Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SN 2
SN1/E1
E2
mechanism
big
obstacle
stereochemistry
regiochemistry
rate
expression
Nu quality
LG quality
preferred
solvent?
substrate
SN2 and E2
one stepthis single step is the rate-determining step (RDS)
SN2: steric hindrance blocking Nu (Nu is in RDS)
E2: blocking B isnt a big obstacle (B doesnt join substrate)
SN2: inversion (backside attack, since LG blocks frontside)
E2: cis vs. trans determined by anti-periplanar transition-state
E2: possible products from deprotonation of any -carbon
major product w/ bulky base: less substituted (steric hindrance)
major product with non-bulky base: more substituted
Rate = k [substrate] [Nu- or B-], so [Nu-/B-] rate
(substrate and Nu-/B- are in RDS)
requires good Nu/strong B (Nu/B is in RDS)
bulky Nu/B favors E2 vs. SN2 (blocking B isnt a big obstacle)
requires good leaving group (because leaving group is in RDS)
polar aprotic (no O-H or N-H bonds)
(for SN2, hydrogen-bonds to solvent would block Nu)
(for E2, protic solvent would protonate the base)
SN2: methyl>1>2; 3 gives no SN2 (substitutents block Nu)
E2: 1, 2, or 3 (blocking B is not a big obstacle)
SN1/E1
two stepsRDS is formation of carbocation
stabilizing carbocation
(Nu/B isnt in RDS, so blocking it isnt an obstacle)
SN1: racemization (planar carbocation intermediate)
E1: both cis and trans isomers will be produced
E1: possible products from deprotonation of any -C
major product: more substituted alkene
(e--donating alkyl substituents stabilize alkenes)
Rate = k [substrate], so [Nu-/B-] rate unchanged
(only the substrate is in RDS)
can work with a poor Nu/weak B
(Nu/B isnt in RDS)
requires good leaving group (because LG is in RDS)
polar protic (at least one O-H or N-H bond)
(hydrogen-bonds to solvent stabilize carbocation)
3 > 2; methyl and 1 give no SN1/E1
(alkyl substituents stabilize the carbocation)
www.freelance-teacher.com
nucleophilicity
basicity
leaving-group ability
big difference
nucleophilicity
basicity
leaving-group ability
N O F
P S Cl
Se Br
I
N O F
P S Cl
Br
I
2
same row
electronegativity
less electronegative better Nu
(willing to donate electrons)
less electronegative stronger base
(willing to donate electrons)
more electronegative better LG
(willing to accept electrons)
same column
size
bigger better Nu (usually)
(big Nus are less hindered by solvent, more polarizable)
bigger weaker base
(large base can spread out and stabilize electron density)
bigger better leaving group
(big LGs can spread out and stabilize electron density)
SN 2
SN 1
E2
E1
big obstacle
steric hindrance
stabilizing the
carbocation
none
stabilizing the
carbocation
how to determine SN2 vs. E2 vs. SN1 vs. E1 for haloalkane and alkylsulfonate substrates
poor Nu / weak base
good Nu / weak base
good Nu / strong base
- O with no formal charge
Cl , Br , I , NC , N3 , S , Se , or
N- (including LDA), OCH3COO
or N, S, or Se with no formal charge
methyl -carbon no reaction
SN 2 1
E2 with t-butyl-oxide or LDA (bulky bases) 2
1 -carbon
Otherwise, SN2
2 -carbon 95% SN1
SN 2 1
E2
5% E1 (usually not shown)
3 -carbon 95% SN1
95% SN1
E2
5% E1 (usually not shown) 5% E1 (usually not shown)
For cases with 95% SN1, 5% E1, E1 products are generally not shown unless the problem specifies all possible products.
1
2
No reaction if beta-carbon is 4.
SN2 for methyl -carbon.
The table displays the major reaction(s) for each casein some cases there may be significant levels of other competing
reactions.
This table may not give the correct answer in all real-world situations, but it will generally be accurate for the questions that
are typical of exams.
www.freelance-teacher.com
how to determine SN2 vs. E2 vs. SN1 vs. E1 for alcohol substrates
First, the alcohol must be treated with an acid to give it a better leaving group.
nonnucleophilic acid + heat 1
nucleophilic acid
H2SO4 +
HCl, HBr, HI
First, acid protonates an alcohol to form a good leaving First, acid protonates alcohol to form a good leaving
group.
group.
Then, HSO4 or a nonprotonated alcohol acts a base.
Then, Cl-, Br- or I- act as nucleophiles or bases.
methyl -carbon
seldom tested 2
SN 2 3
1 -carbon
2 -carbon
E1
95% SN1, 5% E1
3 -carbon
E1
95% SN1, 5% E1
For cases with 95% SN1, 5% E1, E1 products are generally not shown unless the problem specifies all possible products.
1
When H2SO4 is used without heat, there is no reaction for methyl and 1 substrates; for 2 and 3 substrates, the mechanism is SN1,
with a nonprotonated alcohol as the nucleophile.
2
H2SO4 plus heat with a methyl or 1 alcohol will give SN2, with a nonprotonated alcohol as the nucleophile. And with very high heat
and a 1 alcohol, H2SO4 will give E2. But these cases are seldom tested.
3
No reaction with Cl-.
Ethers have similar reactivity to alcohols. HBr and HI attack ethers in SN2 or SN1 mechanisms to form alcohols; with a second
equivalent of acid, the alcohols can then be attacked by more HBr or HI to form haloalkanes.
The table displays the major reaction for each casein some cases there may be significant levels of minor competing
reactions.
The table may not give the correct answer in all situations, but it will generally be accurate for the questions that are typical of
exams.
www.freelance-teacher.com