Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Capitulum 1
Chapter 1
Capitulum 2
Chapter 2
Capitulum 3
Chapter 3
alone.
Master I have already shown you many of
their examples, namely that the apostles
were the authors of the creed, that blessed
Peter was bishop of Rome, that blessed
Peter's see was transferred from Antioch to
Rome, and that the bishops of Rome
succeeded blessed Peter. They also cite
another example, concerning the primacy of
the Roman church, of which no mention is
made in divine scripture because, although
sacred scripture speaks expressly about the
primacy of blessed Peter, it is nevertheless
not found in that scripture that blessed Peter
ruled the Roman church, and so nothing can
be shown about the primacy of the Roman
church from that scripture alone, and yet we
ought to hold firmly that the Roman church
has primacy over all other churches.
Student Pass over the primacy of the
church of Rome because I will present you
with some questions about it later. But tell
me if those who make this assertion base
themselves on any other argument.
Master They try to fortify themselves with
still other arguments. Their third argument
is this. The teaching of the apostles should
not be held in less reverence and honour
than their canons and statutes; but the
canons and statutes of the apostles, either
those they collected in their writings or
those they only orally ordered to be
preserved, should be firmly preserved;
therefore all the truths which the apostles
taught in writing or orally should be
considered as absolutely true. However, the
apostles taught very many things which
they did not leave in their writings;
therefore some truths which are not found
in the canonical scriptures should be
considered absolutely true. Consequently, it
is necessary to agree with these and to
adhere most surely to them.
A fourth argument of theirs is this. The
universal church can not err, as the Truth
himself attests when he says to the apostles
in the last chapter of Matthew [28:20], "I
demonstratively.
Master For the opinion that I regard as true
I bring forward reasons that are sometimes
demonstrative, sometimes only probable,
sometimes indeed only plausible, in order to
exercise, test or try other people.
Capitulum 4
Chapter 4
the saints.
Student You have proved so clearly of
books by saints that they do not have to be
approved in their entirety that I can not
disagree. It seems to follow from this that
no authority remains in them because, just
as with instruments so also with writings,
whichever of them is found to be partly
false is wholly rejected, or at least rendered
suspect. Hence Augustine even asserts
about the sacred scriptures, as we find in
dist. 9, c. Si ad scripturas [col.17], that if
even dutiful falsehoods be admitted to be in
them nothing authoritative will remain in
them. Tell me, therefore, how they reply to
what we clearly read in dist. 15 about the
approval of the works of saints, among
which are certainly numbered the works of
Cyprian, Augustine and Jerome.
Master They say that not all the works of
saints, in respect of everything contained in
them, have been approved by the church.
For it is certain that many things opposed to
the truth are found in the books of blessed
Augustine and that he himself in fact later
retracted these, and so they should not be
approved. And just as it is with blessed
Augustine's books, so it is also with the
books of many other saints, that they are not
approved in their totality. Nevertheless, all
the books of the saints of whom mention is
made in the aforesaid distinction are
approved with respect to everything which
is corrected neither by the author nor by
others.
Student In that way it would be permissible
to approve the books of any heretics at all,
because it would be permissible to approve
everything in their books in so far as it had
not been corrected by catholics. For it is
permissible to approve every truth.
Master They say that there is no analogy
between the books of heretics and the books
of saints, because in the books of heretics it
is chiefly falsehoods that are investigated
and asserted, while there are few truths
incorporated in them. But in the books of
Capitulum 5
Chapter 5
Capitulum 6
Chapter 6
WHAT IS A HERESY?
Magister Quidam diffiniunt vel describunt
haeresim dicentes quod haeresis est dogma
falsum fidei contrarium orthodoxae. In qua
descriptione loco generis ponitur dogma
falsum, quia omnis haeresis est dogma
falsum sed non omne dogma falsum debet
haeresis reputari. Quod enim omnis haeresis
sit dogma falsum beatus Hieronymus, ut
habetur 24, q. 3, c. Inter haeresim, testatur
aperte dicens, "Haeresis perversum dogma
habet." Dogma autem perversum est dogma
falsum; haeresis ergo est falsum dogma. Sed
non omne dogma falsum est haeresis. Nam
secundum Augustinum in Enchiridion in
multis rebus errare nullum aut minimum est
peccatum; sed haeresis sicut infidelitas
gravissimum est peccatum. Ergo non omnis
error est haeresis. Ex quo concluditur quod
non omne dogma falsum est haeresis cum
omnis error dogma falsum sit censendum.
Dogma ergo falsum in descriptione haeresis
Capitulum 7
Chapter 7
Capitulum 8
Chapter 8
Capitulum 9
Chapter 9
Capitulum 10
Chapter 10
Capitulum 11
Chapter 11
Capitulum 12
Chapter 12
Capitulum 13
Chapter 13
Capitulum 14
Chapter 14
Capitulum 15
Chapter 15
Capitulum 16
Chapter 16