Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

- Mrunal - http://mrunal.org -

[Economy] Barter-Money-Bitcoin: Fungibility, Double


coincidence of wants, division of labour (Part 1)
Posted By On 24/12/2013 @ 9:27 pm In Economy | 105 Comments

1. Prologue
2. Bitcoins overview
3. Barter system
1. #1: Double coincidence of wants
2. #2: Division of Labour
3. #3: Divisibility of Value
4. #4: Fungibility
4. Bitcoin and Fungibility
5. Mock Questions

Prologue
Original plan was to write on Bitcoins. But for Bitcoin related MCQs, group
discussion (GD) and interview questions, one must know the basics of money
itself. Only then you can see how Bitcoin is better or worse than the money we
use today- rupees, dollars or Euros. Hence a long series of articles.
1. In the first few of articles (total 3), well see why did people start using
traditional money (Rupee, dollar), how is it better than bartering system.
And how is bitcoin better or worse, on those parameters?
2. In the second batch of articles, well see evolution of money system: from
commodity money, metallic coins, fiduciary money, gold backed paper
currency, fiat money, bank money etc.-what were their advantages and
limitations. And how is bitcoin better or worse on those parameters.
3. And in the final articles, well see what is bitcoin exactly? from where does it
come? How does it operate? Advantages, limitations, future applications
and regulatory issues etc.

Bitcoins overview
Bitcoin is a digital code. (Some) people use it as currency.
Started in 2009 by Satoshi Nakomoto. He could be a man or a woman or a
group of people- real identity unknown.
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

1/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

There are two ways to get Bitcoins:


#1: Mining

#2: Exchange

Aluminum is hidden inside


bauxite ore in earth.
Similarly, Bitcoins are
hidden in data blocks
designed by Satoshi and If you dont want to mine bitcoins, then simply
find someone who has already mined
spread across the
bitcoins. then
internet.
You can mine Bitcoins by
A. Offer him real money (rupee, dollar,
solving those datablocks
euro) and get bitcoins in return.
using special computer
Websites that facilitate such
softwares.
transactions are called Bitcoin
Reward for solving one
exchanges. OR
data block=25 bitcoins at
B. Sell him some goods/services, and earn
the moment.
Bitcoins in return.
Total number of Bitcoins
in the system =~21
million. Additional bitcoins
cannot be created beyond
that.
Once youve have bitcoins (BTC), you can use them to buy goods/service
(But very few sellers accept bitcoins.)
OR you can just wait for the BTC vs.$ exchange rate to rise then sell your
bitcoins to a third party.
But what about anonymity and terrorist angle? what about money laundering?
what about inflation? isnt this a ponzi/MLM scheme? Well all those things in
detail later on. I gave the overview right now, because for next 5-6 articles, atleast
^this much knowledge of bitcoin topic is required before we start comparing
Bitcoin system with barter system and money system. Now lets start first article.

Barter system
People have been trading with each other even before the advent of money,
coin, cash, currency, rupee, dollar, euro or Yuan.
They simply exchanged goods and services with each other through barter
system- 1 kg rice for a 200 gms tomatoes, 1 kg tomatoes for 50 gm
almonds and so on

Barter system: advantages


http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

2/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

1. Simplest form of exchange. Had all nations did foreign trade on barter
system, there will be no headache of foreign exchange rates and
associated problems. Today if Dollar strengthens by some action of US
federal reserves (=American RBI), then it automatically becomes expensive
for India to import oil from Saudi=>everything else transported through
petrol/diesel becomes expensive= inflation.
2. Less chances of overproduction, hoarding, profiteering etc. =less chances
of inflation. Although itll be wrong to say there will be no inflation in barter
system- because war, famine and natural disasters can create mismatch in
supply and demand even in a barter system => lead to inflation.
3. Difficult to concentrate wealth= Less inequality of income, and all the social
problems associated with it.
4. Barter system ensures need based production. In money system, firms
create products to create demand e.g. so many softdrinks and plastic
bottles+ the subsequent harm to health and environment.
5. Barter system promotes personal contact among individuals, social
harmony, and healthy community life, joint families etc.
But Bartering system had many limitations, thats why people shifted to the
money system. So,
What are the limitations of Barter System?

