0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
12 Ansichten2 Seiten
Externalities in the presence of externalities the market eq. Is not pareto efficient. Externalities present whenever some economic agent's welfare includes real variables whose values are chosen by others without particular attention to the effect upon the welfare of other agents they affect. When under strict-liability each agent max U w.r.t production and a plays his dominant strategy and B reacts accordingly.
Externalities in the presence of externalities the market eq. Is not pareto efficient. Externalities present whenever some economic agent's welfare includes real variables whose values are chosen by others without particular attention to the effect upon the welfare of other agents they affect. When under strict-liability each agent max U w.r.t production and a plays his dominant strategy and B reacts accordingly.
Externalities in the presence of externalities the market eq. Is not pareto efficient. Externalities present whenever some economic agent's welfare includes real variables whose values are chosen by others without particular attention to the effect upon the welfare of other agents they affect. When under strict-liability each agent max U w.r.t production and a plays his dominant strategy and B reacts accordingly.
In the presence of externalities the market eq. is not pareto efficient
An externality is present whenever some economic agents welfare includes real variables whose values are chosen by others without particular attention to the effect upon the welfare of other agents they affect Or whenever there is insufficient incentive for a potential market to be created for some good
Simple Model
2 agents : A and B , 2 activities x and y
A : U = A(x) and B : V = B(y) S (x,y) x has a harmful effect on Bs utility For efficiency max A subject to the constraint that the U of B V0 : Max : A(x) + ( B(y) S (x,y) - V0 ) and get the following FOCs: Ax(xE )- Sx(xE,yE) = 0 and By( yE )- Sy(xE,yE) = 0 When under no-liability each agent max U w.r.t production and A plays his dominant strategy and B reacts accordingly: FOCs: Ax(xN) = 0 and By(yN) Sy(xN,yN) = 0 Therefore A overproduces and B underproduces in this situation When under strict-liability A must pay for the full externality , and now B plays his dominant strategy FOCs: Ax(xL)- SX(xL,yL) = 0 and By ( yL ) = 0 Therefore A underproduces and B overproduces in this situation
Coase Theorem: Property Rights
B has property rights and therefore A has to pay B to pollute (p)
Note in eq. xs=xD=xE Max Supply : A(x) - pxs Max Demand : B(y) S(x,y) + pXD FOCs: A: Ax ( xS) p = 0 , FOCs: B: By(y) Sy(xD,y) , B: -Sx (xD , y) + p From these we get the following first best solution with property rights: Ax(xE) = Sx(xE,yE) and By(yE) = Sy(xE,yE) However , there is empirically a lack of such market solutions because of the complexity of property rights and high transaction costs and asymmetric information , there is therefore a need for the govt to intervene
Pigovian Taxation
Govt levies a tax (t) on the polluting activity (x)
A:max A(x) tx , B:max B(y)-S(x,y) FOCs: Ax(x) t = 0 and By(y) Sy(x,y) = 0
When the tax is equal to the marginal damage of As production the inefficiency is solved and therefore the tax is Pigovian when : t = Sx(xE,yE)
2 polluters model
C produces z which enters as a negative externality for B
Max : A(x) + ( B(y) S (x,y,z) V0) + ( C(z) W0) FOCS: Ax(xE) - Sx (xE,yE,zE) = 0 By(yE) - Sy(xE,yE,zE) = 0 Cz(zE) - Sz(xE,yE,zE) = 0 tA and tC are Sx (x,y,z) and Sz(x,y,z) respectively If only the aggregate externality ( sum of x and z) matters Bs U fn is : V=B(x) S(y, x+z) Therefore Sx (y,x+z) = Sz(y,x+z) therefore tA = tC