Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Minnesota Legislature created the Council on Black Minnesotans in 1980 to ensure that people of African heritage
fully and effectively participate in and equitably benefit from the political, social and economic resources, policies and
procedures of the State of Minnesota.
Find Out How to Get Involved Now!
cobm@state.mn.us
Minnesotans of African Heritage can do better and want to do better to contribute to the great state of
Minnesota. However, public officials and others need to allow debate on our solution to eradicate barriers
that slow our socioeconomic growth.
The Minnesota Legislature created the Council on Black Minnesotans in 1980 to ensure that people of
African heritage fully and effectively participate in and equitably benefit from the political, social and
economic resources, policies and procedures of the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes 3.9225
Subdivision 3 duties, in part, states the council shall:
(a) Advise the governor and the legislature on the nature of the issues confronting Black people in
this state;
(b) Advise the governor and the legislature on statutes or rules necessary to ensure that Black
people have access to benefits and services provided to people in this state;
(c) Recommend to the governor and the legislature any revisions in the state's affirmative action
program and other steps that are necessary to eliminate underutilization of Blacks in the state's
work force; and
(d) Recommend to the governor and the legislature legislation to improve the economic and social
condition of Black people in this state.
The Council prepares its recommendations and advisement by engaging in intensive qualitative and
quantitative information gathering within our community to learn what is needed from a public policy and
state administrative operational standpoint to help grow our assets and contribute more to the great state
of Minnesota. These engagements serve as the foundation for the development of community driven
proposals for legislation that we believe moves our state forward with new ideas, innovations and energy
that addresses the socioeconomic and sociopolitical challenges Minnesotans face. These proposals take
our community beyond constructs, simple tolerance, and the empty language of diversity and inclusion to
practicing ALLOPHILIA. ALLOPHILIA is having a positive attitude for one that is not your own.
The aim of the Councils proposed legislation is to make equal access to opportunities a practice, create
innovative policies and administrative approaches that eradicate all forms of disparities and ensure
human/civil rights enforcement. If these pillars are achieved the state of Minnesota will employ the
cultural agility it needs to be effective with its performance to benefits all its investors.
2
What is cultural agility and why its vital to State of Minnesotas performance effectiveness.
Cultural agility is the employment of individuals and entities with cultural and linguistic competence to
diversify an institutions professional base so congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies can come
together that enables effective work in cross-cultural situations, diverse culture communities and to reduce
institutional isms. 'Culture' refers to integrated patterns of human behavior that includes the language,
thoughts, communications, actions, customs, beliefs, values, and institutions of racial, ethnic, religious, or
social groups. 'Competence' implies having the capacity to function effectively as an individual and an
organization within the context of the cultural beliefs, behaviors, and needs presented by consumers and
their communities. (Adapted from Cross, 1989)
The Council on Black Minnesotans position is that cultural management is too often an attempt to pay
lip service to whats believed to be a cultural diversity, inclusion and competence issue. However,
weve found that public and private institutions enhance their effectiveness through an appreciation of the
contributions and utilization of what we call cultural agility.
This organizational agility recognizes and ensures those desiring culturally specific and competent
services have it available. This does not segregate us; it ensures we are diverse, inclusive, competent and
effective. Equally it makes equal opportunity a practice, employs policies and procedures that eradicate
disparities and ensures compliance with human/civil rights laws.
When a community and its institutions commit to cultural agility it builds a marketplace that practices
Allophilia. Allophilia is having a positive attitude for a group that is not ones own. In Minnesota the
human stories are singular but we know our destiny is shared we rise or fall as one state as one people,
and the power of human unity must prevail.
What is the status of the State of Minnesotas Cultural Agility operations?
The Acts that facilitate cultural agility in state government operations and the market place are the Human
Rights Act (MN 363,363A), the Procurement Act (MN 16C) and the Affirmative Action Act (MN 43A).
The underlining principle for the passage of these acts is all able residences contribute to Minnesotas
operational cost and if they are willing, able and available should be afforded equal access and
opportunity to fully and effectively participate in and equitably benefit from the political, social and
economic resources, policies and procedures of the State of Minnesota.
The following was found in the councils analysis of reports that provides insight into the status of
cultural agility in the State of Minnesotas operations:
A Mason Tillman Disparity Study in 1998 found due to discrimination, harassment, intimidation and
hostility on public and private contracting jobs, as well as exclusion from the "good old boys" network
has prevented African Americans, Caucasian females, Native, Asian, and Latino vendors from
obtaining a legal fair share of contracts issued by state government which resulted in the loss of
millions of dollars in contracting opportunities.
A MGT America in 2009 produced a complete and comprehensive availability and disparity studies
for five agencies (DOA, DOT, MMCD, MAC, and MFSC) making up Governmental Units under the
Department of Administration. Disparity was identified within each Governmental Unit at varying
levels and within different business classifications. MGT longitudinal analysis in the report showed
from 2002 -2009 African American and other ethnic vendors continued to experience discrimination,
harassment, intimidation and hostility on public and private contracting jobs, as well as exclusion
from the "good old boys" network which resulted in the loss of millions of dollars in legal contracting
opportunities.
3
After each of the aforementioned studies all Governmental Units were provided with
recommendations on how to address the two disparity analysis identified contracting discrimination
and was also provided statutory approaches in M.S. 16C to prevent and remedy contracting
discrimination in 1998 by the state legislature but the disparities and discrimination continues.
The State of Minnesota is the states largest employer with 40,208 people but each of its departments
has affirmative action plans that do not comply with provisions in M.S. 43A. With this fact the state
has not issued any effort like the Olmsted plan for other protected class groups that are underutilized
in state employment. (all departments AA plans 2012-2014, Business Journal 2013)
According to the Department of Employment and Economic Development web site about 47,100 job
vacancies, or 55.6 percent, were located in the Twin Cities seven-county area. The remaining 37,600
were in Greater Minnesota. Overall, there were 1.6 unemployed job seekers for each job vacancy
statewide indicating that the labor market is tightening due to baby boomer retirements and continued
job growth. Neither the state nor the private sector have developed and implemented a targeted plan to
address the high unemployment rate in the African heritage community.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory committee in each of the 50 states
and the District of Columbia. The committees are composed of state citizens who serve without
compensation. The committees advise the Commission of civil rights issues in their states that are
within the Commissions jurisdiction. Below is a summary from the Minnesota commission hearings
in 2011:
o The lack of resources for civil rights enforcement in the state has worsened, leaving Minnesota in
a crisis mode.
o Audits and disparity studies are showing huge underutilization of Minority Groups which indicate
noncompliance with the administrative application of civil rights and equal opportunity laws.
o Many legal advocates and victims of discrimination are refusing to refer complaints to the local
and state civil rights enforcement departments because they are in a continuous state of transition,
have a backlog of complaints, and have unclear enforcement policies.
In 2009, an Economic Policy Institute Disparity Study was published that reported the Twin Cities
metropolitan area suffered from the greatest employment disparity between whites and non-whites of
any United States City. The 2012, Wall Street Journal reports reaffirm the disparity continues for
Minnesotans of African Heritage.
In the 24/7 Wall Street Journal Report; The 10 worst states for black Americans, it indicates a
typical black household in Minnesota earned less than half the median income of white households in
2013, well below the 62.3% nationwide. Low incomes among the black population are likely due in
part to a high unemployment rate. While 15% of black workers in the state were unemployed in 2013,
fewer than 5% of the total workforce did not have a job, a gap nearly twice as large as the national
gap. High unemployment rates tend to lead to higher rates of people without health insurance, as a
majority of Americans receive health insurance through their employers. While only 6.9% of white
residents did not have health insurance in 2013, nearly 33% of blacks were uninsured. Additionally,
black Minnesotan households were three times less likely than white households to own their homes,
a rate nearly twice as high as the rest of the nation. Across the country, black Americans were also
more likely to be disenfranchised as a result of the criminal justice system. In 2013, more than 7% of
Minnesotas black population was barred from voting as a result of felony convictions or
imprisonment.
In conclusion, the Minnesota Legislature in 1998 enacted the present day version of Minnesota Chapter
16C (the Procurement Act) which, as since amended, provides in part: The Commissioner of
administration shall periodically designate businesses that are majority owned and operated by . . .
4
specific minorities as targeted group businesses within purchasing categories as determined by the
commissioner. Despite the clear language of the Procurement Act, MNDOA has not performed the
requisite designation of targeted group businesses.
In 1981, the Minnesota Legislature enacted Minnesota Chapter 43A (the Affirmative Action Act)
which, as amended, provides in part:
The commissioner shall establish statewide affirmative action goals for each of the Federal Equal
Employment Opportunity (EEO) occupational categories applicable to state employment, using at least
the following factors:
The percentage of members of each protected class in the recruiting area population who have the
necessary skills; and
The availability for promotion or transfer of current employees who are members of protected classes.
The Affirmative Action Act further provides that the Commissioner of MNDOA shall annually audit the
record of each agency to determine the rate of compliance with affirmative action requirements and
submit a bi-annual report to the governor and various offices of the Minnesota Legislature. Despite the
clear language of the Affirmative Action Act, the Commissioner of MNDOA has not performed the
required audits or has it performed its mandatory, affirmative duties under the Procurement Act. Despite
the clear language of the Affirmative Action Act, the Commissioner of MNDOT has not implemented a
sufficient affirmative action program.
In 2012, each state department published Affirmative Action Plans that do not meet the intent of
Minnesota Chapter 43A.
In 2013, the most recent year for which such data has been obtained by community members, MNDOT
contracted for only $891.00 with African American contractors. This represented less than .00023% of
the approximately $400 million in contracts entered into by MNDOT during 2013.
The Minnesota Legislature established the Human Rights Act in 1955 to ensure all citizens freedom from
discrimination. The Department of Human Rights has not had a net increase in funding in over twenty
years.
Minnesota Statutes Section 586.01 provides in part that a . . . writ of mandamus may be issued to any
inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person to compel the performance of an act which the law
specially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station. Under the compelling circumstances
presented here, it is appropriate for the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to the Commissioners of
MNDOA and MNDOT.
Further, The Commissioners of MNDOA, MDHR and MNDOT have caused individual and corporate
citizens we represent in Minnesotas African Heritage community to be injured as a direct and proximate
result of their failure to comply with the mandatory, affirmative requirements of the State of Minnesotas
Human Rights Act, Procurement Act and the Affirmative Action Act. The strict administrative application
of these acts must be achieved to ensure ALL Minnesotans continue to contribute to its greatest.
The aforementioned and proposed legislation on the next pages represent our advice and
recommendations for 2014 -2015 to ensure Minnesotans of African heritage fully and effectively
participate in and equitably benefit from the political, social and economic resources, policies and
procedures of the State of Minnesota.
References: Kotter, J & Cohen, D 2002, the heart of change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Mink, O, Esterhuysen, P, Mink, B & Owen, K 1993, Change at
work, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco. MGT America 2009 and Mason Tillman 1998 State of Minnesota disparity studies, The Worst States for Black Americans 24/7 Wall St. http://247wallst.com/special-report/2014/12/09/the-worst-states-for-black-americans/#ixzz3LuVXIQSz . 2014 Black Capital Report Dr. Bruce
Corrie.
COBM Expansion
There have been no amendments to the council duties since its inception. The council state
appropriations have not had a net increase since its inception. When the council was formed in 1980
there were 52, 000 African heritage residents. Today there are nearly 320,000 of which 76.000 are
recent African immigrants.
We believe diversifying the composition of the council board, changing its name; expanding its
duties, clearly defining it relationship with the office of the governor and legislature, increasing its
funding and establishing outstate offices will improve its ability to positively impact growing
socioeconomic and sociopolitical challenges/disparities impacting Black Minnesotans.
Please note when reading the bills below, Underlined text means additions and Strike through text means deleted
2.7 and those parts of Mali and Niger south of the Sahara.; and
2.8 (4) "Caribbean" means Afro-Jamaican, Trinidadian, Bahamian, Barbadian, Cuban,
2.9 Costa Rican, Haitian, Puerto Rican, Grenadian, and Vincentian.
3.23 Subd. 5. Powers. (a) The council may contract in its own name, but no money shall
3.24 be accepted or received as a loan nor indebtedness incurred except as otherwise provided
3.25 by law. Contracts shall be approved by a majority of the members of the council and
3.26 executed by the chair and the executive director. The council may apply for, receive, and
3.27 expend in its own name grants and gifts of money consistent with the power and duties
3.28 specified in subdivisions 1 to 7.
3.29 (b) The council may solicit and accept payments for advertising, use of exhibition
3.30 space, or commemorative videos or other items in connection with publications, events,
3.31 media productions, and informational programs that are sponsored by the council. These
3.32 revenues must be deposited in an account in the special revenue fund and are appropriated
3.33 to the council to defray costs of publications, events, media productions, or informational
3.34 programs consistent with the powers and duties specified in subdivisions 1 to 7. The
3.35 council may not publish advertising or provide exhibition space for any elected official
3.36 or candidate for elective office. The council must report by January 15 each year to the
4.1 chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate funding
4.2 divisions with jurisdiction over the council on the amount and source of each payment
4.3 received under this paragraph in the prior fiscal year.
4.4 (c) The council shall appoint an executive director who is experienced in
4.5 administrative activities and familiar with the problems and needs of Black people
4.6 Minnesotans of African heritage. The council may delegate to the executive director
4.7 powers and duties under subdivisions 1 to 7 which do not require council approval.
4.8 The executive director serves in the unclassified service and may be removed at any
4.9 time by the council. The executive director shall recommend to the council, and the
4.10 council may appoint the appropriate staff necessary to carry out its duties. Staff members
4.11 serve in the unclassified service. The commissioner of administration shall provide the
4.12 council with necessary administrative services. The council shall partner with state
4.13 agencies and departments to develop African heritage business recruitment to the state
4.14 and increase international trade relations with African nations. The council shall make
4.15 recommendations on legacy appropriations for conservation, clean water, and arts and
4.16 cultural heritage projects in Minnesota communities of African heritage.
4.17 (d) The council shall partner with state agencies and departments to develop African
4.18 heritage business recruitment to the state and increase international trade relations with
4.19 African nations.
4.20 (e) The council may receive legacy funds to provide grants for conservation, clean
4.21 water, and arts and cultural heritage projects in the African heritage community.
4.22 Subd. 6. State agency assistance. Other state agencies shall supply the council
4.23 upon request with advisory staff services on matters relating to the jurisdiction of the
4.24 council. The council shall cooperate and coordinate its activities with other state agencies
4.25 to the highest possible degree.
4.26 Subd. 7. Report. The council shall prepare and submit a report to the governor and
4.27 legislature by November 15 of each year. The report shall summarize the activities of the
4.28 council since its last report, list receipts and expenditures, identify the major problems and
4.29 issues confronting Black people Minnesotans of African heritage, make recommendations
4.30 to address issues, and list the specific objectives which the council seeks to attain during
4.31 the next biennium. The council shall report on outcome measures.
4.32 Sec. 2. REVISOR'S INSTRUCTION.
4.33 The revisor shall change the term "Council on Black Minnesotans" to "Council
4.34 for Minnesotans of African Heritage" whenever the term appears in Minnesota Statutes
4.35 or Minnesota Rules.
9
Human Rights
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory committee in each of the 50 states and
the District of Columbia. The committees are composed of state citizens who serve without
compensation. The committees advise the Commission of civil rights issues in their states that are within
the Commissions jurisdiction. Below is a summary from the Minnesota commission hearings in 2011:
The lack of resources for civil rights enforcement in the state has worsened, leaving Minnesota in a
crisis mode.
Audits and disparity studies are showing huge underutilization of Minority Groups which indicate
noncompliance with the administrative application of civil rights and equal opportunity laws.
Many legal advocates and victims of discrimination are refusing to refer complaints to the local and
state civil rights enforcement departments because they are in a continuous state of transition, have a
backlog of complaints, and have unclear enforcement policies.
12/18/14 REVISOR SGS/JC 15-0900
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to human rights; providing compliance oversight for human rights claims;
1.3 appropriating money; amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 363A.06,
1.4 subdivision 1; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 6.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.6 Section 1. [6.92] STATEWIDE COMPLIANCE OVERSIGHT.
1.7 (a) In order to increase enforcement and oversight functions of the Department of
1.8 Human Rights, the state auditor shall establish a department within the Office of the
1.9 State Auditor to:
1.10 (1) ensure that all duties specified in section 363A.06 are dealt with as a priority;
1.11 (2) implement audit and review procedures for state agencies and contractors to
1.12 follow to comply with applicable provisions in chapters 16C and 43A and section 363A.06;
1.13 (3) conduct affirmative action and human rights impact analysis on all executive
1.14 orders to be issued and propose legislation needed;
1.15 (4) review and approve all state contract procurement services under chapter 16C for
1.16 compliance with chapter 363A;
1.17 (5) establish benchmarks for meeting equal opportunity requirements in contracting;
1.18 and
1.19 (6) establish good faith benchmarks for equal opportunity compliance in
1.20 subcontracting.
1.21 (b) The state auditor shall report to the legislative committees with jurisdiction over
1.22 human rights on the findings of the audit by January 15, 2016, and annually thereafter.
1.23 The report shall be issued to the governor and the public at large through the state auditor's
1.24 Web site.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 363A.06, subdivision 1, is amended to read:
2.2 Subdivision 1. Formulation of policies. (a) The commissioner shall formulate
2.3 policies to effectuate the purposes of this chapter and shall do the following:
2.4 (1) exercise leadership under the direction of the governor in the development of
2.5 human rights policies and programs, and make recommendations to the governor and the
2.6 legislature for their consideration and implementation;
2.7 (2) establish and maintain a principal office in St. Paul, and any other necessary
10
11
12
Jobs/Economic Development
Based on Minnesota Economic Policy Institute (EPI) 2012, Mason Tillman 1998, MGT America, 2006,
All Departments Affirmative Action Plans, 2012-2014
In 2011, 37.2 percent of Blacks were living in poverty; a typical black household in Minnesota earned
less than half the median income of white households in 2013, well below the 62.3% nationwide. Low
incomes among the black population are likely due in part to a high unemployment rate. While 15% of
black workers in the state were unemployed in 2013, fewer than 5% of the total workforce did not
have a job, a gap nearly twice as large as the national gap. In 2011, the median household income for
Blacks stood near $27,000, less than half the statewide median of $55,459,and
State of Minnesotas contracting activities are discriminatory, noncompliant and have underutilized
Targeted Business Groups in all areas of contracting since 1998, and all state departments have severe
underutilization of African Heritage professionals and all required departments have produced
noncompliant affirmative action plans.
2.8 other means specified by written notice from the commissioner to the bidder. The bidder
2.9 for the prime contract must solicit bids from a minimum of five certified businesses listed
2.10 in clause (2) for each subcontract within the prime contract by SIC code where available
2.11 and applicable. If the applicable certified list, using the SIC code or codes where available
2.12 is five or fewer, the bidder must contact the entire list;
2.13 (7) has provided plans and specifications or information regarding the location of
2.14 each contract bid to the certified businesses listed in clause (2);
2.15 (8) when applicable, advise and make efforts to assist interested businesses in clause
2.16 (2) to obtain bonds, lines of credit, or insurance required to perform the contract; and
2.17 (9) if bids were rejected, submit documentation giving the complete basis to the
2.18 certified vendor for the rejection and evidence that the rejection was justified. Bidders
2.19 on prime contracts who continually list the same certified businesses listed in clause (2)
2.20 as having been contacted and listed as unavailable, when contact has previously been
2.21 unsuccessful due to disconnected telephone numbers or returned mail via postal service or
2.22 e-mail, will not be considered in compliance with the outreach efforts.
14
15
Education
Based on Department Of Education Reports, 2011-2012
Minnesota has long enjoyed a reputation for its high-quality public education, placing at or near the
top in many nation-wide rankings and measures. But these encouraging statistics mask growing
concerns of a widening achievement gap that is leaving many students unprepared for a successful
future. Currently:
Seventy-seven percent of the 3rd graders across the state read at grade level in 2011, but only 60
percent of those who transferred schools during the year did.
About 49 percent of 11th grade students in Minnesota achieved state standards in math in 2011, up
significantly from 30 percent in 2006. High school juniors in the Twin Cities are slightly more likely
to be proficient than those in Greater Minnesota.
Overall, only about three-quarters of our states students graduated on time from high school in 2011;
but only 55 percent of students of color. There has been little progress improving this rate during the
past 6 years.
The ratio of guidance counselors to student in Minnesotas Public Schools is roughly 1:700. The
national average is 1:450.
The growing cost of higher education at all levels is putting it out of reach for students of color.
12/31/14 REVISOR JFK/HR 15-0907
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to education; modifying certain community education provisions;
1.3 amending Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 124D.20, by adding a subdivision.
1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.5 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 124D.20, is amended by adding a
1.6 subdivision to read:
1.7 Subd. 13. Targeted communities. (a) A school district containing a targeted
1.8 community must assign at least 50 percent of revenue under subdivisions 3, 4, and 4a to
1.9 local educational nonprofits. A school district has a targeted community if the school
1.10 district (1) contains any area of a targeted community as designated by a city under section
1.11 469.202 or (2) the school board designates an area of the district using the criteria under
1.12 section 469.202, subdivisions 2 and 3.
1.13 (b) For purposes of this subdivision, a "local educational nonprofit" means a nonprofit
1.14 organization capable of providing services under subdivision 4a, 8, or 9 that is either:
1.15 (1) located within the targeted community either by the organization's or the owner's
1.16 address; or
1.17 (2) located outside the targeted community if:
1.18 (i) there is not a local educational nonprofit within the targeted community;
1.19 (ii) the nonprofit has experience working in the targeted community; and
1.20 (iii) the nonprofit will hire and train residents of the targeted community to provide
1.21 the services.
1.22 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective for fiscal year 2016 and later.
We support the following:
1. MNSCU Charting The Future
2. Student Services Personnel Team Staffing Grants - SF 799 (2015 session)
3. Department Education Early Childhood Education Initiative
16
Housing
Only 29.4 percent of Black Minnesotans owned the home they lived in, while the rest rented.
Black Minnesotan households were three times less likely than white households to own their homes,
a rate nearly twice as high as the rest of the nation.
African Americans renters paid a higher percentage of their income for housing - 61.3 percent had
paid more than 30 percent of their household income per the previous 12 months.
The household wealth of Blacks dropped more than that of Whites during the Great Recession,
according to a study released by the Pew Research Center. Pew Researchers say the decline of the
housing market is the main influence behind the increasing gap in wealth between White households
and their Black counterparts.
12/19/14 REVISOR SS/AA 15-0834
A bill for an act1.1 relating to housing finance; modifying capacity building grants; amending
1.2 Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 462A.21, subdivision 3b.
1.3 BEITENACTEDBYTHELEGISLATUREOFTHESTATEOFMINNESOTA:
1.4 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 462A.21, subdivision 3b, is amended to
1.5 read:
1.6 Subd. 3b. Capacity building grants. It (a)The agency may make capacity building
1.7 grants to for the purpose of expanding capacity and providing affordable housing and
1.8 housing-related services.
1.9 (b) The agency may award grants to:
1.10 (1) nonprofit organizations,;
1.11 (2) nonprofit organizations managed by African heritage individuals that provide
1.12 landlord and tenant counseling and mediation in Duluth, Rochester, St. Cloud, Mankato,
1.13 Minneapolis, and St. Paul community with a significant African heritage population
1.14 and high renter population;
1.15 (3) local government units,; and
1.16 (4) Indian tribes, and Indian tribal organizations to expand their capacity to provide
1.17 affordable housing and housing-related services.
1.18 (c) The grants may be used to assess housing needs and to develop and implement
1.19 strategies to meet those needs, including the creation or preservation of affordable
1.20 housing, pre purchase and post purchase counseling and associated administrative costs,
1.21 and the linking of supportive services to the housing. The agency shall adopt rules
1.22 specifying the eligible uses of grant money.
2.1 (d) Funding priority must be given to those applicants that include low-income
2.2personsintheirmembership, and have provided housing-related services to low-income
2.3 people, and
.2.4 (e) Grant recipients not meeting the priority requirements in paragraph (d)
2.5 must demonstrate a local commitment of local resources, which may include in-kind
2.6 contributions.
2.7 (f) Grants under this subdivision maybe made only with specific appropriations by
2.8 the legislature or revenues of the agency and grants received by the agency.
We support the following:
2.12 Subd. 2. Land use plan. (a) A land use plan shall include the water management
2.13 planrequiredbysection103B.235, and shall designate the existing and proposed location,
2.14 intensity and extent of use of land and water, including lakes, wetlands, rivers, streams, - 2.15 natural
drainage courses, and adjoining land areas that affect water natural resources, for
2.16 agricultural, residential, commercial, industrial and other public and private purposes, or
2.17 any combination of such purposes.
2.18 (b) A land use plan shall contain a protection element, as appropriate, for historic
2.19 sites, the matters listed in the water management plan required by section 103B.235, and
2.20 an element for protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy
2.21 systems.
2.22 (c)A land use plan shall also include a housing element containing standards, plans
2.23 andprogramsforprovidingadequatehousingopportunitiestomeetexistingandprojected
2.24 local and regional housing needs, including but not limited to the use of official controls
2.25 and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low
2.26 and moderate income housing.
2.27 (d) A land use plan shall also include the local government's goals, intentions, and
2.28 priorities concerning aggregate and other natural resources, transportation infrastructure,
2.29 land use compatibility, habitat, agricultural preservation and development, and other
2.30 planning priorities, considering information regarding supply from the Minnesota
2.31 Geological Survey Information Circular No. 46.
2.32 - Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 73.859,subdivision 5,is amended to read: Subd. 5.
Urbanization and redevelopment areas. The comprehensive plans may
3.1 designate, when appropriate, five-year urbanization areas and shall specify in the capital
3.2 improvementprogramthetimingandsequenceofmajorlocalpublicfacilitiesandinthe
3.3 implementationprogramofficialcontrolswhichwillensurethaturbanizationoccursonly
3.4 in urbanization areas and in accordance with the plan.
3.5 The comprehensive plans may designate, when appropriate, redevelopment areas
3.6 and may, as appropriate, specify in the capital improvement program the timing and
3.7 sequenceoflocalpublicfacilitiesandintheimplementationprogramthefiscaldevicesor
3.8 officialcontrolsthatwillensurethatredevelopmentoccursinaccordancewiththeplan.
3.9 The comprehensive plan for a city with a population greater than 60,000 residents
3.10 shall include urban agriculture development zones; include an approach for development
3.11 and maintenance of the zones; specify in the capital improvement program the timing and
3.12 sequence of the zones; and specify in the implementation program the fiscal devices
3.13 or official controls that will ensure that redevelopment occurs according to the plan.
3.14 Additionally, the comprehensive plan will define when and where urban agricultural
3.15 development initiatives fit as a highest and best use in areas outside of designated zones
20
2.28 individual sat educational institutions, or nonprofit organizations residing or located in the
2.29 state for research or demonstrations on farms in the state or organizations and individuals - 2.30 in
qualifying urban cities that address fresh food access including access to affordable
2.31 organic food stores reduce food deserts through the development of urban agriculture projects. 2.32
(b) Grants may only be made for projects that show:
2.33 (1) for projects that demonstrate:
2.34 (i)the ability to maximize director indirect energy savings or production (2) - (ii)appositive effect or
reduced adverse effect on the environment ;and
3.1 (3)(iii)increasedprofitabilityfortheindividualfarmbyreducingcostsorimproving
3.2 marketing opportunities; or
3.3 (2)for projects that address fresh food access including access to affordable organic
3.4 food stores reduce food deserts through the development of urban agriculture projects.
3.5 Subd. 3. Awarding of grants. (a) Applications for grants must be made to the
3.6 commissioner on forms prescribed by the commissioner.
3.7 (b) The applications must be reviewed, ranked, and recommended by a technical
3.8 review panel appointed by the commissioner. The technical review panel shall consist of a
3.9 soil scientist, anagronomist, are presentative from a post-secondary educational institution,
3.10 an agricultural marketing specialist, two resident farmers of the state using sustainable
3.11 agriculture methods, two resident farmers of the state using organic agriculture methods,
3.12 two residents of the state practicing urban agriculture, and a chair from the department.
3.13 (c) The technical review panel shall rank applications according to the following
3.14 criteria:
3.15 (1) direct or indirect energy savings or production;
3.16 (2) environmental benefit;
3.17 (3) farm profitability;
3.18 (4)the number of farms able to apply the techniques or the technology proposed;
3.19 (5) the effectiveness of the project as a demonstration;
3.20 (6) the immediate transferability of the project to farms; and
3.21 (7) the ability of the project to accomplish its goals.;
3.22 (8) the ability to address fresh food access including access to affordable organic
3.23 foodstoimprovebothlocalandregionalfoodsecuritythroughthedevelopmentofurban
3.24 agriculture projects; and
3.25 (9)the ability to address health disparities related to food access.
3.26 (d) The commissioner shall consider there commendations of the technical review
3.27 panel and may award grants for eligible projects. Priority must be given to applicants who
3.28 are farmers or groups of farmers.
3.29 (e) Grants for eligible projects may not exceed $25,000 unless the portion above
3.30 $25,000 is matched on an equal basis by the applicant's cash or in-kind land use
3.31 contribution. Grant funding of projects may not exceed $50,000 under this section, but
3.32 applicants may utilize other funding sources. A portion of each grant must be targeted for
3.33 public information activities of the project. - (f) A project may continue for up to three years.
Multiyear projects must be
4.1 reevaluated by the technical review panel and the commissioner before second or third
4.2 year funding is approved. A project is limited too new grant for its funding.
4.3 Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 2012, section17.1161, is amended to read:
4.4 17.1161 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF MINNESOTA
4.5 AGRICULTURE PROGRAM.
4.6 Subdivision1. Establishment; framework. The Minnesota Institute for Sustainable
4.7 Agriculture shall establish a framework for participatory problem-solving in local
4.8 communities throughout rural and urban Minnesota that will strengthen the connection
4.9 between local communities, identified food deserts, as defined by the United States
22
4.10 Department of Agriculture, and deficient affordable fresh and organic food access zones in 4.11
urban communities, regions, and the land-grant university; invest research, education, and
4.12 outreach dollars to meet agreed- upon local and regional needs; and foster the development
4.13 of integrated agricultural systems that are profitable, enhance environmental quality, and
4.14 support healthy rural and urban communities. The framework must include regional,
4.15 community- -controlled agricultural sustainable development centers located at University
4.16 of Minnesota regional experiment stations. At each center, the Minnesota Institute for
4.17 Sustainable Agriculture shall facilitate the development of a leadership team comprised
4.18 of farmers, researchers, public agencies, and other local community representatives to
4.19 identify problems, chart trends in problems over time, and develop an understanding of
4.20 the agricultural system as a whole, common goals for development of the system, and
4.21 five-year action plans to address those goals. The Minnesota Institute for Sustainable
4.22 Agriculture shall appoint a statewide oversight group of persons with a thorough
4.23 knowledge of agriculture-related issues, including farmers' organizations, commodity
4.24 groups, rural economic development groups, the Department of Agriculture and other
4.25 public agencies, academic personnel, Research Institute, the
4.26 Minnesota Extension Service, and representatives from each regional leadership team.
4.27 The over sight group shall review and comment on the regional centers' action plans and
4.28 integrate them into a comprehensive agenda for long-term basic and applied research,
4.29 education, and outreach activities. The oversight group shall use this agenda to make
4.30 recommendations on the allocation of funds for regional or statewide use. The Minnesota
4.31InstituteforSustainableAgricultureboardofdirectorsshallreviewandgivefinalapproval
4.32 oftheallocationoffundsafterconsultationwiththedeanoftheCollegeofAgricultural,
4.33 Food, and Environmental Sciences at the University of Minnesota. - Subd. 2. Program areas. Longterm research and education activities must be
5.1 focused in four five program areas:
5.2 (1) sustainable cropping systems;
5.3 (2) development of markets and agriculture-related businesses;
5.4 (3) sustainable livestock systems; and
5.5 (4) improving access to high-quality fresh fruits and vegetables and increasing local
5.6 food security in very low to moderate income communities; and
5.7 (5) intergenerational transfer in agriculture.
23