Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
In this work, heat transfer from a moving surface due to series of impinging slot jets under laminar conditions has
been optimized. For this study numerical investigations were carried out initially using Ansys Fluent 14 and these
results were used to train an articial neural network (ANN). This trained network was integrated into Micro-Genetic Algorithm to get the optimum parameters for better heat transfer from the surface, an optimization procedure proposed by Madadi and Balaji. Pitch of the jets (P), height of the jets (H) and the non-dimensional surface
velocity (Vs) were chosen as dependent variables for optimum heat transfer. 99 simulations were performed by
changing above parameters for each Reynolds number, Re of 100 and 200 were used for case study. Imposition of
surface velocity strongly affects the heat transfer magnitude and distribution following a change in ow structure. The performance of Micro-Genetic Algorithm (GA) was also compared with standard Genetic Algorithm
(GA); it shows that GA reaches optimum in less than half the time of standard GA. The optimum results show
that the pitch of the jets, height of the jets and surface velocity should be as low as possible.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Heat transfer from a moving surface due to jet impingement is of
considerable interest due to high heat transfer rates, which makes it applicable for cooling turbine blades, metal processing and many other
cooling and drying applications [18]. In recent years, turbulent heat
transfer studies were reported on effect of moving surface on slot jets
[28], while these studies on heat transfer from moving surface impinged with laminar slot jets were also reported [1].
Chattopadhyay and Saha [1] have investigated heat transfer from slot
jets on a moving surface under laminar conditions. Axial and knife jet
types were considered and have found that axial jets are always preferred over knife jets. Chattopadhyay et al. [2] studied heat transfer
from a moving surface due to impinging slot jets using the large eddy
simulation technique in the range of Reynolds between 500 and 3000.
The surface velocity has been varied from 0 up to twice the jet velocity.
By increasing surface velocity Nu distribution becomes more uniform
and it also reduces heat transfer. Different types of jets namely annular
jet [3] and circular jet [4] were investigated by Chattopadhyay. It was
found that heat transfer from annular jet was about 20% less than that
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.10.023
0735-1933/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
of a circular jet [3]. The surface velocity largely inuences the heat transfer from the moving surface in the case of circular jet [4]. The large Eddy
Simulation technique was extensively used for analyzing heat transfer
from moving surface due to slot jets under turbulent conditions [2,6,8].
Whereas realizable K- model was used effectively by Chattopadhyay
and Benim [4,7] for high Reynolds number.
By combining optimization techniques with Computational Fluid Dynamics, long computer time can be saved compared to extensive search
[911]. Articial Neural Networks (ANNs) were integrated into Genetic
Algorithms (GAs) to obtain more efcient results [9,10]. Micro-GA is an
alternative to standard GA which is adopted to achieve optimum quickly
with population size less than 10 [11]. Madadi and Balaji [9] used a back
propagation ANN as an objective function which was fed to Micro-GA. A
similar approach was employed with standard GA applied to a natural
convection problem by Kadiyala and Chattopadhyay [10]. Lee et al. [12]
have optimized effectiveness of micro-heat exchanger using the standard GA combined with ANN and named as neuro-genetic optimization.
In the present work the computational domain is adopted from [1] as
shown in Fig. 1. Periodic interfaces have been taken on the left and right
sides of the domain so as to consider a series of jets. Pressure outlets were
imposed at the front and back faces for escaping of incoming uid. After
getting sufcient amount of results from CFD simulations an ANN is
trained to integrate with GA to get optimum results. The variables
that are optimized are pitch of the jets (P), height of the jet (H) and horizontal velocity of moving surface in x direction (Vs). Performance of GA
is also compared with standard GA for the present problem.
144
P.K. Kadiyala, H. Chattopadhyay / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 59 (2014) 143147
Nomenclature
B
H
p
P
T
u,v,w
V
Vs
Lx,Ly,Lz
Re
Nu
MRE
n
u v w
0:
x y z
Momentum equations:
Greek symbols
Density, kg/m3
!
2
2
2
u
u
u
p
u u u
w
u v
x
x
x
x
x2 y2 z2
!
v
v
v
p
2 v 2 v 2 v
:
u v w
y
y
y
y
x2 y2 z2
!
2
2
2
w
w
w
p
w w w
u
:
v
w
z
z
z
z
x2
y2
z2
Energy equation:
!