#1: Double coincidence of wants


I want you to cut my hairs just Amir Khan in Dhoom3. Ill give you 5
kilos of rice
But I already have 200 kilos of rice from previous customers. I dont
barber want rice anymore! Ill cut hairs only if you bring 1 kilo tomatoes as
payment.
farmer

Another case
My son wants to get admission in your coaching class. I can give you
500 beer bottles as fees.
I dont drink at all! Although I do want new table and benches for my
Sir
classroom.
But I dont know any carpenter in this area, and even if I find one,
Mallya there is no guarantee hell accept beer bottles as payment for making
furniture!
Mallya

Thus, under barter system, the wants of two parties must coincide with
each other, otherwise they cannot trade with each other. This increases the
transaction cost as everyone will have to waste time and energy to find
another party with double coincidence of wants.
Money system solves this problem. Farmer can sell his rice for money, use
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

3/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

that money to get a haircut, and barber can use the same payment to buy
tomatoes from another farmer.
Money thus facilitates the exchange of goods and services, lessens the
time and effort required to carry on trade.

What about Bitcoins?


Bitcoin also serves the same purpose but with some caveats
Fiat money

Bitcoins

Fiat money= money issued by the


government (or its central bank) example
Rupee, dollar, Yen, Yuan.

Bitcoins are not issued


by any government.
Bitcoins are unique
pieces of digital codes
that (some) people
accept as digital
currency.

It is legally recognized money for settling


all payments and debts within the
territory.
If you walk with a 5 rupee coin to a teavendor, he must serve tea, irrespective of
your race, religion, color, caste, age or
gender.
If he refuses to serve tea, hell be in legal
trouble.

An IT professional in
Banglore may accept
bitcoin payment for
creating software for
some American
businessman.
But if the same techie
offers to pay house rent
in bitcoins, the landlord
is legally free to refuse
this payment and can
even order him to vacate
the property.

Even better, you can get your rupees


exchanged in a foreign currency and
import any commodity from any part of
the world to India. So a fiat money
(rupee) removes the double coincidence
of wants for the trade within country and
abroad.

Bitcoin removes the


double coincidence of
wants ONLY for the
people who believe in
bitcoin system, and not
for everybody
everywhere.

Lets make comparison table:


http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

4/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

FEATURES
trade can happen without double
coincidence of wants?

BARTER FIAT
BITCOIN
MONEY
Yes, if two
No
Yes
parties agree.

#2: Division of Labour


In the barter system, buying/selling/trade can only happen, when two
parties want each others stuff- the double coincidence of wants e.g.
farmer wants haircut and barber wants rice from that farmer.
But that doesnt always happen, so each household tries to produce all of
its daily requirements- from growing green tea, tomatoes, chilies in their
backyard; raising cows and poultry for milk and eggs; even making pickles,
paper and papad for entire year.
So is this good or bad?
Good from Gandhian principle of self-reliance.
Food inflation is kept in check- because everyone is growing vegetables in
their backyard.
But overall bad because:
Everyone is wasting their time and energy to become jack of all trades,
instead of becoming master of a single trade -medicine, engineering,
construction, accounting, teaching, singing, painting etc.
Thus, a bartering economy is less likely to produce specialists like
Alexander Graham Bell (telephone)=> Vin Serf (Internet)=> Sergey Brin
(Google) because everybody busy growing vegetables in their backyard
and trying to become self-reliant-jack-of-all-trades.
And even if there are talented specialists, they wont have the necessary
capital or resources to continue their research. Imagine how many parties
with Double coincidence of wants youll need, for assembling the parts of
a Large Hadron Collider or a Param Supercomputer.
Money system also facilitates savings to become investment for the
entrepreneurs => more companies, more job, division of labor, optimal
usage of manpower, good for economic growth, R&D and international
trade.
And with the money thus earned, anyone can buy his daily necessities,
doesnt need to grow vegetables or rear cows in the backyard.

What about Bitcoins?


Just like traditional money, Bitcoin also promotes division of labour, but it is
limited by the factor that not everyone accepts Bitcoins- especially the local milkveggie sellers. So if a software professional decides to live only on bitcoin, hell
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

5/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

have to start growing vegetables and wheat in the backyard of his house,
arrange a goat/cow for milk, and so on, we are back to square one- everyone
trying to become jack of all trades like in Barter system.
However, in future, Bitcoin may promote Division of labour to a whole new level
(when and if Bitcoin is accepted by a large population):
Imagine a laptop manufacturing company- owned and operated by an AI
(or robot) that accepts bitcoin payment, robots make and pack the laptops
into parcel, and drones deliver them at your door step.
AI uses these bitcoins for paying the cost of raw material, warehouse rent,
electricity bill etc. to humans (or other AIs).
And whatever bitcoins left (=profit), are reinvested in buying more drones,
bigger servers and so on.
This is not possible in the present money system because legally- an AI or Robot
doesnt meet the KYC norms for opening a bank account = impossible for
them to pay electricity bills through netbanking or creditcard!
Anyways, lets update the table:
Features

barter

fiat money
(Rs./$)

trade can happen without double


coincidence of wants

No

yes

Promotes division of Labour?

No

Yes

Bitcoin
Only if both parties
agree.
Yes, lot
possibilities in
future.

#3: Divisibility of Value

http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

6/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

barter-system-divisibility

Under the barter system


JK
Rowling
chaiwalla

Give me a cup of tea, Ill give you two pages from the latest Harry
Potter book.
I dont want just two pages, I want the whole book for my son!

Even if chai-walla continues serving tea to Ms. Rowling for 300-400 days,
gets all the pages of Harry Potter book and staples them together => still
that stapled book will not sell at the original value of a brand new Harry
potter book (which is say worth 30 kilos of rice).
Meaning:
You cannot always divide the value
You cannot always re-unite the divided values.
Other scenarios:
1. Jeweler wants a matchstick box. But its not possible to divide gold to such
a micro-micro-micro quantity where gold becomes proportional to the value
of a matchbox.
2. Mallya wants to buy a pencil box for his son, offers 1 table-spoon of liquor
for 1 pencil box but stationary-walla will not accept because such low
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

7/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

quantity of alcohol cannot give the kick.


3. To pay for a cup of tea, Picasso cannot cutout 1 mm2 of canvass from his
original painting.
Fiat Money system (and Bitcoins) dont suffer from this problem of divisibility,
and hence facilitate the trade.
currency
Rupee (Rs.)

smallest unit
1 paisa=0.01 Rupee (that is 10-2)

Bitcoin (BTC) 1 Satoshi= 0.00000001 Bitcoin. (that is 10-8)


You can see it is possible to divide 1 BTC into so many small parts, so even
if new bitcoins are not created, it can continue as mode of payment by
lowering the corresponding values of commodities.
e.g. if today MRP of 1 laptop =1 bitcoin then in 2050, MRP of 1 laptop may
adjust itself to 0.00165 Bitcoins, if there is shortage of bitcoins.
And still you can pay 0.00165 BTC to someone by simply typing that
specific amount in your keyboard. Same thing is not possible with rupee or
dollars because of the chillar shortage in real life.

