Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Application of Microuidics
Technology in Bioanalysis
B. Liu1 , Y. Deng1 2 , B. B. Qin1 , and Z. Y. Li1
1
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering,
Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P.R. China
2
Hunan Key Laboratory of Green Packaging and Application of Biological Nanotechnology,
Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412008, China
Microuidics technology which includes continuous-ow microuidics technology and digital microuidics technology is widely used in bioassays today. It holds high promise to facilitate the progress of bioassay by enabling
miniaturization and upgrading of current biological research tools due to its advantages such as low sample
consumption, reduced analysis time, high-throughput and compatible sizes with most biological samples. In this
article, we describe the recent applications of microuidics in biological researches at the molecular and cellular
levels, including their implementation, and associated design issues. Although the maturity of microuidics is
not favoured in some reviews about the microuidics technology, we still predict that the future is bright for this
Delivered by Ingenta to:
promising technology at the last section.
Guest User
IP : 203.113.130.216
Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:56:53
1. INTRODUCTION
Microuidics technologies can be divided into two classes:
continuous-ow microuidics technology and digital microuidics technology. Traditional (continuous-ow) microuidics
technologies are based on the continuous ow of liquid through
microfabricated channels.1 Continuous-ow systems are inherently difcult to integrate because the parameters that govern
ow eld (e.g., pressure, uid resistance, electric eld strength)
vary along the ow-path, making the ow at any location dependent upon the properties of the entire system.
The concept of digital microuidics (DMF) arose in the
late 1990s and involves the manipulation of discrete volumes of liquids on a surface. Manipulation of droplets can
occur through various mechanisms, including electrowetting,2
dielectrophoresis,3 thermocapillary transport4 and surface acoustic wave transport.5 In the early 2000s, this technology was popularized by Fair and his coworkers6 and Kim and his coworkers7
at Duke and UCLA, respectively.
The microuidics technique was explained as being a phenomenon driven by surface tension, and was called electrowetting or electrowetting on-dielectric (EWOD). A detailed
review of electrowetting basics can be found in the work of
Mugele.8 In addition, work on simulation and modeling of
droplet-based electrowetting has been reported by Biddut and
Homayoun Najjaran.9
150
Compared to traditional biochips, microuidic biochips platform is under software-driven electronic control, eliminating the
need for mechanical tubes, pumps, and valves. Moreover, because
each droplet can be controlled independently, these digital
systems also have dynamic recongurability, whereby groups
of cells in a microuidic array can be recongured to change
their functionality during the concurrent execution of a set of
bioassays.
The advent of microuidic systems has revolutionized
the methodology for biological researches.10 Applications of
microuidic chips in biology are growing fast. In this article, the
recent applications of microuidic chips in biological researches
at the molecular and cellular levels are overviewed from the perspective of biology. As the next-generation platform, microuidic
chips will certainly open up new avenues for high-throughput
biological analysis, facilitating the understanding of biology at
the molecule-level.
doi:10.1166/asl.2011.1202
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE
cytometers which are routinely utilized for analyzing the physical and chemical properties of biological cells require a high
amount of reagent for analysis and furthermore are both bulky
and expensive and require trained personnel for operation and
maintenance.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
heater. Microheaters and suspended biocompatible microbridge
were integrated on a chip in which yeast-cell immobilization can
be performed by gelation of a PNIPAAm solution.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
charge during the passing time. Simulation results showed that
an input voltage of only 1.5 V could generate an electric eld
intensity of about 1.17 kV cm1 across the cell suspension ow
in the squeezed area. The electropermeation of yeast cell was
observed, showing a permeabilization percentage up to 70%.
Adrian et al. developed a novel open-access microuidic
patch-clamp array chip by combining both a microscale softlithography and a macroscale polymer fabrication method.53
They demonstrated the capability of using such an openaccess uidic system for patch-clamp measurements. Experiments showed that the system was capable of performing whole
cell measurements and drug proling in a more efcient manner
than the traditional patch-clamp set-up.
Botzolakis et al. developed a novel microuidic approach54
to solution switching that allows for precise temporal control
over the neurotransmitter transient while substantially increasing experimental throughput, exibility, reproducibility, and costeffectiveness. When this system was used to apply ultra-brief
(similar to 400 s) GABA pulses to recombinant GABA
(A) receptors, members of the cys-loop family of LGICs,
the resulting currents resembled hippocampal inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) and differed from currents evoked by
longer, conventional pulses, illustrating the importance of evaluating LGICs on a synaptic timescale. This methodology should
therefore allow the effects of disease-causing mutations and
allosteric modulators to be evaluated in vitro under physiologically relevant conditions.
7. J. Lee, H. Moon, J. Fowler, T. Schoellhammer, and C.-J. Kim, Sens. Actuators, A 95, 259 (2002).
8. F. Mugele and J. C. Baret, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 705 (2005).
9. B. Biddut and N. Homayoun, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 132, 014501
(2010).
10. A. Manz, N. Graber, and H. M. Widmer, Sens. Actuators, B 1, 244 (1990).
11. J. D. Watson and F. H. Crick, Nature 171, 737 (1953).
12. J. S. Kirsty, T. D. Peter, V. Y. John, E. D. Charlotte, G. John, M. G. Gillian, and
J. H. Stephen, Lab Chip 10, 1725 (2010).
13. P. B. N. Maria, Y. Kenichi, N. Sanae, M. Masaya, N. Yasuhiro, and M. Hideaki,
Adv. Sci. Lett. 3, 273 (2010).
14. Z. Hua, L. R. Jeremy, E. E. Allen, S. Vijay, K. P. Vamsee, A. S. Wiley,
L. B. Jonathan, G. M. Thomas, and G. P. Michael, Anal. Chem. 82, 2310
(2010).
15. T. K. Yung, K. C. Chan, T. S. Mok, J. Tong, K. F. To, and Y. M. Lo, Clin. Cancer
Res. 15, 2076 (2009).
16. F. M. Lun, R. W. Chiu, C. K. C. Allen, L. T. Yeung, L. T. Kin, and L. Y. M.
Dennis, Clin. Chem. 54, 1664 (2008).
17. R. A. Mathies and X. C. Huang, Nature 359, 167 (1992).
18. H. Kambara and S. Takahashi, Nature 361, 565 (1993).
19. A. T. Woolley and R. A. Mathies, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 11348
(1994).
20. A. T. Woolley and R. A. Mathies, Anal. Chem. 67, 3676 (1995).
21. D. Summerer, D. Hevroni, A. Jain, O. Oldenburger, J. Parker, A. Caruso, C. F.
Stahler, P. F. Stahler, and M. Beier, New Biotechnol. 27, 149 (2010).
22. Y.-J. Chen, E. E. Roller, and X. Huang, Lab Chip 10, 1153 (2010).
23. D. Chatterjee, A. J. Ytterberg, S. U. Son, J. A. Loo, and R. L. Garrell, Anal.
Chem. 82, 2095 (2010).
24. J. J. Mais and R. W. Aaron, Anal. Chem. 81, 330 (2009).
25. F. Tian, P.-M. Adriele, E. Giovani, B. Andrea, M. Winfried, S. Holger,
K. Wolfgang, and S. Tobias, Nano Biomed. Eng. 1, 13 (2009).
26. D. Gao, J. Liu, H.-B. Wei, H.-F. Li, G.-S. Guo, and J.-M. Lin, Anal. Chim. Acta
665, 7 (2010).
27. N. L. Tatiana, F. Zhang, S. D. Jonathan, J. Liu, and J. L. Robert, Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 13, 633 (2009).
28. K. Hettiarachchi, S. Zhang, S. Feingold, A. P. Lee, and P. A. Dayton, Biotechnol. Prog. 25, 938 (2009).
29. D. S. Millington, R. Sista, A. Eckhardt, J. Rouse, D. Bali, R. Goldberg,
M. Cotten, R. Buckley, and V. Pamula, Semin. Perinatol. 34, 163 (2010).
30. C.-C. Lin, J.-H. Wang, H.-W. Wu, and G.-B. Lee, J. Assoc. Lab Autom. 15, 253
(2010).
31. R. Asmatulu, B. Zhang, and N. Nuraje, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 6383
(2010).
32. U. Masato, N. Hiroyuki, and M. Hideaki, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 577
(2009).
33. T.-R. Lee, Y.-S. Chang, J.-B. Choi, W. K. Liu, and Y.-J. Kim, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 7407 (2009).
34. J. Yan, D. Pan, C. Zhu, L. Wang, S. Song, and C. Fan, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 1194 (2009).
35. R. Weissleder and U. Mahmood, Radiology 219, 316 (2001).
36. X. H. Gao, L. L. Yang, J. A. Petros, F. F. Marshal, J. W. Simons, and S. M.
Nie, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 63 (2005).
37. E. P. Alexandra, G. Mhairi, M. Karin, N. S. Jeremy, A. M. Paul, and W. Mark,
Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 713 (2007).
38. I. Barbulovic-Nad, H. Yang, P. S. Park, and A. R. Wheeler, Lab Chip 8, 519
(2008).
39. J. Ji, J. Ruan, and D. Cui, Nano Biomed. Eng. 2, 67 (2010).
40. L. Hartley, V. I. S. K. Karan, and O. Yadid-Pecht, IEEE T. Circuits-I 54, 99
(2007).
41. H. Yahya and V. I. S. K. Karan, Sens. Actuators, A 157, 1 (2010).
42. R. S. Kane, S. Takayama, E. Ostuni, D. E. Ingber, and G. M. Whitesides,
Biomaterials 20, 2363 (1999).
43. S. Takayama, J. C. McDonald, E. Ostuni, M. N. Liang, P. J. A. Kenis,
R. F. Ismagilov, and G. M.Whitesides, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5545
(1999).
44. D. T. Chiu, N. L. Jeon, S. Huang, R. S. Kane, C. J. Wargo, I. S. Choi,
D. E. Ingber, and G. M. Whitesides, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2408
(2000).
45. H. Kaji, M. Nishizawa, and T. Matsue, Lab Chip 3, 208 (2003).
46. S. W. Rhee, A. M. Taylor, C. H. Tu, D. H. Cribbs, C. W. Cotman, and N. L.
Jeon, Lab Chip 5, 102 (2005).
47. Z. B. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. J. Yu, F.-T. M. Arthur, Y. Li, and M. Yang, Sens. Actuators, B 143, 776 (2010).
48. Y. Yamanishi, J. Teramoto, Y. Magariyama, A. Ishihama, T. Fukuda, and
F. Arai, IEEE T. Nanobiosci. 8, 312 (2009).
49. L. Liu, L. Kevin, L. David, Y. David, L. Guillaume, E.-T. Andr, C. S. James,
H. G. Robert, and H. A. Robert, Lab Chip 10, 1807 (2010).
154
RESEARCH ARTICLE
155