Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
L. S t e v e n s
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University
of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Material a n d m e t h o d s
Setting expansion.
368
L. Stevens
A I
,.q'
B'
I
-C'
F
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 1.a. Diagram of stainless steel cylindrical rod. Truncated cone used to form wax ring
patterns, 5 mm base used to attach rod to a "V" block so that the truncated cone and that
part of the rod including part of the recess projected horizontally beyond the "V" block, b.
Diagram of profile of the projecting rod with loose-fitting casting in place. The difference
between the mean of lengths A-C and A'-C' and the mean of lengths B-C and B'-C' (of the
4 possible profiles, each length measured 5 times) was taken as the positive discrepancy of a
casting, c. Diagram of profile of the projecting rod with tight-fitting casting in place. The
discrepancy (measured as in b) was termed negative.
grapff Ill,the projecting cone was horizontal and its profile was projected
( x l 0 magnification) to the screen of
the Shadowgraph. The horizontal stage
of the Shadowgraph was movable (in
two directions at right angles corresponding to the cross-hairs on the viewing screen) by 2 micrometers calibrated
in 0.001 mm. The "V" block was positioned on the stage of the Shadowgraph
so that the profile of one side of the rod
"Y" was coincident with the y-axis of
the cross-hairs. The lengths between
the flat surfaces A and C and A ' and C'
(as close as possible to the outside of
the profile but before any rounding was
evident) were measured by movement
of the stage of the Shadowgraph in the
"y" direction. Each length was measured 5 times. The "V" block was then
rotated through a right angle from one
side to the next to produce a second
profile and the lengths between the flat
surfaces A and C and A ' and C' were
measured as before. This procedure
was repeated until the four possible
profiles were measured with respect to
the lengths between A and C and A '
and C'. The mean of all measurements
was calculated and taken as the reference length for the following measurements.
Each casting was seated firmly on the
truncated cone according to the relocating marks and viewed in the Shadowgraph. If loose, a profile as outlined
in Fig. lb was produced. The lengths
between the flat surfaces B and C and
I1flShadowgraph, Nikon, Japan.
EXP %
8.0
EXP %
8.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
5.0
+
I -
I-I
I I
4.0
3.o
2.0
2.0
1.o
!i !
H
D]~
1.o
H E V~
CERAMIGOLD
BEGORAL
CERAVEST
DEGUVEST
Fig. 2. Means and standard deviations of the 5 measurements of setting expansion percentage of the 4 investments under the hydroscopic conditions (H), with a dry liner (D) and with
a wet liner (W).
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
-10
0
-
CT
-10
DT
-20
-20
Results
H
D
W
H
DT D
W
*
*
DT
W
*
*
*
CT
CT
H
B
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
measuring setting expansion significantly (p<0.05) affected each investment. Table 1 contains the results of the
pair-wise comparisons.
A N O V A of the accuracy of casting
results (i.e. discrepancies) showed a
significant effect b e t w e e n castings.
Comparison between means showed
that there was no significant difference
between castings m a d e in Ceravest and
Ceramigold and between castings made
in B e g o R a l and D e g u v e s t ; all other
comparisons were significant (p<0.05).
Discussion
Fig. 3. Means and standard deviations of discrepancies of 3 castings made in each of the 4
investments (CT = Ceravest; C = Ceramigold; B = BegoRal; DT = Deguvest) using a wet
liner.
369
370
L. Stevens
tained in this experiment were excessive relative to the horizontal expansion, which would have affected mould
setting expansion concerned in the production of the castings that were measured for accuracy.
The discrepancies exhibited by the
castings made in each investment indicated that greatest mould expansion
(setting and thermal) was provided by
Ceravest, followed by Ceramigold (not
significantly different), followed by
BegoRal and Deguvest (not significantly different). The discrepancies or
accuracy exhibited by the castings did
not correlate highly (r=0.5, p>0.05)
with the values obtained for setting expansion using a wet liner.
In practice, any of the four investments are used to produce clinically accurate Ni-Cr castings. Since no significant differences existed between set-
References
1. Jones DW, Wilson HJ. Setting and hygroscopic expansion of investments. Br
Dent J 1970: 129: 22-6.
2. Jorgensen KD. Study of the setting expansion of gypsum. Acta Odontol Scand
1963: 21: 227-54.
3. Stevens L. The effect of time between
mixing and heating on the expansion of
phosphate bonded investment. Aust Dent
J 1986: 31: 207-13.
4. Marsaw TA, de Rijk WG, Hesby RA,
Hinman RW, Pelleu Jr GB. Internal volumetric expansion of casting investments. J Prosthet Dent 1984: 52: 361-6.
5. Meiser Jr ET, de Rijk WG, Tesk JA,
Hinman RW, Hesby RA, Pelleu Jr GB.
Internal setting expansion of a dental
casting investment measured with strain
gauges. J Prosthet Dent 1985: 53: 870-3.
6. Junner RE, Stevens L. Anisotropic setting expansion of phosphate bonded investment. Aust Dent J 1986: 31: 434-9.