Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 of 4
http://www.gray.com/news/blog/2014/02/24/from-rigid-project-manag...
01/07/2014 18:06
2 of 4
http://www.gray.com/news/blog/2014/02/24/from-rigid-project-manag...
When I presented to senior management I suggested that they put away the stage-gate model and try a different approach based on real
product development programs, ideally one that was relatively short, but important, so we could see results from start to finish. They
selected the Taurus uprate for two reasons:
1. Their key competitors were uprating their equivalent products, and Solar was potentially in the rare situation of getting behind.
2. Sales had promised the uprated version within 16 months, which was faster than any similar program had ever been completed.
Our starting point was value stream mapping. They assembled a cross-functional team of about 25 people, and in 2 days, we
developed a current state picture using their traditional method. We also developed a future state vision that would meet their time
requirements and crafted an action plan.
The current state, as seen in figure 2 above, revealed some serious obstacles to their reduced lead time target:
1. Late involvement: Downstream functions like prototyping, tooling, and manufacturing were involved very late in the process, and
then there was chaotic activity as product launch approached.
2. Batching of work: Engineers would do a lot of work and then release it in one large batch. For example, the entire database for the
machined steel turbine had to be complete before it was released to purchasing so they could order prototype castings.
3. Scope creep: A great deal of rework was done within the development process itself because management or sales routinely
changed the requirements.
The future state map addressed these concerns by front loading the design with simultaneous engineering of the product and process,
providing deadlines for freezing the design requirements, and releasing portions of the design as it was complete to purchasing so they
could order in small batches.
01/07/2014 18:06
3 of 4
http://www.gray.com/news/blog/2014/02/24/from-rigid-project-manag...
Voila! If achieved, the future state would reduce lead time from 24-27 months in the current process down to 15-16 months. The
solutions were obvious. The execution was not.
This is where the human side of change entered in. Senior executives approved the plan and agreed to everything, including freezing
requirements. For execution, we used a Toyota tool called obeya, Japanese for big room. The idea is simple - get representatives from
all key functions, particularly those who did the mapping and began the team building process, to meet every week in a visual planning
room.
Each function has a section of the wall and posts their current status relative to target on financial issues, technical issues, and timing.
Current and potential future gaps between plan and actual are discussed for rapid resolution.
What happened is that the future state map quickly faded away, phase-gate models were barely considered, and the focus was on
execution, identifying current and potential future obstacles, and creatively resolving issues to achieve the future state. The future state
map actually represented what, in Toyota kata, are called target conditions. For example, front loading was not a solution but rather a
desired target condition to be achieved through rigorous planning, trying, checking, and adjusting. The weekly meeting provided a
cadence to the PDCA cycles. What happened between meetings was a lot of hard work to try things, resolve communication issues,
keep sales at bay and senior management from agreeing to scope creep, keep all functions coordinated, and solve unanticipated
challenges such as a three-month delay in a critical component.
The result was on time, on budget, and ultimately, meeting all the technical requirements. As Solar Turbines program manager
Howard Kinkade put it: I have never been more encouraged by an idea or initiative in my 25 years in Engineering.
He was on fire! Fortunately, the success of this and a similarly successful parallel pilot program to develop a new combustion injector
created enough in-house knowledge, skill, and leadership to build on the momentum. Value stream mapping to build a core team that
met weekly in an obeya became standard practice. The company then worked hard to learn problem solving, and eventually learned
about Toyota kata. Meeting program objectives became the norm rather then an unnatural event. And the concepts spread to every
aspect of development including prototyping, on-site installation, and even trouble shooting problems in the field. One of the key
lessons they learned was that the future is never certain and they need to learn through many small experiments, one challenge at a
time. Now, in their seventh year, they are still learning every day.
Dr. Jeffrey Liker is professor of industrial and operations engineering at the University of Michigan and author of The Toyota Way.
He leads Liker Lean Advisors, LLC and his latest book (with Gary Convis) is The Toyota Way to Lean Leadership.
Categories: Opinion
Tags: Manufacturing Plant Construction, Project Management, Lean Manufacturing, Toyota Kata, Value Stream Mapping, Budget
01/07/2014 18:06