Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RESEARCH REPORT
Published by the Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs
Winter 1992
Volume 3, Issue 2
One explanation for these apparent reversals is that discount firms are strategically replacing dated stores with
fewer, but larger units capable of serving much larger trade
areas. An example of this strategy in action is illustrated by
the dueling Wal-Mart and K mart chains. Nearly one-half of
Illinois discount activity is accounted for by these two
competitors. In recent years, as competition among large
and small discount centers intensified, it has become com-
1
The authors are assistant professor and research associate, Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs. This Rural Research Report
was prepared with funding from Lt. Governor Bob Kustra, Chairman of the Rural Affairs Council. The authors thank Kay Seng Soon for
his assistance in data analysis and Ken Stone of Iowa State University for his comments on a previous draft.
This is the second Rural Research Report on the topic of discount stores in Illinois communities. A previous report (Summer
1991, Vol. 2, Issue 10, by Steven Kline) describes strategies that local merchants and communities can adopt to succeed in a discountstore environment.
2
Discount Merchandiser (June 1991) defines a discount store as a departmentalized retail establishment utilizing many selfservice techniques to sell hard-goods, health and beauty aids, apparel and other soft-goods, and other general merchandise. It typically
operates at uniquely low margins, has a minimum annual volume of $1 million, and has at least 10,000 square feet of total space. By
large discount store, we refer to discount stores with more than 50,000 square feet of total space.
Wal-Mart, in contrast, targeted rural markets from its inception with a down-home merchandising format that appeals
to residents of small-towns. The rural locations have been so
profitable that Wal-Mart is now the nations leading retailer in
sales and profits. Wal-Mart also locates around, or rings,
cities like Chicago and St. Louis and is beginning to enter
urban markets.
Because Wal-Mart has expanded so rapidly and has fo-
stores in other retail categories. This applies to circumstances in which the retail pie was fixed. If the retail pie had
been expanding, it is likely that redirection from local merchants would have been less severe.
Stone developed two rules of thumb regarding the effects of
a discount store on existing businesses in a community with
a fixed retail pie. First, businesses supplying goods and
services other than those sold by Wal-Mart tend to experience higher sales due to the spillover effect of the higher
additional traffic attracted to the community by Wal-Mart.
Second, businesses that sell the same goods as Wal-Mart
tend to experience some reduction in sales after Wal-Mart
opens.
Stone reports that, in general, total retail customers increased at a faster rate in the Wal-Mart communities than in
same-size communities. This is an important finding, since
it suggests that large discount stores improve the competitive position of the retail sector. Stone also reports that even
though Wal-Mart protected the trade market, there was
considerable redirection of sales away from existing merchants. In the average town, total retail sales increased by
approximately $4 million after the opening of Wal-Mart.
Since the typical Wal-Mart store, in his study, had annual
sales of approximately $13 million, approximately $9 million
was redirected from local stores. Of this $9 million, roughly
$6 million represented losses by existing general merchandise stores and $3 million was the net reduction by local
percent loss for communities of the same size. This suggests that neighboring communities feel the competitive
impact of Wal-Mart, without receiving any spillover benefits
from increased traffic.
Stones findings have important implications for rural communities and suggest that research in Illinois might be fruitful.
The current retail environment in many Illinois communities
differs from the Iowa communities at the time of Stones
study. First, generally there is a denser concentration of
towns/cities in downstate Illinois than in Iowa, providing
consumers with more retail outlets from which to choose
within 20 miles of their residence. Second, there has been a
rapid proliferation of discount stores in Illinois putting nearly
all communities within 20 miles of a major discount store. In
contrast, the Iowa communities, at the time of Stones study
were among the first small communities to have a discount
store. These differences imply a more competitive retail
environment in Illinois in which the effects of a discount store
may be less pronounced.
The retail market for building materials changed at approximately the same rate for Wal-Mart communities and samesize communities without a Wal-Mart. This category includes lumber yards which are expected to gain from a
discount store and hardware, paint and glass stores which
generally carry merchandise similar to Wal-Mart.
Stone reports that discount stores negatively impact the
retail trade of neighboring communities. Smaller communities within 20 miles of a Wal-Mart location had average
cumulative losses of 23.5 percent in total retail sales, in the
four years after the Wal-Mart opening compared with a 10.8
Illinois Study
Our study focuses on 15 downstate Illinois communities
(with 1990 populations from 5,000 to 22,000) in which a large
discount store opened in the period 1986-89. Six additional
large discount stores opened in the period, but were not
included in the analysis because they were located either
contiguous to the metropolitan areas of Chicago or St. Louis
or in cities with populations larger than 50,000. The study
took place during an expansionary phase of the business
cycle, and therefore, downturns in retail activity because of
business recessions do not complicate the analysis.
Raw data were obtained from retail sales tax reports of the
Illinois Department of Revenue. Sales taxes were converted
to current dollar retail sales by using the appropriate local
sales tax percentage. Data were collected from 1984 to the
first half of 1991. Comparable sales tax data are not available
prior to 1984. By selecting communities with store openings
between 1986 and 1989, at least two years of data were
available prior to store opening.
General Merchandise
Automotive and filing stations
Eating and drinking places
Apparel
Food
Furniture and household
Lumber and hardware
The decline in furniture and household (similar to the category of household furnishings in Stones study) is severe
and inconsistent with Stones results. Stores in this category
gained customers prior to the discounter, but lost customers
afterwards (Figure 7). This category is broadly defined to
include several types of stores. Furniture stores are expected to gain from spillover effects of large discounters,
The year -2 (two years before opening) is the base year. Changes shown are average cumulative
percentage change since the base year. Year 0 is the year that the discount store opened.
Readers should realize that although the findings are generally true for the Illinois study communities, the specific
impacts of a large discount store depend on the local retail
environment. To better evaluate the impact of a large discount store opening in their town, community leaders should
consider each of these factors.
Local purchasing power. The economic impact of a large
discount store on local merchants depends, in part, on the
demand characteristics of the community. If the population
and per capita income of the community are growing rapidly,
the ability to absorb additional retail activity is also increasing. If population and per capita income are stable or declining, the discount store must pull new customers into town.
Otherwise its trade will be at the expense of existing businesses. The Illinois communities included in this study
generally had stable or declining economies. Ten of the 15
communities lost population between 1980 and 1990 and all
had per capita income growth less than inflation from 1979
to 1987.
Summary
Discount stores are a major force in the retail environment of
small communities. Local government officials, chambers of
commerce, merchants, and others interested in development need information on the effects of discount stores on
local retail trade. This study has shown effects of opening a
large discount store in 15 Illinois communities in the late
1980s.
References
Davies, R. L. and D. S. Rogers. Store Location and Store Assessment Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1984.
Kline, Steven. Competing with Rural Discount Centers, Rural Research Report, Summer, Vol. 2, Issue 10. Macomb, IL: Illinois Institute
for Rural Affairs. 1991.
Rawn, Cynthia Dunn. Wal-Mart vs. Main Street, American Demographics, June, pp. 58-59. 1990.
State of Illinois, Department of Revenue. . Kind of Business 360 Reports: Receipts from County/Municipal Retailers Occupation Tax;
County/Municipal Service Occupation Tax; and County/Municipal Use Tax -- Amounts Collected from State Tax Excluded, Calendar
Year Reports 1984-1991. Springfield, IL: Department of Revenue. 1984-1991.
Stone, Kenneth R. . The Impact of Wal-Mart Stores on Retail Trade Areas in Iowa, unpublished manuscript, Ames, IA, Iowa State
University. 1989.
The True Look. Discount Merchandiser, June, pp. 48-72. 1990.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 1991 Annual Report, Bentonville, AK, Corporate and Public Affairs Division, January 31, pp. 1-20. 1991.
The Rural Research Report is a series published by the Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs to provide brief updates on
research projects conducted by the Institute. Rural Research Reports are peer-reviewed and distributed to
public officials, libraries, and professional associations involved with specific policy issues.
Printed on recycled paper
Nonprofit Organization
U.S. Postage
Paid
Macomb, IL 61455
Permit No. 489