Sie sind auf Seite 1von 15

Sample of formal report

Portable Computer Use at Client Sites


Prepared for Freda Smith, general manager
the name and position of the person who authorized the report

by Belinda Gibson, training coordinator


the name and position of the person who prepared the report

March, 1998
the report completion date

All Purpose Training Company


the name of the company

MEMORANDUM
To: Belinda Gibson, Training Coordinator
From: Freda Smith, General Manager
Subbject: Portable Computers

Date: January 29 2003

To make the most of the technologies we discussed the other day to provide a quality
service to our customers, it is essential that our training staff be equipped with portable
computers which can be used at client sites.
Over the next couple of weeks, please investigate the portable computers which would
be most appropriate for our staff, and present your findings in the form of a formal
management report. The selected machine needs to be compatible with the Windows
software we are currently using. Other factors which should be considered when
comparing the brands and models include:

Initial cost;
Weight and size;
Screen size;
Clarity of the screen image;
RAM and hard disk size;
Speed of the CPU;
Battery capability; and
The availability of on-going service agreements and warranties.

With our training staff so often out at client sites, it would be useful if the machines also
had modern facilities to enable staff to access their email.
Please pass the report to me by the end of the month so I can read it over before
discussing your recommendations with the equipment committee. Let me know if you
have any questions.
Freda

MEMORANDUM
To: Freda Smith, General Manager
From: Belinda Gibson, Training Coordinator
Subject : Portable Computers
Date: March 26 2003

The opening sentence should remind the client of the subject and date of the
Memo of Authorisation. This sentence should read:
Here is the report you requested on the use of portable computers for our training staff
to use at client sites.

This sentence briefly states what was done. The past simple tense is used here to
describe completed actions.
Two portable computers were reviewed for this report: the Micro-pro 8500 Series and
the Hewlett Packard 3000CTX model 5/233, both suitable for business purposes.
This sentence briefly states what has been done. The present perfect tense is
used here to describe actions which have a present impact. The analysis will lead
to a choice of computer.
The report has analysed standard features on both computers, taking your
specifications into consideration.

This paragraph expresses confidence in the future benefits of portable


computers. It adds a positive note to the memo.
I am confident that with the use of portable computers our training staff will produce a
higher standard of training presentations.
I would be happy to assist with the implementation of the computers for our training staff
to use at future courses.
Belinda Gibso

Table of contents

Memo of authorisation

Memo of transmittal

Ii

Table of contents
List of tables

Iv

Executive summary

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose
1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope

1.3 Method

1.4 Limitations

1.5 Assumptions

1.6 Background

2 Findings

2.1 Micro-pro 8500 Series

2.2 Hewlett Packard 3000CTX


5/233

3 Discussion

3.1 Comparison of computers

3.2 Initial cost

3.3 Weight and size

3.4 Screen size

3.5 Clarity of screen image

3.6 RAM and hard disk size

3.7 Speed of the CPU

3.8 Battery capability

3.9 Service agreements and


warranties

4 Conclusion

5 Recommendations and
implementation

References

List of tables
Table 1: Comparison of two portable computers

Executive summary
The opening sentence contains a statement of purpose, which is expressed in the
past tense.
The purpose of this report was to analyse two portable computers and recommend a
suitable machine for training staff to use at client sites.
This sentence gives a brief description of what has been done in this report. The
present perfect tense is used here to describe actions which have a present
impact. The analysis has led to a choice of computer..
This report has considered two machines suitable for corporate use that can
accommodate modern facilities such as e-mail, video conferencing and assist staff with
training courses.

A summary of the findings is presented in the next two paragraphs.


Note that information included in the executive summary is not usually referenced since
the source has been acknowledged in the body of the report.
The Hewlett Packard Omnibook 3000CTX model 5/233 is a well made portable
computer with a good size screen and keyboard. For the price of this model you would
expect to see more memory, a CD drive and a Windows based power management set
up. (Australian PC Authority, April 1998, 'PCs and Notebooks - Reviews', p.82)
Like the Hewlett Packard model the Micro-pro 8500 Series has a good size screen and
keyboard but also comes witha numeric pad. This machine is ideal for the business user
who wants usability, comfort and performance. (Australian PC Authority, April 1998,
'PCs and Notebooks - Reviews' , p.81)

A recommendation is presented in the final sentence.


After taking both machines into consideration, it is recommended that the Micro-pro
8500 Series would be the most suitable computer due to its value for money, durability
and standard features.

1 Introduction
The Introduction provides essential background information, including why the
study or project was undertaken and what methods were used to gather the
information. The sections required in the introduction vary, depending on the
type of report and the department to which you belong.

1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this report was to analyse two portable computers and recommend a
suitable machine for our training staff to use at client locations.
Scope: This tells the reader the extent of the research. Here, two portable
computers were investigated and four features were considered.

1.2 Scope
While investigating these two computers it was important to consider their suitability for
corporate use, standard features, optional benefits and warranties.

Method: This describes how the information was gathered. The student consulted
a computer journal and contacted individual companies for more detailed
information.

1.3 Method
The information used in this report was collected by consulting an independent review
by the Australian PC Authority magazine and contacting the individual companies for
additional information on the technical specifications and warranties on the machines.

Limitations: This tells the reader what the researcher was not able to do, due to
lack of time and resources. The student has pointed to unavailability of
information as a limiting factor.

1.4 Limitations

Local computer stores did not stock either machine.


Additional information difficult to locate.
Software packages included with the machine not specified.

Background: This is closely related to the Purpose. It may include information


about the company for whom the report has been prepared and the factors
leading to the need for the report.

1.6 Background
The first paragraph of this section briefly sets the scene, pointing to the company's
plans for expansion.
The All Purpose Training Company is a well respected supplier of quality executive
training courses for the business community. The All Purpose Training Company has
statewide representation with plans to expand interstate within the next 12 months.

The second paragraph explains the new requirements which have made this report
necessary.
All Purpose Training Company has a demand to supply new clients with numerous
training courses. With such demands it is crucial that training staff can have computer
access for training presentations and be able to complete day to day operations while
mobile

2. Findings
The Findings section presents the basic facts with a minimum of commentary.
The implications of these facts are examined in the Discussion section.
Table form is another useful way to present comparative findings in a report.

2.1 Micro-pro 8500 Series


When using the Harvard or Author-Date system of referencing, only the author,
date, and page number should be included. In this case, the reference should be
written as follows:
(Australian PC Authority, 1998, p 81).
In this example, the author is an organisation. Note that the full stop should be
placed after the reference, not before.

Cost: $7895 RRP


Weight: 4.5 Kg
Size: (W x D x H) 357 x 275 x 50mm
Screen size: 15.1"
Clarity of screen image: Resolution could be higher, set at 1,024 x 768 you can
see the pixels, but very easy on your eyes. (Australian PC Authority, April 1998,
'PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81)
RAM: 64 Mb, RAM can be raised to a maximum 128Mb for $1140
Disk Drive: CD-ROM and 3.5" FDD
Speed of the CPU: Pentium processor
Battery capabilities: Lithium-ion battery, smart battery option available. Lithiumion battery lasts 2.5 hours without smart battery upgrade. (Australian PC
Authority, April 1998, 'PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81)
Service agreements and warranties: Two year parts and labour warranty

2.2 Hewlett Packard 3000CTX 5/233


When reference is made to a personal communication, the surname of the person
concerned should be included and the reference presented as follows:
(Smith, S. 1998, pers. comm., 7 May)

Cost: $8245 RRP


Weight: 3.1 Kg
Size: (W x D x H) 304 x 238 x 47mm
Screen size: 13.3"

Clarity of screen image: Resolution is set at 1,024 x 768. Reasonably easy to


read... with normal working conditions. (Australian PC Authority, April 1998,
'PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81)
RAM: 16Mb, upgrade available, $242 for 16Mb.
Disk drives: 3.5" FDD, CD-ROM available for $570
Speed of the CPU: Pentium processor
Battery capabilities: - 2.5 hours from a lithium-ion battery
Service agreements and warranties: All Hewlett Packard Omnibooks come with a
3 year parts and labour warranty. (Stephen, 7/5/1998, Telephone Interview,
Customer Service Officer, Hewlett Packard Information Centre, Hewlett
Packard)

The Discussion section comments on the significance of the Findings in


relation to the research question.

3 Discussion

3.1 Comparison of computers


The following table summarises the important points of comparison between the
two portable computers - Hewlett Packard Omnibook and Micropro 8500
Series.
Table 1: Comparison of two portable computers
Hewlett Packard Omnibook

Micropro 8500 Series

Initial cost

$8245

$7895

Weight

3.1 Kg

4.5 Kg

Size (Dimensions WxDxH) 304 x 238 x 47mm

357 x 275 x 50mm

Screen Size

13.3"

15.1"

RAM

16 Mb

64 Mb

2.5 Hours

2.5 Hours

3 Years

2 Years

Battery Time
Warranty Period

In sections 3.2 - 3.9, the student discusses the differences between the
two models and points to their relative advantages and disadvantages.

The comparison is based on the eight criteria listed in the Findings


section.

3.2 Initial cost

3.3 Weight and size

3.4 Screen size

There is a RRP difference between the two computers of $350. In order to have
the computers ready for staff use, upgraded memory size would be required on
the Hewlett Packard model.
The Micro-pro computer weighs an extra 1.4 Kg. This is substantially heavier,
but the Micro-pro is a larger machine with each dimension larger than the
Hewlett Packard computer. Micro-pro measures 53W x 37D x 3H mm larger.
There is a notable gap between screen sizes. Micro-pro has a 14.1 inch screen
compared with Hewlett Packards 13.3 inch screen. When using over long
periods a larger screen is preferred to avoid eye strain.

3.5 Clarity of screen image

3.6 RAM and hard disk size

The resolution on both machines is set a 1,024 x 768. Pixels can be seen on
the Micro-pro model, while the Omnibook is reasonably easy to read.
(Australian PC Authority, April 1998, PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81 - 82)

This is a report, not a personal letter, and the word 'you' is not appropriate
to the formal tone you need here. Change this phrase to "will cost $242"
Again, to maintain a formal tone, better not to use 'you' - use the passive
instead: "for the Omnibook this must be bought as an extra, for a cost of
$570."

RAM between the two machines varies greatly. The Australian PC Authority
states that the Micro-pro comes with 64 Mb of RAM standard, with an option of
buying the maximum 128 Mb for $1140. They also state Hewlett Packards
Omnibook comes with 16 Mb RAM, but as most computer applications require
32 Mb, this extra memory will cost you $242. Both machines come with a
standard 3.5" FDD. Only the Micro-pro machine comes with a CD-ROM drive,
you must buy this as an extra for the Omnibook for a cost of $570. (Australian
PC Authority, April 1998, PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81- 82)

3.7 Speed of the CPU


With 32 Mb of RAM fitted the Omnibook is one of the fastest portable
computers the Australian PC Authority magazine has ever seen, They also

found that with 64 Mb RAM the Micro-pro was not exceptionally quick but for
word processing and other office tasks it was quite acceptable.

3.8 Battery capability


Both machines come with a standard lithium-ion battery which can support the
computers for up to 2.5 hours. The computers come with power management
tools that will save battery power. A smart battery option is available on the
Micro-pro for $60. (Australian PC Authority, April 1998, PCs and Notebooks Reviews, p. 81)

3.9 Service agreements and warranties


Micro-pro supplies their clients with a two year part and labour warranty, while
Hewlett Packard supplies a three year parts and labour warranty. It is assumed
that when the machines are purchased a service agreement will be negotiated
with the option to extend the warranty.

4. Conclusion

This conclusion begins with a general statement summing up the Findings.


After investigating the Hewlett Packard Omnibook 3000CTX 5/233 and the Micro-pro
8500 Series portable computers, it was found that both models are suitable for
corporate use and would meet All Purpose Training Company requirements.

The next two paragraphs refer briefly to the requirements stated in the Memo of
Authorisation.
It is important to consider the long term benefits to the company when considering
which computer was best suited. Apart from initial purchasing expenses, warranty,
speed, size and memory were some factors which have been taken into account.
Software suitability was also considered.
The computers had to be easily adaptable for new technology such as e-mail, video
conferencing and presentation aids, for future company requirements.

The final paragraph states a preference for one of the computers.

Both computers are distinct from each other and, although both companies have the
corporate user in mind, Micro-pro appears to be offering an exceptional package

5. Recommendations and implementation


The findings and conclusion in this report support the following recommendations:

The recommendation placed first is regarded as the most important.


This should be rephrased as ' should be purchased'. The same comment applies
to Recommendation 2. In a list such as this all items should be parallel in
grammatical structure.
.
This should be rephrased as ' Staff could have the option of ...' to match the
grammatical structure of the other item in Recommendation 5.
1. The Micro-pro 8500 Series portable computer is purchased at a rate of one
computer per training staff member.
2. The smart battery option is purchased with each computer; this will assist with
heavy workloads and long training programs.
3. Staff must have e-mail access on their computers to enable them to be in contact
with the company.
4. All Purpose Training Company should negotiate price, warranty and on going
service agreements with Micro-pro direct.
5. To reduce company long term expenses:
o The company could investigate the viability of staff leasing the computers
o A staff option of buying the computers for personal use after the warranty
period expires.
6. Computers should be available to staff after a maximum of 6 weeks.

References
The Reference List includes all sources cited in the report. It should be on a
separate page.

Comments
This reference list requires a number of revisions in order for it to conform to
appropriate style conventions:

When using the Harvard or Author-Date system of referencing, references


should be listed in alphabetical order according to author surname. This
applies whether the author is a person or an organisation.

References 5, 6, and 7 are sources consulted for style conventions in


report writing. As they do not relate to the content of the report, they
should not be included in the Reference List.

When using the Harvard or Author-Date system of referencing, entries in a


list of references are not numbered.

With journals or periodicals (including magazines), an issue number or


identifier, a volume number if applicable, and the page numbers of the
article are included.
These details follow the name of the publication, and are separated by
commas.

Personal communications such as those listed as Numbers 3 and 4 are not


usually included in the list of references, but if it is considered important
to include this information, full names should be used.

References
1. Australian PC Authority, April 1998, PCs and Notebooks - Reviews, p. 81 - 82.
2. Micro-pro, 1998, 8500 Series Brochure, Micro-pro Computer (Imports) Pty Ltd,
Melbourne, Australia.
3. Gray, K. 1998, Director, Turnstone Technologies Pty Ltd, Australia.
4. Stephen, 1998, Customer Service Officer, Hewlett Packard Information Centre,
Hewlett Packard, Australia.
5. Guffey, M. 1997, Business Communication: Process and Product, South Western College Publishing, Ohio, USA.
6. Kimberly, N. and Cotesta, P, 1998, Student Q Manual, Faculty of Business and
Economics, Monash University, Caulfield, Australia.
7. Distance Education Centre, 1998, Business Communication Subject Guide,
Monash University, Churchill, Australia.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen