Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER # 1
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC
Man is rational animal.
He differs from animals b/c of
rationality
So animals only exist but men live.
Man can reason(so invent & discover)
Logic teach him to reason correctly.
MAN
VS.
ANIMAL
DEFINITION OF LOGIC
HISTORY OF LOGIC
LOGIC TEACHES US
To reason correctly
IMPORTANTLY,
Logic is "therapeutic": we learn logic to
recognize and to construct good arguments.
Formal logic is an indispensable item in the
contemporary philosopher's toolkit.
It develops thinking abilities systematically
ARISTOTLES LOGIC
He says Logic studies thought
Thought means not process but product of
thought
1. Concept (Term)
2. Judgment (Proposition)
3. Inference (argument)
CONCEPT
Property of mind
Picture of a thing in mind
A mental image
E.g., table, chair, pen, book
TERM
Concept expressed in language
Categorematic: term by itself; man, table
Syncategorematic: not term by themselves;
the, an, all, only, of
Acategorematic: used in neither case,
hurrah!, Alas
TERM
Positive term
Negative term
private
TERMS
Positive: table, chair, man
Negative: not-table, not-chair
Private: blind, deaf, dumb
JUDGMENT
Relationship of affirmation/negation b/w two
concepts.
Intellectual activity
Comparison/ evaluation of particular effects
of an experience
Psychological activity of awareness of
objects and relationships
PROPOSITION
Judgment expressed in language
True or false statement
Witten or spoken statement in language
3 parts:
Subject
Predicate
copula
PROPOSITION
A logical sentence.
It consists of terms (subject & Predicate.
Subject and predicate are two classes
which are related or linked through copula.
Example of Proposition:
Subject
copula
Predicate
All Men
are
Mortal.
PROPOSITION
INFERENCE
Combination of more than 1 propositions
Mental activity
Where some propositions are given
(premises) , and other follow from them
(conclusion).
INFERENCE
A inference or reasoning is a process of
transition from known/perceived facts (Premises)
to unknown or unperceived reasoning.
You see smoke and infer/ reason that there is a
fire.
INFERENCE
REASONING
Premises
Conclusion
ARGUMENT
PREMISES
PREMISES INDICATORS
CONCLUSION INDICATORS
FORMAL ARGUMENT
Formal Argument deals with
1.
INFORMAL ARGUMENT
Deals with content (meaning) of argument.
Study of reasoning and fallacies in the
context of everyday language and life.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING
1. In deductive argument, we move from
universal (general info) to particular
(specific observation).
Example:
All men are mortal. (universal)
Socrates is a man.
Therefore, Socrates is mortal (particular)
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT
5. DEDUCTIVE REASONING IS A
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Because it moves from top (universal or
greater) to down (Particular or smaller).
All men are mortal. (top) Universal
Socrates is a man.
Socrates is mortal. (down) Particular
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Conclusion:
Aslam is a person.
TOP-DOWN APPROACH
INDUCTIVE REASONING
1. It moves from particular observations
to universal truth.
Crow 1 is black
Crow 2 is black
Particular facts
Crow 3 is black
Therefore, all crows are black. (universal)
INDUCTIVE REASONING
2. In this argument, conclusion is probably
follows from premises.
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
1. Premises provide
some support for
conclusion.
2. Relationship b/w
premises and conclusion
is CERTAIN.
2. Relationship b/w
premises and conclusion
is PROBABLE.
3. Valid or invalid
3. Strong or weak
5. Based on senseexperience
6. Conclusion necessarily
follows from premises
6. Conclusion probably
follows from premises
7. Mathematics is based on
deductive reasoning
SUMMARY
ARGUMENTS
Deductive
Begins from known statement
Inductive
Begins from unknown statement
Universal to particular
Particular to universal
Necessary support
Probable support
Valid
Invalid
Strong
weak
Inductive
argument
TRUTH
Truth and falsity are the characteristics of
propositions.
1. Material Truth: proposition should be
according to facts. Its changeable. Truth is
present in external world.
2. Formal Truth: its not conditional and
depends up its own nature. Unchangeable and
logical proposition.
VALIDITY
Validity and invalidity are characteristics of only
deductive arguments
Conclusion should necessarily follow from
premises.
It is formal aspect of thought.
Validity depends upon truth of premises and
conclusion.
Argument must be invalid, if all premises are true
and conclusion is false.
VALIDITY
SOUNDNESS
SOUND ARGUMENT
If deductive argument is valid and has all
premises true, then it is called sound
argument.
Sound Argument= Valid Argument+ All
True Premises
All men are mortal
Socrates is a man.
Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
UNSOUND ARGUMENT
Invalid argument with all (or one of) its
premises being false is unsound
argument.
STRONG ARGUMENT
It is a inductive argument in which
conclusion strongly follows from premises.
it is improbable for conclusion to be false
given that premises are true.
In weak inductive argument, conclusion
probably follows from premises.
Next Chapter
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM