Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

lawweb.

in

http://www.lawweb.in/2014/01/hindu-married-to-non-hindu-cant-get.html

Hindu married to non-Hindu can't get divorce under Hindu


Marriage Act: Bombay high court
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court has held that a Hindu
married to a non-Hindu in accordance with Hindu rituals
cannot seek divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Accordingly, a bench headed by Justice VK Tahilramani
upheld a family court order which rejected a petition filed
by Niranjani Roshan Rao, a Hindu, seeking divorce from
husbandRoshan Pinto on the ground that he was a
Christian at the time of marriage and was professing the
same religion till today.
As the family court rejected her petition, she moved the
high court, which, on December 24, rejected her appeal
and upheld the lower court order.
"We are of the view that an order passed by the learned
judge of the family court is perfectly legal and calls for no
interference in exercise of appellate jurisdiction," said the
bench while dismissing the appeal.
The appellant had filed the petition in family court seeking a decree of nullity of marriage and alternatively claimed
divorce on the grounds of cruelty. She said, on January 13, 1999, she was married to respondent as per Hindu
rituals. At the time of marriage, she was a Hindu while the respondent was a Christian.
After their marriage, they continued to profess their respective religions. Even at the time of filing of the petition,
they continue to practice and follow their respective religions.
The appellant-wife argued that their marriage was null and void as it was in contravention of essential condition of
valid marriage provided under section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, i.e. both the partners should be Hindus at the
time of marriage.
The family court rejected the petition in exercise of powers under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, as the petition did not
disclose any triable cause of action.
In other words, the family court said the petitioner had no right to file such a petition under the Hindu Marriage
Act and as such cannot seek any relief. Both were not Hindus at the time of marriage and hence do not fulfill the
conditions laid down under the act.
The high court observed that the appellant herself has stated that the respondent was not a Hindu at the time of
marriage or thereafter.
"If this condition is not fulfilled and there was no contravention of provisions under Section 5 of the Hindu
Marriage Act, the family court was right in saying that she had no right to file such a petition", the bench said.
Moreover, provisions of Hindu Marriage Act can be applied in cases when both the spouses were Hindus and their
marriage is performed as per Hindu rites and rituals, the judges said.
It is also an essential condition under the act that at the time of filing a petition for divorce, both the spouses were
Hindus by religion, ruled the bench.

Print Page

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen