Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ri
/75~~, l
ThPerpltnMsu
;'/
Ift l IThe
// i\ g \
fAtBlei
2002
www.jstor.org
Illustrated
Medieval
Apocalypse:
the
Picturing
from
Leaves
Spanish
Manuscript
William D. Wixom
MargaretLawson
THE METROPOLITAN
MUSEUM
OF ART
Director's Note
Ten years ago, when welcoming the Beatus manuscript leaves
featured in this Bulletin to the Museum as a recent acquisition,
I mentioned that their collective importance was such that
three years of Cloisters acquisitions funds had been set aside
for their purchase. Selected leaves have since been included in
two major special exhibitions-"The Glory of Byzantium" in
1997 and "Mirror of the Medieval World" in 1999-and been
published in the accompanying catalogues, but we have not yet
had the opportunity to present the entire sequence of illuminations in all of their visual splendor and expressive power.
Now, we take the unusual step of devoting an issue of the
Bulletin to a single work-and as it happens, the timing of the
publication is noteworthy as well. The title of this Bulletin,
"Picturing the Apocalypse,"carries an unavoidable resonance
in the wake of the tragedies of last September. On the day of
the attacks, whether watching on television or at closer, more
devastating range, we all sought ways to comprehend the magnitude of the disaster.We could not help but imagine the world
caught up in an overwhelming chain of events that could lead
to further, even broader catastrophes. We looked for solace
wherever we could find it. In the days and weeks that followed,
many people came to the Museum to be comforted, to achieve
serenity, to be distracted by beauty.
The Beatus manuscripts of the tenth to thirteenth century
are illustrated commentaries on the Apocalypse, the final book
of the New Testament. The illustrations depict the end of the
world quite literally, as described in the biblical text, with hail
This publication was made possible
Winter2002
VolumeLIX,Number3
(ISSN 0026-1521)
Copyright ?
2002
by The
MetropolitanMuseumof Art.
Periodicals
Publishedquarterly.
postagepaidat NewYork,N.Y.,and
AdditionalMailingOffices.The
Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin
year.Singlecopies$8.95.Four
weeks'noticerequiredfor change
of address.POSTMASTER: Send
addresschangesto Membership
Department,The Metropolitan
Museumof Art,1000FifthAvenue,
New York, N.Y. 10028-0198. Back
issuesavailableon microfilmfrom
UniversityMicrofilms,300 N. Zeeb
Road, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48106.
Volumes I-XXXVII (1905-42) available as clothbound reprint set or
as individual yearly volumes from
Ayer Company Publishers Inc.,
50 Northwestern Drive #1o, Salem,
N.H. 03079, or from the Museum,
Box 700, Middle Village, N.Y. 11379.
GeneralManagerof Publications:
JohnP.O'Neill
Editorin Chiefof theBulletin:
JoanHolt
Editor:JenniferBernstein
Production:
PeterAntony,JoanHolt,
and SallyVanDevanter
Assistant:
DesktopPublishing
MinjeeCho
Design:TsangSeymourDesign
Director
All photographsof worksin the
Museum'scollection,unlessotherwise noted,areby the Photograph
Studioof The Metropolitan
Museumof Art.New photography
of the Museum'sCardenaBeatus
leaves,includingthe wraparound
coverdetail,is by EileenTravellof
the PhotographStudio.The photographof the acanthusplanton p. 13
is by PeterZerayof the Photograph
Studio.Photographsof the Morgan
Beatus(figs. 19, 22, 25, 27, 29, 31, 34,
35, 38, 39, 41, 44) are courtesy of The
Beni
Fotografico,Soprintendenza
Artisticie Storicidi Firenze,
Florence,fig.18;HirmerFotoarchiv,
Munich,figs.10, 11,13, 26, 40;
InstitutAmatllerd'ArtHispanic,
Barcelona,figs. 12, 23, 28, 43;
MargaretLawson,figs.46-62;
Museumof FineArts,Boston,
Bamberg,
fig.33;Staatsbibliothek
fig.3;BruceWhite,fig.5
On the frontand backcovers:Detail
of CardenaBeatusillumination
(1991.232.12b; see p. 40)
NewYork.
PierpontMorganLibrary,
Additionalcredits:Bibliotheque
Nationalede France,Paris,fig.14;
The ClevelandMuseumof Art,
fig.15;CourtauldInstituteof Art,
Universityof London,fig. 24;
NationalMonumentsRecord,
EnglishHeritage,Swindon,fig. 21;
JerrilynD. Dodds,fig.20; The John
RylandsUniversityLibraryof
Manchester,
figs.32, 45;Gabinetto
www.jstor.org
THE
APOCALYPSE
JOACHIM
OF FIORE,
LATE 12TH
CENTURY
1j
I
I,
I\
I- -1
^^\
~~~~~~~I~~~~~1
I
I/
/
I
i'~
I..
^^'^^^^^F~-1
/^v^
/rV
%.^
,u
r,.
, I .4
- 1
'A
/Sn
4'
~~~~~
'.1
r
T/F'
6t-'qlk
, JOP
- ...
:,
"I.
I.j
-I
l--
el
FIGURE
OPPOSITE: Detail of a leaf from the Cardena Beatus manuscript (1991.232.7a; see p. 30)
-5-
3
FIGURE
FIGURE 3
Dragon(detail).Spanish(Le6nCastile,Burgos,monasteryof San
Pedrode Arlanza),1200-1220.
to canvas;6 ft.
Fresco,transferred
MMA,The CloistersCollection,1931
(1931.38.1)
-6
FIGURE 4
CloistersApocalypse.French
(Normandy), ca. 1320.Tempera, gold,
MMA,TheCloistersCollection,1968
(68.174,fol. 14r,detail)
For the most part, the early Beatus images were rendered in
resonant color and with an emblematic simplicity that scholars believe was probably inherited from a lost North African
tradition in Apocalypse manuscripts. The vitality and intensity of these very explicit illustrations, many of them full page
and some spread over two pages, rest on their striking linear
patterns, emphatic contours, and sometimes strident contrasts
of a restricted number of flat, mostly "hot" colors. The midtenth-century Beatus in the Pierpont Morgan Library, New
York,is an outstanding example (see figs. 19, 22, 25, and so on).
Nuance, shading, volume, and perspective (both linear and
atmospheric) were irrelevant to illuminators working in this
early style.
Curiously palatable to these intrepid artists, however, were
certain Islamic motifs and pictorial details, including the
senmurv (part bird, part lion), the eagle pouncing on a gazelle,
the silhouetted tree, the equestrian warrior with streamers
flowing from his diadem, and such architectural elements
as stepped crenellations and horseshoe arches. Several of these
motifs may have been inspired directly by Islamic textiles
and reliefs or conveyed indirectly from earlier Byzantine
and Sasanian works by way of Islamic culture and its wide
Mediterranean inheritance. The architectural imagery may
have referred to Islamic elements already assimilated into
Christian buildings of the tenth century in the northern
7-
FIGURE
Fructuosus(painter;Spanish?).
Ferdinand,
Sancha,and theScribe,
from ThePrayerBookof Ferdinand
and Sancha.Spanish(Leon-Castile,
Sahagun?,
monasteryof Santos
Facundoy Primitivo?),1055.
Temperaon parchment;folio
1214 x 77/8 in. (31 x 20 cm).
BibliotecaUniversitaria
de Santiago
de Compostela(Rs.1,fol.3v,detail)
regions of Spain (see fig. 20 on p. 15).The ongoing hostility between the Christian and Muslim worlds at the time is obviously
not reflected in these borrowings.
Beatus manuscripts in this early style, which erupted near
the borders of Christian Spain, have typically been labeled
"Mozarabic"-a misnomer, because the Mozarabs, meaning
"theArabicized,"were Christians living in the Iberian Peninsula
under direct Muslim rule. To escape persecution many of these
people emigrated to the Christian regions of the north, where
the illustrated Beatus manuscripts were produced. The "Mozarabic"designation has been retained, however, by a number of
scholars for works dating from the tenth century to about
1100.In fact, roughly the last sixty years of this period witnessed
two styles that were juxtaposed and combined: late "Mozarabic"and early Romanesque. Later in the twelfth century, the
Beatus illustrations moved even further away from the insular
8 -
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
Angel,fromthe CardenaBeatus.
MMA(1991.232.3a,detail;seep. 22)
Angel,fromthe CardenaBeatus.
MMA(1991.232.nb,detail;see p. 38)
1030
they had
9 --
FIGURE
KneelingKing,froman Epiphany
relief.Spanish(Le6n-Castile,
Burgos,Cerezode Riotir6n),third
quarterof 12thcentury.Limestone;
h. 491/2in. (125.8cm). MMA,The
CloistersCollection,1930(30.77.6)
FIGURE
FIGURE
10
EnthronedVirginand Child,froman
Epiphanyrelief.Spanish(Le6n-Castile,
Burgos,Cerezode Riotir6n),third
quarterof 12thcentury.Limestone;
h. 541/8in. (137.2cm). MMA,The
CloistersCollection,1930(30.77.8)
10 -
FIGURE
11
ColumnFiguresof SaintsPeter
and Paul,Chapelof SanMiguel,
CdmaraSanta,OviedoCathedral.
Asturias,
Spanish(Le6n-Castile,
Oviedo),1165-75
FIGURE
FIGURE
12
13
ArcaSantaof Oviedo(detail).
Asturias),
Spanish(Le6n-Castile,
latenth or early12thcentury.Black
oakandgildedsilver;h. (overall)
283/4
in. (73cm).CamaraSanta,
OviedoCathedral
Crucifixion
Group.Spanish(Le6nmonasCastile,Galicia-Asturias,
teryof SanAntolinde Toques),
late12thcentury
Not new to Leon-Castile,this composite style had antecedents in Leoneseivories dating from the mid-eleventhto
the earlytwelfthcentury (see fig. 42 on p. 41); in the previouslymentionedPrayerBookof Ferdinandand Sanchaof 1055
(fig.5);and in the gildedsilverreliefsand engravedpanelsof a
largereliquaryin OviedoCathedral(theArcaSanta;see fig.13),
which is now attributedto the late eleventhor earlytwelfth
century.The sources for the style, while speculative,were
probablymultiple.The underlyingstimulusovertime,besides
EarlyChristianRomanand Carolingianart,was undoubtedly
Byzantine,eitherdirectlythroughByzantineobjectsthat had
been broughtto the LatinWest,such as figuredsilksand ivory
icons, or indirectlythroughthe prism of Westernworksthat
had alreadyassimilatediconographicand stylistic elements
fromByzantium.
If we concentrateon the first substyle in the Cardeina
Beatus,it is possibleto considerEnglishmanuscriptpaintingas
suchan intermediatesource.Examplesdatingfromthe second
11
14
15
FIGURE
14
FIGURE
fo
Saint Luke,from a Bible. French
(Burgundy, abbey of Cluny), ca. 1100oo.
Tempera and ink, with gold and
silver, on parchment; 63/4 x 63/8 in.
(17.1 x 16.2 cm). The Cleveland
Museum of Art, Purchase from the
J. H. Wade Fund (1968.190, detail)
12
17
16
D. WIXOM
18
FIGURE 16
FIGURE 17
BookCover,withIconof the
Panel:Byzantine
Crucifixion.
secondhalfof
(Constantinople),
loth century.Ivory,with tracesof
Acanthusplant(Acanthusmollis)
with floweringspikes,grownin the
gardensof The Cloisters
FIGURE 18
Setting:Spanish(Arag6n,Jaca),
Casket(detail).English(Canter-
glass,crystal,and
pseudofiligree,
sapphire,overwood core;lol/2x
71/2in. (26.7 x 19.1cm). MMA, Gift of
J. Pierpont Morgan, 1917(17.190.134)
13 -
Bargello,Florence(LouisCarrand
Collection)
1991.232.1A
FIGURE
19
Beatus).Spanish(Asturias-Le6n,
Le6n),mid-lothcentury.Tempera
and ink on parchment;eachfolio
in. (38.7x 28.5cm).
approx.15/4x 111/4
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York(MSM. 644,fol. 5r)
NOTE:
All Apocalypsequotationsare
from an Englishtranslationof the
LatinVulgateBible(the DouayRheimsversion)as revisedby
BishopRichardChallonerin 174952.Theselectionscorresponddosely
to thosechosenby Beatusof Liebana
to precedethe commentaries.
FIGURE
20
Spanish(Asturias-Le6n),
913
15 -
:
I
1
,:
tS
-i;
*^H
1991.232.1B
Withoutanyinscriptionor
caption,this frontispiece
imageneverthelessrecalls
severalpassagesin the Apocalypsetext:for example,
"Iam Alphaand Omega,
the beginningand the end,
saiththe LordGod,who is,
and who was,and who is
to come,the Almighty"
(Apoc. 1.8).
they thatwashtheirrobes
in the blood of the Lamb").
Polesfor the spearand
spongeused to torment
Christduringthe Passion
riseout of the lamb'sback,
alongwith the taperedstand
of a gold processionalcross.
The Greekletterssuspended
fromthe cross'scrossbar,
alphaand omega,aretoggleboltedin place.The three
nailsof the Crucifixionare
held by one of the angels.
One might at first
supposethatthe elegant
cross,whichdominatesthe
frontispiece,could referto
one of the two highly
reveredwood-and-gold
crossesin the treasuryof
OviedoCathedral.Those
17 -
FIGURE
21
of fresco).English(SaintAnselm's
Chapel,CanterburyCathedral),
ca. 1163
specifically Anglo-Byzantine
patrimony may underlie the
kneeling king, whose forward movement and clinging draperies recall (in
reverse) those of the great
figure of Saint Paul in Saint
Anselm's Chapel, Canterbury
Cathedral (fig. 21).
-18-
if.M4...
*qz,*nfiw
iftwifg,4
11ASL
1991.232.2B
m>mimaw1n
ge,ifttsW.~Ai.fugauem.
wam
fP
LSW ssu?au>(waT^iSu"
~&wpa~zsa
;L-Imwoisn
T^?^X^^1?k;.)
1991.232.2C
4.
:,;,
If,
.I.-,
!'
"X.
1'4;
c0nmmb^uf4gtm.to
ipurmKfeu?t,t
wttuettui.4Udtws
ulcu^uflouun
-#nfeumltn axbWr.$;
aconfunau^e
C Sd;w
clnfo,.fe$ubonm
t orqmc
a
mumdor ucbo&Sid
^oe
oc^ctifs Co^tipu
ti.imtipr
e r
em
tm?
naimuonw
dtdim
fXaw tuctnum
do4n utmur
dtuuftlmm
qu
jlpa
4.tnKwmrd
uni
fium u.u &.rtani
qu
Eq
t
Aumdi
1991.232.3A
n
tno a fm
,quti
pti u1hguuquobIe1o
non
-V. . .
"
tr
uuirquoiu
pa uoiu^,mttx
It -, *.-
uu
aomibi
b1 -m
tifusT wnfmdtn
115tt?ic*usti)it#u*ui'itttt
/
tue
mcAuzr.um~m
panmna<rnmnutmwn
adiiunimnualAdl
APOC. 1.1-6
FIGURE
22
FIGURE
FIGURE
23
24
23 -
1991.232.4A
f 0
APOC. 3.1-6
A t
FIGURE 26
MasterMateo(Spanish[Le6nCastile,Galicia],active1168-88).
FiguresofApostles,RightJamb,
CentralPortal,P6rticode la Gloria,
Cathedralof Santiagode Compostela.Le6n-Castile(Santiagode
Compostela),1168-88
FIGURE 25
MiniaturefromtheMorganBeatus.
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York(MSM. 644,fol. 66r,detail)
25-
wings;the churchtowers
also disruptthe picture's
rectangularity.Finally,
gold has been addedto the
halos and to portions of
the architecture.
Therenderingof drapery
on the Cardefiapageexhibits
a combinationof the dampfoldandpleatedsubstyles,
whichagainrecallscontemporaryarchitectural
sculpturein northernSpain,
especially,in thiscase,the
high-reliefcolumnsculptures
at Santiagode Compostela
(seefig.26).Thechurchin
the Cardefiaillumination,
with its interlockinground
arches,foliatecapitals,and
colonnadedtowers,is representativeof a pan-European
Romanesquearchitecture.
i..~~~
:;* -soI
*
s-B*w
sf
o'*.
;
j..*. E
'**..""..
k.;
:. .'*:^:^o
~,;N
i^
-'/'^
.-. l^i
'.3
b^.ptcdicwtrfcetu -asqui
J.A
4b y a
/D.
imo
d.,udtr
,tcudtr
;S3
tiuspull4nn^ib4r|
.if)onwtbd
flimulmmh^=tttwiimw.^u
a4di<emu.dnenii(4ds.;
|inmbuse
dico
tw^.unbnffAe/'
quAb
anptr,.p14uno fua'dicke,.
Ut44 1
..S
*.?
'.-''.'
",,.'.:-',t
wuemo
i?l,mfq.
n
a.o/t~r.4quuem
IdcatrdlwfvAlwnlqvmt
dc?m tfamiifin14utumaiticimi?l
At
-t$fer<|tt>
- i'^i
'
, '"'g
odrqnquitmndimw.
tSnt
W,'~/.
. _,
^<ow^
qin^^cluetw^nif
* iioAA,onmccogaavzgituone
lesr)au'nmft
d.u acttud^^
V!4querf
4uvba
fib1,ni<
', ,, n
iu(M
Mxladiou
oJ*cUUetf sfts
'"','
oc . quer. .quu.pulf
c
'ihifenA bnomu
itnu rI ?ypic
'tU41ffcfn tuut&cat
quuiiufit#uu?wc'nmo
ni-
rin4ftut. Omw
cmr^4
i'4<fatt WoieaUCeftn
44utVltb1
-.t
*'".'i
.-,?
ilUm.mSp
'**
eW-Lxfiqis ti 44Up0uwlrUr,
m
n
1ma
*n on tiqm
i iumlutfaOcu4
qm uirwU
qus)aqaols
t
ntft 4bdmeialh
; qwniilo
<fu4mn.ltt4tn&Cfmiitutmn
|1w
* *.....
.
.: .i
%
II,.
;
, .-
. .
' ,. I
I
I_I.
1991.232.5B
I__
, -'
APOC. 3.7-13
A t
-27-
llimiii 11111111
11111
- -
I --
FIGURE 27
MiniaturefromtheMorganBeatus.
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York(MSM. 644,fol. 70ov,detail)
FIGURE 28
ApostleFigure,WestFacade,Church
of Santiago.Spanish(Le6n-Castile,
Palencia,Carri6nde los Condes),
1170-80
colors,includingan intense
yellow,of the earliermanuscripthaveagaingivenway
to a less stridentand simpler
color scheme,notwithstanding the additionof gold.The
two figuresnow suggestlow
relief.The damp-foldstyle
of draperyin the figureof
John,which is especially
close to that of the larger
angelson the Majestypage
(seep. 22), maybe compared
to an analogousapostle
figurein Carri6nde los
Condes(see fig. 28).
V9'zfz1'66i
4,
I'
.
-..-:,. J_X
i\,.
-.
44
APOC. 6.9-11
Iconographically,this subject
is anticipated in several of
the earlier Beatus manuscripts, including the one
in the Morgan Library (see
fig. 29). The three registers
containing broad bands of
color, the altarand suspended
votive offerings, the souls
of the dead as doves, the
focal figure of the blessing
Christ, and the clustered
martyrs are common to them
all. The two trees with elegant, curling branches that
flank Christ in the Cardeina
illustration appear to be
unique (and displace the
aforementioned doves from
the middle to the upper
register).
FIGURE
29
FIGURE
30
29
...1..
Xu :0
:::fff0
APOC. 7.1-3
A t
FIGURE
FIGURE
31
FIGURE
32
33
31
v8'zz't66i
APOC. 8.6-7
A t
-33-
FIGURE
34
wa{qnarms
n uib tcItrec
...rnodism.rf.ut.
-XC,
i' p jt/
h
tmiwTnieoTu'
fupma(
' &TO n .3'Itinl au qi
.~~~lq
o^u4.imvrf0t<6cd%imt<.-h
.
-*
1991.232.9B
l, _-isS *
benamir4tegimtittm
4i4awhmn
iW.
,to
..
:z*wwmnua
ups
mIt*utsunl^Tfrn^*WdO
i.
APOC. 8.12-13
A t
13
-35-
FIGURE 35
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York (MS M. 644, fol. 138v,detail)
FIGURE 36
Falcon.SouthernItalian,ca. 1200.
Copperalloy(bronze?),with traces
of gilding;h. 10o3/4in. (27.3 cm).
MMA,The CloistersCollection,1947
(47.101.6o)
..
v..
I'
<''
,*.
|'
..A
'$.
,1'E
c.
'
fdaqlUntcpfau^Wet.*t
,4-
.
noraotmt
zuoiibunodwbutvebm6
obfct
ot
Orku41?upe eaqiwmunio
er
qUU1Wu54ttmiQthubcKitr
b
m auw^iti 0VV4nicmumnrpo
dtituyc
u^b?.ttatbi
oabi
'4:tor~ lnuqwt,ntU,m1u.n..
oculosau1 mgm$ optb1c1n.
nIctwrottmal?0
BtUAnVn.in.
umfquAut4w.^nptaaA1w$qusA
.l.40.qA
.
.,
* *'1 V ,"
XT
i ,:;^
..'/
1991.232.10A
.'
..
APOC. 9.1-6
A t
FIGURE
FIGURE
38
MiniaturefromtheMorganBeatus.
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York (MS M. 644, fol. 14ov, detail)
Theparallelswiththe
MorganBeatus(seefig.38)
aredear.Therandomorientationof the figures,almost
entirelywithoutregardto
gravity,intensifiesthe otherworldlyawesomenessof the
subjectin eachminiature.
TheCardefna
angel,to be read
fromthe side,exemplifiesthe
pleatedsubstyle.He steps
forwardgently,almosthesitantly,withwingsoutspread
andblowson his upturned,
horn(seefig.33).
oliphant-like
The otherfigures-the
undeadrecognizableby their
heavy-liddedor closedeyesassumevariousattitudesof
pleadingor collapse.The
locusts,menacinglystriped
in blackandwhitein the
37
Valveof a MirrorCase.English,
1180-1200. Copper alloy, with
37-
Cardefiaillustration,sting
theirvictimswithlong,segmented,scorpion-liketails.
Theirheadsareseenonly
fromabovein the Morgan
miniature,whereasin the
laterworktheyarealsoseen
in profile.Withtheirfroglike
bodies,animatedarticulation, andnodularspinesand
tails,the Cardefialocusts
seemto resembleno known
creature.Looselycomparable
examplesin art,however,
in
maybe the dragon-lizards
contemporaryRomanesque
metalwork(seefig.37).And
closelyrelatedin the manuscriptitselfarethe profile
dragon'sheadsof Christ's
faldstoolon the Majestypage
(seep. 22).
3:
.:-,a' ..
-- -i
ert
II 4
* 1
...I;
IL
I'
tn-'
_:,
4
:7 .t
KS
I T,
jni:la^.lMwq
wotttl/
J?.^?di<ai.L*fl,ffal,
mtkab<r
1991.232.11B
baW
APOC. 9.13-16
A t
14
15
16
nd the sixthangelsoundedthe
trumpet:and I heard a voice
from the four horns of the
goldenaltar,whichis beforethe
eyesof God,
Saying to the sixth angel, who had the
trumpet:Loose the four angels, who are
boundin the greatriverEuphrates.
And the four angelswereloosed,who were
prepared for an hour, and a day, and
a month,anda year:for to killthe thirdpart
of men.
And the numberof the armyof horsemen
was twenty thousandtimes ten thousand.
AndI heardthe numberof them.
All of the iconographic elements, even the fish in the
Euphrates, mirror those in
the earlier Morgan Beatus
(see fig. 39). One of the fish
in our illustration-the one
with the upturned snoutappears to represent a sturgeon. The celestial arc in the
upper left corner of each
miniature frames a figure
of the enthroned Christ. The
Cardefia Christ, however,
sits on an animal-headed
faldstool and a deep pillow
similar to those beneath
Christ on the Majesty page
(see p. 22). The significance
of the shift from Christ's
open book in the older
Beatus to a closed and
tightly clasped volume in
the Museum's miniature is
open to conjecture.
The Cardefnafigures
have a particular subtlety of
-39-
FIGURE
39
MiniaturefromtheMorganBeatus.
The PierpontMorganLibrary,New
York(MSM. 644,fol. 144r,detail)
FIGURE
40
MasterMateo(Spanish[Le6nCastile,Galicia],active1168-88).
Figureof theApostleJamesthe
Greater,Trumeauof CentralPortal,
P6rticode la Gloria,Cathedralof
Le6n-Castile
Santiagode Compostela.
(Santiagode Compostela),1168-88
qnt Fony
SGcItinztt^
3mucnnw
4einw gtum ..bima
domb
omntponb
gr q
d<nmrn^
41Comrnnqui.
qW1es @
uans quoman & wrwii.,
A(txi?fftfx <cht ^ttTO.twic
mju quo
cc uwtim iw
<lcm<wxltwgdtcfll
nalumdwxr
erfinn
wn
pl1lbuqum
:
n
divfcTII bunw 4ft. v i4t1
m<t?d<mferuisxiw^
ert/
tiomtn
m1mbu
wutum1tlT
tn4rn
wn'0um>.t
ft^*tm. <cCertflqut*. vC
^uV
<
(01m11t*flb*
u1ttm.< Dc .r e
;:.0unmqptttaOb(
... trn
. A,ci
,
,<
w ;v
th. . .
0 D , AX
mtUoo<yunflU
HtiC
An~t.^dl4[TCw1
mcrm
niffgruon
e
iithi,1unm
:.. tiilUt^tlo-,-@
;*...
d &iw4Auct
flet4nr$*
Dm*-*.^-
-^*..t"..^
;, wtne^uMrw<nt>
I
A
r-
1991.232.12B
bonuotu
mut1um
nnu
^-**--.-^^
;**,
09
. "
:'i -.7
APOC. 11.15
FIGURE 41
New
The PierpontMorganLibrary,
York(MSM. 644,fol. 156r,detail)
-41-
FIGURE
42
Giftof J.PierpontMorgan,1917
(17.190.47)
1991.232.13B
APOC. 13.18
TH
FIGURE
43
43-
nwi.
noq'ts
....
Ie
.1 , .
I
In
1991.232.14A
mi
qutfj /
.m
A,__..
.:^
A.......
e4bmbclwfm
0duo
...'''."'
it^^^
....'-"....
no
....
4n1
APOC. 15.1-4
A t
the fine,pen-drawnangel's
wings;the headsshownin
view;and the
three-quarter
45 -
FIGURE
44
FIGURE 45
TheLambof GodPresidingover
theSealingof theElect,fromthe
rewarding.
-
WILLIAM
D. WIXOM
46
The
Techniques and
of
the
Materials
Beatus
A CONSERVATOR'S
47
INQUIRY
117/8inches; thus, they requirednondestructive methods of analysis. No samples were taken unless it was deemed extremely
important to do so, after all of the nondestructive methods had
been exhausted; then, they were taken from smudges, drips, or
loose flakes.
The initial phase of the examination was performed with
the aid of a stereo binocular microscope, a polarizing light
microscope, a light box, a 35mm camera, short- and long-wave
ultraviolet lamps, and a beta plate (a small, radioactive source
that emits beta rays and is used in conjunction with X-ray
film). The methods of photographic documentation included
black-and-white and color ultraviolet visible fluorescence,
black-and-white infrared, false-color infrared, and beta radiography. The information provided in such photographs can
help to distinguish one pigment from another, reveal underdrawing and written notations to the painter, and disclose
characteristics of the support beyond what can be seen with
the eye in normal illumination.
A critical problem from the beginning was that the
Museum did not have positively identified, discrete samples of
medieval materials to use as a control, nor were they readily
available elsewhere when I began the project ten years ago. It
has since become easier to obtain some materials, and a number of excellent reference books have been published. But at
the time, for the purposes of the nondestructive analysis, I
needed to create my own samples of medieval materials in
order to document them with the various photographic techniques and compare them with the relevant portions of the
Beatus leaves, photographed under the same conditions. I also
wanted to examine and compare the new samples and the
medieval illuminations under the microscope.
I began by reading translations of the major treatises on the
art of painting written in the years leading up to 1200, in
order to learn about the techniques of the period. These manuals describe the preparation of materials and the techniques
used for drawing, writing, gilding, dyeing, bookbinding,
glassmaking, metalworking, and even the arts of candymaking and warfare. They include Theophilus, De diversisartibus;
Eraclius, De coloribus et artibus Romanorum;Ibn Badis, Book
of the Staff of the Scribes;and Mappae clavicula (see references
on p. 56).
The language, nomenclature, and methodologies in the
medieval treatises are often not clear or easily interpreted, and
translations may be awkward. Reading other treatises written
as recently as the nineteenth century aided in understanding
many of the earlier procedures. The recipes for inks and dyes
in the later treatises are more descriptive and include more
details. The products resulting from those recipes could then
be compared with the results obtained from the older recipes.
The range of materials cited in the recipes is vast and
includes minerals, earths, and metals; animal parts and products (skin, dung, bones, and urine); insects; and botanical parts
and products (roots, stems, leaves, berries, flowers, gums,
resins, wine, and vinegar). Some of the ingredients were to be
combined or processed. Often they could be found or were
usable only at a specific time of year. Some would spoil if they
were not worked with immediately, while others required time
and purposeful fermentation before they could be used.
My initial response to reading many of the medieval recipes
was that they were outrageous, fantastic, full of imagination,
very difficult to decipher, and probably impossible to follow. A
simple example would be gold. There are many recipes for imitating gold, which was cherished for its brilliance on the page
but expensive to obtain. One of the shortest recipes for gold in
Mappae clavicula is number 18: "Making proven gold. Two
parts of armenium, one part of zonitidos. Grind them all, add
a fourth part of bull's dung and an equal part of cadmia. Melt
it and it will be rather heavy. Do the same thing also in copper."
Perhaps easier to visualize is number 44, which appears to be
for a gold ink, given the final directive: "Another recipe for
gold. Mix native sulfur, the skin of pomegranate, the insides of
figs, a little fissile alum, and a liquid gum. After adding a little
saffron, write."
As I gained familiarity with the treatises, I began to gather
some of the more common ingredients and to make the more
frequently mentioned colors. I started with medieval verdigris,
for which there were a number of different recipes. The laboratory's fume hood and my own kitchen became medieval
workshops. When a scrap of twisted copper wire left in red
wine for a few months produced a beautiful green precipitate,
I was thrilled. I wanted to compare that green to other recipes
with copper and to other inorganic and organic greens. The
variety of colors obtainable from copper, even beyond greens
and blues, was remarkable (see fig. 46), as was the range of
-48-
FIGURE 46
Samplesof colorsfromrecipes
and experimentswith copperand a
varietyof otheringredients
FIGURE 47
47
48
-49-
tA
MEDIEVAL ILLUMINATED
MANUSCRIPT
was
made in a series of steps, many of which left
physical evidence that we can still see. The
Metropolitan'sleaves from the CardefnaBeatus
do not forma gathering,or completeconsecutiveunit,because
the individualleavesand one full folio sheet,or bifolium,were
removedmore than a centuryago from variouslocations in
FIGURE
49
50
Contactprintof a betaradiograph
of partof the Antichristtable(see
p. 42), revealing a radiotransparent
spinalarea(the lighterpassage
under the word ANTICHRIST)
and
veinsbranchingoff it to eitherside
49
50
-50-
52
FIGURE
FIGURE
51
52
Makinghawthornink
53
FIGURE
53
Smallguidelettera at the
edgeof a manuscriptpage
51
guidelinesshows the composition of all three to be primarily lead and tin. This informationcorrelateswith the Mappae
clavicula recipe for a "leadenwriting"(number 92E): "Melt
togethertwo parts of tin and three parts of lead. When you
havedonethis,polishit, fileit, andgrindit.Thenaddwater-glue
and polish."It also conformsto Theophilus'srecommendation
that a lead or tin metalpointbe used in a compass.
The basic text ink of the Beatus commentaryis a rich
brown.We do not knowwhetheror how much this color may
havechangedoverthe centuries,but thereis no evidenceof the
ink's having eaten throughor into the parchment,as sometimes occurswith iron gallink.I trieda numberof ink recipes
from the treatisesand noted a similarityin appearanceand
compositionbetweenthe Beatusink and the hawthornbark
inkfromTheophilus.Thislabor-intensive
reciperequirespicking hawthornbranchesat a specifictime in the spring,drying
the branchesfor severalweeks,poundingthe thornsto remove
the bark,soakingthe barkin waterfor eight days,and boiling
the mixturedown (see fig.52). It is then cookeddowna second
time with some wine.
Becauseuncertaintiesremainaboutwhatkind of ink hawthorn actuallywas, and in particularwhat was meant by the
ingredientatramentum,I made two kinds of hawthornink.
Atramentum
is usuallytranslatedas ironvitriol(metalsulfate),
but it couldalsomeanpreviouslyprepareddryink froma variety of preparations,includingthose basedon tannin,carbon,
and/or metal sulfate.Some of the confusionmay have arisen
becausethe finaldirectionin Theophilusstatesthat if the ink
is not blackenough,a red-hotironpokercouldbe throwninto
it. One mightthinkthatthiswasto thickenit or addsome iron,
but accordingto the Museum'slate armorerRobertCarroll,it
would have servedthe purpose of carbonizingthe material.
The XRFand SEM-EDSequipmentused at the time of this
studydid not havethe capabilityof detectingcarbon.
-51-
Elemental analysis by Mark Wypyski reveals many similarities between the Beatus ink and the sample of hawthorn ink
made without metal sulfate. Initial experimentation with our
infrared video camera (a FIND-R-SCOPE) shows that, as is
characteristic of bark inks, both the hawthorn ink and the
Beatus ink disappear with the filtration at 850 nanometers. In
terms of the manuscript's symbolism, it would be interesting if
the text ink had been made from hawthorn bark. According to
some legends, the hawthorn tree (genus Crataegus) was the
source of Christ's crown of thorns. For centuries, the plant was
thought to be holy and to offer protection. Although this kind
of symbolism is not mentioned in the treatises, it would have
been a clever touch to write a commentary on the book of the
Apocalypse in an ink that legend finds so sacred.
Besides the dark brown commentary text, there are also
rubrics (passages written in red), as well as red and blue ornamental capital letters. The rubrics consist of epigraphs, short
explanatory headers, and the biblical material taken directly
from the Apocalypse. The rubrics in the Cardefia Beatus
appear to have been written in vermilion. The large capital letters at the beginning of each section of text alternate between
red and blue, with a decorative acanthus leaf in the opposite
color flourishing within them. They are usually two or three
lines high.
On the verso of the folio reproduced on page 28 there is
a small, red letter a at the edge of the parchment to the left of
the ornamental capital letter A, which served as a guide for
the rubricator (see fig. 53). On the verso of the next folio in the
Museum's sequence, small letters in faint brown ink at the very
edge of the parchment mark the beginning and end of the
rubric at the bottom of the second column of text. Most likely
there were more notations for rubrics in the manuscript,
but because the leaves were cut down, some of this evidence
was lost.
FIGURE 54
Looseunderdrawing
on the left
shoulderof the angelto the leftof the
lambon the frontispiece(see p. 16)
FIGURE 55
Morepreciseunderdrawing
defining
the lamb'sheadon the frontispiece
55
FIGURE 56
57
56
52-
FIGURE
58
Detailof Christ'shandgrasping
a book (see p. 22), with gold
extendingbeyondthe original
bole andblackink overlapping
the leaf
FIGURE
59
60
7A
S INDICATEDABOVE,the paintingof the miniatureswould have been one of the last stagesin
the creation of the manuscript.The Cardefna
Beatusdesigns are striking,and the colors are
verybold andbright.Toinvestigatethis aspectof the work,the
colorswerefirstevaluatedon the basisof the followingvisual
characteristics:overall appearance,texture, matte or glossy
surface,opacity or transparency,and density.The paintings
appearto havebeen accomplishedwith a limitedpalette,with
the same colors repeatingon differentleaves.Generally,the
painted areas are dense and opaque and look similar to
gouacheof today,whileothercolorsareclearand transparent.
More preciseidentificationof the pigmentsand lakesin the
manuscriptis difficult.Colorsthat appearsimilarmay in fact
be different,some colorsmaybe mixtures,and, as mentioned
earlier,some colorsmayhavealteredovertime.
In WilliamD. Wixom'sintroductoryessay and extended
captions,visual examinationof the Metropolitan'sCardeina
53-
60
flat,and "Byzantine"
style (Wixom'sdamp-foldmanner).The
garmentsprovidethe figureswith some degreeof volume by
meansof the prominentwhiteovalssurroundedby concentric,
alternatingbands of blue, red, green,and yellow.Despitethis
colorfulpattern,the styleimpliesthat the fabricis not colored
but white. In this first group,the top portions of the angels'
wings eitherare empty or containbrownpen lines indicating
feathers,and the facesarerenderedsimply,with minimallines
(seefig.59).
Inthesecondgroupof leaves,whichexhibitWixom'spleated
substyle(see pp. 16, 21, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 44), the figuresare
clothedin garmentsmade up of severalsolid-coloredfabrics.
The tops of the angels'wings in thesepaintingscontainone of
threecoloredpatterns:overlappingscallops,overlappingscallopswitha bluedot at thetop of eachscallop,or cross-hatching.
Ingeneral,a considerableamountof descriptivedetailworkwas
accomplishedwithbothpen andbrush,suchas additionallines
andbrushstrokesaroundthe eyesthat definethe shapesof the
eyeballs,eyelids,andsockets(see fig.60).
In comparingresultsof the nondestructivephotographic
documentation,an interestingmaterialdifferenceshows up
betweenthe two groupsin the use of the colorgreen.The trees
FIGURE
61
False-colorinfraredphotographof
the folio reproducedon page28, from
the firstgroup,showingthe greentrees
as magenta
FIGURE
62
False-colorinfraredphotographof
the folio reproducedon page32, from
the secondgroup,showingthe green
treesas blue
61
62
54
MARGARET LAWSON
Notes
p. 3 "whatis hidden"
Joachimof Fiore,Expositioin
(Venice,1527;reprint,
Apocalypsim
Frankfurtam Main,1964),fol. 3r;
citedin BernardMcGinn,"John's
Apocalypseand the Apocalyptic
in TheApocalypse
in the
Mentality,"
MiddleAges,editedby RichardK.
Emmersonand BernardMcGinn
(Ithaca,1992),p. 19.
p. 6 delightfulheraldicpurpose
Regardingthe heraldicaspectof the
Arlanzafrescoesandfor relevant
comparisons,seeWalterCahn,
"TheFrescoesof SanPedrode
in TheCloisters:
Studiesin
Arlanza,"
Honorof theFiftiethAnniversary,
editedby ElizabethC. Parkerand
MaryB.Shepard(NewYork,1992),
pp. 87,95,103.
on John'stext
p. 6 latercommentaries
Therehavebeen manycommentatorson the Apocalypsetext or on
portionsof it. Amongthe most
importantactivein this exegetical
tradition,beyondthose mentioned
on p. 7, arethe following:
Victorinus,bishopof Pettau,
Pannonia(modernStyria,Austria),
d. ca.303;Cassiodorus,b. ca. 485
in Scyllacium(Calabria,Italy),d.
ca.580in Vivarium;Venerable
Bede,b. ca. 672/73in Northumbria,
England,d. probably735in same
region;AmbrosiusAntpertus,
active758-67in Benevento
(Lombardy,
Italy),d. 781;Alcuin,
b. ca. 735in Northumbria,d. 804 in
Tours,France;Haimoof Auxerre
[France],activeca. 840,d. ca. 875;
Berengaudusof Ferrieres[France],
activesecondhalfof 9th century;
Anselmof Laon,d. 1117in Laon,
France;Rupert,abbotof Deutz,
Germany,b. ca. 1075probablyin
Liege(present-dayBelgium),d. 1129
in Deutz (on the Rhine,opposite
Cologne);and Joachimof Fiore,b.
ca. 1130in Celico,d. 1201/2in Fiore
(Calabria).ForJoachim,see the epigraphof this Bulletin.
p. 7 "theillustratedtext"
JohnWilliams,EarlySpanish
Illumination(NewYork,
Manuscript
1977),p. 24.
p. 7 lostNorthAfricantradition
SeeJohnWilliams,TheIllustrated
Beatus:A Corpusof the Illustrations of theCommentary
on the
vol. 1 (London,1994),
Apocalypse,
p.32.
p. 8 andearlyRomanesque
SeeMireilleMentre,Illuminated
Manuscripts
of MedievalSpain,
translatedby JeniferWakelyn
(Londonand NewYork,1996),p. 227.
p. 8 in theimmediatevicinity
Theoldestpreserveddepictionof a
medievalscriptoriumappearsin the
Beatusmanuscriptoriginatingfrom
the monasteryof Tabara(Leon),
dated 970. Emeterius, the scribe in
TheMetropolitanMuseumof Art,
NewYork,1993),p. 301.
III'sbullof1163
p. 11Alexander
SeeAnnieShaver-Crandell
and
PaulaL.Gerson,ThePilgrim's
GuidetoSantiagode Compostela:
A
Gazetteer
(London,1995),p. 150.
p. 12 immensethirdchurchat Cluny
SeeJohnWilliams,"Le6nandthe
Beginningsof the SpanishRomanesque,"in ArtofMedievalSpain,
p. 167.FerdinandundertookEuropeanizinginitiatives,including
an alliancewithCluny,whichhe admiredforits spirituality.
AlfonsoVI,
Ferdinand's
son,wasalsoa heavy
supporterof Cluny.Afterthe death
of Alfonso'swifeAgnes,a daughterof
the dukeof Aquitaine,he married
Constance,a daughterof the dukeof
Burgundyandnieceof AbbotHugh
of Cluny.SeealsoMarilynStokstad,
in theAge
Santiagode Compostela
(Norman,
of theGreatPilgrimages
Okla.,1978),p. 17.
p. 12 Adoration
of theMagiminiature
SeeWilliamD.Wixom,"Leavesfrom
a BeatusManuscript,"
in TheGloryof
ArtandCultureof the
Byzantium:
MiddleByzantineEra,A.D. 843-1261,
editedby HelenC. Evansand
WilliamD.Wixom(exh.cat.,The
MetropolitanMuseumof Art,New
York,1997),p. 479.
thechoirfromthe
p. 15separating
naveSeeJerrilynnD. Dodds,
Architecture
andIdeologyin Early
MedievalSpain(UniversityPark,Pa.,
1989),pp.47-77.
p. 17namelythespearandthesponge
SeeJohnWilliams,"Toursandthe
EarlyMedievalArtof Spain,"in
in HonoremCarl
Florilegium
Contextum,
Nordenfalk
Octogenarii
editedby PerBjurstrom,
Nils-Goran
Hokby,andFlorentineMutherich
(Stockholm,1987),pp.197-208.
p. 17spear,sponge,andflankingangels
SeeWilhelmKoehler,Die Schulevon
Tours,vol.i of Die karolingischen
Miniaturen(Berlin,1930),pls.35,46g,
56b,65g,83,89n.
p. 18angelstandsat theleft
In the completemanuscript,beforeit
wasunboundanddispersed-and as
reconstructedin the facsimileedition published in 2001 (see Beatode
Liebanain the list of referencesthat
follows)-there wereactuallyeight
interveningpagesbetweenthe two
reproducedon pp. 2o and21. One
mayassumethattheseeightpages
werein facttwo bifolia,foldedand
placedone insidethe otherandthen
insidethe Museum'sbifoliumbefore
beingsewntogether,likea signature
55 -
of a book.Thus,medievalreaders
of the CardenaBeatuswouldnot
haveencounteredthe spreadaswe
haveshownit here(oppositethe
Adorationof the Magiminiature
wasa laterfolio in the genealogy
sequence).Thespreaddoes,however,
faithfullyreproducethe objectnow
ownedby the Museum-that is, one
sideof the bifolium(1991.232.2b,c).
source
p. 43 basedon an unidentified
SeeJohnWilliams,A Spanish
TheMorganBeatus
Apocalypse:
(NewYork,1991),p. 195.
Manuscript
table
p. 43 missingitscomparable
WilhelmNeussreproducednine similarrectangular
tablesfromother
desHl.
examplesin DieApokalypse
und
Johannesin deraltspanischen
altchristlichen
Bibel-Illustration,
vol.2 (Muinster
in Westfalen,1931),
pls.145-47.
p. 45 "thoseoutsidehischurch"
SeeWilliams,SpanishApocalypse,
p. 198.
p. 45 theeffortsof a copyist
In keepingwith my earlyconviction, the derivativenatureof the
ManchesterBeatusillustrationshas
alsobeenproposed,on the basisof
quitedifferentevidence,byAngela
FrancoMatain "Illustrations
in the
SanPedrode CardenaBeatus,"
p. 118.
p. 46 theendof197o
SeeKonradHoffmann,TheYear
1200 (exh.cat.,TheMetropolitan
Museumof Art,NewYork,1970).For
Spanishworks,see nos.51,132,238.
p. 46 essentialto thiseffort
Selectionsfromthe Museum's
CardenaBeatusfolios areexhibited on a rotatingbasisin the treasuriesof TheCloistersand/orin
the galleriesof medievalartin the
mainbuilding.
p. 48 a gardenat home
Readersareencouragedto visit
thewonderfulmedievalgardensat
TheCloistersin FortTryonPark,
Manhattan,wheremanyof the plants
thatI grewmaybe seen,plusmany
more.Toobtainseedsandgrow
plants,seethe supplierslistedin
RitaBuchanan's
A Weaver's
Garden:
GrowingPlantsforNaturalDyesand
Fibers(NewYork,1999).
SelectedReferencesfor
the CardefnaBeatus
SelectedReferencesfor
the ConservationProject
In ChronologicalOrder
In AlphabeticalOrder
et dessins."In Paul
"Miniatures
Leprieur,AndrePerate,and P.Andre
Lemoisne,Catalogueraisonnede
la collectionMartinLeRoy,vol. 5,
pp. 131-40.Paris.
1931.WilhelmNeuss.DieApokalypse
desHI.Johannesin deraltspanischen
Bibel-Illustration
undaltchristlichen
(dasProblemderBeatus-Handvol.1,no. 19,pp.51-53;
schriften),
vol.2,p. 41,fig.60.Munsterin
Westfalen.
1993.EstherAlonsoCardona.
al BeatodelMuseo
"Aproximaci6n
Arqueol6gicoNacionalde Madrid."
BoletindelMuseoArqueol6gico
Nacional(Madrid)ii, pp.63-78.
1993.JohnWilliams."Commentary
on the Apocalypseby Beatusof
In TheArtof Medieval
Liebana."
Spain,A.D. 500-1200, no. 153,
pp. 300-301, color ills. Exh. cat.,
1997.WilliamD. Wixom."Leaves
In The
froma BeatusManuscript."
Artand Culture
Gloryof Byzantium:
of theMiddleByzantineEra,A.D.
1976.PeterK.Klein.Deraltere
Vitr.14-1derBiblioteca 843-1261,editedby HelenC. Evans
Beatus-Kodex
andWilliamD. Wixom,no. 315,
Nacionalzu Madrid:Studienzur
undderspanischen pp. 478-79,colorills.Exh.cat.,The
Beatus-Illustration
deso10.
Buchmalerei
Jahrhunderts,
MetropolitanMuseumof Art,
NewYork.
pp.412,414.StudienzurKunstgeschichte,vol.8. Hildesheimand
1999.WilliamD. Wixom."Leaves
NewYork.
In
from a BeatusManuscript."
Mirrorof the MedievalWorld,
1986.LuisRevenga,ed. LosBeatos,
editedby WilliamD. Wixom,no. 92,
no. 16,pp. 52,58,115,ill. Exh.cat.,
pp. 77-80, colorills.Exh.cat.,The
BibliotecaNacional,Madrid.
MetropolitanMuseumof Art,
1991.Actas[del]SimposiointernaNewYork.
cionalsobre"0 P6rticoda Gloriae
C6dicedel
2001. Beatode Liebana:
a artedoseutempo,"
Santiagode
Monasteriodi SanPedrode Cardena,
3-8 Outubrode1988.
Compostela,
facsimileed.,
passim.Reconstructed
[Santiagode Compostela.]Essays:
with textvol. in Spanishand English.
JoaquinYarzaLuaces,"Laminiatura
Translated
en Galicia,Le6n,y Castillaen tiemby AnneBartonde Mayor.
2 vols. Barcelona.
pos de MaestroMateo,"pp.323-24,
figs.5,13,15.JohnWilliams,"ImagiFORTHCOMING (2002).
John
neriaApocalipticaen el romanico
Beatus:
Williams.TheIllustrated
tardioespanol,"
pp.371-80.
A Corpusof theIllustrations
of the
on theApocalypse,
Commentary
1992.WilliamD. Wixom."Leaffrom
TheTwelfthand
vol. 5;Catalogue:
In "Recent
a BeatusManuscript."
no. 21,withfull
Centuries,
Acquisitions:A Selection,1991-1992," Thirteenth
LondonandTurnhout,
Museumof Art
TheMetropolitan
bibliography.
Bulletin50, no. 2 (Fall),pp. 20-21,
Belgium.
coverand colorill.
-56
Buchanan,Rita,ed. Dyesfrom
Nature.Plantsand Gardens,Brooklyn
BotanicGardenRecord46, no. 2.
Brooklyn,1990.
Cannon,John,and Margaret
Cannon.DyePlantsand Dyeing.
Illustratedby GretelDalby-Quenet.
Portland,Ore.,1994.
de Hamel,Christopher.Scribesand
Illuminators.
MedievalCraftsmen
series.London,1992.
Feller,RobertL.,ElisabethWest
FitzHugh,andAshokRoy,eds.
A Handbookof
Artists'Pigments:
TheirHistoryand Characteristics.
3 vols.Washington,D.C.,1986-97.
Acknowledgments
WilliamD. Wixomwishesto
thankhis severalreadersfor their
commentsand suggestions.HIeis
especiallyindebtedto Professor
JohnWilliamsof the Universityof
Pittsburghand to colleaguesat The
MetropolitanMuseumof Art:Peter
Barnet,BarbaraBoehm,Lisbeth
and Charles
Castelnuovo-Tedesco,
Little.Eachis exoneratedfor any
that
errorsand misinterpretations
mayhaveappearedhere.He is particularlygratefulto PeterBarnet
andJoanHolt for theirencouragement of the projectand to Jennifer
Bernsteinfor her expertand always
cheerfulediting.
MargaretLawsonwouldespeciallyliketo thankBillWixomfor
providingthe challenge,HelenOtis
forhersupportat the project'sinceptionandduringthe study,and
MarjorieShelleyforhersupportin
thelaterstages.Manydepartments
andindividualsat theMuseum(both
currentandformerstaffandfellows)
providedgenerousassistance,includLevey,Martin.MediaevalArabic
andItsRelationto
ingMaryanAinsworth,AnnBaldwin,
Bookmaking
and Pharmacology. MartinBansbach,PeterBarnet,Lisa
EarlyChemistry
Barro,JenniferBernstein,Barbara
[Includestranslationsof portions
of the
of Ibn Badis.] Transactions
Boehm,ChristineBrennan,Barbara
AmericanPhilosophicalSociety,n.s.,
Bridgers,the lateRobertCarroll,Lee
AnnDaffner,HelenEvans,Betty
52,pt. 4. Philadelphia,1962.
Fiske,TonyFrantz,ThomasFrontini,
Merrifield,MaryP.Medievaland
RobertGoldman,ShelleyGreenspan,
Treatises
on theArtsof
Renaissance
JoanHolt,NobukoKajitani,Deirdre
Painting:OriginalTextswithEnglish
Larkin,ChuckLittle,SusanMoody,
Translations.
[Includestranslationof
RachelMustalish,DouglasNishiEraclius.]Mineola,N.Y.,1967.
mura,ChristinePaulocik,Stewart
Pollens,ElenaPhipps,BruceSchwarz,
Reed,R[onald].AncientSkins,
YanaVan
DickStone,EileenTravell,
London
and Leathers.
Parchments,
Dyke,TomVinton,GeorgeWheeler,
and NewYork,1972.
EdWiddows,KarinWillis,Mark
Wypyski,andAkikoYamazaki-Kleps.
Smith,CyrilStanley,and JohnG.
OlgaSouzaMarder,JudithReed,
A
Hawthorne.MappaeClavicula:
andDorrieRosenat theNewYork
LittleKeyto theWorldof Medieval
BotanicalGardenin the Bronxproof the
Transactions
Techniques.
videdhelpfulinformation,as did
AmericanPhilosophicalSociety,n.s.,
DanKushelandChrisTahkatthe
64, pt. 4. Philadelphia,1974.
StateUniversityCollegeat Buffalo.
Theophilus[pseud.].OnDiversArts: Theauthoris alsoextremelygrateful
to EstherAlonsoCardona,Domion
MedievalTreatise
TheForemost
Metalwork. niqueCardon,AbigailQuandt,and
Painting,Glassmakingand
JohnWilliams.
Translated
byJohnG.Hawthorneand
CyrilStanleySmith.NewYork,1979.
Kushel,Dan."PhotodocumentaProcedural
tion forConservation:
GuidelinesandPhotographic
PaperpreConceptsandTechniques."
sentedattheannualmeetingof the
AmericanInstituteforConservation,
SanFrancisco,
May1980.
~??zi?'???
iiiW
m!~,
~,~