58MoM SEAC

Minutes of the 58th meeting of the SEAC held on 1st to 4th August, 2012
Minutes of the 58th meeting of the

State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)
held on 1st to 4th August, 2012 at 10:00 A.M.
The following members were present for the committee meeting.
1. Dr. Sukumar Devotta
... Chairman
1st to 4th August, 2012
2. Er. G. K. Deshpande
Member
1st to 4th August,2012
3. Ar. Mukund S. Athavale
Member
4. Dr. Prashant P. Bhave
Member
5. Prof. Tarun Kant
Member
1st, 2nd & 4th August, 2012
6. Dr. Jay S. Samant
Member
7. Er. Chandrakant I. Sambutwad
Member
8. Er. Balbir Singh Sehgal
Member
9. Shri A. R. Parshurame
Member
Secretary
Member Secretary SEAC, Environment Department welcomed the members of the

committee.
Chairman
1
Internal Discussion item no. 1
Subject: MOEF O.M. No. L-11011/47/2011.IA.II(M) dated 18 May, 2012 regarding Order of
Honble Supreme Court dated 27.02.2012 in I.A. no. 12-13 of 2011 SLP (C) no.
19628-19629 in the matter of Deepak Kumar etc. Vs State of Haryana and Ors
Implementation thereof - Regarding
SEAC noted the OM dated 18 May, 2012 regarding Order of Honble Supreme Court dated
27.02.2012 in I.A. no. 12-13 of 2011 SLP (C) no. 19628-19629. As per the OM all mining project
of minor minerals irrespective of the size of the lease would henceforth require prior EC. These
projects has to be treated as Category B as defined in EIA Notificaiton, 2006 and to be considered
following the procedure prescribed under EIA Notificaiton 2006.
It was brought to the notice of the Committee that till date, about 41 projects listed below are
received for prior EC:
Sr.No.
1.
Date of
receipt of
proposal
01.06.2012
2.
14.06.2012
3.
20.06.2012
4.
26.06.2012
5.
02.07.2012
6.
7.
02.07.2012
09.07.2012
8.
09.07.2012
9.
12.07.2012
10. 12.07.2012
11. 12.07.2012
12. 14.07.2012
13. 16.07.2012
14. 16.07.2012
Name of the
proponent
Location of the project
Collector,
Sindhudurg
Collector,
Bhandara
Collector,
Sindhudurg
Collector,
Yavatmal
Collector,
Nagpur
Unique Stones
Sameer H.
Patel
Vinayak Stone
Crushing Co.
Rajesh
Badriprasad
Sharma
Altaf Ahmed
Kishor Laxman
Parwe
Sukhdayal
Lalchand Arora
Collector,
Nagpur
Collector,Latur
Sand dredging in Creeks of Kalawal, Karli, Mochemad,

Mithbav, Deogad, Vengurle, Achara.
Vainganga River. Bhandara & other locations.
Pice Kamthe-Varavade & other locations
Bori Gosavi & other locations
Rajola & other locations(102 locations)
Stone Quarry at Bilalpada, Tal. Vasai, District Thane.
Mouje Tiwari/ Rajawali, Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane (Stone
Crushing)
Shirgaon, Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane
Surgaon Stone Quarry, Tal.Umred,
Dist. Nagpur
Surgaon Stone Quarry, Tal.Umred, Dist. Nagpur
Surgaon Stone Quarry, Tal.Umred, Dist. Nagpur
Stone Quarry at Surgaon, Tal. Umred, Dist.Nagpur.
Dorli, Tal. Sawner, Dist. Nagpur (Sand Dredging)
Mouje Kekat Sindghi, Tal. Jalkot, Dist. Latur (Stone Quarry)
Chairman
2
15. 16.07.2012
16. 17.07.2012
17. 17.07.2012
18. 17.07.2012
19. 17.07.2012
20. 17.07.2012
21. 17.07.2012
22. 17.07.2012
23. 17.07.2012
24. 17.07.2012
25. 17.07.2012
26. 17.07.2012
27. 18.07.2012
28. 18.07.2012
29. 18.07.2012
30. 19.07.2012
31. 23.07.2012
32. 23.07.2012
33. 24.07.2012
34. 24.07.2012
35. 24.07.2012
36. 30.07.2012
37. 30.07.2012
Nitin K.
Vaidya
Collector,
Latur
Clive
Gonsalves
Hari P. Patel
Sebastine
Gonsalves
Stone Quarry at Mouje Surgaon, Tal. Umred, Dist. Nagpur
Francis
Gonsalves
A. J. Gonsalves
Smt. Shilpa
Almeida
Smt.
Dhoomi
Gonsalves
Harel
F.Almeida
Gajendra Stone
Industries
Pvt.Ltd.
Michel
Gonsalves
Vinod Hiralal
Gupta
Akanksha
Enterprises
Santosh H.
Gupta
Pruthvi
Construc-tion
Collector,
Latur
Prahad Stone
Crushing
Pvt.Ltd.
R.S.K.
Construction
Sur
Construction
Sandip
Manikrao
Pawar
Shree Sadhguru
Krupa Stone
Crusher Co.
Shree Laxmi
Stone
Industries
Stone Quarry at Village Khaire, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane
Stone Quarry at Mouje Ausa, Tal. Ausa, Dist.Latur

Stone Quarry at Mouje Khaire, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane
Stone Quarry at Village Dongaste, Tal. Wada, Dist. Thane
Stone Quarry at Village Dhaliv, Tal. Vasai, Dist.Thane

Stone quarry at Khaire,Tal. Wada, Distt.Thane

Stone quarry at Gunj,Tal.Wada,
Distt. Thane
Stone quarry at Khaire, Tal.Wada,Distt.Thane
Stone quarry at Usgaon, Tal.Vasai,Distt.Thane
Stone quarry at Borande,
Tal. Vikramgad, Dist.Thane.
Stone quarry at Waliv,
Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane.
Stone quarry at Mouje Dangorli,
Tal.& Dist. Gondia
Stone quarry at Mouje Hosur, Tal. Nilanga, Dist. Latur
Stone quarry at Mouje Dongaste, Tal. Wada,
Dist. Thane.
Stone quarry at Mouje Ushid, Tal. Kalyan,
Dist. Thane.
Stone quarry at Mouje Dakivali, Tal.Wada,
Dist. Thane
Stone quarry at Mouje Mandwa, Tal. & Dist. Wardha
Stone quarry at Mouje Dasai, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane
Stone quarry at Chinchwali, Tal. Ambarnath, Dist.Thane.
Chairman
3
38. 30.07.2012
39. 30.07.2012
40. 30.07.2012
41. 31.07.2012
Gajendra Stone
Industries
Collector,
Latur
Collector,
Latur
Naresh D.
Bhoyar
Stone quarry at Mouje Gunj, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane

107 Proposals for sand dredging at Salgara and other places in
Latur Dist.
Stone quarry at Mouje Ashta, Tal. Chakur, Dist.Latur
Stone quarryat Mouza Choramba, Tal.Arvi, Dist.Wardha
Committee noted that the proposals of sand dredging, stone quary etc are received from
different districts.
It is also brought to the notice of the Committee that the application form submitted by the
above proponents as per EIA Notificaiton, 2006 are not duly filled and without any required
information such as lease deed, project cost, available reserves, ecology of the region, details of
minerals extracted, impact on environment, mitigation management plan, a large scale layout plan
showing the site with approach roads etc. A prefeasibility report is also required along with the
statutory clearance from concerned authorities. These applications are usually submitted
individually without any consideration for other nmearby proposed activities. The Committee
deliberated on all issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology and
biodiversity and social aspects.
The committee is of the opinion that although there may be different mining activities
having area less than 5 ha for individual proposal, cumulative impacts of all activities, including
sand dredging, stone quarying etc., on the environment of that area has to be considered. This
cannot be done if the proposal appraised individually. Therefore, in the interest of environment
protection and speedy disposal of the applications, the competent authority (say District
Collector), who finally grants or renews the lease of such proposals shall submit periodically the
proposals showing all the proposed activity on one map, with details like reserves of minor
minerals, overall extraction done in recent time, management and monitoringof extraction and
addressing all issues related to environmental impact. This may be done through an accrediated
consultant.
Thus the Committee recommends following suggestions for orderly and quicker disposal of
such applications received:
1. The information furnished in Form-I shall be duly certified by the District Collector or the
competent authority nominated by the District Collector. Information in Form 1 shall have
all details listed above.
2. The applications shall be channellised through the Collector/ Mining Officer with NOC.
3. Environmental impacts due to existing activities and proposed activities shall be
incorporated into the combined proposal.
4. Information regarding any illegal mining and abandoned mining shall also be provided to
Environment Department as they very much impact the environment.
5. The application shall contain prefeasibility report, large site plan, layout plan etc as
indicated above.
6. However, each case will be taken up for appraisal separately..
Chairman
4
Internal Discussion item no. 2

Subject: Honble Bombay High Courts decision in Public Interest Litigation no.115 of 2010
with Civil Application no.143 of 2010 and Civil aAplication no.87 of 2012 and EC
issued to M/s Hindustan Electricity Generation Company Private Limited on 22 nd
February, 2012.
SEAC noted the Hon HighCourt decision dated 28 June 2012 in Public Interest Litigation no.115
of 2010 with Civil Application no.143 of 2010 and Civil Aplication no.87 of 2012. As per the
Honble High Courts decision, SEAC decided to appraise the project afresh only after PP
submitting the application in the prescribed format as per EIA Notification, 2006.
Chairman
5
Item No. 1
Subject: TOR for the proposed 19.8 MW Bagasse Based Cogen Power & Sugar
Modernization Unit (5000 TCD to 7500 TCD) at Venunagar, at Post Gursale413304, Tal. Pandharpur, Distt.Solapur by M/s. Shri Vithal Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Ltd.
(SEAC 2010/ CR-849/TC-2)
Decision:
The case was discussed for grant of ToR for Bagasse Based Cogen Power & Sugar
Modernization Unit (5000 TCD to 7500 TCD). SEAC also noted that this is a proposal for an
expansion of the existing 14 MW bagassae based power plant to 33.8 MW capacity. As per
Clause 2(ii) of the EIA Notification, 2006 Expansion and modernization of existing projects or
activities listed in the Schedule to this notification with addition of capacity beyond this limit
specified for the concerned sector, that is, projects or activities which cross the threshold limits
given in the Schedule, after expansion or modernization will be classified as A Category.
Considering this, SEAC decided that the expansion of Cogen power plant falls under Category
A and in the jurisdiction of MoEF. The proposed expansion of the sugar plant is interlinked
with the Cogen power plant hence PP is advised to approach MoEF for EC for both expansions of
sugar and cogeneration plants.
Chairman
6
Item No. 2
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Residential and Commercial
Development at Plot 7, Hinjewadi, Pune by M/s. International Biotech Park Ltd.
(File No. SEAC 2211/ CR-922/ TC2)
The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee noted
project details furnished by the Project Proponent as:
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Category
Previous
consideration/s
Location
Type of project
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other
area
Total Plot Area
The Crown Green Residential Development

M/s. International Biotech Park Ltd.
M/s, Aditya Environmental Services Pvt Ltd.
8(a) B2
56th meeting of the SEAC held on 6th to 8th June, 2012
Plot No. 7 at International Biotech Park Ltd., Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park,
MIDC Hinjewadi, Pune, Maharashtra
Construction Project
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC)
Total Plot Area: 17,800 sq m.

Net Plot Area: 16,020 sq.m
FSI 32,040 sq m.
Permissible
(including
TDR etc.)
Proposed Built-up
Area
Ground coverage
Percentage (%)
Estimated cost of the
project
No. of buildings &
its configuration
FSI area: 31,972.41 sq m.

Non FSI area: 29,040.45 sq m.
Total Built up area: 61,012.86 sq m.
28.82% (5129.22 sq m)
Rs. 82 Crores
No. of buildings: 3 nos.
Residential Buildings 1 (2 wings)
NT1
:
NT2
:
Residential Buildings 2 (2 wings)
NT3
:
NT4
:
G+21
G+21
G+21
G + 30
Chairman
7
Convenient Shopping
Building 3
Podium
Club house
Height of the
building
G+2
Ground floor
G+1
(above podium)
Residential
Buildings
Building
configuration
Height
in (m)
NT1
NT2
NT3
NT4
Convenient
Shopping
G+21
G+21
G+21
G+30
G+2
71.95m
71.95m
72.95m
100.40m
10.1
Ground floor
G+1
3.75
8.0
Podium
Club House
Land is vacant
Existing structure &

demolish of it-Details
with disposal
Water Conservation
Storm
drainage
Level of Ground Water Table : 5 to 7.2 m

Size and no of RWH tank (s) and Quantity: One Tank of 40 m3
Location of RWH Tanks: Along main UG Water tank
Size, nos of recharge pits and Quantity
Length:- 4 m
Width of pit:- 2.5 m
Depth of pit:- 3 m
Volume: 30 cu.m
Recharge pits: 8 nos.
Capital cost: 35 lakhs
O&M cost: 0.4 lakhs/annum
water Natural water drainage pattern: North to south
Quantity of storm water 544 cum/hour assumed at rainfall intensity of
50 mm/hour
Size of SWD : sized as per design max rainfall intensity of 50 mm/hour
Total
Water Dry Season:
Requirement
Fresh Water (cmd) 114.32 cmd Source : MIDC
Recycled Water:- 117.57 cmd
Total Water Requirement:-231.92 cmd
Swimming pool makeup (cmd):-NA
Fire fighting (cmd):- 100 m3
Wet Season:
Fresh Water (cmd) 114.32 cmd Source : MIDC
Chairman
8
Sewage and Waste

water
Solid waste
Management
Green Belt
Development
Total Water Requirement:-231.92 cmd

Swimming pool makeup (cmd):-NA
Fire fighting (cmd):- 100 m3
Sewage generation (cmd) : 161.87
STP technology: MBBR Technology
Capacity of STP: 170 cmd
Location of STP : South west corner of plot
Waste generation in Pre Construction and Construction phase
Waste Generation :- Debris 1-3 MT/day
Quantity of Top soil to be preserved : 2937 cum
Disposal of construction way debris : used for filling the plot and
maintaining natural slopes
Waste Generation in Operation Phase
Dry waste Kg/day:- 334.69
Wet waste Kg/day:- 334.69
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) Kg/day : 0.13
Mode of Disposal of Waste : Dry waste: - segregation and sale of recyclables, inerts to approved
landfill site.
Wet waste :- biodegradable waste to compost
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : mix with wet waste and convert that into
compost
Area Requirement : Location and Total area provided for the treatment and
storage of solid waste : 500 sft utility area
Budgetary allocation:
O&M cost: 4 lakhs
1. RG area other than greenbelt (please specify for playground etc) (sq.
m.):- 1850 sq m.
2. RG area under Green Belt
1. RG on the ground (sq.m) : 5987.22
2. RG on the podium (sq.m) : 2240.19
3. Plantation
Number & list of Tree species to be planted in the ground RG: 134
nos + 84 nos. of existing trees to be retained.
Tree species considered for plantation :
Sr. No. Tree species
Numbers
1
Laburnum (Cassia fistula)
16
2
Coral tree (Erythrina indica)
10
3
Mango (Magnifera indica)
13
4
Sita Ashoka (Saraca ashoka)
31
5
Silk Cotton Tree (Bombax
14
malabaricum)
6
Coconut (Cocos nucifera)
11
7
Amla (Embilica officinalis)
16
8
Palas (Butea Frontosa)
10
Chairman
9
Jamun (Syzygium cumini)
Tree species Existing & to be retained:

Sr. Tree species
No.
1
Jambhul (Sygygium cumini)
2
Umbar (Ficus racemosa)
3
Sawar (Bombax malabaricum)
4
Ain (Terminalia tomentosa)
5
Behda (Terminalia belirica)
6
Neem (Azadirachta indica)
7
Moi (Lannea coromandelica)
8
Grewia (Grewia spp)
9
Waras (Heterophragma
roxburghii)
10
Bartondi (Morinda pubescens)
11
Bhokar (Cordia spp)
12
Babhul (Acacia nilotica)
13
Kaire (Acacia catechu)
14
Chandan (Santanum album)
15
Bor (Zyzyphus spp)
16
Asana (Bridelia retusa)
17
Bartondi (Morinda pubescens)
18
Umbar (Ficus racemosa)
19
Pandhara Shirish (Albizia
procera)
20
Moha (Madhuca Indica)
21
Awala (Emblica officinalis)
22
Sag (Tectona grandis)
13
Numbers
03
05
06
22
01
05
08
08
01
03
01
01
02
03
02
01
01
03
01
04
02
01
Number & list of Shrub & bushes species to be planted in the

podium RG : approx 200 nos
Typical species :
Sr.
Scientific name
Common name
No.
1
Caesalpinia pulcherrima
White Gulmohor
2
Clerodendrum inerme
Kadumendi
3
Clerodendrum
infortunatum
4
Duranta repens
5
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
Chinese Hibiscus
6
Lawsonia inermis
Henna
7
Nerium indicum
Pink Oleander
8
Nyctanthus arbor-tristis
Parijatak
9
Tecoma stans
Tecoma
Chairman
10
Energy
Number, size age and species of trees to be cut or transplanted :

Existing trees 84 nos.
Trees to be transplanted 84 nos.
NOC for the tree cutting/transplantation / compensatory plantation if any
: NOC obtained from Forest Department
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost)

Capital cost
O&M cost
( Rs in lakhs)
(Rs in lakhs)
50
3.0
Green belt
Power supply :
Maximum Demand 120 KVA Construction phase & 1995 KVA
during Operation phase
Connected Load: 4803KVA during Operation Phase
Source : MSEDCL
Energy saving by non-conventional method :
Energy Saving Measure:
Detailed calculations & % of saving
We propose to install solar water heating panels and supply hot
water to bathrooms in complex. Also solar based lighting will be
provided in garden pathways.
Traffic Management
Energy saving can be achieved due to following:

1. Use of CFL lamps instead of GLS lamps for flats
2. Use of CFL lamps instead of GLS lamps for common area lights
3. Use of T5 lamps instead of Normal Fluorescent lamps in basements
4. Using electronic ballast for discharge lamps
5. Energy saving by using 13 watt CFL lamps as against 60 W
incandescent lamps for houses
Capital cost
O&M cost
(Rs in lakhs)
(Rs in lakhs)
Energy Saving Devices +
65
2.0
Solar Heater/ lighting
DG Set: 2 nos. x 320 KVA
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: 1 No.
Parking Details :
Number & area of basement : 2 nos & 10,849.69 sq.m
Number & area of podium : 1 no x 2440.19 sq.m
Open Parking: 67 nos.(Surface Parking)
Covered Parking: 534 (14185.56 sq.m.) (Basement+Podium+Stilts)
Total parking area: 15023.06 sq.m (Basement+ Podium+ Stilts+
Surface)
Area per car: Basement 26.72 sq.m. Per car Podium 22.18 sq.m. Per
Chairman
11
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
car Overall Covered: 26.56 sq.m. Per car

2-Wheeler: 54 nos required 54 Nos. Provided
4-Wheeler: 601 nos. required & 601 Nos. Provided
Width of all Internal roads: - 9.0
Construction phase:
Capital Cost: 55 Lakhs
Recurring Cost per annum: 1.5 Lakhs / Annum
Operation Phase:
Decision:
The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made and documents submitted by
the proponent. All issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology and
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. The PP is directed to comply with the following
observations:
1. Submit the consent for water supply (potable & non potable) and drainage facility
from the competent authority indicating the time frame.
2. Modify the surface car parking close to building to facilitate unobstructed fire tender
movement.
3. Ensure adequate natural ventilation and lighting in the basements by providing suitable
cutouts.
4. Submit details of adherence to NBC codes w.r.t. earthquake resistant structures, lift
and fire and safety. One of the staircases shall be of minimum 2 m width.
5. Submit NOCs from CFO and AAI.
6. Carry out proper hydrogeological testings and furnish the details along with design of
Rain Water Harvesting and Storm Water Drainage Syatem with large layout plan.
7. Estimate natural flow run-off during mansoon and indicate appropriate steps to avoid
flooding.
8. Draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP, as the proposed EMP budget is
inadequate especially w.r.t. safety aspects and operational expenditures.
9. Plant in the green area on ground (i.e. 5970 m2) with 134 nos of trees. Though this is a
residential project in MIDC, it shall have minimum tree cover, 49 trees per acre, i.e.
600 nos of trees.
10. Avoid transplantation of trees by retaining the trees as many as possible in their
original locations.
Chairman
12
Item No. 3
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Residential & Commercial Development
at Plot No 17 MIDC Hinjewadi, Pune by M/s. International Biotech Park Ltd.
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Category
Previous
consideration/s
Location
Type of project
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other
area
Total Plot Area
The Crown Greens - Residential Development

M/s. International Biotech Park Ltd.
M/s, Aditya Environmental Services Pvt Ltd.
8(a) B2
56th meeting of the SEAC held on 6th to 8th June, 2012
Plot No. 17 at International Biotech Park Ltd., Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park,
MIDC Hinjewadi Phase II, Pune, Maharashtra
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC)
Total Plot Area: 21,330 sq m.

Net Plot Area: 19,197 sq.m
Permissible
FSI 38,394 sq m.
(including TDR etc.)
FSI area: 38,207.33 sq m.
Proposed Built-up
Non FSI area: 39,682.48 sq m.
Area
Total Built up area: 77,889.82 sq m.
17.55% (3743.17 sq m.)
Ground coverage
Percentage (%)
Estimated cost of the Rs. 104 Crores
Project
No. of buildings &
No. of buildings: 7 nos.
its configuration
5 Residential Buildings
T1
:
T2
:
T3
:
T4
:
T5
:
1 Convenient Shopping and
service apartment
G+15
G+21
G+21
G+26
G+27
G+5
Chairman
13
Height of the
building
1 Club house
5 Residential
Buildings
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
1 Convenient
Shopping and
service apartment
1 Club house
Land is vacant
Building
configuration
G+15
G+21
G+21
G+26
G+27
G+5
G+2
Height
in (m)
53.65m
71.95m
71.95m
87.2m
90.25m
27.0m
G+2
15.0m
Existing structure &

demolish of it-Details
with disposal
Water Conservation
Storm
drainage
UGT tank
Level of Ground Water Table : 5 to 7.2 m

Size and no of RWH tank (s) and Quantity: One Tank of 40 m3
Location of RWH Tanks: Along main UG Water tank
Size, nos of recharge pits and Quantity
Length:- 4 m
Width of pit:- 2.5 m
Depth of pit:- 3 m
Volume: 30 cu.m
Recharge pits: 8 nos.
O&M cost: 0.4 lakhs/annum
water Natural water drainage pattern: North to south
Quantity of storm water 1296 cum/hour assumed at rainfall intensity of
50mm/hour
Size of SWD sized as per design max rainfall intensity of 50 mm/hour
In the extended basement away from STP area (East of Tower T1)
Total
Water Dry Season:
Fresh Water : 157.50 cmd Source: MIDC
Requirement
Recycled Water:- 171.65cmd
Total Water Requirement:- 329.15 cmd
Swimming pool makeup (CMD):- 10 cmd
Fire fighting (CMD):- 300 m3
Wet Season:
Fresh Water : 157.50 cmd Source : MIDC&Rain
Total Water Requirement:- 271.76 cmd
Swimming pool makeup (CMD):- 10 cmd
Fire fighting (CMD):- 300 m3
Chairman
14
Sewage and Waste

water
Solid waste
Management
Green Belt
Development
Sewage generation (cmd) : 201.93

STP technology: MBBR Technology
Capacity of STP: 210 cmd
Location of STP : UG - south of Tower 1
Waste generation in Pre Construction and Construction phase:
Waste Generation :- Debris 1-3 MT/day
Quantity of Top soil to be preserved : 3520 cum
Disposal of construction way debris : used for filling the plot and
maintaining natural slopes
Waste Generation in Operation Phase:
Dry waste Kg/day: 423.2
Wet waste Kg/day: 423.2
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 0.2 TPD
Mode of Disposal of Waste : Dry waste: - segregation and sale of recyclables, inerts to approved
landfill site.
Wet waste :- biodegradable waste to compost
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : mix with wet waste and convert that into
compost
Area Requirement: Location and Total area provided for the treatment and
storage of solid waste : 500 sft utility area
O&M cost: 4 lakhs
Total RG area :
RG area other than greenbelt (please specify for playground etc) (sq.
m.):- 2152.87 sq m.
RG area under Green Belt
RG on the ground (sq.m): 6810.39 sq.m.
Plantation
Number & list of Tree species to be planted in the ground RG : 160
nos + 61 existing trees to be retained
Tree species for plantation
Numbers
1
Laburnum (Cassia fistula)
21
2
Coral tree (Erythrina indica)
10
3
Mango (Magnifera indica)
16
4
Sita Ashoka (Saraca ashoka)
55
5
10
malabaricum)
6
17
7
15
8
16
Tree species Existing & to be retained:
Numbers
Chairman
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jambhul (Sygygium cumini)

Ain (Erythrina indica)
Palas (Magnifera indica)
Umbar (Saraca ashoka)
malabaricum)
10
8
12
9
2
6
10
4
Number & list of Shrub & bushes species to be planted in the podium
RG : Species considered
Sr. No. Scientific name
Common name
1
Caesalpinia pulcherrima
White Gulmohor
2
Clerodendrum inerme
Kadumendi
3
Clerodendrum
infortunatum
4
Duranta repens
5
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
Chinese Hibiscus
6
Lawsonia inermis
Henna
7
Nerium indicum
Pink Oleander
8
Nyctanthus arbor-tristis
Parijatak
9
Tecoma stans
Tecoma
Number, size age and species of trees to be cut or transplanted :
Existing trees 61 nos.
Trees to be transplanted 48 nos.
Trees to be retained 13 Nos.
Trees to be cut : NIL
Total no. of trees to be planted: 160 nos
NOC for the tree cutting/transplantation / compensatory
plantation if any : NOC obtained from Forest Department
Capital cost O&M cost
( Rs in
(Rs in lakhs)
lakhs)
50
3
Green belt
Energy
Power supply :
Maximum Demand: 3669.0 KW
Connected Load: 5297.75 KW
Source : MSEDCL
Energy saving by non-conventional method :
Energy Saving Measure : as below + solar water heater/solar
lighting on podium
Detailed calculations & % of saving
Chairman
16
Traffic Management
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
We propose to install solar water heating panels and supply hot

water to bathrooms in complex. Also solar based lighting will be
provided in garden pathways.
Energy saving can be achieved due to following:
1. Use of CFL lamps instead of GLS lamps for flats
2. Use of CFL lamps instead of GLS lamps for common area lights
3. Use of T5 lamps instead of Normal Fluorescent amps in basements
4. Using electronic ballast for discharge lamps
5. Energy saving by using 13 watt CFL lamps as against 60 W
incandescent lamps for houses
Capital cost
O&M cost
(Rs in lakhs)
(Rs in
lakhs)
65
2
Energy Saving Devices + Solar
Heater/ lighting
DG Set: 2 nos. x 400 KVA
Type of fuel used : HSD
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: 1No.
Parking Details :
Number & area of basement: 2 nos. & 17922.78 sq.m
Number & area of podium : Nil
Open parking: 158 cars (Surface Parking)
Covered parking: 541 Cars 19243.91 Sq.m (Basement+Stilts)
Total parking area: 21218.91 sq.m (Basement+Stilts+Surface Parking)
Area per car :
Basement 34.59 sq.m./car (17922.78sq.m./518 cars)
Overall Covered 35.57 sq.m. Per car
2-Wheeler :- 63 nos. required & 69 nos. provided
4-Wheeler :- 696 nos. required & 699 nos. provided
Public Transport: Bus siding provided
Width of all Internal roads: - 9.0
Construction phase:
Operation Phase:
Decision:
The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made and documents submitted by the
proponent. All issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology and
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed.The PP is directed to comply with the following
observations:
Chairman
17
1. Submit the consent for water supply (potable & non potable) from the competent authority
indicating the time frame.
2. Modify the surface parking close to building and near the terrace plot for better fire tender
movement.
3. Ensure adequate natural ventilation and lighting in the basements by providing suitable
cutouts.
4. Submit details of adherence to NBC codes w.r.t. earthquake resistantstructures, lift and
fire and safety. One of the staircases shall be of minimum 2 m width.
1. Carry out proper hydrogeological testings and furnish the details along with design of
Rain Water Harvesting and Storm Water Drainage Syatem with large layout plan.
2. Estimate natural flow run-off during mansoon and indicate appropriate steps to avoid
flooding.
5. Draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP, as the proposed EMP budgets for
capital and O&M costs are inadequate.
6. Ensure prevailing stipulations regarding allotment of minimum percentage of flats to Low
Income Group (LIG).
7. Though this is a residential project, it shall have maximum tree cover as presented i.e. 49
trees per Acre, i.e. 584 nos of trees on the green area (i.e. 5847 m2) on the ground..
Chairman
18
Item No. 4
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed residential Scheme Atria Grande at
S.No. 2/2/1, 2/1/1, 6/3/4 Autade Handewadi by M/s. Atria Constructions
(File No. SEAC 2011/CR-981/ TC2)
Name of the Project
Proposed residential Scheme Atria Grande
M/s. Atria Constructions
Project Proponent
M/s. Saitech Research & Development Organization
Consultant
S.No.
2/2/1, 2/1/1, 6/3/4 Autade Handewadi
Construction project
Type of Project
8(a) B2
Category
Whether in
Grampanchyat of Autade Handewadi
Corporation /
Special regulations for area within 10 km distance from the
Municipal / Other area
boundary of the Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal
Corporation. GR No :- TPS-1809/650/CR/1654/09/UD-13
Applicability of the
A class municipal bye-laws for town planning area
DCR
Special regulations for area within 10 km distance from the
boundary of the Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal
Corporation. GR No :- TPS-1809/650/CR/1654/09/UD-13
31973.00 sq. m.
Total plot area (Sq.m)
Deductions
Net plot area
28345.65 sq. m.
Permissible FSI
Proposed Built UP
FSI area:28330.06 Sq. m
Area (FSI & Non FSI)
Non FSI:12239.78 Sq. m
Total BUA area: 40569.84 Sq. m
Ground coverage
percentage (%)
(Note : percentage of
plot not open to sky)
project
No. of building & its
configuration (s)
Number of tenants and
shops
Number of expected
residents / users
11343 sq.m
Ground coverage percentage : 35.47 %
66 crores
5 buildings (A, B, C, D, E,) each of 11 floors and 01 building (F)
of 9 floors. Provision for parking at ground floor for all buildings
except provision for additional parking in stilt at building C.
494
2470
Chairman
19
Height of the
building(s)
Building A
P+11
34.20 m
Building B
P+11
34.20 m
Building C
B+P+11
36.00 m
Building D
P+11
34.20 m
Building E
P+11
34.20 m
Building F
P+9
28.50 m
Right of way (width of
24.0 m wide RP road connects to Saswad Katraj State
the road)
Highway
The nearest fire station is located in the Hadapsar Industrial
Estate which is approximately 5.0 Km drive from the
proposed site
1st stage NOC (before Construction ) from Fire Department
has been obtained
Turning radius for easy 7.5m
access of fire tender
movement from all
around the building
excluding the width for
the plantation
Total Water
Dry Season Wet Season
Requirement
Fresh Water (CMD)
234
223
Recycled Water (CMD) 267
112
Total
501
335
Fire Fighting
250
250
Rain Water Harvesting Level of the Ground water table: 40 M
(RWH)
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: 1 nos capacity112000 lit
Location of the RWH tank (s) shown in dwg on the north east
side of the plot
Size, no of recharge pits and Quality 14*1*50 m3
Budgetary allocation ( Capital cost and O & M cost) :
Capital Cost : 15 Lakhs
O&M: 1.0 Lakhs
1 UGT shown in drawing at the North West corner of the plot.
UGT tanks
Strom water drainage
Sewage and waste

water
Natural water drainage pattern - West to East

Quantity of storm water 10965.72cum(potential rain water
harvesting cum/year), Size of SWD -150mm min
Sewage generation (CMD) :267
STP technology
:Fludised Aerobic Bed reactor
Capacity of STP (CMD)
:270
Location of the STP
:South East corner of Project
site
DG sets (during emergency) :1 * 200 KVA
Budgetary allocation: 70 lakhs capital cost and 12 lakh O & M
Chairman
20
Solid waste
Management
Green Belt
Development
Waste generation in the pre Construction and Construction

phase:
Waste generation :- Excavated soil will be used for leveling
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: 3909.45 cu m of
excavated topsoil shall be preserved for future use in green
areas.
Disposal of the construction way debris: No debris
Waste generation in the operation phase:
Dry waste :444.6 kg/day
Wet waste: 666.9 kg/day
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day):20.7 Kg/day
Mode Of Disposal
Dry waste (Kg/day): Sent to Kabadiwada
Wet waste (Kg/day): Converted to compost by Mechanical
Method
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day): Taken to compost
Area requirement: Location (s)& total area provided for the
storage & treatment of solid Waste: South East corner, Near
STP 2000 Sq. Ft.
Budgetary allocation( capital Cost & O&M cost):
O & M cost: 1.5 lakhs per year
Total RG area:
1. RG area other than green belt: 2047.7 sq. m.
2. RG area under green belt: 7710.0 sq.m
RG on the ground:7710 Sq.m.
Plantation:
No.
Botanical
name
Comman name
Qty
Ht. in
m
T1
Cassia fistula
Golden shower
46
4-5
T2
Caryota urens
Fishtail palm
17
4-6
T3
Cassia javanica
Pink cassia
60
10-12
T4
Lagerstroemia
flosreginae
Lagerstroemia
pink
28
8-10
T5
Nyctanthes
arbor-tristis
Parijat
27
5-6
T6
Bauhinia
acuminata
Bauhinia dwarf
white
46
3-4
Chairman
21
T7
Thevetia
nerifolium
Bitti yellow
3-5
T8
Mimusops
elengii
Bakul
24
10-12
T9
Plumeria alba
Champa white
4-5
T10
Populus
termuloides
Poplar
32
12-15
T11
Alstonia
scholaris
Saptaparni
27
8-10
T12
Erythrina indica
variegated
Pangara
variegated
37
8-10
T13
Bauhinia
purpurea
Kanchan
103
5-6
T14
Michelia
champaka
Sonchafa
15
5-6
T15
Filicium
decipiens
Fern tree
30
5-6
T16
Lagerstroemia
flos-regineae
Tamhan
8-10
Shrubs & GroundcoverNo.
Botanical name
S1
Lantana white/purple/red
S1
Abelia variegated
S3
Wadelia trilobata
S4
Ixora Chinese orange
S5
Cuphea hyssopifolia
S6
Galphimea glauca
S7
Hamelia patens dwarf
Chairman
22
S8
Allamanda nerifolia nana
S9
Canna red/yellow dwarf
S10
Eranthemum laxiflorum
S11
Oleander dwarf single red
S12
Plumbago capensis blue
S13
Musseanda erythrophylla red
S14
Ophiophogon jaburan variegated
S15
Rhoeo
S16
Spathyphyllum
S17
Agloenoema
S18
Allamanda violaceae
S19
Acalypha wilkesiana rosea flat leaf
S20
Alpinia speciosa
S21
Calliandra dwarf red
S22
Tabernaemonata coronaria variegata
S23
Pentas red
S24
Myana erecta dwarf
S25
Hibiscus rosa sinensis varieties
S26
Schefflera variegated
S27
Bamboo grass
S28
Pampas grass
Number , Size , Age and Species of tress to be cut , tress to be

transplanted - 5 babul trees will be cut
Budgetary allocation
O&M Cost: 1 Lakh/annum
Chairman
23
Energy
Traffic Management
Power Supply:
Maximum demand 1976 KW + 365 KW = 2341 KW
Connected Demand 5457 KW
Source
MSDECL
Energy saving by non-conventional method:
Solar energy will be used for landscape lighting.
The controls of all the electrical points in the flats will be
provided at the entrance with the provision of the Key Tag
Switch.
All Fluorescent lights (used in common areas) with
Electronic ballast in place of Copper chokes & Tube - T5
type, in place of T8 type, to reduce the power consumption
by 10 watts per lamp.
Use of APFC panel for Power factor correction. Some
benefits of power factor corrections are as follows:
- Reduce power consumption.
- Reduce electricity bill.
- Improve electrical efficiency.
- Extra kVA availability from existing supply.
- Reduce I2R losses from transformer and distribution
equipment.
- Minimized voltage drop in long cables.
Lighting control systems will be used to control parking area
lights.
Detail calculations & % of saving: 9.37%
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: Yes
Budgetary allocation( capital Cost& O& M Cost)
Capital Cost 10.0 Lakhs (Solar Lighting)
O & M Cost 0.2 Lakhs/annum (Solar Lighting)
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used 1x200 KVA
Type of fuel used Diesel
Nos. Of the Junction to the main road & design of confluence
Project site gets connected to Mumbai Pune Express highway
& Bopdev Ghat road through Katraj Saswad State Highway
Parking details:
Number & area of basement: nil
Number & area of podia: nil
Total parking area : 8333.60 sq.m.
Area per car :
2- wheeler :3.00 sq.m.
Cycle
: 1.40 sq.m.
Chairman
24
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
4-wheeler :20.0 sq.m.

Public Transport
Width of all Internal road(m): 6m (minimum)
Construction Phase ( With break up):
Capital Cost - PPE Rs. 1 lakh , Temp soak pit- Rs. 50,000
Safety Nylon net Rs. 50,000/- and Green belt : Rs. 1.0 lakhs
Total = Rs. 3.0 lakhs
Operation Phase( with break Up) Capital Cost: Cost of STP
: 70 lakhs
Compost Unit
: 15 lakhs
O & M cost: Rs. 13.5 lakhs per annum
Quantum & generation of Corpus Fund and Commitment:
Corpus fund of 30 lakhs will be collected from the members of
society for STP and Composting. This fund will be deposited in
the Bank Account to be maintained by the Society
Responsibility for Further O&M: Society bye laws will be
framed for O&M, once the Society is formed.
Decision:
observations:
1. The Committee noted that the existing right of way is limited to 9 m, however there is
proposed DP road of 24 m width. It is not clear when the DP road will be built and the
project cannotbe considered until the 24 m DP road is constructed. However PP has
agreed to undertake that, in case there is any delay in construction of DP road, PP
would construct the same at his own cost, without which OC may not be issued.
2. Deduction of 9 m road in netplot area and additional deduction of some part of 24m
road shall be clarified with a detailed note and supporting documents.
3. Relocate STP and underground water tank/s to a suitable location close to building.
4. Staircase width shall be at least 1.5 m.
5. Submit a detailed note and flowchart on water budget calculations.
6. Provide minimum 9 m road width of internal roads for ease in fire tender movement
and submit the revised drawings.
7. Design appropriate Rain Water Harvesting system and Storm Water Drainage system
as per the hydrogeological and geotechnical study data and conditions and submit the
details with large lay out drawings.
inadequate.
Chairman
25
9. Considering the area of RG on ground, number of trees to be planted is 700. The

northen narrow plot to be planted with trees, as the u/g water tanks are to be shifted to
suitable location
10. Submit a copy of the NA order.
Chairman
26
Item No. 5
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Residential and commercial development at Sus,
Mulshi, Pune by M/s. High Sea Properties (Compliance case)
(File No. SEAC 2011 / CR- 70 / TC2)
Name of the Project
Western Hill Project

M/s. High Seas Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Project Proponent
Consultant
Location of the project On Proposed site to be set up at, S. No.: 45/1, 45/2, 46/1 & 46/2, 4,
7/2, 44/1,44/2,43/1 Sus, At. Po. Mulshi, Pune, Maharashtra
Type of Project
8(a) B2
Category
55th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)
Previous
held on 21st to 24th May, 2012
consideration/s
Town Planning, Sus, At. Po. Mulshi, Pune
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other area
Total Plot Area: 1,13,530 Sq. mt.
Total Plot Area (sq.
Net plot area: 66,416.12 Sq. mt.
m.)Deductions
Net Plot area
Net Permissible FSI: 1,01,179.7 m2
Permissible FSI
FSI: 1,01,179.7 Sq.mt.
Proposed Built-up
Non FSI: 30,438.13 Sq.mt.
Area
Total: 1,31,617.83 Sq.mt.
(FSI & Non-FSI)
15838.23 Sq. mt.
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
(Note: Percentage of
Rs. 250 Cr.
project
42 nos. residential bldgs + 12 nos. of Villas + Convenience Shopping
Center
configuration(s)
Chairman
27
Name of building
A1 A6
B1 B4
C1
D1- D5
E1 E4
P+4
P+ 4
P+ 4
P+ 4
P+4
F1, F2, F3
P + 12
G1- G16
P + 12
P + 12
H1, H2, H3
12 nos. of Villas
Convenient Shopping Center
Number of tenants
and shops
Number of expected
residents / users
Height of the
building(s)
Right of way (Width
of the road)
Turning radius for
easy access of fire
tender movement from
all around the building
excluding the width
for the plantation
Existing structure(s)
Details of the
demolition with
disposal (If applicable)
Total Water
Requirement
Rain Water
Configuration
Parking + 2 floor
Gr. + 1 UF
Total tenants: 1299 nos.

Shops: 46 nos.
6587 no. persons
36 m
30 m wide Sus Road
9.0 m
No existing structures.
No demolition work.
Dry season:
Source : Grampanchyat , Sus, At. Po. Mulshi, Pune
Fresh water: 616 m3/day
Recycled water: 444 m3/day
Total Water Requirement: 1060 m3/day
Swimming pool make up: 30 m3
Fire fighting: 100 m3
Excess treated water: 309 m3/day
Wet Season:
Source : Grampanchyat , Sus, At. Po. Mulshi, Pune
Fresh water : 616 m3/day
Recycled water: 295 m3/day
Total Water Requirement: 911 m3/day
Swimming pool make up: 30 m3
Fire fighting: 100 m3
Excess treated water: 458 m3/day
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity : 1 no. of tank with
Chairman
28
Harvesting
(RWH)
UGT tanks
Storm water drainage
Sewage and Waste

water
Solid waste
Management
Green Belt
Development
capacity of 40 m3 with size of 1.9m 7.19m 3m

Location of the RWH tank(s) : Underground tank
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity : 12 nos.
Size of the recharge pit = 3 m x 3 m x 3 m
No of recharge pit proposed = 12 Nos.
Depth for Bore = Varying depth and Up to Below Ground water
table
Locations of the UGT tanks :1 UG tank is near B1 building
1 UG tank is near E1 building
Natural water drainage pattern : By gravity
Quantity of storm water : 31.45 m3/min
Size of SWD : 0.45m width & 0.2 m depth @ slope 1:200
Sewage generation : 793 m3/day
STP technology : Sequential Batch Reactor [SBR technology]
Capacity of STP : 886 m3/day
Location of the STP: On Ground
Waste generation in the Pre Construction & Construction phase:
Waste generation : 38 kg /day
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved : None
Disposal of the construction way debris : None
Waste generation in the operation Phase:
Dry waste : 1473 kg/day
Wet waste : 1473 kg/day
E waste : very less amount
Hazardous waste : 5-6 lit/month used oil
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable) : Not applicable
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : 79 kg/day
Mode of Disposal of waste:
Dry waste : Handed over to authorized recycler for further handling
and disposal.
Wet waste: Will be converted to compost using Organic Waste
Processor [OWP] model no. KC 1000 & KC 500
E waste : Handed over to PCB authorized Vendor
Hazardous waste : Handed over to PCB authorized Vendor
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : Will be used as manure for gardening
Area requirement:
Location(s) : On Ground; Total area provided for the storage &
Treatment of the solid waste : For KC 1000 - 130 m2 & For model
no. 500 - 100 m2
RG area other than green belt (Please specify for playground,
etc.)i.e Open space [10%]: 10574.55 m2
RG area under green belt:
1. Plantation area : 10,968.6 m2, 2. Lawn area : 7621.022 m2
Chairman
29
Energy
SR.
NO.
POWER REQUIREMENT
Source of power supply : Source : MSEDCL
During Construction Phase
3
4
During Operation Phase

a) Total Demand Load
100 kVA
Residential :- 5859 KW
Commercial :- 574 KW
DG set as Power Back up
D.G. Sets
1 nos. x 125 KVA
During Operation Phase
Fuel used for DG set :

a. Diesel / High Speed Diesel
Trasnformers
Residential :- 1 X 250 kVA & 1 X 315 kVA

Commercial :- 1 X 600 kVA
Diesel
Residential :- 10 X 630 kVA
Commercial :- 1 X 630 kVA
Traffic Management
Cars: 1006 nos. ,Scooters: 1732 nos.

Cycle: 1732 nos. , Total parking area: 27,740.8 sq. m.
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Construction phase: 17.2 lakhs

Operation Phase: Capital cost: 435 lakhs and O&M cost: 68.53
lakhs/annum
Decision:
SEAC discussed the issues raised in the previous meeting. It is noted that PP has obtained NA
permission only for 48,000 m2 out of total plot area of 1,13,530 m2. The project location is in the
rural area and NA is a prerequisite before the commencement of the project. The PP informed that
the revenue authorities had instructed them to obtain EC for the entire project in order to obtain
NA permission for the rest of the plot area. SEAC is of the opinion that prior EC is not
precondition for NA permission. Process of NA conversion involves land use change and NA also
prescribes the zoning and FSI applicability. Therefore, PP is advised to phase the project on the
basis of currently available NA plot or obtain NA permission for the entire plot.
Detailed appraisal of the project will be done after the submission of the above said data.
Chairman
30
Item No. 6
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Educational Institute with Hostel Facility
Project - Symbiosis Teaching Hospital and Research Centre at Gat No. 936(1) &
936(2) (part), 937,938,939,940,941,946(1)(Part), 946 (2 )(Part) at Lavale, Near
Lupin Laboratory, Tal. : Mulshi, Pune, State Maharashtra by M/s Symbiosis
Society
(File No. SEAC 2211 / CR-927/ TC2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Category
proposed Educational Institute with Hostel Facility Project - Symbiosis

Teaching Hospital and Research Centre
M/s Symbiosis Society
M/s Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy & Laboratory
Gat No. 936(1) & 936(2) (part), 937,938,939,940,941,946(1)(Part), 946
(2 )(Part) at Lavale, Near Lupin Laboratory, Tal. : Mulshi, Pune, State
Maharashtra
Educational Institute with Hostel Facility - Construction Project
8(a) B2
Whether in Corporation / Planning Authority: Town Planning Department, Pune.

Jurisdiction : Collector, Pune in Village Nande
Total Plot Area (sq. m.)
Total Plot Area: 1,64,900 Sq.mt.
Deductions: 44828.00 Sq.mt.
Net Plot area: 120072.00 Sq.mt.
Permissible FSI (including 0.9
TDR etc.)
Proposed Built-up Area FSI area (sq. m.)
78720.60
(FSI & Non-FSI)
Non FSI area (sq. m.):
65824.41
Total BUA area (sq. m.)

27.36 %
144545.01
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%) (Note:
Percentage of plot not open
to sky)
Estimated cost of the Rs. 537 Crores
project
Chairman
31
No. of building & its configuration(s)
Type of Project: Teaching Hospital, Medical College And Residential Facility.

No. of Buildings:
No. Of Floors
Ht. Of Bldg
College
G+5 Floors
22.05m
Teaching Hospital
600 Beds
G+6 Floors
29.95m
SSHRC, Speciality Hospital
300 Beds
G+7 Floors
29.85m
Animal House
G+1 Floors
7.65m
Services Block
B+1 Floors
4.05m
Nurses' Qtrs.
45 Qtrs.
G+4 Floors
14.95m
Teaching Doctors' Apartment
32 Flats
Stilt+4 Floors
14.95m
Services Apartments
48 Guest Rms
G+4 Floors
14.95m
Social Hub
G+1 Floor
6.00m
Boys' Hostel(2 Blocks)
100 Rooms
G+4 Floors
14.95m
Girls' Hostel(2 Blocks)
100 Rooms
G+4 Floors
14.95m
Interns' Hostel
30 Rooms
G+2 Floors
9.15m
Number
of
expected
residents / users
Right of way (Width of the
road)
Turning radius for easy
movement from all around
the building excluding the
width for the plantation
Total Water Requirement
Rain Water Harvesting

(RWH)
5278 Nos.
30 m wide external road, nearest fire station- Aundh gaon
6 m Minimum Driveways with additional 3.00 m radius and wider space
at turning.
There is no existing structure on site

Dry season:
Fresh water (CMD):843 & Source: Water Supply Department
Recycled water (CMD): 500
Total Water Requirement (CMD): 1069
Swimming pool make up (Cum): - Fire fighting (Cum): 200
Wet Season:
Fresh water (CMD): 566 & Source: Water Supply Department
Recycled water (CMD):500
Swimming pool make up (CMD):- Fire fighting (CMD):200
Level of the Ground water table: Geotechnical investigation has done
up to 8 mt. within the premises at different location. No water table
level was encountered in any of the borehole till 8 mt.
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity:-Location of the RWH tank(s):-Chairman
32
UGT tanks
Sewage and Waste water
Solid waste Management
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity: 9 nos. of RWH pits with silt
chamber
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Capital Cost :15 Rs.
Lakhs
O & M : 7 Lakhs/ Anum
Near Energy center and Hospital block
Natural water drainage pattern: Contoured land sloping from ES to NW.
quantity of storm water: Run off after development : 1071 m3/sec
Size of SWD
Sewage generation (CMD) : 566
STP technology: MBBR
Capacity of STP (CMD): 3 nos. of STP
1. Academic And Hospital : 450 M3
2. Residential: 170 M3
3. Animal house : 6 m3
Location of the STP: Academic And Hospital, Residential & Animal
house
DG sets (during emergency): consider in normal backup
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost):
Capital cost : 110 lakhs , O &M cost : 15 Lakhs/ Anum
Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction phase:
Waste generation :
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved:
Disposal of the construction way debris:
Dry waste (Kg/day): 2510
Wet waste (Kg/day): 1640
E waste (Kg/month): 500
Hazardous waste (Kg/month): - Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): 500
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day): 45
Waste from the kitchen will be taken into the STP after passing it
through grease trap. Effluent from the laundry is collected in a
sump and will be dosed with an antifoaming agent and also a
flocculent so that the quality of effluent is better than the house
hold waste.
Wet & Dry garbage from the kitchen & other areas will be
segregated at source level. Dry garbage will be further segregated
into recyclable & non-recyclable garbage. Recyclable dry
garbage will be sent to approve recycling agencies. Non
recyclable dry garbage will be handed over to municipality for
disposal at approved land fill sites. Wet garbage will be used at
site in organic waste converter to produce manure.
Biomedical waste will be taken separately and will be given to
hazardous waste collecting agencies or municipal authorities.
E-waste will also be taken separately and will be given to E waste
Chairman
33
Green Belt Development
Energy
recycling agencies.
Area requirement:
1. Location(s) and total area provided for the storage and treatment of the
solid waste:
Capital Cost : Rs. 50 Lakhs
O & M Cost : Rs. 5 Lakhs
Total RG area:
1. RG area other than green belt (Please specify for Playground,
etc.): Area for Playground 14180.00 Sq. mt.
2. RG area under green belt:
RG on the ground (m2.): 38597.00 Sq.mt (32.14 % of net Plot area )
RG on the podium (m2.): 3230 Sq. mt ( 2.69 % of net Plot area)
3. Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in the ground RG: 1503
nos.
Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be
transplanted: Existing trees: 500 nos.
NOC for the Tree cutting / transplantation/
compensatory plantation, if any
1. Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost)
Capital Cost : 2300 Lakhs & O & M Cost : 36.80 Lakhs/ Anum
Power supply:
Maximum demand: 55 00 KW
Connected load : 9700 KW
Source : MSEDCL
Energy saving measures
- Use of energy efficient water cooled screw chillers
-
Use of CFL / T5 lamps for lighting. Variable speed

secondary pumping
Maximum use of daylight
Variable speed air handling units.
Adherence to ECB code for energy conservation
Switching off lights through day light / occupancy sensor with
BMS control
Multiple circuits for lighting
Group control for elevators
Low loss capacitors
Transformers close to point of use to bring down low side
losses.
Use of solar energy for water heating to canteen.
Detail calculations & % of saving : 17 %
Chairman
34
Sr.N
o.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Percentage
Description
wise
Use of energy efficient water cooled screw
chillers
4
Use of CFL / T5 lamps for lighting. Variable
speed secondary pumping
2
Maximum use of daylight
5
Variable speed air handling units.
2
Adherence to ECB code for energy
conservation
Switching off lights through day light /
occupancy sensor with BMS control
1
Multiple circuits for lighting
Group control for elevators
1
Low loss capacitors
Transformers close to point of use to bring
down low side losses.
Use of solar energy for water heating to
canteen.
2
17
Traffic Management
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: (Yes / No) (If yes then submit
compliance in tabular form): Applying for Green building certification
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Capital cost : 18
Lakhs
O&M cost : 2 Lakhs/ annum
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used: 3No. of D.G. Set of
capacity 2000 kVA
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: We
have Proposed our Entry- Exits for Vehicles from -12m Wide Road
Parking details:
Total Parking area : 10800.65 Sq.mt
Area per car : 31.4 Sq. mt. (including drive way and ramp )
For Institute & Hospital
4 Wheelers: 305 Nos.
Wheelers: 245 Nos.
Ambulance: 6 Nos.
For Residential
Parking Proposed :
4 Wheelers: 64 Nos.
2 Wheelers: 108 Nos.
Cycles: 970 Nos.
Width of all Internal roads (m): 12 mt. , 8 mt. & 6 mt. wide
Chairman
35
Environmental
Construction phase: 21.5 Lakhs
Management
plan Operation phase:
Budgetary Allocation
O & M cost: 79.8 lakhs

Decision:
It is noted that PP has obtained NA permission only for part of the total plot area under
consideration. The PP informed that the revenue authorities had instructed them to obtain EC for
the entire project in order to obtain NA permission for the rest of the plot area. SEAC is of the
opinion that prior EC is not precondition for NA permission. Process of NA conversion involves
land use change and NA also prescribes the zoning and FSI applicability. Therefore, PP is advised
to phase the project on the basis of currently available NA plot or obtain NA permission for the
entire plot.
Detailed appraisal of the project will be done after the submission of the above said points.
Chairman
36
Item No. 7
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Residential Development at Sr.No
17/7, 22/2A, 17/6/1/ (1+2+3), 17/6/2.at Kharadi, Taluka Haveli, Dist: Pune by
M/s.Nyati Builders Pvt. Ltd.
(File No. SEAC 2211/ CR-982/ TC2) (New case)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Location of the
project
Type of Project
Category
CRZ/RRZ clearance
obtain ,if any
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other
area
Applicability of the
DCR
Note on the initiated
work
(If applicable)
LOI / NOC from
MHADA
/ Other approvals (If
applicable)
Total Plot Area (sq.
m.)Deductions
Net Plot area
Permissible FSI
(including
TDR etc.)
Proposed Built-up
Area
(FSI & Non-FSI)
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
(Note: Percentage of
Proposed Residential Development

M/s.Nyati Builders Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Ultra-Tech
Sr.No 17/7, 22/2A, 17/6/1/ (1+2+3), 17/6/2.at Kharadi, Taluka Haveli,
Dist:- Pune
8(a) B2
Distance from Mula Mutha river is 150meter from plot boundary.
RRZ NOC required.
Pune Municipal Corporation.
Pune Municipal Corporation Development Control Rule (DCR)

No work has been initiated.
N.A
Total Plot Area: 26524.31 Sq.mt.
Plot area +Amenity area + HDH

26524.31 Sq.mt.+ 2300 Sq.mt.+ 9775.18 Sq.mt.
= 38599.49
FSI
: 38546.48 Sq.mt.
Non FSI : 35929.82 Sq.mt.
Total
: 74476.3 Sq.mt.
Total Ground coverage is 12080 Sq.mt.: -45% of net plot area.
Rs.91.19 Cr.
Chairman
37
project
configuration(s)
Number of tenants
and shops
Number of expected
residents / users
Tenant density per
hector
Height of the
building(s)
Right of way (Width

of the road)
Turning radius for
easy access of fire
tender movement
from all around the
building excluding
the width for the
plantation
Details of the
demolition
with disposal (If
applicable)
Total Water
Requirement
Building
Type
No. of
Building
No. of
Floors
No. of
Tenements
per
Building
Total No. of
Tenements
A1
2P +15
59
59
B1
2P +15
59
59
C1 to C4
2P +15
59
236
D1
B + P+11
168
168
E1 (HDH)
P+11
166
166
Total
688
Total no. of Tenants :- 688

Number of expected residents :- 3440
265 Tenants per hector
Building Type
Height of Buildings
A1
47.30
B1
47.30
C1 to C4
47.30
D1
35.70
E1 (HDH)
34.80
Nearest Fire Station Yerwada Fire Station: & Width of
the road from the nearest fire station to the proposed building 30m. D.P road
abutting to site
Turning radius for easy access of fire tender movement from all around
the building is 9.75 m.
No existing structures.
No demolition work.
Dry season:
Fresh water (CMD): 318
Source: PMC/Tanker
Total Water Requirement (CMD): 487 (Including flushing &gardening)
Swimming pool make up (Cum): 8
Chairman
38
Rain Water
Harvesting
(RWH)
UGT tanks
Storm water
drainage
Sewage and Waste

water
Solid waste
Management
Fire fighting (Cum): 200 & 100

Wet Season:
Source: PMC
Swimming pool make up (CMD): 8
Fire fighting (CMD): 200 & 100
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity :- N.A
Level of the Ground water table: 3m to 7 m.
Size, no of recharge bore well and Quantity: - 6 Nos of 150 mm dia
Capital Cost :- Rs. 3.00 lacs
O & M cost :- Rs. 0.9 lacs/ annum
Locations of the UGT tanks : 1 UG tank is near B1 building
1 UG tank is near E1 building
Natural water drainage pattern: Slopping from South North
Flat land with minor contours with gradual slope of 1:150
Quantity of storm water : 382.09 m3/min
Size of SWD :- 300 to 450 mm wide X 300 to 1200 mm deep
Sewage generation : A1to D1 Buildings :-282 m3/day and E1 building
90m3/day
Capacity of STP (CMD):- A1to D1 Buildings 285 m3/day and E1
building 90 m3/day
STP technology : Fluidized Aerobic Bio-Reactor technology (FAB)
Location of the STP: STP (A to D1 buildings) near building D1 &
another STP is near E1 building.
DG sets (during emergency):- Load considered in the Common D.G.
Set
Capital Cost :- Rs.94.68 lacs
Waste generation : 37 Kg/Day
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: -1310 m3.
Quantity of the debris :- 590 m3
Disposal of the construction way debris: - This material shall be used for
back filling and leveling of the plot and remaining will be disposed to
authorized sites.
From buildings A1 to D1 (OWC)
Non-Biodegradable (Kg/day):- 599
Biodegradable (Kg/day): - 575
Chairman
39
From building E1 (Vermicoposting)

Non-Biodegradable (Kg/day):- 190
Biodegradable (Kg/day): - 183
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day):-50 approx. \
Dry waste:- handed over to authorized recyclers
Wet waste:- Organic Waste Converter & Vermicomposting
Hazardous waste:- authorized hazardous waste management
agencies
STP Sludge (Dry sludge):- used as manure
Area requirement:
Location of OWC: Near D1 building and total area provided for the
storage and treatment of the solid waste: 70 Sq.mt.
Location of Vermicomposting: Near E1building and total area

provided for the storage and treatment of the solid waste: 25 Sq.mt.

