Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Section of Orthodontics, Division of Associated Clinical Specialties, University of California, Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los
Angeles, CA; Private Practice of Orthodontics, Auburn, WA.
Address correspondence to Aaron D. Molen, DDS, MS, Molen
Orthodontics, 1110 Harvey Road, Auburn, WA 98002-4218.
E-mail DrAaron@3DOrthodontist.com
2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1073-8746/11/1701-0$30.00/0
doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.007
34
on the machine, and the software used to reconstruct the volume. Most CBCT systems use either
a flat panel detector or an image intensifier.
Flat-panel detectors look similar to the photostimulable phosphor plates used in digital radiology, whereas image intensifier units are conical in shape with a convex detector surface at the
base. Flat-panel detectors result in cylindricalshaped volumes versus the spherical-shaped volumes of image intensifiers. When measuring the
dimensions of flat-panel generated volumes the
height and diameter of the volume are reported
in centimeters. In general, the diameter of the
volumes is fixed, whereas the height can be adjusted by the technician. Some systems allow the
flat panel to be rotated 45 degrees, thereby inverting the height and diameter. However, when
measuring the dimensions of image intensifier
generated volumes the diameter of the spherical
volume is reported in inches as a single number.
The shape of the volume can also affect the
amount of anatomy captured by the scan. For example, an image intensifier generated spherical volume with a diameter of 5 cm would have a volume of
65 cm3, whereas a flat panelgenerated cylindrical
volume with a height and width of 5 cm would have
a larger volume of 98 cm3. The increased volume
captured by cylindrical flat panel systems results from
Figure 1. Blue shading in the online version represents a cylindrical-shaped FOV and the red in the
online version represents a spherical-shaped FOV.
(Color version of figure is available online.)
35
36
Molen
imum distance between two distinguishable objects. Though often associated with voxel size,
they are not the same. The voxel size represents
the dimensions of the volume element into
which a volume is being subdivided and is usually measured in millimeters or microns. Each
voxel is assigned a value representing the density
of the object contained within its boundaries as
determined by the attenuation of the photons
passing through it. In a process called volume
averaging, if the objects contained within a single voxel differ in density then the average density of the voxels contents will be used. Therefore, it stands to reason that the use of smaller
voxel sizes will allow the visualization of smaller
variations in density. However, this does not
translate directly to spatial resolution. Noise
caused by scatter radiation,6 volume averaging,7
and artifacts can reduce a scans spatial resolution. In other words, a scan acquired with the
use of 0.3 mm voxels will not result in a spatial
resolution of 0.3 mm.8
Because voxel size does not equal spatial resolution, it is impossible to compare two CBCT
systems by voxel size alone with the reasoning
that the resolution is the same. Instead, the ideal
way to compare the spatial resolution of CBCT
systems is by the use of a line pair phantom (Fig
2). Line pair phantoms are imbedded with metallic strips set at ever decreasing distances from
each other. The point at which the user can no
and take up less office space than supine systems. It is also advisable to have the patient close
their eyes while performing the scan to help
them resist the urge to follow the rotating arm
with their eyes and head.
Another feature that allows for minimizing
the risk of patient movement is adjustable scan
times. Some systems allow adjustment of the
length of the scan from a short scan, less than 10
seconds, to scans longer than 30 seconds. The
advantage of longer scans is that more data, or
frames, are acquired by the scanner which results in better contrast and spatial resolution.
Inversely, shorter scans acquire fewer frames but
limit the amount of time in which the patient
may move. For orthodontic uses the image quality found in shorter scans is generally sufficient
for diagnosis and will reduce the risk of movement artifacts.
Image quality is also affected by the gray scale
bit depth of the CBCT system being used. Current CBCT systems range anywhere between 12
and 16-bit gray scale. Because the human eye
can only see up to 10-bit gray scale and computer monitors are only available in 8- or 10-bit
gray scale some would assume that it would be of
little worth to exceed these thresholds.10 However, this approach fails to take into account that
the reconstruction software uses the increased
bit depth to improve its primary and secondary
reconstructions, thereby resulting in a cleaner
and more defined volume. Most software also
allows the clinician to change the values of gray
scale displayed on the screen using a process referred to as window and leveling.11 By scrolling
through the various values of gray captured in the
scan the clinician can better visualize the volume.
In essence, the software allows use of the additional shades of gray captured by the scan despite
the limitations of the eyes and computer monitors.
Certain CBCT systems allow the clinician to
take conventional 2-dimensional (2D) digital radiographs in lieu of a full CBCT scan. CBCT
systems providing this feature can be divided
into two classes: single-detector and multipledetector. Single-detector systems use the same
detector to acquire either the CBCT scan or the
2D digital radiograph, but not both simultaneously. This configuration allows a more compact set-up with a smaller overall footprint. Multiple-detector systems use an additional detector
located on another arm to capture 2D radio-
37
38
Molen
References
1. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH: Bolton
Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth. Saint
Louis, Mosby, 1975