Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
228
n = 0, 1
4
229
Synthesis
5
Scheme 1
Tetrahydropyridazines 6 with a 6-membered B-ring were prepared by
condensation of the hydrazines with substituted 4-chlorobutyrophenones. FriedelCrafts acylation of substituted benzenes with 4-chlorobutyrl chloride provided the
requisite butyrophenones (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
1,4-Dihydropyridazines 7 were prepared by condensation of the pyrimidinylhydrazines with benzoylpropionic acids to give pyridazinones. Reduction with one
equivalent of lithium aluminum hydride (4) gave the intermediate aminal. Subsequent
treatment with methanesulfonyl chloride in pyridine afforded the desired 1,4dihydropyridazines 7 (Scheme 3).
230
Scheme 3
The synthesis of 1,6-dihydropyridazines is shown in Scheme 4. Condensation
of the pyrimidinylhydrazines with ,-diketones gave the corresponding hydrazones
as mixtures of E/Z isomers. Treatment of the mixtures with sodium hydride followed
by addition of vinyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (5) provided the 1,6-dihydro
pyridazines 8. The latter cyclization reaction did not work when the R group was 2pyridyl or 2-furanyl.
Bf
Scheme 4
231
Scheme 5
The preparation of pyrazolines 5 in which the phenyl group is replaced by a
benzyl group is shown in Scheme 6. The requisite chloroketones were prepared by
coupling reactions between benzyl bromide and 3-chloropropionyl chloride catalyzed
by a palladium reagent and zinc powder (<5). Subsequent condensation with the
pyrimidinylhydrazine provided the desired benzylpyrazolines 10.
10
Scheme 6
232
12
Scheme 7
Biological Data
The fungicidal activities of these compounds are shown in the Tables I-IV. The
Tables show preventive control though some of these compounds also demonstrated
curative efficacy (data not shown). The greenhouse disease control data were used to
develop structure-activity relationships. Many heterocycles in place of the pyrimidine
were also prepared via Schemes 1-6. These heterocycles include pyridine,
quinazoline, benzothiazole, benzoxazole, and pyridazine. The activities of these
compounds were generally less than those of the corresponding pyrimidines and the
data is not presented.
Structure-Activity Relationships
For the -ring, pyrimidine gave the best activity. For substitution on the pyrimidine
ring, 4,6-dimethyl- was better than 4-methyl and unsubstituted pyrimidine in overall
fungicidal activity when the rest of the molecules are otherwise the same.
233
For the B-ring, tetrahydropyridazines (Table II) gave better activity than
pyrazolines (Table I) and tetrahydrodiazepines (Table III). Among the 6-member
rings, the 1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyridazine ring was better than the two types of dihydropyridazines (Table IV)
In the pyrazoline series, the methylene group between the aromatic ring and firing afforded compounds at comparable fungicidal activities to those without the
methylene. However, since the synthesis was more difficult, only a few compounds
were prepared (Table I).
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Ri
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
H
Me
Me
R
H
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
H
H
H
Me
2
R
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Me
H
H
H
3
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
Ar
1-naphthalenyl
1-naphthalenyl
2-Me-Ph
2-CI-Ph
3-CI-Ph
3-Me-Ph
4-Me-Ph
2-OMe-Ph
Ph
3-Me-Ph
3-Me-Ph
3-Me-Ph
WPM WLR
NT
NT
25
85
62
92
84
90
95
63
53
20
45
39
28
36
91
99
89
96
89
98
98
98
NT - Not Tested.
WPM
WLR
WFR
WGB
RCB
234
For the aromatic group, phenyl appeared to be superior to heterocyclic
aromatic groups. In the tetrahydropyridazine series (Table II), alkyl and halo
substitutions on the phenyl ring were better than alkoxy and trifluoromethyl groups in
overall activities. A methyl or ethyl group as R group in the structure shown in Table
II also improved the activity. Compound 14 from Table II was the most active
compound and was therefore tested in the field. Unfortunately, the promising
greenhouse activity of this class of chemistry was not maintained in the field.
Ar
R,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
R
R
H
H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me H
Me Me
Me Me
Me Et
Me Me
Me H
Me H
2
Ar
Ph
Ph
4-F-Ph
3-CI-Ph
4-CI-Ph
4-OH-Ph
4-OMe-Ph
4-OPh-Ph
2-Me-Ph
3-Me-Ph
4-Me-Ph
4-n-Pr-Ph
4-teff-Bu-Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
3-Me-Ph
3-CF -Ph
2-thienyl
3
235
Table III. Biological data
X
1
2
3
4
4-CI
4-OMe
4-Me
H
89
60
79
96
83
66
70
83
100
39
41
33
*95
99
100
100
71
73
82
83
For compounds # 1 -4
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
R
H
H
H
H
H
H
4-Me-Ph
Ph
4-Me-Ph
4-OMe-Ph
H
4-Me
4-OMe
3,4-diMe
H
3,4-diMe
4-Me
H
4-Me
4-OMe
96
89
66
91
0
60
57
24
NT
84
99
100
98
98
97
83
0
77
80
88
62
74
85
NT
0
0
0
0
48
61
NT
97
100
100
3
95
0
78
58
35
60
100
99
90
13
67
0
24
32
0
236
Conclusions
The pyrimidinyltetrahydropyridazines discussed demonstrated broad spectrum of
fungicidal activity, especially against wheat foot rot, wheat glum blotch and rice blast,
in the greenhouse. Dimethyl substitution on the pyrimidinyl group boosted the
fungicidal activity. The greenhouse activity was not maintained in the field.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank those biologists who contributed to this work. We would
also like to thank John Daub, Ed Adams, Debbie Frasier and Simon Xu for sharing
ideas in this area of chemistry.
Literature Cited
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.