Capital Cost :- Rs. 7.00 lacs
Green Belt
Development
Energy

Total RG area: 3689.09 Sq.mt
RG area other than green belt
Hard scape Area: Deck area 201.61 Sq. mt.
Children Play area: 274.26 Sq. mt.
Other paved area: 867.57 Sq. mt.
Total: 1388.00 Sq. mt.
RG area under green belt: RG on the ground level (sq. m.) :2301.09Sq. mt.
Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in the ground RG: 334 Nos.
trees to be planted
Existing tree which area going to retained :- 5 nos.
Capital Cost: - Rs.16.5 lacs
Power Supply:
Maximum demand 2232.45 KVA
Connected Demand 2511.51 KW.
Source - MSEDCL
CFL & LED based lighting will be done in the common areas,
landscape areas, signages, Entry gates and boundary compound walls
etc.
Chairman
40
Solar lights will be provided for common amenities like Street

lighting, & Garden lighting.
Auto Timer Switches Will Be provided for Street lights, Garden lights,
Parking & staircase Lights & Other Common Area Lights, for saving
electrical energy.
Water Level Controllers With Timers will be Used for Water Pumps.
Solar Water Heating Systems Will Be Done For Bathrooms.
To create awareness to end consumer or flat owner, for using energy
efficient light fittings like CFL, T5 Lamps & LED Lights.
Annual Savings with energy efficient equipments is around 4 to 5 %
Details Calculation & % of saving
Savings
Proposed
Per Day
Annual
saving
Unit
Low power high efficiency T5

lights in common areas.
86.96
31740.4
KWH
Low power high efficiency

CFL lights for external and
roads.
40.32
14716.80
KWH
Energy Saving by Solar Water

heater .
3870
1161000
KWH
821.25
KWH
KWH
TOTAL Annual Savings in KWH
1208278.4
5
TOTAL Annual Savings in KVA
1342531.6
1
KVA
TOTAL Savings per day in KVA
3678.16
KVA
Design demand per day in KVA
66973.60
KVA
Demand per day in KVA, if above measures

were not proposed
70651.76
KVA
Energy Conservation
Measures
Public Area lighting on

dimmer control.
2.25
Percentage savings
5.2
Compliance of the ECBC guideline :

6.2.1 Solar water heating for minimum
Complies.
20% design capacity

Chairman
41
6.2.2
7.2
Equipment efficiency standards

Lighting controls occupancy sensors
7.2.1.4 Exterior lighting to be controlled by
Complies.
Complies.
Complies.
photo sensor or time switch

Interior lighting power to be with in
7.3
specified limits
Complies.
Exterior lighting power to be with in

7.4 specified limits
Maximum allowable power loss from
8.2.1.1 transformer
8.2.3 Power factor be maintained between
Complies.
Complies.
Complies.
0.95 and unity

8.2.4
Check metering
Power distribution system losses to
Complies.
8.2.5
be
Complies.
maintained less than 1%

Budgetary allocation( capital Cost & O& M Cost)
Capital Cost Rs. 123.lacks
O & M Cost - Rs. 2.46 Lacks. Per Annum.
Traffic Management
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used 4 Nos. Of 250 KVA
2 Nos. , 160 KVA 1 No. & 125 KVA 1 No. With Canopy.
Type of fuel used Diesel.
Traffic generated from this project will confluent on proposed 30 m wide
road.
SR.
DETAILS
4W
2W
CYCLES
NO.
1
A
B
2
A
B
3
A
Open
Covered
BASEMENT PARKING
84
168
Open
Covered
LOWER LVL. PARKING

70
313
108
350
354
500
Open
UPPER LVL.PARKING
70
313
354
Chairman
42
Covered
108
100
Total Parking
356
1160
1376
Width of all Internal roads (m): Width of all Internal roads is12 m wide.
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Construction phase: 6.5 lakhs

Operation Phase: Capital cost: 244.18 lakhs and O&M cost: 47.17
lakhs/annum
Decision:
The proposal is for the development of HDH plot with an area of 26524.31 m2, which is part of
79800 m2. However, subdivision of the HDH plot has not yet taken place. Therefore, PP is advised
to obtain the appropriate order regarding the subdivision of the plot from the competent authority.
The PP is directed to comply with the following observations:
1. Submit NOC from RRZ Authority, Environment Department, GoM, as the project site is
located at a distance of about 150 m from Mula-Mutha river.
2. Submit a detailed note on the order of HDH w.r.t. overall development of the plot and the
prescribed conditions thereof.
Detailed appraisal of the project will be done after the submission of the above said points.
Chairman
43
Item No. 8
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed project known as "Fussion" at village
Phanasgaon, Tal. Deogad, Dist. Sindhudurg by M/s. Rajiv P Kulkarni
(File No. SEAC 2211 / CR-945 / TC2) (New case)
The PP was absent.
Item No. 9
Subject: TOR for the proposed Ferro Alloys industrial project at Plot No B-99, MIDC
Butibori, Tal. Hingana, Dist. Nagpur by M/s. Tirupati Minerals & Metals
(File No. SEAC
/ CR / TC2) (TOR case)
The PP was absent.
Chairman
44
Item No. 10
Subject: TOR for the proposed industrial project at At Plot No. F-24, M.I.D.C., Gondia
Industrial Area, Village- Mundipar, Tahsil-Tumsar, District- Gondia by M/s
Vidhya Minerals & Processors
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
New Project / Expansion
in existing project/
Modernization/
Diversification in exiting
project
Activity schedule in the
EIA Notification
Area Details
Name of the Notified
Industrial area / MIDC
area
Estimated capital cost of
the Project (including
cost for land, building,
plant and machinery
separately)
Proposed mineral benefication industrial project

M/s Vidhya Minerals & Processors
MITCON Consultancy & Engineering Services Ltd
New Project
2(b)
Total plot area (sq. m.): 4200
Built up area (Sq. m.): 840
GONDIA MIDC Area
Particulars
Land
Land Development
Factory Building
Plant & Machinery
MSEB Deposits & Charges
Pre- Operative Expenses
Working Capital
Rs. In Lacs
0.00
0.00
3.00
15.00
0.53
0.22
6.25
Total 25
Location details of
the project :
Latitude
: 2002820.06N
Longitude : 8000802.33E
Location : At Plot No. F-24, M.I.D.C., Gondia Industrial Area,
Village- Mundipar, Tahsil-Tumsar, District- Gondia
Elevation above Mean Sea Level: 315 meter
Distance from Protected

Areas / Critically
Polluted
PP has submitted that there are no Protected areas / Critically

polluted areas / Eco-Sensitive areas/ inter-state boundaries within 10
Km radial area
Chairman
45
areas / Eco-sensitive
areas
/ inter-State boundaries
Raw materials
(including
process chemicals,
catalysts, & additives).
Production details
List of
raw
materials
to
be used
Physical
and
chemical
nature of
raw
material
Manganese
Ore
Lumps or 6000
fines
Name of Products,
By products and
Intermediate
Products
Main Products
1.Ferro Manganese
2. Manganese Oxide
3. Manganese Di-Oxide
By-Products
Intermediate
Products
Process details /
manufacturing details
(RWH)
Total Water
Requirement
Quantity
(tonnes/
year) full
productio
n
capacity
Source
of
materials
Means of
transportation
(Source to
storage
site) with
justification
Nearby
Mines
By Tarpaulin
covered truck
Existing
(T/Year)
Proposed
Total
activity
(T/Year)
(new/
modernization
/ expansion)
(T/Year)
0
0
0
720
3000
1200
720
3000
1200
Nil
Nil
Nil
The proposed project involves following processes

1. Jigging
2. Beneficiation
In the factory premises roof top area will be determined and
subsequently rain water harvesting potential will be calculated.
However detailed design and engineering of the RWH system will
be undertaken during implementation stage.
Total water requirement:
Fresh water (CMD): 7 & Source: MIDC
Use of the water:
Process (CMD): 2
Cooling water (CMD): NA
DM Water (CMD): NA
Dust Suppression (CMD): 2
Drinking (CMD): 0.8
Green belt (CMD): 1
Fire service (CMD): Nil
Chairman
46

Sewage generation and
treatment
Effluent characteristic
ETP details
Note on ETP technology
to be used
Disposal of the ETP
sludge (If applicable)
Atmospheric Emissions
(Flue gas characteristics
SPM, SO2, NOX, CO,
etc.)
Others (CMD): 0.2

Proper storm water drainage line will be provided to maintain the
natural flow of storm water
Amount of sewage generation (CMD) :0.6
Proposed treatment for the sewage : Septic tanks followed by Soak
Pits
Capacity of the STP (CMD) (If applicable): NA. As sewage
generation is negligible
NA as there is no effluent generation due to the proposed activity
Source
Qty
(TPM)
Process
50
(Tailings)
Form
(Sludge / Dry /
Slurry etc.)
Composition
Fines
MnO2
Solid waste generated in the form of tailings it is recycled in roasting

furnace during reduction process for production of Manganese Oxide
Sr. Pollutant
Source
Emission
Concentration
No.
of
rate
in flue gas
Emission
(kg/hr)
(g/sec)
1
2
3
SPM
SO2
NOX
Stack
Stack
Stack
CO
Stack
0.48
0.13
Nil
Nil
Concentration in flue gas will
be 100 mg/Nm3
NA
NA
Stack emission Details:

Plant
Section
& units
Stack
No.
Height
from
ground
level
(m)
Internal
Diameter
(Top)(m)
Emission
Rate
(kg /hr)
Temp.
of
Exhaus
t
Gases
(0C)
Roasting
Furnace
1st
30
0.2
0.48
120
Chairman
47
Ambient Air Quality

Data
Pollutant Permissible
Standard
g/m3
PM10
100
Details of Fuel to be
used:
Proposed
Conc.
(in g/m3)
18
PM2.5
60
SO2
80
10
NOX
80
12
Sr.
No
Fuel
Daily Consumption
(TPD/KLD)
Existing
Proposed
Energy

Details of Pollution
Control Systems:
Environmental
Management plan
Remarks
Due to proposed
activity there is
slightly increase in
pollution activity it
will be mitigate by
providing pollution
control equipments
such as wet scrubber
& dust suppression
method & by
developing green belt
around the factory and
within the premises
Calorific %
value
Ash
(Kcals
/kg)
Fire
--0.3 TPD 0.3
Wood
Source of fuel: Saw Mill
Mode of transportation of fuel to site: Tractor trolley
Power supply:
Proposed power requirement: 100 KW
Power supply from MIDC.
Green belt area (Sq. m.): 1260
Number and species of trees to be planted : 1000
Sr.
1
2
3
%
Sulphur
Trace
Proposed to be installed
Wet Scrubber
Septic tanks followed by Soak Pits
Acoustic Enclosures will be
provided
4
Solid Waste
-It will be recycled in the reduction
process
O&M cost (With break up): 25 Thousand
Air
Water
Noise
Existing
----
Chairman
48
Sr.
No.
Recurring Cost
per annum
(Rs Thousand)
10
4
2
5
1
2
3
4
Capital
Cost (Rs
Thousand)
55
10
5
15
Air Pollution Control

Water Pollution Control
Noise Pollution Control
Environment Monitoring
and Management
5
Reclamation
----borrow/mined area (If
applicable)
6
Occupational Health
2
5
7
Green Belt
2
10
8
Solid waste management --Total 25
100
No. The total capital cost of project is 25 Lakhs only. PP informs that
EIA Submitted (If yes
proposed project will not have any significant environmental impact
then submit the salient
w.r.t. pollution
features)
PP has submitted that there is no storage /use of
Storage of chemicals
(inflammable/explosive/h inflammable/explosive/hazardous/toxic substance in proposed project
azardous/toxic
substances)
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. The project is of a very small budget i.e. about 25
lakh and scale of operation is also low. PP stated thatas the project is located in MIDC, there is
likely to be a very minimal environmental impacts. The PP is directed to comply with the
following observations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Submit the plant layout with dimension, process flow sheet and other details.
Submit the proposed air pollution control measures.
Submit the details of ash disposal.
Submit a justification regading the categorization of the project under Category 2(b) of the
EIA Notification, as the process involves thermal treatment and furnace operations.
5. Submit revised Form-I and prefeasibility report as the submitted Form-I does not contain
adequate information.
Chairman
49
Item No. 11
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of industrial project
(Fluorinated Aromatic Chemicals) at L-5, L-9/1 & L-8, MIDC, Tarapur, Dist:
Thane by M/s. Aarti Industries Ltd.
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
New project/Expansion
in existing project /
Diversification in exiting
project
Type of project:
Total plot Area:
project :
Location details of
the project :
Expansion of industrial project (Fluorinated Aromatic

Chemicals)
M/s. Aarti Industries Ltd
M/s Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Expansion in existing project (Fluorinated Aromatic Chemicals)
5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry

7557 m2
Existing : 2.25 Crores
Proposed : 8.04 Crores
Total : 10.29 Crores
EMP: 2.84 Crores
Latitude: 19 47 27.01 N
Longitude: 72 43 27.90 E
Location: Plot No. L-5,L-9/1, L-8, MIDC Industrial Area, Tarapur,
Boisar, Dist. Thane, Maharashtra
Elevation above sea level : 51 ft above Mean Sea Level
The existing industry is situated in notified MIDC.
Distance from Protected

Areas / Critically
Polluted areas / Ecosensitive areas
/ inter-State boundaries
Raw materials (including process chemicals, catalysts, & additives) :
Sr
Raw Material
Storage
Quantity
1.
Potassium carbonate
190
60% dilute HF
90
Vessel
made up
of
Storage
in bags
Storage
in HDPE
-carboy
No of
vessels
Capacity
50 mt
Type
Hazard
of
Class
Hazard
-
25 mt
R/C
Chairman
50
3
4
5
6
Para nitro chloro benzene

Ortho nitro chloro benzene
2,4 di chloro nitro benzene
2,4 di nitro chloro benzene
250
100
210
120
10
MS
MS
MS
SS316
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
MS
2,3 dichloro nitro benzene
115
10 Sulfolane
20
MS
11 Dimethyl sulfoxide
12 Mono chlorobenzene
15
20
1
1
13 PEG-400
1.0 MT
14 Caustic flakes
2 MT
T/C
15 2,3,5 trichloro pyridine
120
MS
MS
Storage
in HDPE
drum
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
Material
in bags
6 KL
12 KL
EACH
10 KL
10 KL
T/C
15 MT
8
9
2,4,5 trichloro nitro

benzene.
Nitrobenzene
75
2,3,4 trichloro
nitrobenzene
2,3,4,5 tetra chloro
17
nitrobenzene.
16
150
75
18 2,6- Dichloro benzonitrile
260
19 2,6-Difluorobenzonoitrile
100
1,3-Dimethyl-5-chloro-420 pyrazolyl carboxylic acid

chloride
120
21 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
22 Crude CFA
23
Crude 1,3 Difluoro

benzene
27 TMAC
Production details
1
1
1
1
21 KL
17 KL
17 KL
11 KL
T
T
T
20 MT
15 MT
3(6.1)
3
-
3(6.1)
&8
3(6.1)
&8
3(6.1)
3(6.1)
3(6.1)
--
Material
in bags
Storage
30
in HDPE carboy.
Storage
55
in HDPE drum
Storage
01
in fibre
drum
Existing Products:
Sr.No.
Name of Product
55
3(6.1)
3(6.1)
3(6.1)
-
3(6.1)
-
10 MT
MT
2,4 Di chloro fluoro benzene ( 2,4
Existing Qty
MT/Month
-----
Chairman
51
DCFB )
2
Meta di chloro benzene ( MDCB )
3
1,3 Dichloro 2- fluoro benzene ( 2,6
DCFB )
Total
Proposed Products:
Sr.No.
Name of Product
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Water Budget
----------35
Proposed Qty
MT/Month
200
75
150
100
75
50
25
50
50
Para fluoro nitro benzene

Ortho fluoro notro benzene
2,4 di fluoro nitro benzene
2,4 di nitro fluoro benzene
2,3 fluoro chloro nitro benzene
2,3,4 tri fluoro nitrobenzene
2,3 difluoro 5-chloro pyridine
2,4 di fluoro 5- chloro nitro benzene.
2, 4 di fluoro 3, 5 dichloro
nitrobenzene.
10
2,6-Difluoro benzonitrile
200
11
2,6-Difluoro benzamide
100
12
1,3-Dimethyl-5-chloro -4-pyrazolyl
100
carboxylic acid fluoride
13
2,6-Difluoro chlorobenzene
50
14
2,3-Difluoro chlorobenzene
50
15
2,3-Dichloro fluorobenzene
50
16
2, 6 Dichloro fluoro benzene.
50
17
3-chloro,4fluoro aniline
25
18
1,3 difluoro benzene
50
19
Ortho Difluoro benzene
50
20
3,5 Dichloro- 4 Fluoro nitrobenzene
25
21
Potassium fluoride
150
22
Technical salt ( KCL ) - Byproduct
225
Note: Total production capacity per month is 250MT for any one
product or for combination of all Products from No 1 to 20 as per
above list.
Total water Requirement: Existing = 35 m3/day Proposed = 65
m3/day
Fresh water (CMD):100 & Source: MIDC, Tarapur
Recycled water (CMD): Nil
Use of Water:
Process (CMD): Nil
Cooling Water (CMD): 67.5
Dust Suppression (CMD): Nil
Drinking (CMD): 5.0
Green Belt(CMD): 2.5
Fire Service (CMD):Nil
Chairman
52
Sewage and Waste

water
Storm Water Drainage
Sewage Generation &

Treatment
Effluent Characteristics
ETP Details
Note on ETP technology

to be used
Others (CMD):Industrial: 25
Amount of sewage generation (CMD): Total Sewage Generation: 4.5
m3/day
Proposed treatment for the sewage : Soak pits and septic tanks
Capacity of STP (CMD) if applicable: N.A.
Natural water drainage pattern: MIDC Drains
Quantity of storm water: N.A.
Size of SWD:N.A.
m3/day
Sr.No. Parameters Unit Inlet
Outlet
Permissible
Limits
1
PH
7.09
6.75
5.5-9.0
2
TSS
mg/l 247.0
209.0
100mg/l
3
COD
mg/l 1320.2
105.6
<250 mg/l
4
Oil &
mg/l 37.0
20.0
10 mg/l
Grease
5
BOD
mg/l 399.6
42.0
<100 mg/l
6
TDS
mg/l 567.4
440.1
2100 mg/l
Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Total Industrial
Effluent: 20 m3/day
Capacity of the ETP: Existing ETP capacity 50 m3/day
Amount of treated effluent recycled (CMD): N.A
Amount of water send to the CETP(CMD): CETP,Tarapur
Membership of the CETP (if require): if yes then attach the
letter submit the letter : Yes
Effluent from the factory will be collected in the Collection
tank by gravity drains. The Collection tank has aeration grids
provided for the proper mixing of the waste water.
From this chamber effluent will enter into Oil & Grease Trap
where oil will be separated from the effluent.
Oil free effluent will be then collected in to primary tank.
From Primary tank effluent will be taken into Neutralization
Chamber of 7.5 m3 capacity where pH of the effluent will be
check. If pH of the effluent is alkaline then HCl will be added
in the effluent for neutralization. If pH of the effluent is acidic
then NaOH will be added in the effluent for neutralization.
Alum will be added into the effluent for coagulation of
suspended solids which will lead in the formation of flock in
the effluent.
This effluent will be then taken into Primary Settling tank for
Sludge Settling.
Settled Sludge in the Primary Settling tank and Secondary
settling tank will be removed & sent to Press Filter. Filtrate of
Chairman
53
Solid waste generation &

disposal
Filter press will enter into Primary Settling tank.

Dewatered sludge cake will be then sent to Mumbai Waste
Management Ltd.
Clear overflow will go to bio-aeration tank. There it converts
the organic compounds into minerals & water, consequently
reducing BOD & COD of the effluent.
Overflow of the Secondary Settling tank will be filtered using
Pressure Sand Filter & Activated Carbon Filter.
Filtered water will be then let out into CETP drains.
The quantity of wastewater to be treated is 20.0 KLD.
Sr Source
Existing Proposed Total
Disposal
Quantity Quantity Quantity
Kg/day
Kg/day
(Kg/day)
1 Domestic 3.9
Nil
3.9
Vermicomposting
2
Gardening 7.12
2.25
Total
9.37
Vermicomposting
13.3
=412.3
Kg/M
Say =
0.41
MT/M
Hazardous waste genertion & disposal :

Sr Type of
Existing
Hazardous Waste Quantity
/Annum
1 ETP Sludge
0.6 MT
Additional
Quantity /
Annum
--
Total
Quantity
/Annum
0.6 MT
Process Residue
129 MT
150 MT
Empty
100 Nos
containers/Drums
700 Nos
800 Nos
Gloves
300
Nos.
60 Nos.
360 Nos
Ash Generation
274 MT
263 MT
537 MT
6.
Waste Oil
60 kgs
40 kgs
100 kgs
21 MT
Hazardous Storage &

waste
Disposal
Category
34.3
Collection,
Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
20.3
Collection,Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
33.3
Collection,Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
Collection,Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
36.2
Collection,Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
5.2
Collection,Storage
Transporation &
Disposal to TSDF
Chairman
54
Atmospheric Emmissions
SPM, SO2, NOx, CO, etc)
Stack Emission Details:
Emission Standard
Ambient Air Quality

Data
Sr Pollutant
Source of
Emission
Emission
Concentration
rate
in flue gas
(kg/hr)
(g/m3)
1 SPM
Combined Stack
1.51
0.288
2 SO2
Combined Stack
12.31
0.020
3 NOx
Combined Stack
0.49
0.392
4 CO
Combined Stack
0.11
138
Plant
Stack Height
Internal
Emission Temp.
Section &
No.
from
Diameter Rate (g/s) of
units
ground (Top) (m)
Exhaust
level
Gases
(m)
Thermopac 1
26
0.61
Sox- 0.79 145oC
Nox0.76
SPM3.41
Boiler
1
17
0.41
Sox-1.88 148oC
Nox0.0198
SPM1.016
Hot Air
1
17
0.2
Sox-0.85 145oC
Generator
Nox0.079
SPM0.0079
DG Set
1
7.5
0.2
Sox116oC
0.375
Nox0.053
SPM0.0053
Pollutants
Emission
Proposed
MPCB
(SPM,SO2,
Standard
Limit
Consent
etc)
Limit
(mg/Nm3)
(mg/Nm3)
(mg/Nm3)
SPM
60 g/m3
-150
SO2
80 g/m3
-43.2 kg/day
NOx
80 g/m3
-Not Specified
Cl2
2 mg/m3
-03
Pollutant
Permissible
Proposed
Remarks
Standard
Concentration
(in g/m3)
SPM
60 g/m3
66.6
APC will be
provided
Chairman
55
Details of Fuel used:

Source of Fuel :
Mode of
Transportation of
fuel to site
Details of pollution
control system
Energy
RPM
SO2
NOx
CO
S.
No.
1
-80 g/m3
80 g/m3
2 mg/m3
-12.8
27.5
1.24
Type of Fuel
Existing
Within Limit
Within Limit
Within Limit
Within Limit
Proposed
Total
Boiler (2TPH) 105 Lit/hr 15 Lit/hr 120 Lit/hr

DG Set (250 80 Lit/hr
2
--80 Lit/hr
KVA))
Thermo Pac
2400
100
2500
3
(8 lakh kcal)
kg/day
kg/day
kg/day
Air Pollution Control System : 03 Nos of Scrubber will be
provided
Water Pollution Control System :Sewage generated will be
treated in Septic tanks & Soak pits & treated sewage will be
used for green belt area.
Effluent Treatment Plant for treatment of industrial effluent
generated.
Noise Pollution Control System :
Use of Acoustic Enclosures
Predictive maintenance of fans, blowers, compressors & other
machineries.
Source: MSEB.
Existing: 400 KVA Proposed: 400 KVA
The maximum demand of power is 800 KVA required
Existing: 1 DG Sets of 250 KVA
Proposed: Nil
Existing Green Belt Area: 1900 sq.m
Proposed Green Belt Area: 600 sq.m
Number & Species existed: 30 Nos.
Sr. No. NAME
NUMBER
1
Ficus religiosa (linn.) Pipal
10
2
Azadirachta indica (A. Jass) Neem 10
Tree
3
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Polyalthia Longifolia Ashoka

10
Total
30
Number, Size, Age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be
transplanted: N.A.
Description
Recurring Cost per
Capital Cost
Annum (lakhs)
(lakhs)
1.0
10
Water Pollution Control 1.0
10
Noise Pollution
-1.0
Control
Environmental
2.0
2.0
Chairman
56
EIA details
Monitoring &
Management
Occupational Health
5.0
10
Green Belt
50.0
1.0
Solid Waste
-250
Management
Others
---Total
9.50
284
Yes
Period of data collected: March-May 2011
Details of the primary Data Collection (i.e. location of sample
collection, number of visit etc): Project Site, Boisar Railway Station,
Saravali Village,Kolwade village,Boisar Tarapur Road, Pam Village
4-5 visits
Details of the Secondary Data Collection (i.e. source & year of data)Year 2011.
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. The Committee noted that the EIA report
submitted contained many inconsistencies and errors. The Consultant/ PP shall ensure that the
revised EIA Report, which is in the revision of the earlier version, is free from inconsistencies and
errors. The figures in the EIA report are without any titles or references in the text. Therefore, the
Committee could not assess the EIA report properly. It was also noted that the plant layout
submitted was a sketch rather than an engineering drawing. The Consultant has already been
warned a few times to take care of such mistakes as such practices waste time of the entire
committee. The PP is directed to comply with the following observations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Submit engineering drawings of existing and proposed plant layout.

Revise the EIA report by including common flora and domesticated fauna.
Consent for water supply from MIDC.
NOC to accept treated wastewater by CETP.
NOC to accept the additional hazardous waste by CHWTSDF.
Use of septic tank and soak pit shall be avoided for the domestic effluent. Treated
domestic effluent shall be connected to the MIDCs domestic sewage line.
7. Submit existing and proposed Green Belt development details. Total 600 trees may be
planted based on the total green belt development plan.
Chairman
57
Item No. 12
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Organic Chemical Unit at plot No. K-22,
MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur by M/s. Aahi Chemicals
(File No. SEAC 2011/CR-824/TC-2)
Name of the
Project
Project
Proponent
Consultant
New
Project/
Expansion
in
existing project/
diversification in
exiting project
Area Details
M/s. Aahi Chemicals, Proposed Organic Chemical Unit

Mr. Tushar Garg, M/s. Aahi Chemicals, Plot No. K-22, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur.
M/s. Enviro Analyst & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
New Project
Total plot area (sq.m.): 2292.5

Built up area (sq.m.): 604.532
the Butibori MIDC, Nagpur
Name of
Notified
Industrial area/
MIDC area
Estimated cost of
the project : (Pl
quote estimation
clearly specifying
cost for land,
building,
plant
and machinery
separately)
Location details
of
the project :
2.92 Crores
Latitude: 20 5619.46N
Longitude: 78 5815.08E
Location: Plot No. K-22, MIDC Butibori, Nagpur.
Distance
from The Proposed industry will plan in notified MIDC Butibori.
There are three Reserved Forest as given below:
protected
Bidsekli 5-6 kms
areas/Critically
polluted area/Eco Junpani- 8-9 kms
Dongargaon-5-6kms
sensitive
areas/Inter State
boundaries
Chairman
58
Raw
Materials
(including
process
chemicals,
catalysts
&
additives)
List of Raw
Materials to
be Used
Methanol
Water
Silver
Catalyst
Production
Details
Rain
Water
Harvesting
(RWH)
Quantity
(tones/year)
full
production
capacity
Source of materials
9000
MT/Annum
12410
m3/Annum
120
Kg/Annum
Name of
Products,
Byproducts
and
Intermediate
Products
Formaldehyde
Sr Description
G.N.F.C. Gujrat,
R.C.F. Mumbai, etc.
M.I.D.C. Butibori
Proposed
(T/year)
Means of
transportation
(Source to
storage site)
with
justification
By Road
Tankers
Through pipe
line
By Road
Arora mahhey Ltd.

Kolkatta, Maruti
Gujarat.
Proposed activity (new/
modernization/expansion)
18000 MT/A
2
Area m
*Co-
New Activity
Max. Rain
Total
(T/Year)
18000 MT/A
Volume
(m3/Day)
Terrace Area
Road &
575.63
0.90
0.2 (July/ Aug)
103.61
890.21
0.80
0.2 (July/ Aug)
142.43
Green Belt Area
756.52
0.80
Total
2,222.36
Open spaces
3
0.2 (July/ Aug)
121.04
367.08
Level of Ground Water Table : - Size and no of RWH tanks and Quantity :- Location of the RWH tanks : - Size nos. Of recharge pits and Quantity : 01 No. (1m X 1m X 1m)
Budgetory Allocation Capital cost :1.0 lac and O&m cost: 40,000
Total
Water Total water Requirement:
Requirement
Fresh water (CMD): 34.0 & Source: MIDC, Butibori
Use of Water:
Process (CMD): 17
Cooling Water (CMD): 15
Chairman
59
Storm
Water
Drainage
Sewage
Generation
Treatment
&
Effluent
Characteristics
ETP Details
Atmospheric
Emissions (Flue
gas
characteristics
SPM, SO2, NOx,
CO, etc)
Stack Emission
Details:
Ambient
Air
Quality Data
Details of Fuel
used:
Source of Fuel :
Mode
of
Transportation
of fuel to site
Drinking (CMD): 1.0

Green Belt(CMD):1.0
Others (CMD):Nil
Natural water drainage pattern: MIDC Drains
Quantity of storm water: NA
Size of SWD: NA
Amount of sewage generation (CMD): 0.75

Proposed treatment for the sewage : Soak pits & Septic tanks
No industrial effluent generation

Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Nil
Capacity of the ETP: N.A.
Amount of water send to the CETP(CMD): N.A
Membership of the CETP (if require): if yes then attach the letter submit the
letter : N.A.
Sr.No.
Pollutant
Source of
Emission rate
Concentration in
Emission
(kg/hr)
flue gas (g/m3)
1
SPM
Boiler
0.005184
0.000066
2
SO2
Boiler
0.000360
0.000016
3
NOx
Boiler
0.007056
0.000017
4
CO
Boiler
0.008640
0.000278
5
Others
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
Plant
Stack No.
Height
Internal
Emission
Temp. of
Section &
from
Diameter
Rate
Exhaust
units
ground
(Top) (m)
Gases
level (m)
Boiler
1
15
250 mm
-150oC
Pollutant
Permissible
Proposed
Remarks
Standard
Concentration
(in g/m3)
SPM
60 g/m3
0.288
Within Limit
RPM
---SO2
80 g/m3
0.022
Within Limit
NOx
80 g/m3
0.436
Within Limit
CO
2 mg/m3
0.483
Within Limit
Calorific
Value
S. No. Type of Fuel
Proposed
(Kcal/gms)
% Ash
% Sulphur
Chairman
60
Biomass i.e.
Peanut shell
with binder
(Boiler)
Diesel (DG set) 400 Lit/week
0.75 T/M
3800 -4200 k
cal/kg
8%
Power Supply
Existing Power Requirement: N.A.
Proposed Power Requirement: 221 HP
DG Sets
Number and capacity DG sets to be used (proposed): Proposed 01 No. of DG set
capacity 200 KVA will be used as back up for emergency
Details of Non-Conventional renewable energy proposed to be used:
All internal common area are proposed to work on high energy efficient lamps (CFL).
Green
Belt Green Belt Area: 756.52 sq.m
Number & Species to be planted: 38 Nos.
Development
Sr. No. NAME
NUMBER
1
Ficus religiosa
05
2
Azadirachta indica
10
3
Melia azadiracta
12
4
Delonix regia
06
5
Peltophorum pterocarpum
05
Total
38
Number, Size, Age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be transplanted: Nil
Energy
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed.
The Committee noted that the plant layout submitted was a sketch rather than an engineering
drawing. The meteorological data presented during the appraisal and mentioned in the EIA report
are erronous. The presentation shall be corrected accordingly and such mistakes shall be avoided
in future as the Consultant is already warned in the past on such issues.
1. Submit engineering drawings of existing and proposed plant layout.
2. Details of Rain Water Harvesting system supported by geotechnical data and large scale
drawing.
3. Use of septic tank and soak pit shall be avoided for domestic effluent. Treated domestic
effluent shall be connected to the MIDCs domestic sewage line.
4. Plant 75 trees in the Green Belt area as communicated in the presentation.
Chairman
61
Item No.: 13
Subject:
Environmental clearance for Setting up Prozone Liberty (earlier called Nagpur

Festival City) at village Chinchbhuwan, District Nagpur by M/s. Hagwood
Commercial Developers Pvt. Ltd.
(File No.: SEAC 2010/CR.421/TC.2)

The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee
noted project details furnished by the Project Proponent as:
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Category
Whether in Corporation /
Permissible FSI (including TDR

etc.)
Proposed Built-up Area (FSI &
Non-FSI)
Ground-coverage Percentage (%)
Estimated cost of the project
configuration(s)
Number of tenants and shops
Number of expected residents /
users
Tenant density per hector
Height of the building(s)
Right of way (Width of the road)
Turning radius for easy access of
fire tender movement from all
around the building excluding the
Prozone Liberty (earlier called Nagpur Festival City)

M/s Hagwood Commercial Developers Pvt. Ltd
Pollution and Ecology Control Services
The site is located at S. No. 25, 29,30, Mouza Chinchabuvan,
Nagpur, Maharashtra
8(a) B2
Nagpur Municipal Corporation
Total Plot Area: 73,417.86 sq. m (Phase-I)
Deductions: 14,683.57 sq. m
Net Plot area: 58,734.29 sq. m .
2.0
FSI area (sq. m.)
64792.00 sq .m
55,450.58 sq. m
1,20,242.58 sq.m
26.32 %
Rs 231 Cr
6 Nos: B + ST + 14 upper Floor
Tenements : 616 Nos
3080 Nos
85/ha
48.0 m
30.00 m
9.0 m
Dry season:
& Source: NMC
Chairman
62
Rain Water Harvesting (RWH)
UGT tanks

Fire fighting (Cum):05
Wet Season:
& Source: NMC
Total Water Requirement (CMD): 475 CMD
Fire fighting (CMD):05
Level of the Ground water table : 10-12 m
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity : 2 No 50 cum
each
Location of the RWH tank(s) : Basement
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity : 04No; Size (3 x 3 x
3) m
Basement
Natural water drainage pattern : Yes
Quantity of storm water : 26 cum/hr
Size of SWD : 600 x 800 m
STP technology : MBBR
Capacity of STP (CMD) 350
Location of the STP : Ground
DG sets (during emergency) : Yes
Waste generation in the Pre Construction and
Construction phase:
Waste generation : 1-2 MT/day
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: approx 2.0 MT
Disposal of the construction way debris: Low lying area of
site/NMC approved site
Hazardous waste (Kg/month): 6.0
Dry waste: Segregated/Sale/Collected by local authority
Wet waste: Composting through OWC & used at site/
handed over to local as manure
Hazardous waste: MPCB authorized vendor
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Manure
Area requirement: Ground (55.83 sq. m)
Total RG area: 11,012.68 sq. m
RG area under green belt: RG on the ground (sq. m.)
:11,012.68
Plantation: List of trees species to be planted in the
ground RG:
Chairman
63
Tree
Common Name
Bahava
Bakul
Parijatak
Energy
Traffic Management
Environmental Management plan

Scientific name
Cassia fistula
Mimusops elengi
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis
Lagerstroemia flosTamhan
regineae
Kunti
Murraya paniculata
Sita Ashok
Saraca asoka
Shivan
Gmelina arborea
Apta
Bauhinia racemosa
Neem
Azadirachta indica
Kate sawar
Bombax ceiba
Pangara
Erythrina indica
Palas / Flame of the forest Butea monosperma
Fish tail palm
Caryota urens
Power supply:
Maximum demand : 4500 KVA
Connected load : 11100 KVA
Source : MSEDCL
Light fixtures will be used with energy saving CFL & T5
fluorescent tube with electronic chocks.
Use of Solar energy for street & landscape lightings.
Small capacity transformers having low no load and load
losses.
Selection of Energy efficient equipments (BEE STAR
RATED
Detail calculations & % of saving : 12 %
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence
: two
Parking details:
Number and area of basement : 01
Area per car 27.50 sq. m
2-Wheelar : 500
4-Wheeler :1067 No
Width of all Internal roads (m): 6.0 & 9.0 m
Construction phase: Capital Cost: 5 lakhs and O&M cost: 1.10
lakhs
Operation phase: Capital Cost: 89 lakhs and O&M cost: 15 lakhs
Decision:
Chairman
64
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. The proposal is for residential project as Phase-I in
a commercial zone with plot area of 73,417.86 m2.
It was noted that the project partially falls in the flying funnel of the airport and is located
about 1.5 km from the airport. However, the PP has received permission for 48 m building height
from the Airport authority.
1. PP is considering an FSI of 2 interpreting the statement N-2.7 (C) from NMC-DCR. This
FSI is applicable for a mixed project of residential and commercial. However, Phase-I is
only for residential. Therefore, the applicability of assumed FSI may be questionable. PP
may get a clarification on this matter from a competent authority.
2. Submit an undertaking to construt the proposed DP roads of 18 m and 30 m width on their
own cost. In case these are not constructed by planning authorities within the scheduled time
scale. If not EC will not be issued until DP roads are constructed.
3. Submit an undertaking to provide adequate RG for the planned commercial project in PhaseII as the PP has already provided full RG in the present residential project.
4. Submit the consent for water supply from a competent authority indicating the required
quantity.
5. PP has proposed a pond for storing 5 million ltr treated wastewater during rainy season.
However, considering the safety and water quality aspects, it is desirable to dispense off the
provision of pond and PP is advised to construct a sewage line up to the existing municipal
sewage line. Details of the same shall be submitted.
6. Relocate the UG tank for domestic water away from the UG tank for treated waste water /
flushing water.
7. Submit RWH calculations withhydrogeological and geotechnical details.
8. Provide cutouts in the building length for ease of fire engine movement. The obstructions
coming in fire tender movement such as STP, Power house shall be shifted suitably.
9. Submit details of compliance to ECBC / BEE guidelines.
10. Submit the ventilation and lightening scheme for the basements.
11. Superstructure staircase shall not be directly taken into basements.
12. Refuge area shall be strategically located so as to be accessable to all tenements.
13. Septic tank and soak pit to club house shall be avoided and the wastewater shall be treated in
the STP proposed.
14. Submit details of car parking proposed.
15. Total 550 nos of trees to be planted along periphery of plot as well as in the central
landscaping area.
16. Submit the consent for water supply from a competent authority.
Chairman
65
Item No. 14
Subject: Environmental clearance for Residential Project at Sr. No.97 at Borhatewadi,
Village Moshi, Pune, Maharashtra by M/s. Kumar Company
(File No. SEAC-2011/CR-979/TC-2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Category
Location of the Project
Whether in Corporation/
Municipal/other area
Applicability of the DCR
Total Plot Area
Deductions
Net Plot area
Net Permissible FSI
Proposed Built up area
(FSI & Non FSI)
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
project
No. of buildings & its
configurations

shops
Number of expected
residents / users
Height of the building
road from the nearest fire
Residential Project by M/s. Kumar Company

M/s. Kumar Company
M/S. Saitech Research & Development Organization In
association With M/s. SMS Envocare Ltd.
Sr. No.97 at Borhatewadi, Village Moshi, Pune, Maharashtra
8(a) B2
Sr. No.97 at Borhatewadi, Village Moshi, Pune, Maharashtra.
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation [PCMC]
Yes, As per PCMC DCR
21900 m2
1142.21 m2
20757.79 m2
30533.25 m2
FSI area
Non FSI area
Total BUA area
34 %
29390.26 m2
24548.39 m2
53938.65m2
Rs. 57 Crores (Approx)

Residential: - Total Nos. of Buildings = 9 nos.
( A1, A2, B1 to B5, C1 & C2) : P + 12 Floors
Commercial: Total Nos. of Buildings = 2 nos.
Convenient Shopping 1 & 2 : Ground
Total Shops: 15 Nos.
Residential Population: 2080 persons
Commercial Population : 45 Persons
Total Population: 2125 persons
190 per hector
39.45 m
Two adjacent to side DP road 24 m wide and 18 M Wide
Chairman
66
station to the proposed

building(s))
Existing structure
Details of the demolition
with disposal (If applicable)

(RWH)

9.0 m
No existing structure present on proposed site

No , The project does not involve any demolition work
Dry season:
Source: Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation [PCMC]
Fresh water
: 209 m3/day
Recycled water (Flushing)
: 74 m3/day
Recycled water (Gardening) : 29 m3/day
Total Water Requirement : 312 m3/day
Swimming pool make up
: NA
Fire fighting
: 200 m3
Excess treated water
: 166 m3/day
Wet Season:
Source : Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation [PCMC]
Fresh water
: 209 m3/day
Recycled water (Flushing)
: 74 m3/day
Recycled water (Gardening) : Nil
: NA
Fire fighting
: 200 m3
: 195 m3/day
Level of the Ground water table : 3 m
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity :
Size of the recharge pit = 2 m x 2 m x 0.9 m
Capital Cost: 3.5 Lakhs
O & M Cost per Annum: 0.15 Lakhs
Size of SWD: Appropriate size of storm water drainage
channels will be provided.
STP technology : -FAB
Location of the STP : Ground
DG sets (during emergency) : 1 X 320 KVA
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost) :
Capital Cost: Rs. 75 Lakhs
O & M Cost per Annum: Rs. 10 Lakhs
Waste generation in the Pre Construction & Construction
phase:
Chairman
67

Disposal of the construction way debris: Construction debris,
Waste concrete and broken bricks will be utilized in low-land
leveling, secondary concrete, below roads. Some quantity of
Excavation soil will be use for backfilling and remaining will
be hand over to authorized vendor.
Hazardous waste: spent oil or oil grease for DG sets paints
etc.
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : 4.5 kg/day
Dry waste : Handed over to authorized recycler for further
handling and disposal
Wet waste: Will be converted to compost using Organic
Waste Processor [OWP] model no. EPL 500
E waste : Handed over to authorized Vendor
Hazardous waste : Handed over to authorized Vendor
Biomedical waste (If applicable) : Not Applicable
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : Will be used as manure for
gardening
Area requirement:
1. Location(s) : On Ground
2. Total area provided for the storage & Treatment of the
solid waste : For EPL 500 - 100 m2
O & M Cost: 3 Lakhs/Annum
RG on the ground : 2358.02 m2
RG on the podium: 2577.44 m2
Plantation:
List of Proposed Trees on Ground:
Sr.
Name
C/C Dist Quantity
No.
1
Alistonea scholaris
4 m C/C
43 nos.
2
Bauhinia purpurea
5 m C/C
04 nos.
3
Mimosops elengii
4 m C/C
04 nos.
(Bakul)
4
Anthocephalus
4 m C/C
10 nos.
kadamba
5
Nycanthes
3.5 m C/C 31 nos.
arbortristics
(Parijatak)
6
Michelia champaka
3.5 m C/C 08 nos.
Chairman
68
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Total
Lagerstroemia flos
regina
Dillenia indica
Azardirachta indica
(Neem)
Plumeria alba
Millingtonea
hortensis
Putranjiva
Cassia fistula
5 m C/C
02 nos.
4 m C/C
5 m C/C
18 nos.
26 nos.
3 m C/C
3 m C/C
42 nos.
10 nos.
4 m C/C
5 m C/C
22 nos.
07 Nos.
227 Nos.
List of proposed Shrubs on Ground:

Sr.
No.
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Name
Hymenocallis
littoralis (Spider
Lily)
Tabernaemontana
coronaria (Tagar
Variegated)
Hedychium
coronarium
(Sontakka)
Plumbago capensis
Nerium oleander
single pink
Nerium oleander red
Nerium oleander
dwarf
Hibiscus red
Ixora red hybrid
Allamanda dwarf
Cestrum nocturnum
(Raatrani)
Tabernaemontana
coronaria single
(Tagar)
Caesalpinea
pulcherrima
Thevetia
Wadelia trilobata
C/C
Distance
0.3 m C/C
Area m2
0.45m C/C
56.4
0.45 m C/C
48.5
0.45 m C/C
0.45 m C/C
146.23
59
0.45 m C/C
0.45 m C/C
20.34
152.19
0.45 m C/C
0.45 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
0.45 m C/C
65
52.8
44.42
29.16
0.45 m C/C
45.13
0.75 m C/C
55.3
0.6 m C/C
0.23 m /C
20.3
20.3
471.75
List of proposed Shrubs on Podium:
Chairman
69
Sr.
No.
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Name
Hymenocallis
littoralis (Spider
Lily)
Tabernaemontana
coronaria (Tagar
Variegated)
Hedychium
coronarium
(Sontakka)
Plumbago capensis
Nerium oleander
dwarf
Nerium oleander
single red
Tecoma capensis
Tecoma gaudi chaudi
Golden bamboo
Jasminum sambac
motia (Mogra)
Myena erecta
Plumera pudica
Gardenia
jasminoides (Kunda)
Lantana red
Allamanda dwarf
Ocinum sanctum
(Tulsi)
Hibiscus red
Tabernaemontana
coronaria (Tagar
Single)
Aloevera
Thevetia
Crossandra (Aboli)
C/C
Distance
0.3 m C/C
Area m2
0.45m C/C
53
0.45m C/C
8.3
0.45m C/C
0.45m C/C
251.26
25
0.45m C/C
21.5
0.45m C/C
0.45 m C/C
2 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
81.71
18.3
9.75
68.47
0.45 m C/C
2 m C/C
0.45 m C/C
27
20.45
99.41
0.3 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
17.7
10.1
7.3
0.45 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
15
11.8
0.3 m C/C
0.6 m C/C
0.3 m C/C
19.1
27.8
15.5
37.9
List of Existing Trees:

Sr. No. Common Name
1
Neem
2
Babhul
3
Subabhul
4
Sonchapha
Total
Budgetary allocation :
Height
3M
3M
2M
2M
Nos.
11 nos.
3 Nos.
2 Nos.
1 Nos
17 Nos
Chairman
70
Energy

O & M Cost : 5 Lakh/annum
Power supply:
Sr.
Power Requirement
Source of power supply :Maharashtra State

Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

a) Demand Load
60 KW
During Operation Phase,

Demand Load
Connected Load
2236 KVA
3422.25 KVA
Traffic Management

during operation phase
1 no. x 320 KVA
Transformer
4 nos. x 630 KVA
Fuel used
HSD

Common area lighting with CFL lamp
All lifts will be soft - staring
Energy Efficient pumping
High efficiency LED/CFL light for street light in place of
Metal Halide
Solar water heating system to Common Toilet of each flat.
Capital Cost: Rs. 83.63 Lakhs
O & M Cost: Rs.1.5 Lakhs/Annum
DG Set:
During Construction Phase : 1 nos. X 80 KVA
During Operational phase: Residential: - 1 no. X 320 KVA
Parking Statement
2 Ten. having carpet

area 40 to 80 sq. m.
For 338 Tenements
1 Ten. having carpet
area 80 to 150 sq.m.
For 94 Tenements
For 100 sq.m Carpet
Area
For 309.88 sq.m
Provided Provided Provided

Car
Scooter Cycle
01
04
04
169
01
676
04
676
04
94
02
376
06
376
02
06
18
06
Chairman
71
Total
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
Total
Environmental
Management plan
269
Vehicle
No. of
Vehicle
269
1070
Car
2
Wheeler
Cycle
1058
1070
1058
Area/Vehicle
Total Area
12.50 sq.m
3.00 sq.m
3362.50
3210.00
1.40 sq.m
1481.20
8053.70
sq.m
Width of all Internal roads (m): 6 m Wide

Construction Phase: 7.5 lakhs
Operation Phase:
Capital cost: 240.13 lakhs
O&M cost: 30.65 lakhs / annum
Decision:
1. Submit the consent for water supply for the required quantity from the competent authority.
2. Submit RWH calculations with hydrogeological, geotechnical details and large scale
drawings.
3. Submit details of compliance to ECBC / BEE guidelines.
4. Relocate UGT, STP and Transformer etc so as to facilitate the easy movement of fire tender,
preferably with 9 m wide road, at least on one side.
Chairman
72
Item No. 15
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of sugar unit from 3500 TCD
8500 TCD at Gat No. 415,417,418,419, Village Pimpalner, The. Madha Dist.
Solapur by M/s. Vitthalrao Shinde SSK Ltd.
(File No. SEAC 2010/CR- 849/ TC2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
New
project/Expansion
in existing project /
Diversification in
exiting project
Previous
Considerations
If expansion /
Diversification,
Whether
environmental
clearance has been
obtained for existing
project (If yes,
enclose a copy with
compliance table)
Type of Project
Total plot Area :
Built up Area :
Notified Industrial
Area/ Estate:
EIA Submitted?
Estimated cost of
The project :
Location details of
The project :
Proposed expansion of sugar unit from 3500 TCD 8500 TCD

M/s. Vitthalrao Shinde SSK Ltd.
M/s. Saitech Research and Development
Gat No. 415,417,418,419 Gangamainagar, Pimpalner Talika Madha dist
Solapur.
57th SEAC Meeting held on 21st June 2012

Environmental Clearance for Cogeneration unit of 30.0 MW is obtained.
5 (j) Sugar Industry

70.0 Hectares.
3.0 Hectares.
Yes.
Land: 1.5 Cr.
Building Structure: 15.0 Cr.
Plant & Machinery: 83.50 Cr.
Miscellaneous: 2.078 Cr.
Total: 102.078 Crores.
Latitude : 1800257.70N
Longitude : 7501511.75E
Chairman
73
Elevation above Mean Sea Level (metres): 551 Meters

Nature of terrain (hilly, valley, plain, Costal plains etc.: Plain
Nature of Soil (sandy, clayey, sandy loam etc.): clayey
Ground water table levels (Pre & post monsoon): 80 M 50 M. on an
average.
Distance from
Protected Areas /
Critically Polluted
areas / Eco-sensitive
areas / inter-State
boundaries
Raw materials
(including process
chemicals, catalysts,
& additives)
No Eco sensitive area or polluted areas or interstate boundary within 10

km area as informed by PP.
List of raw
Materials to
Be used
Sugarcane
Lime
Phosphoric
acid
Lubricants
Washing
Soda
Caustic soda
Production Profile
Physical
and
chemical
nature of
raw
material
Soild
Solid alkali
Solid acid
Oil grease
Solid alkali
Quantity
(tonnes / month)
full
Production
capacity
Means of
Transportation
(Source to storage
site ) with
Justification
5000 MT/day
300 MT/month
4.0 MT/month
Trucks ,Tractor
Trucks
Trucks
3.2 MT/month
0.016 Kg/100
Qtl cane
Solid alkali 0.220 Kg/100
Qtl cane
Bleaching
Liquid
0.007 Kg/100
powder
Qtl cane
Boiler
Liquids
0.127 Kg/100
Chemicals
Qtl cane
Name of products, Existing
Proposed
Byproducts and
activity
Intermediate
(new /
Products
modernizatio
n/
expansion)
A.Main Products
B. By-product
Products
Existing
Proposed
consented additional
capacitycapacityMT/M
MT/M
Sugar
14490
18000
Molasses
5040
6000
Bagasse
37800
52500
Pressmud
5040
6000
Tanker
Trucks
Trucks
Trucks
Trucks
Total
Total capacity
after proposed
ExpansionMT/M
32490
11040
90300
11040
Chairman
74
Water Conservation
Sewage and Waste

Water
Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) ;

(All details like recharge pits, storage tank capacity etc ) Roof top rain
water harvesting along with storage tank of 4.0 lakh liter.
Water supply - Total water required :- 850 M3/day
Source:- River/ Groundwater/ Industrial Area (if groundwater,
Commitment letter to be obtained from Central /State Ground water
authorities)
Quantity of recycled water : (m3/ day)
Total Water Requirement :
Process : 500 M3/day
Cooling water: 275 M3/day
DM Water : 25 M3/day
Others:50 M3/day
Total Effluent generation :
Domestic Effluent : Quantity & Disposal : 40 M3/day agricultural and
gardening
Trade Effluent : Quantity & Disposal : If discharge in CETP then
Membership letter required
Capacity of STP :
Capacity of ETP : 1600 M3/day
Physico- chemical analysis of treated water to
be used in project:
Point of final discharge (Quantity discharged in
m3/day): About 30 acres agricultural land of karkhana
Effluent Dischrage :
Parameters (Ph,
BOD, COD, etc. )
pH : 7.0
BOD < 30 ppm
COD < 100 ppm
Solid waste
Management :
Green Belt
Development
Details of Fuel used:

Source of fuel :
Mode of
Transporation of
Source
Effluent
Standard limit (
PI mention
Industry
specific
standard )
Qty
(TPM)
5.0
1.0
Proposed
Limit
pH : 7.0
BOD < 30
ppm
COD < 100
ppm
Composition
MPCB
Consent
pH : 7.0
BOD < 30
ppm
COD < 100
ppm
ETP
ETP sludge
Oily Sludge
Used Oil
Green belt area :
Area in Sq. mtr- 120000.
Existing nos. of trees, proposed nos. of trees , with plant speciesNumber trees being cut/ replanted or compensated- 11200 existing
proposed tree plantation of about 16000 trees.
Fuel
Daily Consumption
Calorific
%
%
(TPD/KLD)
Value
Ash Sulph
ur
Existing
Proposed Kcals / Kg
Other
1800
840
2200
1 % 0.04%
Chairman
75
Fuel to site
(PL
specify)
Atmospheric
Emissions
Pollutant
Source of
Emission
Emission rate
(kg/hr )
SPM
SO2
NOX
CO
Plant
Section &
units
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Height from
ground level
(m)
12.024
28.0
7.2
12.0
Internal
Diameter
(Top)(m)
Stack emission
Details :
Details of Pollution
Control Systems
Boiler
existing
Proposed
Boiler
Item
Air
Water
Noise
Solid
Waste
Emission Standard
Ambient Air Quality

Data
Energy
Pollutants
(SPM, SO2
etc)
SPM
S02
Pollutants
Bagasse
Bagasse
65.0
3.2
85.0
3.6
Existing
ESP / DUST
COLLECTOR
ETP Consisting of
primary treatment,
secondary treatment.
Lubricating systems
Concentration in
flue as
( g/m3 )
0.1 gm/NM3
0.063 gm/NM3
0.045 gm/NM3
0.083 gm/NM3
Emission Temp.of
Rate
Exhaust
Gases
8.33
140
gm/s
3.34
140
gm/s
ESP
ETP with anaerobic followed by
aerobic system with sand and
carbon filter.
Proposed noise friendly
machines
Fly ash Sale to Brick
manufacturers/Composting
Fly ash Sale to Brick

manufacturers
/Composting
Emission
Proposed
Standard
Limit
Limit ( mg/Nm3 ) ( mg/
Nm3)
150 Mg/Nm3
100
Mg/Nm3
Permissible
Standard
MPCB
Consent
( mg/Nm3)
100 Mg/Nm3
Proposed
Concentration
(in g/m3.)
3
PM 10 ug/m
120.0
82.0
PM 2.5 ug/m3
80.0
59.0
SO2 ug/m3
80.0
26.0
3
Nox ug/m
80.0
30.0
CO ppm
2000
240
Total Power Requirement (MW ) , Source of Power
Present ( in existing ) 8.0 MVA
Proposed: 2.0 MVA
DG Sets : 500 KVA
Chairman
76
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Public Hearing
details
Sr. No.
Recurring
Cost
Per amount
30.0 Lakh
35.0
1.
2.
Capital Cost

600.0 Lakh
Water Pollution
450.0
Control
3.
Noise Pollution
0.10
1.50
Control
4.
Environment
7.0
---Monitoring and
Management
5.
Reclamation
NA
NA
borrow / mined area
6.
Occupational Health
5.0
7.
Green Belt
5.0
35.0
8.
Others (Pl. Specify )
20.0
Total
102.10
1086.50
Date of Advertisement : 11/02/2012
Newspapers in which the advertisement appeared (With copies )
Date of Hearing: 12/03/2012
Panel Present: Addl collector Soalpur, Regional officer MPCB Pune,
Convener SRO MPCB Solapur.
Decision:
the proponent. The case was presented by the accredited consultant M/s. Saitech Research and
Development. Although the EIA studies were conducted by M/s Yogiraja Industrial Consultants,
they are yet to be accredited by QCI. Therefore, they had handed over the project to M/s. Saitech
Research and Development. All issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil,
ecology and biodiversity and social aspects were discussed.
SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance only after
complying with the following conditions:
1. Note on compliance of various concerns raised in the public hearing conducted.
2. Submit RWH and Storm Water Design calculations and details along with hydrogeological
and geotechnical data.
3. Submit details of fly ash generation, disposal and copy of agreement made with brick
manufacturing units for lifting the flyash.
4. Submit details of existing and proposed green belt area and plantation ( no. of plants per
species). The discrepancies in flora and fauna in the EIA report be corrected by including
domesticated flora and fauna in 10 km radius around the plant.
5. Submit an explanatory note on the exceedance of noise level observed at some.
Chairman
77
Item No. 16
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed construction (Residential Project) PICADILLY at At S.No. 110/3 (P) & 110/4/1 (P) At Wakad, Pune, Maharashtra
by M/s. Kumar Agro Products Pvt. Ltd.
(File No. SEAC-2011/CR-979/TC-2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Note on the initiated work
PICADILLY
M/s Kumar Agro Products Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Saitech Research and Development
At S.No. 110/3 (P) & 110/4/1 (P) At Wakad, Pune
Construction (Residential Project)
Construction work has been started based on sanctioned plan
no : B-P/Layout/Wakad/37/2011, Dated : 25/03/2011
Construction of buildings Number A & B is completed up
to 4th slab and Building Number C is completed up to 3rd
floor
LOI / NOC from MHADA / Other PCMC Sanction
approvals (If applicable)
Total Plot Area (m2)
Total Plot Area (m2)

Deductions (m2)
Net Plot area (m2)
Permissible FSI (including TDR etc.)

32489.16 m2
Proposed Built-up Area (FSI & Non- FSI area (m2)
FSI)
Non FSI area (m2 )
Total BUA area (m2)
20 %
(Note: Percentage of plot not open to
sky)
Rs.82 Crores
Total Number of Buildings: 11
26300.00
4877.01
21422.99
32425.42
19453.33
51878.75
Nos.
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J: P +12 & A1: G
Total tenants: 470 Nos.
Total Shops: 19 Nos.
2407 nos. persons
Number of expected residents / users
178 tenant /Hector
36 m
30 m wide DP road gets connects to site through 18 m wide
Proposed DP Road
Turning radius for easy access of fire 9 m
Chairman
78
tender movement from all around the

building excluding the width for the
plantation
Details of the demolition with disposal No , The project does not involve any demolition work
(If applicable)
Dry season:
UGT tanks
Source: PCMC and Recycler Water

Fresh water
: 236m3/day
Recycled water (flu)
: 84 m3/day
Recycled water (irri)
: 14 m3/day
: Not applicable.
Fire fighting
: 300 m3
: 206 m3/day
Wet Season:
Source: PCMC and Recycler Water
Fresh water
: 236 m3/day
Recycled water (flu)
: 84 m3/day
Recycled water (irri)
: 0 m3/day
: Not applicable.
Fire fighting
: 300 m3
: 220 m3/day
Level of the Ground water table :
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity : Location of the RWH tank(s) : Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity :
Size of the recharge pit = 2 m x 2 m x 0.9 m
Capital Cost: 4Lakhs
Location : Underground
Domestic : 345 cum,
Fire : 300 cum,
Recycled :120 cum
Natural water drainage pattern : North-East to south west
Quantity of storm water : 916 m3/day (channel is designed
for this flow)
Size of SWD: 600 mm dia
STP technology : F.A.B
Location of the STP : On Ground
Chairman
79

phase:
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved :
Disposal of the construction way debris: Construction
debris, Waste concrete and broken bricks will be
utilized in low-land leveling, secondary concrete, below
roads. Some quantity of Excavation soil will be use for
backfilling and remaining will be hand over to
authorized vendor.
etc.
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable) : Not
applicable
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : 6.5 kgs per day

gardening
Area requirement:
solid waste : For EPL 1000 OWP - 45 m2 & for storage of
waste 25m2
O & M Cost : 4 Lakhs/Annum
Total RG area:
1. RG area other than green belt (Please specify for
playground, etc.): -2. RG area under green belt:-RG on the ground : 2380 m2
Green Area:
Chairman
80
Total No. of Trees proposed: 328 Nos.

3. Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in the
ground RG:
List of Proposed Native Trees
Sr. No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
13.
14.
15
16
17.
18.
Name of plant
Plumeria Alba
Bauhinia Purpurea
Palash
Anthocephallus cadamba (Kadamba )
Mimosop Elengi
Michelia Champaka
Lagerstromia Flosregia
Nycanthes arbortristics (Parijatak)
Bauhinia Tomentosa
Arjun
Peltoforum
Mimosops elengii (Bakul )
Bauhinia racemosa (Apta)
Dillenea Indica
Azardirachta indica (Neem)
Putranjiva
Cassia fistula (Bahava)
Number and list of shrubs and bushes species to be

planted in the podium RG: NA
NOC for the Tree cutting / transplantation/ compensatory
plantation, if any : NA
4. Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost) :
O & M Cost : 8 Lakh /annum
Energy :
Power supply:
Sr. No.
1
2
3
Power Requirement
Source of power supply :Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution
Company Ltd.
a) Demand Load
60 KW
Demand Load
2462 KVA
b) Connected Load
3767.75 KVA
DG set as Power Back up during
1 nos. x 320 KVA
Chairman
81
5
6
operation phase
Transformer
Fuel used
4 nos. x 630 KVA

HSD

All lifts will be soft - staring VVVF
Energy Efficient pumping with nema premium efficiency
High efficiency LED/CFL light for street light in place of Metal Halide
Installation of APFC panel for power factor improvement to all induction loads
Detail calculations & % of saving
S
r
Description
Power Consumption
Conventional
Energy
equipments
Efficient
power
equipments
consumption
power
in KWH per consumption
Year
in KWH per
Year
197,100.00
167,535.00
Savings
in KWH
per Year
% Saving
Common area
29,565.00
15.00
lighting with CFL
lamps
2 All lifts will be soft 49,275.00
39,420.00
9,855.00
20.00
staring
3 Energy Efficient
110,868.75
86,231.25 24,637.50
22.22
pumping
4 High efficiency
87,600.00
74,460.00 13,140.00
15.00
LED/CFL light for
street light in place of
Metal Halide
5 Solar water heating
922,320.00
604,800.00 317,520.0
34.43
system will be
0
provided
Annual Savings with
1,367,163.75
972,446.25 394717.5
28.87
Energy Efficient
0
equipments
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: (Yes / No) (If yes then submit compliance in tabular
form):
Solar Water Heater System
Capital Cost: Rs. 91.82 Lakhs
Chairman
82
O & M Cost: Rs. 1.5 Lakhs/Annum

DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used :
During Construction Phase : 1 nos. x 80 KVA
During Operational phase : Residential:- 1 X 320 KVA
Traffic Management
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of
confluence: Project site gets connected to Mumbai Pune
highway through 18 M and 30 M Wide D P Road.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement: NA
Number and area of podia: NA
Total Parking Area Proposed : 7943.7 m2
Parking Statement
Required
Parking
as per DC
273
Cars
1054
Scooters
978
Cycles
Parking Area per

Provided Vehicle in
m2
273
12.5
1054
3
978
1.4
Width of all Internal roads (m):

All Internal roads are 6m wide
Road at entry of the site is 12 m and 18 M wide
Approach road is 30 m wide
Environmental
Management
plan
During Construction Phase:

Sr.
Parameter
1
2
3
4
5
6
Water for Dust Suppression

Site Sanitation & Safety
Environmental Monitoring
Disinfection
Health Check up
Total Cost
Total cost in
Lacs
0.7
1.5
2.4
1.4
1.5
7.5
During Operation Phase:

Sr
Pollution Control
Measures
Recurring
Cost Per
Annum
(Rs.
Lakhs)
Capital
Cost (Rs.
Lakhs)
Chairman
83
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pollution Control
STP & Noise
Control Measures
Environment
Monitoring
Solid Waste
Management
Solar water heater
system
Occupational Health
Green Belt
development
Rain water
harvesting
Total
10
75
24
1.5
91.82
3
8
10
75
0.15
31.65
279.82
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. The PP admitted that they have already initiated
construction work and Buildings A & B have been constructed up to 4th slab and up to 3 floors of
Building C. The PP informed that construction work has been stopped about 2 months ago. This is
a violation of EP Act. Environemnt Department may look into the matter and take necessary
action.
the proponent. The PP is directed to comply with the following observations
1. Submit an explanatory note with the history of the project and the reason for the violation.
2. Submit the consent for water supply from a competent authority indicating quantity.
3. The existing right of way is only 9 m, although there is a proposed DP of 18 m width, which
is not yet completed. In the present circumstances the project cannot be considered for
clearance as per existing norms. PP shall clarify the time frame for the completion of the DP
road with appropriate documents from a competent authority.
Full appraisal of the project will be done after the submission of the above said points.
Chairman
84
Item No. 17
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Housing Project - Forest County at
S. No. 40 (part), 41(part), and 59 (part) at Kharadi, Tq. Haveli, Dist: Pune by
M/s Ajanta Enterprises.
(File No. SEAC 2011/CR-934/TC2)
The The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee
noted project details furnished by the Project Proponent as:
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Forest County
M/s Ajanta Enterprises
M/s Mahabal Enviro Engineers Pvt Ltd
S. No. 40 (part), 41(part), and 59 (part) at Kharadi, Tq. Haveli,
Dist: Pune.
Housing Project
Type of Project
Whether in Corporation / Municipal / Pune Municipal Corporation
other area
Total Plot Area: 69955.27 Sq.mt.

Deductions: 7851.50 Sq.mt.
Net Plot area: 62103.77 Sq.mt.

1 + Road widening (91615.74 sq.mt.)
Proposed Built-up Area (FSI & Non- FSI area (sq. m.)
91610.74
FSI)
56088.10
(Note: Percentage of plot not open to
sky)

57.98 %
147698.84
295.30 Cr
Residential buildings: 18 Nos.
Building configuration:01 Basement + 01 Stilt + 12 floors
809 Tenements
Residential
Commercial
Total
135
39.15 m
18 m
4082
Nil
4082

plantation
Chairman
85
Dry season:
&
Source: Pune Municipal Corporation
Fire fighting (Cum): 500
Wet Season:
Fresh water (CMD): 380 &
Fire fighting (CMD): 500
Level of the Ground water table : 3.25 m

Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: NA
Location of the RWH tank(s): NA
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity:
Pit Size: 3.00 mt dia and 10-12 mt deep
No of Recharge Pits: 12 No.
Natural water drainage pattern: Storm water drainage system
varying from 600 mm to 900 mm will be provided for collection
of Storm Water
quantity of storm water : 30153 CMD
Size of SWD: Internal Strom water drainage line of 600mm x
600mm
STP technology: (Sequential Batch Reactor - SBR)
Capacity of STP (CMD) : 520
Location of the STP : Plan enclosed as Enclosure I
DG sets (during emergency): 1 x 320 KVA
Capital Cost: 1,30,00,000/O & M Cost: 13,00,000/- p.a.
Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction
phase:
Waste generation
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: 9960 cu.m.
Disposal of the construction way debris: Land filling on the
same site
Chairman
86
Energy
Traffic Management

Dry waste: Through Authorized vendors
Wet waste: OWC
STP Sludge(Dry sludge): Digested & used as manure
Area requirement: Total Area:223 Sq. m
Capital Cost: 80,31,725/O&M cost : 4,80,000/-p. a
RG on the ground (sq. m.): 17940.69 Sq. m
RG on the Basement Top (sq. m.): 466.88 sqm
No of trees to be cut: 310
No of tress to be transplanted:95
Power supply:
Maximum demand : 5800 KW
Connected load : 5800 KW
Source : MSEDCL
Use of CFL lamps shall be used for Common area lighting &
solar operated street lights in open area
Use of non conventional energy i.e. Solar water heating system
Transformers are located close to load center to minimize
transmission losses
Thus total energy saving will be 2500 units/day
25% of energy saving
DG Set: 2 X 320 KVA capacities
Type of fuel used : Diesel
confluence: 1 No.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement:
No of Basement: 01
Area of per Basement: 29031.86 Sq. m
No. of Basement Top(Stilt): 01
Area of Basement Top: 11780.00 Sq. m
Number and area of podia : NA
Total Parking area : 63501.76 Sq m (open + covered)
Area per car: 30 Sq. m with drive way
Chairman
87
Environmental
Management
2-Wheelar: 2554 No., 4-Wheeler: 1682 No.

Public Transport
Width of all Internal roads (m): 6.00 m
plan I.Construction phase (with Break-up):
Capital cost
STP : 1,30,00,000 /RWH : 15,00,000 /SWM : 80,31,725 /Green Belt : 99,06,960 /Solar water : 1,63,28,000/Non-Conventional Energy: 7,50,00,000 /II. Operation Phase (with Break-up)STP : 13,00,000 /RWH : 30,000 /SWM : 4,80,000 /Green Belt : 5,00,000 /Solar Water : 42,000/Non-Conventional Energy: 11,00,000/ Capital: INR 4,87,66,685 / O & M: INR 23,52,000 /year
Quantum and generation of Corpus fund and Commitment :
All funds are arranged by the developer as capital
investment
Responsibility for further O &M: Developer will maintain all
the facilities for two years and then handed over to Society
thereafter.
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for
Environmental Clearance only after complying with the following conditions:
1. Submit a note with compliance of previous EC granted by MoEF for Phase-I.
2. Submit detailed calculations regarding ground coverage.
3. Submit the consent for water supply from the competent authority indicating quantity
4. Considering the retention of existing trees and plants for proposed plantation the PP should
consider plantation of more species of trees than the proposed, with a density of 1 tree per
20 m2.
inadequate.
Chairman
88
Item No. 18
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Residential & Commercial Construction
Project - Ishanya at Sr. No. 19A/3A Dhankawadi, Tq.: Haveli, Dist: Pune by M/s
Mahanagar Realty
(File No. SEAC-2011/ CR-44/ TC2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Category
Ishanya
M/s Mahanagar Realty
Sr. No. 19A/3A Dhankawadi, Tq.: Haveli, Dist: Pune
Residential & Commercial Construction Project
8(a) B2
Total Plot Area: 23,734.00 Sq.mt.
Deductions: 3,537.88 Sq.mt.
Net Plot area: 19,071.12 Sq.mt.
1.6
32,286.79
FSI)
39,189.89
71,476.68
37 %
158.843 Cr
Residential buildings: 03 Nos.
Commercial building: 01 No.
Residential Building configuration: 03 Basement + 1S + 20
floors
Commercial Building configuration: Ground floor
230 Tenements
Residential
1208
Commercial
43
Total
1251
115
Residential : 66.60 m
Commercial: 4.15 m
60 m
plantation
Chairman
89
Rail Water Harvesting (RWH)
Dry season:
Fire fighting (Cum): 40,000 lit.
Wet Season:
Fire fighting (CMD): 40,000 lit.
Pit Size: 2.00 m x 0.9 m deep
No of Recharge Pits: 15 No.
Capital cost: 5,00,000/O&M cost: 10,000/- p.a.
Natural water drainage pattern: AS per contour
Quantity of storm water : 11,269CMD
Size of SWD: 200mm x 600mm
STP technology: Aerobic biological treatment system
Capacity of STP (CMD) :150
DG sets (during emergency): 630 KVA X 4 No.
Capital Cost: 32,00,000/O & M Cost: 10,00,000/- p.a.
Construction phase:
Waste generation
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: 12,000CUM
Disposal of the construction way debris: Land filling on
the same site
Chairman
90
Energy

E waste (Kg/month): NA
Hazardous waste (Kg/month): NA
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): NA
Wet waste: OWC
E waste: NA
Hazardous waste: NA
Biomedical waste (If applicable): NA
STP Sludge(Dry sludge): Digested & used as manure
Area requirement:
1. Location(s) and total area provided for the storage and
treatment of the solid waste:
Total Area: 60 Sq. m
Capital Cost: 7,00,000/O&M cost : 4,36,000/-p. a
Total RG area:
Play ground, etc.) :NA
RG on the ground (sq. m.): 6,807 Sq. m
RG on the Basement Top (sq. m.): 2,832 sq m
3. Plantation:
planted in the Basement Top RG: 70
Capital cost: 1,22,34,600/O&M cost: 5,33,520/- p.a.
Power supply:
Maximum demand : 2520 units/day
Connected load : 2400 units/day
Source : MSEDCL
Use of T5-28W, CFL lamps shall be used for
Common area lighting
Use of non conventional energy i.e. Solar water
Chairman
91
Traffic Management
Environmental
Management
heating system, Solar PV panels for street lights.

Transformers are located close to load center to
minimize transmission losses
Thus total energy saving will be 1035 unit/ day
Detail calculations & 41% of saving
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: (Yes / No) (If yes
then submit compliance in tabular form)
Capital cost: 44,00,000/O&M cost: 60,000/- p.a.
DG Set:
630 KVA (4No.).
confluence: 1 No.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement:
No of Basement: 03
Area of per Basement (1):7229.17 m2
Area of per Basement (2&3): 21,687.51 m2
Total Parking area : 25,624.21
Area per car:12.5 Sq. m
2-Wheeler: 720 No.
4-Wheeler: 930 No.
Public Transport
Width of all Internal roads (m):12 &8 m
plan
Construction phase (with Break-up):
Capital cost
STP : 32,00,000/RWH : 5,00,000/SWM : 7,00,000/Green Belt : 1,22,34,600/Non-Conventional Energy: 44,00,000
Operation Phase (with Break-up)STP : 10,00,000 p.a
RWH : 5,00,000 p.a
SWM : 4,36,000 p.a
Green Belt : 5,33,520 p.a
Non-Conventional Energy: 60,000 p.a
Capital: 22,78,46,00
Chairman
92
O & M: 20,59,520 p.a

Quantum and generation of Corpus fund and Commitment :
All funds are arranged by the developer as capital investment
Responsibility for further O &M: Developer will maintain
all the facilities for two years and then handed over to
Society thereafter.
Decision:
The Committee noted a nalla is shown in the contour map layout. PP clarified that PMC
has allowed them to channalize nalla water through 1600 mm RCC pipeline vide letter no. 5961
dated 7.01.2012.
SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance only after
complying with the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Widen the 6 m internal road to 9 m width for easy fire tender movement as agreed by PP.
Submit details of compliance to ECBC guidelines.
Submit scheme for lighting and ventilation to basements.
Submit the consent for water supply from a competent authority indicating quantity.
Submit storm water drainage calculations.
Total of 400 trees of different species shall be planted.
Relocate STP to 1st basement with proper ventilation and operation and maintenance
clerance.
Chairman
93
Item No. 19
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Samrajya Balwantpuram - Residential &
Commercial Construction Project at Balawantpuram, Paud Road, Shiv Tirth
Nagar, Kothrud, Tq. Haveli, Dist:Pune by M/s. Pethkar Projects
The PP was absent
Chairman
94
Item No. 20
Subject: TOR for the proposed expansion / modification of industrial project at F-14,
Kulgaon MIDC, Badlapur (E), Dist Thane by M/s. Syglak Laboratories Pvt Ltd
(File No. SEAC 2011 / CR 975 / TC2)
Name of the
Project
Project Proponent
Type of project:
Expansion / modification of industrial project
Estimated cost of
the project :
Location details of
the project :
Production details
50 Lakh
Water Budget
Effluent
Generation
Hazardous waste
Generation
Stack Emission
Details:
M/s. Syglak Laboratories Pvt Ltd

5(f) Synthetic Organic Chemicals
F-14, Ku;gaon MIDC, Badlapur (E), Dist Thane

Metformin 10 MT/M
Thiopental Sodium 50 Kg/M
Mebendazole Poly C 150 Kg/M
Thimmersoal 25 Kg/M
Total Water requirment = 7 CMD
Industrial Effleunt = 5.5 CMD
Domestic Effleunt = 1.5 CMD
Spent solvents , ETP sludge
Stack of 15 m height to Boiler
Decision:
The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made and documents
submitted by the proponent. This is a microscale chemical industry hence can be considered in
B2 category exempting from EIA studies. The PP is directed to comply with the following
observations:
1. Submit revised Form-I with all details and prefeasibility report.
2. Details about air and water pollution control measures.
Chairman
95
Item No. 21
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Eiffel City at Chakan, Taluka-Khed, Dist.-Pune,
Maharashtra by M/s. Eiffel Developers and Realtors Ltd
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Eiffel City
M/s. Eiffel Developers and Realtors Ltd
GAT Nos. 1430, 1431, 1432, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1551, 1552,
1553/1, 1553/2, 1554, 1555, 1556, 1557 at Chakan, TalukaKhed, Dist.-Pune, Maharashtra
Type of Project
8(a) B2
Category
Yes, R.P. Rules, Rules for Area within 10 km from boundary of
Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC).
69300 m2
Total Plot Area
17325 m2
Deductions
51975 m2
Net Plot area
53014.50 m2
Net Permissible FSI
FSI area (m2)

47324.88 m2
(FSI & Non FSI)
Non FSI area (m2)

29298.10 m2
2
Total BUA area (m )

76950.27 m2
63.35 %
Ground Coverage (%)
Rs. 88 Crores (Approx)
Building Configuration:
configurations
Bldg A, B, J +K, W+ X, Y+ Z :- Stilt + 12 Upper floor
Bldg C+ D, F + G, H + I, S+ T, U+ V :- Stilt + 8 Upper
floor
Total
tenants:
785 nos.
Number of expected residents / 3925 nos. persons
users
Tenement density per hectare 151 Tenements/Hectare
36 m
road)
Turning radius for easy access
of fire tender movement from
all around the building
excluding the width for the
plantation
12 m wide Approach Road from Chakan-Talegaon Road (S.H.

No. 55)
Turning Radius = 9 m
Chairman
96
Existing structure
Details of the demolition with
disposal (If applicable)

No , The project does not involve any demolition work
Dry season:
Source: Gram Panchayat / Maharashtra

Pradhikaran (MJP)
Fresh water
: 371 m3/day
Recycled water
: 293 m3/day
: NA
Fire fighting
: 450 m3
: 137 m3/day
Jeevan
Wet Season:
Source : Gram Panchayat / Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran
(MJP)
Fresh water
: 371 m3/day
Recycled water
: 159 m3/day
: NA
Fire fighting
: 450 m3
: 271 m3/day
(RWH)


Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity : NA
Location of the RWH tank(s) : NA
Size of recharge pits and Quantity :
= 1 m x 1 m x 60 m Depth
STP technology : Extended Aeration System
Location of the STP : On Ground
DG sets (during emergency): 1 No. X 200 kVA
1 No. X 82.5 kVA
Green Belt Development :

RG on the ground : 42755 m2
List of Proposed Trees on Ground: Trees-
Chairman
97
Sr.
Botanical name
Common name
Qty
Ht. in m
T1
LEGERSTROMIA FLOS REGINA
PRIDE OF INDIA
107
8-10
T2
PLUMERIA ALBA
CHAMPA WHITE
33
4-6
T3
CARYOTA URENS
FISHTAIL PALM
51
4-6
T4
CASSIA FISTULA
GOLDEN SHOWER
67
4-6
T5
WODYETIA BIFURCATA
FOXTAIL PALM
25
6-8
T6
CASSIA JAVANICA
PINK CASSIA
48
10-12
T7
ALSTONEA SCHOLARIS
SAPTAPARNI
113
8-10
T8
ERYTHRINA INDICA VARIEGATED
PANGARA VARIEGATED
16
8-10
T9
MICHELIA CHAMPAKA
SOAN CHAFA
68
5-6
T10
FILICIUM DECIPIENS
FERN TREE
30
6-8
T11
BRASSIA ACTINOPHYLLA
UMBRELLA TREE
15
6-8
T12
PLUMERIA RUBRA
RED FRANGIPANI
06
4-6
T13
BAUHINIA PURPUREA
KANCHAN
41
6-8
T14
THEVETIA NERIIFOLIA
YELLOW BITTI
25
3-5
T15
CASSIA SPECTABILIS
YELLOW SHOWER
26
5-6
T16
BAUHINIA ACUMINATA
BAUHINIA DWARF WHITE
16
3-4
T17
BAUHINIATOMENTOSA
YELLOW ORCHID TREE
09
3-4
T18
CORDIA SABESTENA
SCARLET CORDIA
06
4-6
T19
TERMINALIA MANTALY
UMBRELLA TREE
11
4-6
T20
MIMUSOPS ELENGII
BAKUL
27
10-12
Total
740
Chairman
98

phase:
Disposal of the construction way debris: Construction debris,
Waste concrete and broken bricks will be utilized in low-land
leveling, secondary concrete, below roads. Some quantity of
Excavation soil will be use for backfilling and remaining will
be hand over to authorize vendor.
Dry waste : 529.88 kg/day
Wet waste : 1236.38 kg/day
etc.
applicable
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : 4.2 kg/day
Wet waste: Will be converted to compost using Organic Vermi
Composting
gardening
Area requirement:
solid waste: 222.55 sq.m.
Chairman
99
Energy
Traffic Management
Source of power supply :Maharashtra State Electricity

Distribution Company Ltd.
a) Demand Load
50 KW

a) Demand Load
b) Connected Load
3024 KW
4414 KW

during operation phase
1 no. x 200 kVA

1 no. x 82.5 kVA
Transformer
6 nos. x 630 kVA
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence:

Main junction, i.e. main approach road from S.H. No. 55.
Necessary rounding-off provided for internal road.
Component
Environmental Management
plan Budgetary Allocation
Open Space
Stilt
Total Parking
Area
Total Area in m2
Capiotal cost: 142 lakhs
O&M cost: 26 lakhs
Parking Provided
2W
4W
Cycles
418
296
982
564
240
0
982
536
982
3.00
20.00
1.40
2946.00
10720.00 1374.8
Decision:
the proponent. The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. All
issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology and biodiversity and social
aspects were discussed.
During the appraisal, the PP admitted that 80% of the construction work has already been
completed inspite of knowing the fact that it is mandatory to obtain prior EC for construction
project involving 20000 m2 build up area or more. The PP also admitted that the revised plan was
approved in 2010 and most of the construction work was carried out during 2011. The Committee
noted that the PP / Consultant had not submitted the above said fact in the documents submitted,
including Form-I, but revealed it only during the presentation. Environment Department may look
into matter for the aforesaid violation and take necessary action for the misrepresentation of the
data and violation.
.
It was also noted that the PP has not obtained the consent for water supply from a
competent authority and no sewerage facility is available catering to the project. The right of way
to the plot is 12 m, whereas the height of the building is 36 m, which does not comply with the
Chairman
100
MoEF OM dated 7th Feb, 2012. The ground coverage is very high (63%) As most of the
prerequisites are not met, SEAC decided to recommend rejection of the proposal for prior
Environmental Clearance.
Chairman
101
Item No. 22
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Expansion of Building and construction
project of ' Pimpri Chinchwad' at Sector No.26, Nigdi Pradhikaran, Pune by M/s.
Pimpri Chinchwad Education Trust
(File No. SEAC2212/CR116/TC2)
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project : Housing
project / Industrial Estate
/ SRA scheme / MAHADA
/ Township or others
Municipal / Other area
(If applicable)
Total plot area (Sq.m)

Deductions
Net plot area
Permissible FSI
Proposed Built UP Area
(FSI & Non FSI)
Ground coverage
percentage (%)
project
configuration (s)
Number of expected
residents / users

Right of way (width of the
road )
Expansion of Educational campus of Pimpri Chinchwad Educational

Trust, Nigdi
Mr V. S. Kalbhor ,Pimri Chinchwad Educational Trust
Educational campus
Sector No 26, Pradhikaran, Nigdi, Pune.

Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ( PCMC)
Total constructed work 36687.703 m2
(Existing17685.97 m2
2
+ Proposed 19001.73 m )
Date and area details in the necessary approvals issued by the competent
authority (attach scan copies)
Plot Area 40707.38 m2
Deductions - Nil
Net Plot area 40707.38 m2
61061.07 m2
FSI area (Sq.m): 36687.703 m2
Non FSI (Sq.m):
Total BUA area (Sq.m): 36687.703m2
23.24 % (9462.05 Sq. m)
Rs. 35.00 crore
Buildings 12 Nos.
Existing Population:
Floating population: 4060
Proposed Population:
Floating population: 1535
Max. - 19 m
18 m
Residential population: 580

Residential population: 450
Chairman
102
7.5 m
Existing Construction: 17685.97 m2
Existing structures(s)
Total Water Requirement Dry season :
Fresh water (CMD) :205 CMD of Source: Pimpri Chinchwad
Municiple Corporation (PCMC)
Recycled water (CMD): 268 CMD
Total water Requirement (CMD): 473 CMD
Swimming pool make up (Cum):
Fire fighting (Cum): 20,000 lit./Bldg.
Wet Season:
Fresh water (CMD) : 205 CMD
&
Source: Pimpri Chinchwad Municiple Corporation (PCMC)
Recycled water (CMD): 186 CMD
Total water Requirement (CMD): 205 CMD
Swimming pool make up (Cum): Fire fighting (Cum): 20,000 lit./Bldg.
(RWH)
Level of the Ground water table : 6 mtrs.

Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: Nil
Location of the RWH tank (s): Size, no of recharge pits and Quality: 4.0 m x 4.0 m x 4.0 m
15 Nos. pits
Budgetary allocation ( Capital cost and O & M cost):
Capital cost Rs. 46,00,000
O & M Cast - Rs. 50,000 / year
UGT tanks
Location(s) of the UGT tank(s): Refer Drawing

Natural water drainage pattern: Refer Storm Water Layout
Quantity of storm water:
Size of SWD- Size of harvesting pit - 1.0 m x 1.0 m
Sewage generation (CMD): 350 CMD
STP technology: MMBR
Capacity of STP (CMD): 400 CMD
Location of the STP: Refer STP Location Plan
DG sets (during emergency):
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O & M cost):
Capital Cost - Rs. 36,00,000
O & M Cost- Rs. 7,80,000/ year
Sewage and waste water
Chairman
103
Energy
Waste generation in the pre Construction and Construction phase:

Waste generation: top soil, debris
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: - use for landscaping
Disposal of the construction way debris: Use for Leveling
Waste generation in the operation phase:
Dry waste (Kg/day): 745 Kg/day
Wet waste (Kg/day): 1118 Kg/day
E waste (Kg/month): Hazardous waste (Kg/month):
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day):15 Kg/Day (100% Dry )
Mode Of Disposal of Waste:
Dry waste (Kg/day): Sold Out
Wet waste (Kg/day): Composting and vermicomposting
E waste (Kg/month): Hazardous waste (Kg/month):
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day): Used as Manure
Area requirement:
Location (s)& total area provided for the storage & treatment of solid
Waste: area -12 x 4 x 2(No of pits: 02)
Location - Refer Master Plan
Budgetary allocation( capital Cost & O&M cost):
Capital Cost- Rs. 11,50,000/O & M cost Rs. 1,75,000 / year
Total RG area: 6106.10 m2
3. RG area other than green belt (please specify for
playground,etc): - 16402.31 m2(Total play ground)
4. RG area under green belt:--5. Plantation:
Existing Green Belt:
Total No of Trees: 610
Number of Varieties: 30
Total No of Shrubs: 230 Number of varieties: 15
Earthen pots: 165
Number of varieties: 14
6. Budgetary allocation( capital Cost& O& M Cost):
Capital Cost Rs. 6,50,000
O & M Rs. 1,00,000/ year
Power Supply:
Maximum demand: KW
Connected Demand: 240 KW
Source: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company
Limited(MSEDCL)
Chairman
104
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Traffic Management
Energy Saving measures : Solar, CFL, Electronic Ballast

Detail Calculation & % of saving : 23%
% saving behind solar energy 6.4 %
Compliance of the ECBC guideline( YES/NO) (If yes then submit
compliance in tabular : Yes
Budgetary allocation( capital Cost& O& M Cost)
Solar Energy
Capital Rs. 12,00,00/O & M Cost - 50,000/ year
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used:
D.G. sets - 125KVA 1 No, 85 KVA 1 No, 65 KVA 1 No
Type of fuel used: HSD - Total 60 Lit/hrs.
Operation Phase( with break Up) Capital Cost
STP
36,00,000
RWH
46,00,000
MSW
11,50,000
Solar Energy System
12,00,000
Landscaping
6,50,000
O & M cost( Please ensure manpower and other details):
STP
7,80,00
RWH
50,000
MSW
1,75,000
Solar Energy System
50,000
Landscaping
1,00,000
Total parking area : 7653.92 m2

Width of all Internal road(m):
Drive way 7.5 M
Decision:
the proponent. The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. All
issues related to environment, including air, water, land, soil, ecology and biodiversity and social
aspects were discussed. The PP has already constructed more than 28,000 m2 of the project. The
Committee is of the opinion that the consultant M/s. Saitech Research & Development
Organization has not advised the PP regarding mandatory requirements of EC and this has been
found in many other cases. This violation may be noted by the Environment Department and
necessary action may be taken.
Chairman
105
1. Submit note on history and chronological details of the project as the construction of
28,808 m2 is already done without obtaining prior EC.
2. Submit the area statement including FSI and Non-FSI components.
3. No treated waste water shall be discharged into the nalla.
4. Submit the detailed water budget for both dry and wet seasons. During the rainy season
water may not be required for irrigation. Justification of disposal of treated waste water for
land irrigation during rainy season may be submitted.
5. Submit treated waste water characteristics from STP as there are inconsistencies observed
in Form-I and presentation made before the Committee. Locate the STP atappropriate
location.
6. Submit details of Solid Waste management w.r.t. collection, segregation, composting and
area allotted for the same.
7. Submit details of DG set specification, installation and maintenance.
8. Submit a note on energy conservation measures in accordance with ECBC / BEE
guidelines.
inadequate.
10. Submit locational details of green belt development. Plant more trees need to be planted in
rows on the boundary of both playgrounds and preferably in clusters / groves.
11. Ensure easy fire tender movement around the building by providing 9 m wide road on at
least one side and submit the revised plans.
Chairman
106
Item No. 23
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Residential Project at Balewadi Taluka.
Haweli District. Pune by M/s. Kunal Spaces Pvt. Ltd. (Compliance case)
Name of the Project

Project Proponent
Consultant
Type of Project
Category
Total Plot Area
Deductions
Net Plot area
Net Permissible FSI
(FSI & Non FSI)
Residential Project
M/s. Kunal Spaces Pvt. Ltd.
At Survey No. 49/2, 49/3, 50/1, 50/5, 50/6, 49/4, 49/5, 49/6,
Balewadi Taluka. Haweli District. Pune
8(a) B2
Yes, As per Pune DCR
36258.73 m2
12821.85 m2
23436.88 m2
43111.23 m2
FSI area (m2)
43057.20 m2
Non FSI area (m2)
36205.56 m2
Total BUA area (m2)
79315.80 m2
4103.16
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
Estimated cost of the project Rs. 101 Crores (Approx)
Type A to Type D - Basement + Parking + 15 Floors.
configurations
Type E & Type F Basement + Parking + 14 Floors
Shops: 12 nos.
shops
2364 nos. persons
Number of expected
residents / users
Type A to Type D: 50.0 m
Type E & Type F: 49.60 m
18 m
road)
9m
Chairman
107
Existing structure

with disposal (If applicable)

(RWH)

Existing Structures to be retained:

We are regularizing two structures (houses) of farmers built
on site long before
The construction debris amounting to 2 to 3 tones per day shall
be used within the site for leveling purposes and base course
preparation of internal approach roads.
Dry season:
Source: Pune Municipal Corporation[PMC]
Fresh water
: 214.21 m3/day
Recycled water
: 142.41 m3/day
Total Water Requirement : 356.62 m3/day
: NA
Fire fighting
: 20 m3
: 138.30 m3/day
Wet Season:
Source : Pune Municipal Corporation [PMC]
Fresh water
: 214.21 m3/day
Recycled water
: 103.47 m3/day
Total Water Requirement : 317.68 m3/day
: NA
Fire fighting
: 20 m3
: 177.04 m3/day
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity : Not Applicable
Location of the RWH tank(s) : Not Applicable
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity :
Size of the recharge pit = 2 m x 0.9 m x 2 m
Depth for Bore = 100 mm diameter with 10 m depth
Sewage generation : 280.51 m3/day
STP technology : Compact Type STP
Location of the STP : Under Ground
phase:
a. Disposal of the construction way debris: Construction
Chairman
108
debris [It include concrete waste, broken bricks,

metallic scraps etc.] that shall be used for leveling and
base course preparation and remaining will be hand
over to authorized vendor.
Dry waste : 512.50 kg/day
Wet waste : 512.50 kg/day
etc.
applicable
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) : 17 kg/day
gardening
Area requirement:
solid waste : For EPL 1000 - 100 m2
RG on the ground : 3061.10 m2
Lawn Area on ground: 1050.20 m2
Area of Grass Pavers (40% Green): 596.90 m2
Total No. of Trees proposed: 236 Nos.
Plantation:
List of Trees Proposed:
Sr.
Botanical Name
Common
C/C
Nos.
No.
Name
distance
(m)
1.
Nyctanthes
Parijatak
3.0
29
arbortristis
2.
Plumeria Alba
Champa
3.0
26
white
Chairman
109
3.
Plumeria Rubra
4.
5.
Azadirachta indica
Allistonia Scholaris
6.
7.
8.
Mimusops elengi
Michelia Champaka
Lagerstromia
Speciosa
9.
10.
11.
12.
Kadamba
Cassia Fistula
Putrangia roxburghii
Dillenia indica
13.
14.
Pongamia glabra
Spathodia
campanulata
Peltoforum
15.
16.
Bauhinea blackeana
Total
Champa
red
Neem
Devils
Tree
Bakul
Sonchafa
Lagerstrom
ia Flos
Regina
Kadamb
Amalas
Putranjiva
Elephant
apple
Karanj
Fountain
tree
3.0
08
4.0
08
14
5.0
4.0
3.0
5.0
18
06
12
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
28
20
03
15
4.0
5.0
11
20
Copper pod 4.0

tree
Kanchan
5.0
16
02
236
List of proposed Drought Tolerant Shrubs/Ground Covers:

Sr.
No.
Botanical Name
Common
Name
1.
Hymenocallis
littoralis
Ixora duffii pink
Spider lily
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Hamelia dwarf
Lumonea
Spectablis
Caesalpinea
Pulcherima new
pink
Thevetia
Allamanda
Yellow dwarf
C/C
Qty.
distance (m2)
(m)
0.3
160.50
Ixora
hybrid pink
Fire Bush
Ravenia
Spectablis
0.45
69.80
0.45
207.75
51.00
Caesalpinea
new pink
(Shankasur
Pink)
0.6
15.00
Bitti
Allamanda
cathartica
0.6
0.3
45.00
Chairman
110
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Kund
Multiflorum
Wadellia
Trilobata
Ocimum
Sanctum
Cestrum
nocturmum
Tabernaemontan
a coronaria
variegated
Plumbago
Capensis
Lumonea
Spectablis
Tecoma Capensis
Golden
Kund
0.45
40.50
Wadellia
0.6
95.00
Tulsi
0.3
38.00
Ratrani
0.45
216.90
Tagar
variegated
0.45
710.95
chitrak
0.45
139.00
0.45
51.00
0.45
48.00
0.45
45.00
0.45
77.50
1.5
0.45
15.50
42.00
0.45
0.3
149.60
98.00
0.3
75.50
0.3
25.00
0.6
276.75
0.6
48.60
Ravenia
Spectablis
Tecoma
Capensis
Golden
Nerium Oleander Oleander
Carnea
Single red
Ixora Hybrid Red ixora duffii
red
Plumeria pudica
hibiscus rosa
hibiscus
sinensis
single red
Oleander Dwarf
lantana white
lantana
erect
white
Lantanq blue
lantana
erect
Blue
Lantana camara
lantana red
red
caesalpinia
caesalpinea
pulcherima
red
caesalpinia
caesalpinia
pulcherima flava yellow
Creepers:
Sr.
No.
Name
Qty. Nos.
Chairman
111
Krushna Kamal
Kusar
1
2
4
4
List of Existing Trees:

Sr.
No.
1
2
3
Common Name
Height
Aamba
Aamba
Umbar
Diamete
r
1.72
1.74
1.29
Babul
0.98
20.00
Bor
0.73
15.00
Babul
0.94
20.00
Babul
1.08
20.00
Unknown Vel
0.40
15.00
Kadu limb
1.47
40.00
10
Babul
1.29
15.00
11
Kadu limb
0.73
15.00
12
Peru
0.99
20.00
13
Peru
0.81
20.00
14
Babul
1.29
30.00
15
Umbar
1.29
20.00
16
Kadu limb
1.32
30.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
O & M Cost : 4 Lakh/annum
Chairman
112
Energy
Power supply: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution

Company Ltd.
Sr.
No.
1
Source of power supply :Maharashtra State

Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

- Demand Load
60 KW

a) Demand Load
b) Connected Load
2629.5 KW
2629.5 KW
Traffic Management
Power Requirement
DG set as Power Back

up during operation phase
1 no. x 200 KVA
Transformer
5 nos. x 630 KVA
Fuel used
HSD

All lifts will be soft - staring
Energy Efficient pumping
High efficiency LED/CFL light for street light in place of
Metal Halide
confluence: Site is near to Mumbai Pune express high way.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement: One Basement for each
building, Area: 9908.53 m2
Number and area of podia: Not Applicable
Parking Statement
Parking Requirement as per MD
Flats below 80.0 m2 No. 234 Car
Scooter Cycle
(For 2 Flats 1:4:4)
117
468
468
Flats above 80.0 m2
420
630
840
2
Below 150.0 m
No. 210 (For 1 Flat 2:3:4)
Commercial 500.00 m2
20
60
20
(For 100 m2 4:12:4
Total Parking Required
557
1158
1296
Total Parking Provided
559
1158
Width of all Internal roads (m): Main approach road of width
18 m. (D.P. Road)
Chairman
113
Environmental
Management plan
Construction Phase: 7.5 lakhs

Operation Phase: Capital cost: 51 lakhs and O&M cost: 27.5
lakhs
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed.SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for
Environmental Clearance only after complying with the following conditions:
1. Submit PMC order along with the DCR extract applicable for the amenity space handed
over to PMC for which reservation for HDH is made.
2. NA is yet to be obtained. Submit an undertaking that the project will be commenced only
after receiving NA permission from Collector, Pune.
3. if the road is not constructed before the completion of the project, submit an undertaking to
construct 18 m wide DP road on their own,. NO OC may be issued unless the 18 m road is
constructed.
4. Depth of RWH bore shall be 12 m instead of 10 m.
5. Submit a note on energy conservation measures in accordance with ECBC / BEE guidelines.
6. Submit the consent for water supply and waste water disposal from the competent authority
7. Total 293 trees to be planted along the boundary wall located minimum 1.5 m away from
the wall.
Chairman
114
Item No. 24
Subject: Environmental clearance for Konark Meadows at Gat No. 1185/A, Plot No. 3,
Near Wagheshwar Temple, Behind Moze College, Wagholi, Pune by M/s. Karia
Realty
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Location of the
project
Type of Project
Category
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other
area
Note on the initiated
work (If applicable)
Total Plot Area
Permissible FSI
Proposed Built-up
Area (FSI & NonFSI)
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
project
configuration(s)
Number of tenants
and shops
Konark Meadows
M/s. Karia Realty
M/S. Saitech Research & Development Organization
Gat No. 1185/A, Plot No. 3, Near Wagheshwar Temple, Behind
Moze College, Wagholi, Pune
8(a) B2
Wagholi gram panchayat
The Work has been initiated and the construction details are as
follows:
Building A- RCC work P+7+ BBM 4th floor
Building B- RCC work P+8+ BBM 4th floor
Building C- RCC work P+8+ BBM 5th floor
Building D- RCC work P+1
Total Plot Area (sq. m.): 14700 Sq. m
Deductions: 3675 Sq. m
Net Plot area: 11025Sq. m
Permissible FSI (including TDR etc.): 13230.00Sq.M
FSI area (sq. m.): 13225.28 Sq.M
Non FSI area (sq. m.): 8872.29 Sq.M
Total BUA area (sq. m.): 22,097.57 Sq.M
Ground-coverage Percentage (%): 1538.97 Sq.M
(Construction + land) : Rs 44.11 crs
Configuration of Buildings
Building A- P + 11 Floors
Building B- P + 11 Floors
Building C- P + 12 Floors
Building D- P + 11 Floors
Total flat: 176 nos.
176 Flats
Chairman
115
Number of expected
residents / users
Tenant density per
hector
Height of the
building(s)
Right of way (Width

of the road)
Turning radius for
easy access of fire
tender movement
from all around the
building excluding
the width for the
plantation
Total Water
Requirement
Rain Water
Harvesting (RWH)
UGT tanks
Storm water
drainage
Sewage and Waste
water
880 people
120 per hector
Building A- 35.30 mtrs.
Building B- 37.05 mtrs.
Building C- 37.95 mtrs.
Building D- 35.92 mtrs.
15 M
6M
Dry season:
Fresh water (CMD): 70.033 CMD
Source: Borewll/Tanker
Recycled water (CMD): 55.742 CMD
Total Water Requirement (CMD):125.775CMD
Swimming pool make up (Cum): 9.250 CMD
Fire Fighting (Cum): 200 CMD
Wet Season:
Fresh water (CMD):70.033 CMD
Source: Borewell/Tanker
Total Water Requirement (CMD):111.538 CMD
Swimming pool make up (CMD): same as above
Fire Fighting (CMD): same as above
Level of the Ground water table: 14 M Below ground
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: capacity of 1 RHW
borewell is 8.38 m3/day, 5 recharge borewells are proposed
Location of the RWH tank(s): As per attached Drawing
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity: 1.5 m x 1.5m x 5 nos.
Capital: 60 lakhs
O&M: 4.0 lakhs
Location(s) of the UGT tank(s) as per attached Drawing
Natural water drainage pattern: Maintained
Quantity of storm water: 190.36 m3/day.
Size of SWD: As per attached Drawing
Sewage generation (CMD): 100.620 CMD
STP technology: MBBR
Chairman
116
Capacity of STP (CMD): one STP (101 m3/day)

Location of the STP: As per drawing
DG sets (during emergency): 1 No.180 kva
Capital:10 lakhs
O&M: 2.69 lakhs per annum
Waste generation: 25 Kg/day from workers
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved
Disposal of the construction way debris: Demolished Debris:
NA
Excavation is for building footings and leveling of ground
Excavated Quantity: 3180 m3.
Dry waste (Kg/day): 171.89 Kg/day
Wet waste (Kg/day): 165.15 Kg/day
E waste (Kg/month): Nil
Hazardous waste (Kg/month):Nil
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable):Nil
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day): 10 Kg/day
Dry waste: Send to Gram Panchayat Wagholi.
Wet waste: Vessel Composting (OWC)
E waste: Nil
Hazardous waste: Nil
Biomedical waste (If applicable): Nil
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Used as manure
Area requirement:
1. Location(s) and total area provided for the storage and treatment of
the solid waste: As per Drawing
Capital Cost: 4 laks
O&M Cost: 1 lakh per annum
RG on the ground :1060 Sq.m
Podium (sq. m.): 1034.2 sq. m.
Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in the ground
RG: 170 Nos. of trees
Capital cost: 19.20 lakhs
O&M: 3 lakhs per annum
Solid waste
Management
Green Belt
Development
Chairman
117
Energy
Power supply:
Maximum demand: 700 KW
Connected load: 49.55 KW
Source: MSEDCL
Energy saving measures: Solar Lighting, CFL
Detail calculations & % of saving: 30.9 %
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: (Yes / No) (If yes then
submit compliance in tabular form): Yes
Capital Cost: 50 lakhs
O&M: 2 lakhs
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used: 1 No.180 kva
Type of fuel used: HSD
Traffic Management Parking details:
Total Parking area: 2900.30 sq.mt
Area per car: ( after deducting ramp and service and duct area)
Car: 127 nos
2-Wheelar: 237 Nos
Cycle: 237 Nos
Width of all Internal roads (m): 6 M
Environmental
Construction phase:
Management
plan
Capital cost: 50 lakhs, O & M cost: 10 lakhs
Budgetary
Operation Phase:
Allocation
Capital cost: 337 lakhs, O&M cost: 92 lakhs
Decision:
PP stated that the construction work has already been initiated and Buildings A, B C and D
have been built. PP stated that he has handed over the amenity space to the Collector in lieu of
which additional FSI is claimed and the total built up area now exceeds 20,000 m2 and hence
applied for EC.
The Committee noted that the current approach road is 5 m wide and there is a proposed
DP road of 18 m width. The maximum height of the building is 37.25 m, therefore, the project
cannot be considered in light of MoEF OM dated 7.02.2012, until the DP road of 18 m width
is constructed. The PP has not obtained the consents for water supply and drainage facility
from competent authorities. In view of the nonavailability of the major prerequisites, SEAC
decided to recommend rejection of the proposal for Environmental Clearance
Chairman
118
Item No. 25
Subject: Environmental clearance for the setting up of Bulk Drug manufacturing unit at
plot no. E-2, MIDC, Chincholi, Solapur by M/s. Avon Organics Limited (Bio-Tech
Division)
(File No.: SEAC- 2011/CR.697/ TC.2)
The PP was absent.
Chairman
119
Item No. 26
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Construction (Housing Project) Manjri Green Woods at Survey No. 73A/1 +2A + 75/2 (P), Manjri Budruk, Tq: Haveli,
Dist: Pune-28 by M/s Maloji Constructions
Manjri Green Woods
M/s Maloji Constructions
Survey No. 73A/1 +2A + 75/2 (P), Manjri Budruk, Tq:
Haveli, Dist: Pune-28
Construction (Housing Project)
Type of Project
8(a) B2
Category
Total constructed work (FSI+ Non FSI): 11,936.46
Date and area details in the necessary approvals issued by
the competent authority (attach scan copies)
Total Plot Area: 30,500.00 Sq.mt.
Deductions: 9,382.01 Sq.mt.
Net Plot area: 21,117.99 Sq.mt.
1.0
27,445.93
FSI)
18,079.36
45,525.29
30.41%
49 Cr
14 Residential Buildings, P+4 & P+9, with 2 and 3 BHK
apartments
464 Tenements
Name of the Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
2320

250
P+4: 14.25m
P+9: 28.5 m
18 m
Turning radius for easy access of fire 7.5 m
plantation
Dry season:
Chairman
120

&
Source: Well water/ Manjri Grampanchayat
Fire fighting (Cum): 2,00,000 Lit.
Wet Season:
Source: Well water/ Manjri Grampanchayat
Fire fighting (CMD): 2,00,000 Lit.
Level of the Ground water table : 3.5 m
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity: 2.5m Length X 0.75
m width, 35 No.
Capital cost: 6,00,000/O&M cost: 75,000/-p.a.
Natural water drainage pattern: As per contour
quantity of storm water : 13,869.52 KL/yr
Size of SWD: 300 to 600 mm
STP technology: Deep Tank Aeration System
Capacity of STP (CMD) : 275
Location of the STP : Plan enclosed
DG sets (during emergency) : 62.5 KVA X 1 No.
Capital Cost: 30,00,000/O & M Cost: 6,00,000/- p.a.
Construction phase:
Waste generation
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: 7000 CUM
Disposal of the construction way debris: Land filling on
the same site
E waste (Kg/month): NA
Hazardous waste (Kg/month): NA
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): NA
Chairman
121
Energy

Wet waste: OWC
E waste: NA
Hazardous waste: NA
Biomedical waste (If applicable): NA
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Manure
Area requirement:
treatment of the solid waste:
Total Area: 80Sq.m
Capital Cost: 6,00,000/O&M cost : 4,00,000/-p.a
Total RG area:
Play ground, etc.)
RG on the ground (sq. m.): 4911 Sq. m
RG on the podium (sq. m.) : NA
3. Plantation:
ground RG: List enclosed as Enclosure III
planted in the podium RG: NA
Number and list of trees species to be planted around the
border of nallah / stream / pond (If any): NA
Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to
be transplanted: NA
compensatory plantation, if any : NA
Capital cost: 12,50,000/O&M cost : 1,50,000/- p.a.
O&M cost: 5,33,520/- p.a.
Power supply:
Maximum demand : 2141.86 KW
Connected load : 2141.86 KW
Source : MSEDCL
Use of T5-28W, CFL lamps shall be used for
Common area lighting
Use of non conventional energy i.e. Solar water
heating system
Transformers are located close to load center to
minimize transmission losses
Thus total energy saving will be 3160 unit/ day
Chairman
122
Traffic Management
Environmental
Management
Detail calculations & 35% of saving

Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: (Yes / No) (If yes
then submit compliance in tabular form)
Capital cost: 1,00,00,000/O&M cost: 2,00,000/- p.a.
DG Set:
82.5 KVA (1No) & 62.5 KVA (1No)
confluence: 1 No.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement: NA
Number and area of podia :NA
Total Parking area : 6,841.60 Sq m
Area per car
2-Wheelar : 464No.
4-Wheeler : 240No.
Public Transport
Width of all Internal roads (m): 12 and 9 m
plan Construction phase (with Break-up):
Capital cost
STP : 30,00,000/RWH : 6,00,000/SWN : 30,00,000/OWC : 6,00,000/Landscape : 12,50,000/Renewable Energy use : 1,00,00,000/TOTAL: 1,84,50,000/Operation Phase (with Break-up) O&M cost (Please ensure manpower and other details)
STP : 6,00,000/RWH : 75,000/SWN : 1,00,000/OWC : 4,00,000/Landscape : 1,50,000/Renewable Energy use : 2,00,000/TOTAL: 15,25,000/ Quantum and generation of Corpus fund and Commitment :
By Project Proponent
Responsibility for further O &M: Till handing over Project
Proponent. After that to society.
Decision:
Chairman
123
observations:
1. PP shall confirm that the 12 m wide approach road from high way to their plot is the
dedicated one and not a public road.
2. Submit consent for water supply and waste water disposal from the competent authority.
3. Relocate STP suitably so as to make the rear side of the building free of obstructions.
4. Submit geotechnical and hydrogeological design calculations for RWH.
5. Submit water budget details justifying the wate allocation for gardening purpose.
6. Submit the technical details of STP.
7. Total 421 trees (21 species) to be evenly planted in the plot and near the border wall along
the nalla.
8. Relocate lift from open well of the staircase to appropriate location.
Chairman
124
Item No. 27
Subject: Environmental clearance for the expansion of Educational Campus at village
Marunji, Hinjewadi, Pune by M/s. Alard Charitable Trust
The PP requested to postpone the project appraisal.
Item No. 28
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Residential & Commercial Complex on
plot bearing S No. 331, H.No. 1 to 9, S.No. 336, H.No. 1/2/5/6, S.No. 337, H.No. 2,
Village Bavdhan Budruk, Dist. Pune by M/s. Viva Swaraj
The PP was absent.
Chairman
125
Item No. 29
Subject: TOR for 120 TMTPA New LPG Bottling Plant at F-5, MIDC Chincholi, Tal
Mohol, Dist Solapur by M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Name of the
Project
Project
Proponent
New
project/Expansion
in existing project
/ Diversification
in exiting project
Type of project:
Activity serial
Number as per
MoEF
Notification
(amended)
Total plot Area:
Location details
of the project :
120 TMTPA New LPG Bottling Plant

M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
New
6(b) - Isolated storage & handling of hazardous chemicals (As per

threshold planning quantity indicated in column 3 of schedule 2 & 3 of
MSIHC Rules 1989 amended 2000)
42.50 Acres
F-5, MIDC Chincholi, Tal Mohol, Dist Solapur
Longitude 17-46-22.82
Latitude 75-48-20.83
Bulk LPG
Raw materials
Production details 120 TMTPA Capacity LPG Bottling Plant
10 CMD during Construction, 15 CMD during Operation.
Water Budget
500 KW Electricity, 630 KVA DG Set
Energy
Decision:
proponent. All issues related to environment, including air, water, land, ecology and biodiversity
and social aspects were discussed. SEAC decided to consider the project under Category B1. As
the proposed project is located in MIDC area, public hearing is exempted. Besides the model TOR
furnished in these minutes/on website, the project proponent shall cover the following aspects in
their EIA studies, viz. Risk Assessment study, HAZOP Study and submit EIA Report as per
MoEF guidelines incorporating the risk assemment results. After this, the project proponent may
approach the committee for the appraisal.
Chairman
126
Item No. 30
Subject: TOR for the modernization/ modification of industrial project, at Plot No D-85 &
D-86 MIDC Wai, Tal - Wai, Dist-Satara by M/s Precious Alco And Petro Chem.
Pvt Ltd
(File No. SEAC 2011
/ CR 871 / TC2)
The PP was absent.
Chairman
127
Item No. 31
Subject:
Environmental clearance for the Installation of 55 MW Gas Based Power Plant

at JSW Ispat Limited, Geetapuram, Dolvi Village, Tal. Pen, Dist. Raigad by
M/s. JSW Ispat Steel Limited (Compliance cases)
(File No. SEAC 2011 / CR-583 / TC2)
Decision:
In this case, PP informed SEAC in its 55th meeting that he has also applied for an expansion of
steel manufacturing from 3 MTPA to 5 MTPA capacity and CPP of 300 MW based on blast
furnace gas. Considering this, SEAC, in its previous meeting, advised PP to seek clarification
from MoEF whether the proposal for 50 MW and 300 MW power plant and the expansion of steel
plant have to be combined into one or not. PP has not submitted the clarification from MoEF in
response to Circular dated 22nd March, 2010. After delebration the Committee decided that the
project falls into Category A and the two proposals are interlinked. Therefore, PP is advised to
approach MoEF for EC.
Chairman
128
Item No. 32
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Defense City at Village Bhawadi, Taluka: Haveli,
Dist: Pune by M/s. Vinay Tiwari
(File No. SEAC 2211 / CR -987/ TC2)
The PP was absent.
Item No. 33
Subject: Environmental clearance for 'The Latitude', Expansion Residential project at
S.No.18, Hissa No.6 Kondhawa Khurd, NIBM Road, Pune by M/s. Ahura Builders
The PP was absent.
Chairman
129
Item No. 34
Subject: TOR for the Setting of Incineration Plant (Waste to Energy) for Municipal Solid
Waste at Survey no. 15, 16, 17 & 18, Daighar village, Thane by Thane Municipal
Corporation
Name of the
Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
New
project/Expansion
in existing project
/ Diversification in
exiting project
Previous
Considerations
Type of project:
Total plot Area:
Estimated cost of
the project :
Location details of
the project :
Distance from
Protected
Areas
Raw materials
(including
process chemicals,
catalysts, &
additives)
Production details
Setting of Incineration Plant (Waste to Energy) for Municipal Solid Waste

for Thane Municipal Corporation
Municipal Commissioner, Thane Municipal Corporation
M/s Fine Envirotech Engineers
New project
Nil
7(i) & 1(d) Incineration Plant (Waste to Energy) for Municipal Solid Waste
199800 m2
Rs. 250 crores
Latitude: 19 o 0825 N
Longitude: 73o 0313 E
Location: Survey no. 15,16, 17 & 18, Daighar village, Thane
PP has informed that there is no protected area/ critically polluted area/ eco
sensitive area/ inter state boundaries near the project
List of
raw
materials
to be used
Physical
&
chemical
nature of
raw
material
Municipal Solid
solid
waste
Main Product - Power
Quantity
(tones/year)
full
production
capacity
Source of
materials
365000
Thane
city
Means of
transportation
(Source to
storage site)
with
justification
In covered
trucks
Concept / Flow diagram for production of Waste to Energy
Chairman
130
Diagrammatic representation of process to be adopted
Process details /
manufacturing
details
Waste to Energy is a viable and sustainable option for proper disposal of

municipal solid waste and simultaneously generating a clean/ renewable
energy.
The Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) shall be processed for energy recovery
before disposal for landfill. The processing scheme includes the following
steps:
Pre sorting
grate combustion
Steam production
Renewable
energy
Components of Incinerator (W2E)
Any incineration plant includes following four main categories of
equipment:
Pretreatment
Combustion system
Energy recovery
Flue gas cleaning
Mass burning incineration with a movable grate incinerator is a widely used
and thoroughly tested technology for waste incineration. It meets the
demands for technical performance and is capable of accommodating large
variations in waste composition and calorific value. Another, but less
widely applied, mass burning alternative is the rotary kiln. Some
Chairman
131
technologies pretreat the waste stream to remove non-carbonaceous

materials, such as metal and glassfor example, for production of refuse
derived fuel. These technologies offer some benefits in terms of reduced
furnace size and improved energy efficiency. However, the front end
processing that shreds and mixes the wastes is demanding and expensive.
Therefore, the incineration technologies for burning pretreated and
homogenized waste are of limited useand historically, such technologies
have typically failed.
Theoretically, a fluidized bed may be applied for combustion of pretreated
and homogenized municipal solid waste. The fluidized bed technology has
a number of appealing characteristics in relation to combustion technique.
The advantages are, however, not thoroughly proven on municipal solid
waste, and the fluidized bed is therefore not recommended. The fluidized
bed may be good for special types of industrial waste, and for this purpose
it is widely appliedfor instance, in Japan. When implementing a new
municipal solid waste incineration plant, the technology must be based on
feasible and well-proven technology. At present, only the mass burning
principle with a movable grate fulfils this criterion. The design of the
combustion system must obstruct the formation of pollutants, especially
NOx and organic compounds such as dioxins, as much as possible. A main
benefit of solid waste incineration is the possibility of reusing the waste as
fuel for energy production. The other major benefit of this technology is
that it uses least land as compared to other established technology for waste
processing.
The flue gases carrying the energy released in a waste incineration furnace
have to be cooled in a boiler before the air pollution control system. The
boiler is also a necessary technical installation for energy recovery.
Incinerating municipal solid waste generates large volumes of flue gases.
The flue gases carry residues from incomplete combustion and a wide range
of pollutants. The pollutants and their concentration depend on the
composition of the waste incinerated and the combustion conditions. Ash,
heavy metals, and a variety of organic and inorganic compounds can be
found in varying quantities. The Technical Guidance Report published by
World Bank enumerates the key criteria for Incineration Technology as
follows:
The technology should be based on the mass burning principle with a
movable grate. Furthermore, the supplier must have numerous reference
plants in successful operation for a number of years.
The furnace must be designed for stable and continuous operation and
complete burnout of the waste and flue gases (CO<50 mg/Nm3, TOC<10
mg/Nm3).
The flue gases from the furnace must be cooled to 200C or lower before
flue gas treatment.
The flue gas cleaning equipment must be at least a two-field ESP (basic
emission control, dust<30 mg/Nm3).
A controlled landfill must be available for residue disposal. Full leachate
Chairman
132
control must be exercised at the landfill.

The annual amount of waste for incineration should not be less than 50,000
metric tons and the weekly variations in the waste supply to the waste
incineration plant should not exceed 20 percent.
Municipal solid waste incineration plants should be in land-use zones
dedicated to medium or heavy industry.
The stack should be twice the height of the tallest building within 1.0 km,
or at least 70 meters high.
Water Budget
RWH
Procedure for MSW Processing and Disposal Adopted by Thane

Municipal Corporation
The Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) shall be processed for energy recovery
before disposal for landfill. The processing scheme includes the following
steps:
MSW Pre- Processing: mixed MSW will be manually segregated for
removal of poly vinyl plastics and other hazardous materials. Metal parts
shall be removed using a magnetic separator while inerts shall be screened
using a trammel. Thus the MSW shall be converted into Refuse Derived
Fuel (RDF) in the pre- processing plant.
Energy recovery plant: The semi processed RDF shall be heated in power
plant boilers through environment friendly heating process to generate
steam which would be sent to a turbine for energy recovery.
Ash handling plant: The ash produced during the energy recovery process
shall be collected and can be used as an aggregate substitute material in
cement, asphalt concrete, brick products. Etc.
Flue gas treatment plant: The flue gas cleaning system shall be installed
as a waste treatment line. It comprises of receiving and storing hydrated
lime, the neutralizing reaction tower, ejecting and cooling systems, active
carbon receiving and storing system, pre duster, filter bag and ash
transporting system.
Construction of sanitary landfill: in accordance with the MSW Handling
Rules 2000, only inert material shall be sent to landfill.
Fresh water (CMD): 100 m3/day (+ 50 m3/day)*
Source: Thane Municipal Corporation
Recycled water (CMD):
Use of the water:
Process (CMD): NA
Cooling water (CMD): 60 m3/day
DM Water (CMD): NA
Dust Suppression (CMD): NA
Drinking (CMD): 10 m3/day
Green belt (CMD): 30 m3/day
Fire service (CMD): *50 m3/day (not required daily)
All storm water in project area will be connected to drain.
Level of the Ground water table- 18m
Size and no of RWH tanks and qty.- NA
Chairman
133
Location of the RWH tanks- to be finalised

Size, nos of recharge pits and qty- 5 nos. (3m x 3m x 4m)
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O & M cost)- 10 lac/ annum
All storm water in project area will be connected to already existing
Storm water
municipal drain.
Drainage
Natural water drainage pattern - plain
quantity of storm water 800 m3/hour at peak rainfall
Size of SWD- 0.3m x 0.25m depth (0.6 m wide x 1.4m diameter channel)
Sewage and Waste Amount of sewage generation (CMD): 30 m3/day
Proposed treatment for the sewage: Biofilter by Thermax
water
Capacity of the STP (CMD) (If applicable): 30 m3/day
-Solid waste
Management:
Green Belt area (Sq. m.): 33% of total plot area
Green Belt
Number & Species of trees to be planted- 500nos
Development
Number, Size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be transplanted
Species of trees to be planted
Details of Fuel
used:
Energy
Atmospheric
Emissions
Emission
Standard
Sr.No.
Botanical Name
1
Albizia lebbeck
2
Azadirachta indica
3
Pongamia glabra
4
Ficus religiosa
5
Anthocephallus cadamba
6
Tamarindus indicus
7
Terminalia spp
8
Bauhinia racemosa
9
Bombax malabaricum
10
Phyllanthus emblica
The plant shall be operated using electricity
Construction phase: 300 KVA
Operational phase: 750 KVA
Sr
Pollutant Source
of
Emission
1
CO
-2
Others
-TOC
As per EU standards
Pollutants
Emission
(SPM, SO2,
Standard
etc.)
Limit
(mg/Nm3)
SPM
10
SO2
50
Common name
Shirish
Neem
Karanj
Pipal
Kadamb
chinch
Badam
Apta
Savri
Amla
Emission
rate
(kg/hr)
---
Concentration
in flue gas
(g/m3)
< 50mg/Nm3
< 10mg/Nm3
Proposed
limit
(mg/Nm3)
MPCB
Consent
(mg/Nm3)
50
NA
Chairman
134
NO2
200-400
CO
50-150
HCl
10.0
HF
1.0
Cd + TI
0.05-0.1
Hg
0.05-0.1
Total metals
0.5- 1.0
Dioxins and
0.1 ng
furans
TEQ/m3
Plant section Stack Height
& units
No.
from
ground
level (m)
Stack Emissions
Furnace
Ambient Air
Quality Data
Pollutant
PM 10
PM 2.5
SO2
NOx
CO
Details of
Pollution Control
Systems
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
4
Sr.
no.
1
2
3
4
Internal
diameter
(Top)
(m)
450
NA
50
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.1 ng
TEQ/m3
Emission Temp.
rate
of
exhaust
gases
Twice the
To be
height of
decided
the tallest
building
within 1
km or at
least 70m
Permissible Proposed
Remarks
Standard
Concentration
(g/m3)
(g/m3)
100
62.3
60
35.4
80
23.9
80
24.5
2
<0.4
Within limit
Within limit
Within limit
Within limit
Within limit
Air
Water
Noise
Solid Waste
Stacks of adequate height

STP to be installed
Thick green vegetation and acoustics
The proposed project is incineration of solid waste
Recurring
Capital cost
cost per
(in lacs)
annum
(in lacs)
Air pollution Control
18
35
20
80
6
28
Environmental Monitoring 10
and Management
Chairman
135
Reclamation borrow/
mined area (If applicable)
NA
NA
6
7
8
Occupational Health
Green Belt
Solid Waste management
Others ( Pl specify)
Total
15
12
The proposed
project is
incineration of
solid waste
-81
-22
The proposed
project is
incineration of
solid waste
-165
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. SEAC decided to consider the project under
Category B1. Besides the model TOR furnished in these minutes / on website, the project
proponent shall cover the following points in their EIA studies, viz. compliance to MoEF
guidelines pertaining to design specification, operating conditions, mitigation and monitoring of
various parameters of various air emissions pertaining to incinerator.
All the results of Risk Assessment study and HAZOP Study shall be incorporated into the
EIA report as per MoEF guidelines. A large scale layout, superimposed on the contour map shall
be prepared and submitted along with RWH and storm water drainage design details. As the
project is not located in a designated industrial area, public consultation will also be required.
After this, the project proponent may approach the committee for the appraisal.
Chairman
136
Item No. 35
Subject: Environmental clearance for MHADAs Mass Housing Project at Morwadi,
Pimpri, Pune
(File No. SEAC 2212 / CR -248 / TC2)
Name of Project
Proposed Housing Scheme for MHADA at

S.No- 150,152,153(P), Morwadi, Pimpri Waghere, Pune
Name of the Proponent
Mr Rajendra Nimbalkar,
Chief Officer,
Name of the Consultant
M/s Aditya Environmental Services Pvt. Ltd.,
Type of project: Housing MHADA- Housing Project

project / Industrial Estate /
SRA scheme / MHADA /
Township or others
Proposed Housing Scheme for MHADA at

S.No- 150,152,153(P), Morwadi, Pimpri Waghere, Pune
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation
DCR- as per PCMC

(If applicable)
Total constructed work (FSI+ Non FSI)

Date and area details in the necessary approvals issued by the
competent authority (attach scan copies) : Not applicable
LOI / NOC from MHADA Date and construction area details mentioned in the approved
/ Other approvals (If
letter
applicable)
Deductions
Net Plot area
Total Plot Area (sq. m.) : 26,539.25 sq.m

Total Deductions : 6500.88 sq.m
Net Plot area : NA
Permissible FSI (including No provision of TDR

TDR etc.)
Permissible FSI : 61,771.13 Sq.m
Proposed Built-up Area
(FSI & Non-FSI)
FSI area (sq. m.): 61,771.13 Sq.m

Non FSI area (sq. m.): 49,596.02 Sq.m
Total BUA area (sq. m.): 1,11,367.14 Sq.m
Ground-coverage
45.86% (including podium)

Chairman
137

project
Rs. 160 Crores

configuration(s)
Residential 4 Nos. (18 buildings with core)

Building M- 1 Part basement+Podium parking+12
Building L- 1 Part basement+Podium parking+12
Building K- 1 Part basement+Podium parking+12
Building J- 1 Part basement+Podium parking+14
Amenity - 1 Nos.
1 Part basement + 2

shops
888 Residential units

4 Offices
1 Nursing home
1 Day care centre
12 Shops
2 Showrooms
Number of expected
residents / users
Expected residents: 4440 No.

Proposed commercial floating population: 384 No.
334 tenaments/hector (for residential)
Maximum height: 50 m (including staircase room and over head water

tank)
Right of way (Width of

the road)
Nearest fire station is at Pimpri near D.Y Patil Engineering College.

Distance is 2.9 Kms from fire station to the proposed building.

movement from all
around the building
excluding the width for
the plantation
Main access roads are 12m wide and remaining all internal roads are
min 6m wide, for easy access of fire tender movement.
No existing structures on the proposed site.

with disposal (If
applicable)
Not applicable
Dry season:
Source: PCMC
Total Water Requirement (CMD): 616.68 CMD
Swimming pool make up (Cum): Nil
Fire fighting (Cum): UG : 75,000 lit
OHT : 10,000 lit. (For each building)
Wet Season:
Chairman
138

Source: PCMC
Total Water Requirement (CMD): 616.68 CMD
Swimming pool make up (Cum): Nil
Fire fighting : UGT: 75,000 lit
OHT : 10,000 lit. (For each building)
(RWH)
Level of the Ground water table: 4 m

Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: Nil
Location of the RWH tank(s)
Please Refer : Appendix 23_Location of Recharge Pits
Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity : 10 Nos.
Size: 2.5 m dia X 3.0 m depth with borewell upto 15 m
Capital Cost: Rs. 8,77,000/- (Rupees Eight Lacs Seventy Seven
Thousand only)
O&M cost: Rs. 60,000/- (Rupees Sixty Thousand only)
UGT tanks
Location(s) of the UGT tank(s)

Please refer to Appendix 22_Location og Under Ground water Tank
Storm Water drainage
Natural water drainage pattern: The site has a gentle slope towards
the west. Overall the site has flat terrain.
Quantity of storm water : 0.27 cu.m/sec
Size of SWD :
450 mm X 450 mm
Sewage and Waste

water
Sewage generation (CMD) 493.34

STP technology : MBBR (Moving Bed Bioreactor)
Capacity of STP (CMD) : 520 CMD
Location of the STP : Please refer Appendix no. 16
DG sets (during emergency) : DG Set No.1 62.5 KVA
Capital cost: Rs. 91,83,750/- (Rupees Ninety One Lac Eighty Three
Lac Seven Hundred and Fifty Only)
O & M cost: Rs. 11,34,432 /- (Rupees Eleven Lac Thirty Four
Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty Two only)
Waste generation in the Pre Construction and Construction

phase:
Peak labour assumed to be 150 Nos.
Waste generation : 30kg/day
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: 1170.22 cu.m
Disposal of the construction waste debris : No demolition work
involved, thus no debris generated on site due to demolition work.
Excavated material generated on site shall be reused for road levelling
and back filling. The construction waste generated during construction
shall be segregated, reused on site and surplus shall be led to scarp
dealers for recycling.
Chairman
139

Dry waste (Kg/day): 325.54 kg/day
Wet waste (Kg/day): 735.74 kg/day
E waste (Kg/month): Negligible
Hazardous waste (Kg/month): Nil
Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): Negligible
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day): 74 kg/day
Dry waste: Waste shall be collected by PCMC municipal solid waste
collection system
Wet waste: Treated on site in vermi composting units and used as
organic manure for landscaping
E waste: Handed over to local authorized E-waste collection
agency
Hazardous waste: NA
Biomedical waste (If applicable): Handed over to authorized
Biomedical waste collection agency
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): Treated on site in vermi composting units
and used as organic manure for landscaping
Area requirement:
treatment of the solid waste: 100 sq.m
Location: Please refer to appendix no 17 for location of
vermicomposting pits.
Capital Cost: Rs. 5,25,000/- (Rupees Five lac, Twenty five thousand
only.)
O&M cost: Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only)
Green Belt
Development
Total RG area:
playground, etc.)
RG on the ground (sq. m.) : 5,060 sq.m
RG on the podium (sq. m.) 1,652.11 sq.m
. Plantation:
ground RG:
Approximately 331 no. of trees shall be planted.
Following is the list of tree species to be planted:
Sr.No Botanical Name
Common Name
1
Albizia lebbeck
Shirish
Chairman
140
Azadiracta indica
Neem
Bombax ceiba
Katesavar
Pongamia pinnata
Karanj
Ailanthus excelsa
Maharukh

planted in the podium RG: 5927
Following are the list of shrubs and bushes species to be planted.
Sr.No
Botanical Name
Common Name
Adhatoda vasica
Adulasa
Vitex negundo
Nirgud
Plumbago zeylanica
White plumbago
Number and list of trees species to be planted around

the border of nallah / stream / pond (If any): NA
Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees
to be transplanted : No trees needs to be uprooted.
compensatory plantation, if any : Not Applicable
4. Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost) :
Capital cost: Approximately Rs.16,56,197/- (Rupees Sixteen Lac Fifty
Six Thousand One Hundred And Ninety Seven.)
O & M Cost: Rs. 5,50,000/- (Rupees Five lac, fifty thousand only)
Energy
Power supply:
Maximum demand for Residential: 5192 kW
Connected load:
Proposed Residential: 9257 kW (connected load)
Proposed Commercial: 88.8 kW(connected load)
Source : Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company
(MAHADISCOM )
Energy saving measures :
Use of high efficacy lighting fixtures T5, CFLs with electronic
ballasts. Use of electronic ballasts as opposed to the electro-magnetic
ballasts shall reduce the loss of energy and improve the operation
power factor. Electronic Chokes also improved the life of florescent
lamps.
Detail calculations & % of saving : 26.3% saving is achieved.
The key Energy conservation measures are
a) Lighting power density in compliance with ECBC
Chairman
141
All cables will be de-rated to avoid heating during use. This also
indirectly reduces losses and improved reliability.
b) Solar Water heating system shall be proposed to cater to the hot
water requirement of the project, thereby saving considerable amount
of energy.
c) The architectural design shall cater to optimized daylight and
ventilation, thereby reducing the energy spent in artificial lighting
during day time and in cooling devices.
d) The elevators shall have group control and VFD, thereby saving
energy.
e) All the pumps shall have minimum 60% efficiency and motors shall
have minimum 75 % efficiency.
f) Energy meters shall be installed to monitor the energy consumption
for External lighting, treated water pumping, municipal water
pumping, common area internal lighting etc.
ECBC is applicable for non-residential building with HVAC.
Following are the ECBS compliance points:
Sr
ECBC Compliance
1
Section 4.2- Mandatory requirements for envelope :

1. Fenestration details as- U value and SHGS shall be in coordinance with Appendix C, in ECBC
2. Opaque construction- U value shall be determined as per
Appendix C, in ECBC
3. Building envelope ceiling as specified in ECBC
Section 5.2- Mandatory requirements for HVAC :

-For naturally ventilated spaces the design shall comply with
NBC of India 2005 Part 8 Section 1, 5.4.3 and 5.7.1
-Minimum equipment efficiencies, controls, piping and duct
work shall be as mentioned by ECBC.
Section 6.2- Mandatory requirements for service hot water

and pumping :
The project would be providing solar water heating system
for minimum 1/5 of design capacity.
Equipment efficiency- Service water heating equipment shall
meet or exceed the performance and minimum efficiency
requirements presented in available Indian Standards.
Section 7.2- Mandatory requirements for lighting:

Lighting controls, Exit signs, lighting for exterior building
grounds shall be provided as specified in ECBC, as
applicable.
Section 8.2- Mandatory requirements for electrical power :

Transformers, Energy efficient Motors, power factor
correction, check metering and monitoring, power
distribution systems shall be as specified in ECBC.
Chairman
142

Capital cost for Solar Water Heating: Rs. 1,22,10,000/O & M cost for Solar Water Heating: Rs.1,50,000/DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used
Providing 15% backup of the total connected load
DG set capacity (Back Up) = 1220 kVA (for all essential common
utilities)
DG Set No.1 capacity- 500 kVA 1 No.
DG Set No.2 capacity- 320 kVA 1 No.
DG Set No.3 capacity 200 kVA 1 No.
DG Set No.3 capacity 200 kVA 1 No
Type of fuel used : Diesel (Low Sulphur)
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Capital cost
Parameter
Total Cost (in Rs.)
Erosion control dust suppression

measures and barricading
10,00,000/-
Site Sanitation
1,80,000/-
Site Safety
7,50,000/-
1,75,000/-
Disinfection and Health Check-ups

60,000/Operation Phase (with Break-up) Capital cost
Particulars
Capital cost
O & M Cost
(per year)
Sewage treatment plant
Rs. 91,83,750/-
Rs. 11,34,432/-
Solid waste management
Rs.5,25,000/-
Rs. 30,000/-
Landscaping
Rs.16,56,197/-
Rs.5,50,000/-
Rain water harvesting
Rs. 1,75,000/Rs. 8,77,000
Rs.60,000/-
Solar Hot water system

Rs.1,22,10,000/- Rs. 1,50,000/a. Quantum and generation of Corpus fund and commitment Project
proponent shall operate and maintain the premises for 1 year after
giving possession and provision will be made available for O & M of
the project. During this tenure the developer shall undertake Annual
Maintenance contract for maintaining the environmental infrastructure
on site.
b. Responsibility for further O & M: The provision for the AMCs
shall be given to the society.
Chairman
143
Traffic Management

Parking details:
Number and area of basement- 1 Part basements
Area- 12,471 sq.m
Number and area of podia: 1 level of Podium,
Area- 12,290 sq.mt
Total Parking area : 24,761 sq.m
Area per car
2-Wheelar- 3 sq.m
4-Wheeler- 12.5 sq.m
Public Transport : PCMC Bus stop at 0.12 km
Width of all Internal roads (m): Min 6m, Max 12m.
Decision:
The PP had not submited the documents and the case was discussed on the basis of the
presentation made. The Committee noted that the Phase-I and Phase-II are completed and
apparently some portions of land have been conveyed to tenents. Form-I submitted by the PP
contained information only pertaining to Phase-III,. Cnsidering the expansion project of MHADA
plot, overall information regarding Phase-I and Phase-II are required. It was also noted that the
ground coverage Phase-III is 45.86% and the open space is less that 10%, which is grossely
inadequate for the entire project Phase I, II and III.
1. The access to the plot is 12 m DP road from 30 m highway and 24 m DP road on the other
side. The highest building in the proposal is of 50 m; for this atleast 24 m right of way is
required. Therefore PP shall furnish data regarding the right of way to their plot.
2. Submit DCR extract applicable to the provision of open space for Phase-I, II and III.
3. Submit revised Form-I, as there are discrepancies between the documents presented during
the presentation and Form-I.
4. The copies of standing orders of Govt. about mass housing and terms of conveyance deeds
as applicable may be furnished.
5. The DP plan submitted indicated that an adjoing plot also belonging to MHADA; this may
be clarified by furnishing a clear large scale DP applicable to the whole area in
consideration.
Site visit by SEAC may be made during its visit to Pune to assess the site conditions, if needed.
Chairman
144
Item No. 36
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed residential and commercial complex
located on plot bearing S.No. 63/5, Ambegaon, Dist. Pune by M/s. Viva Swastik
Associates
The PP has requested to postpone the project.
Item No. 37
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed residential and commercial project at
S.No. 99/1, 99/2, Warje, Dist. Pune by M/s. Abhi Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
The PP has requested to postpone the project.
Chairman
145
Item No. 38
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Residential and Commercial Development (Mixed
use Development) at Village Hinjewadi, Tehsil- Haveli, Dist.-Pune, State
Maharashtra by M/s. RR Mega City Builders Pvt.Ltd.
(File No. SEAC 2211 / CR -943/ TC2)
Name of the
Project
Project
Proponent
Consultant
Type of
project:
Location of the
project
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal /
other area
Applicability of
the DCR
Note on the
initiated work
LOI / NOC
from MHADA
/ Other
approvals (If
applicable)
Total Plot Area
(sq. m.)
Deductions
Net Plot area
Permissible
FSI (including
TDR etc.)
Mixed Use Project for R.R Mega City Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Rajesh Jaggi, Managing Director , M/s. RR Mega City Builders Pvt.Ltd.
M/s. Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy & Laboratory
Residential and Commercial Development (Mixed use Development)
S. No. 221/2, 222/1, 222/4(P), 222/5/1(P), 222/5/2(P), 223/1, 223/2, 223/3,
223/4, 223/5, 224/1(P), 224/2/1, 224/2/2, 224/3, 224/4, 224/5, 224/6, 224/7,
225/1/1A, 225/1/1B, 225/1/1C, 225/1/2, 225/2, 225/3, 226/1, 226/2. Village
Hinjewadi, Tehsil- Mulshi, Dist.-Pune, State - Maharashtra.
Regional planning Development Control Rule (DCR).
(10 Kms from PMC)
No
No Work started on site
Date and construction area details mentioned in the approved letter:
Plot Area: 1,20,596.00 Sq. Mt.

Deductions: 1292.3 Sq. mt.
Net Plot Area: 119303.7Sq. mt.
0.9 FSI
Chairman
146
Proposed
Built-up Area
(FSI & NonFSI)
FSI area (sq. m.):

For Residential : 90,428.54 Sq. Mt.
For Amenity-1 : 8188.58 Sq.mt
For Amenity-2 : 9304.76 Sq.mt.
For Residential : 1,28,293.18 Sq. Mt.
Total BUA area (sq. m.):
Residential : 2,18,721.72 Sq.m
Amenity-1 : 10,189.80 Sq.m
Amenity-2 :11,256.41 Sq. mt.
46,416.10 Sq. Mt.

Ground(39 % of net plot area)
coverage
Percentage (%)
Estimated cost Rs. 608.61 Crores
of the project
No. of building
& its
configuration(s
Phase
Bldg. Type
)
No. of Bldg.
No.
of
Flats/
Shop
s
Height
of the
Buildin
g
mt
Configuratio
n
A1,A2,A3
& A4
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B1, B2
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
C1, C2
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
A5,A6,A7
& A8
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B3, B4
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
Phase-I
Phase-II
Chairman
147
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P +
7Upper
Residential
Floor
E1 & E2
46
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Residential
Floors
A9,A10,A1
1 & A12
164
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
B5 & B6
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Upper
Residential
Floor
C3 & C4
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
Convenien
t Shopping
Complex
--
57
16
G+4 Floors
School
--
--
28.8
G + 8 Floors
46 Nos. of
shops
--
46
--
Bldg. Type
No. of Bldg.
No.
of
Flats/
Shop
s
Height
of the
Buildin
g
mt
A1,A2,A3
& A4
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B1, B2
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Phase-III
Amenity
-1
Amenity
-2
Number of
tenants and
shops
Phase
Phase-I
Configuratio
n
Chairman
148
Residential
Floor
C
C1, C2
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
A5,A6,A7
& A8
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B3, B4
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P +
7Upper
Residential
Floor
E1 & E2
46
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Residential
Floors
A9,A10,A1
1 & A12
164
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
B5 & B6
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Upper
Residential
Floor
C3 & C4
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
Convenien
t Shopping
Complex
--
57
16
G+4 Floors
Phase-II
Phase-III
Amenity
-1
Chairman
149
Amenity
-2
Number of
expected
residents /
users
Tenant density
per hector
Height of the
building(s)
School
--
--
28.8
G + 8 Floors
46 Nos. of
shops
--
46
--
Bldg. Type
No. of Bldg.
No.
of
Flats/
Shop
s
Height
of the
Buildin
g
mt
A1,A2,A3
& A4
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B1, B2
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
C1, C2
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
A5,A6,A7
& A8
164
41.6
Stilt + P + 11
Upper
Residential
Floor
B3, B4
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P +
7Upper
Residential
Floor
E1 & E2
46
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Residential
Floors
14332 Nos.
250 Per Hectare
Phase
Phase-I
Phase-II
Configuratio
n
Chairman
150
A9,A10,A1
1 & A12
164
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
B5 & B6
82
41.6
Stilt + P +
11 Upper
Residential
Floor
D1
25
28.8
Stilt + P + 7
Upper
Residential
Floor
C3 & C4
16
19.2
Stilt + P + 4
Upper
Residential
Floor
Convenien
t Shopping
Complex
--
57
16
G+4 Floors
School
--
--
28.8
G + 8 Floors
46 Nos. of
shops
--
46
--
Phase-III
Amenity
-1
Amenity
-2
Right of way
(Width of
the road )
Turning radius
for easy
access of fire
tender
movement
from all
around the
building
excluding the
width for
the plantation
Existing
structure(s)
Details of the
demolition
with disposal
(If applicable)
Proposed 36.0 Mt wide Road abutting to Plot and From Fire Station 12.0m
Wide Road connecting to proposed 36.0m Wide road which further connects to
plot approach which is 12.0m wide road. The nearest hinjewadi fire station is
700mts with travel time of 1min.
6.0m Minimum Driveways with 6.0 m radius and wider space at turning.
No any existing structure on project site

No demolition involved
Chairman
151
Total Water
Requirement
Rain Water
Harvesting
(RWH)
Dry season:
Fresh water (CMD): 612& Source:Grampanchayat
Swimming pool make up (Cum): - Fire fighting (Cum):650
Wet Season:
Fresh water (CMD): 612 & Source:Grampanchayat
Total Water Requirement (CMD):1081
Swimming pool make up (CMD):
Fire fighting (CMD):650
Level of the Ground water table: Groundwater accumulation was observed in
boreholes during and after completion of drillingactivities. Groundwater was
not encountered in any of the boreholes. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in
ground water levels can be expected to occur.
Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity:
Phase- I : 2 nos. of RWH tank each of capacity 50 m3 of
Phase- II : 2 nos. of RWH tank each of capacity 50 m3
Phase- III : 2 nos. of RWH tank each of capacity 50 m3
School : 2 no. of tank of capacity : 10 m3
Shops : 2 no. of tank of capacity : 20 m3
Location of the RWH tank(s):Phase-I Near Club House-2,
Phase-II- Near Building E1,
Phase-III- Near Building C3
Near Club House 1 &
Near Amenity Building
i. Shopping Mall - 5 nos. of RWH pits with silt chamber Size of the pit is 1.5
m. dia. x 3.5 m. ht. + 6" dia. pipe going up to a depth of 50 m
ii. School- 5 nos. of RWH pits with silt chamber: Size of the pit is 1.5 m. dia.
x 3.5 m. ht. + 6" dia. pipe going upto a depth of 50 m
iii. Residential-16 nos. of RWH pits with silt chamber: Size of the pit is 1.5
m. dia x 3.5 m. ht. + 6" dia pipe going upto a depth of 50 m
UGT tanks
Storm water
drainage
Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost): Capital Cost : Rs.180.21
Lakhs
O & M : Rs. 8.7 Lakhs/ Anum
Location(s) of the UGT tank(s):
Phase-I Near Club House-2,
Phase-II- Near Building E1,
Phase-III- Near Building C3
Natural water drainage pattern: Contoured land sloping from ES to NW.
quantity of storm water:
Shopping complex-56.86 m3/day i.e. 0.0006 m3/sec
Chairman
152
Sewage and
Waste
water
Residential- 937.24 m3/day i.e. 0.0108 m3/sec

School 55.55m3/day i.e 0.00064 m3/sec.
Size of SWD: 600 mm, 300 mm and 450 mm wide storm water drain size with
1: 250 slope
STP technology: Extended aeration system
Capacity of STP (CMD): 3 nos. of STP
4. Phase-I : 190 M3
5. Phase-II : 240 M3
6. Phase-III : 205 m3
7. Shopping Complex + school STP : 290 KLD
Location of the STP: Phase-I, Phase-II, Phase-III, Shopping Complex +
school STP
DG sets (during emergency): Load considered in the Common D.G. Set.
Solid waste
Management

Capital cost : Rs.188.49 lakhs ,
O &M cost : 35.00 Lakhs/ Annum
Waste generation:1000 cu.mtr. approx. Demolition
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: -Disposal of the construction way debris: Site already had structures and
excavated areas when purchased and the debris generated was used to fill the
excavated areas.
Dry waste (Kg/day):2285
Wet waste (Kg/day):2417
E waste (Kg/month):- Hazardous waste (Kg/month): - Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable):- STP Sludge (Dry sludge) (Kg/day):95
The project proponents have proposed provision for segregation and collection
of bio-degradable waste and recyclable waste within the premises. Vesselcomposting of wet garbage will be done. Dry garbage will be handed over to
the authorized contractors to recycle to reduce the load on dumping ground.
Dried sludge from STP will be used as manure.
Area requirement:
Area required for Solid waste management: 78 sq.mt.
Capital Cost : Rs. 26.00 Lakhs
O & M Cost : Rs. 10.00 Lakhs /Annum
Chairman
153
Green Belt
Development
Total RG area:
1. RG area other than green belt (Please specify forPlayground, etc.)-2. RG area under green belt:
RG on the ground (sq. m.): 37,313.73 Sq.mt (37 % of net Plot area )
RG on the podium (sq. m.): --
Energy
3. Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in theground RG:1493 nos.
Number and list of shrubs and bushes species to beplanted in the podium
RG:- Number and list of trees species to be planted around the border of nallah
/ stream / pond (If any):- Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, treesto be transplanted :
Existing trees : - NOC for the Tree cutting / transplantation/
compensatory plantation, if any
Capital Cost : 700 Lakhs & O & M Cost : 12 Lakhs/ Annum
Power supply:
phase
Connected Load
kW
Maximum
Demand
kW
D.G. Set
Capacity
kVA
Phase-I
6246
1636
2 nos. of 630
Phase-II
7002
1788
2 nos. of 630
Phase-III
7108
1857
2 nos. of 630
Amenity-I
Shopping
Complex
808
712
1 no. of 1010
Amenity-II
School
634
556
1 no. of 750

Electrical & LV Systems:
a.
Copper conductor cables are specified for sizes of 16 sq mm and below,
this will reduce losses and improve reliability.
b. Power factor shall be maintained 0.92 or higher. This will reduce electrical
power distribution losses in the installation.
c. Timers shall be used to switch ON / OFF external landscape and facade
lighting.
Chairman
154
d. Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) with high frequency ballast shall be

used for corridors areas.
e. Energy efficient fluorescent tube lights (T-5) shall be used for common areas
& car parking
f. All fluorescent light fixtures are specified to incorporate electronic chokes
which have less watt-loss compared to electro-magnetic chokes and result in
superior operating power factor. This indirectly saves energy. Electronic
chokes also improves life of the fluorescent lamps.
g. Energy efficient fluorescent lamps & CFL lamps which give approx. 30%
more light output for the same watts consumed and therefore require less nos.
of fixtures and corresponding lower point wiring costs.
Compliance of the ECBC guidelines: Yes
Sr.
Requirement
No.
Exterior lighting to be controlled by photo
1
sensor or time switch
Interior lighting
Power to be within specified limits
Using CFL & Energy Efficient T5 in
corridors and lobbies
Using Solar water heater for Club House
2
Additional Strategies
2
4
5
6
1. Programmable timer switch to control

common area lights
2. T5 used in place of T8 in Parking areas.
More efficient Lights
Exterior lighting
Power to be within specified limits and 11
LED based post lantern lights with battery
backup is used for external lighting.
Energy efficient motors
Power factor be maintained between 0.95 and
unity
Check metering
Compliance
Complied
Complied
Complied
Complied
Complied
Complied

Capital Cost : Rs. 25 Lakhs
O & M Cost : Rs.0.5 Lakhs/ Annum
DG Set:
Number and capacity of the DG sets to be used:
Phase-I : 2 nos. of D.G. set of capacity 630 KVA
Phase-II: 2 nos. of D.G. set of capacity 630 KVA
Chairman
155
Phase-III : DG set : 2 nos. of D.G. set of capacity 630 KVA

Amenities 1 : DG set : 1 nos. of D.G. set of capacity 1010 KVA
Amenities -2 : DG set : 1 nos. of D.G. set of capacity 750 KVA
Type of fuel used : LSD
Environmental
Management
plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Construction phase (with Break-up):

Capital cost
O & M cost (Please ensure manpower and other details)
SR.
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Parameter
Water for dust suppression
Site sanitation
Environmental monitoring
Disinfection
Health check up
Creche for labours
children
Total cost
Total Cost (RS. IN

LACS)
7.5
1.5
0.3
0.2
1.5
10.5
21.5
Operation Phase (with Break-up) Capital cost

O&M cost (Please ensure manpower and other details)
PARAMETER
Rs. In lacs
OPERATIONAL
&
MAINTAINACE
COST (Rs. In
lacs/annum)
STP COST
188.4885
35
180.21
8.7
MoEF Approved
Laboratory
30
SET UP COST
SR.
NO.
1
RAIN WATER
HARVESTING
2
3
ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING
SOLAR LIGHTS
50
GARDENING
700
12
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT
26
10
Chairman
156
1144.70
TOTAL COST
96.70
Quantum and generation of Corpus fund and Commitment

Project proponent shall operate and maintain EMF for 3 years after giving
possession and shall also generate corpus fund during 3 years for O & M of
Rs.290.1 lacs (i.e. Rs. 96.70 lacs x 3 years).
Responsibility for further O &M
Corpus fund shall be handed over to the party. While handing over
Environmental Management Facilities M.O.U. shall be made with society to
accept responsibility of further O & M of EMF.
Traffic
Management

We had Proposed our Entry- Exits for Vehicles from -12 m Wide Road, and
36m Wide MD Road.
Parking details:
Number and area of basement : - Number and area of podia: 1no. - 40,039.22 Sq.mt.
Total Parking area :
Car park level 1: 36600Sq.mt.
Car park levels 2: 26572 Sq.mt.
Area per car: 30.2 Sq.mt.
4-Wheelar :
PHASE
STILT
PODIUM
Phase-1
207
198
Phase-2
203
195
Phase-3
197
193
TOTAL
607
586
GRAND TOTAL - 1193

Amenity Car nos.
Amenity-1- 82 nos.
Amenity-2- 93 nos.
2-Wheeler:
PHASE
STILT
PODIUM
Phase-1
322
312
Phase-2
339
304
Phase-3
329
296
Chairman
157
TOTAL
990
912
GRAND TOTAL- 1902

Amenity - 2 Wheeler nos.
Amenity-1- 82 nos.
Amenity-2- 93 nos.
Public Transport: -Width of all Internal roads (m):10 mt. &18 mt. wide
Decision:
the proponent. The PP has submitted EIA report during presentation. It was noted that currently
10 m wide road exists; however, there are proposed DP roads of 30 m and 36 m on the sides of
the plot. The building has a setback for the proposed 36 m road widening. This needs clarification
with respect to the the time scale involved to complete the roads. Considering the building height
of 41 m, the PP has obtained NOC from CFO. The status regarding the disposal of treated sewage
by the ULB is not clear; hence it is not desirable to increase the pollution load. The location and
area of solid waste management facility are not rationally designed.
PP is directed to comply with the following preliminary observations:
1. Submit the consent for water supply and drainage system from a competent authority
indicating the time frame.
2. Submit hydrogeological and geotechnical design details and calculations of RWH system.
3. Relocate domestic water tank away from treated waste water tank.
4. Submit technical details of solid waste management facility w.r.t. collection, storage,
treatment and disposal.
5. Submit details of compliance to ECBC guidelines for the entire project.
6. More trees / more species of trees to be planted and shown on the landscape plan. Tree
cluster in and around the green areas 1,2 and 3 to be shown in the plan.
PP has submitted EIA report and the Committee requires time to study it. For a construction
project full details as per Form 1A are required. These may also be submitted
Full appraisal of the project will be done after the submission of the above details.
Chairman
158
Item No. 39
Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed 250 MW Thermal Power Plant
industrial project at Kawthala village in Chimur Tal of Chandrapur by
M/s. Aparna Infraenergy India Private Limited
Name of the Project

Project Proponent
Consultant
New Project / Expansion in
existing project /
Modernization /
Diversification in existing
project
Activity schedule in the
EIA Notification
Area Details
Name of the Notified

Industrial area / MIDC area
TOR given by SEAC? (if yes
then specify the meeting)
Estimated capital cost of the
project:
Location details of the
project:
Distance from protected Areas

/Critically Polluted areas/ Ecosensitive areas/ inter-State
boundaries
Proposed 250 MW Thermal Power Plant industrial project

M/s Aparna Infraenergy India Private Limited
M/s Pollution & Ecology Control Services
New
1(d) [250 MW Coal Based Thermal Power Plant]

Total plot Area (sq. m.): 250 Acres
Built up Area (sq. m.):
Main Plant 146.7 Acres
Land for ash disposal and raw storage 75 Acres
Township 28.3 Acres
NA
Yes 28th meeting SEAC dated 26th May 2010
Rs 1117.186 Cr
Latitude - 20 3223 N
Longitude - 79 25 42 E
Location- Kawthala village in Chimur tehsil of Chandrapur
District of Maharashtra.
Elevation above Mean Sea Level 242 (metres)
No critically polluted area, No National Parks/Wild life
Sanctuary within 10 km radius.
Chairman
159
Raw materials (including

process chemicals, catalysts, &
additives).
Production details
Process details /
manufacturing details
(RWH)
Sewage generation and

treatment
List of
raw
material
s to be
used
Physical and
chemical
nature of
raw material
Quantity
(tones/month)
full
Production
capacity
Source of
materials
Coal
Solid
4041 TPD
WCL Coal
Mines
Nand Reservoir
Total
(T/Year)
Water
liquid
806 m3 / hour
Name of
Existing Proposed
Products,
(T/Year) activity
By products
(new /
and
modernizat
Intermediate
ion /
Products
expansion)
(T/Year)
Main Products Power

250 MW
By-Products
Ash
1610 TPD
Proposed 250 MW Coal Based Thermal Power Plant
Level of the Ground water table: The depth to water level in
the area varies from 5.9 m to 15.1 m below ground level in
pre-monsoon. The reported average annual fluctuation in the
area is 2.5 to 9.3 m.
Size - 1.5m x 1.5m x 2.0m and no. of RWH tank (s) and
Quantity
Location of RWH tank (s)
Size, nos. of recharge pits and Quantity
All rain water harvesting structures will be
constructed to recharge ground water.
Fresh water (CMD): 806 m3 / hour & Source Nand
Reservoir
Use of the water :
Cooling water(CMD): 754 m3 /hour
DM Water (CMD): 25 m3 /hour
Dust Suppression(CMD): treated water will be reused
Drinking (CMD): 5 m3 /hour
Green belt(CMD): treated water will be reused
Storm water drainage system will consist of well-designed
network of open surface drains with rainwater harvesting pits.
A separate drainage system will be provided in which plant
effluent will not be mixed.
--
Chairman
160
Sr.
1
Effluent characteristic
3
4
5
Parameters
pH
Oil & Grease
(mg/l)
TSS (mg/l)
COD (mg/l)
BOD (mg/l)
Temperature, 0C
7
8
9
ETP details
Note on ETP technology to be
used
Disposal of the ETP
sludge (If applicable)
Solid waste Management:
Atmospheric Emissions
SPM, SO2, NOx, CO, etc.)
Stack Emission Details:
Total residual
chlorine(mg/l)
Fluoride, (mg/l)
TDS, mg/l
<10
<100
<250
<30
Not exceeding 5C above
the receiving water temperature
<1.0
<2.0
<2100
-Neutralizing Pit, Guard Pond

The main solid waste from the proposed power plant will be
ash (Fly ash and Bottom ash).
The ash generation is about 1610 TPD Out of this, the bottom
ash will be about 20% of the total ash generated i.e.322 TPD
and the fly ash will be 1288 TPD.
Bottom ash, will be ultimately disposed low lying area. It is
proposed to utilize 100% of the fly ash for which ash
utilization plan is ready.
During emergency the ash will be disposed off safely in ash
pond area. To control fugitive dust emission from the ash
pond area water layer will be maintained above the ash pond.
High-density polyethylene (HDPE) lining of thickness 1mm
to 1.5 mm will be provided in ash dyke to arresting leachate.
MoU has been signed with Murli Industries for lifting of Fly
Ash.
New Unit
Stack
No.
Details of Fuel to be used
Outlet effluent Characteristic

5.5 to 9.0
1st
Fuel
Height
Internal
Emission
Temp.
from
Diameter Rate
of
ground
(TOP)
Exhaust
level (m)
(m)
Gases
220 m
16.5 m
55.86g/sec
1300C
Daily Consumption
Calorific %
%
(TDP/KLD)
value
Ash Sulphu
(Kcals/kg
r
Chairman
161
Coal
Energy
Details of Pollution Control

Systems:
Environmental Management
Plan Budgetary Allocation
Existing
Proposed )
4041
TPD
1838
%
0.40.6%
Power supply:
Existing power requirement: Nil
Proposed power requirement: 3 MVA for construction
purpose
DG sets: 500 KvA
Number and capacity DG sets to be used (existing and
proposed) : 2 (Backup)
Details of the non-conventional renewable energy proposed to
be used : NA
Green belt area (Sq. m.): 33% Plot Area
Number and species of trees to be planted Approximately
1500 trees per ha will be planted in consultation with the local
Forest Department.
Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be
transplanted None
Sr.
i.
Air
Jet Pulse Bag filter, Electrostatic
Precipitators(ESP), water spray systems
ii.
Water
Effluent treatment plant Neutralization
tank
iii. Noise
Ear muffs/ear plugs will be provided to
the workers, Acoustic laggings and
silencers will be provided in equipment
iv) Solid
Ash Handling Plant
Waste
Sr.
Recurring Capital cost
Cost /Y
1.
6
50
2.
Water Pollution Control 1
10
3.
Noise Pollution Control 1
5
4.
Environment
1
2
Monitoring and
Management
5.
Occupational Health
2
5
6.
Green Belt
1
5
7.
Solid waste
management
8.
Others ( Pl. Specify)
30.5
3005
ESP for stack emission
control
Total
42.5
3082
Chairman
162
EIA Report
Public Hearing report
EIA report is submitted.

Date of the public hearing 20/04/2012
Name of the news paper in which the advertisement
appeared :Dainik Lokamt and The Hitwada
Location of the public hearing Adivasi Ashram Shala, at
Gaedapar, Tal. Chimur, Dist. Chandrapur
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed .The PP is directed to comply with the following
preliminary observations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Submit justification for site selection considering few forests within study area.
Submit details of impacts of the proposed project on flora and fauna of forest.
Carry out simulation for noise propogation
Consider air emission from the coal storage yard of 4000 TPD along with stack emission
for calculating of air pollution and proposing the mitigation measures thereof.
5. Submit the revised the EIA accordingly.
Chairman
163
Item No. 40
Subject: Environmental clearance for the Shree Ganesha valley at S. No.193
H.No.2+3+6+7+8+9+10+ll+12+13A & S.No. 192/1/1 at Deolali Dist- Nashik,
Maharashtra by M/s. Mahalaxmi Infrastructures
Name of the
Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
Shree Ganesha valley

M/s. Mahalaxmi Infrastructures
M/s. Ultra-Tech
S. No.193 H.No.2+3+6+7+8+9+10+ll+12+13A & S.No. 192/1/1 at

Location of the
Deolali Dist- Nashik, Maharashtra
project
8a-B2 Construction project
Type of Project
Nashik Municipal Corporation.
Whether in
Corporation /
Municipal / other
area
Applicability of the Nashik Municipal Corporation.
DCR
Note on the
At S.No.193.No.2+3+6+7+8+9+10+ll+12+13A & S.No. 192/1/1 at
initiated work
Deolali Dist- Nashik, Maharashtra of Plot Area 20905.40 Sq.m.
(If applicable)
Applied in anticipation of total Plot potential for Environment
Clearance on date 18th February 2011.
The sanctions were taken from TP in the year 2010. As per sanction
dated 07/02/2011, FSI area was 18893.86 sq.mt.
We had applied for EC in February 2011. We had started construction
and Status of the work:
Building
Status
Construction area in Sq. Mt.

Completed
In progress
Partially
complete
85%
8545.44
2848.48
Partially
complete
85%
5541.643
977.937
Chairman
164
Total Plot Area
Permissible FSI
(including
TDR etc.)
Proposed Built-up
Area
(FSI & Non-FSI)
Ground-coverage
Percentage (%)
Estimated cost of
the project
No. of building &
its
configuration(s)
Number of tenants
and shops
Number of
expected
residents / users
Tenant density per
hector
Height of the
building(s)
Right of way
(Width of
the road)
Turning radius for
easy access of fire
tender movement
from all around
There were no existing trees on site.

The site have contours of 1- 2 mtrs.
Current status of site Construction work is on hold
Total plot area: 20905.40Sq.Mt.
Deductions- D.P. Road : 81 Sq.Mt.
M.S.E.B : 125 Sq.Mt.
Net plot area : 20699 Sq. Mt.
Residential : 18604.77 Sq.mt.
TDR - 285 Sq.mt.
Total :18889. 77Sq.mt.
FSI area (sq. m.): 18889.77
Non FSI area (sq. m.): 11407.66
Total BUA area (sq. m.): 30297.43
4812.53 Sq. Mt.
Rs. 51.74 Cr.
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No. of
Buildings
Gaurinanadan
Varad
Sumukh
Mayuresh
Prathamesh
Atharva
Amey
Akshya
No. of
floors
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
Parking + 8
No. of
Flats
32
32
32
32
32
16
16
32
224
Height of
buildings
25.60
25.60
25.60
25.60
25.60
25.60
25.60
25.60
Flats 224 Nos.

Shops NA.
Residents: 1120 nos.
120 Per Hectare

For All Residential Buildings 25.60 m (each)
15 Mt wide Road abutting to Plot which is further connected to 60m t
wide road 100 mt away.
6m Minimum Driveways with 3m radius and wider space at turning.
Chairman
165
the building
excluding the
width for the
plantation
Total Water
Requirement
Rain Water
Harvesting
(RWH)
Storm water
drainage
Sewage and Waste
water
Solid waste
Management
Fresh water (CMD): 101 & Source:NMC

Total Water Requirement (CMD):101
Swimming pool make up (Cum): NA
Fire fighting (Cum):100 (CMD)
Level of the Ground water table: Below 10 mtr.

Size, no of recharge pits and Quantity: 13 Nos. of pits with borewells
having size 4mt. X 4mt X 4mt.
Budgetary allocation : Capital cost Rs. 52.00 Lacs and O&M cost.
Rs. 60 lakhs/annum
Natural water drainage pattern: By Gravity
quantity of storm water: 314.4 m/day
Size of SWD : 450 mm wide storm water drain
Sewage generation (CMD): 131
STP technology: SBR Based Technology
Capacity of STP (CMD): 150
Location of the STP: Eastward side.
Waste generation : From Workers activities
Non biodegradable :11 Kgs/ day
Biodegradable : 26 Kgs/ day
Quantity of the top soil to be preserved: Approx 4150 cum
Disposal of the construction way debris: Approx 14350 Cum

Biomedical waste (Kg/month) (If applicable): 15Kg/day
STP Sludge (Dry sludge) Approx. 20 Kg/day
Dry waste: handed over to NMC Ghanata Gadi
Wet waste: OWC
E waste: NA
Hazardous waste: Shall be handed over to authorized recyclers.
Biomedical waste (If applicable): shall be sent to the biomedical
waste disposal facility.
Chairman
166
Green Belt
Development
STP Sludge (Dry sludge): used as manure

Area requirement: total area provided for the storage and treatment of
the solid waste: 6 sq. m.
Total RG area:7441.73 Sq.mt.
1. RG area other than green belt (Please specify for Playground, etc.)
Landscape on the parking slab (sq. m.): 600 sq. m
Landscape on the ground (sq. m.): 6841.73
3. Plantation:
Number and list of trees species to be planted in the ground RG: 155
Nos.
Sr.
No.
Common
Name/ English
Name
Botanical Name
No Of tree
Rain Tree
Samania saman
11
Shirish
Alibizia leback
19
Golden shower
Cassia fistula
06
Palas tree
Butea monosperma
09
Indian cork
Melingtonia
hortensis
17
Arjun
Terminalia kunjata
19
Chapa
Plumeria alba
23
Neem
Azadiricta indica
09
Kanchan
Bhaunia purpuria
07
10
Coconut tree
Coco Nucifera
35
Total
Energy
155
Power supply:
Connected Load : 949.20 KW
Maximum load : 673.93 KW
Source: MSEDCL
Maximize the use of natural lighting & ventilation through design.
CFL based lighting will be done in the common areas, landscape areas,
signages, Entry gates and boundary compound walls etc.
Solar energy will be provided for common amenities like Street
lighting, Garden, Parking & Building Staircase.
Chairman
167
Timer Switch for Streetlight, Garden light, building staircase &

common passages for saving electrical energy.
Traffic
Management
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
Nos. of the junction to the main road & design of confluence: Junction
of 24m wide and 12m Wide Road at SW corner of Plot.
Proposed our Entry- Exits for Residential Vehicles from 60m Wide Road,
and For Commercial Entry-Exit from 12m Wide Road.
Parking details:
Total Parking area 3673.52 Sq. M.
Area per car 16.40 Sq. M
2-Wheelar 364
4-Wheeler 183
Public Transport Nashik Municipal Transport
Width of all Internal roads (m): Minimum 6m Driveways
Capital cost: 176.07 lakhs and O&M cost: 19.23 lakhs/annum
Decision:
the proponent. All issues related to environment, including air, water, land, ecology and
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. It was noted that almost entire construction is
completed.
The original application was submitted on 16.02.2011 and it appears that PP has already
initiated construction although Form-I did not disclose anything about the construction initiated.
However, the revised Form-I, submitted during the appraisal, disclosed details of construction
completed. The Environment Department shall look into the violation and misrepresentation of
the information and take necessary action.
1. There is 9 m public road which PP has agreed to widen to 15 m at his own cost. An
undertaking regarding the same may be submitted.
2. Although PP has paid charges for water supply and drainage system, the consents for both
are yet awaited. PP shall submit the same.
3. Provide additional staircases for the buildings exceeding 50 m height.
4. Submit the details of compliance to ECBC/ BEE guidelines for the entire project. Solar
water heating system may be considered as a part of ECBC compliance.
5. Relocate domestic water tank away from STP and treated waste water tank.
inadequate.
Chairman
168
Item No. 41
Subject: TOR for the proposed expansion of industrial project at G 60, MIDC, Tarapur,
Dist: Thane by M/s. Aarti Drugs Ltd
Name of the
Project
Project Proponent
Consultant
New
project/Expansion
in existing project
/ Diversification in
exiting project
Type of project:
Activity serial
Number as per
MoEF
Notification
(amended)
Total plot Area:
Estimated cost of
the project :
Expansion of industrial project

M/s. Aarti Drugs Ltd
M/s Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Expansion in existing project
5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry
16,500 m2
Existing : 4.5 Crores
Proposed : 11.5 Crores
Total : 16 Crores
EMP: 1.10 Crores
Location details of Latitude: 19 48 22 N
Longitude: 72 43 54 E
the project :
Location: Plot No. G-60, MIDC Industrial Area, Tarapur, Boisar, Dist. Thane,
Maharashtra
The existing industry is situated in notified MIDC.
Distance from
Protected
Areas / Critically
Polluted areas /
Eco-sensitive
areas
/ inter-State
boundaries
Chairman
169
Raw materials (including process chemicals, catalysts, & additives) :

Ciprofloxacin HCl -- 100 MT PER MONTH
Raw Material for intermediate Q - Acid
Sr. No. Name of Raw Material
Per Batch Qty.
2,4 Dichloro 5-Fluoro Aceto Phenone
65,404 KGS
Di Methyl Carbonate
58,598 KGS
Sodium Hydride (NaH)
22,244 KGS
Di Methyl Sulphate
57,851 KGS
Di Methyl Formamide
33,615 KGS
Toluene
53,950 KGS
Cyclo Propyl Amine
19,173 KGS
Caustic Soda Flakes
77,356 KGS
Sulphuric Acid 98%
39,508 KGS
Acetic acid
63,329 KGS
Raw Material for Ciprofloxacin HCl
Piperazine (Anhydrous)
37,700 KGS
N-Butanol
1,00,000 KGS
Hydrochloric Acid 30% (Comm. HCL)
73,100 KGS
Activated Carbon 320 MB
5,600 KGS
Hyflow Supercell
2,000 KGS
E.D.T.A Di Sodium
500 KGS
Sodium Hydro Sulphite (84-88%)
500 KGS
Liq. Ammonia 25%
62,600 KGS
Methanol
99,000 KGS
Hydrochloric Acid (LR Grade)
46,100 KGS
Acetic Acid
76,300 KGS
2,4 Dichloro 5-Fluoro Aceto Phenone
78,800 KGS
Di Methyl Carbonate
70,600 KGS
Sodium Hydride (NaH)
26,800 KGS
Di Methyl Sulphate
69,700 KGS
Di Methyl Formamide
40,500 KGS
Toluene
65,000 KGS
Cyclo Propyl Amine
23,100 KGS
Caustic Soda Flakes
93,200 KGS
Sulphuric Acid 98%
47,600 KGS
Metformin HCL- -- 125 MT PER MONTH
Raw material for Metformin HCL:
Di Cyandiamide 99.5% (D.C.D.A.)
69,250 KGS
Di Methyl Amine HCL (D.M.A. HCL)
86,375 KGS
Mix Xylene (1.37% Consumed 98.63% recovery) 3,125KGS
Methanol
28,125 KGS
375 KGS
Caustic Soda Flakes
50 KGS
Hydrochloric Acid
120 KGS.
Diclofenac Sodium - 60 MT PER MONTH
Raw material for Diclofenac Sodium
Chairman
170
2,6, Di Chloro Phenol Aminophenyl

Methyl Mono Chloro Acetate
Potassium Carbonate (Gurnul K2CO3)
Di Methyl Formamide
Aniline
Sodium Methoxide (CH3ONA)
Toluene
Chloro Acetyl Chloride (CAC)
Toluene
Hydrochloric Acid 30%
Aluminium Chloride [ ALCL3 ]
Hydrochloric Acid 30%
Caustic Soda Flakes
Sodium Hydro Sulphite
Iso Propyl Alcohol
E.D.T.A Di Sodium
Production details
Sr.
Products
No.
1
2
3
4
5
Rain Water
Harvesting
Water Budget
41,520 KGS
31,020 KGS
20,880 KGS
1,620 KGS
24,000 KGS
47,700 KGS
14,400 KGS
31,140 KGS
20,580 KGS
10,260 KGS
42,840 KGS
20,460 KGS
21,720 KGS
1,920 KGS
4,380 KGS
9,000 KGS
240 KGS
Existing Proposed Total
MT/M
MT/M
MT/M
Ciprofloxacin HCl
Metaformine HCl
Diclofenac Sodium
(Including intermediate)
Cipro
Bulk Drugs
Total
60
45
21
120
80
39
180
125
60
45
5
176
55
12
306
100
17
482
Description
Area
(m2)
* Co-Eff
Max. Rain
(m/Day)
Volume
(m3/Day)
Terrace Area
3630
0.90
0.050
163.35
Paved Area
2700
0.80
0.050
108.00
Unpaved Area
7650
0.50
0.050
191.25
Total
462.6
Size nos. Of recharge pits and Quantity : (3m x 3m x 3m TD): 2 Nos
Total water Requirement: Proposed
Fresh water (CMD):38 & Source: MIDC, Tarapur
Use of Water: Proposed
Process (CMD): 0
Cooling Water (CMD): 18
Drinking (CMD): 0
Green Belt(CMD):0
Chairman
171
Sewage and Waste

water
Sewage
Generation &
Treatment
Effluent
Characteristics
Sr

Others (CMD):Floor Washing: 14
Scrubber: 06
m3/day
Amount of sewage generation (CMD): Existing:- 20 m3/day Proposed :- Nil
Parameter
Raw Effluent
1
2
Treated
Effluent
7.1
55
Unit
pH
3-4
---Biological Oxygen
3,000-4,000
mg/L
Demand
3
Chemical Oxygen
8,000-10,000
165
mg/L
Demand
4
Total Suspended Solids 1,500-2,500
72
mg/L
5
Total Dissolved Solids
4,000-5,000
266
mg/L
3
Amount of effluent generation (CMD): Existing :- 119 m /day Proposed:- Nil
Capacity of the ETP: Existing ETP capacity 160 m3/day
Amount of water send to the CETP(CMD):
Membership of the CETP (if require): yes
ETP Details
Solid waste generation & disposal :

Existing
Proposed
Quantity
Quantity
Solid Waste Generation & Mitigation
1 Domestic
35 Kg/day
15 Kg/day
Hazardous Waste Generation & Mitigation
Sr Source
Total Quantity Mitigation

50 Kg/day
ETP Sludge
0.5 MT/M
0.5 MT/M
1 MT / M
Process Residues
& wastes
45 MT/M
45 MT/M
90 MT / M
Spent Carbon
0.5 MT/M
21.4 MT/M
21.9 MT / M
Spent Organic
Solvent
15 MT/M
15 MTM
30 MT/M
Organic Liquid
Residues
375 MT/M
200 MT/M
575 MT / M
Distillation
Residues
15 MT/M
15 MT/M
30 MT / M
Vermi Composting
Sent to
CHWTSDF, Taloja
Sent to Waste Heat
Recovery Boiler
(Onsite)
Sent to
CHWTSDF, Taloja
Sale to Authorized
re-processor
Sent to Waste Heat
Recovery Boiler
(Onsite)
Sent to Waste Heat
Recovery Boiler
(Onsite)
Chairman
172
Discarded
containers/barrels
Atmospheric
Emmissions (Flue
gas characteristics
SPM, SO2, NOx,
CO, etc)
Stack Emission
Details:
Emission
Standard
Ambient Air
Quality Data
100 Nos. /M
Sr Pollutant
1 SPM
2 SO2
3 NOx
4 CO
Plant
Section &
units
WHRB
Thermopac
Boiler
DG Set
Pollutants
(SPM,SO2,
etc)
Source of
Emission
-Permissible
Standard
SPM
RPM
SO2
NOx
CO
Details of Fuel
used:
Source of Fuel :
Mode of
Transportation of
fuel to site
Details of
pollution control
system
Emission
Concentration
rate
in flue gas
(kg/hr)
(g/m3)
0.32
0.01
702
6.425
10440
2.81
1116
1.051
Internal
Temp. of
Diameter
Exhaust
(Top) (m)
Gases
Boiler+DG
Boiler+DG
Boiler+DG
Boiler+DG
Stack No. Height
from
ground
level (m)
1
52
0.5
1
15
0.4
1
30
0.6
2
4.2
0.2
Emission
Proposed
Standard
Limit
Limit
(mg/Nm3)
(mg/Nm3)
SPM
SO2
NOx
CO
Pollutant
Sale to authorized
recycler after
decontamination
900 Nos. /M 1000 Nos./M
-Proposed
Concentration
(in g/m3)
66.43
44.25
5.88
8.06
--
60 g/m3
-80 g/m3
80 g/m3
2 mg/m3
87
149
151
230
MPCB
Consent
(mg/Nm3)
150
495 kg/day
50 ppm
-Remarks
Within Limit
Within Limit
Within Limit
Within Limit
Within Limit
Sr
Type of Fuel
Existing
Proposed
Total
FO
165 MT/M
45 MT/M
210 MT/M
LDO
----
6 MT/M
6 MT/M
HSD
2 MT/M
----
2MT/M
Air Pollution Control System :

01 No. of Scrubber will be provided
Water Pollution Control System :
Sewage generated if any will be treated in Septic tanks & Soak pits &
Chairman
173
Energy
Green Belt
Development
Environmental
Management plan
Budgetary
Allocation
treated sewage will be used for green belt area.

Noise Pollution Control System :
Use of Acoustic Enclosures
Predictive maintenance of fans, blowers, compressors & other machineries.
Source: MSEB. The maximum demand of power is 2000 KVA required
Existing: 2 DG Sets of 437 and 380 KVA, Proposed: Nil
Existing Green Belt Area: 756.52 sq.m
Proposed Green Belt Area: No additional RG area envisaged for expansion
Number & Species existed: 140 Nos.
NAME
NUMBER
Saraca asoca (Ashoka)
35
Azadirachta indica (Neem) 60
Pongamia pinnata (Karang) 25
Cocos nucifera (Coconut)
20
Total
140
Sr. Description
Recurring
Capital Cost
Cost /Y (Cr) (Cr)
1
0.05
0.1
2
0.15
0.65
3
--4
Environmental Monitoring & Management
0.05
0.05
5
Reclammation borrow/mined area(if
--applicable)
6
Occupational Health
0.02
0.2
7
Green Belt
0.005
0.03
8
Solid Waste Management
0.01
0.05
9
Others (Rain Water Harvesting)
0.005
0.05
Total
0.29
1.40
Decision:
biodiversity and social aspects were discussed. It was noted that both PP and Consultant were not
able to provide project details w.r.t water budget, treated waste water charastreristics, compliance
of norms pertaining to O&M of incinerator and such other data required to establish the current
status of compliance of the conditions prescribed by MPCB. Therefore, PP is advised to submit
the aforementioned data and approach SEAC with a draft ToR.
Chairman
174
TOR for Municipal Solid Waste Management

(Incineration Technique- Waste to Energy)
ToR for EIA studies in respect of chemical fertilizer industry may include, but not limited to
the following
1
Executive summary of the project giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the
proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of
EIA report, including EMP and the post-project monitoring plan in brief.
Project description
2
3
Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.

Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its
availability and optimization.
Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various units within the plant.
3
4
Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with
material and energy inputs & outputs (material and energy balance).
Details on raw materials, source and storage with in the premises.
5
6
Details on requirement of energy and water along with its source and authorization from
the concerned department.
Details on water balance including quantity of effluent generated, recycled &
7
reused. Efforts to minimize effluent discharge and to maintain quality of receiving
water body.
Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and equipments to meet the
8
national standards.
9
Details on channelized emissions and control equipment for each of the source.
Control technologies for combustion emissions
10
Sources of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines.
Management plan for solid/hazardous waste including storage, utilization and safe
11
disposal. CPCB guidelines in respect of specific treatment, such as solar evaporation,
incineration, etc., need to be followed.
12
Details regarding fly ash utilization as per new notification
13
Detailed plan of ash utilization / management.
14
Details of evacuation of ash.
Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc.,
15
to the workers during construction and operation phase.
Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any
16
Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
Description of the environment:
17
The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed
project site.
Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to
18
be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
Landuse based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as
19
national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc., for the study area.
20
Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area.
21
Topography details of the project area.
The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of
22
environment viz. air, noise, water, land, and biology and socio-economic.
Chairman
175
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.

Details of groundwater and surface water quality of nearby water sources and other
surface drains. Water quality parameters may include pH*, BOD* (3 days at 27 oC),
COD*, toxicity factor*, Nitrate* (as N), Arsenic*, Chromium*, Hexavalent*, Total Lead*,
Cyanide as CN*, Zinc*, Mercury*, Copper*, Nickel*, Phenolics* as C6H5OH, Sulphide,
etc. (* - as applicable)
Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions
for PM10*, PM2.5*, SO2*, NOx*, VOC*, mercaptans*, solvents*, NH3*, chlorine*,
HCl*, HBr*, H2S*, HF*, other process-specific pollutants*, etc., and evaluation of
the adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices to meet standards for point
sources and to meet AAQ standards. (* - as applicable)
The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of
project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.
Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptors.
Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height.
One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season.
Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent
Authority.
Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and
quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance,
etc.
If any incompatible landuse attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe
the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on
significance for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Incompatible land use attributes
include:
a. Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground
water
b. Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts
c. Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year
d. Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity
is not permitted)
e. Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites
f. Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years);
g. Airport areas
h. Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and
other features as locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands,
pastures, migratory corridors, etc.
33
If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe
the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose additional points based on
significance for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes
include:
a. National parks
b. Wild life sanctuaries Game reserve
c. Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground
d. Mangrove area
e. Wetlands
f. Reserved and protected forests
Chairman
176
34
35
g. Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act,
1972, any other area locally applicable
h. Any other eco-sensitive areas
If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources
management shall be studied and presented.
If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the
authorized agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and
associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any.
Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scales for specific
observations. Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at
the point of disposal/impact areas.
Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal
fisheries.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures :

36
Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project.
37
Impact prediction tools used for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts .
38
Proposed odour control measures
Action plan for the greenbelt development species, width of plantations, planning
39
schedule, etc., in accordance to CPCB published guidelines.
In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests,
40
Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest
Department.
41
Mitigation measures for source control and treatment.
42
Details on improved technologies.
Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom, etc., to be
44
provided to the workers during construction as well as to the casual workers including
truck drivers during the operational phase.
Proposed measures for occupational safety and health of the workers
45
Environmental monitoring program:
46
Monitoring of pollution control at source
Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified parameters
47
air quality, groundwater, surface water, gas quality, etc. during operational phase of
the project.
48
Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers
Proposed plan to estimate and monitor fugitive emissions including VOCs from all the
49
sources and appropriated control measures.
50
Stack and fugitive emissions may be monitored for SPM, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx,
HC, CO, VOC and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control
devices to meet gaseous emissions.
51
Monitoring of carbon foot print
Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the
52
possible residual impacts on VECs.
53
Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for
conducting monitoring.
Additional studies :
Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project
55
and proposed safeguard measures.
Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property values,
56
generation of jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.
Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The
57
Chairman
177
plan should include quantitative dimension as far as possible.

Environmental management plan:
Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed postproject monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures.
EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along
59
with item-wise cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs).
Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation
60
61
Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster management
plan.
Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report at corresponding chapters, in
addition to the contents given in the reporting structure as below: .
58
Sr.
EIA Structure
Contents
a. Purpose of the report
b. Identification of project & project proponent
Introduction
c. Brief description of nature, size, location of the

project and its
d. importance to the country, region
e. Scope of the study details of regulatory scoping
carried out (As per
f. Terms of Reference)
Condensed description of those aspects of the project
(based on project feasibility study), likely to cause
environmental effects. Details should be provided to
give clear picture of the following:
a. Type of project
2
Project Description
b. Need for the project

c. Location (maps showing general location, specific
location, project boundary & project site layout)
d. Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated
activities required by or for the project)
e. Proposed schedule for approval and
implementation
f. Technology and process description
g. Project description including drawings showing
project layout, components of project etc.
Schematic representations of the feasibility
drawings which give information important for
Chairman
178
EIA purpose
h. Description of mitigation measures incorporated
into the project to meet environmental standards,
environmental operating conditions, or other EIA
requirements (as required by the scope)
i. Assessment of new & untested technology for the
risk of technological failure
a. Study area, period, components & methodology
3
Description of
the Environment
b. Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified

in the scope
c. Base maps of all environmental components
a. Details of Investigated Environmental impacts
due to project location,
b. possible accidents, project design, project
construction, regular
c. operations, final decommissioning or
rehabilitation of a completed
d. project
Anticipated
Environmental
Impacts &
Mitigation
Measures
e. Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting

adverse impa cts identified
f. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of
environmental
g. components
h. Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria
for determining
i. significance, Assigning significance)
j. Mitigation measures
Analysis of
Alternatives
(Technology &
Site)
a. Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for

alternatives:
b. Description of each alternative
c. Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative
Chairman
179
d. Mitigation measures proposed for each

alternative and selection of for each alternative
and selection of alternative
Environmental
Monitoring Program
Additional
Studies
Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of

mitigation mea sures (incl.
measurement methodologies, frequency, location,
data analysis, reporting
schedules, emergency procedures, detailed budget
& procurement schedules)
a. Risk assessment
b. Social impact assessment, R&R action plans
a. Improvements in physical infrastructure

b. Improvements in social infrastructure
Project Benefits
c. Employment potential skilled; semi-skilled

and unskilled
d. Other tangible benefits
Environmental Cost
Benefit Analysis
If Recommended at the scoping stage

Description of the administrative aspects that ensures
proper implementation of mitigation measures and
their effectiveness monitored, after approval of the
EIA
a. Overall justification for implementation of the
project
10
EMP
11
Summary & Conclusion

( This will constitute the
b. Ecplanation of how, adverse effects have been
summary of the EIA
mitigated
Report)
Disclosure of the
Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief
consultants engaged
resume and nature of Consultancy rendered
12
Chairman
180
TOR for Isolated Storages and Handling Hazardous Chemicals

ToR for EIA studies in respect of the isolated storages, which are involved in handling of hazardous
chemicals may include, but not limited to the following:
1 Executive summary of the project giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal,
use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report
including EMP and the post-project monitoring plan, in brief.
Project description:
2 Justification for selecting the proposed storage capacity.
3 Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, and its
availability and optimization.
4 Details of proposed location layout clearly demarcating various units within the plant.
5 Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of its distribution.
6 Details on design parameters of the storages, procedures, piping layout, monitoring
equipments, emergency requirements, safety controls, relief systems, etc.
7 Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored at the facility its category, physical &
chemical properties, storage quantities, etc., and compatibility with the design parameters of
the storages.
8 Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including
distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility.
9 Details on storage tanks including capacity and storage distance.
10 Details on transfer and handling of hazardous chemicals piping system, handling techniques,
equipments used, standard operating procedures, etc.
11 Details on specific equipments, flanges, pumps, compressors proposed to control loss of
chemicals. Designed VOC loss accounting.
12 Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes/equipments.
13 Details on requirement and availability of power and water with its source and authorization
from the concerned department.
14 Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal.
15 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the
workers during construction and operation phase.
16 Details on safety management plan.
17 In case of expansion of existing storages, remediation measures adopted to restore the
environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed
compliance to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions.
18 Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of
Law related to the environmental pollution and impacts in the last two years, if so, details
thereof.
Description of the environment:
19 The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed storage
facility.
20 Location of the storage facility, nearest habitats with distances from the facility to be
demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
21 Land use based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national
parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc..
22 Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area.
Chairman
181
23 Topography details of the project area.

24 The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of
environment viz. air, noise, water, land, biology and socio-economic.
25 Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.
26 Details on surface water quality of nearby water sources and other surface drains
27 Details on ground water quality.
28 Relevant ambient air quality parameters for monitoring including combustion emissions due to
traffic, VOCs and stored chemicals, etc .
29 Existing ambient air quality, expected emissions such as combustion emissions* due to traffic,
VOCs*, stored chemicals*, etc.) and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution
control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (* - as
applicable)
30 The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of storage
facility, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.
31 Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptor.
32 Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height.
33 One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season.
34 Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent
Authority.
35 Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area i.e. habitat type and quality, species,
diversity-domestic and wild, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance, etc.
Ecological status of the study areas, terrestrial and aquatic habitat types, biodiversity including
domesticated flora and fauna, ecological linkages, threats etc.
36 If any incompatible land use attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the
sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose additional points based on
significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible landuse attributes
include:
a. Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water
b. Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts
c. Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year
d. Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not permitted)
e. Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites
f. Cyclone, Tsunami-prone areas (based on last 25 years)
g. Airport areas
h. Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as
locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory corridors, etc.
37 If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the
sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on
significance for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:
a. National parks
b. Wild life sanctuaries, Game reserve
c. Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground
d. Mangrove area
e. Wetlands
f. Reserved and Protected forests, etc.
g. Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, any other
Chairman
182
area locally applicable

h. Any other eco-sensitive areas, etc.
38 If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources management
shall be studied and presented.
39 If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized
agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities
w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any.
a. Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific
observations.
b. Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of
disposal/impact areas.
c. Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal
fisheries.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures :
40 Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project may be evaluated for
significance and based on corresponding likely impacts Valued Environmental Components
(VECs) may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and
likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation
measures.
41 Impact prediction tools used for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts .
42 While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following for analysis of significance
and required mitigation measures:
a
impacts due to emissions from entry and evacuation of chemicals at storage points
b impacts due to temperature variations in the tanks
c
impacts due to emissions from handling of chemicals
d impacts due to emissions from cleaning operations
e
impacts due to odour pollution
f
impacts due to generation of wastewater from drainage facilities, cleaning, tanks, seepage,
etc.
g impacts due to noise from tank installations, conveyors, transportation of products, etc.
h impacts due to fugitive emissions/VOCs
i
impacts due to catastrophic failures
j
impacts due to residues/tank bottom sludge, etc.
k impacts due to fire/accidents
l
impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities
43 In case of likely impacts from the proposed storage facility on the surrounding reserve forests,
Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department.
44 Action plan for the greenbelt development species, width of plantations, planning schedule,
etc., in accordance to CPCB published guidelines
45 In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests, Plan for
the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department.
46 Identifying the mitigation measures.
Analysis of alternative resources and technologies:
47 Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site.
Conformity of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways,
railways, etc.
Chairman
183
48 Details of improved technologies and better operating practices.

Environmental monitoring program:
49 Monitoring programme for source control.
50 Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed to assess the possible
residual impacts on VECs.
51 Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified parameters air
quality, groundwater, surface water, soil, etc. during operational phase of the project.
52 Leak detection and repair programme.
53 Specific programme to monitor occupational, safety and health protection of workers.
54 Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for
conducting monitoring.
Additional studies:
55 Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project and
proposed safeguard measures.
56 Details on status of emergency preparedness safety procedures, training, personal protective
equipments, fire fighting devises, medical aids, safety control systems, management plans, etc.
57 Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property values,
generation of jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.
58 Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The plan
should include quantitative dimension as far as possible.
59 Details on compensation package for the people affected by the project, considering the socioeconomic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers.
60 Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the same.
Detailed action plan addressing the issues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of
funds.
61 Details on plan for corporate social responsibility including the villages, population spread,
SC/ST/backward communities, upgradation of existing schools, establishing new schools with
facilities (such as laboratories, toilets, etc.), link roads, community halls, primary health
facilities, health camps, etc.
Environmental management plan:
62 Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project
monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures.
63 EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with
item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).
64 Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation.
65 Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster management plan.
Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report at corresponding chapters, in
addition to the contents given in the reporting structure as below:
Sr. EIA Structure
Contents
1
Introduction
Purpose of the report
Identification of project & project proponent
Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its
importance to the country, region
Scope of the study details of regulatory scoping carried out
2
Project Description
Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on
project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects.
Chairman
184
Description of the
Environment
Anticipated
Environmental
Impacts & Mitigation
Measures
Analysis of
Alternatives
(Technology & Site)
Environmental
Monitoring Program
Additional Studies
Project Benefits
Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following:

Type of project
Need for the project
Location (maps showing general location, specific location,
project boundary & project site layout)
Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities
required by / for the project)
Proposed schedule for approval and implementation
Technology and process description
Project description including drawings showing project layout,
components of project etc. Schematic representations of
feasibility drawings which give information important for EIA
purpose
Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project
to meet environmental standards, environmental operating
conditions, or other EIA requirements (as required by the scope)
Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk of
technological failure
Study area, period, components & methodology
Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified in the scope
Base maps of all environmental components
Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project
location, possible accidents, project design, project construction,
regular operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a
completed project
Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts
identified
Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental
components
Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining
significance, Assigning significance)
Mitigation measures
Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:
Description of each alternative
Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative
Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection
of alternative
Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation
measures (incl. measurement methodologies, frequency, location,
data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency procedures,
detailed budget & procurement schedules)
Public consultation
Risk assessment
Social impact assessment, R&R action plans
Improvements in physical infrastructure
Improvements in social infrastructure
Chairman
185
9
10
11
12
Environmental Cost
Benefit Analysis
EMP
Summary &
Conclusion (This
will constitute the
summary of the EIA
Report)
Disclosure of
Consultants engaged
Employment potential skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled

Other tangible benefits
If recommended at the scoping stage
Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper
implementation of mitigative measures and their effectiveness
monitored, after approval of the EIA
Overall justification for implementation of the project
Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated
Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume
and nature of Consultancy rendered
Chairman
186

58MoM SEAC

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

58MoM SEAC

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Minutes of the 58th meeting of the SEAC held on 1st to 4th August, 2012

Minutes of the 58th meeting of the

1st to 4th August, 2012

1st to 4th August,2012

3. Ar. Mukund S. Athavale

1st to 4th August, 2012

4. Dr. Prashant P. Bhave

1st to 4th August, 2012

5. Prof. Tarun Kant

1st, 2nd & 4th August, 2012

6. Dr. Jay S. Samant

1st to 4th August, 2012

7. Er. Chandrakant I. Sambutwad

1st to 4th August, 2012

8. Er. Balbir Singh Sehgal

1st to 4th August, 2012

1st to 4th August, 2012

Member Secretary SEAC, Environment Department welcomed the members of the

Internal Discussion item no. 1

Location of the project

Sand dredging in Creeks of Kalawal, Karli, Mochemad,

Stone Quarry at Mouje Surgaon, Tal. Umred, Dist. Nagpur

Stone Quarry at Village Khaire, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane

Stone Quarry at Mouje Ausa, Tal. Ausa, Dist.Latur

Stone Quarry at Village Dhaliv, Tal. Vasai, Dist.Thane

Stone quarry at Khaire,Tal. Wada, Distt.Thane

Stone quarry at Mouje Dasai, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane

Stone quarry at Chinchwali, Tal. Ambarnath, Dist.Thane.

Stone quarry at Mouje Gunj, Tal. Wada, Dist.Thane

Internal Discussion item no. 2

The Crown Green Residential Development

Total Plot Area: 17,800 sq m.

FSI area: 31,972.41 sq m.

Existing structure &

Level of Ground Water Table : 5 to 7.2 m

Sewage and Waste

Total Water Requirement:-231.92 cmd

Jamun (Syzygium cumini)

Tree species Existing & to be retained:

Number & list of Shrub & bushes species to be planted in the

Number, size age and species of trees to be cut or transplanted :

Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost)

Energy saving can be achieved due to following:

car Overall Covered: 26.56 sq.m. Per car

The Crown Greens - Residential Development

Total Plot Area: 21,330 sq m.

Existing structure &

Level of Ground Water Table : 5 to 7.2 m

Sewage and Waste

Sewage generation (cmd) : 201.93

Jambhul (Sygygium cumini)

We propose to install solar water heating panels and supply hot

Sewage and waste

Natural water drainage pattern - West to East

Waste generation in the pre Construction and Construction

Shrubs & GroundcoverNo.

Ixora Chinese orange

Hamelia patens dwarf

Allamanda nerifolia nana

Canna red/yellow dwarf

Oleander dwarf single red

Plumbago capensis blue

Musseanda erythrophylla red