Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This work represents the biggest and most involved assignment of the course, and, given that
writing is a process, you will be working on it from now until the end of our semester. You will
have help along the way by getting feedback from your classmates and your professor. The final
product will be a reflection paper consisting of 5-7 pages (1200-1800 words) that can also
include photos, links, music, and artwork (although these do not factor into word count). As its
name indicates, this paper represents the foundation or beginning of your experience in the BILS
Program. The subject is your leadership journeyideas, attitudes, experiences, values, goals
in the past, present, and future. The Cornerstone Paper will serve as a nice complement and even
comparison to the Capstone Paper you will write toward the end of the BILS Program. Although
this is more of a personal narrative and reflection paper and not a research paper, you are
encouraged to use outside sources (in addition to aforementioned photos, music, art), especially
some of the texts you read for class. These must be cited according to APA format.
--Make sure you understand this assignment and fulfill it according to stated requirements and
description. Address most points and questions within the paper, making sure information is
relevant and sufficient.
--Make sure your information is specific. As noted, you are to draw from your own
observations, thinking, and experiences. Give concrete, actual examples. Avoid abstractions
and generalizations. You can also use information from our course readings as well as other
texts that have been significant for you.
--Organize your reflection or story so that it is unified and focused. Use clear transitions to guide
readers between ideas. Make sure it flows and sounds good.
--Write in a professional yet natural voice, one that readers want to hear and follow.
--Be aware of your audience (in this case, our ILS 200 classour beliefs, values, background,
assumptions), and write according to their context, needs, and interests.
--Cite any borrowed information, using proper APA documentation for citations within text and
on References page (References page doesn't count toward required length).
--Avoid distracting spelling and grammar errors to improve credibility.
SCHEDULE OF TASKS:
ON PEER REVIEWS
One of the most important ways in which we in ILS 200 enact our commitment to being a
learning community is by encouraging and supporting one another in very real and practical
ways, including offering thoughtful and thorough feedback to one another on our work. Peer
response groups are one of the best ways to improve your own writing. This is not only because
you will get useful feedback to incorporate into your drafts but also because writing issues can be
easier to notice in someone elses work other than your own. In addition, you can get inspired
when you see how members of your group are approaching and solving writing questions in
ways that you hadnt thought of.
While it can be anxiety-inducing to share what youve written with a group of people whom you
dont know well, recognize that everyone is as nervous as you are. Everyone is apprehensive
about his or her writing being judged. (And it is always good to keep in mind that people are
evaluating the writing and not the person!) Realize that everyone needs help, and maintain a
positive attitude; show others the respect and care you would like shown to you.
Because your contributions are essential, you will receive a grade for giving your peers feedback.
If you follow the instructions and make a good faith effort in responding to peers writing, you
will get full credit for this assignment. Please take this task seriouslyfor your own sake as well
as for the sake of your classmates.
INSTRUCTIONS: You will be randomly assigned to a group of probably 3 writers. You will
review the drafts of the two others in your group by making comments through Crocodoc and in
the Add a Comment box.
Read your peers draft through once before making any comments. Consider jotting down initial
impressions in the Add a Comment box. On the second reading, make comments and
suggestions through Crocodoc, and conclude with a paragraph or so in Add a Comment box in
which you note 2-3 things you thought were successful about the draft and 2-3 things you think
could be improved. You can also elaborate on items youve already noted, or you can make new
comments.
Here are some things you should consider while you read the draft:
--Is title interesting? appropriate?
--Does draft fulfill assignment or does writer get off track somehow?
--Where would you like to see more information or more specific information?
--Where is there unnecessary information?
--Does the organization of the paper make sense? Were transitions smooth? Is there a flow to
paper? If not, how might paper be reorganized?
--Does writer use sources well?
--Is writers voice natural and consistent throughout?
Note: Because everything within this draft is subject to change (and writer should be willing to
put everything on the table, especially in the early drafting process), this is not the place to point
out every spelling and grammatical error. However, if you, the reviewer, feel that there are so
many violations of conventions that they could distract reader, or if you see a repeated error, then
point that out to writer.