 F MAS-NMR spectra of the glasses are shown in Fig. G2SR and Fuji IX glass is expected on the basis of their chemical composition. G2SR. It is likely then that this peak is shifted slightly by sitting on the tail of the 150 ppm peak and corresponds to Al–F–Na(n).ARTICLE IN PRESS A. G2 has a different spectrum. which strongly agrees with the literature value ( 150 ppm) of Zeng and Stebbins [22]. This may partly explain the low observed chemical shifts observed in the 31P and 29Si spectra for this glass. Youngman and Dejneka [24] found LaF3 to exhibit two peaks at 24 and 19 ppm. However. we have observed a peak at about 185 ppm which Stebbins [23] attributes to Al–F–Na(n). It is also worth noticing that the calculated surplus charge per phosphorus in this glass is very high at over 12. The presence of F–Ca(n) in the G338 glass indicates that calcium is complexing fluorine and species such as ‘‘CaF+’’ rather than Ca2+ may be present. In addition. a relatively sharp 108 ppm peak that corresponds to a CaF2 environment and 150 ppm that is attributed to Al–F–Ca(n) sites. This again may be indicative of this glass having undergone APS and crystallisation.

Lewis BG. 7. [5] De Barra E. The influence of strontium substitution in fluorapatite glasses and glass-ceramics. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements: part II influence of phosphate content.5. [26] Hatton PV. Mortuza MG. Dent Mater J 1998.8. Kroecker SJ. The type of species present is strongly dependent on the chemical composition. [17] Dollase WA. Structural analysis of bioactive glasses. [19] El Gayar I. The commercial glasses have silicon structural units that correspond to Q4(4Al) and Q4(3Al).23:179–83.83:140–9. Stamboulis A. Lippma E. Hill R. Stebbins JF. Structure property relationships in ionomer glasses. Am Mineral 1991.39:92–4. Effects of CaF2 addition on the structure of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glasses.85:1077–82. Merwin LH.19:263–8. Br Polym J 1990. Abiliev A. Boccaccini A. Evidence for five and six coordinated aluminium fluoride complexes in F bearing alumino-silicate glasses. [14] Kohn SC. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements part III.ARTICLE IN PRESS A. Hill RG. . [21] Wood D. Prosser HJ. Stamboulis et al. Influence of fluorite content. J Non-Cryst Solids 1989. J Non-Cryst Solids. Henderson CMB. The distribution of aluminium in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates. Stamboulis A. Structure of Na3 3xAlxPO4. in press.85:863–86.173:275–7. [7] de Barra E. Glass Technol 1988.21:563–9.26:157–65. Lockyer MWG. [20] Wasson EA. Structural studies of calcium aluminosilicate glasses by high resolution solid state 29Si and 27Al magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance.76:31–2. Biomaterials 2000. Hill RG. high resolution 27Al NMR. Am Mineral 1954. submitted for publication. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements part IV. Aluminosilicate glasses for polyelectrolyte cements. [8] Maeda T.30:495–502. Ohta M. [9] Hill R. Hill RG.17: 104–14. J Non-Cryst Solids.29:150–7. Inorganic polymers. Nicholson JW. [13] Engelhardt G. submitted for publication. J Non-Cryst Solids 2000. Characterisation of the ultrastructure of glass-ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement. In glasses with high NC. Hill R. Quantification of five and six coordinated aluminium ions in aluminosilicate and fluoride containing glasses by high field. Clin Mater 1991. Merson SA. [11] Hill R. Brit Dent J 1992. Holland D. Magi M. Influence of alkali metal ions on the fracture properties of glass polyalkenoate cements. [10] Stamboulis A. whilst in the glasses with higher NCs only Al–F– Ca/Sr(n) species are present. Forkel K. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 3907–3913 insufficient charge balancing cations to maintain the Al(IV) state. Brook IM. Law R. Hill RG. Kiczenski TJ. Matsuya S. Law RV. Cation ordering at fluoride sites in silicate glasses: a high resolution 19F NMR study. [4] Griffin S. J Am Ceram Soc 2002. Characterisation of the structure of calcium alumino-silicate and calcium fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses by magic angle nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR). J NonCryst Solids. Characterisation of fluorine content glasses by 19F. References [1] Hill RG. Dejneka MJ. London: Academic Press. the PO4 tetrahedron is probably linked to three or more aluminium atoms. Sebald A. but may also be present Al(V) and Al(VI) states. [15] Stebbins JF. Biomaterials 1998. [23] Stebbins JF. Hill RG. Magic angle spinning NMR of alkali phospho-alumino-silicate glasses. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements: part I influence of aluminium to silicon ratio.21:399–403. [22] Zeng Q. Collins JA.112:111–9.7:301–12. [3] Griffin S. Wishmann FG. 3913 [6] Griffin SG. There is strong evidence for Al–O–P bonds and phosphorus and aluminium locally charge balancing one another in the glass network. 27Al. Zeng Q. J Non-Cryst Solids 2000. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 1980. Some structural aspects of glasses used in ionomer cements.21:693–8. Am Mineral 2000.262:1–5. there is evidence for F–Ca/Sr(n) species. Mortuza MG. [16] Lowenstein W. [25] Ngo H. 29Si and 31P MAS-NMR spectroscopy. x=0 to 0. Wilson AD. Hill RG. A study of the relationship between setting chemistry and properties of modified glass polyalkenoate cements. Crisp S. [18] Dupree R. Biomaterials 1999. Samson A. NMR studies of fluorine in alumino-silicate glasses and glass-ceramics. The aluminium is present as a Al(IV). thus there may be insufficient cations to maintain the Al(IV) state and this may explain the high proportion Al(VI) present in the G338 glass. in preparation. Dupree R. In the glasses with a lower NC and higher NBO content. Conclusions MAS-NMR gives very useful information on the structure of ionomer glasses. Influence of fluorine content. Personal communication. Lee SK.275:1–6. J Solid State Chem 1989. Biomaterials 2000. Biomaterials 2000.20:1579–86. Phys Chem Glasses 1985. 1978. [2] Wilson AD. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the EU DGXII for funding ULTRASET No:G5RD-CT-2001-00475. Assuming 50% of the Ca is present as F– Ca(n) and n=1 the calculated charge available to charge balance Al per Al is 0. Fluoride sites in aluminosilicate glasses: high resolution 19F NMR results. Noftz M. Law RV. [12] Ray NH. [24] Youngman RE.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful