Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Focus
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 6 December 2011
Received in revised form
27 December 2012
Accepted 28 December 2012
A multi-technique characterization and a provenance study of the black pigment used in Cucuteni
pottery painting (Neolithic age, Romania) were carried out. 127 Cucuteni shards were analyzed by Raman
spectrometry. The main components of this pigment are pyrolusite and/or jacobsite. Hematite and quartz
are frequent minor components and Ti oxides were seldom found. The manganiferous corpuscles discovered at Neamt county (eastern part of Romania) were the raw material of the Cucuteni black pigment.
The Mn corpuscles were studied using XRD, Raman, FT-IR and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. The
main components are birnessite, goethite and frequently, quartz. Raw material was subjected to a temperature of 750 C for 6 h and,once cooled, analyzed through Raman and FT-IR spectrometry. Pyrolusite,
hematite and quartz were found in the heated powder sample.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Cucuteni culture
Black pigment source
Birnessite
Goethite
Pyrolusite
Jacobsite
1. Introduction
Around 6500 years ago, Neolithic people living in Eastern
Europe crafted beautiful monochrome and/or trichrome painted
pottery. This last great calcholithic civilization of Europe known as
the CucutenieAriusdeTripolye cultural complex spread across
350,000 km2, from the south-east of Transylvania (Romania,
CucutenieAriusd culture) to the Dnieper River (Ukraine, Tripolye
culture). Based on the painted decoration of the pottery, the
Cucuteni culture was divided into three phases: Cucuteni A (4525/
4500e4050 B.C.), AeB (4100e3800/3700 B.C.) and B (3800/3700e
3500/3350 B.C.) (Mantu, 2000; Buzgar et al., in press).
The ornamentation of the Cucuteni phase A pottery is characterized by polychrome painting, with varied spiral and meander
motifs in red or white and black borderlines covering the entire
surface of the pot, in a so-called horror vacui style (Mantu, 2000).
In the next evolutionary phase, AeB, the three colors gain equal
importance. During the nal phase of the Cucuteni culture, the
decoration of the pots becomes more sophisticated. The meander
almost disappears, while the spiraled decorative motifs are oversimplied. Zoomorphic and anthropomorphic representations
become more frequent and the three colors e red, black and
Fig. 1. Manganiferous corpuscles collected from the Calu riverbed (right tributary of
the Bistrita river).
The second hypothesis was put forth in Buzgar et al. (2010b) and
based on the Raman, XRD and mineralogical studies on the
spherical or oblate black corpuscles discovered in a Cucuteni pot at
Fetesti e La Schit (Suceava county). It pointed out that the black
pigment consists of Mn Fe oxihydroxides and quartz. Neither Mn
carbonates nor Mn silicates were identied. Thus it concluded that
the raw materials used for black pigment were of sedimentary
genesis and could not have originated from Iacobeni. At the time
the paper was published, the only known larger sedimentary Mn
accumulation was that of Nikopol (Ukraine) and as such it was
considered a possible source for raw material.
This paper indicates for the rst time the presence of accumulations of manganiferous corpuscles in Quaternary detrital
deposits, situated in the Neamt county (north eastern part of
Romania). These manganiferous corpuscles (Fig. 1) were initially
discovered in the riverbed of a right side tributary of the Bistrita
river (Fig. 2).
2129
, 1968).
Fig. 2. Plot on the geological map (Neamt county e NE of Romania) of the manganiferous corpuscles observation points (modied after Murgeanu and Mirauta
2130
Eastern Carpathians and the Prut river (Fig. 6). To determine the
composition of the black pigment, we have only used Raman
spectrometry for two reasons. First, Raman analysis was sufciently
relevant and second, we avoided damaging the artifacts studied.
Manganiferous corpuscles were collected from the Calu riverbed
(right tributary of the Bistrita river). They were analyzed through
Raman spectrometry, and then ground to 2e3 mm and analyzed by
XRD, FT-IR, Raman and AAS.
Raman spectra were acquired using a Horiba Jobin-Yvon RPA-HE
532 Raman Spectrometer with a multichannel air cooled (70 C)
CCD detector, using a frequency doubled NdYag laser at 532 nm and
a nominal power of 100 mW. The spectral resolution was 3 cm1
and the spectral range between 200 and 3400 cm1. The Raman
system includes a Superhead ber optic Raman probe for
2131
Fig. 5. Different phases of metasomatism (1 e crust; 2 e clast is almost substituted by Mn minerals; 3 e clast is completely substituted by Mn minerals).
There are two different Raman spectra recorded from Mn corpuscles, as shown in Fig. 8(A). The main component is birnessite,
with characteristic Raman lines at 485, 506, 555, 575, 646e641 and
696 cm1, in good agreement with Julien et al. (2003). The second
mineral present in the raw material is goethite, with the main
Raman band at 566 cm1. The Raman line which occurs at 646 cm1
in sample 2, is an overlap of Raman lines for birnessite and goethite.
Quartz was identied in one of the analyzed points of sample 2,
which indicates that the premetasomatic clast was a sandstone
clast. Quartz is a very stable mineral under hypergene conditions,
preserving itself in Mn corpuscles more than other minerals (e.g.
feldspar, mica, calcite, clay minerals) from premetasomatic clasts.
The K, Na and Ca cations from these minerals were either leached or
caught in the lattice of birnessite. In our samples, the main Raman
line of birnessite appears shifted between 641 and 646 cm1, which
indicates the presence of large cations in its structure, such as Na
and K, in agreement with Julien et al. (2003). These cations are
primarily derived from feldspar, a common mineral component of
sandstone clasts.
Chemical analysis of sample performed by AAS, showed that the
raw material consists mainly of Mn and Fe oxyhydroxides (Table 1)
and the Mn/Fe ratio is 7.31. This value is much higher than the value
for Mn ore from Iacobeni (which is less than 1) or from Nikopol
(approximately 1), both of which were outlined by Constantinescu
et al. (2007). Likewise, the high content of SiO2 and low content of
Al2O3 indicate the presence of quartz in the sample.
XRD study on the same powder revealed the presence of birnessite, goethite and quartz (Fig. 7). The interlayer distances di were
attributed to the aforementioned minerals in agreement with
Julien et al. (2003), Gualtieri and Venturelli (1999), Levien et al.
(1980), Lopano et al. (2009) and JCPDS standards.
Raman analysis of the sample after heating to 750 C reveals the
presence of anhydrous minerals, as expected. Pyrolusite and
hematite occur instead of birnessite and goethite (Fig. 8, B). The
presence of pyrolusite is marked by the Raman lines at 288, 358sh,
478, 527, 644vs and 869sh cm1 (sh e shoulder; vs e very strong),
in good agreement with Buzgar et al. (2009).
According to several authors (e.g. Downs, 2006; Buzgar et al.,
2009), hematite shows Raman lines around 222, 242, 292vs, 408,
499, 611, 658, 814 and 1063 cm1. Other than the 408 cm1 Raman
line, all the other Raman lines assigned to hematite are overlapped
with Raman lines of pyrolusite. The same situation occurs in the
case of quartz.
The IR spectra of raw material before and after heating to 750 C
are shown in Fig. 9 in the spectral region 370e2000 cm1. Analogous to the Raman discussion, the heat treatment of raw material
leads to a transformation of Mn and Fe minerals. The infrared
analysis corroborates with ndings of XRD and Raman analysis and
Fig. 6. The archaeological site map; the black square is the area were the manganiferous corpuscles are found.
2132
Fig. 7. X-ray powder diffraction diagram of raw material; Bir e birnessite, Gth e goethite, Q e quartz.
Fig. 8. Raman spectra of raw material; A e manganiferous corpuscles; B e powder sample, after heating in atmospheric conditions for 6 h, to 750 C; Q, Py and Hem are standards
for quartz, pyrolusite and hematite, after Buzgar et al. (2009).
Fe32O3 hematite
Table 1
Chemical composition (AAS) of raw material (wt%).
Sample
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3a
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
22.36
1.95
7.48
54.67
0.32
0.83
1.17
0.87
2133
(2)
M2M32O4:
Fe2O3 as Fe total.
(3)
(4)
(5)
beMn4O2 pyrolusite
(1)
Mg - jacobsite
jacobsite
600
Fe jacobsite
(Mn2+,Mg2+,Fe2+)(Fe3+,Mn3+)2O4
620
Fig. 9. FT-IR spectra of raw material, at 25 C and after heating in atmospheric conditions for 6 h at 750 C.
magnetite
Fe2+Fe3+2O4
626
2134
Fig. 10. Typical Raman spectra of the Cucuteni black pigment. Samples names represent the name of places where archeological sites are situated (see Fig. 6).
4. Conclusions
References
Buciuman, F., Patcas, F., Craciun, R., Zahn, D.R.T., 1999. Vibrational spectroscopy of
bulk and supported manganese oxides. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 1,
185e190.
Burghelea, V., Melinescu, A.M., Dumitrascu, G., Vlaicu, I., Popescu, M.I., 2003.
Chromatic characterisation of Cucuteni ceramics e Scnteia A2. Revista Romna
de Materiale 33, 251e258.
Buzgar, N., Apopei, A.I., Buzatu, A., 2009. Romanian Database of Raman Spectra.
http://rdrs.uaic.ro.
Buzgar, N., Bodi, G., Astefanei, D., Buzatu, A.I., 2010a. The Raman study of white, red
and black pigments used in Cucuteni neolithic painted ceramics. Analele
Stiintice Ale Universitatii Al. I. Cuza Din Iasi e Geologie 56, 5e14.
Buzgar, N., Bodi, G., Buzatu, A.I., Apopei, A.I., Astefanei, D., 2010b. Raman and XRD
studies of black pigment from Cucuteni ceramics. Analele Stiintice Ale
Universitatii Al. I. Cuza Din Iasi e Geologie 56.
Buzgar, N., Bodi, G., Buzatu, A.I., Apopei, A.I. The Raman Study of the White Pigment
Used in Cucuteni Pottery. Eastern and Central European Studies Series, vol. IV.
Peter Lang Publishing Group, in press.
Constantinescu, B., Bugoi, R., Pantos, E., Popovici, D., 2007. Phase and chemical
composition analysis of pigments used in Cucuteni Neolithic painted ceramics.
Documenta Prehistorica 34, 281e288.
Downs, R.T., 2006. The RRUFF Project: an Integrated Study of the Chemistry, Crystallography, Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy of Minerals. Program and
2135
Mantu, C.-M., 2000. CucutenieTripolye cultural complex: relations and synchronisms with other contemporaneous cultures from the Black Sea area. Studia
Antiqua et Archaeologica. Iasi (Romania) 7, 267.
Mendelovici, E., Yariv, S., Villalba, R., 1979. Aluminum-bearing goethite in Venezuelan Laterites. Clay and Clay Minerals 27, 368e372.
uta
, D., 1968. R. S. Romania. Geological Map, 1:200.000 Scale.
Murgeanu, G., Mira
Piatra-Neamt Sheet. Geological Institute Bucharest.
Niculescu, G., Coltos, C., Popovici, D., 1982. Analysis of pigments used for
decorations of Cucuteni pottery. Cercet
ari de Restaurare si Conservare 2,
205e206.
Potter, R.M., Rossman, G.R., 1979. The tetravalent manganese oxides: identication,
hydration, and structural relationships by infrared spectroscopy. American
Mineralogist 64, 1199e1218.
Renuka, R., Ramamurthy, S., 2000. An investigation on layered birnessite type
manganese oxides for battery applications. Journal of Power Sources 87,
144e152.
Stos-Gale, Z., Rook, E., 1981. Analysis of pigments used for decorations of
Neolithic pottery from Bilcze Zlote. Ukraine. In: Hughes, M.J. (Ed.), Scientic
Studies in Ancient Ceramics. British Museum, pp. 155e161. Occasional
Paper 19.
Tinsley, D.M., Sharp, J.H., 1971. Thermal analysis of manganese dioxide in controlled
atmospheres. Journal of Thermal Analysis 3, 43e48.