Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CABINET -IN-CONFIDENCE
Copy No. ..
C A B I N E T
4..3
M I N U T E
(b)
(c)
2.
... /2
This document is the property of the Australian Government and is not to be copied or reproduced
CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE
[2]
(c)
Committee Secretary
This document is the property of the Australian Government and is not to be copied or reproduced
[3]
CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE
Submission No.
FOR CABINET
Title
Copy No.
Minister
i'l
Relation to
existing policy
Not applicable.
Sensitivity /Criticism
Not applicable.
Legislation
involved
Not applicable.
~ ency:
Not applicable .
r sultation:
Ministers/Depts
consulted
Is there
agreement?
Timing/handling of
announcement
Cost
Finance
Yes.
See ATTACHMENT A.
Not applicable.
Fin Yr (
Fin Yr (
Fin Yr (
Not applicable.
This document is the property of the Australian Government and is not to be copied or reproduced
CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE
- 6227----
43
Cobinet-I9-Confidence
CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUES
The Government's macroeconomic and structural policies have
achieved considerable success in a number of areas. We have
an economy with many of the features we have sought:
a structural transformation in the fiscal position;
f~at public spending;
moderate private consumption;
sustained real wage restraint and very healthy
corporate profits;
strong private investment across the board, with a lot
happening in tradeable activities. Indeed, investment
is stronger relative to GDP than in either of the two
major resource development cycles in the 1960s and
1970s; and
outstanding employment growth, overwhelmingly in the
private sector.
The global economy has also proven very robust and the
already long expansion phase is forecast to continue for some
time yet.
2.
The main problem facing the Australian economy is, in a
nutshell, that it has been too buoyant:
so, despite a very welcome recovery in export prices
and the terms of trade, the current account deficit has
not narrowed as it must; and
price inflation has not come down anything like we had
hoped.
3.
While some of the budget's forecasts are now not going
to be met, this does not mean that our broad policy strategy
or framework is wrong. It isn't. Rather it is a question of
doing more within that framework to ensure that a protracted
period of overly strong demand pressures does not eat into
the fundamental changes that our policies have wrought and
jeopardise the continuation of our strategy. If that can be
avoided Australia can emerge from this ove~ly strong
investment boom with fundamentals which will underpin
prosperity through the 1990s.
4.
As 1988 unfolded our policies were indeed adjusted in
just this way and, at the time of the 1988-89 Budget, there
was a good chance that with the Wage/Tax Trade-Off (WTT) in
Cabinet-In-Confidence
[4]
Cabinet-In-Confidence
3
Cabinet-In~ Confidence
[5]
Cabinet-In-Confidence
4
9.
Nevertheless it is very important that fiscal policy
continue to act as a restraining influence on demand and we
must maintain fully the strength of fiscal policy and
possibly do a little more.
10.
For some time, we have recognised that this year would
be pivotal in terms of seeking major improvements in wage
determination arrangements. The growing pressures evident
throughout most sectors of the economy have now clearly
reduced the prospects for securing a significant step-down in
inflation from the WTT this year. Indeed, the WTT must now
concentrate on helping to prevent a serious acceleration in
wages. This would be a significant achievement in historical
terms. Beyond that, of course, we must concentrate on
getting in place an award restructuring framework which can
withstand pressures for a rapid and large general wage round
and which makes a lasting improvement in the industrial
relations system.
11.
The need to spread out the impact of the award
restructuring so as to achieve a wages outcome next year no
greater than that for this year must be a prime consideration
in our wage tax negotiations.
12.
A hallmark of our policy approach has been to look to
integrate macroeconomic policy and structural reforms.
Macroeconomic policies can help to provide the best
environment for structural reform - by maintaining growth of
employment and investment, but demand should not be so
buoyant as to reward also the least efficient and fan
inflation. It is the structural characteristics of the
economy which ultimately determine its performance
potential. I believe that we must aggressively continue to
pursue opportunities for structural reform across a broad
front. We must maintain momentum so that business and the
workforce continue to respond. Key opportunities - in terms
of public perceptions and economic effects - will arise in
the next few months with reports on the waterfront and
coastal shipping and continuing governmept _business_
Cabinet-In-Confidence
[6]
[7]
Cabinet-ln-Contidence
5
enterprise reforms.
There
But
% real growth
Outlays
82.4
86.2
-0.1
Revenue
tax
non-tax
total
83.7
4.8
.8JL...5.
92.8
4.1
li.S
5.9
-18.5
4.6
6.1
1.9
10.7
3.0
Surplus
% of GDP
15.
[abinet-In-Confidence
Cabinet-~ . confidence
16.
That starting point will be very substantially reduced,
of course, by the foreshadowed tax cuts and associated
increases in family assistance. The acceptable scope of
those costs to the Budget will, within limits, be dependent
on what can be obtained on the wages front and our own
expenditures. In any event, the fiscal outcome after the WTT
must contribute to lower pressures on the external account
from excessive domestic demand, as well as to reducing the
burden on monetary policy. It will not be easy to balance
all these objectives. However, at this stage, I consider
that we should be aiming for:
a further real reduction in budget outlays; and
this year's zero net PSBR must be repeated or bettered.
17.
So far as the Commonwealth sector is concerned, a zero
net PSBR would require continued restraint in Commonwealth
authorities' borrowing programs in the face of ongoing
aircraft and other re-equipment programs. There will also be
an overwhelming requirement to seek to match new policy
initiatives by offsetting savings. Indeed, we should begin
the Budget round looking to achieve further savings on
Commonwealth outlays; not least to counter the prospective
large increase (currently at 2 1/2 per cent) in the forward
estimates for 1990-91.
18.
There is merit in announcing some expenditure saving
decisions for 1989-90 in the April statement on the WTT,
which could affect some of the new family assistance
spending. Such decisions would provide a further signal to
the community that the Government has not shifted in its
resolve to maintain the fiscal consolidation process of
recent years, and that the period of restraint is not over.
Some positive references in that Statement to assets sales
would also help in the same way.
19.
In recent years, the Commonwealth has achieved
significant savings in payments to the States and has also
achieved significant reductions in the States' global
borrowing limits. I have already indicate4 to the ~tates
that this restraint will continue to be applied by the
Commonwealth next financial year. However, savings in
payments to the States next financial year will not be as
great as they have been in recent years. That only serves to
underline the importance of not easing-up on the
commonwealth s
Ulbmef-1n:(onfidence
[8]
[9]
Cabinet -In-Confidence
7
recommend that
Ministers:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
and
P.J. KEATING
1 March 1989
Cabinet-In-Confidence
[10]
Co binet-In-Confidence
. .
- 8 -
ATTACHMENT.A
In particular, it strongly
Finance
t~e
t~us
:obinet-In-Confidence