Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
NATIONAL RIVER CONSERVATION PLAN (NRCP) SCHEME
OFFICE MEMORANDUM(NLCP)
NATIONAL LAKE CONSERVATION PLAN (NLCP) SCHEME
REVISED GUIDE LINES FOR PREPARATION OF DPRs
FORCONSERVATION OF RIVERS & LAKES
6. CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION
7. CHAPTER II : STATUS OF THE RIVER/LAKE SYSTEM & SELECTION
OF TOWNS
8. CHAPTER III ; INVESTIGATIONS FOR DPR PREPRARATION
9. CHAPTER IV: DESIGN OF SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS
10. CHAPTER V : OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
11. CHAPTER VI : PUBLIC AWARENESS. & PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
12. CHAPTER VII : HRD AND CAPACITY BUILDING
13. CHAPTER VIII : PROJECT MANAGEMENT & INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
14. CHAPTER IX : FINANCING
15. CHAPTER X : MONITORING & EVALUATION
16. CHAPTER XI : COST ESTIMATES AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF
DPRS
17. ANNEXURE I : RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT THE XTH MEETING OF
THE
NRCA MARCH2001 PM IN CHAIR.
18. ANNEXURE II : GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF SCHEMES OF
LOW
19. COST SANITATION (LCS)
20. ANNEXURE III :GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF SCHEMES OF
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNDER RIVER PLAN
21. ANNEXURE IV GUIDE LINE FOR PLANTATION UNDER NATIONAL
RIVER ACTION PLAN
22. ANNEXURE V Norms for Staff & Staff Quarters Required on Sewage Pumping
Stations & STPs
23. ANNEXURE VI GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC AWARENESS AND PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION IN NATIONAL RIVER ACTION PLAN SCHEMES OF
THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS
24. ANNEXURE VIII-A :COMPLETION REPORT (General Abstract of Cost)
25. ANNEXURE VIII-B :COMPLETION REPORT
26. Ministry of Environment & Forests UTILISATION CERTIFICATE
G.11011/2/2001-NRCD.I
Ministry of Environment & Forests
National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD)
Dated 13th August 2002
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
As required by Department of Expenditure OMs no. 1(3)/PF. II/2001 dated 10th May
2002 and 10th July 2002, the matter of continuation of National River Conservation Plan (NRCP)
Scheme in 10th Plan has been examined in consultation with JS&FA, and it has been decided to
continue the NRCP scheme during 10th Plan.
A copy of the NRCP Scheme and its guidelines is enclosed.
This issues with JS&FAs concurrence vide his diary no. 1033/JS&FA/F 102 dated 12-08-02
G.11011/2/2001 NRCD. I
Ministry of Environment & Forests
National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD)
NATIONAL RIVER CONSERVATION PLAN (NRCP) SCHEME
1.0
Objective
To improve the water quality of major rivers, which are the major fresh water source in the
country, through the implementation of pollution abatement schemes.
2.0
Brief History
The river-cleaning programme of the Ministry of Environment and Forests was started with the
launching of the Ganga Action Plan GAP) in 1985. A Central Ganga Authority under the Prime
Minister was constituted to finalize the policy framework and to oversee the implementation of
the Action Plan. Chief Ministries of concerned States, Union Ministers and Secretaries of the
concerned Central Ministries and experts were its members. GAP was later extended to GAP
Phase-II in 1993 and then to NRCP in 1995. GAP Phase-II was merged into NRCP in December
1996. Since then a single scheme of NRCP is under implementation as a Centrally Sponsored
Scheme. The CGA was re-named as National River Conservation Authority (NRCA) with a
larger mandate to cover all the programmes supported by the National River Conservation
Directorate.
The functions of the NRCA are as follows:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
To lay down, promote and approve appropriate policies and programmes (long and
short-term) to achieve the objectives.
To examine and approve the priorities of the National River Conservation Plan.
To mobilize necessary financial resources.
To review the progress of implementation of approved programmes and give
necessary directions to the Steering Committee, and
To take all such measures as may be necessary to achieve the objectives.
Ganga Action Plan (GAP) Phase-I was started in 1985 as a 100% centrally funded scheme. The
main objective of GAP was to improve the water quality of Ganga to acceptable standards by
preventing the pollution load reaching the river. Under GAP Phase-I pollution abatement works
were taken up in 21 class-I towns in UP, Bihar and West Bengal. This Phase has been declared
complete on 31st March 2000 at a cost of Rs. 451.70 crore.
GAP Phase-I was extended to GAP Phase-II approved in stages between 1993 to 1996, which
covered the river Ganga and its major tributaries viz., Yamuna, Gomati and Damodar. This
action plan covers pollution abatement works in 95 towns along the polluted stretches of four
rivers spread over seven States. The total approved cost of this action plan is Rs. 1498.86 crore
which was approved on 50:50 cost sharing basis between the Centre and the State Governments.
Later, however, it was felt that the river conservation activity needed to be extended to other
rivers of the country also. Accordingly, the existing scheme was merged into a National River
Conservation Plan. National River Conservation Plan (NRCP) was approved for Rs. 772.08 crore
in 1995 on 50:50 cost sharing basis between the Centre and the State Government. The then
Ganga Project Directorate was converted into National River Conservation Directorate for
servicing the National River Conservation Authority and the Steering Committee. The objective
of National River Conservation Plan being to improve the water quality of the major rivers
which are the major fresh water source in the country through the implementation of pollution
abatement schemes. It covered pollution abatement works in 46 towns along the polluted
stretches of 18 rivers spread over 10 States. The Ganga Action Plan Phase-II was merged with
NRCP in December 1996. Seven additional towns of Tamil Nadu were approved in January
2001 at a cost of Rs. 575.30 crore on this funding pattern.
NRCP was converted into a 100% centrally funded scheme on the lines of GAP Phase I in
November 1998. The land cost was however, to be borne by the States. Chennai Waterways in
Tamil Nadu were approved in September 2000 at a cost of Rs. 491.52 crore and Yamuna Action
Plan (extended phase) was approved in May, 2001 at a cost of Rs. 222.60 crore based on this
funding pattern.
In a meeting of the National River Conservation Authority held in March, 2001 under the
Chairmanship of Prime Minister of India., it was decided to adopt an integrated approach for the
river cleaning programmes; and that all future works would be shared on a 70:30 basis between
the Centre and the State Governments. Of the State share, the share of public shall be minimum
of 10% of the total costs..
The chronology of approval and cost of various components of NRCP is given below:
S.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Component
12.
13.
14.
15.
3.0
Activities covered
The activities under NRCP include the following:
4.0
Interception and Diversion works to capture the raw sewage flowing into the river
through open drains and divert them for treatment.
Sewage Treatment Plants for treating the diverted sewage.
Low Cost Sanitation works to prevent open defecation on riverbanks.
Electric Crematoria and Improved Wood Crematoria to conserve the use of wood and
help in ensuring proper cremation of bodies brought to the burning ghats.
River Front Development works such as improvement of bathing ghats.
Public awareness and public participation.
HRD, capacity building, training and research in the area of River Conservation.
Other miscellaneous works depend upon location specific conditions including the
interface with human population.
Funding Pattern
5.0
3343.52
Projects or River Action Plans are considered by the Govt. on the basis of pre-feasibility report
estimates prepared by the State Govts. After the project is approved in principle, detailed project
reports (DPR) with firmed up cost estimates for various sub-components are prepared by the
State Govts./Project proponents. These DPRs are appraised and approved by the Ministry
following which Administrative Approval and Expenditure Sanctions are issued. On the basis of
these sanctions, the State Governments / implementing agencies award contracts according to
their own policy and rules.
Progress of implementation is monitored by both the State Implementing Agencies and the
Ministry through a multi-tier monitoring mechanism. This includes :
State Level
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
Central Level
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
6.0
7.0
J.16011/8/2002-NRCD
Ministry of Environment & Forests
National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD)
Dated 13th August 2002
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
As required by Department of Expenditure OMs no. 1(3)/PF. II/2001 dated 10th May
2002 and 10th July 2002, the matter of continuation of National Lake Conservation Plan (NLCP)
Scheme in 10th Plan has been examined in consultation with JS&FA, and it has been decided to
continue the NLCP scheme during 10th Plan.
A copy of the NLCP Scheme and its guidelines is enclosed.
This issues with JS&FAs concurrence vide his diary no. 1032/JS&FA/F/2 dated 12-08-02
J.16011/8/2002 NRCD
Ministry of Environment & Forests
National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD)
NATIONAL LAKE CONSERVATION PLAN (NLCP) SCHEME
1.0
Objective
The objective of the scheme is to restore and conserve the polluted and degraded
urban lakes of the country. To begin with, NLCP proposes to cover urban lakes,
especially those not covered under the Wetlands programme of the Ministry, with the
scope of activities to be expanded to include the rural water bodies.
2.0
Brief History
2.1
The Ministry of Environment & Forests had identified 10 polluted urban lakes for
conservation and management in 1994. The details of these lakes are given below:
SI
Lake
State
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dal
Sukhna
Sagar
Nainital
Kodai Kanal
Ooty
Udaipur
Rabindra Sarovar
Powai
Hussain Sagar
J&K
Chandigarh
MP
UP(Uttaranchal)
Tamilnadu
Tamilnadu
Rajasthan
West Bengal
Maharashtra
Andhra Pradesh
TOTAL
Cost
(Rs. In Crores)
297.70
44.36
4.41
46.35
19.28
26.63
148.95
2.13
31.01
15.34
636.16
Vide Deputy Chairmans DO no. 15050/6/93E&F/DCH/13/6369 dated 29th July 1997, the
Planning Commission conveyed the approval of NLCP as a 100% Centrally Sponsored Scheme.
Accordingly, a note covering the aforesaid 10 polluted urban lakes at an estimated cost of Rs.
637 crore was put up for approval of CCEA at its meeting held on 29.12.1997. CCEA considered
the note and directed the Ministry of Environment & Forests to bring up the matter for
consideration after a fresh appraisal of the scheme in the light of a firm tie up of external
financial assistance for financing NLCP. The Committee, however, approved, in principle, the
proposal to take up the scheme for conservation of the Dal Lake and decided that an amount upto
Rs. 20 crore may be spent on land acquisition which are considered absolutely necessary by way
of advance action for speedy implementation of the scheme in so far as it relates to the Dal Lake.
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.0
The Ministry posed NLCP for financial assistance to some of the bilateral multi-lateral
funding agencies viz; the World Bank, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, the
Government of Netherlands, the Government of Austria and European Commission,
However, none of these agencies evinced interest in the proposal.
Meanwhile, a High Power Committee under the Chairmanship of Union Home Minister
at its meeting held at Srinagar on 24.6.1998, decided that in the background of the
Cabinet decision on NLCP, the Planning Commission should look into it for purposes of
financing the Dal Lake Conservation Plan (DLCP) through internal resources. As
suggested by the Planning Commission, a detailed project report (DPR) on DLCP has
been prepared at an estimated cost of Rs. 162.87 crore. The cost of the DLCP, after
adding land cost of Rs. 87.10 crore for structures within and outside the lake body, shall
be Rs. 249.97 crore. The DPR was sent to the State Government in November 2000. The
response of the State Government on the DPR is awaited. On receipt of the comments
from the State Government, the proposal will be put up to the EFC and then to CCEA for
consideration and approval.
So far as the status of other identified lakes of NLCP is concerned, conservation and
managements plans of 3 lakes namely, Powai, Ooty and Kodaikanal were approved under
NLCP by CCEA in June 2001 at a cost of Rs. 14.90 crore, and the condition of external
assistance for NCLP was waived. These projects are under implementation. A
conservation and management plan for the Rabindra Sarovar lake at Calcutta has been
received and is under consideration in the Ministry. The Government of Uttaranchal has
appointed consultants for preparation of a DPR for the conservation and management
plan of Nainital Lake. As far the Hussain Sagar lake in Hyderabad, most of the works
have already been taken up by the State government under a separate scheme funded by
the World Bank. The Detailed Project Report for the remaining 3 lakes namely, Sagar,
Udaipur and Sukhna are yet to be received.
Meanwhile, in view of the several proposals received from State Governments for other
lakes and availability of funds under NLCP, it has been decided to take up such lakes
depending on the pollution status as well as availability of funds. Proposals for 4 lakes in
Bangalore city namely, Jaraganahalli, Kamakshipalya, Nagavara and Vengainahakere
have been approved at a total cost of Rs. 12.32 crore. A proposal for Man Sagar lake in
Jaipur is also under consideration. Similar proposals for other lakes would be taken up
subject to availability of funds.