#4: Fungibility
Even if items are divisible, their fungibility is a problem under barter system.
Fungible items = those items whose individual units have same uniform value and
mutually exchangeable, inter-changeable. For example:
1. The value of first five pages of harry potter book= Not same as the value of
last five pages of the same book. Because in the last pages you get the
climax so theyre more precious= not fungible.
2. Value of one diamond of 100 carat = not equal to ten smaller diamonds of
10 carat each. In this case, bigger the size, more precious. Even those 10
carat diamonds are not mutually interchangeable because their individual
value may vary depending on cut,color and clarity.= not fungible.
3. If Picassos painting was cut into nine equal square parts, then Central
Square will be more precious than others. So you cannot interchange
them. And if you glue these torn parts together= its total value will be far
less than the original painting=not fungible.
4. Exception: Precious metal. Value of 1 kilo gold bar= Value of 100 gold
coins of 10 grams each. You can melt to reunite them, you can melt again
to divide them. And those 100 gold coins will be interchangeable because
their individual value will be same.= fungible.
But by and large, goods are not fungible and this creates obstacle in barter
trade, when two commodities are not available in their standard weight/size. For
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

8/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

example, Suppose the ongoing barter rate is 5 kilo salt = one live hen weighing
500gms.
A poultry farm owner wants to buy 2.5 kilo salt. He gives the whole live hen
to shopkeeper.
Common sense suggest that shopkeeper should give 2.5 kilo salt and cut
half of the hen and return it.
But which half? In non-veg cooking, the legs of chicken are considered
more valuable than its head and neck upper part. = dispute between
customer and shopkeeper.
Overall, the customers in a barter-trade will end up buying more than what
they really need. (e.g. 5 kilo salt even if he needs only 2.5 kilo.)=
considerable wastage and sub-optimal use of resources.
Money system solves this via fungibility.
Rs.1000 note= can be exchanged for 20 notes of Rs.50 each. And each of
those 50 rupee notes have equal purchasing power. A 50 rupee note in
your pocket will buy as many ballpens, as the 50 rupee note in my pocket.
(as long as ballpens are of same brand-model.)
Similarly ten notes of Rs.100 can be exchange for a single note of Rs.1000
and so on.
But there is an exception: Someone might offer 1000 rupees for a single 10
rupee note that has unique serial number like ABCD-123456789. but
ignoring such exception, currency notes are fungible.
So, if you give Rs.100 note to shopkeeper to purchase a ten rupee worth
ballpen=> hell give you 10 rupee pen + one note of 50 Rs. + four notes of
10Rs.
Still Money system too has limitations:
You cannot pay Rs.149.75 through notes and coins because 25 paisa is
out of circulation. (Although possible if you pay via credit card, debit card
or internet banking)
Persistent shortage of chillar coins. And if you cut a ten rupee note into ten
parts using a scissors, itll not become ten 1Rs. notes.
Persistent looting by Shopping malls. Items priced @Rs.99, 499 or 999
often, cashier wont give you one rupee coin back but instead gives a
chocolate. (He is making additional profit because for him cost price of 1
chocolate is less than 1 rupee.)

Bitcoin and Fungibility


Bitcoins (BTC) are fungible because
1. Individual units are identical. 1 BTC in Rajas Digital wallet will buy same
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

9/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

amount of goods & services as 1 BTC from Kalmadis digital wallet. (Even if
their unique digital codes are different.)
2. Mutual substitution possible. it doesnt increase or decrease the value. e.g.
100 centibitcoins (cBTC)= 1 bitcoin (BTC).
As such chillar/change problem doesnt arise in Bitcoin because you can pay
exact amount to the seller. E.g. if a pen valued at 0.4 BTC. you can type 0.4 in
keyboard and eletronically transfer that amount to seller. Its not like you have to
give him 1 Bitcoin(BTC) and he gives 1 pen + 0.6 BTC in return. This is a digital
transaction after all.
But there is trouble brewing:
You may have read in newspapers that Bitcoin transactions are anonymous
and hence can be used by terrorists, druglords and tax evaders.
Therefore, some experts have came up with the idea of coin validation.
Well see about that in a separate article later, but for the moment the gist
is:- Through coin validation software, you can separate GOOD BITCOINS
(those earned through honest work) vs BAD BITCOINS (those earned
through hacking & other illegal activities) via analyzing their transaction
history and origin.
This coin validation will destroy the fungibility of bitcoins. How?
Because then most users will refuse to accept bad bitcoins.
Some American users might even refuse to accept bitcoins originating from
people of Cuba, Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Korea or Iran-for the fear that
later US authorities may persecute/harass them while hunting for Bad
Bitcoins/Al-Qaeda/Terrorists.
Anyways lets update the table:
features

barter

trade can happen without


double coincidence of wants

No

Promotes division of Labour


Divisible?
Fungible?

Fiat money
(Rs./$)

Bitcoin

Yes, if both parties


agree.
Yes, but limited
Hardly yes
@the moment.
Yes and less
Not
Yes but limitation
limitations than fiat
always e.g. Rs.14.199
money
Not
Yes
Yes, for now.
always
Yes

In the next article, well see more on Barter vs Money vs Bitcoin, with reference
to storing wealth, account keeping, deferred payment, circular flow of income
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

10/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

etc. parameters. click me

Mock Questions
Assertion reasoning instructions: Each of the following questions contain a
set of Assertion (A) and Reasoning (R) statements. Answer codes are as
following
A.
B.
C.
D.

Both A and R correct and R is the correct explanation for A


Both A and R correct but R is not the correct explanation for A
A is correct but R is wrong
A is wrong but R is correct

Questions:
1. (A) Money brings down the cost of transaction in trade, compared to barter
system. (R) Money promotes division of labour.
2. (A) A trader is free to refuse payment in Bitcoins. (R) Bitcoin is not a fiat
currency.
3. (A) A Barter economy is less likely to have to food inflation. (R) In Barter
system, trade can happen without double coincidence of wants.
MCQs
4. Correct Statement(s) about Bitcoins?
a. It is a digital fiat currency without fungibility.
b. It is not a fiat currency but has all the properties of a fiat currency.
c. Both A and B
d. Neither A nor B.
5. Find Incorrect Statement(s)
a. One fiat currency can be exchanged with other fiat currency.
b. Bitcoin cannot exchanged with fiat currency.
c. Both A and B
d. Neither A nor B
6. Correct set of fungible pairs?
a. One i-phone of 64 GB capacity vs Four Nexus phones of 16GB
capacity each
b. 1 Bitcoin vs 108 Satoshis
c. 1 Rupee vs 100 cents
d. None of Above
Q7. Which of the following statement(s) is/are incorrect?
1. Bitcoin algorithm is designed to generate 21 million coins every year.
2. There are two types of Bitcoins: mined bitcoins and exchanged bitcoins,
theyre not fungible among themselves.
http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

11/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

3. Smallest unit of Bitcoin is called Satoshi.


Choice
A.
B.
C.
D.

Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
All of them.

Q8. Which of the following is/are the benefit(s) of barter system over
money system?
1. Trade is possible without double coincidence of wants.
2. It promotes division of labour
3. Bartered commodities are always fungible.
Choice
A.
B.
C.
D.

Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
None of Them.

Q9. If a Barter economy is transformed into Money economy, what will be


the consequences?
1. Increased Economic Efficiency
2. Increased Transaction costs
3. Increased specialization among workers
Choice
A.
B.
C.
D.

Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
All of them

For more on Economy, visit Mrunal.org/Economy

Article printed from Mrunal: http://mrunal.org


URL to article: http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoinfungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html

http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

12/13

11/13/2014

Mrunal Bitcoins Explained: Fungibility, Double Coincidence of Wants

Copyright 2014 Mrunal. All rights reserved.

http://mrunal.org/2013/12/economy-barter-money-bitcoin-fungibility-double-coincidence-of-wants-division-of-labour-part-1.html/print/

13/13

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen