Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2010.00784.x
..............................................................................................
1,2
1
1,3
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, the Chinese Academy of Science,
Wuhan, Hubei, China; 2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 3 Aquaculture Divisions,
E-Institute of Shanghai Universities, Shanghai, China
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................
FO0
FO25
Casein
390.0
390.0
Soybean meal
120.0
120.0
(oil-extracted)
Corn starch
200.0
200.0
a-starch
60.0
60.0
Vitamin premix1
4.0
4.0
Mineral premix2
50.0
50.0
Choline chloride
1.1
1.1
Cellulose
89.7
89.7
Chromic oxide
5.0
5.0
Attractant3
0.1
0.1
BHT4
0.1
0.1
FO5
20.0
Coconut oil6
80.0
60.0
Chemical composition (g kg)1)
Moisture
45.9
48.7
Crude protein
401.8
402.8
Crude lipid
65.4
76.1
Ash
55.4
56.2
FO50
FO75
FO100
390.0
120.0
390.0
120.0
390.0
120.0
200.0
60.0
4.0
50.0
1.1
89.7
5.0
0.1
0.1
40.0
40.0
200.0
60.0
4.0
50.0
1.1
89.7
5.0
0.1
0.1
60.0
20.0
200.0
60.0
4.0
50.0
1.1
89.7
5.0
0.1
0.1
80.0
61.6
421.4
70.2
55.5
54.4
401.2
74.8
56.4
71.2
402.1
75.6
56.3
At the end of the experiment, the sh of each tank were batchweighted after 24 h feed deprivation. Six sh per tank were
randomly selected, killed by a blow to the head, and blood
FO0
FO25
FO50
FO75
FO100
8:0
10:0
12:0
14:0
16:0
18:0
SFA1
16:1n-9
18:1n-9
20:1n-9
MUFA2
18:2n-6
20:4n-6
n-63
18:3n-3
20:5n-3
22:6n-3
n-34
PUFA5
n-3 HUFA6
n-3/n-6
4.6
4.1
36.4
17.8
14.5
6.0
84.3
0.3
10.5
0.0
10.8
4.6
0.0
4.6
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
5.0
0.0
0.1
3.8
3.4
27.5
14.4
15.1
5.9
71.0
1.2
11.9
0.3
13.6
9.0
0.2
9.2
1.1
2.5
2.7
6.3
15.5
5.2
0.7
1.6
1.7
16.3
11.4
16.8
6.3
54.8
2.4
14.0
0.6
17.2
14.1
0.4
14.5
2.0
5.6
5.9
13.5
28.0
11.5
0.9
0.8
0.9
7.9
8.0
17.5
6.1
41.9
3.2
15.5
0.8
19.9
18.5
0.6
19.2
2.8
8.0
8.3
19.0
38.2
16.2
1.0
0.3
0.4
1.3
5.2
17.3
6.0
31.1
4.2
16.2
1.1
21.9
21.8
0.8
22.8
3.4
10.4
10.5
24.2
47.0
20.8
1.1
samples were rapidly taken from the caudal vein using a syringe. After centrifugation (3000 g, 10 min, 4 C), serum was
separated for thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS)
values determination. Then viscera and muscle sample from
the region underneath the dorsal n were dissected and stored
at )20 C for fat deposition and TBARS analysis.
Liver and muscle samples were removed from eight other
sh of each tank and were immediately placed in liquid
nitrogen for fatty acid analysis. Similar samples were also
taken before 2-week lipid-free diet conditioned and at the
beginning of the experiment.
Triplicates of sh (10 sh each sample) at the beginning
and ve sh from each tank at the end of the experiment were
sacriced and stored at )20 C for sh body composition
analysis.
..............................................................................................
