Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Shearography and thermography are optical techniques, both proven to be valuable tools for material
nondestructive evaluation. Papers on these topics, however, are scattered and mainly appeared in optical
journals. For the convenience of the materials community, this paper aims to present a comprehensive
review of shearography and active thermography and their applications in nondestructive evaluation of
materials. Both techniques enjoy the merits of full-eld, non-contact and allowing speedy detection of
material defects in metal, non-metal as well as composites materials. However, they are fundamentally
different in aw detection mechanisms. Shearography measures materials mechanical response to
stresses, whereas active thermography measures materials heat-transfer response to an instantaneous
thermal excitation. A comparison of the advantages and limitations of two techniques for nondestructive
evaluation will also be presented.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Review of digital shearography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Principal of digital shearography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
Fringe interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4.
Phase-shifting technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5.
Nondestructive testing with shearography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5.1.
Partial vacuum and pressurization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5.2.
Acoustic wave excitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5.3.
Thermal shock excitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Review of active thermography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
Thermal irradiation heating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.
Electromagnetic induction thermography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.
Digital image post-processing and image enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.1.
Thermographic signal reconstruction (TSR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.2.
Computerized tomography reconstruction (CTR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Applications of shearography for NDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.
Detection of adhesive delamination by digital shearography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.1.
Pneumatic tires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.2.
Composite panels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.3.
Mosaic tile facades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.4.
Space-frame structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.5.
FRP rehabilitated concrete structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.
Inspection of subsurface cracks and corrosion thinning by digital shearography .
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: memhung@cityu.edu.hk (Y.Y. Hung).
1
Recently joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
0927-796X/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.mser.2008.11.001
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
74
75
75
75
76
77
79
79
79
80
82
82
82
84
84
84
85
85
85
85
85
87
87
88
89
74
5.
6.
7.
4.2.1.
Pressure vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.2.
Aluminum and steel panels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.3.
Corrosion thinning of pipes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.
Leakage detection by digital shearography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.1.
Hermetic packaging of microelectronic devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3.2.
Detection of gas leakage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Applications of active thermography for NDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.
Buildings and civil applications by active thermography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.1.
Mosaic and ceramic wall tile bonding integrity inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.2.
Fiber reinforcement bonding evaluation in concrete structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.3.
Concrete surface aws inspection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.4.
Reinforcement steel bars detection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.
Investigation applications in automotive and aerospace industries by active thermography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.1.
Material aw detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.2.
Adhesive bonding integrity evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.3.
Composite structure evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.
Others diverse applications by active thermography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.1.
Pressure vessel evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.2.
Pipeline inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.3.
Micro-crack inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comparison of shearography and active thermography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
Recent advance in material development has resulted in a wide
range of novel material systems. Since traditional nondestructive
testing (NDT) techniques have not been as effective as envisioned,
there is a long-term need for innovative and effective NDT methods
capable of providing reliable, quantitative information regarding
the state of damage and overall integrity in such materials.
Common NDT techniques can be classied into seven major
categories: visual (e.g., visual inspection using borescope [1]),
penetrating radiation (e.g., X-ray [2], and neutron imaging [3]),
magnetic-electrical (e.g., magnetic particle [4], and Eddy current
[5]), mechanical vibration (e.g., ultrasonic [6], acoustic emission
[7], and tapping [6]), chemical/electrochemical (e.g., chemical spot
testing), thermal (e.g., infrared thermography [8]) and other
optical methods (e.g., Moire interferometry, holography, and
shearography [912]). Research efforts are being directed at
developing and perfecting NDT techniques capable of monitoring
(1) materials production processes [13], (2) material integrity
during transportation, storage and fabrication [14,15] and (3) the
amount and rate of degradation during service [16]. In addition,
efforts are underway to develop new NDT techniques capable of
measuring the discontinuity of the aws quantitatively [8,12],
permitting determination of material response using fracture
mechanics analysis, and replacing the qualitative materials
characterization techniques used in the past by quantitative
techniques [17].
Among the various new NDT techniques developed recently,
shearography and thermography NDT techniques have attracted
considerable interest in a wide variety of industries including
medical diagnostic, electronic, rubber, aerospace, automotive, and
construction. Both techniques have been proven to be invaluable
inspection tools for many applications; for instance, shearography
technique has been endorsed by the US-Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as a compulsory testing and evaluation method for
aircraft tires and thermography has been adopted as the
preliminary diagnostic aid for cancer. In order to adapt and
develop shearography and thermography NDT techniques for
evaluating particular materials, especially for real-time and mass
inspection, it is important to have the knowledge of the capabilities
as well as limitations of those techniques.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
90
90
91
92
92
94
94
94
95
96
96
97
98
99
102
103
105
105
108
108
108
111
111
111
Shearography, known as speckle pattern shearing interferometry (SPSI), is an interferometric measurement technique using
coherent laser illumination. It is developed to address limitations
of holography by (1) replacing the reference light beam by
common optical path approach, thus leading to simple optical
setup, reduced coherence-length requirement of the laser, and lax
vibration isolation and (2) direct measurement of selected rst
derivatives of specic surface displacement components. These
distinct advantages have rendered shearography as a practical
measurement tool that has already gained wide industrial
acceptance for NDT. In particular, shearography was routinely
employed for inspecting delaminations and other imperfections in
aircraft tires, and the technique was endorsed by the FAA [21].
Other applications of shearography include measurement of
specic surface strains, residual stresses, 3D shapes and vibration
modes, as well as leakage detection.
2.2. Principal of digital shearography
Digital shearography [20] employs solid-state sensors (such as
a CCD sensor array) as the recording media for data acquisition and
digital image processing. DISH addressed the limitations of
75
(1)
(2)
76
Eq. (3) for a rectangular plate that is xed along its circumference and
deformed due to a central point load
D
D
sin
jIs j jI I0 j 2B sin f
2
2
D
(3)
2p
Adu Bdv C dw
(4)
Ro
Rs
y yo y ys
B
Ro
Rs
z zo z zs
C
Ro
Rs
A
(5)
with R2o x2o y2o z2o and R2s x2s y2s z2s . It is also noted that
z = z(x, y) describes the object surface and is not an independent
variable when surface points are considered. Assuming the small
image-shearing direction is parallel to the x-direction as dx, Eq. (4)
may be written as
2p
du
dv
dw
B C
D
A
dx
(6)
dx
dx
dx
l
The relative displacement term in Eq. (6) may be subsequently
treated as the partial derivative of u, v, and w with respect to the xdirection of image-shearing. Thus, Eq. (6) may be rewritten as
2p
@u
@v
@w
B
C
D
A
dx
(7)
@x
@x
@x
l
Alternating the image-shearing direction by rotating the imageshearing device about its optical axis will result fringe pattern
depicting displacement-derivatives with respect to the current
shearing direction. Therefore, if it is sheared in the y-direction by
an amount, dy, Eq. (7) is revised as follows:
2p
@u
@v
@w
B
C
D
A
dy
(8)
@y
@y
@y
l
The fringe patterns shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b) indicate a laterally
deected plate representing @w=@x and @w=@y, respectively.
77
Fig. 4. The fringe pattern obtained by Eqs. (7) and (8) of a laterally deected plate xed along its boundaries and subjected to uniform pressure: (a) @w=@x and (b) @w=@y.
(9)
Therefore, this optical arrangement measures only the out-ofplane slope component, @w=@x. The deformation fringes shown in
Figs. 3 and 4(a) are obtained with such an optical setup.
In addition to single-beam illumination above, shearography
with dual-beam illumination were also developed for in-plane strain
measurement [21]. However, for the purpose of nondestructive
testing, it is generally sufcient to measure only the out-of-plane
deformation. So, the single-beam illumination setup is usually
employed for its operational simplicity and cost effectiveness.
2.4. Phase-shifting technique
Since rst generation photographic shearography inspection
relies on human interpretation of fringe patterns as an indication of
a deformation anomaly, it is not possible to quantitatively measure
the deformation derivative. As a result, it is difcult to determine
the dimensions of a aw or other geometric anomaly. With the
introduction of the phase-shifting techniques, automated fringephase interpretation becomes feasible and the deformation
Fig. 5. Digital shearography with phase-shift capability. Phase-shifting is performed using a computer-controlled variable wave retarder made of liquid crystal.
78
(11)
f arctan
I2 I4
I3 I1
(12)
f D arctan
I02 I04
I03 I01
(13)
79
(14)
(15)
where D(t) represents the relative phase change that is due to the
change of optical path length caused by the vibration. Since the
excitation frequency usually ranges from several hundred-hertz to
a kilohertz, which is much higher than the video frame rate of the
CCD camera, the image recorded in the current frame is a timeaveraged specklegram
Iavg
1
T
It dt
0
1
T
fA B cosf Dtg dt
0
(16)
80
Z
1 T
4p @w
sin vt
Iavg
A B cos f dx
dt
T 0
l @x
4p @w
A B cos fJ 0 V
(18)
A B cos fJ 0 dx
l @x
where J0(V) is the zero-order Bessel function of the rst kind and V
is equal to dx4p=l@w=@x. By conventional subtraction
technique with a xed reference frame, the result of real-time
subtraction between Eqs. (14) and (18) is:
Is Ir Iavg B cos f1 J 0 V
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
81
Fig. 10. Dynamic responses of a circular debond at frequencies (a) 516 Hz, (b) 1030 Hz, (c) 1483 Hz.
82
1
r2 M T
1 vD
(23)
Fig. 13. Schematic diagrams for transient pulse thermography in aws detection.
83
Fig. 14. Logarithmic time evolution of surface temperature deviates under different depth of aws. Temperature decay is expected to occur with a slope of 0.5 until heat
transfer is obstructed by the presence of aw(s).
L2
pt
(24)
Fig. 15. Experimental arrangements for static induction thermography in rebar detection: (a) rear heating mode; (b) front heating mode.
84
(25)
mo It
1
q
2p
2
b r z2
"
b r 2 z2
2
b r
z2
Em Km
p
where r x2 y2 , m = 4br/[(b + r)2 + z2)], and K(m) and E(m) are
the complete elliptic integrals of the rst and second kind
respectively, z is the distance between the coil and the sample
surface. As alternating current is used to generate the magnetic
eld,p
the penetration
depth of magnetic eld is given as
(27)
where Jx and Jy are the eddy current density for the twodimensional components. The plate temperature value through
all kind of thermal sources can be expressed as [47]
@2 T @2 T h1 h2
e1 e2 s SB 4
T T a
T Ta4
wk
wk
@x2 @y2
px; y; t
k
1 @T
a @t
(28)
where the rst term on the left of Eq. (28) is the temperature
diffusion throughout the plate, and the last term is heat generated
by eddy current, which is part of the electromagnetic induction
process. Since induction heating is relatively short, it can be
assumed that no energy convection and radiation are transferred
to the plate surface during the heating operation. Therefore,
Eq. (28) can be simplied as
px; y; t 1 @T
k
a @t
(29)
#
(26)
Jx2 Jy2
lnT ln
Q
1
lnpt
e
2
(30)
(31)
n0
P2
P1
@T
dL T p2 T p1
@L
(32)
(33)
i1
where L(Si) is the length of segment Si, Tx(xi, yi) and Ty(xi, yi) are the
temperature derivatives at the ith intervals. A group of equations
with unknowns Tx(xi,yi) and Ty(xi,yi) are generated after connecting
every two points on the boundary, and then the unknown area
temperature distribution can be reconstructed. The reconstruction
result will be illustrated in a forthcoming experimental section.
85
86
Vacuum loading is applicable for detecting adhesive delamination in composite panels using shearography. Laboratory
samples of aluminum-CFRP panels with purposely engineered
delaminations were tested in a similar fashion as tires. Fig. 18
shows the fringe patterns of the two embedded circular aws of
different diameters. However, application of a partial vacuum is
limited to debonds with enclosed boundaries, i.e. metal/metal
honeycomb bonds [55]. If the aw is open to the atmosphere, i.e.
skin panel to stringers bond [55], then it is not possible to induce
deformation by partial vacuum and shearography inspection
may not be applicable. Two failure-to-spot aws are illustrated
by white circles in Fig. 18. It is obvious that partial vacuum
loading is not successful in such cases. Fortunately, this
limitation was successfully addressed by dynamic excitation
using acoustic-waves, and this will be covered in the following
subsection.
Fig. 17. Shearogram of the tire indicating delamination in the interior and long steel belt-edge.
87
Fig. 18. Partial vacuum loading reveals two of the four circular debonds in a composite panel. The two undetected aws are circled. Non-detection is believed to be due to
opening of aws to the atmosphere.
Fig. 19. Shearography for mosaic tile inspection. This photo shows the horn speaker, the laser shearography camera and the PC operating interface.
88
Fig. 20. Shearogram with xed reference frame and multiple frequencies sweeping (as referred to Eq. (19)), which reveals debonds as white patches.
Fig. 21. Schematic diagram of the panel-frame structure where the non-shaded
patch in the middle represents delamination.
89
Fig. 22. Shearogram reveals the debond as a dark patch in the middle region.
material degradation processes including pitting corrosion, thinning, and creep damage. DISH evaluation of such components
provides the quantitative information necessary for assessment of
the criticality of structural degradation in components.
Among various structural materials, stainless steels are most
commonly used in a wide variety of industries including power,
chemical, petrochemical, and nuclear. These steels exhibit
excellent resistance to general corrosion, adequate mechanical
properties and good workability. However, these steels suffer from
attack by localized corrosion. A number of failures of stainless steel
components have been attributed to these localized corrosion
processes, especially in nuclear and petrochemical industries [76].
Therefore, nondestructive evaluation plays a crucial role for both
in-service maintenance and repair verication, thereby minimizing downtime due to unexpected critical failure. Conventional NDT
techniques such as ultrasonic [77,78] and eddy current [79,80]
methods are inherently handicapped for such a massive operation
because of sensor limitations. On the other hand, as a full-eld and
90
Fig. 24. Schematic representation of CFRP repaired concrete structure with two
circular debonds 25 mm and 35 mm.
91
guided wave [77,78], eddy current [79,80] and near-eld millimeter-wave [88]. However, some of these techniques are still
limited to point-by-point measurement and substantial data postprocessing is required to determine the exact location of corroded
defects. Therefore, a speedy and full-eld NDT screening technique, such as DISH [21,75], could be helpful to alleviate the
conicting goals of reliable detection and the reduction of overall
inspection costs.
To replicate corrosion in stainless steel pipe, two internal
portions of a 6-mm thick #316 stainless steel tube was deliberately
removed by electrical discharge machining as shown in the
schematic diagram Fig. 35. The locations C1 and C2 represent the
two corroded pits of 30 mm and 60 mm diameter, respectively.
Both defects are 1 mm below the observed surface of the tube,
representing severe loss of material due to corrosion. The
experiment was performed by thermal shock loading using a
Xenon ash and the result shown in Fig. 36 clearly reveals the two
simulated aws. The fringe density at C2 was double of that at C1
92
Fig. 28. Schematic representation of the aluminum #6061 panel with engineered crack.
The following examples illustrate its effectiveness for nondestructive detection of different types of leakage.
4.3.1. Hermetic packaging of microelectronic devices
Microelectronic circuits and components that are exposed to all
types of environments require hermetic packaging. In addition to
providing mechanical protection and thermal dissipation, a
hermetic packaging prevents the intrusion of atmospheric contaminants such as moisture and airborne particles, thereby
mitigating their attack on the enclosed delicate electronic
components. However, imperfect sealing of the devices allows
moisture and other impurities to migrate into the package causing
microcircuit malfunctions. To date, testing of hermetic seals of
microelectronic packages is achieved primarily through uorocarbon uid, helium and even radioisotope leak detection [90],
which are cumbersome and risky in operation, therefore unemployable on production lines. Shearography, which measures realtime deformation of the lid of the hermetic packaging, in
cooperation with a partial vacuum chamber or pressurization
Fig. 29. Aluminum (#6061) panel inspected by shearography with thermal shock loading.
Fig. 31. Different fringe density by cracks A and B at different depth, where B is further away from the observed surface.
Fig. 32. Stainless steel pipe inspected by shearography with thermal shock loading.
93
94
Fig. 33. PVC pipe inspected by shearography with thermal shock loading.
95
Fig. 35. Schematic representation of stainless steel tube with replicated corrosion
pits C1 and C2.
96
Fig. 37. Observed surface deformation of A and B by partial vacuum at the 1st second.
Fig. 38. A remains unchanged whereas B recovers due to leakage of its hermetic seal.
97
Fig. 40. The escaping jet of helium gas indicates leakage from a valve of a pressure vessel.
98
Fig. 41. Tile wall sample and its thermal image of the second derivative calculation: (a) small mosaic and (b) shiny tile.
induction thermography for rebar detection since the whole Lshape of rebar can be revealed and (b) it is much easier than other
traditional techniques to identify the shape of rebar.
5.2. Investigation applications in automotive and aerospace
industries by active thermography
Infrared thermography has been successfully applied in numerous automotive and aerospace manufacturing facilities. Most
systems are used to understand and resolve manufacturing
problems as well as for machines and facilities maintenance.
Recently, thermography has been applied to characterize the
performance of combustion engines, investigate air ow through
visualization, and monitor the central processing unit in automobiles. During production, infrared thermography can be used to
inspect die casting, injection molding, and monitor welding and
hardening processes, and so on. Furthermore, thermography also
acts as an examination tool to assess the quality of a product, such as
the integrity of component bonds and overall structure evaluation.
In this section, three of the most common inspection
applications for the thermography technique in the automotive
and aerospace industries are chosen. Flaw detection, bonding
integrity assessment and composite structure evaluation are
illustrated. Different loadings were employed in different applications to obtain the most efcient and reliable result from
thermography.
Fig. 42. Thermal image of mosaic wall after transient pulse thermography.
99
Fig. 43. Log plot for the mosaic wall with different debond regions after the transient pulse thermography.
Fig. 44. Tile sample and its thermal image of the second derivative calculation and the difference of second derivative plots among the intact region and aws at different
depths (AD) for the large tile sample.
100
Fig. 45. Thermal result for the carbon reinforcement concrete sample.
Fig. 46. Thermal result for CFRP sample inspection under the excitation of rebars using induction thermography: (a) initially, dening debond region, (b) later, dening
debond and rebar locations.
Fig. 47. Thermal images of concrete sample after transient pulse thermography, where the black line represents a micro-crack.
101
Fig. 48. Thermal images for different orientations of rebar inside the concrete sample: (a) four rebar inside the concrete; (b) L-shape rebar.
Fig. 49. Thermal image for steel plate sample demonstration including (a) raw data and (b) rst derivative.
Fig. 50. Thermal image for aluminum plate sample including: (a) raw data and (b) rst derivative.
102
Fig. 51. (a and b) log plots showing programmed aws and awless (intact and ref data) for steel and aluminum alloy samples, respectively.
subsurface aws were identied with the aid of image enhancement techniques such as reconstruction of thermal data, subtraction and convolution processes. The relative depth of the aws
could be determined from the temperature prole across the
surface, as shown in Fig. 53. The depths of aws, from left to right in
Fig. 53, were 3 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm beneath the surface for
position F3, F2, and F4, respectively. The interpretation of this
phenomenon is related to Ohms law due to the variation of
resistance across the subsurface aws, thereby demonstrating the
potential applicability of induction thermography for applying in
the nondestructive evaluation.
5.2.2. Adhesive bonding integrity evaluation
Automotive and aerospace industries are facing the challenges
to reduce manufacturing costs by facilitating factory automation.
Therefore, adhesive bonding has become an attractive alternative
to conventional mechanical fastening mechanisms. Manufacturers
have introduced various fabrication techniques and light-weight
Fig. 52. Thermal result for subsurface aw inspection in steel plate using induction thermography.
103
Fig. 53. Temperature prole across the steel plate to reveal the position of aws.
represents the bonded region for the plate and rod since heat could
ow through the bond region and cooled faster than the debonded
region. Fig. 55 shows reection and transmission thermography
results for the car bonnet inspection. Both reection and
transmission modes [34] are employed for inspection of bond
integrity in the bonnet. In Fig. 55c and d, both thermal images
reveal the same adhesive bonding positions using reective and
transition modes, respectively. The result obtained in the reection
mode gave a clearer response for the bonds than the transition
mode; the heat conduction in transition mode was obstructed by
the frame during the excitation.
Fig. 54. Thermal image of adhesive response of Al plate and rod after transient pulse thermography.
104
Fig. 55. Transition mode results using of pulse thermography for bond inspection in car bonnet: (a) exterior view, (b) interior view; thermal image response for adhesion bond
points in a common inspection area: (c) reection mode; (d) transition mode.
Fig. 56. Thermal image of Al plate adhesive with carbon ber sample with 20 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm and 50 mm diameter subsurface aws.
105
Fig. 57. log plot and second derivate plot show the behavior of the temperature variation within the time evolution for different regions: well-bonded, 20 mm aw, points A
and B.
Fig. 58. Prole of different aws sizes: 20 mm, 30 mm, 40 mm, 50 mm diameters aws.
FWHM
Error (%)
20
30
40
50
20.22
28.70
39.13
48.91
1.09
4.35
2.17
2.17
106
Fig. 59. Thermal images of multi-layer plastic plates with different depths of subsurface aws: (a) raw thermal image; (b) second derivative processing of thermal image.
Fig. 60. Behavior of aws at different depths for multi-layer plastic plates: (a) logarithmic plot for raw data; (b) logarithmic second derivative plot.
aw shapes and sizes. In Fig. 61, thermal results reveal clear lineshaped thermal marks, identifying the location and orientation of
subsurface aws. Moreover, the log plot in Fig. 61b shows the
deviation of the aw response from the unawed region. The
behavior of the horizontal and vertical aws demonstrated similar
response. Fig. 62 presents results from inspection of hemispherical
aws of different sizes in the pressure vessel sample (see Fig. 35).
Three circular hot-spots were revealed on the surfaces of the
pressure vessel. Corrosion thinning could also be revealed from
Fig. 62b, where the change of amplitude is seen as a hill shape
Fig. 61. Thermal image of the pressure vessel: (a) thermal image after pulse excitation of the line subsurface aws; (b) log plot for the response of the line aws and the
unawed region.
107
Fig. 62. Thermal image of the pressure vessel: (a) thermal image after pulse excitation of the hemispherical subsurface aws; (b) the temperature prole for the point P1 and
P2; (c) log plot for the response of the hemispherical aws and the unawed region.
Fig. 63. Thermal image for the pressure vessel using induction thermography.
108
Fig. 64. Prole plot for the thermal results across the circular subsurface aws.
does not have any ash lighting or thermal radiation heat source for
excitation. Therefore, the object surfaces thermal properties will not
affect the thermal energy excitation. The steel pressure vessel
sample with circular subsurface aws was inspected using induction
thermography inspection. Fig. 63 shows the result of induction
thermography after excitation by an induction coil. Three circular
aws were detected, as in pulse thermography, and the temperature
prole was presented in Fig. 64. Comparison with the temperature
prole in Fig. 62(b), induction thermography gave a smoother curve
than that of transient pulse thermography, as shown in Fig. 64. One
of the reasons was the elimination of the inuence of a materials
surface thermal properties during inductive excitation.
5.3.2. Pipeline inspection
Plastic pipelines are widely used in drainage systems in
buildings. Transient pulse thermography has been applied
successfully to inspect the quality of plastic targets [113117].
A plastic pipeline with aws was inspected by transient pulse
thermography using a CTR method. Fig. 65 shows the enhancement of aw detectability by using the CTR method to eliminate
the effect of uneven surface thermal properties. In Fig. 65(a), a
small part of the pipe surface covered by white plastic tape with
different emissivity and heat conduction is shown. Subsurface
aws were observed using pulse thermography inspection, though
the different emissivity at the covered region degraded aw
visibility (Fig. 65(b)) and the covered region disturbed the
inspection result. As shown in Fig. 65(c), the CTR method enhances
aw visibility by reducing the inuence of uneven surface thermal
properties without affecting the thermal response of the aw.
5.3.3. Micro-crack inspection
AIT is being applied for various surface quality inspections, such
as coating quality and surface aws inspection [46,47,118]. The
advantage of using AIT is that the thermal response of the on-plane
thermal diffusion can be detected simply by the temperature
patterns indicating local imperfections, such as variable coating
quality and the presence of surface cracks.
In this section, transient pulse and induction thermography are
used to investigate a steel rail sample with a micro-crack. Fig. 66
shows the thermal result using pulse and induction heating
excitation methods and the location of the surface crack is clearly
revealed as a discontinuity in the surface temperature distribution
109
Fig. 65. (a) Plastic pipe with black paint and region covered by other materials. Thermal images of plastic pipe with a subsurface crack after the pulse thermography inspection
(b) before CRT reconstruction and (c) after CRT reconstruction.
Fig. 66. Thermography results for micro-crack detection (marked with white arrow) in steel rail sample using different thermal loading methods: transient pulse heating
(left); induction heating (right).
Table 2
Characteristics of digital shearography and active thermography.
Digital shearography
Active thermography
Full eld
Non-contact inspection
Measures mechanical deformation
Loading methods: partial vacuum pressure, acoustic wave,
and thermal shock excitation
Capture the speckle patterns for analysis
Fringe pattern distribution in shearography image
Qualitative and quantitative analysis through density
of fringe pattern
Rigid-body movement inuence
Indication detected by contrast with aw-free background
Full eld
Non-contact inspection
Measures thermal radiation
Loading methods: long heating pulse, transient pulse excitation, and induction heating
Capture a sequence of thermal images for analysis
Anomalous hot-spot deviated from the ideal awless region, and derivative value in TSR value
Qualitative and quantitative analysis through temperature distribution
and its transition time
Materials surface thermal properties inuence
Indication detected by temperature contrast with the numerical value of derivative
110
the test sample and the measurement system. This movement can
cause de-correlation of speckle patterns and deterioration of fringe
visibility, thereby reducing aw detectability [119,120]. To reduce
such problems, an effective method is to attach the shearography
inspection system to the test object.
Active thermography detects infrared radiation from the test
object to measure surface temperature response to the thermal
excitation. This technique can be employed in various kinds of
materials and environment, and the thermal image is generally
easier to interpret as compared to a shearographic image.
However, its fundamental mechanism for detecting aws is heat
Fig. 67. Direct comparisons of image results with different types of aw using the shearography and active thermography techniques.
111
[2] V.V. Nagarkar, S.R. Miller, S.V. Tipnis, V.B. Gaysinskiy, Proceedings of SPIE 4503
(2002) 265.
[3] M. Michaloudaki, E. Lehmann, D. Kosteas, International Journal of Adhesion and
Adhesives 25 (2005) 257.
[4] D. Lovejoy, Magnetic Particle Inspection: A Practical Guide, Chapman and Hall,
New York, 1993.
[5] S. Udpa, P. Moore, Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Electromagnetic Testing,
vol. 5, ASNT, 2002.
[6] A. Birks, R. Green, P. McIntire, Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Ultrasonic
Testing, vol. 7, ASNT, 1991.
[7] R. Miller, P. McIntire, Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Acoustic Emission
Testing, vol. 5, ASNT, 1987.
[8] X.P. Maldague, Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials by Infrared
Thermography, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
[9] Y.Y. Hung, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 24 (1996) 161.
[10] Y.Y. Hung, Composites Part B: Engineering 30 (1999) 765.
[11] Y.Y. Hung, W.D. Luo, L. Lin, H.M. Shang, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 33
(2000) 369.
[12] Y.Y. Hung, W.D. Luo, L. Lin, H.M. Shang, Composite Structures 50 (2000) 353.
[13] R. Murayama, K. Fujisawa, H. Fukuoka, M. Hirao, NDT & E International 29 (1996)
141.
[14] R. Murayama, K. Fujisawa, M. Hirao, H. Fukuoka, NDT & E International 30 (1997)
377.
[15] T. DOrazio, M. Leo, A. Distante, C. Guaragnella, V. Pianese, G. Cavaccini, NDT & E
International 41 (2008) 145.
[16] O. Kazuhiro, M. Dorian, S. Tetsuo, S. Minoru, H. Hideo, NDT & E International 32
(1999) 177.
[17] E.A. Fuchs, P. Hughett, D.C. MacMillan, Experimental Techniques 12 (1988) 18.
[18] Y.Y. Hung, Optical Engineering 21 (1982) 391.
[19] Y.Y. Hung, J.D. Hovanesian, in: Proceedings of the 1990 SEM Spring Conference
on Experimental Mechanics Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 46, (1990), p. 769.
[20] Y.Y. Hung, The 16th Symposium on Nondestructive Evaluation, San Antonio,
Texas, April 2123, 1987, and Apparatus and Method for Electronic Analysis of
Test Object, U.S. Patent 4,887,899 (1989).
[21] Y.Y. Hung, H.P. Ho, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 49 (2005) 61.
[22] J.W. Goodman, in: J.C. Dainty (Ed.), Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, pp. 975.
[23] Y.Y. Hung, Optics Communications 11 (1974) 132.
[24] J.A. Leendertz, J.N. Butters, Journal of Physics: E Scientic Instrument 6 (1973)
1107.
[25] Y.J. Chao, C.E. Taylor, M.A. Sutton, Journal of Applied Mechanics 49 (1982) 837.
[26] M.Y.Y. Hung, H.M. Shang, L. Yang, Optical Engineering 42 (2003) 1197.
[27] K. Creath, in: Proceedings of SEM Conference on Hologram Interferometry and
Speckle Metrology, Baltimore, Maryland, November 58, (1990), pp. 473478.
[28] C.D. Ghiglia, D.M. Pritt, Two-Dimensional Phase Unwrapping: Theory, Algorithm,
and Software, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.
[29] Y.Y. Hung, W.D. Luo, H.M. Shang, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 33 (2000) 369.
[30] W. Steinchen, L.X. Yang, Digital Shearography: Theory and Application of Digital
Speckle Shearing Interferometry, SPIE Press, Washington, 2003, p. 203 (Chapter
8).
[31] F. Lanza di Scalea, J.B. Spicer, R.E. Green, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation
12 (2000) 43.
[32] J.L. Champion, J.B. Spicer, R. Osiander, J.W.M. Spicer, Research in Nondestructive
Evaluation 13 (2001) 173.
[33] N. Noda, R.B. Hetnarski, Y. Tanigawa, Thermal Stresses, 2nd edition, Taylor and
Francis, New York, 2003.
[34] X.P. Maldague, Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Nondestructive
Testing, Wiley, New York, 2001.
[35] C. Maierhofer, A. Brink, M. Rollig, H. Wiggenhauser, Construction and Building
Materials 19 (2005) 731.
[36] Y.Y. Hung, Y.S. Chen, S.P. Ng, S.M. Shepard, Y. Hou, J.R. Lhota, Optical Engineering
46 (2007), p. 051007-1.
[37] W.N. Reynolds, Canadian Journal of Physics 64 (1986) 1150.
[38] J.M. Mile, W.N. Reynolds, Proceedings of SPIE 520 (1984) 119.
[39] D.P. Almond, S.K. Lau, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 27 (1994) 1063.
[40] D.P. Almond, S.K. Lau, Applied Physics Letter 62 (1993) 3369.
[41] M.B. Seintey, D.P. Almond, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 28 (1995) 2539.
[42] H.S. Carslaw, J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford,
1986.
[43] W.J. Parker, R.J. Jenkins, C.P. Butler, G.L. Abbott, Journal of Applied Physics 32
(1961) 1679.
[44] P.R. Brady, M.R. Kulkarni, NDT & E International 29 (1996) 205.
[45] Z.J. Yang, J.R. Hull, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics Mechanics
10 (1999) 351.
[46] N. Tsopelas, N.J. Siakavellas, NDT & E International 40 (2006) 12.
[47] N. Tsopelas, N.J. Siakavellas, NDT & E International 39 (2006) 391.
[48] S.M. Shepard, U.S. Patent No. 6,516,084 (2003).
[49] S.M. Shepard, Proceedings of SPIE 4360 (2001) 511.
[50] S.M. Shepard, J.R. Lhota, B.A. Rubadeux, D. Wang, T. Ahmed, Optical Engineering
42 (2003) 1337.
[51] W. Steinchen, L. Yang, G. Kupfer, P. Mackel, Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 212 (1998) 21.
[52] A. Ettemeyer, Nuclear Engineering and Design 160 (1996) 237.
[53] T.A. Barnes, I.R. Pashby, Journal of Material Processing Technology 99 (2000) 72.
[54] Y.Y. Hung, D.H. Shi, Optical Engineering 37 (1998) 1406.
[55] A. Higgins, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 20 (2000) 367.
112
[89] L. Clifford, L. Paggie, South China Morning Post, Hong Kong, April 12, 2006,
www.scmp.com.hk.
[90] R. Mohanty, J. Lee, in: K. Gilleo (Ed.), Hermetic Packaging Systems: Adhesive and
Getter, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004 , pp. 2547 (Chapter 2).
[91] D.M. McCann, M.C. Forde, NDT & E International 34 (2001) 71.
[92] Ch. Maierhofer, R. Arndt, M. Rollig, C. Rieck, A. Walther, H. Scheel, B. Hillemeier,
Cement and Concrete Composites 28 (2006) 393.
[93] ASTM Standard D4788-88 (reapproved) 1997.
[94] O. Robert, W.M.J. Spicer, Revue Generale de Thermique 37 (1998) 680.
[95] O. Hag-Elsa, S. Alampalli, J. Kunin, Composite Structures 64 (2004) 179.
[96] S.E. Watkins, J.W. Fonda, A. Nanni, Optical Engineering 46 (2007), 051010-1.
[97] V. Barrilea, R. Pucinotti, NDT & E International 38 (2005) 596.
[98] J. Hugenschmidt, R. Mastrangelo, Cement and Concrete Composites 28 (2006)
384.
[99] M.T. Liang, P.J. Su, Cement and Concrete Research 31 (2001) 1427.
[100] N.P. Avdelidis, B.C. Hawtin, D.P. Almond, NDT & E International 36 (2003)
433.
[101] D. Bates, G. Smith, D. Lu, J. Hewitt, Composites Part B: Engineering 31 (2004) 175.
[102] N.P. Avdelidis, D.P. Almond, A. Dobbinson, B.C. Hawtin, C. Ibarra-Castanedod, X.
Maldague, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 40 (2004) 143.
[103] C. Meola, G.M. Carlomagno, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 20
(2006) 589.
[104] J.A. Schroeder, T. Ahmed, B. Chaudhry, S. Shepard, Composites Part A: Applied
Science and Manufacturing 33 (2002) 1511.
[105] C. Meola, G.M. Carlomagno, G. Giorleo, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 18 (2004) 617.
[106] N.P. Avdelidis, D.P. Almond, NDT & E International 37 (2004) 353.
[107] N.P. Avdelidis, A. Moropoulou, Z.P. Marioli Riga, Progress in Aerospace Sciences
39 (2003) 317.
[108] R.J. Ball, D.P. Almond, NDT & E International 31 (1998) 165.
[109] C. Meola, G.M. Carlomagno, A. Squillace, G. Giorleo, Infrared Physics & Technology 46 (2004) 93.
[110] P.K. Liaw, H. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Yang, J.Y. Huang, R.C. Kuo, J.G. Huang, Scripta
Materialia 42 (2000) 389.
[111] B. Yang, P.K. Liaw, H. Wang, L. Jiang, J.Y. Huang, R.C. Kuo, J.G. Huang, Materials
Science and Engineering: A 314 (2001) 131.
[112] B. Yang, P.K. Liaw, M. Morrison, C.T. Liu, R.A. Buchanan, J.Y. Huang, R.C. Kuo, J.G.
Huang, D.E. Fielden, Intermetallics 13 (2005) 419.
[113] C. Santulli, Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 19 (2003) 79.
[114] C. Meola, G.M. Carlomagno, L. Giorleo, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 23
(2004) 125.
[115] M. Omar, M. Hassan, K. Donohue, K. Saito, R. Alloo, NDT & E International 39
(2006) 1.
[116] D.L. Balageas, J.C. Krapez, P. Cielo, Journal of Applied Physics 59 (1986) 348.
[117] G. Giorleo, C. Meola, NDT & E International 35 (2002) 287.
[118] S. Marinetti, D. Robba, F. Cernuschi, P.G. Bison, E. Grinzato, Infrared Physics &
Technology 49 (2007) 281.
[119] M.O. Petersen, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 8 (1991) 1082.
[120] H.T. Yura, S.G. Hanson, T.P. Grum, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10
(1993) 316.
[121] X. Maldague, Advances in Signal Processing for Nondestructive Evaluation of
Materials, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1994.