Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

An Open Letter

To those who try to use my teaching to teach others:


Tantra can only be taught by the tantric master. It is original God-given power and knowledge.
That knowledge has to be realised and made real in life, usually over many years through
devastating love of God and woman. The right or responsibility to teach the knowledge is earned
and implied in the realisation.
A tantric master is first of all God-realised and inspired by that enormous knowledge. But all Godrealised masters are not tantric masters. That's how rare genuine tantra is.
My tantric teachings are for the individual, for you personally. If you've been helped by them in
your own life they have fulfilled their purpose. You can go on using them to reach a deeper and
more real place within your being. But if you use my tantric teachings in an attempt to teach
others you misuse them and mislead the people.
When you teach something that you have not realised yourself and you build on someone else's
original knowledge, you only give the people a rehash of the truth plus the information of your
unenlightened experience. You might say this is better than nothing. But is it? Do you think the
people are less intelligent or spiritual than you? Why not simply refer your students to the source
that you yourself discovered? And then get on with your own teaching without using me as a
crutch? When my teaching is quoted, embellished or interpreted by another it loses its spiritual
power to transform enduringly.
Spiritually your students are seeking original knowledge. By basing your teaching on another
authority you unwittingly confuse them. This makes you perversely indispensible; you are then
needed to answer the students questions which arise from the confusion you have created in
them!
It is a common practice for unoriginal teachers to combine my teaching with the teachings of
other teachers and so present another confusing mishmash to the people, delaying their
realisation even further. A frequent example is when followers of the master Osho mix his
teaching on love and sex with mine, when the two teachings are utterly different. If Osho or any
other teacher is your master, then you dont need me. A masters teaching should be complete in
itself, as mine is.
Then there is the frequent example of quoting my tantric words at such length that a blatant
breach of copyright occurs. Truth cannot be copyrighted. But truth is original. If you have to quote
someone else's originality then it is not your truth. And you can be in breach of the worlds
copyright laws, and face the consequences thereof, as an ironic price for your unoriginality.
No one is authorised to run groups or teach in my name. No one speaks for me, not even in my
organisation. I have no followers or disciples, no therapists or evangelical priests to misrepresent
my message to the people.
My teaching is always original, so it is always new, and I continue to impart the mystery of my
God-given tantric knowledge to any man or woman who can hear me.