FO0
IBW1
FBW2
FR3
SGR4
FE5
PRE6
PER7
2.68
11.50
2.27
1.73
65.3
25.8
1.75
FO25
0.01
0.11a
0.02c
0.02a
1.74a
0.67a
0.02a
2.69
13.87
2.23
1.95
72.1
28.9
1.90
FO50
0.01
0.14c
0.01c
0.02c
0.87b
0.37b
0.01b
2.68
13.94
2.13
1.96
75.8
29.0
1.91
FO75
0.01
0.16c
0.00b
0.02c
0.55c
0.59b
0.00b
2.69
13.02
2.12
1.87
73.7
28.2
1.92
FO100
0.00
0.09b
0.01b
0.02b
0.95b
0.71b
0.02b
2.69
13.12
2.02
1.89
77.8
29.7
2.03
0.01
0.11b
0.01a
0.02b
0.60d
0.45b
0.01c
ADCd
ADCp2
ADCl3
FO0
FO25
FO50
FO75
FO100
81.8 0.46
95.3 0.13a
86.9 0.51a
82.8 0.21
96.2 0.10b
88.9 0.34b
81.6 0.63
96.6 0.19c
87.3 0.50a
83.1 0.17
96.1 0.07b
90.7 0.31c
82.7 0.60
96.4 0.07bc
91.1 0.44c
Table 5 Serum and muscle TBARS of gibel carp fed different diets
for 12 weeks (Mean SE)*
Diet
Serum TBARS
(nmol MDA mL)1)
FO0
FO25
FO50
FO75
FO100
10.20
15.82
17.79
19.47
18.37
0.53a
0.33b
1.70b
0.53b
0.82b
Muscle TBARS
(nmol MDA mg prot)1)
3.65
6.73
8.07
7.68
8.73
0.43a
0.86b
0.97b
0.65b
0.54b
Table 5 shows that serum and muscle TBARS were signicantly lower in sh fed the FO0 diet compared with all other
treatments (P < 0.05). The relationship between serum
TBARS or muscle TBARS and dietary n-3 HUFA can be
described as (Fig. 2):
TBARSserum = 0.39 DH + 12.19
TBARSmuscle = 0.21 DH + 4.68
where DH is dietary n-3 HUFA (% of total fatty acids).
..............................................................................................
Table 6 Body and tissue composition of gibel carp fed different diets for 12 weeks (g kg)1 in wet weight) (Mean SE)*
Diet
Body
Dry matter
Crude protein
Crude lipid
Ash
Muscle
Moisture
Crude lipid
Viscera
Moisture
Crude lipid
Initial fish
FO0
250.9
154.7
52.8
33.4
272.3
149.0
49.1
28.7
6.8
4.3
0.4
1.4
FO25
1.1a
1.6
2.4
0.3c
276.4
152.5
54.5
28.2
FO50
1.4ab
2.0
2.0
0.2bc
285.3
152.2
64.6
27.5
FO75
1.4c
2.4
3.4
0.3ab
273.5
148.6
50.6
27.7
FO100
1.8ab
2.8
4.1
0.0ab
279.0
148.2
57.4
27.2
2.9b
1.4
4.9
0.2a
768.0 1.3
14.4 1.0
767.0 1.1
14.7 0.1
764.1 3.2
15.9 1.5
765.8 0.9
14.1 0.7
766.9 0.5
13.4 0.4
702.3 5.8b
99.1 15.8a
666.5 5.2a
136.9 3.7b
667.7 4.0a
131.3 0.6b
671.0 3.7a
141.6 5.3b
672.1 5.1a
139.8 1.5b
Fish fed the FO0 diet showed the highest moisture and the
lowest lipid content in viscera (P < 0.05), whereas the
moisture and lipid content of muscle were not signicantly
aected by dietary n-3 HUFA (P > 0.05).
Fatty
acid
Before
conditioning
After
conditioning
FO0
FO25
FO50
FO75
FO100
12:0
14:0
16:0
18:0
20:0
SFA1
16:1n-9
18:1n-9
20:1n-9
MUFA2
18:2n-6
20:4n-6
n-63
18:3n-3
20:5n-3
22:6n-3
n-34
HUFA5
PUFA6
n-3/n-6
2.7
28.0
10.0
0.3
40.9
3.5
26.9
2.0
32.4
14.9
1.3
16.2
0.9
1.9
7.8
10.6
11.0
26.8
0.7
2.6
27.4
8.9
0.3
39.1
3.3
28.9
2.1
34.8
14.6
1.5
16.1
0.9
1.9
7.1
10.0
10.5
26.1
0.6
5.9
6.7
22.6
6.3
0.3
41.7
7.8
33.5
1.9
43.7
5.2
2.8
8.4
0.3
0.6
5.2
6.1
8.6
14.5
0.7
5.3
5.8
21.8
5.9
0.2
39.1
6.0
29.5
2.1
37.9
6.2
3.3
9.5
0.4
1.6
11.6
13.6
16.5
23.1
1.4
2.5
4.0
23.7
6.3
0.2
36.7
5.7
29.0
1.9
36.8
9.7
2.4
12.2
0.8
1.9
11.7
14.3
16.0
26.5
1.2
1.9
3.6
23.9
6.8
0.2
36.4
5.3
27.6
2.2
35.3
9.6
2.2
11.7
0.7
2.5
13.5
16.7
18.2
28.4
1.4
0.4
2.5
26.3
7.3
36.4
5.9
28.0
2.2
36.1
10.5
1.8
12.3
0.8
2.5
11.9
15.2
16.2
27.5
1.2
..............................................................................................
Fatty
acid
Before
conditioning
After
conditioning
FO0
FO25
FO50
FO75
FO100
12:0
14:0
16:0
18:0
20:0
SFA1
16:1n-9
18:1n-9
20:1n-9
MUFA2
18:2n-6
20:4n-6
n-63
18:3n-3
20:5n-3
22:6n-3
n-34
HUFA5
PUFA6
n-3/n-6
3.9
37.4
12.4
0.6
54.4
4.1
27.7
2.3
34.1
7.1
0.5
7.6
0.3
0.8
2.9
4.0
4.1
11.6
0.5
0.1
2.8
26.2
10.2
0.2
39.6
4.6
44.9
2.4
52.0
6.7
0.5
7.1
0.4
0.2
0.8
1.3
1.4
8.4
0.2
7.0
8.5
24.2
7.4
51.4
9.0
28.6
2.2
40.4
3.9
2.0
6.5
0.3
1.4
1.7
3.4
8.2
0.3
7.4
8.6
26.2
7.1
49.3
6.6
31.9
2.1
40.6
6.6
1.2
7.8
0.7
1.7
2.3
2.9
10.1
0.3
4.0
6.0
29.8
8.3
0.5
48.5
6.7
31.9
2.4
41.0
5.4
1.3
6.7
0.6
3.2
3.8
5.1
10.5
0.6
3.4
5.8
29.2
8.2
46.7
7.0
35.1
2.7
44.8
5.6
0.6
6.2
2.3
2.3
2.9
8.5
0.4
0.9
4.1
31.9
8.1
44.9
7.0
33.3
2.9
43.2
8.0
0.9
8.8
3.0
3.0
3.9
11.9
0.3
SFA (12:0, 14:0 and 16:0) in muscle and liver were positively correlated with their concentration in dietary lipid,
respectively. Liver MUFA was positively correlated with
dietary MUFA while muscle MUFA negatively correlated. PUFA (mainly 18:2n-6) in muscle increased with
increasing dietary PUFA, whereas liver PUFA showed
negligible variation.
20:4n-6 in both muscle and liver were negatively correlated
with their dietary concentration. Conversely, muscle 20:5n-3
gradually increased with dietary 20:5n-3. The same pattern
of 22:6n-3 showed in liver also. However, 22:6n-3 and HUFA
in muscle were distinctly reduced in sh fed the FO0 diet.
In this study, gibel carp fed the FO25 and FO50 diets showed
better growth performance. The n-3 HUFA concentration in
the FO0, FO25, FO50, FO75 and FO100 diets accounted for 0,
5.17, 11.48, 16.22 and 20.84% in total fatty acids, which
equivalents to 0, 4, 9, 13 and 17 g kg)1 of the diet. This
might suggest that 49 g kg)1 n-3 HUFA was appropriate
for maximal growth for gibel carp. It is similar with other
freshwater shes including rainbow trout Oncorhynchus
mykiss (Takeuchi & Watanabe 1976), channel catsh (Satoh
..............................................................................................
(a)
40
20
12:0
30
15
20
10
y = 0.18x + 1.33 R2 = 0.89
10
14:0
y = 0.37x + 2.40
R2 = 0.89
5
y = 0.34x + 0.65 R2 = 0.96
0
0
10
20
35
30
40
y = 2.08x 5.61
R2 = 0.85
16:0
30
80
10
20
y = 0.96x + 8.11
R2 = 0.56
20
S FA
60
25
15
40
15
10
10
15
20
25
30
20
20
35
60
40
80
(b)
40
50
y = 0.86x + 20.48
R2 = 0.76
y = 0.35x + 36.20
R 2= 0.68
40
30
y = 0.87x + 41.34
y = 0.64x + 48.62
R2 = 0.74
30
R2 = 0.79
20
20
MUF
U A
18:1n-9
10
10
10
20
30
40
10
20
30
40
50
50
25
PUF
U A
18:2n-6
20
40
y = 0.32x + 3.90
15
30
R = 0.90
10
20
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
10
20
30
40
50
(c) 4
12
20:4n-6
20:5n-3
10
y = 1.51x + 3.13
R 2 = 0.72
2
y = 0.18x + 0.85
R2 = 0.91
y = 1.48x + 1.83
R2 = 0.76
0
0
0
25
15
22:6n-3
HUF
U A
12
R 2 = 0.87
15
10
y = 0.15x + 1.50
10
20
10
R 2 = 0.63
0
0
10
15
10
15
20
25
..............................................................................................
20
15
y = 0.39x + 12.19
2
R = 0.77
10
5
0
10
15
20
25
..............................................................................................
Muscle TBARS
(nmol MDA per mg protein)
Serum TBARS
(nmol MDA mL1)
25
10
8
y = 0.21x + 4.68
R = 0.80
4
2
0
10
15
20
25
The authors give great thanks to our technician Mr Guanghan NIE for his kind help with the rearing facility. The
study was supported by the earmarked fund for Modern
Agro-industry Technology Research System (NYCYTX-49)
and partly by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (30700626) and Hubei Science and Technology
Department (2006AA203A01) and the innovation project of
the Institute of Hydrobiology, the Chinese Academy of
Sciences. Thanks are also given to the anonymous reviewers
for their helpful suggestions.
AOAC (1984) Animal feed. In: Ocial Methods of Analysis, 14th edn
(Williams, S. ed.), pp. 152. Association of Ofcial Analytical
Chemists, Washington.
Ballestrazzi, R., Rainis, S. & Maxia, M. (2006) The replacement of
sh oil with rened coconut oil in the diet of large rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss). Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 5, 155164.
..............................................................................................
..............................................................................................
Sargent, J., Bell, G., McEvoy, L., Tocher, D. & Estevez, A. (1999)
Recent developments in the essential fatty acid nutrition of sh.
Aquaculture, 177, 191199.
Sargent, J.R., Tocher, D.R. & Bell, J.G. (2002) The lipids. In: Fish
Nutrition, 3rd edn (Halver, J.E. & Hardy, R.W. eds), pp. 181257.
Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Satoh, S., Poe, W.E. & Wilson, R.P. (1989) Studies on the essential
fatty acid requirement of channel catsh, Ictalurus punctatus.
Aquaculture, 79, 121128.
Stephan, G., Guillaume, J. & Lamour, F. (1995) Lipid peroxidation
in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) tissue: eect of dietary vitamin
E and dietary n-6 or n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Aquaculture,
130, 251268.
Stickney, R.R. & Andrews, J.W. (1972) Eects of dietary lipids on
growth, food conversion, lipid and fatty acid composition of
channel catsh. J. Nutr., 102, 249257.
Stickney, R.R., McGeachin, R.B., Lewis, D.H. & Marks, J. (1983)
Response of young channel catsh to diets containing puried
fatty acids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 112, 665669.
Takeuchi, T. & Watanabe, T. (1976) Nutritive value of x3 highly
unsaturated fatty acids in pollock liver oil for rainbow trout. Bull.
Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish., 42, 907919.
Takeuchi, T. & Watanabe, T. (1977) Requirement of carp for
essential fatty acids. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish., 43, 541551.
Takeuchi, T. & Watanabe, T. (1979) Eect of excess amount of
essential fatty acids on growth of rainbow trout. Bull. Jpn. Soc.
Sci. Fish., 45, 15171519.
Takeuchi, T., Watanabe, K., Yong, W.Y. & Watanabe, T. (1991)
Essential fatty acids of grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella. Nippon
Suisan Gakkaishi, 57, 467473.
Turchini, G.M., Torstensen, B.E. & Ng, W.K. (2009) Fish oil
replacement in nsh nutrition. Rev. Aquacult., 1, 1057.
Uchiyama, M. & Mihara, M. (1978) Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissue by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal. Biochem.,
86, 271278.
Watanabe, T., Takashima, F. & Ogino, C. (1974a) Eect of dietary
methyl linolenate on growth of rainbow trout. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci.
Fish., 40, 181188.
Watanabe, T., Ogino, C., Koshiishi, Y. & Matsunaga, T. (1974b)
Requirement of rainbow trout for essential fatty acids. Bull. Jpn.
Soc. Sci. Fish., 40, 493499.
Watanabe, T., Utsue, O., Kobayashi, I. & Ogino, C. (1975a) Eect of
dietary methyl linoleate and linolenate on growth of carp-1. Bull.
Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish., 41, 257262.
Watanabe, T., Takeuchi, T. & Ogino, C. (1975b) Eect of dietary
methyl linoleate and linolenate on growth of carp-2. Bull. Jpn. Soc.
Sci. Fish., 41, 263269.
Yu, T.C. & Sinnhuber, R.O. (1976) Growth response of rainbow
trout (Salmo gairdneri) to dietary x3 and x6 fatty acids. Aquaculture, 8, 309317.
Yu, T.C., Sinnhuber, R.O. & Putnam, G.B. (1977) Eect of dietary
lipids on fatty acid composition of body lipid in rainbow trout
(Salmo gairdneri). Lipids, 12, 495499.
Zhao, H. (2007) Studies on feeding stimulants for gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Doctoral thesis of the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, P. R. China.