Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x
DOI 10.1007/s12206-014-0806-y
Abstract
This paper presents, for the first time, an analytical solution for free vibrations of an isotropic circular plate in axisymmetric modes
based on the two variables refined plate theory. This theory accounts for a quadratic variation of the transverse shear strains across the
thickness, and satisfies the zero traction boundary conditions on the surfaces of the plate without using shear correction factors. Governing equations are derived using Hamiltons principle and an analytical method on the basis of using Bessel functions is introduced to
solve them. By this procedure, final form of the governing equations is obtained in matrix form. These equations are solved for classical
boundary conditions and comparison studies are performed to verify the validity of the present results. It is found that the results obtained
using RPT and TSDT are close to each other. As a benchmark, numerical results are presented in a dimensionless form for various values
of thickness to radius ratio.
Keywords: Analytical solution; Circular plate; Free vibration; Refined plate theory
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Introduction
Plates are greatly used in many branches of industrial fields
such as mechanical, aeronautic, electronic and marine engineering. As one of the most important structural elements,
circular plates are widely used specially in high speed rotating
engineering systems. Usually, these structures are subjected to
damaging vibrations due to dynamic loads and free vibration
analysis of them would be necessary to have a good design.
Depending on the thickness of the plates, several theories
such as classical plate theory (CPT), first-order shear deformation plate theory (FSDT), and higher-order shear deformation
plate theory (HSDT) have been developed. Among them the
CPT is the simplest method in which the transverse shear deformation is neglected. This theory gives accurate results for
thin plates but gradually loses its accuracy as the plate thickness increases. A comprehensive survey of research studies
shows that many researchers such as Leissa [1], Weisensel [2]
and Liew et al. [3] analyzed free vibrations of circular plates
based on the CPT. A detailed discussion about CPT can be
found in the Ref. [4]. To overcome the lack of CPT, Reissner
[5] and Mindlin [6] developed the FSDT, including the effects
of shear deformations and rotary inertia. Some researchers
such as Rao and Prasad [7], Liew et al. [8], and Irie et al. [9]
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 341 2111763, Fax.: +98 341 2120964
E-mail address: amirhosein.shahdadi@yahoo.com
presented their analysis on the basis of FSDT. A good discussion about FSDT is available in a research by Wang et al. [10].
Since the FSDT does not obey the zero shear strain conditions
on the top and bottom surfaces of the plate, a shear correction
factor is needed to correct the shear strains (consequently,
shear stresses) distribution through the plate thickness. This
factor, which cannot be determined easily, not only depends
on the material and geometric properties but also on the loading and boundary conditions. To avoid using a shear correction factor, various types of higher-order shear deformation
theories including several unknown functions have been developed [11-16]. In these theories, the number of governing
equations and boundary conditions will be going up as the
order of the theory increases. Among several higher-order
shear deformation theories, the third-order shear deformation
theory (TSDT) [15] is the most greatly adopted model in the
study of plates. Due to its third-order displacement field, the
zero shear stress condition is satisfied at the free surfaces.
Refined plate theory (RPT) that was proposed by Shimpi [17]
is similar to the third-order shear deformation theory [15] but
only with two unknown functions and two PDEs in contrast
with five unknown functions and five PDEs in TSDT. The
RPT is based on the assumption that the transverse and inplane displacements consist of bending and shear components
in which the bending components do not contribute toward
shear forces and, likewise, the shear components do not contribute toward bending moments. Also shear components of
3450
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
(1)
z u zb
.
r q
(2)
urb = - z
uqb = -
1 z 5 z 3 u s
u zb
+ h - z
r
4 h 3 h r
(3)
uq ( r ,q , z , t ) = uqb ( r ,q , z , t ) + uqs ( r ,q , z , t ) =
3
z u zb h 1 z 5 z u zs
+ -
r q
r 4 h 3 h q
(4)
u z ( r ,q , z , t ) = u zb ( r ,q , t ) + u zs ( r ,q , t ) .
(5)
e rr = - z
1 z 5 z 3 2u s
2u zb
- 2z
+
h
r 2
4 h 3 h r
(6)
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
eqq
g rq = -
gq z
{M rr , M qq , M rq , Qrr , Qqq } =
2
5
z u s
= - 5 z
4
h r
2
5
z 1 u zs
= - 5
h r q
4
(8)
s qq = -
t rq =
(19)
(10)
1 2u zb 1 u zb
2u zb
+
+n
M qq = - D 2
2
r r
r 2
r q
(20)
(11)
1 2u zb
1 u b
- 2 z
M rq = - D (1 - n )
r rq 2r q
tq z
(12)
Qrr =
5 Eh u zs
12 (1 + n ) r
(21)
Qqq =
5 Eh 1 u zs
12 (1 + n ) r q
(22)
D=
Eh3
12 1 - n 2
(23)
To obtain the governing differential equations and boundary conditions the Hamiltons principle [32] is used. Hence:
t2
d T - V dt = 0
(24)
t1
(14)
2
5
E
z 1 u zs
- 5
=
2 (1 + n ) 4
h r q
(15)
2
5
E
z u s
- 5 z
2 (1 + n ) 4
h r
(16)
t rz =
3
E 2 z 2u zb 2h 1 z 5 z
-
+
2 (1 + n ) r rq
r 4 h 3 h
3
z u b h 1 z 5 z u s
2u zs
+ 2 z - 2 - z
r q r q r 4 h 3 h q
(18)
(9)
2u zb
Ez 1 2u zb 1 u zb
Eh
n
+
+
+
2
2
2
2
r r
r 1 - n 2
1 - n r q
1 z 5 z 3 1 2u s 1 u s
2u zs
z
z
- 2
n
+
+
2
r r
r 2
4 h 3 h r q
(17)
2u b n u zb n 2u zb
+ 2
M rr = - D 2z +
r r
r q 2
r
Ez 2u zb n u zb n 2u zb
Eh
+
+ 2
+
2
2
2
r
r
1 - n r
r q 1 - n 2
1 z 5 z 3 2u s n u s n 2u s
z
z
- 2z +
+
r r r 2 q 2
4 h 3 h r
(7)
s rr = -
z =- h 2
3
2 z 2u zb 2h 1 z 5 z 2u zs
-
+
+
r rq
r 4 h 3 h rq
3
z u zb h 1 z 5 z u zs
- 2 -
2
r q r 4 h 3 h q
g rz
z =h 2
3
z u zb h 1 z 5 z u zs
=+ -
r r
r 4 h 3 h r
3
z 2u zb h 1 z 5 z 2u zb
+
r 2 q 2 r 2 4 h 3 h q 2
e zz = 0
3451
where E and n are Young modulus and Poisson ratio, respectively. It is clear that the zero traction boundary conditions on
the surfaces of the plate are satisfied. Therefore, the RPT does
not require the use of shear correction factors.
2.4 The moments and shear forces relations
The moment M rr , M qq , M rq and also shear forces Qrr and
Qqq are defined as:
1 h 2 2p a
2
2
2
r u& + v& + w& rdrdq dz
2 -h 2 0 0
V=
1 h 2 2p a
(s rre rr + s qq eqq + t rz e rz + t rq e rq +tq zeq z ) rdrdq dz
2 -h 2 0 0
(25)
(26)
in which a is the radius of the circular plate, r is the plate
density and dot-overscript convention represents the differentiation with respect to the time variable t .
Substituting Eqs. (3)-(16) into above definitions and inte-
3452
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
grating through the thickness of the plate, two governing equations for dynamic behavior of circular plates based on the two
variables refined plate theory can be derived as:
3
D 2r 2r u zb -
rh
12 t 2
( u ) +
2 b
r z
(27)
2 b
u z + u zs = 0
t 2
5 (1 - n ) D 2 s
1
r uz D 2r 2r u zs 84
h2
rh
r h3 2
1008 t
( u ) + r h t (u
2 s
r z
b
z
+ u zs = 0
(28)
2r =
d2 1 d
+
.
dr 2 r dr
(29)
B1b u zb : either d u zb = 0
or
3u b 1
2u b 1 u b
D 3z + (1 + 2n ) 2z + 2 z +
r
r
r r
r
r h3 2 u zb
(30)
=0
12 t 2 r
u b
B2b u zb : either d z
r
= 0
or
2u b n u zb
- D 2z +
=0
r r
r
(31)
B1s u zs : either d u zs = 0
or
u s
B2s u zs : either d z
r
= 0
= 0
D 2u zs u u zs
+
=0.
84 r 2
r r
2u s
5 Eh u zs D 3u zs 1
+ 3 + (1 + 2u ) 2z +
r
(1 + u ) r 84 r r
1 u zs r h3 2 u zs
+
r 2 r 1008 t 2 r
(32)
or
(33)
In the previous section, the governing equations and the related boundary conditions were obtained for free axisymmetric vibrations of an isotropic homogenous circular plate of
uniform thickness h and radius a , as shown in Fig. 1. In order
to solve these equations in an analytical approach, consider a
synchronous motion in lateral direction in which the time dependences of u zb ( r , t ) and u zs ( r , t ) are the same.
u zb ( r , t ) = wb ( r ) f ( t )
(34)
u zs
(35)
( r, t ) = w ( r ) f (t ) .
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
W1b =
W1s =
W 2s =
r 1 -n 2 w 2
, Wb2 =
E
-420 (1 - n )
h2
12 r 1 - n 2 w 2
Eh
r 1 -n 2 w 2
+
(41)
1008r 1 - n 2 w 2
Eh
With respect to Eqs. (39) and (40) a characteristic polynomial is defined. On the basis of the roots of this polynomial,
the functions wb ( r ) and ws ( r ) can be written as:
wb ( r ) = C1 + C2 J 0 ( l2 r ) + C3 J 0 ( l3r ) + C4 J 0 ( l4 r )
(36)
r 1 -n 2 w 2
2r 2r wb ( r ) +
)w
2r wb ( r ) -
G (l ) =
( w ( r ) + w ( r )) = 0
-420 1 - n
( ) + r (1 - n ) w
w (r) +
b
(37)
Eh 2
2
r
2
r
h2
1008r 1 - n 2 w 2
Eh
( w ( r ) + w ( r )) = 0 .
b
(38)
d4 b
2 d3
1
w ( r ) + 3 wb ( r ) + W1b - 2
4
r dr
dr
r
d2 b
Wb 1 d b
2 w ( r ) + 1 + 3 w ( r ) r
dr
dr
r
Wb2 wb ( r ) + ws ( r ) = 0
d4 s
2 d3
1
w ( r ) + 3 ws ( r ) + W1s - 2
4
r dr
dr
r
(39)
l 4 - W1bl 2 - Wb2
Wb2
B1b 1
B b 1
2
B s 1
1
B s 1
2
B1b J 0 ( l2 r )
B1b J 0 ( l3r )
B2b J 0 ( l2 r )
B2b J 0 ( l3r )
B1s J 0 ( l2 r )
B1s J 0 ( l3r )
B2s J 0 ( l2 r )
B2s J 0 ( l3r )
(44)
(40)
B1b J 0 ( l4 r )
C1
B2b J 0 ( l4 r ) C2
= 0
B1s J 0 ( l4 r ) C3
C
B2s J 0 ( l4 r ) 4
(45)
in which r = a .
Setting the determinant of the coefficients matrix of the
above equation equal to zero, natural frequencies are obtained
for desired boundary conditions.
Edge of the circular plate may take any boundary conditions,
including clamped, free, and simply supported as follows:
1. For a clamped edge at r = a
u zb = 0 B1b u zb = 0
d2 s
Ws 1 d s
2 w ( r ) + 1 + 3 w ( r ) r
dr
r
dr
W 2s wb ( r ) + ws ( r ) = 0
(43)
By applying the boundary conditions introduced as operators in the previous section, the final form of governing equations in matrix form is obtained:
2 ws ( r ) r
+C4G ( l4 ) J 0 ( l4 r )
12 r 1 - n
(42)
&&f + w 2 f = 0
3453
(46)
u zb
= 0 B2b u zb = 0
r
(47)
u zs = 0 B1s u zs = 0
(48)
u zs
(49)
= 0 B2s u zs = 0 .
3454
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
r 2 r 12 r
b
b
= 0 B1 u z = 0
2u b n u zb
M rr = - D 2z +
r r
r
b
b
= 0 B2 u z = 0
(50)
Boundary
conditions
Clamped
(51)
Free
2u s
5 Eh u zs D 3u zs 1
+ 3 + (1 + 2n ) 2z +
r
(1 + n ) r 84 r r
1 u zs r h3 u&&zs
+
r 2 r 1008 r
s
s
= 0 B1 u z = 0
5 Eh u zs
= 0 B2s u zs = 0 .
Qrr =
12 (1 + n ) r
(52)
(53)
(54)
2u b n u zb
b
b
M rr = - D 2z +
= 0 B2 u z = 0
r
r
(55)
u zs
(56)
=0
B1s
u zs
=0
D 2u zs n u zs
+
84 r 2
r r
s
s
= 0 B2 u z = 0 .
(57)
Simply
supported
(58)
RPT
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
10.2157
39.7708
89.1024
158.1791
9.0030
38.4429
87.7488
156.814
FSDT
[33]
10.216
39.771
89.104
158.184
9.003
38.443
87.750
156.818
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HSDT
[34]
10.2157
39.7708
89.1024
158.179
9.0030
38.4429
87.7488
156.814
%Diff
%Diff
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.9354
4.935
0.00
4.93536
0.00
1
2
3
29.7199
74.1551
138.315
29.720
74.156
138.318
0.00
0.00
0.00
29.7199
74.1551
138.315
0.00
0.00
0.00
Free
Simply
supported
RPT
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
8.8464
27.6223
50.4945
75.1311
8.2728
28.6940
52.9387
77.7917
FSDT
[33]
8.807
27.253
49.420
73.054
8.267
28.605
52.584
76.936
4.6988
1
2
3
23.3216
47.0810
72.4067
%Diff
HSDT [34]
%Diff
0.45
1.34
2.13
2.76
0.07
0.31
0.67
1.10
8.84637
27.6223
50.4941
75.1309
8.27233
28.6931
52.9333
77.7821
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.696
0.06
4.69853
0.00
23.254
46.775
71.603
0.29
0.65
1.11
23.3190
47.0716
72.4038
0.00
0.00
0.00
RPT are still in good agreement with those of HSDT. However for thick plates the inaccuracy of FSDT is increased,
particularly in the higher modes of vibration. The reason for
this fact is that the Mindlin model cannot capture the boundary layer term for the clamped edge, while the HSDT can [34].
Coincidence of the results of the RPT on those of the HSDT
shows that the two variables refined plate theory can either
capture the boundary layer term for such a boundary condition.
It is valuable to say that all results obtained on the basis of
RPT are greater than those of the FSDT and the HSDT.
It should be expressed that the RPT has only two unknown
functions and two governing equations compared to three and
five unknown functions (and governing equations) in case of
FSDT and HSDT, respectively. Furthermore, the differential
governing equations in the current theory are only inertially
coupled and there is no elastic coupling. Whereas, the differential governing equations in FSDT and HSDT are coupled
elastically as well as inertially, so that solving governing equations in FSDT and HSDT are more difficult in comparison
with the RPT.
3455
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
Table 3. Comparisons of non-dimensional frequency parameters w under different boundary conditions with those obtained by 3-D Ritz
solution [35].
h/a
Method
n
0
0.01
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
10.2130
10.250
-0.36
39.7336
39.8780
-0.36
0.10
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
9.9461
9.9909
-0.45
36.5489
36.7440
-0.53
0.20
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
9.2650
9.3225
-0.62
30.4748
30.6490
-0.57
0.30
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
8.4113
8.4676
-0.67
25.1020
25.1500
-0.19
0.01
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
9.0017
9.0018
0.00
38.4165
38.4170
0.00
0.10
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
8.8688
8.8720
-0.04
36.0613
38.1320
-0.20
0.20
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
8.5085
8.5194
-0.13
31.1748
-
0.30
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
8.0151
8.0344
-0.24
26.3884
-
0.01
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
4.9348
4.9360
-0.03
29.7039
29.7060
-0.01
0.10
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
4.8943
4.8975
-0.07
28.2547
28.3100
-0.2
0.20
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
4.7788
4.7876
-0.19
25.0414
25.1880
-0.58
0.30
RPT
3D Ritz [35]
%Diff
4.6071
4.6234
-0.35
21.6757
21.8790
-0.94
CPT [4]
FSDT [33]
HSDT [34]
RPT
10
w^
Boundary
conditions
Clamped
11
Free
Simply
supported
Table 3 shows the comparison of the non-dimensional frequency parameters of circular plates with clamped, free, and
simply supported boundary conditions for several values of
thickness to radius ratios, obtained on the basis of the present
theory, with those obtained using the Ritz 3-D method [35]. It
is obviously seen, from this table, that, the results based on the
RPT have a good accuracy and the difference between the
8
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
h/a
Fig. 2. Comparison of non-dimensional fundamental frequency parameter of clamped circular plates among different theories.
3456
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
Table 4. Comparisons of non-dimensional frequency parameters w of clamped circular plates with those obtained by the DQM [36].
h/a
Method
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
n
0
10.1459
10.145
0.01
0.05
1
38.8706
38.855
0.04
2
85.0647
84.995
0.08
3
146.6010
146.40
0.14
4
221.1730
220.73
0.20
5
306.5433
305.71
0.27
6
400.7182
399.32
0.35
0.10
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
9.9461
9.9408
0.05
36.5489
36.479
0.19
75.9564
75.664
0.39
124.0582
123.32
0.60
177.8622
176.41
0.82
235.3854
232.97
1.03
295.3663
291.71
1.24
0.15
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
9.6419
9.6286
0.14
33.5525
33.393
0.47
66.1297
65.551
0.87
103.3948
102.09
1.26
143.2521
140.93
1.62
184.6004
180.99
1.96
226.8374
221.62
2.30
0.20
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
9.2650
9.2400
0.27
30.4748
30.211
0.87
57.5329
56.682
1.48
87.3219
85.571
2.01
118.4924
115.55
2.48
150.3717
145.94
2.95
176.3780
174.97
0.8
0.25
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.8464
8.8068
0.45
27.6223
27.253
1.34
50.4945
49.420
2.13
75.1311
73.054
2.76
100.5677
97.198
3.36
118.3312
117.90
0.37
127.0981
122.43
3.67
Table 5. Comparisons of non-dimensional frequency parameters w of free circular plates with those obtained by the DQM [36].
h/a
Method
n
0
0.05
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.9687
8.9686
0.00
37.7930
37.787
0.02
84.4731
84.443
0.04
146.8520
146.76
0.06
222.5978
222.38
0.10
309.4111
308.98
0.14
405.2007
404.44
0.20
0.10
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.8688
8.8679
0.01
36.0613
36.041
0.06
76.7777
76.676
0.13
126.5641
126.27
0.23
182.0917
181.46
0.35
241.1410
239.98
0.48
302.2962
300.38
0.63
0.15
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.7114
8.7095
0.02
33.7158
33.674
0.12
68.0105
67.827
0.27
106.8951
106.40
0.46
147.8660
146.83
0.70
189.6208
187.79
0.97
231.2722
228.39
1.25
0.20
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.5085
8.5051
0.04
31.1748
31.111
0.20
59.9152
59.645
0.45
90.7512
90.645
0.12
121.9308
120.57
1.12
151.7731
149.63
1.41
172.6729
171.18
0.86
0.25
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
8.2728
8.2674
0.06
28.6940
28.605
0.31
52.9387
52.584
0.67
77.7917
76.936
1.10
100.9437
99.545
1.39
115.5963
114.53
0.92
127.9631
126.34
1.27
3. Conclusion
In this paper, analytical solutions were presented to investigate free axisymmetric vibrations behavior of isotropic circular plates based on the two variables refined plate theory
(RPT) for the first time. The accuracy of the RPT was verified
by comparing the natural frequencies for circular plates under
classical boundary conditions with those available in the literatures. For thin plates, CPT, FSDT, HSDT, and RPT, are
acquired the same frequency parameters, but the inconsistency
was increased as the plate becomes thicker. For these plates
FSDT, HDST, and RPT served almost the same results. Comparing to the other solutions, the proposed analytical solution
based on the RPT was closer to the HSDT. Therefore, it can
be concluded that the RPT which does not require a shear
correction factor can be successfully used for analyzing vibrational behavior of plates since it is the simplest yet accurate
shear deformable theory with only two variables.
3457
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
Table 6. Comparisons of non-dimensional frequency parameters w of simply supported circular plates with those obtained by the DQM [36].
h/a
Method
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
n
0
4.9248
4.9247
0.00
0.05
1
29.3271
29.323
0.01
2
71.7804
71.756
0.03
3
130.4288
130.35
0.06
4
203.0002
202.81
0.09
5
287.1791
286.79
0.13
6
380.8229
380.13
0.18
0.10
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
4.8943
4.8938
0.01
28.2547
28.240
0.05
66.0242
65.942
0.12
113.8230
113.57
0.22
168.0911
167.53
0.33
226.4014
225.34
0.47
287.2188
285.44
0.62
0.15
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
4.8446
4.8440
0.01
26.7444
26.715
0.11
59.2143
59.062
0.26
97.2090
96.775
0.45
137.9151
136.98
0.68
179.9580
178.23
0.96
222.7053
219.86
1.28
0.20
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
4.7788
4.7773
0.03
25.0414
24.994
0.19
52.7384
52.514
0.43
83.3846
82.766
0.74
115.1841
113.87
1.14
147.4997
145.13
1.61
166.3833
166.29
0.06
0.25
RPT
DQM [36]
%Diff
4.6988
4.6963
0.05
23.3216
23.254
0.29
47.0810
46.775
0.65
72.4067
71.603
1.11
98.2800
96.609
1.70
108.3260
108.27
0.05
124.4988
121.50
2.41
Table 7. Non-dimensional frequency parameters w of clamped circular plates with different thickness to radius ratios.
h/a
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
n
0
10.1459
9.9461
9.6419
9.2650
8.8464
1
38.8707
36.5489
33.5525
30.4748
27.6223
2
85.0647
75.9564
66.1297
57.5329
50.4945
3
146.6010
124.0582
103.3948
87.3219
75.1311
4
221.1730
177.8622
143.2521
118.4924
100.5677
5
306.5433
235.3854
184.6004
150.3717
118.3312
6
400.7182
295.3663
226.8374
176.3780
127.0981
5
309.4111
241.1410
189.6208
151.7731
115.5963
6
405.2007
302.2962
231.2722
172.6729
127.9631
Table 8. Non-dimensional frequency parameters w of free circular plates with different thickness to radius ratios.
h/a
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
n
0
8.9687
8.8688
8.7114
8.5085
8.2728
1
37.7930
36.0613
33.7158
31.1748
28.6940
2
84.4731
76.7777
68.0105
59.9152
52.9387
3
146.8520
126.5641
106.8951
90.7512
77.7917
4
222.5978
182.0917
147.8660
121.9308
100.9437
Table 9. Non-dimensional frequency parameters w of simply supported circular plates with different thickness to radius ratios.
h/a
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
n
0
4.9248
4.8943
4.8446
4.7788
4.6988
1
29.3271
28.2547
26.7444
25.0414
23.3216
2
71.7804
66.0242
59.2143
52.7384
47.0810
3
130.4288
113.8230
97.2090
83.3846
72.4067
References
[1] A. W. Leissa, Vibration of plates, NASA SP-169, Ofce of
Technology Utilization, Washington (1969).
[2] G. N. Weisensel, Natural frequency information for circular
and annular plates, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 133
(1989) 129-134.
[3] K. M. Liew, Y. Xiang and S. Kitipornchai, Research on
thick plate vibration: a literature survey, Journal of Sound
and Vibration, 180 (1) (1995) 163-176.
[4] S. P. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger, Theory of
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
4
203.0002
168.0911
137.9151
115.1841
98.2800
5
287.1791
226.4014
179.9580
147.4997
108.3260
6
380.8229
287.2188
222.7053
166.3833
124.4988
3458
A. H. Shahdadi and M. A. Hajabasi / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (9) (2014) 3449~3458
(2012) 3870-3882.
[27] H. T Thai and S. E. Kim, Levy-type solution for buckling
analysis of orthotropic plates based on two variable rened plate
theory, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 93 (2011) 1738-1746.
[28] S. Narendar, Buckling analysis of micro-/nano-scale plates
based on two variable refined plate theory incorporating nonlocal scale effects, Composite Structure, 93 (2011) 3093-3103.
[29] H. T. Thai, A nonlocal beam theory for bending, buckling,
and vibration of nanobeams, International Journal of Engineering Science, 52 (2012) 56-64.
[30] P. Malekzadeh and M. Shojaee, Free vibration of nanoplates based on a nonlocal two variable refined plate theory,
Composite Structure, 95 (2013) 443-452.
[31] A. P. Boresi, Elasticity in Engineering Mechanics, John
Wiley Publishing Company, New York, USA (2011).
[32] J. N. Reddy, Energy principles and variational methods in
Applied Mechanics, John Wiley Publishing Company, New
York, USA (1984).
[33] T. Irie, G. Yamada and K. Takagi, Natural frequencies of circular plates, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 47 (1980) 652-655.
[34] Sh. Hosseini-Hashemi, M. Eshaghi, H. Rokni Damavandi
Taher and M. Fadaie, Exact closed-form frequency equations for thick circular plates using a third-order shear deformation theory, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329
(2010) 3382-3396.
[35] K. M. Liew and B. Yang, Three-dimensional elasticity
solutions for free vibrations of circular plates: a polynomialsRitz analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and
Engineering, 175 (1999) 189-201.
[36] K. M. Liew, J. B. Han and Z. M. Xiao, Vibration analysis of
circular Mindlin plates using the differential quadrature method,
Journal of Sound and Vibration, 205 (5) (1997) 617-630.