Author's personal copy

Cellulose
studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength
additive. Cellulose 15(2):303314. doi:10.1007/s10570007-9167-3
Celzard A, Mareche JF, Payot F (2000) Simple method for
characterizing synthetic graphite powders. J Phys D Appl
Phys 33(12):1556
Celzard A, Fierro V, Pizzi A (2008) Flocculation of cellulose
fibre suspensions: the contribution of percolation and
effective-medium theories. Cellulose 15(6):803814. doi:
10.1007/s10570-008-9229-1
Celzard A, Fierro V, Kerekes R (2009) Flocculation of cellulose
fibres: new comparison of crowding factor with percolation
and effective-medium theories. Cellulose 16(6):983987.
doi:10.1007/s10570-009-9314-0
Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM (2006) The
future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical
applications. Biomacromolecules 8(1):112. doi:10.1021/
bm060620d
Dalpke B, Kerekes RJ (2005) The influence of fibre properties
on the apparent yield stress of flocculated pulp suspensions.
J Pulp Pap Sci 31(1):3943
Derakhshandeh B, Kerekes RJ, Hatzikiriakos SG, Bennington
CPJ (2011) Rheology of pulp fibre suspensions: a critical
review. Chem Eng Sci 66(15):34603470. doi:10.1016/
j.ces.2011.04.017
Dufresne A, Dupeyre D, Vignon MR (2000) Cellulose microfibrils from potato tuber cells: processing and characterization of starch-cellulose microfibril composites. J Appl
Polym Sci 76(14):20802092
Dzuy NQ, Boger DV (1985) Direct yield stress measurement
with the vane method. J Rheol 29(3):335347
Eichhorn S, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich N, Capadona
J, Rowan S, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K,
Nogi M, Nakagaito A, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight
A, Bismarck A, Berglund L, Peijs T (2010) Review: current
international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45(1):133. doi:10.1007/s10853009-3874-0
Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindstrom T, Nishino
T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness.
Biomacromolecules 9(6):15791585. doi:10.1021/bm800
038n
Ishii D, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Viscoelastic evaluation of
average length of cellulose nanofibers prepared by
TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 12(3):
548550. doi:10.1021/bm1013876
Jakob HF, Fengel D, Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1995) The elementary cellulose fibril in picea abies: comparison of
transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray
scattering, and wide-angle X-ray scattering results. Macromolecules 28(26):87828787. doi:10.1021/ma00130
a010
Janarthanan S, Sain M (2006) Isolation of cellulose microfibrils
an enzymathic approach. Bioresources 1(2):176188
Karppinen A, Vesterinen A-H, Saarinen T, Pietikainen P, Seppala J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the
rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose.
Cellulose 18(6):13811390. doi:10.1007/s10570-0119597-9

123

Kerekes RJ, Schell CJ (1992) Characterization of fibre flocculation regimes by a crowding factor. J Pulp Pap Sci 18(1):
J32J38
Kerekes RJ, Soszynski RM, Tam Doo PA (1985) The flocculation of pulp fibres. In: Proceedings of the 8th fundamental
research symposium, Oxford, England. Mechanical Engineering Publications, pp 265310
Kropholler HW, Sampson WW (2001) The effect of fibre length
distribution on suspension crowding. J Pulp Pap Sci
27(09):301305
Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological
properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15(3):425433
Liddel PV, Boger DV (1996) Yield stress measurements with
the vane. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 63(23):235261. doi:
10.1016/0377-0257(95)01421-7
Malcolm Brown R Jr, Saxena IM, Kudlicka K (1996) Cellulose
biosynthesis in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci
1(5):149156. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80050-1
Martinez DM, Buckley K, Jivan S, Lindstrom A, Thiruvengadaswamy R, Olson JA, Ruth TJ, Kerekes RJ (2001)
Characterizing the mobility of papermaking fibres during
sedimentation. In: Baker CF (ed) The science of papermaking, transactions of the 12th fundamental research
symposium, Oxford. The Pulp and Paper Fundamental
Research Society, Bury, Lancaster, UK, pp 225254
Mosse WKJ, Boger DV, Garnier G (2012a) Avoiding slip in
pulp suspension rheometry. J Rheol 56(6):15171533
Mosse WKJ, Boger DV, Simon GP, Garnier G (2012b) Effect of
cationic polyacrylamides on the interactions between cellulose fibers. Langmuir 28(7):36413649. doi:10.1021/
la2049579
Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically
transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21(16):
15951598. doi:10.1002/adma.200803174
Perkins EL, Batchelor WJ (2012) Water interaction in paper
cellulose fibres as investigated by NMR pulsed field gradient. Carbohydr Polym 87:361367. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.
2011.07.065
Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new
nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3):
459494. doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y
Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int 47(3):291294. doi:
10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199811)47:3\291:aid-pi11[3.0.
co;2-1
Varanasi S, Batchelor W (2013) Rapid preparation of cellulose
nanofibre sheet. Cellulose 20(1):211215. doi:10.1007/
s10570-012-9794-1
Varanasi S, Chiam HH, Batchelor WJ (2012) Application and
interpretation of zero and short-span testing on nanofibre
sheet materials. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27(2):343352
Xu J, Chatterjee S, Koelling KW, Wang Y, Bechtel SE (2005)
Shear and extensional rheology of carbon nanofiber suspensions. Rheol Acta 44(6):537562. doi:10.1007/
s00397-005-0436-5
Zhang L, Batchelor W, Varanasi S, Tsuzuki T, Wang X (2012)
Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming
through filtration. Cellulose 19(2):561574. doi:10.1007/
s10570-011-9641-9