Activities covered
The activities under NLCP include the following: (i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Catchment area treatment and lake beautification which may include bunding,
fencing creation of facilities for public recreation and entertainment (children
park, boating etc.) and public area.
Public awareness and public participation.
HRD, capacity building, training and research in the area of Lake Conservation.
Other activities depend upon location specific conditions including the interface
with human population.
State Governments or other Project Proponents would get perspective plans and detailed
Project Reports (DPRs) prepared through consultant or otherwise, for the above and for
conservation based on surveys including water quality and biodiversity data.
4.0
Funding Pattern
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
5.0
6.0
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION
1.1
The National River Conservation Directorate in the Ministry of Environment & Forests
had prescribed guidelines for the preparation of the Project Feasibility and the Detailed
Project Reports under the National River Conservation Plan. Since then a number of
developments have taken place including the resolutions passed by the National River
Conservation Authority (NRCA) in its meeting held in March 2001 (Annexure I). It has
therefore, been decided to issue new guidelines for the preparation of Detailed Project
Reports under the National River Conservation Plan and the National Lake Conservation
Plan consolidating the decisions taken from time to time. Since the proposals in future
will be considered on the basis of DPRs only, PFR are not to be submitted to the NRCD
and so the guidelines for preparing the PFRs are not being issued. These guidelines
supercede earlier guidelines and should be followed.
1.2
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
Collection of information about the river/lake and basin/ catchment useful for
system and component design.
1.2.5
1.2.6
1.2.7
Human, physical and financial resources required for Operation & Maintenance
and the manner in which they will be ensured.
1.2.8
1.2.9
1.2.10 Plan for project management & dealing with institutional issues identified
1.2.11 Plan to finance the project
1.2.12 Monitoring & Evaluation plan
1.2.13 Cost Estimates of DPRs with drawings and specifications
1.2.14 Any other item considered relevant and useful.
CHAPTER II : STATUS OF THE RIVER/LAKE SYSTEM & SELECTION OF TOWNS
While the causes of degradation of rivers and lakes are many, the towns and cities on
their banks with beaming population and industry are the most significant sources of
degradation of rivers, lakes and seas. In view of the limited resources available, it is not
possible to take up all degraded rivers and lakes for conservation together. It is, therefore,
necessary to prepare lists indicating priority of river/lakes and also of the cities/towns
where conservation programmes would be taken up in the X plan.
2.2
In order to select the river / lakes and cities / towns and arrange them in order of priority
for this programme, studies are required to be made based on the relevant data /
information. After the river / lake system has been studied and the major sources of
degradation identified, the cities on the banks responsible for their severe degradation
components need to be collected for preparing the DPR.
2.3
Collection of data/information
The following information of river/lake and basin/catchment is useful:
2.3.1
2.3.2
Topography
2.3.3
2.3.4
Land Use
2.3.5
2.3.4.1
Agriculture,
2.3.4.2
Forests,
2.3.4.3
Mining
2.3.4.4
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
Abstraction of water
2.3.9
2.4
2.3.14.1.
2.3.14.2.
2.3.14.3.
Sewerage,
2.3.14.4.
Drainage,
2.3.14.5.
2.3.14.6.
The above data may be collected from available sources and presented in figures,
charts and maps along description in brief.
2.4.2
If some of the information is not available or not adequate, fresh studies should
be undertaken only if it is felt that in the absence of the missing information, the
work of selecting the river/lake and the cities cannot be done.
If there are easily accessible facilities attempt should be made to use remote
sensing and present the spatial information in Geographical Information System
(GIS) format.
the water body-river, lake or the sea - - is so degraded that it cannot be put to its
traditional and desired use
2.5.2
2.5.3
2.7 Criteria for selecting towns for taking up Conservation of rivers and lakes
Works may be proposed in a town if
2.7.1
2.7.2
2.7.3
The water body (river/lake) is highly degraded and cannot be put to its
traditional/designated use because of
2.7.3.1 Discharge of domestic waste water/industrial waste
2.7.3.2 municipal solid waste
2.7.3.3 other non-point sources of pollution
2.7.4
2.7.5
Wrong land use in violation of the Master Plan leading to heavy soil erosion and
sediment transport to the water body.
2.7.6
There is high level of awareness about the city being the major cause of
degradation of the water body leading to the demand from the residents of the
town to take up conservation measures.
2.7.7
The citizens are willing to demonstrably raise additional resources and make
financial contribution of a minimum of 10% of the project cost and to meet the
recurring expenses of O& M and other heads.
2.7.8
The local body is willing to make its contribution and take responsibility for
preparing and implementing the project and carrying out O&M at its own cost.
2.7.9
The residents of the town, the local body and the State Government together are
willing to contribute a minimum of 30% of the project cost, out of which the
citizens are willing to contribute a minimum of 10% of the project cost.
3.1
3.1.2
Economic, social and cultural information may be obtained from the gazetteer,
plan documents prepared for submission to the State Planning Board or the State
Government and other sources.
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
Storm Water
3.1.6
3.1.7
3.1.8
Quantity and quality of waste water- sewage and sullage- in drains outfalling into
the river
3.1.9
3.1.10 Water quality upstream and down stream of the town and discharge of the water
body
3.1.11 Flora and Fauna
3.1.12 Non Point Sources of Pollution
3.1.11.1
3.1.11.2
3.1.11.3
3.1.11.4
3.1.11.5
3.1.11.6
Dairies
Motor Garages
Cattle wallowing
Open area and bank side defecation
Dead body and carcass dumping
Indiscriminate dumping of garbage in nearby banks and open areas.
3.1.13 River front facilities to improve aesthetics and reduce pollution / bank erosion.
3.1.14 Industrial effluent
3.2.2
Coast Line
3.2.3
Bathymetry Of Lake
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.3.5
Discharge measurement of all inflows into and outflows from the lake,
3.3.6
3.3.7
3.3.8
3.3.9
Satellite imagery can give the current land use map of the city and the catchment.
The State Remote Sensing Agency, if it is in a position to do so, could be asked to
prepare it using the most recent available imagery covering the area within
municipal limits and extending 10 Kms beyond the municipal limits. It may also
be asked to procure the maps prepared by the National Remote Sensing Agency
(NRSA) under their Natural Resources Information System, the map of the
municipal body and the Master Plan of the city should also be collected.
However, if it is difficult or time consuming to get these inputs from the NRSA or
the State Remote Sensing Agency, the map of the municipal body and the local
Development Authority may be used.
3.4.2
The contour interval in the maps of the Survey of India (SOI) is large. Contour
map of the city with at the most 5m contour interval should be obtained. If there is
no such map a survey may have to be done particularly of the area where sewers
have to be laid or pumping stations to be constructed.
3.4.3
Deviations in land use with respect to that shown in the Master Plan and
encroachments should be indicated in the map.
3.4.4
3.4.5
3.4.6
Thematic maps may be prepared to the extent feasible and considered useful for
the project.
3.5 Hydro-geological:
3.5.1
Meteorological data
3.5.2
Ground water depth and its seasonal fluctuation affecting construction, sewer
infiltration and structural design,
3.5.3
3.6.2
3.6.3
Ward-wise per capita water supply in lpcd- present and expected after works
under constructions and planned are completed.
3.6.4
Plan showing water supply works, existing and under construction and future
plans for augmentation of water supply in the town may be collected.
3.6.5
Brief description of water supply status of the town along with completion plans
of the existing works
3.6.6
A copy of the water supply master plan/major estimates prepared earlier should
be obtained.
Ward-wise arrangements in the households for the disposal of toilet waste water.
3.7.1.1
3.7.1.2
3.7.2
3.7.3
Out falls and drains / Sewers leading to the outfalls should be plotted on a
drainage map of the towns.
3.7.4
No. of drains carrying the domestic sewerage, polluting the water body
3.8.2
Actual field survey to be conducted, for at least one month during dry weather to
assess pollution load quantitatively and qualitatively. Actual present flows to be
measured at the point of outfall into the water body. The pollutants, BOD, COD,
Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Chlorides, Ph, temperature, colour, odour, total
suspended solids, volatile suspended solids and faecal coliforms are also to be
measured. The sample should be flow proportional and composited taken once a
week for diurnal variation on hourly basis. For this purpose, considering a four
week months, three samples to be taken on week days, whereas the fourth sample
to be taken on an off day i.e. Sunday.
3.9.2
Catchment areas of each nala to be marked on the city map showing ground
levels, so that populations contributing wastewater to the nala could be
ascertained.
3.13
Coastal Towns:
3.13.1 Water quality and discharge in case of coastal towns.
3.13.2 Additional data relating to tidal incursion and mangroves to be collected.
3.14
3.14.8.3
3.14.8.4
3.14.8.5
3.14.8.6
3.14.9
3.14.10 Plantation:
The plantation work may be planned in accordance with the guidelines given as
Annexure IV
3.15.1.2
3.15.1.3
The points where the industrial, hazardous and bio-medical wastes are
treated.
3.15.1.4
The points where the industrial, hazardous and bio-medical wastes are
disposed of.
3.15.1.5
The points where the industrial, hazardous and bio-medical wastes are
being mixed with the municipal wastes- effluents in sewers, solid
waste in MSW. The points should be shown in the city map.
3.15.1.6
Its quantity and quality at those points should also be obtained. The
information- quantity and quality- about different types of wastes such
as MSW, industrial hazardous and biomedical should be obtained in
disaggregated from separately for liquid and solid.
3.15.1.7
3.15.1.8
Number of hospitals, nursing homes and other units generating biomedical waste. They may be plotted on the map showing land
utilization.
3.15.1.9
3.15.2 The SPCB may be requested to review its performance and resources and if there
is need, prepare a plan to enhance its capacity to ensure effective control and
management of pollution in the town/city where the conservation measures are
proposed.
Type of Schemes: The system to improve the environment of the city may consist of
sub-systems or schemes that relate to
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
Crematoria
4.1.4
4.1.5
4.1.6
Watershed/Catchment Treatment:
4.1.7
4.1.8
4.1.9
System Design:
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
Sub-system alternatives for major components such as Sewage and MSW should
include the alternatives of Centralised Systems and Decentralised systems.
4.2.4
energy, other pros and cons, reliability and long term sustainability should also be
given appropriate weightages. On such an evaluation, the best option should be
selected.
4.2.4.1 The summary of the above analysis shall form an important component
of the draft DPR for public consultation before finalisation.
4.3
Design Criteria:
4.3.1
4.3.2
Sewage
4.3.1.1
It is not desirable for a town with piped water supply and flushing
system to discharge the sewage from the dwelling unit directly in to
street drain. If such a situation exists in a town or some of its parts
alternatives for good sanitation including low cost sanitation should be
worked out and what ever is practically feasible should be a part of the
plan.
4.3.1.2
Design Periods
Base yearThe year of expected commissioning of the project shall be taken as
the base year for design of various components of the projects. Design periods of
various components may be adopted as under:
Table:
S.No. Component
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
disposal
LCS
Crematoria
RFD
MSW
4.3.3
is economical.
Required as of base year
Required as per assessment
Required as per assessment
Requirement as per assessment
Design population
Design population is to be worked out for each zone on a critical appraisal of the
latest demographic data and projected population in the city master plan. New
colonies that may come up in future should also be catered for. It should be
ensured that the laws require the colonizer to provide conveyance and treatment
of all wastes before discharge in to municipal drain/sewer.
Sewers
Sewers shall be designed as per latest Manual on Sewerage and Sewage
Treatment, issued by the Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India
4.3.5
Interception factor
Generally 80% of water supply is expected to reach sewers. However to have a
correct assessment of the waste reaching sewers, actual flow measurements of
major drains be carried out for over a month. After knowing the contributory
population of the drains and water supply rate, sewage interception factor shall be
worked out.
4.3.6
Interception works
Nala tapping works shall be constructed on the course of a Nala, so as to intercept
the dry weather flow flowing through the nala, and divert it into the nearby sewer.
4.4
3 nos.
4 2 nos.
5 nos. 1 standby
4.5
The provision of land for STPs including sewage pumping station may be made as
follows:
S. No
1
2
3
4
Process
Activated Sludge/ Trickling filter
Aerated lagoon
Stabilisation pond
Agro-forestery (Karnal Technology)
U.A.S.B.
Land provision is to be made for the ultimate requirements in case of STPs, SPS and
SWM, but for the present requirement in case of crematoria, bating ghats etc.
Effluent Standards
S.
No.
1
2
3
Parameters
BOD (mg/l)
SS (mg/l)
Faecal coliform
<100
<200
Desirable
<30
<50
Desirable
1000
4.6
Max.
permissible
10000
1000
Max.
permissible
10000
Technology
Technology option should be based on the cost benefit analysis of various options to
achieve the desired standards and the most economic one selected.
Possibility of utilizing bioremediation techniques for lake conservation shall be
considered depending upon its feasibility.
4.7
Low cost sanitation: There may be schemes of the Government of India and the State
Governments both for supporting Community Toilets and individual toilets. Those
schemes should be integrated with the schemes of town:
4.7.1
Community Toilets
4.7.1.1 Guidelines given as Annexure II may be followed in this regard.
4.8
4.8.2
Crematoria
Improved Wood based crematoria have been provided in a large number of towns
under Ganga Action Plan on the plans developed by NRCD. These may be
adopted and may be modified as per local conditions, availability of land and
some other problems in the use of such crematoria constructed earlier were
encountered.
Electric crematoria have also have been constructed at some placaes under Ganga
Action Plan have faced the problem of power. These may, however, be provided
in big towns, where the availability of power & trained staff for maintenance in
ensured.
4.8.3
4.8.4
The data that needs to be collected is already given in Chapter III. A study of this
data will suggest the works, which need to be undertaken to prevent soil erosion,
which finally flows in to the waterbody causing many problems. The types of
works that may be required to be done include:
4.8.4.1
4.8.4.2
4.8.5
4.8.4.3
4.8.4.4
Institutional Strengthening
4.8.4.5
5.1
Operation and Maintenance in all its facets is the responsibility of the local body aided
and supported by State government. A firm commitment will be given by the local body
that it agrees to bear the entire cost of O & M. The State Government shall give an
undertaking that it will ensure that assets are properly operated and maintained and any
short fall in resources will be met by them. The agency for O & M of the assets created
will also be clearly mentioned in the DPR.
5.2
It is necessary to accurately assess the financial and other resources required for
effective and efficient O & M. The resources required and associated costs are:
5.3
5.4
5.2.1
Energy Electricity and diesel to be used in standby Generating Set- to meet the
contingency of electric failure.
5.2.2
Man Power,
5.2.3
Consumables
5.2.4
Inventory of Spares
5.2.5
5.2.6
Preventive maintenance
Monitoring
5.3.2
Evaluation
5.5
A detailed plan for raising the resources for Operation & Maintenance shall
become part of the project proposal.
5.6
The operation and maintenance manual of the various plants, structures, labs, etc. should
be prepared.
5.7
In case it is decided to carry out O & M departmentally, staff required for O & M of
sewage pumping stations, STP etc. may be adopted as per Annex II.
5.8
Timely availability of land for the facilities & assured uninterrupted power supply for
the electrical equipment shall be ensured for the chosen alternative system in consultation
with local bodies.
5.9
Revenue generation estimate from the sale/use of by-products of the STPs, garbage
utilization plants including recycling & resources recovery shall be a factor for
prioritising the best alternative.
5.10.1.2
5.10.1.3
methods,
5.10.1.4
5.10.1.5
5.10.1.6
5.10.1.7
5.10.1.8
Fines on Polluters
5.10.1.9
6.1
6.1.2
there is need for conservation programme and that they will benefit
from it.
There are costs involved in such programmes and part of the burden will
have to be borne by them,
The communities are effectively involved in all the stages of the project cycle
from conceptualisation, to preparation, to finalisation, to implementation and
finally O & M.
6.2
Hence Public Awareness & Public Participation should be a front-end activity of the
project unlike the present practice of it being the last priority.
6.3
6.4
Issues involved in the conservation of the water body need to be identified and the
programme will need to focus on them. The objective of the Awareness Plan will be
determined by the issues identified.
6.5
Agency that will plan, implement and coordinate the Awareness Campaign should be
identified. With a view to focus on issues relating to protection and improvement and
cleaning of rivers/lakes, a massive program of environment education and awareness is
imperative. Centre and states may launch this campaign through a program of volunteers
called NATIONAL GREEN VOLUNTEERS.
6.6
Detailed guidelines for Core and Non-core schemes are given as Annexure VI
7.2
Project planning,
7.1.2
Project preparation
7.1.3
Project implementation,
7.1.4
Monitoring evaluation
7.2.2
Social,
7.2.3
7.2.4
Institutional
7.2.5
Administrative,
7.2.6
Legal
7.3
Successful project management will need the manpower with diverse skills, physical and
financial resources to deal with all the aspects mentioned above in all the phases of the
project.
7.4
Human Resources Development will deal with appropriate skill development in the
organisations involved in the planning, design and management of the project. The main
activities are listed below:
7.4.1
7.4.2
7.4.3
Well staffed and equipped Engineering Institutions, which have an interest in the
subject, may be asked to develop training modules. They should be involved on a
long-term basis so that they develop expertise in the aspects of this programme.
They should be involved in various aspects and activities of the programme.
Departmental,
Project Management Agency
A combination of above
Institutional Issues:
8.2.1
8.2.2
8.2.2.1.3
8.2.2.2
Many times there is an overlap in the roles of several bodies with the
result that the efficiency with which the function should be performed
suffers. The state Government needs to resolve such overlaps. The role
of each institution involved needs to be very clearly specified.
8.2.2.3
CHAPTER IX : FINANCING
9.1
The National River Conservation Authority (NRCA) has decided that the Financing
pattern of schemes of the NRCD for the conservation of rivers and lakes will be as
follows:9.1.1
9.1.2
States and the local bodies to bear 30% of project cost of which Share of the
public shall be a minimum of 10%.
9.1.3
O & M shall be a part of the project and the costs thereon shall be borne entirely
by the state and the local bodies for which additional resources have to be
demonstrably raised and committed to O & M.
9.1.4
The Local Bodies may raise loans from Financial Institutions such as HUDCO to
contribute their share,
9.1.5
If for any reason such as delay, wrong design or estimation, omission of items,
inflation etc., there is cost overrun in any project, the central share in the total cost
will be limited to the ceiling amount approved by the CCEA. Balance, if any, is to
be borne by the respective state Government. It is, therefore, necessary to prepare
the DPR accurately after investigation and survey and taking all factors into
account that can influence the cost of the project.
9.2
The State Governments should make all efforts to obtain larger plan allocations for such
programmes.
9.3
The contribution of 10 % from the beneficiaries and stakeholders can be raised in one or
more of the following forms.
9.3.1
9.3.2
9.3.3
9.3.4
9.3.5
9.3.6
9.3.7
9.3.8
9.4
It will be seen that the Integrated Project will include cost elements, many of which will
not be financed by the NRCD. The NRCD will clarify which of the elements will be
financed by it and which ones not financed by it.
9.5
The DPR should state how the finance would be raised for those items in the DPR that
will not be considered for financing by the NRCD.
10.1 The improvements in the water body and the environment of the town will have to be
monitored and evaluated after the implementation of the project.
10.2 The conservation Programme is expected to yield results, which should be quantified in
the DPR to the extent, it is feasible to do so. Other results will have to be qualitative.
10.3 Depending upon the items of works taken up, a programmes of monitoring should be
developed and it should be assigned to a well-equipped laboratory in a University or the
SPCB. The expenses on the monitoring should be estimated and should form a part of the
funds required for O & M.
10.4 After the project has been fully implemented, it is necessary to evaluate the project.
Funds should be provided for this purpose also.
Land Acquisition
11.1.1.2
11.1.1.3
Sewage Treatment
11.1.1.4
11.1.1.5
Crematoria
11.1.1.6
11.1.1.7
11.1.1.8
11.1.1.9
11.2
11.2.3
11.2.4
There should be separate volumes for major items such as I & D, STPs, LCS
etc. In case I & D scheme becomes too large, DPRs may be prepared zone wise.
Intermediate pumping stations, if any shall form part of I & D scheme. The
main pumping station, which is the last pumping station before STP, shall form
part of STP scheme.
11.2.5
DPRs shall be prepared on computer. Along with hard copies, a copy of the
floppy/ disc shall be submitted to NRCD.
11.2.6
Salient features of the DPR should be given at the beginning of the DPR to
have an idea of the DPR at a glance.
11.2.7
11.2.8
Scheme-wise quarterly fund requirements from the local body, State and
Central Government should also be given.
11.2.9
The checklist given in Annexure VII contains important steps that should be taken in
prescribing the DPR. It may be filled up and enclosed with the DPR.
11.4 Completion Reports:
It should be borne is mind that after the completion of the works, completion reports will
have to be submitted in the formats given in Annexure VIII.
ANNEXURE I
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT THE XTH MEETING OF THE
NRCA MARCH2001 PM IN CHAIR.
1.
While river cleaning would need to be given a much higher priority, it is also essential
that resources are not spread thinly. The focus, therefore, has to be on large towns, which
are gross polluters,
2.
In case of works already completed, assets need to be maintained and also continuously
operated /utilised for which funds must be earmarked by the States. The states/ UTs must
meet the O & M costs which on an average is around 5% of the capital cost.
3.
A holistic and integrated approach shall be adopted by addressing not only river
pollution but also other components like internal sewerage, solid waste disposal, low cost
toilets etc.
4.
The cost of works shall be shared between the central and states/local bodies, public on
70: 30 basis. The public shall contribute not less that 10% of the cost.
5.
A detailed plan for recovery/ operation maintenance cost shall become part-of the project
proposal in future.
6.
7.
Approved works must be completed first and where states/UTs have not been responsive
enough and such works have been pending for more than two years because of non-action
by states, a committee of secretaries consisting of Secretary ministry of environment &
Forests, secretary finance, secretary planning Commission and chief secretary of the
concerned state shall review the necessity of such schemes.
8.
National lake conservation plan shall receive the same priority as the rivers.
9.
Mobilisation of resources/funds will need special attention. Plan outlays would need to
be enhanced substantially so that gap between fund requirements and outlay is bridged
10.
Coastal towns would get special attention because it has been observed that sewage, solid
waste, bio-medical waste and the like are dumped into sea. Prioritisation of coastal towns
for taking up such works may be done from the angle of mangroves, promotion of ecotourism, cultural and religious importance of the place and like.
11.
With a view to focus on issues relating to protection and improvement and cleaning of
rivers/lakes, a massive program of environment education and awareness is imperative.
Central and states to launch this campaign through a programme of volunteers called
National Green Volunteers.
ANNEXURE II
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF SCHEMES OF LOW
COST SANITATION (LCS)
1.
Community Toilets
In localities where all individual dwelling units do not have their own toilets, community
toilets should be constructed. 10,15 and 20 seated toilets may be provided depending
upon the space and number of users.
Type
10 seated
15 seated
20 seated
The above areas are proposed keeping in view the facility available for cleanliness,
hygienic condition and environment and user friendly.
2.
Sizes
For all types of LCS blocks, two urinal for gents, two bathrooms one each for ladies and
gents, one guardroom and one counter shall be provided.
The sizes may be adopted as under with a tolerance of 10%
S. NO.
1
2
3
3.
Component
Bath room
Guard room
Counter
Size (sq.m.)
1.2 x 1.5
3.0 x 3.0
3.0 x 1.2
WC Enclosure
Its size shall be 0.9 x 1.2 m (tolerance of 10%). Doorframes could be fabricated
out of pressed MS/ GI sheet or other cheaper material, which is locally available with size
0.75 x 1.8 m. Brass material shall not be used at any place.
Ordinary glazed tiles or mosaic may be provided upto 1 metre height skriting.
Floor shall be of P.C.C. Shutter of the door shall be 1.5 feet less than the height of the
frame. In the rear side, precast RCC jali may be used for proper vantilation.
4.
Water Supply
WCs shall be pour flush type. Water tap may be provided in WC enclosure
keeping in view the local requirement/ practice. The taps in WCs & Bathrooms shall be
self-closing type of CI material. Overhead storage tank should be provided. The
capacities of the OHT shall be as follows:
S.No.
1
2
3
5.
Type
10 seater
15 seater
20 seater
Maximum Capacity
4000 litres
6000 litres
8000 litres
Disposal System
The LCS units shall be provided with septic tank followed by soakpit. These units
shall be properly designed. However, if the sewer line exists near such units, it should be
directly connected to the sewer line.
If the sewer line is situated away from the LCS unit, a comparison between the
cost of sewer line and septic tank etc. should be carried out to adopt the least cost
solution.
6.
Bio Gas
At one or two locations, biogas generation package for 20 seater toilets shall be
prepared and tried for revenue generation.
7.
10.
Individual toilets
ANNEXURE III
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF SCHEMES OF SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT UNDER RIVER PLAN
A.
GARBAGAE DATA:
Per Capita generation, quality (physical and analysis), zone wise quantity generated in
respect of Municipal, Industrial/Hospital and Hazardous waste per day, present mode of
dumping (burning/scientific method), problem in sewer/drain due to chokage etc. have to
be elaborated.
HANDLING FACILITY:
Existing mode of collection, transportation and disposal of solid waste and effectiveness
in terms of equipment, manpower etc. has to be elaborated. The location of collection and
disposal sites has to be shown on map.
FUNDING:
Source of fund/assistance received by the Municipality for meeting the cost of personnel,
fuels and other operation and maintenance cost being incurred may be indicated.
Does the existing system have provision of minimising waste at source, segregation of
inert material, recycling, treatment, and scientific disposal & energy and revenue
generation? If so, are their any plans notified by the Authority and steps taken thereof?
This has to be elaborated.
6
B.
PROPOSED SYSTEM :
1.
Quantification :
Quantification of solid waste generation corresponding to design year has to be supported
with presents status in terms of per capita generation and other sources if anticipated any.
The exercise has to be carried out zone wise.
2.
Quality/Analysis of Wastes:
Composition of waste like plastic, street rubble, construction waste, glass, metal, wood
stone etc. and compostable material in terms of percentage has to mentioned. Report of
High Power Committee, Planning Commission, GOI may be referred for this. Analysis
for obtaining calorific value of garbage has also to be done. This is essential for planning
of utilisation of solid waste on mass scale.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Model followed by Ahmadabad municipality may be studied and if found feasible, may
be replicated.
Resources Recovery:
Provision may be made for resource recovery by ways of recycling, energy generation,
sale of manure and reclaiming the dumping site. A note on this delineating feasibility,
planning and marketing strategy has to be inserted in the DPR.
Privatization:
In order to have efficient management system, the entire system or a part of it may be
entrusted upon private parties. This could be done keeping in view the services of the
existing staff. A report on this has to be submitted after proper study. Attempts should at
least be made to privatise transportation of waste to the extent possible.
10
11
Land Cost
Provision for cost of land for filling purpose may be included in the estimate.
conservation plan. The rest will eventually be the responsibility of the state
Government/local authority.
ANNEXURE IV
GUIDE LINE FOR PLANTATION UNDER NATIONAL RIVER ACTION PLAN
Objectives
1.1
1.2
1.3
In the case of lakes to check erosion of the catchment and inflow of sediment into
the lake
Where to plant ?
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
A map of the areas proposed to be taken up under the project will form a part of
the project document
These are essentially to be avenue / aesthetic plantations and hence suitable local
flowering tree species in consultation with local people and with active
participation of NGOs who are working in that area may be selected.
3.2
Implementing agency
4.1
infrastructure, they may be given the first preference to take up works under these
guidelines.
4.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
Records to be maintained
The implementing agency will be required to meticulously maintain requisite documents
like plantation registers including treatment map, measurement books, accounts etc. It
will also diligently maintain every six months, the survival percentage of the plantations.
Evaluation
Works taken up will be monitored / evaluated by experts to be selected from the panel
maintained for the purpose in the Ministry. Visit of these evaluators will take place once
every year (November-January) to each project and assessment of work will basically be
done with reference to the calendar of operations submitted along with the project
proposal.
ANNEXURE V
Norms for Staff & Staff Quarters Required on Sewage Pumping Stations & STPs
1.
J.E.
Pump Mechanics
Electricians
Pump Operators
Beldars
Sweepers
Staff
Quarters
Required for Operating
Staff
Pump Operators
Installed
Capacity
150-300 HP
1
1
1x3
1x2
1x1
Type B
Beldars
Type
Pump Mechanics
Electricians
Total
Installed Capacity
>500 HP
1
1
1
1x3
2x3
1x1
1 Type B
2.
Installed
Capacity
300-500 HP
1
1
1
1x3
1x3
1x1
1 Type B
Type
1
Type
A
Type B
Type B
2
1
1
5
Staff
Types
10
mld
40
mld
80
mld
120
mld
A
B
B
C
4
2
1
-
4
4
1
1
6
4
1
1
8
6
1
1
C
D
B
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
of
staff
Qts.
Quarters Required
Beldars
Operators
Electrician class 1
Pump
mechanic/Fitters
class 1
J.E.
A.E.
Operators (Power
Plant)
Sub-total
Oxidation Pond
Beldars
Aerated Lagoons
Beldars
Operators
UASB Treatment
Plants
Operators
Staff
11+2
A
B
2
2
2
2
B
Types of staff Qts.
A
A
B
1+1
10
mld
1
1
1
B
C
D
-
1
1
-
Sweepers
Watchmen/Gatemen
Electrician cum
Mechanic
Chemists***
J.E.**
A.E.(Civil)
EE(Civil)
14+2
18+2
1+1
1+1
1+1
40 mld 80 mld 120
mld
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-
1
1
1
-
1
1
1
-
Type
A
B
Plinth Area
34.20 sq.m.
45.60 sq.m.
C
D
62.70 sq.m.
86.00 sq.m.
No staff quarters are necessary for the IPS and MPS, if the installed capacity is less than
150 HP.
The staffing pattern for STP has been taken as per the guidelines of the Expert
Committee set up by NRCD for the above purpose.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Number and type of quarters for different capacities any types of treatment plants have
been worked out taking into consideration the operating staff in shifts. Quarters have also
been proposed for minimum maintenance staff in large pumping stations and STPs.
Only a few supervisory staff at large STPs are to be considered for staff quarters at the
site of treatment plant.
The pay scales and type of accommodation are based as per norms laid down by the
Ministry of Urban Development.
If the land is not available at the site of MPS for construction of staff quarters, these
quarters can be constructed at the site of treatment plant.
Staff quarters are not to be treated as rent-free.
20% of the operating staff in shifts is to be provided quarters in the vicinity of STP.
States can adopt their own eligibility norms for different categories of staff, provided the
variations are not too large.
Designation
Ex Engineer
(Project Manager)
AE(E&M)Asstt.
Manager
AE(Civil)Astt.
Manager
JE(E&M)Junior
Manager
JE(Civil)Junior
Manager
Fitter(Mech)Ist Class
Electn, Ist class
Fitter, 2nd class
Electn, 2nd class
Gardener
Driver
Cleaner
Jr. Accountant
UDC, Senior Astt.
LDC/Typist Junior
Astt.
Peon
Jr. Steno
Chemist
Asst. Chemist
Lab Astt.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lab Attendant.
Sweeper
Welder cum
Balcksmith
Operators
Labour (Beldars)
1
1
-
2
1
-
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
-
2
1
-
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
-
2
1
-
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
-
1
1
-
1
2
-
1
2
-
1
1
-
1
1
-
1
2
-
12 16 19 19 12 16 19 19 8 8 12 12 1 1 4 4 4
28 44 54 73 28 44 53 72 21 28 48 52 11 20 36 50 10 14 27
ANNEXURE VI
1.
INTRODUCTION:
It appears to be a turning point in the philosophy and programmes of NRCD to think loudly
in terms of the importance and need of community awareness and community action for
ensuring the desired success to the non-core schemes of National River Conservation
Programme through peoples participation. Unfortunately, even after a huge expenditure of
thousands of millions of rupees, the out come of most of the activities undertaken to
implement the ambitious projects like Ganga and Yamuna Action Plan and now National
River Conservation Programme has been far below the expectation of the nation. There
may be different opinions of the casual factors responsible for such alarming situation. The
fact however, remains that much of the disappointing experience or poor performance of
the projects like these can be attributed to the fact that from the very beginning there has
not been any sincere or systematic effort to involve community at any stage of the
execution of the programme. The obvious result is that the general public for whom the
whole exercise was planned so ambitiously always remained to be an indifferent on-looker.
At times, the target beneficiaries contributed to the problem of river pollution because of
number of human factors. Although, they did not do it deliberately, yet the fact remains
that it was done because of the lack of proper awareness about the casual factors of river
pollutions and also the dangers of the hazards of polluted river water, which is gradually
turning into a slow poison. Hardly any meaningful effort has even been made to motivate
the process to contribute their share to the efforts of keeping rivers off pollution. For
example, number of hardware provisions were made to check the human casual factors
of river pollution but there was rarely any systematic effort to educate the masses on the
recommended practices for the proper use and maintenance of such facilities of toilet
complexes, bathing ghats, crematoria, river bank structures, sewage systems, etc. It is
shocking to note that not even ten percent of the total budgetary provision of NRCP has
ever been made on software aspects. The outcome has been the same as could be expected
under such conditions. It is heartening to note that NRCD has now realised the importance
of community awareness/peoples participation in general and software components of the
programme in particular. It may be pertinent to point out that the working of NRCP cannot
be improved unless at least twenty five percent of budget provision is made for software
programme. Some of the measures, which may be suggested to create meaningful
community awareness and ensure fruitful participation of the masses for the success of
National River Action Plan, are detailed below:
2.
Target Groups
2.1.1
2.1.2
Local NGOs,
2.1.3
2.1.4
Elite groups and organisations like Rotary Club, Lions club, Associations and
forums of writers and artists, etc.,
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8
2.1.9
2.2.1
Holding of locality wise meetings and group discussions with local influentials,
Whereby the extent of river pollution, the related physical and human factors, the
consequent health hazards and the possible remedial measures are highlighted
through the talks and technical presentations by the experts and social workers
(Action: Identified NGO of reputation).
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
Motivate the office bearers of trade unions and other professional organisations
like the teachers and students associated to win public support for their cause by
rendering some fruitful service to the society. While doing so they may give
highest priority to community health promotional measures like river pollution
control and conservation of the quality of river water (Action: NGO of
reputation).
2.2.9
Motivate local MLAs and MPs and leaders of political parties to participate
actively in the promotional efforts of community involvement for protecting
river against the hazards of pollution-an effort, which shall pay them abundantly
through the building of positive public opinions. They should also be motivated
to form local level all party organisations/ forums to promote the measures of
river pollution control. In addition, they should be motivated to take keen
interest in the proper utilisation of the funds provided for river pollution. In
addition, they should be persuaded to play effective liaison between the
government and the people to ensure the timely completion of different
programmes and activities undertaken by the Directorate of National River
Conservation Programme (Action: NGO having a sound background of linkages
with the legislative and political leaders).
2.2.10 Motivate leading persons representing local press and electronic media infact,
they need to be properly educated and encouraged to be conscious of their social
commitment and social obligations. They should also be convinced that socially
conscious media shall always be aptly recognised and enormously rewarded
through the creation of a sound base of enlightened clientele group which in the
long run will help them through the image building process. Accordingly, the
editors and correspondents of local press, the officers and key functionaries of
coverage to the aspect of river pollution control measures through the active
involvement of the people (Action: NGOs of repute having a sound organisation
infrastructure of public relations unit).
2.2.11 Awaken, educate and encourage the grassroot level functionaries belonging to
such departments of state govt. as local bodies like, public health, sewerage,
forestry, water supply, public works, electricity, industry, tourism etc. to take
special interest in the activities which are directly related to the aspect of river
pollution control. They should be particularly motivated to be more conscious
of their commitment and obligation to ensure the purity of river water so that
the future of the present and coming generations of the society and so also the
members of their own community is safe-guarded against the health hazards.
(Action: NGO having the background of specialised contribution to the area
concerned).
2.3
FOR
CORE SCHEMES
VIZ SEWERAGE
E
TREATMENT PLANTS, PUMPS, ETC.
2.3.1
NETWORK,
Target Groups :
2.3.1.1
Community at large,
2.3.1.2
2.3.1.3
2.3.1.4
2.3.1.5
2.3.1.6
NGOs,
2.3.1.7
SEWAG
2.3.2
2.3.1.8
2.3.1.9
2.3.1.10
Action Points
2.3.2.1
2.3.2.2
2.3.2.3
2.3.2.4
2.3.2.5
2.3.2.6
2.3.2.8
2.3.2.9
2.3.2.10
2.3.2.11
ANNEXURE VIII-A
COMPLETION REPORT
(General Abstract of Cost)
Certified (1)
(2)
(3)
Qty
As executed
Amt.
Item
Qty
Variation
Amt.
Saving
(+)
Excess
(-)
10
That there has been no material deviations from the sanctioned plans
and specifications other than those approved by the competent authority.
That the works have been completed as per specifications and completion
drawings enclosed
That the site has been cleared of all malba, rubbish and surplus
materials, contractors hutments and his materials etc.
Reasons
C
for
p
Variation e
q
&
a
s
E
11
1
ANNEXURE VIII-B
COMPLETION REPORT
Component/Sub-head:
As executed
Qty
Unit
Variation
Rate
Amt.
10
Saving
(+)
11
Exce
(-)
12
2.
3.
Principal Investigator:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Amount allowed to be carried forward to the next financial year vide letter no. and
date:
(Signature of
Principal Investigator)
(Signature of
Registrar/ Accounts Officer)
(Signature of Head
of the Organisation)
COMPETENT AUTHORITY
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS