Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2, April 1999
549
coefficient of elongation
D = conductor sag
D, = ruling span sag
= modulus of elasticity
L = conductor length
RS = "local" ruling span
S, = ruling span length
S, = suspension span length
To = initial conductor temperature
= conductor temperature
w = weight of conductor per unit length
A. The basics.
The well known parabolic and hyperbolic equations defining
the relationship between span, sag, and tension apply to
single level dead-end spans. For a series of spans of unequal
length and nearly level elevations, a simple method is needed
to determine a theoretical level span length for which the sag
and tension characteristics can be applied to determine the
sag and tension behaviour of all spans. The solution of this
problem was published in 1924 by E.S. Thayer, an electrical
engineer in Seattle [11. The solution is now called the Ruling
Span method.
A common definition of ruling span is a level dead-end span
that gives the same change in tension from changes in
loading, creep, and/or temperature as that in a series of
suspension spans between two dead-end structures [2]. This
span "rules" the conductor's sag and tension behaviour for
the line section. The ruling span method permits correct
sagging of conductors and provides prediction of conductor
behaviour with creep, loads and temperatures within the
usual operating ranges of 5oOC to 7OOC.
The tension variations due to load or temperature changes
550
will depend on the lengths of the spans in the section, and the
section as a whole will react to load and temperature changes
in the same way as a single "ruling" span [3]. It is a fictitious
span with a rate of slack equal to the average rate of slack of
the line section.
The equation for the ruling span length (S,) of a line section
of (Si>suspension spans is:
equation.
C. The accuracy.
=D,
(3)
B. The assumDtions.
The ruling span method is called an approximate method
because of a number of unwritten assumptions made such as:
span lengths are large compared to the difference in
elevation of supports.
the load per unit length is equal for all suspension spans in
the line section.
conductor temperature is the same along the line section.
the suspension points between adjacent spans are free to
move longitudinally without restraint. This is the fundamental
assumption of the traditional ruling span method. When
circumstances prevent or unduly restrict this free movement
and tension equalization, sag predictions based on the ruling
span method may be inaccurate.
Other errors resulting from the ruling span approach may be
caused by:
angle suspension insulators, running angle insulators and
inverted "V" strings are neither true strain points (allowing no
551
(S)can be calculated
(4)
---
Lo
As
+a (T-To)
f
i
This cubic equation in H describes the approximate tensiontemperature relationship for a single dead-end span. If H, and
552
actual sag is larger than the sag calculated using the ruling
span method) depends on the span's length, the tension
differences in adjacent spans, and insulator string lengths.
Only for the idealized ruling span method, stiffness is
independent of insulator string length. The tensions in the
1150 ft (350.5 m) span are modeled by the ruling span method
to follow those of the lo00 ft (304.8 m) ruling span, but the
restraints of the insulator strings cause the span to behave
more like an 912 ft (278 m) span. The resulting behaviour is
described later in this paper as a "local" ruling span which
differs from the traditional ruling span method.
A. "Local"ruling man.
The concept of a "local" ruling span ( R S ) is to find a deadend span that has the same tension-temperature relationship
as each actual span. In order to define such a local ruling
span, rewrite Eq.7:
If (To,
H,) and (T, H)are known for a particular span, its
"local" ruling span is obtained using this equation. This is a
single-parameter fit to the tension-temperature relationship
to two known points and is only valid to the accuracy to
which the line section can be modeled (e.g. angle structures,
elastic response of structures or uncertainties of elastic
modulus and coefficient of thermal expansion).
Alternatively, if (H,) and (H) are determined by measuring
the conductor tension directly [6] or derived from the
measured sag at two known temperatures, an accurate single
parameter fit can be established between the two fitted
points. In both cases, the "local" ruling span's tensiontemperature behaviour will differ from the actual ruling span
except between and near the two fitted points. If necessary,
this second order deviation can be calculated using a multispan program and fitting "local" ruling spans for each span
of interest. However, it may not be practical to have ruling
spans which vary with temperature and location.
The "local" ruling span length was calculated using Eq.8
for Case 1. The calculation was performed for a temperature
change from To= 10C to T= 100C, and the corresponding
tension change is from &=8440 lb (37.54 kN) to
H=5886 Ib (26.18 kN).
553
C
T=a +bB+-
Si1
VIII. CONCLUSIONS.
1. The traditional equations describing the relationship
between temperature and span length, sag, and tension are
fully valid for dead-end spans only. A multi-span line section
can be analyzed as an equivalent single dead-end "ruling"
span.
2. The traditional ruling span method can be used with
acceptable error margins for lines which are operated below
l@C and have relatively equal and near level spans.
3. When old lines, originally rated for low operating
temperatures, are uprated for operation at higher temperatures,
the magnitude of sag errors should be evaluated using one of
the available computer programs. The main source of errors
is the longitudinalinsulator swing in line sections with unequal
spans.
IX. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
Task Force members would like to thank the following
persons and organizations for their contributions to the
success of this task, namely: D.E.Koonce, C.B. Rawlins,
N.P. Schmidt, W.A. Chisholm; for providing the results of
calculations using the following computer programs:
STRING, Power Technologies Inc.; SAGSEC, Power Line
System Inc.; NIP & TUCK, Linesoft Inc; SPRING, The
Valley Group; SWING, Ontario Hydro; and
RECONSTRUCTION, Dr. L.M. Keselman.
X. REFERENCES
[ 11. E.S. Thayer, "Computing Tensions in Transmission
Lines", "Electrical World", no.2, pp.72-73, 1924.
[2]. C.O.Boyse, N.G. Simpson, "The Problem of Conductor
Sagging on Overhead Transmission Lines", Journal AIEE,
Vol.91,Part 11, pp.219-231, Dec. 1944.
[3]. P.F.Winkelman, "Sag-Tension Computations and Field
Measurements of Bonneville Power Administration", Journal
AIEE, Vo1.78, pp. 1532-1548, February 1960.
[4]. Theodor Vamey, ACSR Graphic Method for SagTension Computations (Book), Aluminum Company of
America, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, 1927.
[5]. W.A. Chisholm, J.S. Barrett, "Ampacity Studies on
49OC-Rated Transmission Line", IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, Vo1.4, no.2, pp. 1476-1485, April 1989.
[6].T.O.Seppa,
"Accurate Ampacity Determination;
Temperature-Sag Model for OperationalReal Time Ratings",
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol.10, No.3,
pp. 1460-1470, July 1995.
554
Appendix I.
tan 8 = H / (wi/2+we),
where:
8 = angle of insulator swing
- 7
a\d
(conductor
'
*.
wi
weight of insulator
I4
Fig. 1. Suspension Insulator Swing
span,
ft
0.3
0.4
650
198.1.
15.6
4.8
16.2
4.9
0.6
0.2
span,
,
ft
m
Sag@lOOC
based on S,
Sag@ 100C
w/deflection
Sag@ 100C
individual span
Sag error
Sp500 ft (152.4 m): @lo0 "C, sae21.12 ft (6.44 m), tension=1328 lb (5.9 kN)
575
430
530
390
600
5 10
3 90
5 80
350
106.7
175.3
131.0
161.5
118.9
182.9
155.5
118.9
176.8
7.3
19.8
11.1
9.1
21.6
16.8
15.6
9.1
20.2
2.2
6.0
3.4
5.1
2.8
6.6
4.8
2.8
6.2
8.6
19.2
11.6
16.8
9.8
20.1
9.9
15.5
19.4
2.6
5.9
3.6
5.1
3.0
6.1
4.7
3.0
5.9
9.4
18.2
12.3
16.2
10.8
19.3
15.4
10.8
18.4
2.9
5.5
3.7
4.9
3.3
5.9
4.7
3.3
5.6
1.2
-0.6
0.6
-0.09
0.66
-1.5
-0.12
0.7
-0.8
0.4
-0.2
0.2
-0.03
0.20
-0.5
-0.04
0.2
-0.2
400
121.9
9.6
2.9
10.5
3.2
11.1
3.4
0.6
0.2
555
Discussion
Therefor. AEP has effectively been adding more than the "1
meter" (3.3 foot) buffer recommended in the paper: 30 cm (1
foot) from elevated temperature creep +30 cm (1 foot) from
room temperaturG creep before sagging + 61 cm (2 foot) AEP
buffer = 1.2 meters (4 feet).
556
557
d=T,-T,
e=H,-H,
f =1/H:-1/H:
p = T2 - T,
q = H , - H , r = 1I H ; - 1I H:
z=er-qf
Then
b = (dr - p f ) I z
c = (ep - q d ) I z
a=T,-bH,-clH~
To provide an example of the accuracy of the local ruling
span fit of Eqn. 8 and the 3-parameter fit of Eqn. 9, they
were applied to the 450 ft. (137.2 m) span of Case 1 in the
paper.
The first tension column provides the actual tensions,
Ha,, in the 450 ft. (137.2 m) span, based on a multi-span
program. The second column of tensions, H,,, is based on the
ruling span method, where the ruling span is 999.93 ft
(304.8 m). The tension error increases significantly with
temperature.
The third column of tensions, H,,, is based on the local
ruling span fit of Eqn. 8. In the papers example
computation of the local ruling span, the spring constant AE
is given as 1.249.9.5.106. which is the aluminum component
alone. The total spring constant, including the steel, is given
by 1.249.9.5.106 + 0.086.27.5.106. Based on H, at 10C and
100C from Table I, the local ruling span for the 450 ft.
(137.2 m) span is 860.88 ft. (262.4 m). In this case, the
local ruling span fit is within 67.5 lb. (300 N) of the
actual values.
558
H,,
1L-J
(W
8440.0
37.541
7999.6
35.582
7600.9
33.809
7240.2
32.204
6913.7
30.752
6617.8
29.436
6349.0
28.240
6104.4
27.152
5881.1
26.159
5676.8
25.250
The last column of tensions, H,,, is based on the 3- [3] Tapani 0. Seppa: Power Transmission Line Monitoring
parameter fit of Eqn. 9, using the 3-point fit method described System. U.S. Patent 5,5 17,864, May 2 1, 1996.
above. Using the values of Ha,, at 10C, 5OoC and 100C Manuscript received February 13, 1998.
from Table I, the resulting values of a, b and c are:
a = 29.07051, b = -0.008712633 and c = 3.879675.109.
In this case, the 3-parameter fit is within 6 lb. (27 N) of the Y. Motlis:
actual values.
The authors would like to thank Mr. Freimark for his
comments regarding buffers. AEPs experience in using
Manuscript received February 23, 1998.
buffers and with the effect of the insulator string length on
sags is consistent with our paper findings and
recommendations. We would like to emphasize that the whole
T. 0. Seppa (The Valley Group Inc., Ridgefield, CT): issue of sags and tensions in significantly inclined spans like
Although a member of the above Task Force, and in complete in high mountains is very different than for level spans and,
agreement with the TF document, I would like to add a therefore, is not addressed in our paper. Buffers are normally
discussion to clarify the concept of the local Ruling Span.
added to predicted sag values to take into account possible
computation
errors and effects that have not already been
The data from tension monitoring systems [l] indicated as
considered
in
the sag calculations. Although creep was not
early as 1992 that in some cases the measured tension
discussed
in
the
paper, it is normally included in both ruling
variation as a function of conductor temperature was not that
span
and
multi-span
analysis, and so a buffer for creep is not
expected from Ruling Span calculations. Report [2] describes
one method of experimental determination of local Ruling usually required. In ACSR conductors, elevated-temperature
Span length which is applied for determining the conductor creep is often less than creep at lower temperatures because
temperature from the measured tension of a line section. The the aluminum stress decreases with temperature. We would
report also points out that there are other factors than the therefore question why a buffer for elevated-temperature
insulator swing, such as line angles, structure response, creep has been specified. A buffer for creep before sagging-in
deadend insulator properties, elevation differences and the is also not required, firstly because the effect can be computed
uncertainty of conductor properties which affect the and secondly, because creep before sagging-in, like prestressing, is actually beneficial in reducing long-term creep
calculation.
and sag. Normally, a 61 cm (2 ft) buffer is adequate. But in
In 1992 we developed the earliest complete multi-span sag cases where is a mixture of short and long spans with short
model, which allowed analysis the effect of all the above insulators and the ruling span method is being used, we have
factors for tension variation within line sections of up to 24 suggested a 1 m (3.3 ft) buffer.
559
560