Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
benefits to human health. By treating the water with fluoride, every time a person would drink
clean water, they will be also treating their teeth with the fluoride in the water, therefore reducing
dental caries over time. However, this method is only efficient if the water supply is constantly
regulated and distributed through a clean and preferably piped water system to a majority of the
population. In 1980s Jamaica, many of the houses outside of the capital and big cities did not
have a water system. Most of those living out of the city collected rainwater to drink. The cost of
water fluoridation may cost up to ninety cents per person per year, depending on the size of the
community (pg. 137). This is less expensive than the first alternative, but more costly than what
was done. Though more costly, if possible, this route would have proven more efficiently if
everything was done correctly.
Last way, would be the way that was taken, salt fluoridation. This process would include
introducing the ion to salt, so when the salt is consumed, it will then help reduce dental caries.
This process was estimated to be six cents per person per year, therefore being the cheapest
option. During a study in Colombia done by the PAHO during the 1960 to 1970s comparing the
effects of salt fluoridation and water fluoridation, salt fluoridation reduced dental caries by 50%
while water fluoridation reduced dental caries by 60%. Therefore when done correctly, water
fluoridation would be more effective but more costly. In Jamaica where the salt distribution was
increasingly further than clean water, it proved to be more efficient.
Step 5: Recommendation
The route that was taken by the Jamaican government, Dr. Warpeha, and the PAHO was
the correct route. Though it was less efficient than water fluoridation, the results were astounding.
Since there was only one salt company in Jamaica, it was easy to have salt fluoridation. The
government was able to get word out to the public about what was happening to the salt they
were going to consume, and easily convinced them that this was good, therefore people were
reassured that the salt would not harm then and continued to buy salt.
Step 6: Future
In my opinion, I believed the PAHO handled this well. Salt proved to be more efficient to
get the fluoride out to every home than water. This way many more children were prevented
from having dental caries. The cost was low, it was effective, and there were many benefits from
it, I believe that any other way would not have produced such great results as these. It was smart
to compare Jamaica to Colombia when the process started since both countries were developing
and had similar problems. Colombia proves that water was more effective but only depending on
the environmental factors. Therefore, Dr. Warpeha was able to learn from what happened at
Colombia and apply it to Jamaica.
Resources
Donahue, G. J., Waddell, N., Plough, A. L., del Aguila, M. A., Garland, T. E. (2005). The
ABCDs of treating the most prevalent childhood disease [Abstract]. American Journal of
Public Health. 95(8), 1322-1324.
Jones, S., Burt, B. A., Petersen, P. E., Lennon, M. A. (2005). The effective use of Fluorides in
public health. SciFLO Public Health, 83(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S004296862005000900012
Levine, R. (2007). Case studies in global health: Millions saved. Sudburry, MA: Jones &
Bartlett Learning.