2
2
2
T
T
T
T T T
u
v
w
x
y
z
x2 y2 z2
B
Lz=8B
H = B, 2B & 3B
Ly=10B
P.K. Kadiyala, H. Chattopadhyay / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 59 (2014) 143147
145
Table 1
Validation of initial results with [1].
Re
Vs
Nu (Ref)
Nu
% error
100
0
0.1
0.5
1
2
0
0.1
0.5
1
2
3.74
3.71
3.69
3.29
2.63
5.45
5.39
5.34
4.44
3.42
3.737
3.735
3.703
3.332
2.644
5.506
5.509
5.450
4.656
3.575
0.09
0.68
0.36
1.27
0.54
1.03
2.20
2.06
4.87
4.54
200
time and percentage error, grid with 667,711 nodes was selected. The
adopted grid gave an error of 4.53% compared with grid independent
value. Initially the results for the conguration with P = 8B, H = 2B
were validated with those of Chattopadhyay and Saha [1]. The deviation
was within 25% as shown in Table 1. The trends reporting effect of surface velocity on Nusselt number along the direction of motion are compared with Chattopadhyay and Saha [1], shown in Fig. 2.
Three dimensional governing equations shown above are
discretized on a non-uniform structured grid using the nite volume
method. The velocities and pressures were calculated using semi-implicit pressure linked equation (SIMPLE) scheme [13]. The interpolation
of the gradients of velocities and temperature used the third-order accurate MUSCL scheme [14]. The discretized equations are then linearized using an implicit technique and solved using Ansys Fluent 14, 3d
double precision solver. The convergence criteria for energy equation
and momentum equations are 106 and 104 respectively.
4. Optimization
Optimization was adopted to get best values of pitch of jets (P),
height of jet (H) and moving surface velocity (Vs) for both Reynolds
numbers 100 and 200 by maximizing Nusselt number.
4.1. Articial Neural Networks
Articial Neural Networks (ANNs) are numerical modeling tools that
have found tremendous acceptance in many research areas for modeling real world problems [15]. The ANN used here is a feed forward
back propagation articial neural network. The transfer functions used
are tan-sigmoid transfer function for the rst three layers and pure
linear transfer for the last output layer. The weights and bias values
are updated in the ANN using LevenbergMarquardt algorithm [9,10].
A total of 99 simulations were calculated for both Reynolds numbers
100 and 200. Out of these, 81 were used to train an ANN and the remaining were used to test it. The number of neurons in hidden layers is selected depending on mean relative error (MRE) and correlation
coefcient. ANN of two hidden layers with 5 neurons each is used for
both cases, input layer has three neurons and output layer has one
neuron.
MRE
where
a
t
Fig. 2. Comparison of Nu variation along X with surface velocity of present results with
Chattopadhyay and Saha [1].
n
1X
jai t i j
n i1 jt i j
146
P.K. Kadiyala, H. Chattopadhyay / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 59 (2014) 143147
reported. Symmetric distribution of Nu is observed at all pitches for stationary condition which takes an inclined S-shaped at a surface velocity
of 1.0, a similar trend being reported by Chattopadhyay and Saha [1].
Fig. 4 shows the variation of heat transfer with surface velocity. It can
be observed that as pitch increases, the value of Nu reduces at all levels
of surface velocity. However the change is more prominent for the case
of stationary jet and the difference reduces with increasing surface velocity. At Re = 100, 200 change in pitch from 6B to 10B reduces heat
transfer by 20 and 18% respectively. But the reduction is only 9% for
Vs = 2.
For the jet with height of B, the effect of surface velocity on heat
transfer is almost negligible. Fig. 5 shows the variation of Nu for different jet heights. Height of the jet largely affects the heat transfer with
positive surface velocity, compared to stationary condition. Uniform
heat transfer distribution can be achieved with lesser surface velocity
for H = 3B.
The Nusselt number always decreases with increase in velocity. The
surface velocity effects the ow regime strongly, as it has been observed
that strong asymmetry is discerned with increasing surface velocity. The
ow eld for such cases was previously discussed by Chattopadhyay et
al. [1,2,6]. It has been observed that jet height effects the distribution of
Nusselt number considerably. For H = B more heat is transferred nearer
the impingement zone, whereas it is distributed evenly for higher jet
heights.
From the above observations it is clear that heat transfer depends on
pitch of jets (P), height of the jet (H) and surface velocity (Vs). Data were
generated for different combinations of Re, P, H and Vs. This output is
further used for optimization purpose as described below.
The Micro-Genetic Algorithm (GA) is a small population Genetic Algorithm that operates on same principle as above. Due to small population, the computational time required to achieve best t solution is less.
