Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Recently, environmental concerns have placed increasing pressure on the CO2 intensive iron and steel
industries to further optimise operation towards higher
productivity and lower consumption of reducing agents.
At the same time, high demand for iron ore has made
new iron ores with lower grades and more complex
chemistries viable in production. In order to further
optimise blast furnace operation, understanding of the
chemical and physical interaction between the iron
bearing material and non-iron components is of primary
importance. One of the components added in the blast
furnace charge is calcite, both in the form of a lump slag
former and as an additive incorporated into agglomerated iron ore units. In Scandinavia the main iron ore
source is pellets. In the early 1970s, growing attention
turned to fluxed or basic pellets. These labels were given
to the pellets, as the idea was that basic additives such as
CaO and MgO would help to flux impurities into the
slag phase in the blast furnace.1
The presence of CaO in the pellets changes the
reaction kinetics drastically, as formation of liquid slags
and liquid calcium ferrite start during induration of the
pellets.2,3 This helps liquid sintering and densification of
the pellets during induration, but also lowers the slag
melting point during reduction.4 The CaO in this system
474
2014
VOL
41
NO
Semberg et al.
Sample preparation
Method
In this study, reduction tests were carried out isothermally in a tubular furnace (see Fig. 1) at 500, 600, 700,
800 and 900uC. The gas composition was adjusted
according to Table 1, which thermodynamically limits
reduction to magnetite between 500 and 700uC, and to
wustite at 800900uC. With the aim to study reactions in
a qualitative rather than quantitative way, all experiments were run for 2 h, even though the time to reach
equilibrium for different iron oxides is different at
different temperatures. The 800 and 900uC experiments
were also run at CO : CO2510 : 90 to limit the reduction to the magnetite even at these higher temperatures.
The tubular furnace used was preheated to the desired
temperature and the samples were then inserted and
preheated for 2?5 min in nitrogen gas. The CO/CO2
mixture was then introduced at a rate of 12 L min21.
Analysis
The samples were characterised before and after
reduction by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and
X-ray diffraction (XRD). SEM analysis was facilitated
by a Hitachi VPSEM S3400N with a Bruker quantax
800 detector and a Zeiss Merlin with an Oxford X-Max
3000 detector. The pellets were mounted in epoxy resin
and cut approximately in the middle with a thin diamond saw. Finally, they were polished down to 1 mm
fineness with diamond pastes before gold coating. The
aim with the SEM analysis was to obtain a representative view of the pellets from each experiment. As chemistry and morphology in the pellets was found to vary
across the pellet radius, images and point analyses were
taken both in the pellet periphery and in the core.
Images and point analyses were collected from three
different pellets in each sample to obtain representative
results. XRD analysis was carried out on pulverised
samples using a Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer.
Nomenclature
Temp./uC
32/68
32/68
32/68
32/68
32/68
10/90
10/90
500
600
700
800
900
800
900
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
FeO
FeO
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
C4 F7
CaO4 :Fe2 O3 7
C2 W1:6 F7
CF2
CaO:Fe2 O3 2
C3 WF7
CaO3 :FeO:Fe2 O3 7
C4 WF4
CaO4 :FeO:Fe2 O3 4
C4 WF8
CaO4 :FeO:Fe2 O3 8
Fe
SiO2
MgO
CaO
Al2O3
TiO2
V2O5
S Na2OzK2O
70.88
0.32
3.63
66.57
0.71
0.54
51.64
0.62
0.20
0.70
0.68
2.94
0.13
53.35
6.43
2.94
0.34
0.35
0.240
0.10
0.175
3.30
2014
VOL
41
NO
475
Semberg et al.
CWF CaO:FeO:Fe2 O3
C2 F
CaO2 :Fe2 O3
C2 S
CaO2 :SiO2
Results
Oxidation
Figures 24 show the oxidised pellet cross section in the
pellet periphery, mid-radius and centre respectively. Three
phases are identified in the X-ray diffractogram of the
pellet (see Fig. 5), hematite, C4F7, (alternatively C3WF7
or C2W1?6F7) and C2S. This result is different from most
previous experiments in which the commonly reported
ferrite has been CF2. The calcium ferrite of the sample is
often sectioned into a darker part rich in magnesium and
a lighter part where calcium dominates (see Fig. 2), and
will hereafter be labelled C4F7. The SEM-EDS results
presented in Figs. 6 and 7 show the composition of the
calcium ferrite phase in a number of analysis points in the
peripheral region as well as in the core of the pellet. In
476
2014
VOL
41
NO
Semberg et al.
Reduction
Table 3 summarises the reactions occurring in the calcite
pellet in the different experiments of this study. The
reduction of the samples shifts the equilibrium iron
oxide phase from hematite (after oxidation) to magnetite
(reduction at 500700uC) and finally to wustite (reduction at 800900uC). Two extra tests were also performed
with a leaner reduction gas yielding magnetite also at
800 and 900uC. No diffusion of calcium from the calcium ferrite was detected at reduction with magnetite,
but at reduction to wustite, the calcium dissolved into the
crystal structure, so that calciowustite formed. The calciowustite reaction is very slow at 800uC and occurred
only in the pellet peripheral zone. At 900uC, the calciowustite formation is almost complete.
Physical appearance
Table 3 Summary of reactions occurring in calcite pellet during reduction at different temperatures
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
Temp./uC
CO/CO2
Observed reaction
500
600
700
800
900
800
900
32/68
32/68
32/68
32/68
32/68
10/90
10/90
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
FeO
FeO
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
HematiteRporous magnetite
HematiteRporous magnetite. C4F7 breaks down
HematiteRporous magnetite. C4F7 not detected
Slow diffusion of calcium from calcium ferrite to form calciowustite
Formation of porous calciowustite
Formation of dense magnetite. No calcium dissolution
Formation of dense magnetite. No calcium dissolution
2014
VOL
41
NO
477
Semberg et al.
Discussion
X-ray diffraction results of this study indicated that the
main binding phase in pellets with large additions of
calcite is C3WF7, C4F7 or C2W1?6F7 and not CF2, which
is the phase commonly reported in previous literature.
Previously, it has been shown that the presence of
foreign elements such as Mg can stabilise C4F7,15 and in
the current study MgO, but also FeO, in most places
substituted for the CaO in the ferrite. The formation of
C4F7 has been detected by previous authors, also in the
binary system.16,17 In a study of formation mechanisms
for calcium ferrites, C4F7 and C3WF7 were predominant
phases in samples produced from quite a wide range of
CaOFe2O3 blends at treatment above 795uC.17
In the current study, accumulations of the ferrite
were sectioned into a darker part rich in magnesium and
a lighter part with calcium dominating, which implies
that there might be an immiscibility gap between the
magnesium and calcium rich ferrite. The presence of
9 Image (SEM) from peripheral areas of calcite pellet oxidised at 1280uC and reduced for 2 h at 900uC: FeO,
wustite; P, pore
478
2014
VOL
41
NO
Semberg et al.
Conclusions
The main binding phase in pellet with large addition of
calcite is of C4F7 type, with Fe and Mg substituting for
some of the calcium in the phase.
The ferrite cracks to a large extent during reduction
from hematite to magnetite at 500700uC. The calcium
does not diffuse into the magnetite below 900uC, but
when wustite begins to form at 800uC the calcium from
the ferrite diffuses into the wustite lattice, so that a very
porous calciowustite is formed.
The main decomposition of C4F7 occurs above
600uC, but the cracking in the ferrite phase and fissuring
of the pellets is severe throughout the 500700uC range.
This phase transformation is therefore believed not to
be the main reason for the breakdown. Instead, it is
believed that C4F7, just like CF2, is a very poor binding phase because of low cold strength. The calcium
addition to magnetite pellets should therefore not be
more than what is required to saturate the SiO2 in the
sample to form dicalciumsilicates. Any excess CaO
forms calcium ferrites, which contributes to a high
Acknowledgements
The work presented in this paper has been done in
remembrance of our former friend and colleague Anders
Rutqvist who through XRD first identified the calcium
ferrite in superfluxed magnetite pellets as C4F7.
Financing from HLRC (Hjalmar Lundbohm Research
Centre) and CAMM (Centre for Advanced Mining and
Metallurgy) is gratefully acknowledged. We would also
like to thank LKAB for providing material, as well as
valuable assistance and discussions about tests and
results.
References
1. S. M. Nutter: ISS Trans., 1991, 12, 7183.
2. V. Niiniskorpi: Development of phases and structures during
bo
pelletizing of Kiruna magnetite ore, PhD thesis, Report 04-3, A
bo, Finland, 2004.
Akademi, A
3. L. Bentell, L. Norrman and M. Sundgren: Scand. J. Metall., 1984,
13, 308315.
4. K. Lingtan, L. Yang and W-K. Lu: Scand. J. Metall., 1983, 4, 166
176.
5. S. Du, N. S. Srinivasan and L. I. Staffansson: Scand. J. Metall.,
1988, 17, 232238.
6. T. Borinder and X. Bi: Scand. J. Metall., 1989, 18, 280287.
7. F. B. Traice: Proc. Int. Symp. on Blast furnace ironmaking,
Jamshedpur, India, 1985, Indian Inst of Metals, Calcutta, 5168.
8. M. Hansen and K. Anderko: in Constitution of binary alloys, 2nd
edn, 354; 1958, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co.
9. K. Inoue, T. Ikeda and T Ueneka: Tetsu-to-Hagane, 1982, 68,
24412440.
10. A. A. El-Geassy: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1999, 26, 4152.
11. T. El Kasagby and W-K. Lu: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1980, 11B,
409414.
12. S. Geva, M. Farren, D. H. St. John, P. C. Hayes: Metall. Mater.
Trans. B, 1990, 21B, 743751.
13. F. Nakiboglu, D. H. St. John and P. C. Hayes: Metall. Mater.
Trans. B, 1986, 17B, 375381.
14. P. Semberg, A. Rutqvist, C. Andersson and B. Bjorkman: ISIJ Int.,
2011, 51, 173180.
15. P. B. Braun and W. Kwestro: Phillips Res. Repts, 1960, 15, 394.
16. H. Hughes, P. Roos and D. C. Goldring: Mineralogical Magazine,
1967, 36, 280291.
17. H. I. Saleh: J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2004, 20, 530534.
18. B. Phillips and A. Muan: Trans Metallur. Soc. AIME, 1960, 218,
11121118.
19. D. Springorum (ed.): Slag atlas, 58; 1995, Dusseldorf, Verlag
Stahleisen GmbH.
20. S. Sato, T. Kikuchi and Y. Chikao: Bull. Faculty Eng., 1970, 61,
3943.
21. A. V. Bradshaw and A. G Matyas: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1976,
7B, 8187.
22. P. R. Swann and N. J. Tighe: Metall. Trans. B, 1977, 8B, 479487.
23. P. C. Hayes and P. Grieveson: Metall. Trans. B, 1981, 12B, 579
587.
nal and A. V. Bradshaw: Metall. Trans. B, 1983, 14B, 743
24. A. U
752.
25. J. R. Porter and P. R. Swann: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1977, 4, 300
307.
26. S. P. E Forsmo, S.-E. Forsmo, P.-O. Samskog and B. M. T.
Bjorkman: Powder Technol., 2008, 183, 247259.
27. S. Lian and L. Xu: Sintering and Pelletizing, 2006, 31, 710.
28. G. Thaning: Ironmak. Steelmak., 1976, 3, 5763.
29. L. Granse: Proc. ICSTIS (suppl. Trans. ISI Jpn), 1971, 11, 45.
30. P Semberg, C. Andersson and B. Bjorkman: ISIJ Int., 2013, 53,
391398.
2014
VOL
41
NO
479