Maximizing Nusselt number is the objective taken for optimization. The
population size is 5 for each generation. The Nusselt number value will
be generated by the ANN, whenever required by the algorithm. The ow
diagram was given by Madadi and Balaji [9].
By using Micro-GA it has been observed that the result may be obtained in less than half the time taken by standard GA, after 51 generations of population size 5. The optimum congurations for Re equal to
100 and 200 are shown in Table 2. The range of variables taken is
P = 6B10B, H = B3B and Vs = 02. GA reaches global optimum
after 51 generations.
It may be noted here that as the optimization parameter, surface averaged Nu is considered in the work. However, the optimization parameter may be dened by the user and the same strategy can be applied to
nd the new sets of optimum values.
Fig. 5. Variation of Nu W.R.T Vs for various heights of jets when Re = 100, P = 8B.
6. Conclusions
From the simulation data local Nusselt number was calculated as
Nu
T
:
z
Nux; y
dxdy:
Lx Ly
Table 2
Optimization results.
GA
GA
In this work CFD has been combined with biologically inspired optimization techniques for analyzing the heat transfer from a moving surface due to impinging slot jets. Simulations were carried out by varying
different parameters like P, H and Vs. The results from the above simulations are used to train a feed forward back propagation ANN which
is fed into Micro-Genetic Algorithm to get optimum heat transfer
(Nu). Micro-GA shows faster convergence to optimum than standard
GA.
Initial simulations show that with lower value of pitch between jets
and minimum height of the jet leads to higher heat transfer at all surface
velocities. Optimization results also conrm this. The surface velocity
should also be minimum, as suggested in previous works. The work establishes a methodology for combining several parameters for optimization of heat transfer performance from impinging jets.
References
Re
Vs
Nu
Time (sec)
100
200
100
200
6
6
6
6
1.126
1
1.122
1
0.016
0.125
0.056
0.194
4.87
7.04
4.87
7.05
4
4
10
10
[1] H. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Saha, Simulation of laminar slot jets impinging on a moving
surface, ASME J. Heat Transf. 124 (2002) 10491055.
[2] H. Chattopadhyay, G. Biswas, N.K. Mitra, Heat transfer from a moving surface due to
impinging jets, ASME J. Heat Transf. 124 (2002) 433440.
[3] H. Chattopadhyay, Numerical investigations of heat transfer from impinging annular
jet, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 47 (2004) 31973201.
P.K. Kadiyala, H. Chattopadhyay / International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 59 (2014) 143147
[4] H. Chattopadhyay, Effect of surface motion on transport processes due to circular
impinging jetsa numerical study, Drying Technol. 24 (2006) 13471351.
[5] H. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Saha, Numerical investigations of heat transfer over a moving
surface due to impinging knife-jets, Numer. Heat Transf. Part A 39 (2001) 531549.
[6] H. Chattopadhyay, S.K. Saha, Turbulent ow and heat transfer from a slot jet impinging on a moving plate, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24 (2003) 685697.
[7] H. Chattopadhyay, A.C. Benim, Turbulent heat transfer over a moving surface due to
impinging slot jets, ASME J. Heat Transf. 133 (2011) 104502.
[8] T. Cziesla, G. Biswas, H. Chattopadhyay, N.K. Mitra, Large Eddy Simulation of ow
and heat transfer in an impinging slot jet, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 22 (2001) 500508.
[9] R.R. Madadi, C. Balaji, Optimization of the location of multiple discrete heat sources
in a ventilated cavity using articial neural networks and micro genetic algorithm,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 51 (2008) 22992312.
147
[10] P.K. Kadiyala, H. Chattopadhyay, Optimal location of three heat sources on the wall
of a square cavity using genetic algorithms integrated with articial neural networks, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 38 (2011) 620624.
[11] L. Gosselin, M. Tye-Gingras, F. Mathieu-Potvin, Review of utilization of genetic algorithms in heat transfer problems, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 52 (2009) 21692188.
[12] H.W. Lee, Y.J. Teng, I.A. Azid, K.N. Seetharamu, Neuro-genetic optimization of micro
compact heat exchanger, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 17 (2007) 2033.
[13] S.V. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Taylor and Francis, 1978.
[14] B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order
sequel to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979) 101136.
[15] B. Yegnanarayana, Articial Neural Networks, Prentice-hall of India, 1999.
[16] D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning,
Addison Wesley, 1989.